請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54344完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃光國(Kwang-Kuo Hwang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi Ding | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 丁一 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:51:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abramson, C. M. (2012). From “Either‐Or” to “When and How”: A Context‐Dependent Model of Culture in Action. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42(2), 155-180.
Alexander Jr, C. N., & Knight, G. W. (1971). Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. Sociometry, 65-82. Alexander Jr, C. N., & Lauderdale, P. (1977). Situated identities and social influence. Sociometry, 225-233. Alexander, C. N., & Rudd, J. (1981). Situated identities and response variables. Impression management theory and social psychological research, 83-103. Alexander, L., Appleton, D., Hall, R., Ross, W. M., & Wilkinson, R. (1980). Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clinical endocrinology,12(1), 71-79. Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Social psychology quarterly, 178-204. Bond, M. H., & Lee, P. (1978). Face saving in Chinese culture: A discussion and experimental study of Hong Kong students. Social Research Center, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Bond. M. H. (1996). The handbook of Chinese psychology. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press. Brabeck, M. (1984). Ethical characteristics of whistle blowers. Journal of Research in Personality,18(1), 41-53. Brody, R., Coulter, J. & Lin, S. (1999). The effect of national culture on whistle-blowing perceptions, Teaching Business Ethics, Vol. 3 No. 4, 385-400. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press. Cheng, C. Y. (1986). The concept of face and its Confucian roots. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 13, 329-348. Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 65-74. Chow, I. H. S., & Ng, I. (2004). The characteristics of Chinese personal ties (guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1075-1093. Chu, R. L. (1991). The threat to face and coping behavior. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China: Humanities and Social Science, 1 (1), 14-31. Cohen, E. (1974). Who is a tourist?: a conceptual clarification. The Sociological Review, 22(4), 527-555. Dozier, J. B., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective.Academy of Management Review,10(4), 823-836. Dworkin, T. M., & Baucus, M. S. (1995). Internal versus external whistleblowers: A comparison of the whistleblowing process. In meetings of the Academy of Management, Vancouver. Dworkin, T. M., & Callahan, E. S. (1991). Internal Whistleblowing: Protecting the Interests of the Employee, the Organization, and Society. American Business Law Journal, 29(2), 267-308. Earley, P. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of management journal, 36(2), 319-348. Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24(3), 265-304. Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9, 471-488. Fei, X. T. (1948). Rural china.Shanghai: Observer. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations: Communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, market pricing. Free Press. Fjneman, Y. A., Willemsen, M. E., Poortinga, Y. H., Erelcin, F. G., Georgas, J., Hui, C. H., ... & Malpass, R. S. (1996). Individualism-Collectivism An Empirical Study of a Conceptual Issue. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(4), 381-402. Glazer, M. (1983). Ten whistleblowers and how they fared. Hastings Center Report, 13(6), 33-41. Gong, T. (2000). Whistleblowing: what does it mean in China?. International journal of public administration, 23(11), 1899-1923. Gorta, A., & Forell, S. (1995). Layers of decision: Linking social definitions of corruption and willingness to take action. Crime, Law and Social Change,23(4), 315-343. Greenberger, D. B., Miceli, M. P., & Cohen, D. J. (1987). Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers.Journal of Business Ethics, 6(7), 527-542. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic management journal,19(4), 293-317. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 199-201. Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 107-123. Harris, P. L. (1989). Children and emotion: The development of psychological understanding. Basil Blackwell. Heine, S. J., & Ruby, M. B. (2010). Cultural psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(2), 254-266. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29-29. Ho, D. Y. (1991). Relational orientation and methodological relationalism.Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 26(27), 81-95. Ho, D. Y. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 1-16. Ho, D. Y. F. (1988). Asian psychology: A dialogue on indigenization and beyond. In A. C. Paranjpe, D. Y. F. Ho, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology (pp. 53–77). New York: Praeger. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage. Hofstede, G. (1997). Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 1991. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational dynamics, 16(4), 5-21. Huang, L. L. (1996). The harmony and conflict in Chinese social relationships: Theory and empirical analysis (in chinese). Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, National Taiwan University. Hwang, D. B. K. & Chen, Y. (2013). A comparative study of the propensity of whistle-blowing: empirical evidence from China, Taiwan, and the United States, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 3(2), 202-224. Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American journal of Sociology, 944-974. Hwang, K. K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 163-183. Hwang, K. K. (2011). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media. Hwang, K. K. (2011). The mandala model of self. Psychological Studies,56(4), 329-334. Jaffe, A. (1964). Symbolism in the visual arts. Jaffe, L. L. (1964). Primary Jurisdiction. Harvard Law Review, 1037-1070. Jarillo, J. C., & Ricart, J. E. (1987). Sustaining networks. Interfaces, 17(5), 82-91. Kedia, B. L., & Bhagat, R. S. (1988). Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 559-571. Keenan, J. P. (2002). Whistleblowing: A study of managerial differences.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 14(1), 17-32. Keenan, J. P. (2007). Comparing Chinese and American managers on whistleblowing. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 19(2), 85-94. Keil, M., Im, G. P., & Mahring, M. (2007). Reporting bad news on software projects: the effects of culturally constituted views of face‐saving.Information Systems Journal, 17(1), 59-87. King, A. Y. C. (1988). Face, shame and the analysis of Chinese behaviors. In K. S. Yang (Ed.), The Chinese psychology (in Chinese) (pp. 319-345). Taipei: Laureate Book Co. King, G. (1999). The implications of an organization's structure on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 315-326. Koller. J.M. (1985). Oriental Philosophies, New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers. Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University. Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (1991). Fostering ethical marketing decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 259-271. Lerner, M. J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations. In The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 11-35). Springer US. Lo, K. D. (2007). An empirical investigation of emic differences between American networking and Chinese guanxi and a process model of building relationships for cross-cultural busness interactions. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Science, 68, 2049. Lu, L., Cooper, C. L., Kao, S. F., & Zhou, Y. (2003). Work stress, control beliefs and well-being in Greater China: An exploration of sub-cultural differences between the PRC and Taiwan. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(6), 479-510. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 277-297. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1984). The relationships among beliefs, organizational position, and whistle-blowing status: A discriminant analysis.Academy of Management journal, 27(4), 687-705. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1985). Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle‐blowing decisions.Personnel Psychology, 38(3), 525-544. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1992). Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. Lexington Books. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2013). Whistle-blowing in organizations. Psychology Press. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1987). Whistle-blowers in organizations: Dissidents or reformers?. Research in organizational behavior. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin, 128(1), 3. Park, H., Rehg, M. T., & Lee, D. (2005). The influence of Confucian ethics and collectivism on whistleblowing intentions: A study of South Korean public employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4), 387-403. Ponemon, L. A., (1994). Comment: Whistle-Blowing as an Internal Control Mechanism: Individual and Organizational Considerations, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 13(2), 118–130. Popper, K.R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambrige, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Rothschild, J., & Miethe, T. D. (1999). Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation the battle to control information about organization corruption. Work and occupations, 26(1), 107-128. Sampson, E. E. (1985). The decentralization of identity: Toward a revised concept of personal and social order. American psychologist, 40(11), 1203. Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American psychologist, 43(1), 15. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Simon and Schuster. Sewell Jr, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 1-29. Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J. J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R. A., Markus, H. R., & Miller, P. J. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. Handbook of child psychology. Sims, R. L., & Keenan, J. P. (1999). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Managers' Whistleblowing Tendencies, International Journal of Value-Based Management, 12(2), 137-151. Tavakoli, A. A., Keenan, J. P., & Cranjak-Karanovic, B. (2003). Culture and whistleblowing an empirical study of Croatian and United States managers utilizing Hofstede's cultural dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 49-64. Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between Markets and. Strategic management journal, 7(1), 37-51. Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. L. (1997). Where Guanxi matters relational demography and Guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations,24(1), 56-7. Vaisey, S. (2010). What people want: Rethinking poverty, culture, and educational attainment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629(1), 75-101. Vandekerckhove, W. (2006). Whistleblowing and organizational social responsibility: A global assessment. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.. Vinten, G. (1992). Whistleblowing auditors—The ultimate betrayal?.International Journal of Value-Based Management, 5(1), 49-76. Vygotski, L. S. (1987). The Collected Works of LS Vygotsky. Wei-Ming, T. (1985). Confucian thought: Selfhood as creative transformation. SUNY Press. Zai, S. W. (1995). Chinese view of Lian and Mian (in Chinese). Taipei: Laureate Book Co. Zou, B. (1997). Chinese Lian and Mianzi (in Chinese). Wuhan: Huazhong Normal University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54344 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 大中華地區跨國企業的增加與商業醜聞的頻現使企業不正當行為揭發受到了越來越多的關注。先前研究通常表明揭發行為在具有集體主義傾向的社會中是不可接受的。為了對根植於儒家思想的中華文化有更準確的理解，我們用涵攝文化的關係主義和自我的曼陀羅模型來探討華人對揭發的態度。研究一發現華人對揭發的態度不僅有負面，也有正面；研究二以“與不正當行為人的親疏關係”與“受益的大我/自我”作為兩個具有文化特性的獨變項，設計了比較對內和向外揭發意向和判斷的情境問卷。結果顯示儒家社會中的華人自動化偏好以“仁愛”為動機的揭發行為；當與不正當行為人為工具性關係時，華人傾向於向組織以外的管道揭發；而與其情感性的聯結具有弱化向外揭發意向的影響。此外，當不正當行為的揭發對直系家人帶來益處，華人有較強的向外揭發的意向；反之，為了組織最終成就更好的大我，人們傾向於採取對內揭發不正當行為，直面在組織內部引起的問題並以之為自我修養的實踐。最後，我們建議將來採用企業高階職員的立足點，以及設計受試者真實參與的情境，來加深對於儒家社會中不正當行為揭發的理解。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Increasingly interests on whistleblowing behaviors have been aroused by emerging of international corporations and business scandals in Great China area. Previous studies about whistleblowing commonly suggested it an unacceptable behavior in propensity of collectivism approach. For a smattering understanding of Chinese culture grounded on Confucianism, we replace it with culture-inclusive theories of relationalism and Mandala Model of Self to investigate the attitude towards whistleblowing. Study Ⅰ we found either positive or negative attitude; study Ⅱ designed a scenario with “guanxi with the wrongdoer” and “big self/self to benefit” as two cultural specific independent variables to compare the intention and judgment on internal and external whistleblowing. Results indicated that people in Confucian society automatically prefer whistleblowing behavior motivated by “love for all”; people tend to blow a whistle outside of the organization compared to internal channel when they perceive an instrumental tie with the wrongdoer. They showed a lower intention of externalwhistleblowing when they have expressive connections. Furthermore, they may determine external whistleblowing intention when a whistleblowing behavior can bring goodness to the immediate family. However, they may turn to internal channel neglecting the incurred troubles as a self-cultivation practice for a better “greater self” ultimately. Limitation of this research and future implication for a non-ordinary standpoint of rank in organizations is suggested for deepen understanding whistleblowing in Confucian society. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:51:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01227123-1.pdf: 5353794 bytes, checksum: 2c344428df7a5702de95e1db0ce889b6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract ii
Table & Figure List vi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background & motivation 1 1.2 Whistleblowing 3 1.3 Internal & external whistleblowing in western studies 5 1.4 Decision-making process of whistleblowing 7 1.5 Confucian relationalism 9 1.6 Guanxi in Confucian society 11 1.7 Self & wisdom in a Mandala model 14 1.8 Morality & Face in Confucian society 18 1.9 Greater self in Confucian society 21 1.10 Boundary & duty in Confucian society 23 1.11 Internal & external whistleblowing in Confucian society 25 2 Hypothesis 28 2.1 Hypothesis 1 28 2.2 Hypothesis 2 30 2.2.1 Hypothesis 2.1 31 2.2.2 Hypothesis 2.2 32 2.3 Hypothesis 3 33 2.3.1 Hypothesis 3.1 35 2.3.2 Hypothesis 3.2 36 3 Research method 39 3.1 StudyⅠ 39 3.1.1 Method 39 3.1.2 Results and discussion 40 3.2 StudyⅡ 42 3.2.1 Method 42 3.2.2 Results 47 4 Discussion 57 4.1 Research findings 57 4.1.1 Disentangle the myth of whistleblowing in Confucian society 57 4.1.2 Sincerity in modern Confucian society 59 4.1.3 Harmony as a pervasive & superficial need in Confucian society 61 4.1.4 Obligation for the family in Confucian society 63 4.1.3 Sharing weal with the organization in Confucian society 64 4.2 limitations & future implications 66 4.2.1 Confucian ethics for ordinary people and scholars 66 4.2.2 The golden mean in the Confucian society 67 4.2.3 Intention for whistleblowing & behavior for whistleblowing 68 Reference 69 Appendix 74 Appendix 1 Questionnaire in Study Ⅰ 74 Appendix 2 Questionnaire in StudyⅡ 74 Appendix 3 Scenarios in Study Ⅱ 77 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 面子 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 儒家倫理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我的曼陀羅 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 儒家關係主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 揭發 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 面子 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 儒家倫理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我的曼陀羅 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 揭發 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 儒家關係主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | whistleblowing | en |
| dc.subject | Confucian relationalism | en |
| dc.subject | Mandala Model of Self | en |
| dc.subject | Confucian ethics | en |
| dc.subject | mientze | en |
| dc.subject | whistleblowing | en |
| dc.subject | Confucian relationalism | en |
| dc.subject | Mandala Model of Self | en |
| dc.subject | Confucian ethics | en |
| dc.subject | mientze | en |
| dc.title | 儒家社會中不正當行為的對內與向外揭發：關係與目的的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Internal vs. external whistleblowing in Confucian society: the influence of relationship and purpose | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王叢桂(Chung-Kwei Wang),吳宗祐(Tsung-Yu Wu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 揭發,儒家關係主義,自我的曼陀羅,儒家倫理,面子, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | whistleblowing,Confucian relationalism,Mandala Model of Self,Confucian ethics,mientze, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 80 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.23 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。