Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 土木工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54487
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor曾惠斌(H.P. Tserng)
dc.contributor.authorTzu-Chieh Linen
dc.contributor.author林子傑zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T02:59:50Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-20
dc.date.copyright2015-07-20
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-07-03
dc.identifier.citation1. Al-Momani, Ayman H. (2000). Construction delay: a quantitative analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 18(1), 51-59.
2. Alaghbari, Wa'el, Kadir, Mohd. Razali A., Salim, Azizah, & Ernawati. (2007). The significant factors causing delay of building construction projects in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(2), 15. doi: 10.1108/09699980710731308
3. Alzahrani, Jaman I, & Emsley, Margaret W. (2013). The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 313-322.
4. Assaf, Sadi A., & Al-Hejji, Sadiq. (2006). Causes of delay in large construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(4), 349-357.
5. Baldwin, John R, Manthei, James M, Rothbart, Harold, & Harris, Robert B. (1971). Causes of delay in the construction industry. Journal of the Construction Engrg. Division, 97(2), 177-187.
6. Bombardier_Transportation. (2014). INNOVIA Automated Transit Systems
7. Chan, Albert P.C., & Chan, Ada P.L. (2004). Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(2), 203-221. doi: doi:10.1108/14635770410532624
8. Chan, Daniel W. M., & Kumaraswamy, Mohan M. (1997). A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 55-63.
9. Chua, D. K. H., Kog, Y. C., & Loh, P. K. (1999). Critical Success Factors for Different Project Objectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(3), 142-150. doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:3(142)
10. EpiX_Analytics. (2015). Statistical descriptions of model outputs. Retrieved from: http://www.epixanalytics.com/modelassist/AtRisk/Model_Assist.htm#Presentng_results/Statistical_descriptions_of_model_outputs/Kurtosis_(K).htm
11. Kast, F.E., & Rosenzweig, J.E. (1974). Organization and management: a systems approach: McGraw-Hill.
12. Katzell, M.E. (1975). Productivity, the Measure and the Myth: AMACOM.
13. MBA智庫百科. (2013). 專案組合管理. Retrieved from: http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E9%A1%B9%E7%9B%AE%E7%BB%84%E5%90%88%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86
14. Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2010). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7 edition ed.): Pearson.
15. Odeh, Abdalla M., & Battaineh, Hussien T. (2002). Causes of construction delay: traditional contracts. International Journal of Project Management, 20(1), 67-73.
16. PMI. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK ® guide) (5 ed.): Project Management Institute.
17. Russell, J., Jaselskis, E., & Lawrence, S. (1997). Continuous Assessment of Project Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(1), 64-71. doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:1(64)
18. Salleh, Rohaniyati. (2009). Critical Success Factors of Project Management for Brunei Construction Projects: Improving Project Performance
19. Syed M. Ahmed, Salman Azhar, Pragnya Kappagantula, and Dharam Gollapudi. (2003). Delays in Construction: A Brief Study of the Florida Construction Industry. Paper presented at the ASC Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference, Clemson University - Clemson, South Carolina.
20. Tesoro, F., & Tootson, J. (2000). Implementing global performance measurement systems: a cookbook approach: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
21. Toor, Shamas-ur-Rehman, & Ogunlana, Stephen O. (2008). Critical COMs of success in large-scale construction projects: Evidence from Thailand construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 420-430.
22. University_of_SouthAlabama. (2014). Descriptive Statistics. Retrieved from www.southalabama.edu/coe/bset/johnson/lectures/lec15.htm.
23. Wikipedia. (2015). Earned value management. from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned_value_management#History
24. 大眾捷運法 (2014). 中華民國法規.
25. 公共工程施工品質管理作業要點 (2014). 中華民國法規.
26. 王毓仁. (2000). 公部門績效指標的設計與運用. 人力發展月刊(82).
27. 台灣世曦工程股份有限公司. (2015). 捷運三鶯線路線規劃及沿線周邊土地整體開發計畫綜合規劃. 研究報告
28. 吳明隆. (2007). SPSS操作與應用: 問卷統計分析實務: 五南出版社.
29. 吳慶芳. (2008). 專案成功度動態預測-應用演化式支持向量機推論模式(ESIM). 碩士論文, 臺灣科技大學.
30. 吳聰敏. (2007). 實獲值管理應用於營建工程專案成本管控之研究. 碩士論文, 臺灣大學.
31. 李正剛, 劉嘉哲, 吳仁哲, & 陳威仁. (2009). 臺北捷運內湖線土建工程特色簡介. 中華技術, No.81, 10.
32. 李宗憲. (2008). 實獲值管理在工程專案管理之應用改進研究. 碩士論文, 成功大學.
33. 周壽榮. (2012). 專案資料蒐集與管控模式之研究─ 以公共工程標案管理系統為例. 碩士論文, 臺灣大學.
34. 林信宏. (1998). 類神經網路在工程績效管理上之應用. 碩士論文, 臺灣大學.
35. 林蒼裕. (2006). 實獲值管理在工程專案管理之應用-以 A 機電工程公司工程專案為例. 碩士論文, 中央大學.
36. 邱文杰. (2002). 施工專案績效指標與機制之建立. 碩士論文, 成功大學.
37. 邱皓政. (2011). 量化研究與統計分析 (5 ed.). 五南出版社.
38. 政府採購法 (2011). 中華民國法規.
39. 政府採購法施行細則 (2012). 中華民國法規.
40. 翁
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54487-
dc.description.abstract營造產業一向以專案的型式進行,以期有最佳的執行效率,近年來國內營造產業界專案管理的知識持續進步,並應用於施工專案中,因此對施工專案執行效率方面的掌握程度逐漸提高,然而,國內營造廠決策層過去習於僅僅以專案營收成果作為專案成功與否的判別依據,較少關切專案的即時執行績效。近來工程專案的趨勢是:工程的複雜度遽增、公共工程專案規模愈來愈大、專案期間愈來愈長、統包型式的施工專案益加普遍,專案執行階段績效評估的重要性亦應予以重視,尤其當國內營造廠資本規模擴大,雄心勃勃地跨足海外營造市場時,同步管理多個、多地區施工專案時,組織內有限資源的適切調配投入顯得更加關鍵,由此,營造廠決策階層需要一個客觀、適用於其企業組織且能及時反應施工專案績效的指標進行管理,以期能對執行中的施工專案及時、適時掌控,在異常發生前及早應對和準備;也能在遭遇非預期況當下及時支援。
本研究針對施工專案績效為標的,蒐集國內外施工專案績效指標包括美國營建研究院(Construction Industry Institute,CII)發展的專案評估指標,CAPP(Continuous Assessment on Project Performance);社團法人國際專案管理學會(Project Management Institute,PMI)專案管理知識體指南PMBOK® Guide專案管理指標;實獲值管理(Earned value project/performance management,EVPM)指標;行政院公共工程委員會發展之公共工程標案管理系統之專案管理指標,共計209個指標為基礎,經問卷調查分析,歸納出3個適用於施工專案的重要績效指標類群,供國內營造廠商參考,並套用關鍵指標於中運量捷運工程施工專案實例,驗證績效指標的適用性,最後綜整歸納出執行中運量捷運工程專案時,業主、監造及施工三方面所應重視的要項,期望能對國內未來的中運量捷運建設有所貢獻。文中也對於指標應用範圍和後續研究建議,提出說明。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractConstruction industry usually conduct construction in project configuration. In these years, Taiwan construction industry has been cumulating project management knowledge and applies it on construction projects as an usual practice. Construction professionals become more capable to successfully handle and than complete construction projects with cumulating experience and project management knowledge. However, execution officers of construction enterprise are used to evaluate the success of project by merely taking a look at revenue report without concerning much about the real time performance assessment. As an unavoidable trend of construction projects, they become more complicated, larger contract amount, longer project period and more turnkey orientation. Thus, it shall put more attention on real time performance indicators of construction project not only due to the considerable cash flow involved, but also it’s the time for Taiwan construction companies to ambitiously outspread to overseas construction projects, as a result, multiple projects are conducted simultaneously yet separately in different regions on different time line. It becomes more essential to accurately arrange limited resource supporting multiple construction projects timely and appropriately. Execution officers of construction industry therefore need a set of few project performance indicator which is objective and tailored to own enterprise to monitor projects continuously during execution and provide timely support at the initiation of abnormal circumstances.
This research purposes to conclude and select 3 groups of real-time performance indicator for ease of construction project management to continuously monitor project performance out of 209 performance indicators composed of CAPP (Continuous Assessment on Project Performance) by CII, project management indicators by PMI (Project Management Institute), EVM (Earned value project/performance management) and project management indicators of Public Construction Management System by Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan. This research further verify the practicability of the proposed project performance indicators by applying these indicators to as built construction projects of medium capacity rapid transit system. Results show the practicability of the critical project performance proposed. It also concludes a comprehensive critical list for successful construction project in aspects of client, inspection and construction. Practical application of the conclusion to facilitate construction project of future medium capacity rapid transit system is the goal of this research. Practical application of these result aling with limitations and further research are described.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:59:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-P01521711-1.pdf: 6161151 bytes, checksum: cc08d6d8ee1aeba5deee3b75345b4597 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iv
目錄 vi
圖目錄 x
表目錄 xii
第1章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究範圍與限制 3
1.4 研究內容與流程 3
1.4.1 專案績效指標收集整理和指標彙整 5
1.4.2 專家訪談指標篩選和指標架構建立 5
1.4.3 問卷調查和結果統計分析 5
1.4.4 實例分析和結論與建議 6
第2章 文獻回顧 7
2.1 專案管理 7
2.2 專案組合管理 15
2.3 績效指標 16
2.4 專案成功指標 18
2.5 施工專案延誤指標 20
2.6 問卷調查與分析方法 26
2.7 捷運系統型式分析 30
2.8 小結 34
第3章 施工階段專案評估指標 36
3.1 CAPP專案評估指標 36
3.1.1 指標發展概述 37
3.1.2 CAPP專案評估指標76個 38
3.2 PMI專案管理指標 43
3.2.1 指標發展概述 44
3.2.2 PMBOK專案評估指標40個 45
3.3 EVM實獲值管理 47
3.3.1 指標發展概述 47
3.3.2 實獲值管理(EVM)13個指標 49
3.4 行政院公共工程委員會工程專案管理指標 51
3.4.1 指標發展概述 52
3.4.2 公共工程委員會專案管理指標80個 54
3.5 指標內容重新檢視 57
3.5.1 指標轉換 58
3.6 專家訪談 58
3.6.1 訪談過程紀要 60
3.6.2 指標語意修正和指標篩選 62
3.7 小結 69
第4章 問卷調查與分析 77
4.1 問卷分析流程 77
4.2 問卷設計與建立 78
4.3 調查樣本對象 79
4.4 統計分析流程 81
4.4.1 描述性統計 81
4.4.2 獨立樣本t檢定 89
4.4.3 顯著性總體分析結果 99
4.4.4 相關係數分析 103
4.5 小結 107
第5章 實例分析 108
5.1 分析流程 108
5.2 收集案例資料 108
5.3 案例資料數據標準化 109
5.4 關鍵指標應用分析 110
5.4.1 專案一 110
5.4.2 專案二 114
5.4.3 專案三 117
5.4.4 專案四 120
5.5 結果判讀和結論 123
第6章 結論與建議 125
6.1 結論 125
6.1.1 施工專案績效評估指標 125
6.1.2 實例分析延伸討論 126
6.2 後續研究建議 128
參考文獻 130
附錄一 正式問卷 135
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject施工專案管理zh_TW
dc.subject捷運工程zh_TW
dc.subject績效指標zh_TW
dc.subject施工專案管理zh_TW
dc.subject捷運工程zh_TW
dc.subject績效指標zh_TW
dc.subjectconstruction project managementen
dc.subjectmedium capacity rapid transit systemen
dc.subjectmedium capacity rapid transit systemen
dc.subjectproject performance indicatoren
dc.subjectconstruction project managementen
dc.subjectproject performance indicatoren
dc.title施工階段專案評估指標之研究-以中運量捷運工程為例zh_TW
dc.titleResearch on Continuous Project Performance Measurement for Construction Phase of Medium Capacity Rapid Transit Systemen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王人牧,林保宏,林威延
dc.subject.keyword捷運工程,績效指標,施工專案管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordmedium capacity rapid transit system,project performance indicator,construction project management,en
dc.relation.page144
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-07-06
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept土木工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:土木工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
6.02 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved