請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54925
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李佳霖(Chia-Lin Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Ho Lai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 賴佳禾 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:41:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-02-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106(4), 748-765. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.106.4.748
Ariel, M. (2008). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24(01), 65. doi: 10.1017/s0022226700011567 Burke, D. M., & Mackay, D. G. (1997). Memory, language, and ageing. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 352(1363), 1845-1856. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0170 Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of memory and language, 30(5), 542-579. doi: 10.1016/0749-596x(91)90026-g Burke, D. M., & Peters, L. (1986). Word associations in old age: Evidence for consistency in semantic encoding during adulthood. Psychology and aging, 1(4), 283-291. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.1.4.283 Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2004). Aging and Language Production. Current directions in psychological science, 13(1), 21-24. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301006.x Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2008). Language and Aging. In F. I. M. C. T. A. Salthouse (Ed.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.) (pp. 373-443). New York: Psychology Press. Burke, D. M., White, H., & Diaz, D. L. (1987). Semantic priming in young and older adults: Evidence for age constancy in automatic and attentional processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 79-88. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.79 Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model. Psychology and aging, 17(1), 85-100. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.17.1.85 Caplan, D., Dede, G., Waters, G., Michaud, J., & Tripodis, Y. (2011). Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses. Psychology and aging, 26(2), 439-450. doi: 10.1037/a0021837 Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 601-609. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80022-4 Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Cinnaminson, [N.J.]: Foris Publications. Clark, H. H., & Sengul, C. J. (1979). In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Memory & cognition, 7(1), 35-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03196932 Connelly, S. L., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Age and reading: the impact of distraction. Psychology and aging, 6(4), 533-541. Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(1), 21-58. doi: 10.1080/016909698386582 Crawley, R. A., Stevenson, R. J., & Kleinman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 19(4), 245-264. doi: 10.1007/bf01077259 Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42(2), 133-141. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00274.x Federmeier, K. D., Van Petten, C., Schwartz, T. J., & Kutas, M. (2003). Sounds, words, sentences: age-related changes across levels of language processing. Psychology and aging, 18(4), 858-872. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.858 Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of outpatients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Hove [England] : Philadelphia: Hove England : Psychology Press. Garvey, C., Caramazza, A., & Yates, J. (1974). Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3(3), 227-243. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(74)90010-9 Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32(2), 99-156. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90001-2 Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency. Journal of memory and language, 28(6), 735-755. doi: 10.1016/0749-596x(89)90006-5 Goh, J. O. (2011). Functional Dedifferentiation and Altered Connectivity in Older Adults: Neural Accounts of Cognitive Aging. Aging and disease, 2(1), 30-48. Gordon, P. C., & Hendrick, R. (1998). The Representation and Processing of Coreference in Discourse. Cognitive science, 22(4), 389-424. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2204_1 Grady, C. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 13(7), 491-505. doi: 10.1038/nrn3256 Greene, S. B., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 266-283. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.266 Hammer, A., Jansma, B. M., Lamers, M., & Munte, T. F. (2005). Pronominal reference in sentences about persons or things: an electrophysiological approach. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 17(2), 227-239. doi: 10.1162/0898929053124947 Hammer, A., Jansma, B. M., Lamers, M., & Munte, T. F. (2008). Interplay of meaning, syntax and working memory during pronoun resolution investigated by ERPs. Brain Res, 1230, 177-191. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.004 Hirst, W., & Brill, G. A. (1980). Contextual aspects of pronoun assignment. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(2), 168-175. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90152-8 James, L. E., & Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1378-1391. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1378 Jarvikivi, J., van Gompel, R. P., Hyona, J., & Bertram, R. (2005). Ambiguous pronoun resolution: contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts. Psychol Sci, 16(4), 260-264. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01525.x Johnson, R. (2003). Aging and the remembering of text. Developmental Review, 23(3), 261-346. doi: 10.1016/s0273-2297(03)00009-1 Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 Kahn, H. J., & Till, R. E. (1991). Pronoun reference and aging. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7(4), 459-475. doi: 10.1080/87565649109540505 Kemmer, L., Coulson, S., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2004). Syntactic processing with aging: an event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 41(3), 372-384. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.2004.00180.x Kemtes, K. A., & Kemper, S. (1997). Younger and older adults' on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Psychology and aging, 12(2), 362-371. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.12.2.362 Kennison, S. M. (2003). Comprehending pronouns: a role for word-specific gender stereotype information. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 32(3), 355-378. doi: 10.1023/a:1023599719948 Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. Brain Res, 1146, 23-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063 Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Differential age effects on lexical ambiguity resolution mechanisms. Psychophysiology, 48(7), 960-972. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01158.x Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). Ambiguity's aftermath: how age differences in resolving lexical ambiguity affect subsequent comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 50(5), 869-879. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.027 Leonard, C. L., Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1997). The influence of contextual information on the resolution of ambiguous pronouns by younger and older adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(03), 293-317. doi: 10.1017/s0142716400010493 Li, X., & Zhou, X. (2010). Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension. Brain Res, 1331, 96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.050 Light, L. L., & Capps, J. L. (1986). Comprehension of pronouns in young and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 580-585. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.580 Light, L. L., Capps, J. L., Singh, A., & Albertson Owens, S. A. (1994). Comprehension and use of anaphoric devices in young and older adults. Discourse Processes, 18(1), 77-103. doi: 10.1080/01638539409544885 Little, D. M., Prentice, K. J., & Wingfield, A. (2004). Adult age differences in judgments of semantic fit. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(01). doi: 10.1017/s0142716404001079 Meunier, D., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Age-related functional reorganization, structural changes, and preserved cognition. Neurobiology of aging, 35(1), 42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.003 Meyer, A. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Event-related potentials reveal the effects of aging on meaning selection and revision. Psychophysiology, 47(4), 673-686. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00983.x Molinaro, N., Kim, A., Vespignani, F., & Job, R. (2008). Anaphoric agreement violation: an ERP analysis of its interpretation. Cognition, 106(2), 963-974. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.006 Morrow, D., Altieri, P., & Leirer, V. (1992). Aging, narrative organization, presentation mode, and referent choice strategies. Experimental aging research, 18(1-2), 75-84. doi: 10.1080/03610739208253914 Nieuwland, M. S. (2014). “Who’s he?” Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns. Journal of memory and language, 76, 1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.002 Nieuwland, M. S., Otten, M., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2007a). Who are you talking about? Tracking discourse-level referential processing with event-related brain potentials. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 19(2), 228-236. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.228 Nieuwland, M. S., Petersson, K. M., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2007b). On sense and reference: examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing. NeuroImage, 37(3), 993-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.048 Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2006). Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs. Brain Res, 1118(1), 155-167. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.022 Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McLaughlin, J. (1997). Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory & cognition, 25(3), 273-285. doi: 10.3758/bf03211283 Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree. Journal of memory and language, 34(6), 739-773. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1033 Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and aging, 17(2), 299-320. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.17.2.299 Qiu, L., Swaab, T. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wang, S. (2012). The role of gender information in pronoun resolution: evidence from Chinese. PloS one, 7(5), e36156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036156 Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2000). Functionality and spatial relations in memory and language. Memory & cognition, 28(6), 987-992. doi: 10.3758/bf03209346 Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2001). Working memory and situation model updating. Memory & cognition, 29(8), 1073-1080. doi: 10.3758/bf03206375 Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2004). Working Memory Span and Situation Model Processing. The American Journal of Psychology, 117(2), 191. doi: 10.2307/4149022 Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Brief report: Aging and functional spatial relations in comprehension and memory. Psychology and aging, 18(1), 161-165. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.161 Radvansky, G. A., & Dijkstra, K. (2007). Aging and situation model processing. Psychon Bull Rev, 14(6), 1027-1042. doi: 10.3758/BF03193088 Radvansky, G. A., Lynchard, N. A., & von Hippel, W. (2009). Aging and stereotype suppression. Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition, 16(1), 22-32. doi: 10.1080/13825580802187200 Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Cappell, K. A. (2008). Neurocognitive Aging and the Compensation Hypothesis. Current directions in psychological science, 17(3), 177-182. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403-428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Selective review of cognitive aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 16(5), 754-760. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000706 Schmitt, B. M., Lamers, M., & Munte, T. F. (2002). Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(3), 333-346. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00136-2 Scialfa, C. T. (2002). The role of sensory factors in cognitive aging research. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale, 56(3), 153-163. doi: 10.1037/h0087393 Shake, M. C., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2011). Age differences in resolving anaphoric expressions during reading. Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition, 18(6), 678-707. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.607228 Singer, T., Verhaeghen, P., Ghisletta, P., Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2003). The fate of cognition in very old age: Six-year longitudinal findings in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE). Psychology and aging, 18(2), 318-331. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.318 Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and aging, 14(3), 458-472. Stine-Morrow, E. A., Ryan, S., & Leonard, J. S. (2000). Age differences in on-line syntactic processing. Experimental aging research, 26(4), 315-322. doi: 10.1080/036107300750015714 Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L. M. S., & Nevin, J. A. (1999). The Effects of Context and Feedback on Age Differences in Spoken Word Recognition. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54B(2), P125-P134. doi: 10.1093/geronb/54B.2.P125 Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(02), 277-293. doi: 10.1017/s1366728913000370 Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.002 Thornton, R., & Light, L. L. (2006). Language Comprehension and Production in Normal Aging. In J. E. S. Birren, K. Warner (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6 ed., pp. 261-287). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. Tyler, L. K., Shafto, M. A., Randall, B., Wright, P., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2010). Preserving syntactic processing across the adult life span: the modulation of the frontotemporal language system in the context of age-related atrophy. Cerebral cortex, 20(2), 352-364. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp105 Van Berkum, J. J., Koornneef, A. W., Otten, M., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2007). Establishing reference in language comprehension: an electrophysiological perspective. Brain Res, 1146, 158-171. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.091 van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early Referential Context Effects in Sentence Processing: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials. Journal of memory and language, 41(2), 147-182. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2641 Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40(2), 235-248. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00025 Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2001). Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and aging, 16(1), 128-144. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.16.1.128 White, K. K., & Abrams, L. (2004). Phonologically mediated priming of preexisting and new associations in young and older adults. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 30(3), 645-655. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.645 Wlotko, E. W., Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Language of the aging brain: Event-related potential studies of comprehension in older adults. Lang Linguist Compass, 4(8), 623-638. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00224.x Xu, X., Jiang, X., & Zhou, X. (2013). Processing biological gender and number information during Chinese pronoun resolution: ERP evidence for functional differentiation. Brain Cogn, 81(2), 223-236. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.11.002 Zelinski, E. M., & Miura, S. A. (1990). Anaphor Comprehension in Younger and Older Adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31(2), 111-134. doi: 10.2190/a2dn-d7ff-gq7x-nauf Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological bulletin, 123(2), 162-185. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.123.2.162 陳貽照. (1998). 影響中文多義詞在句中辨識程的因素:工作記憶容量或多義詞在語言中的比率. (碩士), 國立台灣大學, 台北市. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54925 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討老化對於中文代名詞理解之影響。代名詞的理解過程涉及代名詞本身與指涉對象之間的關係連結是否能成功建立,但若在文本情境中出現太多或太少可能的指涉對象,都會造成指涉關係理解上的困難。而近來的研究顯示,在面對複雜語句結構或歧義字詞等較耗費認知資源的情況時,語言理解能力的確會受到老化的影響而顯現差異。因此,本研究欲利用事件相關電位(Event-Related Potentials, ERP)技術來探討老化對理解代名詞指涉關係所造成之影響及相關神經電生理機制變化。
本研究操弄代名詞其在句中指涉對象的多寡而形成三種指涉情況:代名詞有兩個可能的指涉對象(指涉關係模糊)、代名詞僅有一個可能的指涉對象(指涉關係明確)、代名詞沒有任何可能的指涉對象(指涉關係失靈),並記錄年輕人及老年人在理解上述指涉關係時所產生的腦電位變化。 研究結果顯示,年輕組與過去文獻相符,相較於指涉關係明確的代名詞,在處理指涉關係模糊的代名詞時會引發sustained frontal negativity (Nref),而在處理指涉關係失靈的代名詞時則會引發P600的腦電位變化,且後者存在個體差異,約有三分之一的年輕受試者對指涉關係失靈的代名詞引發負向腦電位變化。另一方面,老年組的資料顯示,相較於指涉關係明確的代名詞,在處理指涉關係模糊的代名詞時並沒有引發sustained frontal negativity (Nref),卻出現中後區的負向腦電位變化;而在處理指涉關係失靈的代名詞時並沒有顯現任何的腦電位變化,但個別資料顯示,約有一半的老年受試者對指涉關係失靈的代名詞引發正向腦電位變化,另一半則引發負向腦電位變化,因而造成整體腦電位效果的相互抵消。 綜合上述,本研究結果說明,老年人仍有能力處理指涉關係模糊的代名詞,但會有不同於年輕人的神經電生理變化發生,此現象可能來自於伴隨老化的腦部結構及神經機制運用上的轉變;而對於處理指涉關係失靈的代名詞,年輕人及老年人都存有理解上的個體差異,可以不同的方式來解決指涉關係失靈的代名詞,如歸咎於語法或語義上的整合缺失、抑或試圖成立新的指涉對象,因而會造成相對應的腦電位變化差異。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The present study aims to investigate the age effects on comprehension of Chinese pronoun and corresponding electrophysiological changes. Pronoun comprehension involves the establishment of referential relationships between pronouns and antecedents. Sometimes the assignment of a pronoun is difficult since there might be more than one possible antecedents or no possible corresponding antecedent in the context. And recent studies showed that language processes that require more top-down resources, such as processing sentences with complex structure or selecting appropriate meanings for ambiguous words in a context, could be compromised with advancing age. In order to investigate age effects on referential processing, the present study used Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to examine age differences in Mandarin Chinese pronoun comprehension.
We manipulated the referential relations between pronouns and the number of possible antecedents in the sentences such that each pronoun has either (1) two antecedents (referentially ambiguous), (2) one antecedent (referentially unambiguous), or (3) zero antecedent (referential failure). And we recorded younger and older adults’ brain potentials while they were reading sentences in these situations. Our results showed that, consistent with the Dutch findings, relative to unambiguous pronouns, younger adults showed a sustained frontal negativity (Nref) to ambiguous pronouns and a central-posterior P600 effect to referentially failing pronouns. However, there are individual differences in processing referential failure, while the majority of the younger adults showed the P600 effects to referentially failing pronouns, some younger adults showed negativities instead. Older adults did not show the sustained frontal negativity effect to ambiguous pronouns, but a central-posterior negativity instead. On the other hand, older adults as a group showed little P600 effect to referentially failing pronouns but this was due to the cancellation of negative and positive effects we found in individual data. Therefore, our present findings suggest that, older adults are still able to do the resolution of referential ambiguity but with different brain potential patterns compared to younger adults. This may due to the changes on brain morphology or recruitment of neural resources with advancing age. Also, individual differences of processing of referential failure existed in both younger and older adults. People could use different processing strategies to comprehend referentially failing pronouns, such as attributing them to syntactic integration difficulties, semantic integration difficulties, or inventing a new possible referent. These different referential interpretations may mediate the electrophysiological effects in resolution of referential failure situations. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:41:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01454013-1.pdf: 4549265 bytes, checksum: c3699c5d0bb4704aa7f089b79d22f6f1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chinese Abstract i
English Abstract iii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Literature review 1 1.1.1 Aging and language comprehension 1 1.1.2 Anaphoric comprehension 8 1.1.2.1 Referential ambiguity 11 1.1.2.2 Referential failure 14 1.1.3 Aging and anaphoric processing 18 1.2 Current study and research questions 21 2. Methods 23 2.1 Participants 23 2.2 Materials 23 2.3 Procedure 27 2.4 EEG recording and data analysis 31 3. Results 33 3.1 Behavior 33 3.2 ERP 34 3.2.1 Effects of referential ambiguity 34 3.2.2 Effects of referential failure 37 3.2.2.1 Individual difference analysis 40 3.2.3 Summary 48 4. Discussion 49 4.1 Age differences in resolution of referential ambiguity 50 4.2 Age differences in resolution of referential failure 52 4.3 Individual differences in referential processing 53 References 58 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 老化及個體差異對於中文代名詞理解之影響:事件相關電位研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Aging and individual differences in Chinese pronoun comprehension: an ERP study | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李佳穎(Chia-Ying Lee),吳恩賜(Oon-Soo Goh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 老化,個體差異,代名詞,指涉關係模糊(referential ambiguity),指涉關係失靈(referential failure),事件相關電位, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | aging,individual differences,pronoun,referential ambiguity,referential failure,event-related potentials, | en |
dc.relation.page | 68 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-02-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 腦與心智科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 腦與心智科學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.44 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。