請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55619完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭麗珍(Li-Chen Cheng) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Teng-Ju Ku | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 古登儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T04:13:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 內政部（2013）。內政部統計年報。
方孝鼎（2011）。 遊民身體與習性的自我照顧與社會規訓-臺灣遊民服務的觀察筆記。「2011文化研究學會年會」發表之論文，新北市真理大學。 王勇智、鄧明宇（譯）（2003）C. A. Riessman（著）。敘說分析。台北：五南 王金永（譯）（2000）Padgett, D。 K。（著）質化研究與社會工作。臺北：洪葉 石桂榕（2008）。遊民問題之研究---以臺北縣為例。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，台北市。 吳欽仁（2007）。社會救助體系下的遊民現況及業務問題探討－以臺北縣為例。（未出版之碩士論文）。東吳大學，台北市。 吳健瑋（2011）。山中百合花：原住民生涯復元之敘事研究。國立政治大學，台北市。 李易駿（2007）。臺灣社會排除人口之推估。人口學刊，35，75-112。 李軍豪（2013）。長刑期受刑人自我效能、在監適應對復歸認知之影響研究。（位出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。 林萬億（1995）。遊民問題之調查分析。行政院研究發展考核委員會。台北市：行政院研考會 林儹紘（2008）。從社會復歸觀點論長刑期之受刑人處遇。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義。 周震歐（1993）。犯罪社會學。台北：黎明文化事業公司。 吳芝儀（譯）（2008）。A. Lieblich, & R. T.Mashiach, & T. Zilber（1998）著。敘事研究：閱讀、分析與詮釋。嘉義：濤石。 陳若平、張祐綾等人（譯）（2007）。Rubin, A。, & Babbie, E。 R。（2005）著。社會工作研究法。臺北市 : 湯姆生出版。 郭仲珈（2012）。遊民使用社會福利服務之經驗與轉變：以大臺北地區為例。（未出版之碩士論文），國立臺灣大學，台北市。 施教裕（2002）生態系統觀點，出自宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍等， 社會工作理論－處遇模式與案例分析，213∼247，台北：洪葉。 陳大衛（2000）。臺灣遊民問題的結構分析。（未出版之碩士論文），世新大學，台北市。 陳怡伶（2004）。不當遊民戲人間 自喻阿寶重生緣。中國時報。 陳怡靜（2007）。 更生保護工作執行現況之探索。（未出版之碩士論文），國立中正大學，嘉義。 陳珮綺（2010）。創傷性腦傷者就業歷程之敘事研究。（未出版之碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。 黃志仁（2012）。遊民接受社會服務經驗之探究。（未出版之碩士論文），長榮大學，台南市。 黃宗旻（2004）。臺灣更生保護制度之研究。（未出版之碩士論文），國立臺灣大學，台北。 臺灣社會工作專業人員協會（2011）。社會工作研究倫理守則（建議版）。from http://www.tasw.org.tw/eweb/uploadfile/20111116170126173.pdf 蘇子敏（2009）。生命意義的思考與盼望~肢體障礙者生命故事之敘事研究。（未出版碩士），國立彰化師範大學復健諮商研究所，彰化縣。 劉松霖、林佳瑩（2007）。全國減刑�減刑無家可歸 20更生人流浪街頭。TVBS電視台。from http://news.tvbs.com.tw/entry/312022 潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。台北市：心理出版社。 潘淑滿（2005）。飄浪人生：遊民、家與公共政策。臺灣社會工作學刊，4，172-198。 鄭麗珍（2004）。遊民問題調查、分析與對策研究。行政院內政部社會司委託研究報告，未出版。 鄭麗珍（2012）。更生人家庭支持系統建構之研究，法務部委託研究報告，未出版。 鄭麗珍（2013）。遊民生活狀況調查。台北：行政院內政部社會司。 謝瑤偉（1999）。出獄人就業調查報告。台北市：法務部犯罪研究中心。 嚴健彰（2003）。出獄人復歸社會更生歷程之研究─從復原力的觀點探討之─。 （未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義。 Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Methodological Review of Counting the Homeless, 2006, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue No. 2050.0.55.001. Baldry,E., D. M., Maplestone, P and Peeters, M. (2006). Ex-prisoner, Homelessness and the State in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(1), 20-33. Bushway, S. D. (2007). Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post-Industrial America. America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Blid, M., Gerdner, A. and Bergmark, A. (2008). Prediction of homelessness and housing provisions in Swedish municipalities. European Journal of Housing Policy, 8, 399-421. Bruner, J. (1991). The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1-21. doi: 10.2307/1343711 Byrne, S., E. A. M., Jamison D. Fargo, Ann E. Montgomery,Dennis P. Culhane. (2013). New Perspectives on Community-Level Determinant of Homelessness. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(5), 607-625. Chamberlain, C. and MacKenzie, D. (1992) Understanding Contemporary Homelessness: Issues of Definition and Meaning, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 27(4), 274–297. Chamberlain, C and MacKenzie, D. (2008) Counting the Homeless 2006,Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue No. 2050.0. Curtis, M.A, and Geller, A (2010). A Sort of Homecoming: Incarceration and the housing security of urban men. Social Science Research, 40, 1196-1213. Cho, R. (2004). Putting the Pieces Back Together: Overcoming Fragmentation to Prevent Post-Incarceration Homelessness New York: Corporation for Supportive Housing. Cnaan, R. A., Draine, J., Frazier, B., & Sinha, J. W. (2008). Ex-Prisoners' Re-Entry: An Emerging Frontier and a Social Work Challenge. Journal of Policy Practice, 7(2-3), 178-198. doi: 10.1080/15588740801938035 Daly, G., (1996). Homeless: Polices, Strategies, and Lives on the Street. London, UK: Routledge. Dyb, E. (2009). Imprisonment : A Major Gateway to Homelessness. Housing Studies, 24(6), 809-824. FEANTSA. (2008). 2011 Round of Population and Housing Censuses FEANTSA Recommendations for the enumeration of homeless people on census night. from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/censuskb20/Attachments/2008FEANTSA-GUIDc4b786452dba4e849a3615171c04450e.pdf Fitzpatrick, S. Kemp, P., & Klinker, S. (2000). Single homelessness: An overview of research in Britain. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. Fischer PJ.(1988). Criminal activity among the homeless: a study of arrests in Baltimore. Hosp Community Psychiatry 39(1), 46–51. Gowan, T. (2003). The nexus: Homelessness and incarceration in two American cities. Ethnography, 3, 500-534 Gunnison &Helfgott (2011). Factors That Hinder Offender Reentry Success: A View From Community Corrections Officers.International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology55(2), 287-304. Helfgott, J.(1997). Ex-offender Needs versus Community Opportunity in Seattle, Washington. Federal Probation 61(2):12-24. Heerde, J. A., & Hemphill, S. A. (2013). Stealing and being stolen from: Perpetration of property offenses and property victimization among homeless youth-A systematic review. Youth & Society, june 5. Hertzberg, E. L. (1992). 'The homeless in the United States: conditions, typology and interventions', International Social Work 35: 149-61 Herzog,J. R., C.-B. L., Sansone F. A. and Olson M. (2012). Homelessness and Incarceration: An Examination of Barriers to Misdemeanor Resolution for the Homeless.International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 198-206. Jencks, C. (1994). The Homeless. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kushel, M.B., R. Gupta, L. Gee, and J.S. Haas. 2005. 'Housing Instability and Food Insecurity as Barriers to Health Care Among Low-Income Americans.' Journal of General Internal Medicine 21(1):71-77. Matraux, S. D. P. C. (2004). Homeless Shelter Use and Reincarceration Following Prison Release: Assessing the Risk. Criminology & Public Policy Sciences, 3(2), 139-160. Matraux, S. D. P. C. (2006). Recent Incarceration History Among a Sheltered Homeless Population. Crime & Delinquency, 52(3), 504-517. Matraux. S, C. G. R., Cho. R. (2007). Incarceration and homelessness National Symposium on Homelessness Research. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Maruna, S. and Immarigeon, M. (2004)Ex-offender Reintegration: Theory and Practice,New York, NY: Routledge. Mishler, E. G. (1986) Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press. Myrstol, K. M. F. a. B. (2011). The Jailing of America’s Homeless: Evaluating the Rabble Management Thesis. Crime & Delinquency, 57(2), 271-297. Novac, S., Hermer, J., Paradis, E., & Kellen, A. (2007). A revolving door? Homeless people and the justice system in Toronto. Research Bulletin #36. Toronto: Centre for Urban and Community Studies. Retreived June 21, 2013, from http://www.urbancentre. utoronto.ca/ Nyamathi, A. (2011). Correlates of Depressive Symptoms among Homeless Men on Parole. Issues Ment Health Nurs, 32(8), 501-511. . Roman C. G. &Travis J. (2006). Where will I sleep tomorrow? Housing, homelessness, and the returning prisoner. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 389-418. Rosenheck, G. a. (2008). Jail Incarceration, Homeless, and Mental Health: A National Study. Psychiatric Services, 59(2), 170-177. Rowlands, L. (2011). Looking Through the Eyes of a Homeless Prisoner , Exploring Homeless Offender ’ s Perspectives on their Transition from Custody to Community. Dublin Institute of Technology. Schetzer, S and StreetCare (2013). Beyond the prison gates - the experiences of people recently released from prisoninto homelessness and housing crisis. Sydney: Public Interest Advocacy Centre. Penfold, C., N. D.,Dixon, J.,Webster, S., Jones, A. & Thomas, A.S.(2009). Homelessness prevention and meeting housing need for (ex)offenders. A guide to practice.London: Government of United Kingdom. Petersilia, J. (2003) When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry.Oxford: Oxford University Press Snow, D. A., Baker, S.G.,& Anderson, L. (1989). Criminality and Homeless Men: An Empirical Assessment. Social Problems, 36, 532-549. Speiglman, R. (1999). Homeless and non-homeless arrestee: Distinctions in prevalence and in sociodemographic,drug use, and arrest characteristics across DUF sites. Tipple, G. (2005). Housing and Urban Vulnerability in Rapidly-Developing Cities. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 13(2), 66-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2005.00458.x Tsai, R. A. R. a. J. (2012). Incarceration Among Chronically Homeless Adults: Clinical Correlates and Outcomes. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12, 307-324. Weiser SD, N. T., Comfort ML, Dilworth SE, Cohen J, Tulsky JP and Riley ED. (2009). Gender-Specific Correlates of Incarceration Among Marginally Housed Individuals in San Francisco. American Journal of public health, 99(8), 1459. Western, B. (2006)Punishment and Inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55619 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 更生人與遊民同屬於飽受社會污名的群體，然而這兩者的關係似乎相當微妙。國外研究指出，更生人遭遇居住不穩定的狀況遠高於一般未有前科者，因此開始討論更生遊民的議題。台灣雖未有正式研究，然而在一些電視報導及相關報告中也發現確實有些更生人出監適應不良而成了遊民。基於對更生人如何變成遊民的好奇，本研究採用敘事研究探討更生遊民出監復歸社會的歷程，以4位曾經出監後而開始流浪或居住不穩定者（更生遊民）的生命故事出發，以第三人稱的口吻描述他們的生長背景，乃至後來犯罪、入監服刑及復歸社會的歷程。經分析討論後發現，受訪者的生命經驗皆為衰退的故事，其轉捩點多為入罪服刑。前科影響受訪者的生命深遠，雖然他們皆為法律明令的犯罪者，卻有著受害者的遭遇，而復歸社會歷程中遭遇許多阻力及助力。
依據研究發現與分析獲得以下結論： 一、藥物成癮者成為遊民的樣貌 （一）藥癮歷史、生長環境與家人關係 （二）毒癮的依賴性令開銷過大，以致於得從事非法工作以獲取鉅額報酬 （三）藥物成癮者向下螺旋的生活樣態 二、更生遊民再涉入犯罪事件的脈絡 三、復歸社會的四大阻力及三大助力 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Being a homeless person is stigmatized because of visible presence. But being a homeless person with criminal record is even more stigmatized for his unlawful sin. Many studies indicated that ex-offenders, compared with non-offenders, experience higher risk of unstable living and homelessness. In Taiwan, over 50% of the homeless had criminal records. But, few studies have contributed to further understanding how homeless ex-offenders became homeless after they exited from jails. This study aims to explore how homeless ex-offenders reintegrated into communities and what kind of dynamics drew them into streets.
To know how ex-offenders becoming homeless, the study used narrative research approach to data collecting. Four homeless ex-offenders, referred by outreach works, were in-depth interviewed. Results indicate that the ex-offenders becoming homeless is a long term process of downturn swirling. In the early developmental stage, the disadvantaged environment they grew up has contributed to their first unlawful acts such as drug use or thefts. However, it was the continued unlawful acts and imprisonment times that brought them away from their families and friends. Finding a place to live for the nights became more difficult after they got out of jail. Obstacles and strengths are found in the process of their re-entries. As follows: 1. The process that drug-abusers become homelessness. (1)History of drug-abuse, living environment and family relationship. (2)To meet addiction to adopt illegal ways earing money. (3)The wandering life of drug-abuser presents downward spiral of survival. 2. The context of homeless ex-offender involving crime events. 3. Four obstacles and three strengths in the process of their re-entries. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T04:13:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R00330020-1.pdf: 1594340 bytes, checksum: 66a122a266365e6824d2c78de6f97dcc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I
中文摘要 II 英文摘要 III 目錄 IV 圖、表目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 前言 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 2 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 遊民的樣態 6 第二節 更生人的遊民風險 18 第三節 更生遊民復歸社會的歷程及議題 21 第三章 研究方法 30 第一節 研究方法的選擇 30 第二節 研究設計 32 第三節 研究角色與倫理 45 第四章 研究發現與分析 49 第一節 四位曾經流浪或即將無家可歸者的生命故事 49 一、歹路不可行：進仔的故事 49 二、浪子回頭金不換：阿良的故事 52 三、問世間「情」為何物，直教人生死相許：大胖的故事 57 四、貧窮、毒品、監獄：華哥的生命故事 60 第二節 返家路迢遙：更生遊民復歸社會的歷程 62 一、更生遊民是犯罪者還是受害者？62 二、復歸社會的歷程與經驗 65 第五章 結論與建議 79 第一節 研究結論 79 第二節 研究建議 82 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 83 參考文獻 85 附錄一 訪談大綱 92 附錄二 知情同意書 93 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 污名 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會復歸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 更生人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 遊民 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 敘事研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | homeless | en |
| dc.subject | ex-offender | en |
| dc.subject | stigma | en |
| dc.subject | re-entry | en |
| dc.subject | narritive research | en |
| dc.title | 更生遊民復歸社會的歷程：返家路迢遙 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Homeless ex-offender re-entry process:Hard way home | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林萬億(Wan-I Lin),潘淑滿(Shu-Man Pan) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 遊民,更生人,污名,社會復歸,敘事研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | homeless,ex-offender,stigma,re-entry,narritive research, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 93 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 社會工作學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.56 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。