請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57665
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃世建(Shyh-Jiann Hwang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Vu Duy Vui | en |
dc.contributor.author | 武維樂 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:56:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-14 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.ATC-40, “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings,” ATC-40 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, USA, 1996
2.ASCE 41-06, “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings,” by American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 2006 3.FEMA 273, “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, ” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1997 4.FEMA 356, “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, ” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 2000 5.FEMA 440, “Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, ” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 2004 6.NCREE-09-023, “Technology handbook for seismic evaluation and retrofit of school buildings,” Second edition, National Center on Research for Earthquake Engineering, Taipei Taiwan, (in Chinese), Nov. 2009, 299 pp. 7.NCREE-09-020, “International training program for seismic design of structures,” National Center on Research for Earthquake Engineering, Taipei Taiwan, Oct. 2009, 260 pp. 8.NCREE-08-031, “Verification of Pushover Analysis on In-Situ Test of School Buildings,” National Center on Research for Earthquake Engineering, Taipei Taiwan, Dec. 2008, 48 pp. 9.NCREE 09-015, “Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structure with Pushover Analysis,” National Center on Research for Earthquake Engineering, Taipei Taiwan, (in Chinese), June. 2009, 159 pp. 10.Sung, Y.C., Liu, K.Y., Su, C.K., Tsai, I.C., and Chang, K.C., “A study on pushover analyses of reinforced concrete columns”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005, pp. 35-52. 11.Comartin, C. D., Niewiarowski, R.W., Freeman, S.A., Turner, F.M., “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building: A Practical Overview of the ATC 40 Document,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 16, No. 1, Feb. 2000, pp. 241-261. 12.ACI Committee 318, “Building code requirement for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (318R-05),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 2005, 430 pp. 13.Elwood, K. J., and Moehle, J. P., “Drift Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Light Transverse Reinforcement,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005, pp. 71-89. 14.Elwood, K. J., and Moehle, J. P., “Axial Capacity Model for Shear-Damaged Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 102, No. 4, 2005, pp. 578-587 15.CSI, “ETABS: Extended 3D analysis of building systems, nonlinear version 9.5,” User’s Manual, Computer and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, 2008 16.CSI, “ETABS: Extended 3D analysis of building systems, nonlinear version 9.5,” Computer and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California, 2008 17.Priestley, M. J. N., and Park R. (1987). “Strength and Ductility of Concrete Bridge Columns under Seismic Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V.84, Issue 1, pp. 61-76. 18.Priestly, M.J.N., Verma, R. and Xiao, Y. (1994), “Seismic shear strength of reinforced concrete columns”, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 120(8), 2310-2329. 19.Aschheim, M. and Moehle, J.P. (1992), “Shear strength and deformability of reinforced concrete bridge columns subjected to inelastic cyclic displacement”, Report No. UCB/EERC-92/04, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley. 20.Tu, Y.H., Liu, T.W., Ao, L.C., and Yeh P.L., “Nonlinear static seismic analysis and its validation using damage data from reinforced-concrete school buildings,” Proceeding, Third Asia-Pacific Young Researchers and Graduates Symposium, Taipei, Taiwan, Mar. 2011, pp. 306-313 21.Ministry of the Interior, “Seismic Design Code and Illustration of Buildings,” Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C., (in Chinese) 2006. 22.Chopra, A. K., “Dynamics of Structures - Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1999 23.Hsu, T. T. C., Unified Theory of Reinforced Concrete, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993, 336 pp. 24.Chen, Yi-Hsin, “Seismic evaluation of RC buildings infilled with brick walls,” PhD. dissertation, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan (in Chinese), 2003 25.Sezen, H., “Seismic behavior and modeling of reinforced concrete building columns,” PhD. dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2002. 26.Sozen, M. A., Monteiro, P., Moehle, J. P., and Tang, H. T., “Effects of cracking and age on stiffness reinforced concrete walls resisting in-plane shear,” Proc., The Fourth Symposium on Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment, and Piping, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, Dec. 1992, 3.1-3.13. 27.Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N., “Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992, 744 pp. 28.Moehle, J. P.; Elwood, K. J.; and Sezen, H., “Gravity Load Collapse of Building Frames during Earthquakes, ” S. M. Uzumeri Symposium: Behavior and Design of Concrete Structures for Seismic Performance, SP-197, S. A. Sheikh and O. Bayrak, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., 2002, pp. 215-238. 29.Moehle, J. P., “Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra, 8(3), 1992, pp. 403-428 30.Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ) “Design guideline for earthquake resistant reinforced concrete building based on inelastic displacement concept, ” Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, 1999 (in Japanese) 31.Imbsen Software Systems, “XTRACT Release Notes v3.0.5 012606,” 9912 Business Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95827, 2006. 32.Microsoft Visual Basic Express 2005 – Microsoft Corporation @ 2005. 33.Luu, C. H., “Seismic Assessment for Reinforced Concrete School Building,” Jul. 2011, pp. A1-A31. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57665 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The problem of seismic assessment of low-rise school buildings is significant in Taiwan after the Chi-Chi earthquake in 1999. The technology of seismic assessment of low-rise school buildings has already been developed in NCREE handbook. However, in design practice, there are still numerous problems that need to be considered. In the study, two pushover tests of school building are compared with the analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the TEASPA method. Besides, a new method, SERCB, which considers the change of axial force in practical structure when earthquake occurs, is called SERCB, claims to be more efficient in describing the behavior of member in nonlinear analysis. Based on the obtained base shear – roof displacement curve and failure mechanism that are determined from each analysis, this study proposes some recommendations for simulating plastic hinges for members of school buildings. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:56:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01521253-1.pdf: 4641318 bytes, checksum: 1e56202a278d150e26e2071cf0df0af1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ABSTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGMENT iii LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives 3 1.3 Organization of Report 3 CHAPTER II SEISMIC ASSESSMENT 2.1 Literature reviews 5 2.1.1 Performance-based engineering 5 2.1.2 Nonlinear static procedures 7 2.1.3 Nonlinear dynamic procedures 7 2.1.4 Capacity spectrum method 8 2.2 Methodology 11 2.2.1 TEASPA method 11 2.2.2 SERCB method 14 2.3 Pushover analysis with ETABS 9.7.4 15 CHAPTER III SIMULATION OF MEMBER BEHAVIOR 3.1 Column 19 3.1.1 TEASPA method 19 3.1.2 SERCB method 26 3.2 Beam 31 3.3 Brick wall hinge 31 3.4 Hinge simulation in ETABS 36 CHAPTER IV COMPARISON OF TEASPA METHOD 4.1 In-situ Tests of Guan Miao 39 4.2 Comparison with test result of Guan Miao 43 4.3 In-situ Tests of Rui Pu 46 4.4 Comparison with test result of Rui Pu 48 CHAPTER V COMPARISON OF SERCB METHOD 5.1 Simulating analysis for Guan Miao 50 5.2 Comparison with Tests of Guan Miao 51 5.3 Simulating analysis for Rui P 52 5.4 Comparison with Tests of Rui Pu 53 CHAPTER VI CONLUSIONS 55 REFERENCE 57 TABLES 61 FIGURES 67 APPENDIX A Hinge simulation in ETABS program A1 APPENDIX B Column Hinge Simulation Results of Guan Miao A5 APPENDIX C Column Hinge Simulation Results of Rui Pu A31 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 低矮型鋼筋混凝土校舍之耐震側推分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Pushover Analysis of Reinforced Concrete School Building under Earthquake | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉光晏(Kuang-Yen Liu),蕭輔沛(Fu-Pei Hsiao) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 側推方式,耐震評估,鋼筋混凝土校舍,低矮型結構, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | pushover analysis,seismic assessment,reinforced concrete school buildings,low-rise school structures, | en |
dc.relation.page | 147 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.53 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。