Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 外國語文學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57598
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳雅鳳(Ya-Feng Wu)
dc.contributor.authorYa-han Changen
dc.contributor.author張雅涵zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T06:53:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-21
dc.date.copyright2014-08-21
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014-07-21
dc.identifier.citationNatural History and Women’s Education
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford UP, 1987. Print.
Barker, Hannah, and Elaine Chalus. Introduction. Women’s History : Britain, 1700-1850 : An Introduction. Eds. Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus. London: Routledge, 2005. 1-8. Print.
Becker, Lydia E. “Is There any Specific Distinction Between Male and Female Intellect?” Englishwomen Review, no. 8 (1868). Gender and Science: Late Nineteenth Century Debates on the Female Mind and Body. Ed. Katharina Rowold. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1996. 15-22. Print.
Bernstein, Susan David. “‘Supposed Differences’: Lydia Becker and Victorian Women's Participation in the Baas.” Repositioning Victorian Sciences : Shifting Centres in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Thinking. Ed. David Clifford. New York: Anthem Press, 2006. 85-93. Print.
Bewell, Alan. “Erasmus Darwin’s Cosmopolitan Nature.” ELH 76.1 (Spring 2009): 19-48. Print.
---. “Keats’s ‘Realm of Flora.’” Studies in Romanticism 31:1 (Spring 1992): 71-98. Print.
---. “Romanticism and Colonial Natural History.” Studies in Romanticism 43.1 (Spring 2004): 5-34. Print.
Burstyn, Joan N. Victorian Education and the Ideal of Womanhood. London: Croom Helm, 1980. Print.
Coleman, Deirdre. “‘Aetherial Journies, Submarine Exploits’: The Debatable Worlds of Natural History in the Late Eighteenth Century.” Romanticism’s Debatable Lands. Eds. Claire Lamont and Michael Rossington. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 223-236. Print.
Darwin, Erasmus. A Plan for the Conduct of Female Education, in Boarding Schools, Private Families, and Public Seminaries. Printed by John Ormrod, no. 41, Chesnut-Street. 1798. Early American Imprints. Web. 27 June 2013.
Davies, Emilie.”The Influence of University Degrees on the Education of Women.” Victoria Magazine, vol. 1(1863). Gender and Science: Late Nineteenth Century Debates on the Female Mind and Body. Ed. Katharina Rowold. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1996. 1-14. Print.
De, Almeida H. “Romanticism and the Triumph of Life Science: Prospects for Study.” Studies in Romanticism. 43.1 (2004): 119-134. Print.
Evans, Tanya. “Women, Marriage and the Family.” Women’s History : Britain, 1700-1850 : An Introduction. Eds. Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus. London; New York: Routledge, 2005. 57-77. Print.
Endersby, Jim. “Sympathetic Science: Charles Darwin, Joseph Hooker, and the Passions of Victorian Naturalists.” Victorian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Social, Political, and Cultural Studies 51.2 (Winter 2009): 299-320. Print.
Fara, Patricia. “Educating Mary: Women and Scientific Literature in the Early Nineteenth Century.” Frankenstein’s Science : Experimentation and Discovery in Romantic Culture, 1780-1830. Eds. Christa Knellwolf King and Jane R. Goodall. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008. 17-32. Print.
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things : An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Routledge, 2002. Print.
King, Amy Mae. “Taxonomical Cures: The Politics of Natural History and Herbalist Medicine in Elizabeth Gaskell’s Mary Barton.” Romantic Science: The Literary Forms of Natural History. Ed. Noah Heringman. Albany, NY: State U of New York P, 2003. 255-70. Print.
Lynch, John M. ““Scriptural Geology”: Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation and Contested Authority in Nineteenth-Century British Science.” Repositioning Victorian Sciences : Shifting Centres in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Thinking. Ed. David Clifford. New York: Anthem, 2006. 131-41. Print.
Poovey, Mary. Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England. Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P, 1988. Print.
Rendall, Jane. “Women and the Enlightenment in Britain C. 1690-1800.” Women’s History : Britain, 1700-1850 : An Introduction. Eds. Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus. London; New York: Routledge, 2005. 9-32. Print.
Richardson, Alan. Literature, Education, and Romanticism: Reading As Social Practice, 1780-1832. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994. Print.
Roche, Daniel. “Natural History in the Academies.” Cultures of Natural History. Eds. Nicholas Jardine, James A. Secord and E. C. Spary. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 127-44. Print.
Ruston, Sharon. “Natural Rights and Natural History in Anna Barbauld and Mary Wollstonecraft.” Literature and Science. Ed. Sharon Ruston. Cambridge: Brewer, for English Association, 2008. 53-71. Print.
Sheffield, Suzanne Le-May. Women and Science: Social Impact and Interaction. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2004. Print.
Shteir, Ann B. “Defeminizing the Budding Science of Botany, 1830-1860.” Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora’s Daughters and Botany in England, 1760-1860. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1996. 147-170. Print.
Simonton, Deborah. “Women and Education.” Women’s History : Britain, 1700-1850 : An Introduction. Eds. Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus. London; New York: Routledge, 2005. 33-56. Print.
Taylor, Miles. “QueenVictoria and the Victorians.” National Chengchi University. 27 May 2013. Address.
Winter, Alice. “The Construction of Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in the Early Victorian Life Sciences.” Victorian Science in Context. Ed. Lightman, Bernard V. Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P, 1997. 24-50. Print.
Wollstonecraft, Mary, et al. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft: A Vindication of the Rights of Men; a Vindication of the Rights of Woman; Hints. 5 vols. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex Corporation, 2004. Print.
Charlotte Smith
Curran, Stuart. Introduction. The Poems of Charlotte Smith. Women Writers in English 1350–1850. New York: Oxford UP, 1993. xix-xxix. Print.
George, Sam. “Linnaeus in Letters and the Cultivation of the Female Mind: ‘Botany in an English Dress.’” British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 28.1 (Spring 2005): 1-18. Print.
Girten, Kristin M. “Charlotte Smith’s Tactile Poetics.” Eighteenth Century. 54.2 (2013): 215-230. Print.
Kelley, Theresa M. “Romantic Histories: Charlotte Smith and Beachy Head.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 59.3 (Dec. 2004): 281-314. Print.
Kerr, Heather. “Melancholy Botany: Charlotte Smith’s Bioregional Poetic Imaginary.” The Bioregional Imagination: Literature, Ecology, and Place. Eds. Tom Lynch et al. Athens, GA: U of Georgia P, 2012. 181-199. Print.
Labbe, Jacqueline M. Charlotte Smith : Romanticism, Poetry, and the Culture of Gender. Manchestee: Manchester UP, 2003. Print.
Landry, Donna. “Green Languages? Women Poets as Naturalists in 1653 and 1807.” Huntington Library Quarterly: Studies in English and American History and Literature 63.4 (2000): 467-89. Print.
Porter, Dahlia. “From Nosegay to Specimen Cabinet: Charlotte Smith and the Labour of Collecting.” Charlotte Smith in British Romanticism. Ed. Jacqueline M. Labbe. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2008. 29-44. Print.
Ruwe, Donelle R. “Benevolent Brothers and Supervising Mothers: Ideology in the Children’s Verses of Mary and Charles Lamb and Charlotte Smith.” Children’s Literature Children’s Literature 25.1 (1997): 87-115. Print.
Smith, Charlotte, and Stuart Curran. The Works of Charlotte Smith. 14 vols. Brookfield: Pickering & Chatto, 2005. Print.
Smith, Charlotte Turner, and Judith Phillips Stanton. The Collected Letters of Charlotte Smith. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2003. Print.
John Ruskin
Birch, Dinah. “The Ethics of the Dust: Ruskin’s Authorities.” Prose Studies 12.2 (1989): 147-58. Print.
---. “‘What Teachers Do You Give Your Girls?’ Ruskin and Women’s Education.” Ruskin and Gender. Eds. Dinah Birch and Francis O’Gorman. New York: Palgrave, 2002. 121-37. Print.
Craig, David M. “The Politics of Medievalism.” John Ruskin and the Ethics of Consumption. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2006. 202-45. Print.
Gully, Anthony Lacy. “Sermons in Stone: Ruskin and Geology.” John Ruskin and the Victorian Eye. Eds. Susan P.Casteras, Susan Phelps Gordon and Anthony Lacy Gully. New York: Abrams, 1993. 158-83. Print.
Helsinger, Elizabeth. “Ruskin and the Politics of Viewing: Constructing National Subjects.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts Nineteenth-Century Contexts 18.2 (1994): 125-46. Print.
Heringman, Noah. “The Rock Record and Romantic Narratives of the Earth.” Romantic Science: The Literary Forms of Natural History. Ed. Noah Heringman. Albany, NY: State U of New York P, 2003. 53-84. Print.
MacCarthy, Fiona. The Last Pre-Raphaelite : Edward Burne-Jones and the Victorian Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2011. Print.
“Obituary: John Ruskin, M.A., Ll.D., D.C.L., F.G.S.” Geological Magazine (Decade IV) 7.2 (1900): 94-96. Cambridge Journals. Web. 13 June 2013.
O’Gorman, Francis. “‘To See the Finger of God in the Dimensions of the Pyramid’: A New Context for Ruskins’s the Ethics of the Dust (1866).” Modern Language Review 98.3 (2003): 563-73. Print.
Robson, Catherine. “The Stones of Childhood: Ruskin’s ‘Lost Jewels’.” Ruskin and Gender. Eds. Dinah Birch and Francis O’Gorman. New York: Palgrave, 2002. 29-46. Print.
Ruskin, John, Edward Tyas Cook, and Alexander D. O. Wedderburn. The Works of John Ruskin. 39 vols. Tokyo: Hon-No-Tomosha, 1990. Print.
Shuman, Cathy. “‘Preached to Death by a Mad Governess’: Ruskin’s Anti-Exam.”Pedagogical Economies: The Examination and the Victorian Literary Man. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2000. 170-212. Print.
Sullivan, Heather I.. “Collecting the Rocks of Time: Goethe, the Romantics and Early Geology.” European Romantic Review 10.3 (1999): 341-70. Print.
Trowbridge, Caroline. “‘Speakers Concerning the Earth’ : Ruskin’s Geology after 1860.” Repositioning Victorian Sciences : Shifting Centres in Nineteenth-Century Scientific Thinking. Ed. David Clifford. New York: Anthem, 2006. 17-30. Print.
Weltman, Sharon Aronofsky. Ruskin’s Mythic Queen: Gender Subversion in Victorian Culture. Athens, OH: Ohio UP, 1998. Print.
---. Performing the Victorian: John Ruskin and Identity in Theater, Science, and Education. Victorian Critical Interventions. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2007. Print.
Wilson, Eric. The Spiritual History of Ice : Romanticism, Science, and the Imagination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Print.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57598-
dc.description.abstract本論文旨在以夏洛特•史密斯(1749-1806)與約翰•拉斯金(1819-1900)之
作品為例,探討十八世紀末至十九世紀間英國「自然史」與「女性教育」之互動。
自然史起源古希臘羅馬時期,本為研究人與自然關係之綜合型學科,其早期
綜合科學與人文之特性,使學者在書寫間可抒發其政治理念;在十八世紀末至十
九世紀的英國女性教育相關辯論正興之時,自然史即為其提供良好的平台。自然
史發展後受大英帝國海外擴張影響,轉變為一龐大、專業化、分工精細的自然科
學系統,也失去了其哲學與倫理學之色彩;其時女性教育便成為傳統自然史學者
再興其人文特色之途徑。
本論文自史密斯之《詩歌概論對話錄》(1804)與拉斯金之《塵土的倫理》(1865)著手,研究兩自然史與女性教育之兩種互動模式。身為以出版養家糊口的女作家,史密斯於《詩歌概論對話錄》,借自然史之人文特色教導女孩詩學、引導女性關注社會、經濟議題,將女性引領往公領域。為物質化科學憂心的拉斯金,則在《塵土的倫理》中運用女孩與水晶之譬喻,展現人類社會與地質環境之相似性,借女性教育論述對科學研究再人文化之期許。兩部作品出版時間相隔六十年的作品,
呈現了自然史與女性教育的兩種關係。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis delineates the convoluted development of natural history and women’s education in the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Britain, with the focus on the contributions by Charlotte Turner Smith (1749-1806) and John Ruskin (1819-1900).
Natural history, an ancient study rooted in Greco-Roman time, has been refreshed by the expansion of the British Empire and has become a dominant science in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. As an academic discipline dealing with various aspects of nature and humans, the study of natural history became politically charged. Its existence created a platform for debatable issues, including women’s education, which was a popular topic tightly connected to natural history. As the empire expanded, natural history was divided into different disciplines and professionalized, and had lost its metaphysical characteristics. Women’s education became the platform on which scholars could consolidate the metaphysical natural history.
Suggesting that natural history empowered women’s education, and that women’s education could also be used to revive natural history, this thesis focuses on two educational works for girls, Smith’s Conversations Introducing Poetry (1804) and Ruskin’s The Ethics of the Dust (1865). Being a woman who has to support herself and her family with publications, Smith educates girls to approach poetics, economy and social criticism via the metaphysical natural history, and leads them to the observation of the public sphere. Worried by the materializing science, Ruskin displays the similarity between human society and geological environment and tries to revive metaphysical natural history through the analogy of girls and crystals. The two works shows related yet different views on the relationship between natural history and women’s education.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:53:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-103-R00122001-1.pdf: 810387 bytes, checksum: 07e64773badb5955845b92e089aa0719 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgements i

Abstract iii

Table of Contents v


Introduction 1

Chapter One
Natural History and Women’s Education from Late Eighteenth Century to Mid-Nineteenth Century 13

Chapter Two
Natural History and Women’s Education in Charlotte Turner Smith’s Conversations Introducing Poetry 37

Chapter Three
Confirming Authority: Geology and Female Education in John Ruskin’s The Ethics of the Dust 64

Conclusion 86

Works Cited 89
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject女性教育zh_TW
dc.subject自然史zh_TW
dc.subject夏洛特‧史密斯zh_TW
dc.subject約翰‧拉斯金zh_TW
dc.subjectWoman’s Educationen
dc.subjectCharlotte Smithen
dc.subjectJohn Ruskinen
dc.subjectNatural Historyen
dc.title自然史與女性教育:夏洛特•史密斯與約翰•拉斯金zh_TW
dc.titleNatural History and Women's Education: Charlotte
Turner Smith and John Ruskin
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee高瑟濡(She-Ru Kao),陳音頤(Eva Yin-I Chen)
dc.subject.keyword自然史,女性教育,夏洛特‧史密斯,約翰‧拉斯金,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordNatural History,Woman’s Education,Charlotte Smith,John Ruskin,en
dc.relation.page95
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2014-07-21
dc.contributor.author-college文學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept外國語文學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:外國語文學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-103-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
791.39 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved