請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54581完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曾智揚(Chin-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Che-Yu Hsu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許哲瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:05:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-06-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
林旻毅,2004,銷管費用僵固性之額外證據,私立輔仁大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 林有志、傅鍾仁及陳筱平,2011,成本僵固性之實證研究,當代會計,第十二卷第二期:191-220。 高世隆,2010,成本僵固性之堆疊與品牌效用關聯性之研究-以筆記型電腦相關產業為例,國立臺北大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 陳肇榮,1983,運用財務比率預測財務危機之實證研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 曾聯洲,2003,銷管費用僵固性之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 嚴友廷,2010,銷管費用僵固性與股價波動關聯性之研究─以台灣上市公司為例,國立臺北大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 Altman E.I. 1968. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance September1968:589-609. Altman E.I., and M.Brenner. 1981. Information Effects and Stock Market Response to Signs of Firm Deterioration. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis March 1981:35-51. Anderson, M. C., R. D. Banker, and S. N. Janakiraman. 2003. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research 41 (1): 47-63. Bahnson, P. R., and J. W. Bartley. 1992. The sensitivity of failure prediction models to alternative definitions of failure.' Advances in Accounting 10: 255-278. Balakrishnan, M. J. Peterson, and N. S. Soderstrom. 2004. Does capacity utilization affect the “stickiness” of costs?Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 19 (3): 283-299. Balakrishnan, R., and T. S. Gruca. 2008. Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (4): 993-1006. Banker, R. D., and L. Chen. 2006a. Predicting earnings using a model based on cost variability and cost stickiness. The Accounting Review 81 (2): 285-307. Banker, R. D., and L. Chen. 2006b. Labor market characteristics and cross-country differences in cost stickiness. Working Paper, Temple University. Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, and L. T. Chen. 2011. Impact of labor laws on cost behavior. SSRN Working Paper Series. Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, M. Ciftci, and R. Mashruwala. 2014. The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research 26(2): 221-242. Basu, Sam N. and Rolfes, Harold L. Jr. 1994. Strategic Credit Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Blum, M. 1974. Failing company discriminant analysis. Journal of Accounting Research: 1-25. Bredart.2014.Financial distress and corporate governance: the impact of board configuration; International Business Research Vol.7, NO. 3 Butt, U. R., T. Chamberlain, and S. Sarkar. 2013. Accrual manipulation and earnings management activities around debt covenant violation. International Atlantic Economy Society, 20, 119-159. Calleja, K., M. Steliaros, and D. C. Thomas. 2006. A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparison. Management Accounting Research 17 (2): 127–140. Chen, C. W., and J. Wei. 1993. Creditors’ decisions to waive violations of Accounting-Based Debt covenants. The Accounting Review 68: 218-232 Chen, C. X., H. Lu, and T. Sougiannis. 2012. The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (1): 252–282. Cooper, R., and R. Kaplan. 1998. The promise—and peril—of integrated cost systems. Harvard Business Review 76.4: 109-119. Dalton, K. V., J. S. Greenlees, and K. J. Stewart. 1998. Incorporating a geometric mean formula into the CPI. Monthly Lab. Rev 121, 3. Defond, L. M., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt-covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 145-176. Dierynck, B., W. R. Landsman, and A. Renders. 2012. Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in Belgian private firms. The Accounting Review 87 (4): 1219-1246. Estrada, J. 2009. Geometric mean maximization: an overlooked portfolio approach?. The Journal of Investing 22, 109-119. He, D., J. Teruya, and T. Shimizu, 2010, Sticky selling, general, and administrative cost behavior and its changes in Japan. Global Journal of Business Research 4 (4), 1-10. Jelinek, K. 2007. The Effect of Leverage Increases on Earnings Management. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 13(2). Kama, I., and D. Weiss. 2013. Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research 51 (1): 201-224. Krishnan, V. S., and R. C. Moyer. 1994. Bankruptcy costs and the financial leasing decision. Financial Management, 31-42. Masulis, R. W., C. Wang, and F. Xie. 2007. Corporate governance and acquirer returns. The Journal of Finance 62.4: 1851-1889. Miller, D. T., and M. Ross. 1975. Self-serving bias in attribution of causality: fact or Fiction? Psychological Bulletin 82: 213-225. Noreen, E. 1991. Conditions under which activity-based systems provide relevant costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research 3: 159-168. Noreen, E., and N. Soderstrom. 1994. Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity? Evidence from hospital service departments. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 255-278. Noreen, E., and N. S. Soderstrom. 1997. The accuracy of proportional cost models: Evidence from hospital service departments. Review of Accounting Studies 2 (1): 89-114. Scott, J. 1981. The probability of bankruptcy: A comparison of empirical predictions and theoretical models. Journal of Banking & Finance Vol. 5(3): 317~344. Serfling, M. A. 2013. Labor adjustment costs and capital structure decisions. Working Paper. Subramaniam, C., and M. Weidenmier. 2003. Additional evidence on the behavior of sticky costs. Working paper, Texas Christian University. Sweeney. 1994. Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 281-308. Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Weiss, D. 2010. Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 85: 1441-1474. Wiersma, E. 2010. The impact of the reward structure on stickiness. SSRN Working Paper Series. Yasukata, K., and T. Kajiwara. 2011. Are 'sticky costs' the result of deliberate decision of managers?. Working paper, Kinki University and Kobe University. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54581 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來國內外的實證研究發現,成本隨著作業水準增加的幅度大於其隨著作業水準降低的幅度,此現象即所謂「成本僵固性」。本篇論文旨在延伸國內外對於成本僵固性之研究,探討財務資源調整成本與成本僵固性之關聯。我們預期若公司的財務資源調整成本越高,則越能減輕該公司的成本僵固性,使成本的增減異動呈現較對稱的情況。違反債務條件的財務壓力底下,管理階層產生裁撤成本以支應本息的管理誘因,扭轉原先礙於產銷面資源調整成本而不立即裁撤的管理決策。
本研究採用台灣上市櫃公司1986至2013年之樣本,參考Dierynck et al. (2012)之研究建立迴歸模型,並根據財務危機相關論文加入財務資源調整成本之代理變數,實證結果指出,在營業費用、銷管費用、銷貨成本中皆有成本僵固性的存在,且財務資源調整成本皆能顯著減輕其僵固程度,另外,結合財務槓桿度與自由現金流量的財壓承載率,相較其他財務危機指標,更能反映財務資源調整成本與成本僵固性之關聯。 關鍵字:財務資源調整成本、成本僵固性、成本習性、違反債務條件、財務危機 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Recent research on cost behavior has discovered that costs do not change proportionately with changes in sales, costs increase in response to growth in sales is greater than costs decline in response to sales reduction, such costs behavior is named as “cost stickiness.” Our study extends prior research on sticky costs by examining the relation between financial resource adjustment costs and anti-stickiness, which is based on the hypothesis that managers would be more likely to diminish costs while facing the pressure of debt-covenant. Following prior financial distress literature, we develop an index combined financial leverage and free cash flows as a proxy of financial resource adjustment costs.
Using a sample of Taiwan listed firms from 1986 to 2013, we found that the phenomenon of cost stickiness truly exists, and our empirical research results provide strong evidence to convince that financial resource adjustment costs induce manage incentive which cause the costs less sticky. Key words: financial resource adjustment costs、leverage、cash flows、sticky、distress | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:05:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02722041-1.pdf: 596148 bytes, checksum: 54ee42c03e670db2ecc2d2c8c8952258 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目次 iv 表目錄 vi Chapter 1 緒論 - 1 - 1.1 研究背景 - 1 - 1.2 研究動機與目標 - 2 - 1.3 論文架構 - 5 - Chapter 2 文獻回顧與假說 - 7 - 2.1 成本僵固性 - 7 - 2.2 違反債務合約的財務壓力 - 10 - 2.3 假說 - 11 - Chapter 3 研究方法 - 13 - 3.1 樣本篩選 - 13 - 3.2 研究模型 - 14 - Chapter 4 實證結果與分析 - 18 - 4.1 敘述性統計 - 18 - 4.2 財務資源調整成本與成本僵固性之關聯性分析 - 21 - Chapter 5 敏感性分析 - 25 - 5.1 財壓承載率 - 25 - 5.2 財務資源調整成本的衡量 - 29 - 5.3 財務槓桿度為負之樣本 - 32 - 5.4 利息費用僵固性之迴歸分析 - 34 - Chapter 6 結論 - 36 - 6.1 研究結論 - 36 - 6.2 研究限制 - 38 - 6.3 研究建議 - 39 - 參考文獻 - 41 - | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 財務資源調整成本 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 財務危機 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 違反債務條件 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成本習性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成本僵固性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 財務資源調整成本 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 違反債務條件 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成本習性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 財務危機 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成本僵固性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | sticky | en |
| dc.subject | financial resource adjustment costs | en |
| dc.subject | leverage | en |
| dc.subject | cash flows | en |
| dc.subject | distress | en |
| dc.subject | financial resource adjustment costs | en |
| dc.subject | leverage | en |
| dc.subject | cash flows | en |
| dc.subject | sticky | en |
| dc.subject | distress | en |
| dc.title | 財務資源調整成本與成本僵固性之關聯性分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relation between Financial Resource Adjustment Costs and Cost Stickiness | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 高偉娟,戴怡蕙 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 財務資源調整成本,成本僵固性,成本習性,違反債務條件,財務危機, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | financial resource adjustment costs,leverage,cash flows,sticky,distress, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 46 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-06-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 582.18 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
