請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56632
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃尹男(Yin-Nan Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hong-Ming Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳宏銘 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T05:38:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abrahamson, N. A., and Silva, W. J. (1997). 'Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes.' Seismol. Res. Lett., 68(1), 94-126.
American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) (2006). 'Seismic design criteria for structures, Systems, and components in nuclear facilities.' ASCE/SEI 43-05, ASCE, Reston VA, USA. Apsel, R., and Luco, J. (1987). 'Impedance functions for foundations embedded in a layered medium: an integral equation approach.' Earthquake engineering & structural Dynamics, 15(2), 213-231. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2012). 'Seismic performance assessment of buildings. Volume 1 – Methodology.' FEMA P-58 pre-release version, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Washington, D.C. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2005). 'A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon.' Earthquake engineering & structural Dynamics, 34(10), 1193-1217. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006a). 'Correlation of response spectral values for multicomponent ground motions.' Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(1), 215-227. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006b). 'Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.' Earthquake engineering & structural Dynamics, 35(9), 1077-1095. Baker, J. W. (2011). 'Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection.' Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(3), 322-331. Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI) (2006). SAP2000 Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Three-Dimensional Structures-version 14.0. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, California. Chang Y.W., W.Y. Jean, and C.H. Loh (2012). A Comparison of NGA Ground-Motion Prediction models with Taiwan models and Data, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Portugal Lisbon. Chang Y.W., C.H. Loh and W.Y. Jean(2012), Seismic Hazard Re-analysis of Taiwan with the Consideration of Model Parameter Uncertainty, Fifth Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications, Singapore. Engineers, A. s. o. c. (2007). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE Publications. Hancock, J., Watson-Lamprey, J.,Abrahamson, N. A., Boommer, J. J., Markatis, A., McCoy, E., and Mendis, R., (2006). 'An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets.' Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10(S1), 67-89. Huang, Y. N., Whittaker, A. S., and Luco, N. (2010). 'Seismic performance assessment of base‐isolated safety‐related nuclear structures.' Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39(13), 1421-1442. Huang, Y.-N., Whittaker, A. S., Kennedy, R. P., and Mayes, R. L. (2011a). “Analysis and design of seismic isolation systems for nuclear structure.” Proceedings, 21st International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, New Delhi, India. Huang, Y.-N., Whittaker, A. S., and Luco, N. (2011b). 'A probabilistic seismic risk assessment procedure for nuclear power plants: (I) Methodology.' Nuclear Engineering and Design, 241(9), 3996-4003. Huang, Y.-N., Whittaker, A. S., and Luco, N. (2011c). 'A probabilistic seismic risk assessment procedure for nuclear power plants: (II) Application.' Nuclear Engineering and Design. Jayaram, N., Lin, T., and Baker, J. W. (2011). 'A Computationally efficient ground-motion selection algorithm for matching a target response spectrum mean and variance.' Earthquake Spectra, 27(3), 797-815. Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education India. Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C., and Neter, J. (2004). 'Applied Linear Regression Models.' McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, 701 pp. Novak, M., Aboul-Ella, F., and Nogami, T. (1978). 'Dynamic soil reactions for plane strain case.' Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 104(4), 953-959. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), (2011). 'PEER Ground Motion Database.' <http://peer.berkeley.edu/peer_ground_motion_database> Reed, J. W., and Kennedy, R. P. (1994). 'Methodology for developing seismic fragilities.' Final Report TR-103959, EPRI. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), (2008). 2008Interactive Deaggregations(Beta). https://geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2008/ (last verified 03/29/2010) Wood, S. L. (1990). 'Shear strength of low-rise reinforced concrete walls.' ACI Structural Journal, 87(1). Yang, T.Y., Moehle, J., Stojadinovic, B., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2009). Performance evaluation of structural systems: theory and implementation. Journal of Structural Engineering 135 (10), 1146–1154. 游青青,「新一代核能電廠耐震機率風險評估與餘熱移除系統耐震行為研究」,碩士論文,國立台灣大學,台北(2014)。 強震測站場址工程地質資料庫,http://egdt.ncree.org.tw/。 中央氣象局地球物理資料管理系統,http://gdms.cwb.gov.tw/index.php。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56632 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Huang與Whittaker等人所提出之新一代地震機率式風險評估之流程與方法(Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment, SPRA)(Huang et al. 2011a、2011b),此一套新式SPRA (簡稱HW SPRA)以結構反應參數定義易損性曲線,並利用動力歷時分析求得結構反應,增加核能電廠耐震風險評估之可靠性。目前業界對核能電廠進行耐震風險評估時,所使用的都是以UHS(Uniform Hazard Spectrum)做為目標反應譜之人工地震歷時進行動力分析,其中並無考慮反應譜不同週期之相關性及離散性等影響譜形之因素。
針對以上之現況,本研究利用HW SPRA方法評估一案例核能電廠因地震導致爐心受損之風險,並針對目標加速度反應譜譜形對風險分析結果之影響進行討論。本研究主要重點在於使用不同目標反應譜之地震歷時群進行非線性動力分析以及計算電廠之爐心受損之風險,最後觀察其對於台灣核能電廠地震風險評估之結果的影響程度。本研究中以強度、離散性以及是否考慮反應譜不同週期間之相關性等影響譜形之因素,共建立以下4組地震歷時群: (a) CS(Conditional Spectrum)群,此群以CMS(Conditional Mean Spectrum)作為目標反應譜,此群地震歷時考慮了反應譜之相關性,且整體的反應譜之中位數值與目標反應譜一致,此外,此群中每一筆地震歷時皆考慮了反應譜之不確定性。 (b) CMS_A群與 (c) CMS_B群,此兩群以CMS作為目標反應譜,皆以數值軟體將其轉換成符合CMS之人工地震歷時,故此兩群皆無考慮反應譜之離散性。然而,此兩群中最大的不同處是垂直方向上之目標反應譜在強度上會有所差異,因為在本研究中所選定之事故序列中有許多設備元件受垂直向反應影響甚鉅。此外,本研究亦建立了計算以上三群之目標反應譜(CMS)所需之適用於台灣本地之加速度反應譜相關係數模型。 (d) UHS群,以UHS作為目標反應譜,並以數值軟體將其轉換成符合UHS之人工地震歷時,故此群並無考慮反應譜之相關性及離散性。 透過本研究分析結果之比較,相較於CMS_A群、UHS群集CMS_B群未考慮反應譜離散性之因素,CS群之地震歷時考慮了反應譜週期間之相關性以及反應譜於條件週期外之反應譜不確定性,此不確定性影響結構反應的離散性與風險計算結果甚鉅,導致等級1~4等較低之地震強度,其爐心受損機率大於其他群之受損機率。最終CS群之爐心受損風險大於譜形較為保守之UHS群之風險,為4群中最高者。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Seismic probabilistic risk assessment (SPRA) has been widely used to compute the core damage frequency of a nuclear power plant (NPP). In this study, seismic risk of a sample NPP is computed using a SPRA methodology proposed by Huang, Whittaker and Luco in 2011. The methodology requires response-history analysis, which often involves the selection and scaling of ground motions for a target spectrum. The use of artificial ground acceleration time series spectrum-matched to a uniform hazard spectrum (UHS) does not consider the correlation in spectral accelerations at different periods and has been criticized to be significantly conservative for some purpose.
In this thesis, the impact of spectral shape of a target response spectrum on the result of SPRA was studied. The seismic risk was defined as the occurrence of a sample accident sequence for the sample NPP. Four sets of ground motions were developed for this purpose: (a) CS Group. The target spectrum for this group was developed using the Conditional-Spectrum (CS) concept. The distribution of spectral acceleration at a given period for the ground motions in the CS Group fits both the median and dispersion required in the target CS. (b) CMS_A Group and (c) CMS_B Group. The target spectra for the two groups were developed using the Conditional-Mean-Spectrum (CMS) concept and are the same in the horizontal directions and different in the vertical direction. Each ground motion in the two groups is artificial time series spectrum-matched to the target CMS. A prediction model for correlation coefficients for spectral accelerations at different periods was proposed for ground motions recorded in Taiwan and used to develop the target CMS used in this study. (d) UHS Group. Each ground motion in this group artificial time series spectrum-matched to a target UHS. The dispersion in spectral acceleration of ground motions for the CS Group has significant impact on the dispersions in the structural responses and the risk of the sample NPP. The seismic risk of the sample NPP for the CS Group is higher than that for the other groups. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:38:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01521206-1.pdf: 12195366 bytes, checksum: f4d608fad94379f3665d1156314c76fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
論文口試委員審定書 i 誌謝 iii 摘要 v Abstract vii 目錄 ix 表目錄 xiii 圖目錄 xv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究方法 3 1.3 論文結構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 條件平均反應譜 5 2.1.1 地表運動強度離散性參數 5 2.1.2 反應譜不同週期間之相關係數 7 2.1.3 計算條件平均反應譜之主要流程 7 2.2 新一代地震機率式風險評估 9 2.2.1 核電廠系統分析 10 2.2.2 地震危害度分析 11 2.2.3 非線性反應歷時分析 13 2.2.4 元件損傷評估 13 2.2.5 地震風險量化計算 14 第三章 台灣地表運動譜加速度之相關係數模型 22 3.1 地震歷時資料庫之建立 22 3.2 實際地震紀錄之相關係數計算 23 3.2.1 譜加速度衰減律之介紹 23 3.2.2 資料庫A、B相關係數之計算結果 23 3.3 美國相關係數模型之說明與比較 24 3.3.1 Baker and Cornell’s Model 24 3.3.2 Abrahamson’s Model 24 3.3.3 台灣歷時資料與美國相關係數模型之比較 25 3.4 台灣之相關係數模型 25 3.4.1 適用於台灣一般地表運動(資料庫A)之相關係數模型 25 3.4.2 適用於台灣較具破壞性地表運動(資料庫B)之相關係數模型 26 3.4.3 資料庫A與資料庫B相關係數計算結果之探討 27 3.5 相關係數之討論 27 3.5.1 集集主震之影響 27 3.5.2 負相關係數之討論 28 第四章 地震歷時之縮放與挑選 43 4.1 前言 43 4.2 美國ASCE/SEI 43-05對於人工地震歷時之規範 44 4.3 CS群 45 4.3.1 CS群之目標反應譜 45 4.3.2 CS群之地震歷時挑選 46 4.4 CMS_A群 48 4.4.1 CMS_A群之目標反應譜 48 4.4.2 CMS_A群之地震歷時挑選 49 4.5 UHS群 49 4.5.1 UHS群之目標反應譜 49 4.5.2 UHS群之地震歷時挑選 50 4.6 CMS_B群 50 4.6.1 CMS_B群之目標反應譜 50 4.6.2 CMS_B群之地震歷時挑選 50 第五章 示範例之核能電廠介紹 89 5.1 反應爐廠房 89 5.1.1 結構系統 89 5.1.2 數值分析模型 90 5.2 控制廠房 95 5.2.1 結構系統 95 5.2.2 數值分析模型 95 第六章 地震機率式風險評估示範例 111 6.1 示範例核電廠之系統分析 111 6.2 地震危害度分析與地震歷時之建立 112 6.3 反應歷時分析 112 6.4 計算目標事件發生之機率 113 6.4.1 以增廣需求矩陣進行蒙地卡羅試驗 113 6.5 風險計算之結果 117 6.6 反應歷時分析結果探討 117 6.6.1 考慮反應譜值之不確定性對分析結果之影響 117 6.6.2 垂直向目標反應譜對分析結果之影響 119 6.6.3 考慮反應譜週期間之相關性對分析結果之影響 122 6.6.4 小結 123 第七章 結論與建議 153 7.1 結論 153 7.2 建議 154 參考文獻 155 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 地表加速度反應譜譜形對核能電廠風險評估之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of Spectral Shapes of Ground Motions on Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 簡文郁(Wen-Yu Chien),柴駿甫(Juin-Fu Chai) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 核能電廠,機率式耐震風險評估,非線性動力分析,條件平均反應譜,相關係數, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Nuclear power plant,seismic probabilistic risk assessment,conditional mean spectrum,nonlinear-history analysis,correlation coefficient, | en |
dc.relation.page | 157 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 11.91 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。