Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54638Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 洪茂蔚(Mao-Wei Hung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jin Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王晉 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:36:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-11 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-06-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李維安, & 李濱. (2008). 機構投資者介入公司治理效果的實證研究——基于CCGI~(NK)的經驗研究. 南開管理評論(01), 4-14.
连玉君, 彭方平, & 苏治. (2010). 融资约束与流动性管理行为. 金融研究(10), 158-171. 盧馨, 鄭陽飛, & 李建明. (2013). 融資約束對企業R&D投資的影響研究——來自中國高新技術上市公司的經驗證據. 會計研究(05), 51-58+96. 羅紹德, & 劉春光. (2009). 企業R&D投入活動的影響因素分析——基于企業財務資源觀. 財經理論與實踐(01), 56-60. 潘承烈. (2006). 自主創新何以要以企業為主體. 學習與研究(3), 26-28. 权小锋, & 尹洪英. (2012). 投资者注意力、信息获利与管理层择机交易. 上海经济研究(07). 宋冬林, & 張跡. (2002). 機構投資者參與公司治理的經濟學分析. 經濟縱橫(05), 17-20. 宋双杰, 曹晖, & 杨坤. (2011). 投资者关注与IPO异象——来自网络搜索量的经验证据. 经济研究(S1). 唐清泉, 徐欣, & 曹媛. (2009). 股權激勵、研發投入與企業可持續發展——來自中國上市公司的證據. 山西財經大學學報(08), 77-84. 王琨, & 肖星. (2005). 機構投資者持股與關聯方占用的實證研究. 南開管理評論(02), 27-33. 王奇波. (2006). 機構投資者參與的股權制衡研究. 東北財經大學學報(01), 32-35. 王彦超. (2009). 融资约束、现金持有与过度投资. 金融研究(7), 121-133. 王詠梅, & 王亞平. (2011). 機構投資者如何影響市場的信息效率——來自中國的經驗證據. 金融研究(10). 吳曉暉, & 姜彥福. (2006). 機構投資者治理效率研究. 統計研究(09), 33-36. 俞慶進, & 張兵. (2012). 投資者有限關注與股票收益——以百度指數作為關注度的一項實證研究. 金融研究(08), 152-165. 張純, & 呂偉. (2007). 信息披露、市場關注與融資約束. 會計研究(11), 32-38+95. 張維迎. (1999). 企業理論與國有企業改革: 北京大學出版社. 張雅慧, 萬迪昉, & 付雷鳴. (2011). 股票收益的媒體效應:風險補償還是過度關注弱勢. 金融研究(08). 中關村發展藍皮書課題組. (2005). 提升民營科技企業創新力: 社會科學文獻出版社. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500. Bloch, C. (2005). R&D investment and internal finance: the cash flow effect. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(3), 213-223. doi: 10.1080/1043859042000312710 Bougheas, S., & Gorg, H. (2003). Is R&D financially constrained? Theory and evidence from Irish manufacturing. Review of Industrial Organization, 22(2), 159. Brealey, R., Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). INFORMATIONAL ASYMMETRIES, FINANCIAL STRUCTURE, AND FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371-387. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03277.x Brown, Jr., & Petersen, B. (2010). Public entrants, public equity finance and creative destruction. Journal Of Banking & Finance, 34(5), 1077-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.11.005 Bushee, B. J., & Noe, C. F. (2000). Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(SUPP), 171-207. Chemmanur, T., & Yan, A. (2010). Advertising, investor recognition, and stock returns. Unpublished working paper. Boston College and Fordham University. Coffee, J. C., Jr. (1991). Liquidity versus control: the institutional investor as corporate monitor. Columbia Law Review, 91(6), 1277-1368. Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2011). R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms. Small Business Economics, 36(1), 65-83. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9189-3 Da, Z., Engelberg, J., & Gao, P. (2011). In search of attention. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1461-1499. Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R., & Petersen, B. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1, 141-206. Gervais, S., Kaniel, R., & Mingelgrin, D. H. (2001). The high‐volume return premium. The Journal of Finance, 56(3), 877-919. Greenwald, B., Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1984). Informational Imperfections in the Capital Market and Macroeconomic Fluctuations. The American Economic Review, 74(2), 194-199. Grullon, G., Kanatas, G., & Weston, J. P. (2004). Advertising, breadth of ownership, and liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 17(2), 439-461. Hall, B. H. (1992). Investment and research and development at the firm level: does the source of financing matter? : National Bureau of Economic Research. Hall, B. H. (2002). The Financing of Research and Development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35-51. Hammermesh, D. S., & Pfann, G. A. (1996). Adjustment costs in factor demand. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1264. Himmelberg, C. P., & Petersen, B. C. (1994). R & D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 38-51. doi: 10.2307/2109824 Hou, K., Peng, L., & Xiong, W. (2006). A tale of two anomalies: The implication of investor attention for price and earnings momentum. Unpublished paper, Ohio State University, Baruch College, and Princeton University. Available at http://ssrn. com/abstract, 976394. Jaffee, D. M., & Russell, T. (1976). Imperfect Information, Uncertainty, and Credit Rationing. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 651-666. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort: Prentice-Hall. Kochhar, R., & David, P. (1996). Institutional Investors and Firm Innovation: A Test of Competing Hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 73-84. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1987(3), 783-831. doi: 10.2307/2534454 Lou, D. (2009). Attracting investor attention through advertising. Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., & Wagner, S. (1981). Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study. Economic Journal, 91, 907-918. McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595-612. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C Millet-Reyes, B. (2004). R&D Intensity and Financing Constraints. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 10(2). Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0 Peng, L., Xiong, W., & Bollerslev, T. (2007). Investor Attention and Time‐varying Comovements. European Financial Management, 13(3), 394-422. Ross, S. A. (1977). The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive-Signalling Approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23-40. doi: 10.2307/3003485 Savignac, F. (2007). The impact of financial constraints on innovation: What can be learned from a direct measure? (Vol. 01): Banque de France. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Socialism, capitalism and democracy: Harper and Brothers. Shi, C. (2003). On the trade-off between the future benefits and riskiness of R&D: a bondholders’ perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(2), 227-254. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(03)00020-X Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461-488. Sias, R. W. (1996). Volatility and the institutional investor. Financial Analysts Journal, 13-20. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393-410. Szewczyk, S. H., Tsetsekos, G. P., & Varma, R. (1992). Institutional Ownership and the Liquidity of Common Stock Offerings. Financial Review, 27(2), 211-225. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6288.1992.tb01314.x Wahal, S., & McConnell, J. J. (2000). Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia? Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(3), 307-329. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(00)00005-5 Yuan, Y. (2008). Attention and trading. Unpublished Working Paper. University of Pennsylvania. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54638 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文採用2008年至2014年中國A股市場對研發費用進行了披露的全部高新技術上市公司作為樣本,從R&D投資對內部現金流的敏感性的視角,對高新技術企業R&D投資所面臨的融資約束問題進行了實證研究。首先,本文結合信息不對稱理論和委託代理理論分析了企業R&D投資的融資約束問題;其次,從理論上探討了機構持股比例和大眾關注度對R&D投資所面臨的融資約束的緩解作用;最後,以2008-2014年中國A股高新技術上市公司的研發數據作為研究樣本,通過檢驗R&D投資-現金流敏感性驗證企業的R&D投資是否存在融資約束,並在此基礎上進一步檢驗了機構持股比例和大眾關注度對R&D投資-現金流敏感性的影響。
研究結果表明:(1)中國高新技術上市公司的R&D投資存在一定程度的融資約束問題,企業在為研發活動融資時明顯依賴於內部現金流,其次是權益融資,最後才是債務融資渠道;(2)R&D投資支出與機構持股比例顯著正相關,機構持股比例的提高有助於促進企業進行R&D投資;(3)隨著大眾關注度的提高,R&D投資-現金流敏感性顯著減弱,即一般投資者的主動關注和信息發掘行為可以降低企業R&D投資所面臨的融資約束程度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper we re-examine the financing constraints on R&D investment from the respect of investment-cash flow sensitivity, by making an empirical analysis on the samples of the high and new technology listed companies which had disclosed R&D expenses during the period from 2008 to 2014 in China’s A-share market. First of all, we analyze the corporate R&D financing constraints based on information asymmetry and principal-agent theory. Secondly, we theoretically discuss the possibility of institutional ownership and public attention being information asymmetry proxy variables related to R&D investment-cash flow sensitivity. Finally, we test the R&D investment of our sample companies whether being in the existence of financing constraints, and the buffering effect of institutional ownership and public attention on R&D financing constraints.
Our findings indicate that: (1) China’s High and new technology listed companies is financially constrained on R&D investment, their investment decisions strongly depend on corporate internal cash flow; (2) the relationship between R&D investment and institutional ownership is significantly positive, which indicates that the increasing of institutional ownership can promote the R&D investment; (3) to a certain extent, public attention solves the information asymmetry problem caused by R&D activities and decreases the degree of R&D financing constraints. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:36:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02724063-1.pdf: 623127 bytes, checksum: d2480fb3916cec26ac95a8a0434c4903 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1. 研究背景 1 1.2. 研究意義與創新之處 2 1.3. 研究思路與論文結構 3 第二章 文獻回顧與研究假設 5 2.1. 融資約束的理論基礎 5 2.1.1. 信息不對稱理論 5 2.1.2. 融資優序理論 7 2.1.3. 委託代理理論 9 2.1.4. 企業投資的融資約束 10 2.2. 融資約束與R&D投資 11 2.2.1. R&D投資的特徵分析 11 2.2.2. R&D投資的融資約束分析 13 2.3. 機構持股比例 16 2.3.1. 機構持股與公司治理 16 2.3.2. 機構持股與信息不對稱 17 2.4. 大眾關注度 18 第三章 研究設計 22 3.1. 樣本選取與數據來源 22 3.2. 模型設計與變量說明 23 3.2.1. 模型設計 23 3.2.2. 變量說明 24 第四章 實證結果分析 29 4.1. 描述性統計結果 29 4.1.1. 總體樣本的統計分析 29 4.1.2. 不同機構持股比例樣本的統計分析 30 4.1.3. 搜索量數據的統計分析 31 4.2. 相關性分析 32 4.3. 回歸結果分析 34 4.3.1. R&D投資的融資約束檢驗 37 4.3.2. 機構持股比例與企業R&D投資 38 4.3.3. 內部現金流與機構持股比例的交叉項 38 4.3.4. 內部現金流與大眾關注度的交叉項 40 第五章 基本結論與研究展望 43 5.1. 結論與討論 43 5.2. 政策建議 44 5.3. 研究局限與展望 45 参考文獻 47 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 融資約束 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | R&D投資 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信息不對稱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 機構持股比例 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 大眾關注度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高新技術上市公司 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | R&D投資 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信息不對稱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 融資約束 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 機構持股比例 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 大眾關注度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高新技術上市公司 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | R&D investment | en |
| dc.subject | Information asymmetry | en |
| dc.subject | R&D investment | en |
| dc.subject | High and new technology listed companies | en |
| dc.subject | Public attention | en |
| dc.subject | Institutional ownership | en |
| dc.subject | Information asymmetry | en |
| dc.subject | Financing constraints | en |
| dc.subject | Financing constraints | en |
| dc.subject | Institutional ownership | en |
| dc.subject | Public attention | en |
| dc.subject | High and new technology listed companies | en |
| dc.title | 信息不對稱、融資約束與企業R&D投資——來自中國A股高新技術上市公司的證據 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Information Asymmetry, Financing Constraints and Corporate R&D Investment: Empirical Evidence from the High and New Technology Listed Companies in China’s A-share Market | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡豐澤,蔡佳芬,馮詩蘋,邱琦倫 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | R&D投資,信息不對稱,融資約束,機構持股比例,大眾關注度,高新技術上市公司, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | R&D investment,Information asymmetry,Financing constraints,Institutional ownership,Public attention,High and new technology listed companies, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 51 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-06-22 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 國際企業學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf Restricted Access | 608.52 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
