請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55164完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陸洛 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hao-Lin Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊皓霖 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:49:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-03-13 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-01-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
尤詒君 （1996）： 《雙工作家庭的事務分工-一個質化的分析觀點》。國立台灣大學社會學研究所，碩士論文。 方思文（1999）：《影響台灣地區男女兩性家務參與因素之探討》。台灣大學農業推廣學研究所，碩士論文。 王行 （1997）：〈台灣地區已婚男性對夫妻性別角色觀念之研究〉。《東吳大學社會工作學報》（台灣），3期，47-78。 朱美珍（2002）：《民生主義社會政策與軍人家庭關係之研究--已婚軍官角色衝突及其生活滿意之分析》。政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所，博士論文。 利翠珊、張妤玥（2010）：〈代間照顧關係：台灣都會地區成年子女的質性訪談研究〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，23卷1期，99-124。 呂玉瑕、伊慶春（2005）：〈社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工: 台灣七○ 年代與九○ 年代社會文化脈絡的比較〉。《臺灣社會學》，10期，41-94。 李美枝（1998）：〈中國人親子關係的內涵與功能：以大學生為例〉。《本土心理學研究》，9期，3-52。 李美枝、鐘秋玉（1996）：〈性別與性別角色析論〉。《本土心理學研究》，6期，260-299。 周玉敏（2001）：《性別角色、生活情境與兩性家務分工研究》。東吳大學社會學系，碩士論文。 周玟琪（1994）：《影響台灣地區家務分工因素之探討》。台灣大學社會學研究所，碩士論文。 唐先梅（2001）：〈雙薪家庭夫妻在不同家務項目之分工情形及個人影響因素〉。《生活科學學報》，7卷，105-131。 張思嘉（2006）：〈家庭與婚姻：台灣心理學研究的現況與趨勢〉。《本土心理學研究》，26期，3-34。 曹中瑋（1984）：《自我狀態、夫妻溝通型態與婚姻滿意度之相關研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育心理研究所，碩士論文。 陳明穗、陳彰儀（1987）：〈家庭型態､夫妻知覺與婚姻滿足之關係〉。《教育與心理研究》，10期，61-83。 陳秉華、游淑瑜（2001）：〈台灣的家庭文化與家庭治療〉。《亞洲輔導學報》，8卷2期，153-174。 陸洛、黃茂丁、高旭繁（2005）：〈工作與家庭的雙向衝突：前因、後果及調節變項之探討〉。《應用心理研究》，27期，133-166。 黃馨慧（2000）：〈臺灣成年男性婚姻觀及其家務參與之研究〉。《中華家政學刊》，29期，59-80。 葉光輝、楊國樞（1991）：〈孝道認知結構組型之分析〉。《國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學》，1卷1期，32-51。 張婷婷、陸洛（2009）：〈資源損失與資源獲得對職家衝突之影響：資源保存理論的觀點〉，《臺大管理論叢》，20卷1期，69-98。 蕭淑惠、陳若琳（2010）：〈國小高年級學童知覺家庭功能與家庭滿意度之相關研究〉。《輔仁民生學誌》，16卷2期，95-110。 Andrews, A., & Bailyn, L. (1993). Segmentation and synergy: Two models of linking work and family.In J. Hood (Ed.), Men, work and family(pp.262-275). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Antill, J. K. (1983). Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 145-155. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. Baral, R., & Bhargava, S. (2010). Work-family enrichment as a mediator between organizational interventions for work-life balance and job outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(3), 274-300. Barling, J., & Sorensen, D. (1997). Work and family: In search of a relevant research agenda. In C. L. Cooper & S. E. Jackson (Eds), Creating tomorrow’s organizations: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior (pp. 157–169). New York: Wiley. Becker, P. E., & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(4), 995-1007. Beehr, T. A., & McGrath, J. E. (1992). Social support, occupational stress and anxiety. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 5(1), 7-19. doi: 10.1080/10615809208250484 Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Wethington, E. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 175-183. Burley, K. A. (1995). Family variables as mediators of the relationship between work-family conflict and marital adjustment among dual-career men and women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135(4), 483-497. Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009 Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (Eds.) (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions (Vol. 3508). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002 Carver, M. D., & Jones, W. H. (1992). The Family Satisfaction Scale. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 20(2), 71-83. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Spillover and crossover of exhaustion and life satisfaction among dual-earner parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 266-289. Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(2), 85-129. Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in nursing science, 8(1), 15-24. Friedman, S. D., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2000). Work and family--allies or enemies? what happens when business professionals confront life choices. New York: Oxford University Press. Frone, M. R. (2003). In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetric (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 143-162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Frone, M. R., Yardley, J. K., & Markel, K. S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2), 145-167. Geurts, S. A. E., & Demerouti, E. (2003). Work/non-work interface: A review of theories and findings. In M. J. Schabracq, J. A. M. Winnubst & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of work and health psychology (pp. 279-312). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of management review, 10(1), 76-88. Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research on work, family, and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. N. Powell(Ed.), Handbook of gender & work (pp.391-412). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of management review, 31(1), 72-92. Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work–family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111-126. Gwozdz, W. (2007). Why has a reduction in housework for women not led to an equal division of housework between sexes. Paper presented in: International Time Use Research Conference (IATUR) October 17-19 2007. Washington DC. U.S.A. Hair, J. F. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513. Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421. Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (2001). Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 57-80). New York: Marcel Dekker. House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling : Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M. (1995). Vagal tone protects children from marital conflict. Development and Psychopathology, 7(01), 83-92. King, L. A., Mattimore, L. K., King, D. W., & Adams, G. A. (1995). Family support inventory for workers: A new measure of perceived social support from family members. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 235-258. Kurdek, L. A. (1992). Dimensionality of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Evidence from heterosexual and homosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 6(1), 22-35. Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 825-841. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.012 Lu, J. F., Siu, O. L., Spector, P. E., & Shi, K. (2009). Antecedents and outcomes of a fourfold taxonomy of work-family balance in Chinese employed parents. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(2), 182-192. doi: 10.1037/a0014115 Lu, L., Kao, S.-F., Chang, T.-T., Wu, H.-P., & Cooper, C. L. (2008). Work/family demands, work flexibility, work/family conflict, and their consequences at work: A national probability sample in Taiwan. International Journal of Stress Management, 15(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.15.1.1 Lu, L., Kao, S. F., Cooper, C. L., Allen, T. D., Lapierre, L. M., O'Driscoll, M., . . . Spector, P. E. (2009). Work resources, work-to-family conflict, and its consequences: A Taiwanese-British cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Stress Management, 16(1), 25-44. doi: 10.1037/a0013988 Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 921-936. McNall, L. A., Nicklin, J. M., & Masuda, A. D. (2009). A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work–family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 381-396. doi: 10.1007/s10869-009-9141-1 Measor, L., & Sikes, P. J. (1992). Gender and schools. London, UK: Cassell. Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2002). Handbook of research design and social measurement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Minuchin, P., Colapinto, J., & Minuchin, S. (2009). Working with families of the poor. New York: Guilford Press. Murstein, B. I., & Williams, P. D. (1985). Assortative matching for sex-role and marriage adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(2), 195-201. Pleck, J. H. (1977). The work-family role system. Social problems, 417-427. Poelmans, S., Stepanova, O., & Masuda, A. (2008). Positive spillover between personal and professional life: Definitions, antecedents, consequences, and strategies. In K. Korabik, D. S. Lero, D. L.Whitehead, (Eds.), Handbook of work-family integration: Research, theory, and best practices (141-156). London, UK:Elsevier. Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 513-534. Repetti, R. L. (1989). Effects of daily workload on subsequent behavior during marital interaction: the roles of social withdrawal and spouse support. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(4), 651. Richard, L. S., Wakefield Jr, J. A., & Lewak, R. (1990). Similarity of personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction: A Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) item analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(1), 39-43. Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655-684. Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., Panzer, K., & King, S. N. (2002). Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 369-386. Russell, R. J., & Wells, P. A. (1991). Personality similarity and quality of marriage. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(5), 407-412. Shockley, K. M., & Singla, N. (2011). Reconsidering work-family interactions and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 861-886. doi: 10.1177/0149206310394864 Sieber, S. D. (1974). Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 567-578. Siu, O.-L., Lu, J.-F., Brough, P., Lu, C.-Q., Bakker, A. B., Kalliath, T., . . . Shi, K. (2010). Role resources and work–family enrichment: The role of work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 470-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.06.007 Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 15-28. ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work-home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545-556. doi: 10.1037/a0027974 van Emmerik, I. H., & Peeters, M. C. (2009). Crossover specificity of team-level work-family conflict to individual-level work-family conflict. Journal of managerial psychology, 24(3), 254-268. Viswesvaran, C., Sanchez, J. I., & Fisher, J. (1999). The role of social support in the process of work stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(2), 314-334. Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2007). Work–family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 63-76. Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the big five to work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 108-130. doi: 10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00035-6 Wayne, J. H., Randel, A. E., & Stevens, J. (2006). The role of identity and work–family support in work–family enrichment and its work-related consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 445-461. Westman, M. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54(6), 717-751. doi: 10.1177/0018726701546002 Westman, M, & Etzion, D. (2005). The crossover of work‐family conflict from one spouse to the other. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(9), 1936-1957. Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (1995). Crossover of stress, strain and resources from one spouse to another. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 169-181. Westman, M., & Vinokur, A. D. (1998). Unraveling the relationship of distress levels within couples: Common stressors, empathic reactions, or crossover via social interaction? Human Relations, 51(2), 137-156. Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (1999). The crossover of strain from school principals to teachers and vice versa. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(3), 269-278. Westman, M., Vinokur, A. D., Hamilton, V. L., & Roziner, I. (2004). Crossover of marital dissatisfaction during military downsizing among Russian army officers and their apouses. Journal of Applied Psycjology,89(5),769-779. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55164 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討夫妻角色分工共識與職家增益和家庭滿意度之關聯，並進一步探討職家增益對家庭滿意度在夫妻配對中之跨界效果。本研究以配對夫妻共同的角色分工共識作為自變項，研究其對夫妻各自家庭滿意度的影響，並探討職家增益是否具有中介效果。
本研究以台灣地區育有子女的雙薪配對夫妻為樣本，進行結構性問卷的施測，共回收490 人，即245 對夫妻之有效問卷。透過個人與伴侶相互依賴模式(Actor-Partner Interdependence Model, APIM)分析顯示，夫妻角色分工共識對個人FWE 有顯著正向關聯。FWE 在夫妻角色分工共識與家庭滿意度之關聯中具有部份中介效果。無論對丈夫或妻子而言，自身FWE 行動者效果的影響皆大於來自配偶FWE 伴侶效果之影響。文末亦根據研究結果對管理意涵及未來研究提供建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of conjugal congruence on FWE and family satisfaction. In addition, we also examined the crossover of FWE from husbands to wives and vice versa. We used FWE for examining the existence of mediation effects in between conjugal congruence and family satisfaction. Therefore, we used conjugal congruence as independent variable, FWE as mediator variable, and family satisfaction as dependent variable to probe into the relation among the conjugal congruence, FWE and family satisfaction.
By using the structured questionnaires, 490(245 pairs) of married couples in Taiwan, who is in double-income family with children, returned valid responses. The APIM analysis showed that there is significant positive correlation between the conjugal congruence and FWE. FWE partially mediated the relationships between conjugal congruence and family satisfaction .Furthermore, actor effect is stronger than partner effect in terms of both the husband or the wife. We also provided some practical recommendations for organizations and future research at the end of this study. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:49:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R00741064-1.pdf: 3506867 bytes, checksum: e49043c0d163bb8aa0872cc2f91e2767 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 一、 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 二、 文獻回顧 4 第一節 職家增益的定義及其歷程 4 第二節 FWE對家庭滿意度的影響：夫妻配對比較 15 三、 研究方法 19 第一節 研究架構與研究假設 19 第二節 研究對象 20 第三節 研究工具 20 第四節 資料分析 22 四、 研究結果 23 第一節 樣本描述 23 第二節 研究變項描述性統計分析 28 第三節 變項間之相關性分析 30 第四節 結構方程模式分析結果 33 五、 結論與建議 38 第一節 研究結果討論 38 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 39 第三節 管理意涵與結論 40 參考文獻 42 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 夫妻角色分工共識對職家增益與家庭滿意度的影響：夫妻配對APIM模式之比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impacts of Conjugal Congruence on FWE and Family Satisfaction | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳欣蓓,張婷婷 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 夫妻,分工共識,家庭滿意,職家增益,家庭－工作增益,APIM 模式, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | couples,conjugal congruence,work and family enrichment,family-to-work enrichment,WFE,FWE,family satisfaction,APIM, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 53 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-01-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。