請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54660完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 孫志鴻(Chih-Hong Sun) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Han Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王俞涵 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:36:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-11 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-06-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王仕圖 (2007) 社區型非營利組織資源動員與整合：以社區發展協會為例，台灣社會福利學刊 5 (2): 103-137。
王志弘 (2003) 台北市文化治理的性質與轉變，1967-2002，台灣社會研究 52: 121-186。 江大樹、張力亞 (2014) 永續社區治理能力指標體系之建構，台灣民主季刊 11 (4): 37-83。 江明修、曾冠球 (2003) 公共行政制度設計之辯證：公民治理型模的檢視，中國行政評論 12 (3): 119-138。 李宗勳 (2004) 公私協力與委外化的效應與價值：一項進行中的治理改造工程，公共行政學報 12: 41-77。 李柏諭 (2005) 公私協力與社區治理的理論與實務：我國社區大學與政府經驗，公共行政學報 16: 59-106。 吳瓊恩 (2002) 公共行政學發展趨勢的探究：三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論基礎，公共行政學報 7: 173-220。 林嘉誠 (2006) 知識型政府的意涵與發展，考銓季刊 48: 1-18。 柯于璋 (2005) 社區主義治理模式之理論與實踐─兼論台灣地區社區政策，公共行政學報 16: 33-57。 柯于璋 (2009) 從公民治理的觀點論台灣參與式社區規劃之課題與展望，台灣土地研究 12 (1): 125-151。 許立一 (2008) 實質公民參與：台灣政治後現代性危機的解決途徑？台灣科技大學人文社會學報 4: 133-158。 陳恒鈞 (2009) 參與治理是趨勢? 或是迷思? 文官制度季刊 2009 特刊: 113-144。 陳敦源 (2009) 透明之下的課責：台灣民主治理中官民信任關係的重建基礎，文官制度季刊 1 (2): 21-55。 陳敦源、潘競恆 (2011) 政府就是 [我們]：Web 2.0時代民主治理的希望或幻夢？研考雙月刊 35 (4): 23-35。 黃東益、陳敦源 (2004) 電子化政府與商議式民主之實踐，台灣民主季刊 1 (4): 1-34。 黃源協、劉素珍 (2009) 社會資本對台灣社區發展之政策意涵，行政暨政策學報 48: 155-92。 臺北市信義區戶政事務所 (2015) 臺北市信義區戶政事務所103年各里人口數按性別、年齡分類統計表，http://xyhr.gov.taipei/ (擷取日期：2015.06.03)。 趙永茂 (2007) 台灣地方治理的發展策略與方向，研習論壇 74: 7-14。 鍾京佑 (2003) 全球治理與公民社會：台灣非政府組織參與國際社會的觀點，政治科學論叢 18: 33。 鍾京佑 (2004) 全球化與公民社會的治理，中山人文社會科學期刊 12 (1): 99-123。 AfDB. (1999) Bank group policy on good governance, http://www.afdb.org/en/ (accessed 29 Jan 2015). Anastasia, S. T. R. A. T. I. G. E. A. (2012) The concept of smart cities towards community development. Networks and Communication Studies, NETCOM 26: 3-4. Andrienko, N., & Andrienko, G. (2006) Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data. Berlin: Springer. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., & Voss, H. (2003) GIS for everyone: the CommonGIS project and beyond. In: M. Peterson (ed.), Maps and the internet, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 131-146. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Demsar, U., Dransch, D., Dykes, J., Fabrikant, S. I., Jern M., Kraak M., Schumann H., & Tominski, C. (2010) Space, time and visual analytics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24 (10): 1577-1600. Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners 35 (4): 216-224. AsDB. (1995) Governance: sound development management, http://www.adb.org/ (accessed 29 Jan 2015) Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994) Ethnography and participant observation. In: N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 248-261. Banner, G. (2002) Community governance and the new central–local relationship. International Social Science Journal 54 (172): 217-231. Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994) Collecting data using a semi‐structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19 (2): 328-335. Batty, M., Hudson-Smith, A., Milton, R., & Crooks, A. (2010) Map mashups, Web 2.0 and the GIS revolution. Annals of GIS 16 (1): 1-13. Baud, I. S. A., Pfeffer, K., Sydenstricker, J., & Scott, D. (2011) Developing participatory “spatial” knowledge models in metropolitan governance networks for sustainable development. Chance2Sustain Literature Review 1-20. Bennett, N. J., & Dearden, P. (2014) Why local people do not support conservation: community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy 44: 107-116. Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O'Leary, R. (2005) The new governance: practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review 65 (5): 547-558. Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., & Mondini, G. (2014) Towards smart and sustainable communities. Advanced Engineering Forum 11: 131-135. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002) Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal 112 (483): 419-436. Box, R. C. (1997) Citizen governance: leading American communities into the 21st century. Sage Publications. Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011) Public–private partnerships: perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development 31 (1): 2-14. Burton, P. (2004) Power to the people? How to judge public participation. Local Economy 19 (3): 193-198. Cho, W. K. T., & Gimpel, J. G. (2012) Geographic information systems and the spatial dimensions of American politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 443-460. Choguill, M. B. G. (1996) A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat international 20 (3): 431-444. Clarke, M., & Stewart, J. (1994) The local authority and the new community governance. Regional Studies 28 (2): 201-219. Clarke, M. & Stewart, J. (1997) Handling the wicked issues: a challenge for government. Birmingham: School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001) E-governance and smart communities a social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review 19 (1): 80-93. Crowe, A. (2012) Disasters 2.0: the application of social media systems for modern emergency management. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Cuthill, M. (2002) Exploratory research: citizen participation, local government and sustainable development in Australia. Sustainable Development 10 (2): 79-89. De Ryck, P., Nikiforakis, N., Desmet, L., Piessens, F., & Joosen, W. (2012) Serene: self-reliant client-side protection against session fixation. In: Distributed applications and interoperable systems, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 59-72. Delamont, S. (2004) Ethnography and participant observation. In: C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (eds.), Qualitative research practice, London: Sage, pp. 217-229. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2011) The new public service: serving, not steering. New York: ME Sharpe. Denters, B., & Klok, P. J. (2010) Rebuilding Roombeek: patterns of citizen participation in urban governance. Urban Affairs Review 45 (5): 583-607. Denzin, N. K. (1970) The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Transaction Publishers. D’Hondt, E., Stevens, M., & Jacobs, A. (2013) Participatory noise mapping works! An evaluation of participatory sensing as an alternative to standard techniques for environmental monitoring. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 9 (5): 681-694. Doornbos, M. (2001) 'Good governance': the rise and decline of a policy metaphor? Journal of Development Studies 37 (6): 93-108. Eger, J. (1997) Cyberspace and cybersplace: building the smart communities of tomorrow, http://www.smartcommunities.org/pub_cyberplace.htm (accessed 20 April 2015) Elwood, S. (2008) Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal 72 (3-4): 173-183. Eversole, R. (2011) Community agency and community engagement: re-theorising participation in governance. Journal of Public Policy 31 (01): 51-71. Ferguson, D., Sairamesh, J., and Feldman, S. (2004) Open frameworks for information cities. Communications of the ACM 47 (2): 45-49. Forrer, J., Kee, J. E., Newcomer, K. E., & Boyer, E. (2010) Public–private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review 70 (3): 475-484. Fu, P., & Sun, J. (2010) Web GIS: principles and applications. Esri Press. Fukuyama, F. (2013) What is governance? Governance 26 (3): 347-368. Ganapati, S. (2011) Uses of public participation geographic information systems applications in E‐government. Public Administration Review 71 (3): 425-434. Gibin, M., Singleton, A., Milton, R., Mateos, P., & Longley, P. (2008) An exploratory cartographic visualisation of London through the Google Maps API. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 1 (2): 85-97. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012) Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 17 (3): 319-336. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014) Being smart: emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 31: I1-I8. Gisselquist, R. M. (2012) Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy. WIDER Working Paper. Goadrich, M. H., & Rogers, M. P. (2011) Smart smartphone development: iOS versus Android. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 607-612). Gold, R. L. (1958) Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces 36 (3): 217-223. Goodchild, M. F. (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69 (4): 211–221. Grindle, M. S. (2004) Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance 17 (4): 525-548. Grindle, M. (2012) Good governance: the inflation of an idea. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Gushiken, B. (2013) Integrating edmodo into a high school service club: to promote interactive online communication. TCC Worldwide Online Conference. Harris, T. M., Weiner, D., Warner, T. A., & Levin, R. (1995) Pursuing social goals through participatory geographic information systems. In: Pickles, J. (ed.), Ground truth: the social implications of geographic information systems, New York: Guilford, pp. 196-222. Heller, K., Price, R. H., Reinharz, S., Riger, S. & Wandersman, A. (1984). Psychology and community change: Challenges of the future (2nd ed.). Homewood: Dorsey. Hunt, J., Smith, D., Garling, S., & Sanders, W. (2008) Contested governance: culture, power and institutions in Indigenous Australia. ANUE Press. Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review 64 (1): 55-65. Jin, G. Z., & Lee, J. (2014) Inspection technology, detection, and compliance: evidence from Florida restaurant inspections. The RAND Journal of Economics 45 (4): 885-917. John, P. (2009) Can citizen governance redress the representative bias of political participation? Public Administration Review 69 (3): 494-503. Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2013) Situating the adoption of VGI by government. In: D. Z. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. F. Goodchild (eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge, New York: Springer, pp. 65-81. Jorgensen, D. L. (Ed.). (1989) Participant observation: a methodology for human studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Jupp, E. (2007) Participation, local knowledge and empowerment: researching public space with young people. Environment and planning A 39 (12): 2832. Kawulich, B. B. (2005) Participant observation as a data collection method. Qualitative Social Research 6 (2). Kearns, A. & Paddison, R. (2000) New challenges for urban governance. Urban Studies 37 (5-6): 845-850. Keim, D., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J. D., Görg, C., Kohlhammer, J., & Melançon, G. (2008) Visual analytics: definition, process, and challenges. In: Kerren, A., Stasko, J., Fekete, J. D., North, C. (eds.), Human-centered issues and perspectives, Berlin: Springer, pp. 154-175. Kesby, M. (2014) Retheorizing empowerment‐through‐participation as a performance in space: beyond tyranny to transformation. Signs 40 (1). Kettl, D. F. (2000) The transformation of governance: globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review 60 (6): 488-497. Kim, M. J., Cho, M. E., & Chae, H. H. (2014) A smart community for placemaking in housing complexes. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 13 (3): 539-546. Kim, P. S., Halligan, J., Cho, N., Oh, C. H., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2005) Toward participatory and transparent governance: report on the sixth global forum on reinventing government. Public Administration Review 65 (6): 646-654. Kingston, R., Carver, S., Evans, A., & Turton, I. (2000) Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, environment and urban systems 24 (2): 109-125. Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002) Private actors and the state: internationalization and changing patterns of governance. Governance 15 (1): 41-63. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993) Modern governance: new government-society interactions. London: SAGE Publications. Kraak, M. J. (2004) The role of the map in a Web-GIS environment. Journal of Geographical Systems 6 (2): 83-93. Kuhn, W. (2007) Volunteered geographic information and GIScience, http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/ (accessed 11 May 2013) Kwon, H. J., & Kim, E. (2014) Poverty reduction and good governance: examining the rationale of the millennium development goals. Development and Change 45 (2): 353-375. Lane, N. D., Miluzzo, E., Lu, H., Peebles, D., Choudhury, T., & Campbell, A. T. (2010) A survey of mobile phone sensing. Communications Magazine, IEEE 48 (9): 140-150. Lasker, R. D., & Weiss, E. S. (2003) Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health 80 (1): 14-47. Leech, B. L. (2002) Asking questions: techniques for semistructured interviews. Political Science & Politics 35 (04): 665-668. Ma, J., Yang, L. T., Apduhan, B. O., Huang, R., Barolli, L., & Takizawa, M. (2005) Towards a smart world and ubiquitous intelligence: a walkthrough from smart things to smart hyperspaces and UbicKids. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications 1 (1): 53-68. MacEachren, A. M., & Brewer, I. (2004) Developing a conceptual framework for visually-enabled geocollaboration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18 (1): 1-34. Maisonneuve, N., Stevens, M., Niessen, M. E., Hanappe, P., & Steels, L. (2009) Citizen noise pollution monitoring. Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference on digital government research: social networks: making connections between citizens, data and government (pp. 96-103). Mayntz, R. (1998). New challenges to governance theory. Florence, Italy: European University Institute, Robert Schumann Centre. McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012) Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance? Geoforum 43 (1): 81-94. Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2010) Examining citizen participation: local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies 36 (4): 477-491. Miller, C. C. (2006) A beast in the field: the Google Maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 41 (3): 187-199. Morse, S. W. (2009) Smart communities: how citizens and local leaders can use strategic thinking to build a brighter future. John Wiley & Sons. Murdoch, J., & Abram, S. (1998) Defining the limits of community governance. Journal of Rural Studies 14 (1): 41-50. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011) Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291). Neis, P., & Zielstra D. (2014) Recent developments and future trends in volunteered geographic information research: the case of OpenStreetMap. Future Internet 6 (1): 76-106. Oxendine, C. E., & Waters N. (2014) No‐notice urban evacuations: using crowdsourced mobile data to minimize risk. Geography Compass 8 (1): 49-62. Parag, Y., Hamilton, J., White, V., & Hogan, B. (2013) Network approach for local and community governance of energy: the case of Oxfordshire. Energy Policy 62: 1064-1077. Parigi, V. K. (2004) Citizen governance: concept and practice. CGG Collected Working Papers 72. Peng, Z. R., & Tsou, M. H. (2003) Internet GIS: distributed geographic information services for the internet and wireless networks. John Wiley & Sons. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998) Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 223-243. Pierre, J., & Peters, G. B. (2000) Governance, politics and the state. Basingstoke : Macmillan Publishers Limited. Qudrat-I Elahi, K. (2009) UNDP on good governance. International Journal of Social Economics 36 (12): 1167-1180. Raco, M., & Lin, W. I. (2012) Urban sustainability, conflict management, and the geographies of postpoliticism: a case study of Taipei. Environment and Planning-Part C 30 (2): 191-208. Raco, M., Imrie, R., & Lin, W. I. (2011) Community governance, critical cosmopolitanism and urban change: observations from Taipei, Taiwan. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 274-294. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies 44 (4): 652-667. Rinner, C., Keßler, C., & Andrulis, S. (2008) The use of web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32 (5): 386-395. Roe, M. J. (2011) Learning tools for innovation. Leadership 40 (4): 32-38. Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E. O. (Eds.). (1992) Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ross, K., & Osborne, S. P. (1999) Making a reality of community governance. Structuring government-voluntary sector relationships at the local level. Public Policy and Administration 14 (2): 49-61. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, technology & human values 25 (1): 3-29. Schroeder, P. (1997) A public participation approach to charting information spaces. ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention and Exposition Technical Papers 5: 244-253. Shaltry, C., Henriksen, D., Wu, M. L., & Dickson, W. P. (2013) Situated learning with online portfolios, classroom websites and Facebook. TechTrends 57 (3): 20-25. Smouts, M. C. (1998) The proper use of governance in international relations. International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 81-89. Smith, L. G. (1983) Impact assessment and sustainable resource management. Harlow, UK: Longman. Somerville, P. (2005) Community governance and democracy. Policy & Politics 33 (1): 117-144. Sprake, J., & P. Rogers. (2014) Crowds, citizens and sensors: process and practice for mobilising learning. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18 (3): 753-764. Steiniger, S., & Bocher, E. (2009) An overview on current free and open source desktop GIS developments. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 23 (10): 1345-1370. Steiniger, S., & Hay, G. J. (2009) Free and open source geographic information tools for landscape ecology. Ecological Informatics 4 (4): 183-195. Steinberg, S. J., & Steinberg, S. L. (2006) Geographic information systems for the social sciences: investigating space and place. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Stoker, G. (2004) New localism, participation and networked community governance, http://www.ipeg.org.uk/ (accessed 6 Jan 2014) Sullivan, H. (2001) Modernisation, democratisation and community governance. Local Government Studies 27 (3): 1-24. Tewdwr-Jones, M., Morphet, J., & Allmendinger, P. (2006) The contested strategies of local governance: community strategies, development plans, and local government modernisation. Environment and Planning A 38 (3): 533-551. Tsou, M. H. (2004) Integrated mobile GIS and wireless internet map servers for environmental monitoring and management. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 31 (3): 153-165. Turner, A. (2006) Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media UNDP. (1997) Governance for sustainable human development: a UNDP policy document, http://www.pogar.org/ (accessed 29 Jan 2015) UNESCAP. (2006) What is good governance? http://www.unescap.org/ (accessed 29 Jan 2015) WB. (1992) Governance and development, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/ (accessed 29 Jan 2015) Whiting, L. S. (2008) Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers. Nursing Standard 22 (23): 35-40. Woodruff, A., & Mankoff J. (2009) Environmental sustainability. IEEE Pervasive Computing 8 (1): 18-21. Woods, N. (2000) The challenge of good governance for the IMF and the World Bank themselves. World Development 28 (5): 823-841. Xia, F., & Ma, J. (2011) Building smart communities with cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of 1st international symposium on from digital footprints to social and community intelligence (pp. 1-6). Yu, L., & Gong, P. (2012) Google Earth as a virtual globe tool for earth science applications at the global scale: progress and perspectives. International Journal of Remote Sensing 33 (12): 3966-3986. Zeldin, S., Camino, L., & Calvert, M. (2007) Toward an understanding of youth in community governance: policy priorities and research directions. Análise Psicológica 25 (1): 77-95. Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988) Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of community psychology 16 (5): 725-750. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54660 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在治理問題多而紛雜的環境中，該如何即時地切中問題、解決問題、成就好的治理，成了本研究的開啟動機。龐大行政單元的問題複雜而難以解決，若將尺度從城鄉的最小層級「社區」開始，村里、鄉鎮市區、縣市、乃至國家，由下而上地推演後就能成就完善的治理，更期望將治理的方向引領至智慧社區一途，在社區的地理尺度中，透過技術與社會因子，以達成全面的治理整合關係，為民眾自主、可重複使用的模型，民眾透過各種智慧方式，對地方事務的決策有了更好的公眾參與機會，能以此解決社區問題，達成最佳的公民治理方向，使得生活品質更為提升。為達成智慧社區，本研究提出框架將地理概念納入於「智慧社區平台 (smart community platform, SCP)」，設計以網路為基底的時空資訊工具：智慧社區時空資訊平台、智慧社區手機程式、社區系統，以促成居民的培力、喚起自主地關懷生活環境，達成技術智慧；另一方面，主張打造參與網絡，由社區本體籌畫資源，連結外來青年志願者、公私部門進入社區單元，踏入問題的討論過程、制定執行符合地方特質的方案，以多方整合民眾的聲音，深化群眾智慧。在台北市雙和社區的示範案例下，由於智慧社區的導入，即便侷限於有限資源，仍能產出有效的解決辦法，社區問題因此被有效處理。智慧社區以技術的實踐、群眾的連結，發現治理能轉向善治前進，達成有效與延續性的治理，當架構有著能快速複製的優勢，因而能往自主、永續的公民治理方向邁進。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | People always yearn for a society without problems at all times. How do we find answers for these problems? In large regions, problems are so multi-dimensional and complicated that we can hardly find solutions for them, to say nothing of discussing enough with related people and organizations. Nevertheless, if we narrow down the scope to the smallest local area, i.e., a community, it will be easier to find out unsolved issues and talk them over with related stakeholders in order to set right directions for governance. Furthermore, if we put the problem-solving process into actions and extend it to every community, when there is no problem in communities, we will have fit cities, performing good governance. As a result, this study will focus on communities, and what is more, we hope to make a guide to smart communities. In this study, we define a smart community as a duplicatable model, in which people can improve the quality of life by applying new technologies and operating collective intelligence to provide solutions to community problems; moreover, the model is conducted by community members themselves. To fulfill the concept of smart communities, we propose an innovative framework, smart community platform (SCP), designing spatial-temporal information tools and participation network to let people have a better chance to take part in local decision making. The framework, including a web-based Geographic Information System platform, a mobile app, and a community system, will improve public participation by involving local people, volunteers, different organizations, and government agencies into the process of citizen governance, finally achieving public-private partnerships. Furthermore, we have conducted a case study in Shuangho Community, Taipei. By implementing the framework, it is shown that the concept of smart communities is a useful means of engaging the public in community affairs. In conclusion, the contribution of the research is to create an approach to empower people, develop public participation, promote citizen governance, and finally achieve good governance. Accordingly, with limited resources, people can find answers for community problems, and develop sustainability plans for communities. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:36:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02228006-1.pdf: 8240859 bytes, checksum: e98283de8b59659b639b6bc39a4e1607 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書--I
謝辭--II 中文摘要--III 英文摘要--IV 第一章、緒論--1 第一節、研究背景與動機--2 第二節、研究目的--5 第三節、研究流程--7 第二章、文獻回顧--9 第一節、從治理、社區治理到公民治理--10 第二節、台灣的公民治理--14 第三節、善治--18 第四節、小結：鑲嵌於善治脈絡的台灣公民治理--20 第三章、研究方法--21 第一節、研究架構--22 第二節、研究方法--24 一、智慧社區平台之打造--24 二、智慧社區平台之應用--31 第四章、智慧社區平台之打造--34 第一節、技術智慧：時空資訊工具建置--35 一、網際網路地理資訊系統 (Web-GIS)--35 二、行動式地理資訊系統 (Mobile-GIS)--38 三、社區系統--40 第二節、群眾智慧：參與網絡型塑--44 一、社區本體--44 二、志願者--45 三、公私協力--46 第三節、智慧連結：永續公民治理--48 第五章、智慧社區平台之應用--49 第一節、研究區個案選擇--50 第二節、智慧社區平台導入--54 第三節、表現與評估--68 ㄧ、參與--71 二、共識決策--74 三、公平--75 四、法治--75 五、透明度--76 六、課責--77 七、回應性--78 八、效率與效能--79 九、策略願景--79 第六章、結論與建議--81 第一節、研究結論--82 一、治理的轉變--82 二、技術智慧的實踐--84 三、群眾智慧的連結--85 四、有效與永續的治理--86 五、治理貢獻與對話--87 六、智慧社區平台複製與推廣--88 第二節、建議與後續研究方向--91 參考文獻--92 附錄一、訪談大綱--103 附錄二、時空資訊工具原始碼--105 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 智慧社區公民治理之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Smart Community: Research on Citizen Governance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周學政(Hsueh-Cheng Chou),蔡博文(Bor-Wen Tsai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 智慧社區,公民治理,時空資訊工具,參與網絡, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | smart community,citizen governance,spatial-temporal information tool,participation network, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 126 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-06-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 地理環境資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。