Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54426
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳聖賢(Sheng-Syan Chen)
dc.contributor.authorTai-Yi Linen
dc.contributor.author林太乙zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T02:56:14Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-11
dc.date.copyright2015-08-11
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-07-08
dc.identifier.citationAbagail McWilliams and Donald Siegel. 2001. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A
Theory of the Firm Perspective.” The Academy of Management Review Vol. 26, No. 1 (Jan., 2001), pp. 117-127
Anginer, D., K, L. Fisher. and M, Statman. 2008. 'Stocks of Admired Companies and
Despised Ones' Working Paper
Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., & Hatfield, J. 1985. “An empirical examination of the
relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability” Academy of Management Jour- nal, 28: 446-463.
Barnett, M. & R. Salomon. 2002. “Unpacking Social Responsibility: The Curvilinear
Relationship between Social Performance and Financial Performance“ Best
Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management.
Bradford Cornell and Alan C. Shapiro. 1987. “Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate
Finance” Financial Management Association
Bragdon, J. H. , and J. T. Marlin. 1972. 'Is Pollution Profitable?' Risk Management
19 (2): 9-18
Bowman, E. H., & Haire, M. 1975. “A strategic posture toward corporate social
responsibility” California Management Review, 1975, 18 (2), 49-58
Charles J. Fombrun, Naomi A. Gardberg and Michael L. Barnett, 2000, “Opportunity
Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk”
Business and Society Review Volume 105, Issue 1, pages 85–106, Spring 2000
Cochran, P. L., and R. A. Wood. 1984. “Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance” Academy of Management Journal, 27 (1): 42-56.
Davis, Keith. 1960. 'Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?'
California Management Review, Spring 1960
Daniel B. Turban and Daniel W. Greening. 1997. “Corporate Social Performance and
Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees” The Academy of
Management Journal Vol. 40, No. 3 (Jun., 1997), pp. 658-672
Freeman, R. E. 1984. “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.” Boston:
Pitman Publishing
Gordon J. Alexander and Rogene A. Buchholz. 1978. “Corporate Social
Responsibility and Stock Market Performance” The Academy of Management
Journal Vol. 21, No. 3 pp. 479-48612
Hamilton, S., H, Jo. and M, Statman. 1993. 'Doing Well While Doling Good? The
Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds' Financial
Analysts Journal, November, 1993, pp. 62-66.
Henderson, D. 2002. “Misguided Virtue: False notions of Corporate Social
Responsibility” Institute of Economic Affairs, London
J Peloza. 2006. “Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial
performance” California Management Review 48 (2), 52
James H. Davis, F. David Schoorman and Lex Donaldson. 1997. “Toward a
Stewardship Theory of Management” The Academy of Management Review Vol.
22, No. 1, pp. 20-47
Jeff Anderson and Gary Smith. 2006. “A Great Company Can be a Great Investment”
Financial Analysts Journal Vol. 62, No. 4 pp. 86-93
Jennings, P. and Zandbergen P. 1995. “Ecologically sustainable organizations: an
institutional approach” Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015–52.
Jones, T. 1995. “Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics”
Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–37
Lee E. Preston and Douglas P. O'Bannon. 1997. “The Corporate Social-Financial
Performance Relationship” Business & Sciety Vol. 36 No. 4, December 1997
419-429
Leonardo Becchetti, Rocco Ciciretti and Iftekhar Hasan. 2007. “Corporate Social
Responsibility and Shareholder's Value: An Event Study Analysis” Working
Paper 2007-6
Michael E. Porter and Claas van der Linde. 1995. “Green and Competitive: Ending
the Stalemate” Harvard Business Review, September-October 1995.
Milton Friedman. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its
Profits” The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970
Moskowitz, M. 1972. “Choosing socially responsible stocks” Business and Society
Review, 1: 71-75
Moussavi, F. and Evans, D. 1986. “An approach to measuring corporate social
Performance” Presented at the Academy of Management meetings, San Diego.
Parket, I. R. and. H, Eilbirt. 1975. 'Social Responsibility: The Underlying Factors'
Business Horizons,18,1975,5-10
Peter Antunovich, David Laster, and Scott Mitnick. 2000. “Are High-Quality Firms
Also High-Quality Investments?” Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Vol.
6, No. 1, January 2000
Shefrin, H. and M, Statman. 2003. 'Style of Investment Expectation' The Handbook
of Equity and Style Management, Coggin & Fabozzi eds. New York: Wiley
Solomon, R. C. and Hanson, K. R. 1985. “It's good business.” New York: Atheneum.
Statman, M. 2000. 'Socially Responsible Mutual Funds' Financial Analysts Journal ,
56, 2000, pp. 30-39.
Thomas Donaldson and Lee E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the
Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications” The Academy of
Management Review Vol. 20, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 65-91
Tsoutsoura Margarita. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial
Performance” University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper, March 2004.
Ullmann, A. 1985. “Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the
relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic
performance” Academy of Manage- ment Review, 10: 540-577.
Vance, S. 1975. “Are socially responsible firms good investment risks?” Management
Review, 64: 18-24.
Waddock, S. A., and Samuel B. Graves. 1997. “The corporate social performance
financial performance link” Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4): 303-319.
Walley, N. and Whitehead B. 1994. “It’s not easy being green” Harvard Business
Review 72 (3), 46-52
WB Werther, D Chandler. 2005. “Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility as Global
Brand Insurance” Business Horizons 48 (4), 317-324
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54426-
dc.description.abstract本篇論文研究公司的企業社會責任決策,對整體社會福利的影響。論文中將企業道德品質納入考量,並且將CSR視為是企業傳遞自身道德品質的管道,透過一個資訊不對稱的賽局模型,來探討不同道德品質公司的策略行為,以及不同均衡結果下的社會福利大小。
透過此模型,我們可以發現,當好廠商以利潤極大化為目標做決策時,經常陷入無法達成均衡、或是雙方皆不進行CSR計畫的結果,此時的社會福利較其他可能均衡下為低。要改善這個狀況,政府可以進行CSR的補助計畫,來改變廠商的均衡條件,好廠商也可以改變決策函數,以CSR計畫的NPV作為決策衡量,透過這兩種方法,可以有效改善均衡結果,進而增加整體社會福利。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis studies the social welfare effect of corporation social responsibility policy. In this thesis, we put the corporations’ morality as a factor in our model, and we consider CSR as a conduit sending the message of its own morality type. We set up an information asymmetric game model, to investigate that what’s the CSR actions of different types of corporations, and to investigate the social welfares of different equilibriums.
In this model, we can discover that: when the goal of the good type corporation is maximizing profit, it often leads to a condition without equilibrium, or a condition that neither good nor bad type corporation do the CSR activity. In this condition, the social welfare is less than the other possible equilibriums. To improve this condition, the government can offer a CSR subsidy to change the equilibrium conditions, or the good type corporation can change its objective function, which means to make CSR decisions by the CSR project’s NPV. By these two method, we can improve the equilibrium, and therefore increase the social welfare.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:56:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-R01723044-1.pdf: 1405951 bytes, checksum: c99e59b06d5f0925c4c849be1d8a1e15 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
中文摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 IV
表目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節、研究動機 1
第二節、研究目的 4
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節、企業社會責任的定義與範疇 6
第二節、企業社會責任與公司表現之關聯性 8
第三章 模型設定 13
第四章 模型分析 21
第一節、目標函數為π 21
第二節、目標函數為NPV 25
第五章 數值分析 27
第一節、基本參數設定 27
第二節、Z的變動 34
第三節、b與g的變動 40
第六章 結論 45
第一節、研究結論 45
第二節、研究限制與建議 47
參考文獻 48
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject社會福利zh_TW
dc.subject企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject資訊不對稱zh_TW
dc.subject賽局zh_TW
dc.subject社會福利zh_TW
dc.subject資訊不對稱zh_TW
dc.subject賽局zh_TW
dc.subjectCSRen
dc.subjectinformation asymmetryen
dc.subjectgame theoryen
dc.subjectsocial welfareen
dc.subjectcorporate social responsibilityen
dc.subjectCSRen
dc.subjectinformation asymmetryen
dc.subjectgame theoryen
dc.subjectsocial welfareen
dc.subjectcorporate social responsibilityen
dc.title企業社會責任與社會福利之關係zh_TW
dc.titleThe Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Welfareen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee周冠男,張紹基
dc.subject.keyword企業社會責任,社會福利,賽局,資訊不對稱,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCSR,corporate social responsibility,social welfare,game theory,information asymmetry,en
dc.relation.page51
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-07-08
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:財務金融學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.37 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved