請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54736完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳淑惠 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Lin Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳瑋琳 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:37:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-08-11 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-04-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 呂岳霖（2005）。國立台中師範學院學生生活壓力與因應策略之研究（未出版之
碩士論文）。國立台中師範學院國民教育學研究所，台中。 李金治、陳政友（2004）。國立臺灣師範大學四年級學生生活壓力、因應方式、 社會支持與其身心健康之相關研究。學校衛生（44），1-31。 林杏真（2002）。自傷青少年生活壓力、社會支持與自我強度的發展及其關係研 究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系，台北。 翁素月、陸汝斌、陳碧霞、吳玫勳、賴姿如、周桂如（2005）。憂鬱症患者非理 性信念、生活壓力及其憂鬱程度之關係探討。新臺北護理期刊， 7（2）， 13-22。 翁嘉英（2012）。轉角找回好心情：清心減壓最能實做的8堂課。臺北市：天下 雜誌社。 陳弘儒（2015）。台灣青少年憂鬱的性別特定模式之前瞻性研究：憂鬱與壓力、 自我掌控信念、反芻風格之關聯（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣大學心 理學研究所，台北。 陳柏齡（2000）。國中生生活壓力、失敗容忍力與憂鬱傾向之關係研究（未出版 之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，高雄。 陳筱瑄（2002）。台中縣某國中學生內外控人格特質、主觀生活壓力、因應行為 與自覺身心健康之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學健 康促進與衛生教育學系，台北。 楊如泰（2010）。整合憂鬱人際與認知模式：苦惱自責式反芻及因果不確定感於 過度尋求再保證與憂鬱間之多重中介效果（未出版之碩士論文）。臺灣大 學心理學研究所，台北。 劉玉華（2004）。以全人教育觀來看大學生壓力源及壓力因應之模式。實踐通識 論叢， 2，65-82。 盧孟良、車先蕙、張尚文、沈武典（2002）。 中文版貝克憂鬱量表第二版之信 度和效度。「台灣精神醫學」， 16（4），301-310。 蘇素美（2013）。「歸因型態量表」之編製及其信、效度研究。教育研究學報， 47（2），21-45。 Abela, J. R. Z., Brozina, K., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). A test of integration of the activation hypothesis and the diathesis-stress component of the hopelessness theory of depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(2), 111-128. doi: 10.1348/014466504323088006 49 Abela, J. R. Z., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2000). The hopelessness theory of depression: A test of the diathesis-stress component in the interpersonal and achievement domains. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(4), 361-378. doi: 10.1023/A:1005571518032 Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96(2), 358-372. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49-74. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, London: Sage. Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Hartlage, S. (1988). The hopelessness theory of depression: Attributional aspects. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(1), 5-21. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00749.x Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Whitehouse, W. G., Hogan, M. E., Tashman, N. A., Steinberg, D. L., . . . Donovan, P. (1999). Depressogenic cognitive styles: Predictive validity, information processing and personality characteristics, and developmental origins. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(6), 503-531. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967%2898%2900157-0 Alloy, L. B., & Clements, C. M. (1998). Hopelessness theory of depression: Tests of the symptom component. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(4), 303-335. doi: 10.1023/A:1018753028007 Andreotti, C., Thigpen, J. E., Dunn, M. J., Watson, K., Potts, J., Reising, M. M., . . . Compas, B. E. (2013). Cognitive reappraisal and secondary control coping: Associations with working memory, positive and negative affect, and symptoms of anxiety/depression. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 26(1), 20-35. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2011.631526 Barlow, D. H., & Durand, V. M. (2009). Abnormal psychology : an integrative approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Bebbington, P., Der, G., MacCarthy, B., Wykes, T., Brugha, T., Sturt, P., & Potter, J. (1993). Stress incubation and the onset of affective disorders. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 358-362. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.3.358 Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory Manual (2 ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Brougham, R. R., Zail, C. M., Mendoza, C. M., & Miller, J. R. (2009). Stress, Sex Differences, and Coping Strategies Among College Students. [Article]. Current Psychology, 28(2), 85-97. doi: 10.1007/s12144-009-9047-0 Butters, J., McClure, J., Siegert, R., & Ward, T. (1997). Attributions for real and 50 hypothetical events: Do they predict depression? Australian Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 42-48. doi: 10.1080/00049539708259849 Chang, E. C. (2000). Causal uncertainty and depressive symptoms: Appraisals and coping as mediating variables. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(3), 420-436. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2000.19.3.420 Conway, M., Giannopoulos, C., Csank, P., & Mendelson, M. (1993). Dysphoria and specificity in self-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(3), 265-268. doi: 10.1177/0146167293193002 Dyson, R., & Renk, K. (2006). Freshmen Adaptation to University Life: Depressive Symptoms, Stress, and Coping. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(10), 1231-1244. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20295 Flett, G. L., Blankstfin, K. R., & Kleinfeldt, S. (1991). DEPRESSION AND CASUAL ATTRIBUTIONS FOR UNEXPECTED STRESSFUL EVENTS. [Article]. Social Behavior & Personality: an international journal, 19(1), 53-64. Flett, G. L., Pliner, P., & Blankstein, K. R. (1989). Depression and components of attributional complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 757-764. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.757 Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Abramowitz, A., & Bertram, T. L. (2006). The effect of a negative mood priming challenge on dysfunctional attitudes, explanatory style, and explanatory flexibility. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(2), 167-183. doi: 10.1348/014466505X35137 Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T., Walt, L., & Craighead, L. W. (2009). Self-administered optimism training: Mechanisms of change in a minimally supervised psychoeducational intervention. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(4), 350-367. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.23.4.350 Fresco, D. M., Rytwinski, N. K., & Craighead, L. W. (2007). Explanatory flexibility and negative life events interact to predict depression symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(5), 595-608. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.5.595 Fresco, D. M., Williams, N. L., & Nugent, N. R. (2006). Flexibility and Negative Affect: Examining the Associations of Explanatory Flexibility and and Coping Flexibility to Each Other and to Depression and Anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30(2), 201-210. doi: 10.1007/s10608-006-9019-8 Gibb, B. E., Beevers, C. G., Andover, M. S., & Holleran, K. (2006). The Hopelessness Theory of Depression: A Prospective Multi-Wave Test of the Vulnerability-Stress Hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30(6), 763-772. doi: 10.1007/s10608-006-9082-1 51 Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 Haeffel, G. J. (2010). Cognitive vulnerability to depressive symptoms in college students: A comparison of traditional, weakest-link, and flexibility operationalizations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(1), 92-98. doi: 10.1007/s10608-008-9224-8 Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Miller, N., & Haeffel, G. J. (2004). Cognitive Vulnerability-Stress Theories of Depression: Examining Affective Specificity in the Prediction of Depression Versus Anxiety in Three Prospective Studies. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28(3), 309-345. doi: 10.1023/B:COTR.0000031805.60529.0d Hill, K. J., & Larson, L. M. (1992). Attributional style in the reformulated learned helplessness model of depression: Cognitive processes and measurement implications. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16(1), 83-94. doi: 10.1007/BF01172958 Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2), 213-218. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999%2867%2990010-4 Jacobson, J. A. (2007). The relationship among causal uncertainty, reassurance seeking, and dysphoria. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(8), 922-939. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.8.922 Joseph, J. S., & Gray, M. J. (2014). A pilot intervention targeting attribution style and rigidity following traumatic event exposure. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(6), 708-715. doi: 10.1037/a0035171 Kammer, D. (1984). Attributional processing style differences in depressed and nondepressed individuals. Motivation and Emotion, 8(3), 211-220. doi: 10.1007/BF00991889 Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 1-39. doi: 10.1007/BF00844845 Kwon, P., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2002). A longitudinal study of the hopelessness theory of depression: Testing the diathesis-stress model within a differential reactivity and exposure framework. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(10), 1305-1321. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10043 Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Pub. Co. 52 Metalsky, G. I., & Abramson, L. Y. (1981). Attributional styles: Toward a framework for conceptualization and assessment. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollan (Eds.), Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions (pp. 13-58). New York: Academic Press. Metalsky, G. I., & Joiner, T. E. (1992). Vulnerability to depressive symptomatology: A prospective test of the diathesis-stress and causal mediation components of the hopelessness theory of depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 667-675. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.667 Moore, M. T., & Fresco, D. M. (2007). The relationship of explanatory flexibility to explanatory style. Behavior Therapy, 38(4), 325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.06.007 Pe, M. L., Raes, F., & Kuppens, P. (2013). The cognitive building blocks of emotion regulation: Ability to update working memory moderates the efficacy of rumination and reappraisal on emotion. PLoS ONE, 8(7). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069071 Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1984). Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression: Theory and evidence. Psychological Review, 91(3), 347-374. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.347 Peterson, C., Semmel, A., Baeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The Attributional Style Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6(3), 287-300. doi: 10.1007/BF01173577 Robins, C. J. (1988). Attributions and depression: Why is the literature so inconsistent? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 880-889. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.880 Sanjuan, P., Arranz, H., & Castro, A. (2012). Pessimistic attributions and coping strategies as predictors of depressive symptoms in people with coronary heart disease. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(6), 886-895. doi: 10.1177/1359105311431175 Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. New York, NY: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co; US. Selye, H. (1978). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill. Spiegler, M. D., & Guevremont, D. C. (2003). Contemporary behavior therapy. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth. Sweeney, P. D., Anderson, K., & Bailey, S. (1986). Attributional style in depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 974-991. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.974 Teasdale, J. D., Scott, J., Moore, R. G., Hayhurst, H., Pope, M., & Paykel, E. S. (2001). How does cognitive therapy prevent relapse in residual depression? 53 Evidence from a controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(3), 347-357. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.3.347 Thorsteinsson, E. B., Ryan, S. M., & Sveinbjornsdotti, S. (2013). The Mediating Effects of Social Support and Coping on the Stress-Depression Relationship in Rural and Urban Adolescents Open Journal of Depression 2(1), 1-6. Weary, G., & Edwards, J. A. (1996). Causal-uncertainty beliefs and related goal structures Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 148-181). New York, NY: Guilford Press; US. Weary, G., Vaughn, L. A., Stewart, B. D., & Edwards, J. A. (2006). Adjusting for the correspondence bias: Effects of causal uncertainty, cognitive busyness, and causal strength of situational information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(1), 87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.003 Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press. Wisco, B. E., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Interpretation bias and depressive symptoms: The role of self-relevance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(11), 1113-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.08.004 Zhou, X.-t., Wu, S.-y., Zhu, H., Zhang, B., & Cai, T.-s. (2014). Stress as a moderator between perfectionism and depression and anxiety. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(2), 341-343. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54736 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的：根據絕望理論，解釋風格為憂鬱特異質與壓力模型中的認知脆弱因子之一。過去研究也證實解釋風格在壓力與憂鬱間的調節效果。此外，有學者提出解釋彈性－個體在跨情境間解釋的變異程度，認為較低的解釋彈性亦可能是憂鬱的認知特異性之一，研究結果亦支持解釋彈性在壓力與憂鬱之間的調節效果。綜合上述，除了個體對事件的解釋內容傾向之外，個體在解釋的變異亦可能是憂鬱的認知脆弱因子。然而，過去少有研究探討個體對相同情境產生的多個解釋之變異（本研究稱之為解釋多樣性），對壓力與憂鬱關聯的影響。因此，本研究除了嘗試驗證解釋風格與解釋彈性在壓力與憂鬱間的調節效果，更試圖檢驗解釋多樣性在壓力與憂鬱間所的調節角色。此外，過去在解釋變異的研究，未曾以個體的真實生活事件作為評量材料，故本研究同時以假設性壓力事件與真實性壓力事件，探討三項解釋型態指標在特異質與壓力模式中的角色。方法：本研究以 146 位大學生為樣本，進行間隔約兩週的跨時間點研究。在第一個時間點，請參與者填寫「解釋風格、彈性及多樣性評量量表」、「生活壓力量表」以及「中文版貝克憂鬱量表第二版」，間隔約兩週後，再請參與者填寫「生活壓力量表」與「中文版貝克憂鬱量表第二版」。本研究以階層性迴歸分析，探討控制基準生活壓力與憂鬱症狀後，三個解釋型態變項在壓力與憂鬱間關聯的調節效果。結果：（1）假設性壓力事件下之解釋風格，可以顯著預測兩週後的憂鬱症狀，但在壓力與憂鬱之間未有顯著的調節效果。真實性壓力事件下之解釋風格，無法預測兩週後的憂鬱症狀，在壓力與憂鬱間亦無調節效果。（2）假設性壓力事件下之解釋彈性與真實性壓力事件下之解釋彈性，皆可調節壓力與憂鬱的關聯，相較於解釋彈性較低的個體，解釋彈性較高者，壓力與憂鬱的正向關聯較強。（3）假設性壓力事件下之解釋多樣性可調節壓力與憂鬱的關聯，在解釋多樣性較低時，壓力與憂鬱無顯著關聯，但在解釋多樣性較高者，壓力與憂鬱有顯著的正向關聯。真實性壓力事件下之解釋多樣性，無法預測兩週後的憂鬱，在壓力與憂鬱間亦無調節效果。討論：本研究嘗試以解釋複雜性、因果不確定性，以及測量上的限制等因素，來探討本研究結果的發現，並討論本研究結果的貢獻、臨床應用，以及研究限制與未來研究方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: According to the hopelessness theory, explanatory style is a cognitive vulnerability in the diathesis-stress model of depression. Findings validate the moderating role of explanatory style in the relations between stress and depression. Recently, researchers propose the construct of explanatory flexibility－the variations of one’s explanations to different situations, and findings indicate that explanatory flexibility interacts with life stress to predict depressive symptoms. The above research findings suggest, in addition to the content of one’s explanations to negative events, the explanatory flexibility is also a possible cognitive vulnerability factor. However, no past study has examined the role of individual differences in variations among several explanations one attribute to the same event (we named it explanatory diversity) in the relation with stress and depression. Therefore, the current study not only tried to replicate the moderating roles of explanatory style and explanatory flexibility on the relationship between life stress and depression, but also to assess whether explanatory diversity has moderating effect on the relationship of stress and depression. What’s more, past studies on variations of explanation have never used real life stressful events as the target events of attribution, so the current study included both hypothetical and real life stressful events to explore the role of the above-mentioned three explanatory variables in the model of diathesis-stress model. METHOD: We recruited 146 undergraduate students to carry out two time-points measurements with about two-week interval. At time 1, we asked participants to complete “the Explanatory Style, Flexibility, and Diversity Scale”, “Life Stress Scale (LSS)”, and “Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition, BDI-II”. At time 2, participants completed the LSS and BDI-II again. We used hierarchical regression analyses to explore the interaction effect between the three explanatory variables and life stress on depressive symptoms, after controlling baseline life stress and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: The findings include: (1) Explanatory style for hypothetical stressful life events could significantly predict depressive symptoms two weeks later, but couldn’t moderate the relationship between stress and depression. Explanatory style for real stressful life events couldn’t predict depressive symptoms, nor did it moderate the relationship between stress and depression. (2) Explanatory flexibility for both hypothetical and real stressful life events had a moderating effect on life stress and depressive symptoms. Relative to individuals with low explanatory flexibility, those with high explanatory flexibility displayed stronger positive association between life stress and depressive symptoms. (3) Explanatory diversity for hypothetical stressful life events interacts with life stress to predict depressive symptoms. Among those with low explanatory diversity, their life stress did not correlate with depressive symptoms, but for individuals with high explanatory diversity, life stress correlated with depressive symptoms significantly. However, explanatory diversity for real stressful life events could not predict depressive symptoms or moderate the relationship between stress and depression. DISSCUTION: The current study attempts to explain the above findings by discussing the construct of attributional complexity and causal uncertainty, and measurements limitations. Possible applications, clinical implications, and future directions are further discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:37:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R00227207-1.pdf: 1469495 bytes, checksum: 07aa87348796ff8f025dd8f1dc43c116 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 ............................................................................................................................. 1
第一節 壓力與憂鬱 ............................................................................................................. 1 第二節 憂鬱的認知特異質與壓力模型 ............................................................................. 2 第三節 解釋風格、解釋彈性、及解釋多樣性 ................................................................. 5 第四節 研究目的與假設 ................................................................................................... 11 第二章 研究方法 ................................................................................................................... 14 第一節 研究對象 ............................................................................................................... 14 第二節 研究工具 ............................................................................................................... 14 第三節 研究程序與資料分析 ........................................................................................... 19 第三章 研究結果 ................................................................................................................... 21 第一節 解釋風格在生活壓力與憂鬱關聯的調節效果 ................................................... 23 第二節 解釋彈性在生活壓力與憂鬱關聯的調節角色 ................................................... 25 第三節 解釋多樣性在生活壓力與憂鬱關聯的調節角色 ............................................... 29 第四章 綜合討論 ................................................................................................................... 33 第一節 解釋風格、解釋彈性及解釋多樣性之關聯 ....................................................... 34 第二節 解釋風格、解釋彈性及解釋多樣性對壓力與憂鬱關聯的調節效果 ............... 35 第三節 解釋變異指標與極端評量的關聯 ....................................................................... 40 第四節 真實與假設事件測量解釋型態的相異之處 ....................................................... 41 第五章 結論 ........................................................................................................................... 44 第一節 研究貢獻 ............................................................................................................... 44 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 ................................................................................... 46 參考文獻 ................................................................................................................................. 48 附錄 ......................................................................................................................................... 54 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 情緒調節 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 歸因 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 解釋風格 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 壓力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 憂鬱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 解釋彈性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | emotion regulation | en |
| dc.subject | life stress | en |
| dc.subject | depression | en |
| dc.subject | explanatory flexibility | en |
| dc.subject | explanatory style | en |
| dc.subject | attribution | en |
| dc.title | 解釋的風格、彈性及多樣性在壓力與憂鬱間的調節功能 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Explanatory Style, Explanatory Flexibility and Explanatory Diversity as Moderators between Stress and Depression | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪福建,劉同雪 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 歸因,解釋風格,解釋彈性,憂鬱,壓力,情緒調節, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | attribution,explanatory style,explanatory flexibility,depression,life stress,emotion regulation, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 70 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-04-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.44 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。