請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55010完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陶儀芬(Yi-Feng Tao),連弘宜(Hong-Yi Lien) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chung-Lin Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳忠霖 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:44:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-03-13 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-02-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
壹、中文部分 一、專書 馬細譜，2010，《南斯拉夫興亡》，北京：中國社會科學文獻出版社 張穎，1998，《中東歐走向市場經濟》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。 黃志典，2009，《國際金融：理論、政策與應用》，台北：前程文化。 黃志典，2012，《貨幣銀行學概論》，修訂三版，台北：前程文化。 二、期刊論文 王義祥，1994，＜南斯拉夫經濟改革的歷史教訓＞，《俄羅斯研究》， （6）： 19-24。 沈志華，1999，＜論1948年蘇南衝突的結果—南斯拉夫是如何走上獨立道路的? ＞， 《世界歷史》，（5）：13-24。 陳新明，2008，＜南斯拉夫自治社會主義的失敗—關於集權和分權關係的思考＞， 《當代世界與社會主義》，（6）：151-154。 貳、外文部分 一、專書 Fisher, I. 1911. The Purchasing Power of Money, its Determination and Relation to Credit, Interest and Crises. New York: Macmillan. Friedman, M. and Schwartz, A. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States 1867–1960. New Jersey: Princeton University Press Gregory, R. and Stuart, C. 1985. Comparative Economic Systems, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Kolodko, G. and Gotz-Kozierkiewicz, D. 1992. Hyperinflation and Stabilization in Postsocialist Economies, London: Kluwer Academic Pub. Kolodko, G. 2000. Post-Communist Transition: The Thorny Road, Rochester: University of Rochester Press. Kolodko, Grzegorz. 2000. From Shock to Therapy: The Political Economy of Post socialist Transformation, New York: Oxford University Press. Kornai, Janos.1980. Economics of Shortage, Amsterdam: North Holland Press. Labus, M. and M. Dinkic. 2001. Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: Statement of Economic Policies, Belgrade: The Federal Government. Labus, M. and M. Dinkic. 2001. Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: Statement of Economic Policies, Belgrade: The Federal Government. Lampe, J. R., 2000. Yugoslavia as History: Twice There was a Country, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, second edition. North, Douglass. 1990. Institution, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, Peters, B. G. 2005. Institutional theory in Political Science: the New Institutionalism, London: Continuum. Roland, G. 2000. Transition and Economics: Politics, markets, and Firms, Cambridge: The MIT Pres. Thomas, R. 1999. Serbia under Milosevic: Politics in the 1990s, London: Hurst & Company. Uvalic, Milica.1992, Investment and Property Rights in Yugoslavia: The long transition to a market economy, In Soviet and East European Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 二、期刊論文 Avramovic, D. 1995a. “Reconstruction of the Monetary System and Economic Recovery of Yugoslavia, 1994: Analytic Framework, Results and Problems”, Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies (216)： 22. Avramovic, D. and Uvalic, M. 1996. ““The Democratization of Property Rights on the line of Privatization “, In Ekonomika, 32(6)：313–318. De Melo, M., Denizer C., and Gelb A. 1996. “Patterns of Transition from Plan to Market”, In The World Bank Economic Review, 10(3): 397-424. Dhanji, F. and Milanovic, B. (1991), “Privatization in Eastern and Central Europe. Objectives, Constraints, and Models of Divesture”, In World Bank Policy Research,(1)1,Working Papers, WPS 770. EBRD, 2009, EBRD Transition Report: Serbia, London: EBRD. EBRD, 2012, EBRD Transition Report: Serbia, London: EBRD. Economist Intelligence Unit. 1995. Country Report – Yugoslavia (Serbia – Montenegro), 1st quarter 1995, London: EIU. Economist Intelligence Unit. 2000. Country Report – Yugoslavia (Serbia – Montenegro), London: EIU. Economist Intelligence Unit. 2002. Country Report – Yugoslavia (Serbia – Montenegro), London: EIU. Economist Intelligence Unit. 2009. Country Report –Serbia London: EIU. EU Commission, 2013, “Serbia EU Bilater Trade and Trade with the World”, Bruxelle: EU Commission. EU Commission, 2013,”EU and Serbia: enhanced cooperation rules enter into force”. Brussels: EU. G17 . 1999. “Final Account – Economic Consequences of NATO Bombing – Estimate of the Damage and Finances Required for the Economic Reconstruction of Yugoslavia”, ed. Dinkic, M., Belgrade: G17. G 17 Plus. 2000a, “the White book of Milosevic”s Rule”, Belgrade: G 17 Plus. G 17 Plus. 2000b, “the program of the Democratic Opposition of Serbia: The Democratic Serbia”, Belgrade: G 17 Plus. Hall, A., and Taylor, R. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, In Political Studies, 44 (5), 936-957. Huba Martin, 2009, Retrospective evaluation of CARDS programmes in Serbia Final Evaluation Report, Germany: Particip GmbH. IMF, 2000, World Economic Outlook: Focus on Transition Economies. Washington: IMF IMF, 2010, “Republic of Serbia: Financial Sector Assessment Program Update—Technical Note on Banking Sector Soundness and Stress Testing”. Washington D.C : International Monetary Fund IMF, January 2010,”Republic of Serbia－Second Review under Stand-By Arrangement and Requests for Wavier of End-September Performance Criterion, Modification of End-September Performance Criterion, Rephrasing of Purchases, and Financing Assurances Review”, Washington D.C.: IMF Publication. Jovičić, M. 2005. “Privatization Effects on Labour Marker in Serbia: Bottlenecks of the Transition Process,” In Economic Annals, 50：55-77. Kornai, Janos. 1999. Hardening the Budget Constraint: The Experience of Post-Socialist Countries. Budapest: Collegium Budapest Kornai, Janos. 1994. Transformational Recession: The Main Causes, In Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 19, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Kornai, Janos. 2000c. “Ten Years after “The Road to a Free Economy”: The Author”s Self-Evaluation “In Economic Systems 24(4) March, J. G., & Olsen, J. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, (78), 734-749 Schoenfeld, Roladn, 1995,”The rold of Internaitonal Financial Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe” In Journal of Comparative Economics, 20(1), 49-56. Shepsle, K. A.1989. “Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice”, In Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1(2), 131-147 Stern, N. and Lankes, H. P.. 1998. “Making the most of markets: the role of IFIs EIB papers“, 3 (2), 102-115. Svilanovic, G. 2001. “Results of International Activity of the FR of Yugoslavia, October 2000 – September 2001”, Yugoslav Survey ,(3), 3–24. Thelen, K.1999. Historical Institutionalism In Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. California: Annual Review, (2), 369-404. Uvalic, M. 1993. “The Disintegration of Yugoslavia: Its Costs and Benefits”, In Communist Economies & Economic Transformation, 5( 3), 273-293. Weder B., 2000, “Institutional Reform in Transition Economies: How Far Have They Come?” In IMF Working Paper, 1( 114), 26. 三、專書論文 Antonić, Slobodan. 1995. “The Place and Role of Parliament”, In Challenges of Parliamentarism – The Case of Serbia in the Early Nineties, ed. V. Goati, Belgrade: Institute of Social Sciences, 27-43. Barisitz, Stephan. 2004, “Exchange rate arrangements and monetary policy in Southeastern Europe and Turkey: some stylized facts “, In the Focus on European Economic Integration, ed. Doris Ritzberger-Gruenwald, Vienna: Ostereiche Nationale Bank, 95-118. Cerovic, B. and Nojkovic, A. 2008. “The Slowing Down of Reforms in Serbia: The. Cost of Missed Opportunities”, In Where Serbia Goes – the Realization and Scope of Reforms, ed. Zec, M. and Cerovic B., Belgrade: Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, 23–42. Labus, M. 2003b. “Transition in FR Yugoslavia a Year after Radical Political Changes”, in Post-Communist Transition to a Market Economy: Lessons and Challenges, eds. D. M. Nuti and M. Uvalic, Ravenna: Longo Editore, 285–300. Michal K. & Slacik T., 2006. “Serbia: Country Profile and Recent Economic Developments”, In Focus on European Economic Integration, eds. Doris Ritzberger-Gruenwald, 109 -133 Bailey D. and De Propris L. 2004. “A Bridge to Phare? EU Pre-Accession Aid and Capacity-Building in the Candidate Countries”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 77–98 Mencinger, J. 2003. “Does Foreign Direct Investment Always Enhance Economic Growth?” In Kyklos, 56 (4), 493–510. Minic, J. and M. Dereta. 2007“An Exit to Democracy in Serbia”, In Reclaiming Democracy: Civil Society and Electoral Change in Central and Eastern Europe, eds. J. Forbrig and Demes, 79–96. Pavlakovic, V. 2005. “Serbia Transformed? Political Dynamics in the Milosevic Era and After”, In Serbia since 1989: Politics and Society under Milosevic and After, eds. P. S. Ramet and V. Pavlakovic, Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. Petrovic, P. 1996. “Sustainability of Economic Stabilization in FR Yugoslavia and Importance of Resumption of Foreign Trade”, In The Cost of War in Former Yugoslavia, eds. M. Crnobrnja and Z. Papic, Paris and Beograd, 369-404. Popovic, D. 1997. “Yugoslavia”s Prospects for Sustained Growth: Controversies and Constraints”, in EU Enlargement: Yugoslavia and the Balkans, ed. J. Minic, Belgrade: European Movement in Serbia, 161–8. Tamas Szemler., 2008, “EU Financial Support for the Western-Balkans: Well-Suited to Real Needs, In Using IPA And Other EU Funds to Accelerate Convergence and Integration in The Western-Balkans ed. Ed.Balaz Pete, Central European Budapest ： University-ENS, , 9-23. Travaglino, R., 2009,”The Balkans: moving towards European Union or towards a renewed instability?” In L”Europa e la Russia avent”anni dall”89, eds. R. Gualtieri e J. L.Rhi-Sausi, Bologna: Il Mulino, 151–75. 四、研討會論文 Arandarenko, Mihail. 2009b,”Social interests and the global crisis”, presentation at the conference “20 Years towards the Market Economy”at Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 28–29 September, Belgrade. 四、博士論文 Olsen, R. 1983. Interaction between Law and Society: An Interpretation of Law in Action and the Function of Property Rights. Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich 五、網路資訊 Besley, T., Dewatripont, M. and Guriev, S. 2010. “Transition and Transition Impact. A Review of the Concept and Implications for EBRD. Report for the EBRD”s Office of the Chief Economist.”in http://www.ebrd.com/pages/research/publications/special/besley.shtml. Last updated 16 August 2013. Mate Gjorgjievski. 2008. “EU Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance: the Path to a Successful Start”, in Using IPA and Other EU Funds to Accelerate Convergence and Integration in The Western-Balkans, Central European University-ENS, Budapest, in http://web.ceu.hu/cens/assets/files/IPA.pdf 69-89. Last updated 20 August 2013 Vejvoda, I. 2006. “Serbia: Current Issues and Future Direction”, Testimony to the US Congress House of Representatives, in http://www.gmfus.org/archives/ivan-vejvoda-congressiona-testimony-the-western-balka ns-and-the-2012-nato-summit/. Last updated 20 September 2013 Vujačić, I. V. 2011. “Privatization in Serbia- Results and Institutional Failures, in http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0013-3264/2011/0013-32641191089V.pdf. Last updated 20 October 2013 World Bank, 2012, World Bank Indicator, in http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Last updated 20 January 2014. World Bank, 2013,” Serbia - Bor Regional Development Project: P092999, in http://www.worldbank.org/projects/P092999/yf-bor-reg-devt-proj?lang=en Last updated 6 January 2014. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55010 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 當東歐國家採震盪療法經濟轉型，南斯拉夫聯邦共和國下的塞爾維亞卻遲至2000年才開始。90年代來不論是採取震盪療法或是漸進主義 後共國家都欲遠離社會主義轉向市場經濟體制。在這股經濟轉型潮流中的「後進者」塞爾維亞 在2000年10月後進入後米羅塞維奇(post-Milosevic)時代並於2012年3月取得歐盟候選國資格 。這個90年代飽受戰亂、國際制裁而停滯的經濟改革社會主義國家在2012年竟取得歐盟候選國資格，究竟從經濟改革停滯到取得歐盟候選國資格間，經濟轉型的進程為何?又影響其進程的內外因素有哪些?本文首論研究動機與目的並回顧相關文獻，再論經濟轉型背景內涵包括米羅塞維奇時代與2000年以降五任政府的政經背景如何造成市場經濟制度抉擇；再次，論述後米羅塞維奇時代的經濟型轉型進程包括私有化、自由化與穩定化；最後整理出影響轉型內外因素包括內戰、憲政制度、(塞-蒙關係)、民族主義、政府鬥爭行政效能低、裙帶關係; 外在因素包括國際金融組織、EU、科索沃問題、前南斯拉夫國際刑事法庭合作與08金融海嘯。最終以EBRD轉型指標做結。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The collapse of Soviet Union marks not only the victory of capitalism, but also ushered in the economic transition in several post-communist countries. While, the Republic of Serbia, then in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia(1992-2003), did not jump on that bandwagon. Not until the collapse of Milosevic regime in October 2000 can Serbia kick off economic transition. In 1990's Serbia was ravaged by wars and sanctions were also put in place. Serbia has recovered its foot, moving toward market economy during the past decade. In March 2012, she was identified as a potential candidate for EU membership. The article will focus on the following issues: footprint of Serbia's economic transition, economic transition's political and economic background in 5 governments after 2000, its external and internal factors, and also evaluation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:44:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01322056-1.pdf: 7299188 bytes, checksum: 6e95d524286a2ad70de3f62691f16dfb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究途徑與方法 2 第三節 研究範圍與限制 6 第四節 章節安排 7 第五節 經濟轉型理論回顧 7 第六節 文獻回顧 9 第二章 經濟轉型模式理論與實際操作 19 第一節 經濟轉型理論與定義 19 第二節 震盪療法的模式 24 第三節 震盪療法之實際操作 35 第四節 小結 42 第三章 後米氏時代塞國經濟轉型背景 44 第一節 社會主義自治時期的塞國 44 第二節 南斯拉夫聯盟共和國 50 第三節 推土機革命到塞國第一政府 58 第四節 塞國第二政府至第五政府 66 第五節 小結 74 第四章 塞國經濟轉型進程 77 第一節 經濟轉型具體措施 77 第二節 國際組織(IMF/EU)的角色 89 第三節 評估經濟轉型 98 第四節 小結 109 第五章 結論 113 參考文獻 127 圖表目次 圖 一 1 本文研究途徑 5 圖 一 2 國家對產權掌控有無與經濟體制 8 圖 二 1 國家對產權的控制程度與經濟制度 20 圖 二 2 經濟制度轉型途徑 24 圖 二 3 震盪療法自由化與惡性通膨關係圖 30 圖 二 4 後共國家轉型初期通膨變化 40 圖 四 1 塞爾維亞通膨(2000-2012) 78 圖 四 2 塞國經常帳(2000-2013) 80 圖 四 3 2000-2013年塞國公共支出占GDP比 82 圖 四 4 2000-2013年塞國財政赤字占GDP比 82 圖 四 5 2000-2012 塞國總FDI流量 83 圖 四 6 2007-2012塞國重要經濟指標 83 圖 四 7 2003-2004年塞國私有化(招標與拍賣)總數季變化 88 圖 五 1 塞爾維亞經濟轉型過程圖 114 圖 五 2 2000年10月塞國經濟轉型順序 117 表 二 1 後共國家轉型初期通貨膨脹 36 表 三 1 1989至2000年市場經濟轉型評估 55 表 三 2 1995-2000年南聯盟總體經濟指標 57 表 三 3 1995-2000年南聯盟貿易指標 58 表 三 4 Djindjic與Kostunica之比較 63 表 三 5 塞爾維亞各政黨意識形態 70 表 三 6 塞爾維亞2000年後政黨態樣及對經濟轉型之態度彙整表 74 表 四 1 歐盟西巴爾幹政策工具：援助對象、金額與內容 93 表 四 2 近年來IMF與塞國重要貸款協議 95 表 四 3 2007-2013年IPA援助塞國資金 97 表 四 4 2000-2007年 EBRD塞國經濟轉型表現 101 表 四 5 2008-2012年 EBRD塞國經濟轉型各項表現 102 表 四 6 塞國2002-2011年私有化成果一覽表 103 表 四 7 2001年-2009年對歐盟逆差占塞國貿易逆差 106 表 四 8 2010年-2012年對歐盟逆差占塞國貿易逆差 107 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 震盪療法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經濟轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 塞爾維亞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 市場經濟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Serbia | en |
| dc.subject | Economic Transition | en |
| dc.subject | Market Economy | en |
| dc.subject | Shock Therapy | en |
| dc.title | 後米羅塞維奇時代塞爾維亞的經濟轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Economic Transition in Post-Milosevic Serbia | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 經濟轉型,塞爾維亞,震盪療法,市場經濟, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Economic Transition,Serbia,Shock Therapy,Market Economy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 128 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-02-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 7.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。