Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54232
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃光國
dc.contributor.authorLi-Yu Liao 廖立宇en
dc.contributor.author廖立宇zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T02:45:53Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-11
dc.date.copyright2015-08-11
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-07-17
dc.identifier.citation何友暉、陳淑娟、趙志裕(1991)。關係取向:為中國社會心理方法論求答案。見楊國樞、黃光國(主編),中國人的心理與行為(1989),(49-66頁)。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。
吳經熊(1981)。內心悅樂之泉源。臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司。
林以正、張硯評(2012)。跨文化的重複驗證:形式或實質?。本土心理學研究,38,151-156。
黃光國(1988)。儒家思想與東亞現代化。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
黃光國(2009)。儒家關係主義:哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。臺北:心理出版社股份有限公司。
黃光國(2011a)。論「含攝文化的心理學」。本土心理學研究,36,79-110。
黃光國(2011b)。心理學的科學革命方案。臺北:心理出版社股份有限公司。
黃光國(2012)。由「渴望」到「行動」:論心理學的科學革命。本土心理學研究,38,131-149。
黃光國(2013)。社會科學的理路(第三版)。臺北:心理出版社。
費孝通(1947)。鄉土中國。上海:上海觀察社。
顏志龍(2012)。渴望心理學的科學革命:從「恐懼管理理論」的研究歷程反思心理學研究之現狀。本土心理學研究,38,103-129。
勞思光(2002)。新編中國哲學史。臺北:三民書局。
傅斯年(1951)。性命古訓辯證。臺北:國立臺灣大學。
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realism theory of science. London and New York: Verso.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Palo Alto, CA: Standford University Press.
Branden, N. (1969). The psychology of self-esteem. New York: Bantam Press.
Brooks, M. E., & Highhouse, S. (2006). Can good judgment be measured? In R. Ployhart & J. Weekley, (Eds.), Situational judgment tests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 155-195.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165-181.
Chiu, C. Y., Kim, Y. H., & Wan, W. N. (2008). Personality: Cross-cultural perspective. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Salofske (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment. London: Sage.
Clobert, M., Saroglou, V., Hwang, K. K., & Soong, W. L. (2014). East Asian religious tolerance - A myth or a reality? Empirical in investigations of religious prejudice in East Asian societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(10), 1515-1533.
Damarin, F., & Messick, S. (1965). Response styles as personality variables: A theoretical integration. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Feifel, H., & Branscomb, A. B. (1973). Who's afraid of death? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81, 282-288.
Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Hirschberger G. (2002). The anxiety-buffering function of close relationships: Evidence that relationship commitment acts as a terror management mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 527-542.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, J., Soloman, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1986). The cause and consequences of a need for self-esteem. A terror management theory. In R. F. Baunmeister (Ed.), Public self and private self. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308-318.
Greenberg, J., Soloman, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1992). Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one’s worldview? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 212–220.
Harmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & McGregor, H. (1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduces mortality salience effects. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 24-36.
Harre, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Harris, G. G. (1989). Concepts of individual, self, and person in description and analysis. American Anthropologist, 91(3), 599-612.
Heine, S. J., Harihara, M., & Niiya, Y. (2002). Terror management in Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 187-196.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010a). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010b). The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16.
Hoelter, J. W. and J. A. Hoelter (1978). The relationship between fear of death and anxiety. Journal of Psychology, 2(99), 225-226.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychological homeostasis and jen: Conceptual tools of advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23-44.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives. New York: Tavistock.
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 945-974.
Hwang, K. K. & Chang, J. (2009). Self-cultivation: Culturally sensitive psychotherapies in Confucian societies. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 1010-1032.
Hwang, K. K. (2011). The mandala model of self. Psychological Studies. 56(4), 329-334.
King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., & Abdelkhalik, J. (2009). Death, life, scarcity, and value: an alternative perspective on the meaning of death. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1459-1462.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lester, D. (1967). Experimental and correlational studies of the fear of death. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 1, 27-36.
Löckenhoff, C. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: The increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. Journal of Personality, 72, 1395-1424.
McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across non-cognitive measures. Journal of. Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821.
McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 979-1016.
McGregor, H. A., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L., & Pyszczynski, T. (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience promotes aggression against worldview threatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 590-605.
Meissner, W. (1958). Affective response to psychoanalytic death symbols. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 295-299.
Middleton, W. C. (1936). Some reactions toward death among college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 165-173.
Moore, C. C., & Williamson, J. B. (2003). The universal fear of death and the cultural response. In C. D. Bryant (Ed.), Handbook of death & dying. (pp. 3-13). London: Sage.
Nezlek, J. B., Sorrentino, R. M., Yasunaga, S., Otsubo, Y., Allen, M., Kouhara, S., et al. (2008). Cross-cultural differences in reactions to daily events as indicators
of cross-cultural differences in self-construction and affect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 685-702.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598-609.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: Viking Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shils, E. (1981). Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J., Hatano, G., Le Vine, R., Markus, H., & Miller, P. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1): Theoretical models of human development (pp. 865-937). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Tam, K. P., Chiu, C., & Lau, I. Y. (2007). Terror management among Chinese: Worldview defence and intergroup bias in resource allocation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 93-102.
Templer, D. I. (1970). The construction and validation of a Death Anxiety Scale. Journal of General Psychology, 82, 165-177.
Wakimoto, R. (2006). Mortality salience effects on modesty and relative self-effacement. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 176-183.
Whetzel, D. L., & McDaniel, M.A. (2009). Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 188-202.
Wong, P. T. P., Reker G. T., & Gesser, G. (1994). Death attitude profile-revised: A multidimensional measure of attitudes toward death. In R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Death Anxiety Handbook: Research, Instrumentation, and application.
(pp. 121-148). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Yen, C. L., & Cheng, C. P. (2010). Terror management among Taiwanese: Worldview defense or resigning to fate? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 185-194.
Yen, C. L. (2011). Terror management in Taiwan: A review of ten mortality salience experiments. In P. Singh, P. Bain, C. Misra, L. Hong, & Y. Ohtsubo (Eds.), Identity, multiculturalim and changing societies: Psychological, group and cultural processes. London: MacMillan.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54232-
dc.description.abstract恐懼管理理論認為:人類在面對死亡意念時,會啟動一系列心理防衛機制,包括將死亡想法壓抑至潛意識中,並藉由維護文化世界觀等方式提升和維持自尊,以抗衡對死亡事實無能為力的恐懼。不過,近來許多實徵研究與後設分析研究紛紛指出,在西方心理學占有一席之地的恐懼管理理論其實存有某些缺陷:雖然該理論在西方文化社會屢屢被印證,但卻經常無法符應非西方文化社會中的實際情形。為了探索問題所在,本研究使用普世性的自我與行動架構──「自我的曼陀羅模型」進行分析後發現,恐懼管理理論無法外推至非西方文化社會的原因在於其文化包容性的不足。有鑑於此,本研究繼續在自我的曼陀羅模型架構下,以華人文化為例,探討傳統儒、道、佛文化對死亡的理解,並將這些對文化脈絡的考量納入對創新理論的思考當中。經過理論層次的探討後,本研究選取華人社會的文化本源,亦是影響範圍和程度最為廣大的儒家文化進行實徵驗證。本研究的整體結果發現:儒家文化確實有著與西方文化相當不同的死亡恐懼心理因應內涵,例如儒家文化影響下的華人社會是直接在可知覺的意識層面(而非潛意識)對死亡進行思考,且以追求內在修養和圓滿人際關係(而非追求外顯個人價值和維護自尊)作為消解死亡恐懼的途徑。本研究希望藉由這些創新理論的思考及實徵研究的嘗試來修正和突破恐懼管理理論的限制,為往後建構能完整含攝文化的死亡因應心理學理論開啟可能性。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTerror management theory proposes that people often adopt defensive mechanisms, such as suppressing thoughts about death and protecting unique cultural worldviews unconsciously, to enhance self-esteem and overcome fear-of-death. Nonetheless, recent empirical studies and meta-analyses concluded that TMT cannot be verified and is not applicable in non-Western cultures, there are some limitations of TMT in predicting and explaining individuals’ fear-of-death in non-Western cultures. To solve this issue, this study put TMT in the Mandala Model of Self(an universal structure which describes human mind and action)and compared the cultural background of TMT with the Chinese traditions, then point out that there are such different ways facing to death in traditional Chinese society. For example, “thinking more about death in the consciously,” “making harmonious relationships between oneself and others, like family, mate, friends…” lead to the heightened cognitive accessibility of death and meaning of life in a Confucian society. 478 participants in Taiwan(represent the traditional Chinese Confucianism characteristics)were recruited for this study. The process of recalling near-death experiences was used to manipulate the participants’ feeling of mortality, then some following death-related situational judgment questions were asked in order to measure the participants’ concepts of coping strategies when faced the feeling of mortality. As predicted, results showed that the fear-of-death reducing process in Confucian society is different from that in Western cultures. People in a Confucian society usually think more about death in the conscious mind and dedicate their lives making harmonious relationships between themselves and others to reduce the fear-of-death. According to recent empirical studies and meta-analyses, TMT is no longer a universal theory as we once believed. As such, we need to take the issue of cultural tradition into consideration while conducting culture-inclusive fear-of-death studies. This study seeks to explain how cultural tradition impacts an individual’s concept of death and to generate new interests in culture-inclusive psychological theories on the topic of fear-of-death in the hope of finding better solutions.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:45:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-R01227110-1.pdf: 2904932 bytes, checksum: 247a6a6e8ccfe274cbe8132028620499 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 i
摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目次 vi
表目次 vi
圖目次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 2
第一節 恐懼管理理論 2
第二節 恐懼管理理論應用於華人文化的困境 3
第三節 含攝文化的普世性理論架構:自我的曼陀羅模型 6
第四節 西方文化的死亡理解:基督教傳統 8
第五節 華人文化的死亡理解:儒、道、佛 10
第六節 研究問題與假設 16
第三章 研究方法 18
第一節 研究對象 18
第二節 研究工具 18
第三節 研究程序 21
第四章 研究結果 23
第五章 討論與結語 31
參考文獻 34
表目次
表一、所有受測者在每個題目上的選擇分析 23
表二、陌生人死亡情境Q1的卡方分析 25
表三、陌生人死亡情境Q2的卡方分析 25
表四、熟識或親近的人死亡情境Q1的卡方分析 25
表五、熟識或親近的人死亡情境Q2的卡方分析 25
表六、自己死亡情境Q1的卡方分析 26
表七、自我死亡情境Q2的卡方分析 26
表八、受測者當下所重視的事物或價值觀分類整理 26
圖目次
圖一、自我的曼陀羅模型 7
圖二、自我的曼陀羅模型立體結構 8
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject自我的曼陀羅模型zh_TW
dc.subject死亡恐懼zh_TW
dc.subject恐懼管理理論zh_TW
dc.subject自我的曼陀羅模型zh_TW
dc.subject含攝文化的理論zh_TW
dc.subject文化脈絡zh_TW
dc.subject恐懼管理理論zh_TW
dc.subject儒家文化zh_TW
dc.subject儒家文化zh_TW
dc.subject文化脈絡zh_TW
dc.subject含攝文化的理論zh_TW
dc.subject死亡恐懼zh_TW
dc.subjectthe mandala model of selfen
dc.subjectterror management theoryen
dc.subjectmortalityen
dc.subjectculture-inclusive theoryen
dc.subjectcultural traditionen
dc.subjectConfucian societyen
dc.subjectterror management theoryen
dc.subjectmortalityen
dc.subjectthe mandala model of selfen
dc.subjectculture-inclusive theoryen
dc.subjectcultural traditionen
dc.subjectConfucian societyen
dc.title「防衛」或「修養」:文化取徑的死亡因應心理研究zh_TW
dc.title「Defense」or「Self-cultivation」:Cross-cultural Perspectives on Psychological Coping Strategies to Deathen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee夏允中,張滿玲,簡晉龍,越建東
dc.subject.keyword恐懼管理理論,死亡恐懼,自我的曼陀羅模型,含攝文化的理論,文化脈絡,儒家文化,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordterror management theory,mortality,the mandala model of self,culture-inclusive theory,cultural tradition,Confucian society,en
dc.relation.page40
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-07-20
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:心理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.84 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved