Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55022
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳文方 | |
dc.contributor.author | Shao-Kang Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃紹綱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:44:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-13 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-02-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
[1] 中華民國101年能源統計手冊,經濟部能源局,台北,2013。 [6] 陳輝俊、何岳泉、周淑娟,台灣能源技術服務(ESCO)產業六年回顧,台科大圖書股份有限公司,2011。 [8] 陳力揚,能源技術服務模式於綠島LED路燈節能績效之研究,國立台灣大學工業工程學研究所碩士論文,2012。 [9] 詹佩穎,溫室氣體抵換專案導入能源技術服務商業模式之研究—以綠島採用LED路燈為例,國立台灣大學工業工程學研究所碩士論文,2013。 [10] 林旅寧,能源技術服務產業於離島民宿之節能績效研究與商業模式探討,國立台灣大學工業工程學研究所碩士論文,2013。 [11] 蕭代基、洪志銘、羅時芳,碳稅與碳交易之比較與搭配,中華經濟研究院,2010。 [13] 李涵茵,能源服務產業研析,財團法人台灣綜合研究院,2007。 [17] 陳輝俊、王文伯、吳清圳,ESCO專案技術開發手冊,2009。 [23] 范建得、簡彗貞、石信智、吳奕霖,碳交易的概念及其應有之法律規制,永續產業發展雙月刊,第49期,18-35,2010。 [24] 王毅剛、葛興安、邵詩洋、李亞冬,碳排放交易制度的中國道路,北京:經濟管理出版社,2012。 [25] 黃宗煌,排放交易及相關問題研析,碳經濟,第8期,2-34,2008。 [27] 羅時芳,碳稅與碳交易:政策意涵及經濟分析,中華經濟研究院國際經濟所及能源與環境研究中心,2009。 [28] 台達電子文教基金會,誰有碳稅,誰有碳交易,國際低碳趨勢百科,2011。 [32] 梁啟源,能源稅、碳稅及碳權交易制之整合,中央研究院經濟研究所研究報告,2010。 [33] 環境保護署委託中華經濟研究院,我國徵收能源稅可行性分析,2008。 [34] 高雄市政府,高雄市事業氣候變遷調適費徵收自治條例草案,2012 [35] 雷琦珮、羅正忠,溫室氣體減量政策制定與碳稅實施效益-以高雄市為例,國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所在職專班碩士論文,2010。 [40] 蔡燕宗,實行碳稅與排放權交易之衝擊評估-以台灣電力部門為例,國立中興大學應用經濟學研究所碩士論文,2009。 [44] 黃若馨,加入環境效益考量之能源技術服務業合約模式探討,國立 台灣大學工業工程學研究所碩士論文,2014。 二、外文文獻 [3] F. W. H. Yik and W. L. Lee,“Partnership in building energy performance contracting,”Building Research & Information, vol. 32, pp. 235-243, 2004. [12] I. Brown,“European energy performance contracting,”Energy Policy, vol. 16, pp. 297-301, 1988. [14] Charles A. Goldman, Nicole C. Hopper, and Julie G. Osborn,“Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data,”Energy Policy, vol. 33, pp. 387–405, 2011. [15] P. Xu, E. H.-W. Chan, and Q. K. Qian,“Success factors of energy performance contracting (EPC) for sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit (BEER) of hotel buildings in China,”Energy Policy, vol. 39, pp. 7389-7398, 2011. [16] M. C. Baechler,“A Guide to Performance Contracting with ESCOs,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, 2011. [18] L. de Santoli, F. Fraticelli, F. Fornari, and C. Calice,“Energy performance assessment and a retrofit strategies in public school buildings in Rome,”Energy and Buildings, vol. 68, pp. 196-202, 2014. [19] P. H. Larsen, C. A. Goldman, and A. Satchwell,“Evolution of the U.S. energy service company industry: Market size and project performance from 1990–2008,”Energy Policy, vol. 50, pp. 802-820, 2012. [20] S. Andrew, A. G. Charles, H. L. Peter, G. Donald, and E. S. Terry,“A Survey of the U.S. ESCO Industry: Market Growth and Development from 2008 to 2011,”LBNL, Berkeley, 2010. [21] K. Gillingham, R. Newell, and K. Palmer,“Energy efficiency policies: A retrospective examination,”Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 31, pp. 161-192, 2006. [22] IEA,“CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2013, ”Paris, France: IEA, 2013. [26] K. S. Rogge, J. Schleich, and R. Betz,“An early assessment of national allocation plans for phase 2 of EU emission trading,”Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation No. S1/2006, 2006. [29] N. Suhonen and L. Okkonen,“The Energy Services Company (ESCO) as business model for heat entrepreneurship-A case study of North Karelia, Finland,”Energy Policy, vol. 61, pp. 783-787, 2013. [30] W. Fang and S. M. Miller,“The effect of ESCOs on carbon dioxide emissions,”Applied Economics, vol. 45, pp. 4796-4804, 2013. [31] J.N. Wang, G. Yan, K.J. Jiang, L.C. Liu, J.T. Yang, C.Z. Ge,“The study on China's carbon tax policy to mitigate climate change,”China Environmental Science, 2009 [37] P. S. P. Wong, S. T. T. Ng, and M. Shahidi,“Towards understanding the contractor's response to carbon reduction policies in the construction projects,”International Journal of Project Management, vol. 31, pp. 1042-1056, 2013. [38] K. Bumert,“Carbon Tax vs. Emissions Trading : What’s the Difference, and Which is Better?,”Global Policy Forum, 1998. [39] J. Maslow,“Carbon Tax or Carbon Trading?,”The Energy Independent, 2007. [43] Q. Deng, L. Zhang, Q. Cui, and X. Jiang,“A simulation-based decision model for designing contract period in building energy performance contracting,”Building and Environment, vol. 71, pp. 71-80, 2014. 三、網路資源 [2] 行政院環境保護署。Available: http://www.epa.gov.tw/ [4] 台灣能源技術服務產業發展協會。Available: http://www.taesco.org.tw/ [5] 中華民國能源技術服務商業同業公會。Available: http://www.esco.org.tw/ [7] 行政院環保署國家溫室氣體登錄平台。Available: http://ghgregistry.epa.gov.tw/ [36] 中華民國財政部。Available: http://www.mof.gov.tw/ [41] 經濟部能源局。Available: http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ [42] 台灣電力公司台東區營業處。Available: branch.taipower.com.tw/d111 [45] 台灣電力公司。Available: http://www.taipower.com.tw/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55022 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來,各國開始重視環保與氣候變遷等議題;同時,能源價格不斷上漲,對於包括我國在內天然能源匱乏的國家造成極大負擔,在綠色能源尚未能被廣泛運用的情況下,政府積極推動節能減碳政策。因應以上現況,「能源技術服務公司」 (Energy Service Company, ESCO) 衍生而出,它是提供能源用戶或政府單位改善能源使用效率的新型產業,主要係透過具有專業技術人員的能源技術公司與能源用戶或政府單位簽訂節能績效合約 (Energy Savings Performance Contract, ESPC),執行節能改善專案,將因節能所須付出之改善成本透過節能效益來補償。如何依據能源用戶現況,選擇合適的節能合約,是一項值得探討的課題。本研究依據節能效益分享型合約(Shared Savings Contract)與節能量保證型合約(Guaranteed Savings Contract)兩種常見的節能合約,特別探討政府強制課徵碳稅對能源技術服務公司、能源用戶及他們所簽訂節能合約的影響。因台灣離島的發電成本高於台灣本島,且規模不大,從離島著手進行節能改善示範應為初期可行方式;此外,配合政府近年所推動傳統水銀路燈汰換為LED路燈的計畫,本研究以某離島路燈節能為例,首先考慮建置成本、營運成本、維護費用、碳交易獲利、碳稅課徵成本、政府補助與否等多項因素,接著分析在前述節能效益分享型與節能量保證型合約下的投資報酬率,並分別探討有利於能源技術服務公司、能源用戶、甚至政府本身的各種不同節能合約情境。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Many countries start focusing on issues of environmental protection and climate change in recent years. In the meanwhile, the energy prices began to increase substantially which causes heavy burdens for countries including Taiwan who are lack of natural resources. Green energy thus becomes important. However, before the green energy can be used thoroughly, governments usually set up policies in advance for energy conservation and carbon deduction. In response to this situation, the energy service company (ESCO) has been developed for the purpose of improving energy waste for enterprises or governments. Projects are conducted according to energy savings performance contracts (ESPC) by which the future energy saving can be used to pay back the installation cost of energy efficiency systems through the technical support of ESCOs. How to choose a proper type of contract according to real circumstances of users is a critical issue. In the present research, analyses are carried out based on two commonly applied energy saving contracts named ‘shared savings contract’ and ‘guaranteed savings contract’. Carbon tax is taken into consideration in particular to investigate its influence on the contract. As the cost of power generation on off-shore islands is higher than that of Taiwan itself, and the scope of off-shore islands is also relative small. It would be reasonable to launch energy saving programs for initial experiments. Beside, in order to respond to the government’s project to replace traditional mercury-containing streetlights with LED streetlights, this thesis takes the replacing mercury-containing streetlights with LED streetlights on one of Taiwan’s off-shore island as an example. We first consider the cost and profit of construction, operation, maintenance of LED streetlights, and carbon trading, carbon tax, government’s grant-in-aid and other factors. Secondly, we analyze two kinds of performance contracts described above respectively to realize their payback periods and returns on investment. And then, we consider the perspective of ESCO, energy consumer, and government, respectively, to find out the appropriate energy saving business model and policies which benefit for each of themselves. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:44:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R00546020-1.pdf: 1731627 bytes, checksum: 63365fb8f9415414284e89ea6ba61d3e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機與目的 4 1.3 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 2.1 能源技術服務業 7 2.1.1 能源技術服務業定義 7 2.1.2 節能績效合約類型 8 2.1.3 節能改善專案執行流程 9 2.2 國內外能源技術服務產業概況 10 2.3 碳排放交易制度 13 2.4 溫室氣體減量之碳稅制度 15 2.4.1 國內外溫室氣體減量之碳稅制度 15 2.4.2 溫室氣體碳排交易與碳稅制度之比較 19 第三章、模型建立 21 3.1 節能商業模式指標定義 21 3.1.1 CO2電力排放係數 21 3.1.2 碳稅內部成本 22 3.1.3 投資報酬率 23 3.2 模型建立 24 3.2.1 改善前(某離島現狀) 24 3.2.2 專案實施期間 25 3.2.3 改善後 29 第四章、案例分析 30 4.1 節能效益分析 30 4.1.1經濟效益 30 4.1.2 建置與維護成本 31 4.1.3 碳排交易與碳稅成本 33 4.1.4 政府補助政策 34 4.2 情境分析 34 4.2.1 節能效益分享型合約 35 4.2.2 節能量保證型合約 39 4.3 小結 45 第五章、結論與建議 48 5.1 結論 48 5.2 未來研究與建議 49 參考文獻 51 一、中文文獻 51 二、外文文獻 52 三、網路資源 53 附錄一:第四章數種路燈汰換情境組合之收益分析 54 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 導入碳稅之能源技術服務業合約模式探討—以某離島置換LED路燈為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study of Contract Models in Energy Service Industry through Consideration of Carbon Tax---A Case Study of Employing LED Street Lights in an Isolated Island | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔣明晃,黃奎隆 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 能源技術服務業,節能績效合約模式,碳稅,碳(權)交易,LED路燈, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Energy Service Company (ESCO),Energy Saving Performance Contracts (ESPC),Carbon Tax,Carbon Trading,LED Streetlights, | en |
dc.relation.page | 62 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-02-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2300-01-01 | - |
Appears in Collections: | 工業工程學研究所 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.69 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.