請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54426
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳聖賢(Sheng-Syan Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Tai-Yi Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林太乙 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:56:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-11 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abagail McWilliams and Donald Siegel. 2001. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A
Theory of the Firm Perspective.” The Academy of Management Review Vol. 26, No. 1 (Jan., 2001), pp. 117-127 Anginer, D., K, L. Fisher. and M, Statman. 2008. 'Stocks of Admired Companies and Despised Ones' Working Paper Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., & Hatfield, J. 1985. “An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability” Academy of Management Jour- nal, 28: 446-463. Barnett, M. & R. Salomon. 2002. “Unpacking Social Responsibility: The Curvilinear Relationship between Social Performance and Financial Performance“ Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management. Bradford Cornell and Alan C. Shapiro. 1987. “Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance” Financial Management Association Bragdon, J. H. , and J. T. Marlin. 1972. 'Is Pollution Profitable?' Risk Management 19 (2): 9-18 Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. 1975. “A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility” California Management Review, 1975, 18 (2), 49-58 Charles J. Fombrun, Naomi A. Gardberg and Michael L. Barnett, 2000, “Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk” Business and Society Review Volume 105, Issue 1, pages 85–106, Spring 2000 Cochran, P. L., and R. A. Wood. 1984. “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance” Academy of Management Journal, 27 (1): 42-56. Davis, Keith. 1960. 'Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?' California Management Review, Spring 1960 Daniel B. Turban and Daniel W. Greening. 1997. “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees” The Academy of Management Journal Vol. 40, No. 3 (Jun., 1997), pp. 658-672 Freeman, R. E. 1984. “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.” Boston: Pitman Publishing Gordon J. Alexander and Rogene A. Buchholz. 1978. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance” The Academy of Management Journal Vol. 21, No. 3 pp. 479-48612 Hamilton, S., H, Jo. and M, Statman. 1993. 'Doing Well While Doling Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds' Financial Analysts Journal, November, 1993, pp. 62-66. Henderson, D. 2002. “Misguided Virtue: False notions of Corporate Social Responsibility” Institute of Economic Affairs, London J Peloza. 2006. “Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance” California Management Review 48 (2), 52 James H. Davis, F. David Schoorman and Lex Donaldson. 1997. “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management” The Academy of Management Review Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 20-47 Jeff Anderson and Gary Smith. 2006. “A Great Company Can be a Great Investment” Financial Analysts Journal Vol. 62, No. 4 pp. 86-93 Jennings, P. and Zandbergen P. 1995. “Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach” Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015–52. Jones, T. 1995. “Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics” Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–37 Lee E. Preston and Douglas P. O'Bannon. 1997. “The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship” Business & Sciety Vol. 36 No. 4, December 1997 419-429 Leonardo Becchetti, Rocco Ciciretti and Iftekhar Hasan. 2007. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder's Value: An Event Study Analysis” Working Paper 2007-6 Michael E. Porter and Claas van der Linde. 1995. “Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate” Harvard Business Review, September-October 1995. Milton Friedman. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970 Moskowitz, M. 1972. “Choosing socially responsible stocks” Business and Society Review, 1: 71-75 Moussavi, F. and Evans, D. 1986. “An approach to measuring corporate social Performance” Presented at the Academy of Management meetings, San Diego. Parket, I. R. and. H, Eilbirt. 1975. 'Social Responsibility: The Underlying Factors' Business Horizons,18,1975,5-10 Peter Antunovich, David Laster, and Scott Mitnick. 2000. “Are High-Quality Firms Also High-Quality Investments?” Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Vol. 6, No. 1, January 2000 Shefrin, H. and M, Statman. 2003. 'Style of Investment Expectation' The Handbook of Equity and Style Management, Coggin & Fabozzi eds. New York: Wiley Solomon, R. C. and Hanson, K. R. 1985. “It's good business.” New York: Atheneum. Statman, M. 2000. 'Socially Responsible Mutual Funds' Financial Analysts Journal , 56, 2000, pp. 30-39. Thomas Donaldson and Lee E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications” The Academy of Management Review Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 65-91 Tsoutsoura Margarita. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance” University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper, March 2004. Ullmann, A. 1985. “Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance” Academy of Manage- ment Review, 10: 540-577. Vance, S. 1975. “Are socially responsible firms good investment risks?” Management Review, 64: 18-24. Waddock, S. A., and Samuel B. Graves. 1997. “The corporate social performance financial performance link” Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4): 303-319. Walley, N. and Whitehead B. 1994. “It’s not easy being green” Harvard Business Review 72 (3), 46-52 WB Werther, D Chandler. 2005. “Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility as Global Brand Insurance” Business Horizons 48 (4), 317-324 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54426 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本篇論文研究公司的企業社會責任決策,對整體社會福利的影響。論文中將企業道德品質納入考量,並且將CSR視為是企業傳遞自身道德品質的管道,透過一個資訊不對稱的賽局模型,來探討不同道德品質公司的策略行為,以及不同均衡結果下的社會福利大小。
透過此模型,我們可以發現,當好廠商以利潤極大化為目標做決策時,經常陷入無法達成均衡、或是雙方皆不進行CSR計畫的結果,此時的社會福利較其他可能均衡下為低。要改善這個狀況,政府可以進行CSR的補助計畫,來改變廠商的均衡條件,好廠商也可以改變決策函數,以CSR計畫的NPV作為決策衡量,透過這兩種方法,可以有效改善均衡結果,進而增加整體社會福利。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis studies the social welfare effect of corporation social responsibility policy. In this thesis, we put the corporations’ morality as a factor in our model, and we consider CSR as a conduit sending the message of its own morality type. We set up an information asymmetric game model, to investigate that what’s the CSR actions of different types of corporations, and to investigate the social welfares of different equilibriums.
In this model, we can discover that: when the goal of the good type corporation is maximizing profit, it often leads to a condition without equilibrium, or a condition that neither good nor bad type corporation do the CSR activity. In this condition, the social welfare is less than the other possible equilibriums. To improve this condition, the government can offer a CSR subsidy to change the equilibrium conditions, or the good type corporation can change its objective function, which means to make CSR decisions by the CSR project’s NPV. By these two method, we can improve the equilibrium, and therefore increase the social welfare. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:56:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01723044-1.pdf: 1405951 bytes, checksum: c99e59b06d5f0925c4c849be1d8a1e15 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
中文摘要 I Abstract II 目錄 IV 表目錄 V 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究動機 1 第二節、研究目的 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節、企業社會責任的定義與範疇 6 第二節、企業社會責任與公司表現之關聯性 8 第三章 模型設定 13 第四章 模型分析 21 第一節、目標函數為π 21 第二節、目標函數為NPV 25 第五章 數值分析 27 第一節、基本參數設定 27 第二節、Z的變動 34 第三節、b與g的變動 40 第六章 結論 45 第一節、研究結論 45 第二節、研究限制與建議 47 參考文獻 48 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 企業社會責任與社會福利之關係 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Welfare | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周冠男,張紹基 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 企業社會責任,社會福利,賽局,資訊不對稱, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | CSR,corporate social responsibility,social welfare,game theory,information asymmetry, | en |
dc.relation.page | 51 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。