請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54253完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉光輝 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shih-Yi Jhuang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 莊詩怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:46:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
林昭溶、林惠雅（1999）。國中學生親子衝突的因應歷程。本土心理學研究， 12，47-101。 李美枝（1998），中國人親子關係的內涵與功能：以大學生為例。本土心理研 究，9，3-52。 胡肇勳、程景琳（2007），國小低年級孩童與父母在不同領域衝突的反應方式 之研究.。教育心理學報，38(4)， 481-499。 黃文三（1997）。近三十年我國青少年性別角色研究的回顧與分析。高雄師範 大學教育學系教育學刊，14，231-274。 黃春枝（1986），青少年親子關係適應與父母管教態度之研究，教育與心理研 究，9，83-96。 黃曼婷（2001）。家庭主婦志願工作者社會支持、婚姻滿意度、親子關係之研 究。國立政大學社會學系，台北。 邱珍琬（2005）。大學生知覺的父親形象。屏東師院學報，22，292-330。 帥文慧（1997）。母女關係的移動—以情節的書寫朝向改變。輔仁大學應用心 理研究所，未出版碩士論文，台北。 莊欣蓉（2006）。青春期學生父親形象知覺、父親依附關係及個人幸福感之相關 研究。屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導研究所，未出版之碩士論文，屏東市。 張苙雲（1986）。社會變遷中各類社會支持系統功能的討論。載於行政院研究 發展考核委員會，行政院研究發展考核委員會：「加強家庭教育 促進社 會和諧學術研討會論文集」，141-161。 陸洛（1998），中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討，國家科學委員 會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學。 陳春秀（2001），國小中高年級學童親子溝通、家庭氣氛與親子關係之研究， 國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所，未出版之碩士論文，嘉義。 陳富美（2005），親職效能感、教養行為與孩子生活適應之關係研究， 輔導與 諮商學報，27(1)， 47-63。 陳安琪（2003），以批判女性主義觀點探討中年父親父職角色實踐與父子關係 之跨世代影響，國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所，未出版之碩士論文， 高雄。 許明松（1997）。大學生依附關係與其生活適應之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔 導研究所，未出版之碩士論文，彰化。 許婷婷、林惠雅（2011），青少年知覺母親教養行為、母親依附與主觀幸福感 之相關研究，應用心理研究，52，149-179 。 葉光輝（1997），親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式：孝道觀點的探討。中 央研究院民族學研究所集刊，82，65-114。 楊中芳、彭泗清（1999）：〈中國人人際信任之構念化：一個人際關係的觀 點〉。《社會學研究》，2期， 1-21。 鄭慈蓉（2005）。父女互動經驗對女性親密關係的影響。臺灣師範大學，未出 版之碩士論文，臺北市。 Abrams, L.C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., Levin, D.Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17 (4), 64– 77. Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological wellbeing in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427-454. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 645-673. Carpenter, Barry. (2002). Inside the portrait of a family: The importance of fatherhood. Early Child Development and Care, 172(2), 195-202. Chua, Roy Y. J., Morris, Michael W., & Ingram, Paul. (2008). Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 490-508. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400422 Davis, M. H. (1983). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51, 167-184. Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. Yale University Press. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218- 226. Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Development, 56(2), 415-428. Hoffman, M. L.(1981).Is altruism part of human nature?.Journal of personality and social psychology,40,121-137. Hosley, C. A., & Montemayor, R. (1997). Fathers and adolescents. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (3rd ed., pp. 163–178). New York: Wiley. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 Johnson, D., & Grayson, K. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business research, 58(4), 500-507. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software. Kanawattanachai, P., Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11 (3-4), 187–213. Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., Mckay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H.,et al.(1999). Determining the level of reflective thinking from students’ written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow. International Journal of Lifelong Education,18(1), 18-30. Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P. With Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., Mckay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C. et al.(2000).Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,25(4),381-395. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985. McAllister, Daniel J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal , 38(1), 24-59. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization science, 14(1), 91-103. Ng, K. Y., & Chua, R. Y. (2006). Do I Contribute More When I Trust More? Differential Effects of Cognition‐and Affect‐Based Trust. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 43-66. Noller, Patricia, & Bagi, Stephen. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication. Journal of Adolescence, 8(2), 125-144. Paikoff, R. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1991). Do parent-child relationships change during puberty?. Psychological bulletin, 110(1), 47. Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. (2007). The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: moderating effects of cognitive-and affect-based trust in strategic decision-making teams. International Journal of Conflict Management,18(1), 42-73. Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. (2009). The interplay between cognitive-and affective conflict and cognition-and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 789-796. Parkhe, A. (1998). Building trust in international alliances. Journal of World Business, 33 (4), 417–437. Paul, D.L., McDaniel Jr., R.R. (2004). A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quarterly, 28 (2), 183– 227. Pollack, W. S. (1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House. Redding, S.G. (1993). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. Berlin: De Gruyter. Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(December), 651-665. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Shwalb, D. W., Nakazawa, J., Yamamoto, T. O. S. H. I. Y. A., & Hyun, J. (2004). Fathering in Japanese, Chinese, and Korean cultures. The role of the father in child development, 146-181. Sitkin, Sim B., & Roth, Nancy L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic 'remedies' for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4(3), 367-392. Smetana, J. G. (1989). Adolescents' and parents' reasoning about actual family conflict. Child development, 1052-1067. Smetana, J. G. and Asquith, P. (1994), Adolescents' and Parents' Conceptions of Parental Authority and Personal Autonomy. Child Development, 65: 1147–1162. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00809.x Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). Managing cognitive and affective trust in the conceptual R&D organization. Trust in knowledge management and systems in organizations, 82-106. Swift, P. E., & Hwang, A. (2013). The impact of affective and cognitive trust on knowledge sharing and organizational learning. The Learning Organization,20(1), 20-37. Truax, C. B.,Carkhuff, R. R.(1967).Unraveling the patient-therapist interaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology,10, 256-263. Vlaar, P. W., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). On the evolution of trust, distrust, and formal coordination and control in interorganizational relationships toward an integrative framework. Group & Organization Management, 32(4), 407-428. Webber, S. S. (2008). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams a longitudinal study. Small group research, 39(6), 746-769. Williams, M. (2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of management review, 26(3), 377-396. Wrightsman, L. S. (1992). Assumptions about human nature (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2009). Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 143-154. Yau, J., & Smetana, J. G. (1996). Adolescent‐Parent Conflict among Chinese Adolescents in Hong Kong. Child development, 67(3), 1262-1275. Yau, J., & Smetana, J. (2003). Adolescent-parent conflict in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: A comparison of youth in two cultural contexts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 201-211. Zucker, L.G. (1986). Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure. 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54253 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 既有文獻對親子信任是否為多向度的構念一直存有爭議，並常將親子信任視為親子關係品質的指標之一，較少探討親子信任在親子互動中扮演的功能。本研究企圖以兩個研究來區隔出親子認知與情感兩種信任，並進一步探究兩者對親子互動功能的差異。本研究主張應該針對因不同事件（如學業、交友、生活習慣等事件）發生意見不合的情境脈絡下討論信任，才可於親子互動脈絡中清楚地區隔出兩種信任類型。認知信任主要來自對父母能力的評價，而情感信任主要來自於過去與父母互動經驗所累積的情誼。研究一主要探討在何種情境下能區分親子認知與情感兩種信任；研究二則探討在區分出認知與情感信任的親子衝突情境下，青少年對父母親的認知與情感信任二者與對衝突的反思傾向及同理父母間的效果差異。研究一結果顯示：不論對象是父親或母親，在不同衝突事件下所發展的信任量表皆可清楚地獲得二因素結構，其內部一致性信度也皆良好；其中，認知信任強度會依情境與信任對象不同而有所不同，情感信任的強度則具跨情境的一致性，但會依信任對象不同強度有所差異。研究二以結構方程模型進行分析，結果顯示：青少年的認知信任與情感信任對同理父母與反思傾向皆具有正向的影響的效果，而且會受到互動對象與互動情境差異的影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Trust is a vital component of the relationship between parents and adolescents. In this research, researcher defined trust as two-dimensional concept. Cognition-based trust is composed of the competences of the interactive person. Affect-based trust is mainly composed of the past interactive experiences of the person. In the Chinese culture, the affections of children to parents usually influenced by parents’ capabilities. Therefore, two kinds of trust could not be separated clearly. This thesis proposes that adding situations’ cues can help people distinguish between cognition- and affect- based trust. Situations provide the cues for distinguishing cognition- and affect- based trust, like parents’ specific ability or familiarity of certain issue. In this research, there were two studies to test the hypotheses. Study 1 focused on distinguishing between cognition- and affect- based trust in parent-adolescent conflicts involving different issues. Study 2 explored the different functions of cognition- and affect- based trust on empathy to parents and reflective thinking about the conflict events. The results of factor analysis in Study1 showed the constructed questionnaire of parent-adolescent trust had two-factor structure in different conflict events on which parent and adolescent interact with each other. The strength of cognition-based trust depended on the events and parent whom adolescent trusts. The strength of affect-based trust was different between mother-adolescent and father-adolescent relationship, and was stable across events. The result of SEM in Study 2 showed that cognition- and affect- based trust, adolescent to parents, had positive relationships with empathy to parents and reflective thinking about the conflict events. The strength of relationships was different, which depended on the different conflict events and the interactive objects. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:46:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02227108-1.pdf: 1154300 bytes, checksum: 081d5dcd393711ab3499dc592b616f20 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節 人際信任 3 第二節 認知信任與情感信任之定義 5 第三節 華人親子脈絡中的認知信任與情感信任 5 第四節 情境脈絡中的「事件」與「對象」 7 4-1. 互動事件 7 4-2. 互動對象 8 第三章 研究一 11 第一節 研究一假設 11 第二節 研究方法 12 第三節 研究結果 13 第四節 小結與討論 19 第四章 研究二 22 第一節 親子信任之功能 22 1-1. 認知信任之功能與反思傾向之關係 23 1-2. 情感信任之功能與同理父母之關係 24 第二節 研究二假設 25 第三節 研究方法 26 3-1. 研究樣本 26 3-2. 研究設計 26 3-3. 測量工具 26 第四節 研究結果 29 第五節 小結與討論 35 第五章 總結 38 第一節 綜合討論 38 第二節 研究貢獻 40 第三節 研究限制與未來發展 41 參考文獻 44 附錄 51 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 親子衝突 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 親子關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情感信任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 認知信任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 認知信任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情感信任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 親子關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 親子衝突 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Parent- Adolescent Conflict | en |
| dc.subject | Parent- Adolescent Relationship | en |
| dc.subject | Affect-Based Trust | en |
| dc.subject | Cognition- Based Trust | en |
| dc.subject | Parent- Adolescent Relationship | en |
| dc.subject | Affect-Based Trust | en |
| dc.subject | Cognition- Based Trust | en |
| dc.subject | Parent- Adolescent Conflict | en |
| dc.title | 華人親子認知信任與情感信任之區辨及其功能 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Cognition- and Affect -Based Trust of the Chinese Parent-Adolescent Dyad: Distinctions and Functions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周玉慧,吳宗祐 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 認知信任,情感信任,親子關係,親子衝突, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Cognition- Based Trust,Affect-Based Trust,Parent- Adolescent Relationship,Parent- Adolescent Conflict, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 58 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。