請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54017
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃從仁(Tsung-Ren Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yu Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林庭羽 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:36:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 陳心怡、陳榮華(2002):《 魏氏成人智力量表第三版 (中文版) 指導手冊》。台北:中國行為科學社。 Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, 8, 47–89. doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 Bailey, C. E. (2007). Cognitive accuracy and intelligent executive function in the brain and in business. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118, 122–141. doi:10.1196/annals.1412.011 Brady, T. F., Störmer, V. S., Alvarez, G. A. (2016). Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7459–7464. doi:10.1073/pnas.1520027113 Brod, G., Bunge, S. A., Shing, Y. L. (2017). Does one year of schooling improve children’s cognitive control and alter associated brain activation? Psychological Science, 28(7), 967–978. doi:10.1177/0956797617699838 Burle, B., Vidal, F., Tandonnet, C., Hasbroucq, T. (2004). Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 153–164. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.004 Carone, D. A., Strauss, E., Sherman E. M., Spreen, O. (2007). A compendium of neuropsychological tests : Administration, norms , and commentary. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(1), 62-63. doi:10.1080/09084280701280502 Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 1158–1170. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1191-6 Curtis, C. E. (2006). Prefrontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory. Neuroscience, 139(1), 173–180. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.070 D’Esposito, M., Postle, B. R., Rypma, B. (2000). Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: Evidence from event-related fMRI studies. Experimental Brain Research, 133(1), 3–11. doi:10.1007/s002210000395 De Jager, C., Blackwell, A. D., Budge, M. M., Sahakian, B. J. (2005). Predicting cognitive decline in healthy older adults. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13(8), 735–740. doi:10.1097/00019442-200508000-00014 Deary, I. J. (2000). Simple information processing and intelligence. Handbook of Intelligence, 267–284. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807947.014 Deary, I. J., Der, G. (2005). Reaction time explains IQ ’ s assocation with death. Psychological Science, 16(1), 64–69. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00781.x Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., Munro, S. (2007). The early years: Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318(5855), 1387–1388. doi:10.1126/science.1151148 Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 Durgin, F. H. (2000). The reverse Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7(1), 121–125. doi:10.3758/BF03210730 Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101–135. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101 Golden, C. J. (1978). Stroop color and word test: A manual for clinical and experimental uses. Chicago: Stoelting. Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Perception Psychophysics, 49(3), 227–229. doi:10.3758/BF03214307 Kane, M. J., Tuholski, S. W., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189 Kastner, S., Ungerleider, L. G. (2001). The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex. Neuropsychologia, 39(12), 1263–1276. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00116-6 Kray, J., Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15(1), 126–147. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126 Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., Fischer, J. S. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press. Li, C. (2013). Little’s test of missing completely at random. Stata Journal, 13(4), 795–809. doi:10.1177/1536867X1301300407 Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279–284. doi:10.1038/36846 Meier, M. E., Smeekens, B. A., Silvia, P. J., Kwapil, T. R., Kane, M. J. (2018). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(1), 68–84. doi:10.1037/xlm0000431 Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. doi:10.1177/0963721411429458 Monk, C. S., Zhuang, J., Curtis, W. J., Ofenloch, I. T., Tottenham, N., Nelson, C. A., Hu, X. (2002). Human hippocampal activation in the delayed matching- and nonmatching-to-sample memory tasks: An event-related functional MRI approach. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116(4), 716–721. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.116.4.716 Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception Psychophysics, 44(4), 369–378. doi:10.3758/BF03210419 Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception Psychophysics, 16(2), 283–290. doi:10.3758/BF03203943 Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 510-532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510. Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., Oberauer, K. (2018). Should we stop thinking about inhibition? searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 501–526. doi:10.1037/xlm0000450 Rogers, R. D., Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207 Rypma, B. (2006). Factors controlling neural activity during delayed-response task performance: Testing a memory organization hypothesis of prefrontal function. Neuroscience, 139(1), 223–235. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.062 Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., Robaey, P., Chen, S., Ickowicz, A., Barr, C. (2007). Restraint and cancellation: Multiple inhibition deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(2), 229–238. doi:10.1007/s10802-006-9075-2 Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262 Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 162–173. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.162 Stahl, C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., Nuszbaum, M., Tüscher, O., Lieb, K., Klauer, K. C. (2014). Behavioral components of impulsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 850–886. doi:10.1037/a0033981 Stein, M., Auerswald, M., Ebersbach, M. (2017). Relationships between motor and executive functions and the effect of an acute coordinative intervention on executive functions in kindergartners. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 859. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00859 von Bastian, C. C., Druey, M. D. (2017). Shifting between mental sets: An individual differences approach to commonalities and differences of task switching components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(9), 1266–1285. doi:10.1037/xge0000333 Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482. doi:10.1007/BF03395630 Zimmer, H. D. (2008). Visual and spatial working memory: From boxes to networks. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(8), 1373–1395. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.016 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54017 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 認知功能牽涉到我們的各方各面影響著我們的日常,如何測量精準測定特定認知功能,以及開發一套便利的成套認知功能測驗工具作為學術研究之工具是個非常重要的議題。目前市面上有一些認知測驗的工具,如:CANTAB;然而,這些認知測驗工具是需要付費並購買特定硬體裝置才能使用的。有鑑於此,在本研究開發了一套免費且便利的平板認知測驗工具—— Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment Battery (T-CAB),以期後續學者能夠更易於進行研究,更期待未來能夠拓展到診斷、認知訓練等用途。在 T-CAB 中,我們參考了不同的認知理論架構並考據其於行為以及神經方面之研究,現階段共完整開發了16個認知測驗,在處理速度、工作記憶、抑制功能以及轉換功能等四大面向下個有數個相關測驗。為探討 T-CAB 之有效性,本研究共分為兩個部分進行分析,第一部分為 T-CAB 內部各項測驗關係之初探,此部分招募了208位大學生受試者,做完整套 T-CAB。在相關分析中,我們發現選擇反應作業與抑制功能有關,且部分測驗有空間能力之涉入。此外,刺激特性對於工作記憶表現亦具有影響。而抑制功能、轉換功能內部之測驗彼此相關低,與過去文獻之結果雷同,說明了 T-CAB 這兩個功能上之各項測驗涵蓋較多元的選擇,建議後續研究者使用時依據自身需求做測驗選擇。第二部分為紙本版認知測驗與 T-CAB 之效度分析,在此我們招募了32位大學生受試者測量了紙本版叫色測驗以及魏氏智力測驗三中的順序背誦、逆序背誦、數-字序列、數字符號-替代測驗以及部分 T-CAB 測驗。相關分析結果顯示由於測驗特性的不同,紙本版測驗與平板認知測驗之間並無顯著相關,但僅就平板認知測驗內部之結果,仍符合第一部分所觀察到的現象。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Cognitive functions widely involve in our daily life. Therefore, how to assess specific cognitive functions accurately and develop a convenient and comprehensive cognitive functions assessment battery is a critical issue. There are some established tools, such as CANTAB. However, those tools are expensive, and users need to buy a specific device to use it. Due to the difficulty of accessing those tools, a free, comprehensive, and convenient tablet-based cognitive assessment tool, T-CAB, was developed in this research. We hope the researchers could benefit from T-CAB when conducting the researches, and we hope T-CAB could be used in the diagnosis and cognitive functions training in the future. In T-CAB, 16 different cognitive tasks were developed based on various well-known cognitive theory frameworks and neuroscience researches. T-CAB has four primary categories, processing speed, working memory, switching, and inhibition. There are several cognitive tasks under each category. In order to understand the validity of T-CAB, there are two sections in this research. In the first section, the goal is to understand the relationship between each task in T-CAB. We recruited 208 college students to finish all the tasks in T-CAB. In the correlation analysis, we found the performance of choice reaction time related to inhibition. Also, spatial ability involves in several tasks. Different types of stimuli influence the performance of working memory. Furthermore, align with the previous studies, the correlations within inhibition and switching are low. This finding indicates that T-CAB provides diverse tasks in terms of inhibition and switching functions. As a result, we would like to suggest the users choose the suitable task(s) for their goal. In the second section, we analyzed the correlation between the paper-based cognitive tasks and some tasks in T-CAB. We recruited 32 college students to finish the paper-based Stroop task, and Digit Span (forward and backward), Letter-Number Sequencing, Digit Symbol-Coding in WISC-III. Also, they finished some of the tasks in T-CAB. The result showed that there the correlations are not significant between paper-based cognitive tasks and tablet-based cognitive tasks. However, in terms of the within T-CAB, the results are similar to the results in the first sections. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:36:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0408202011403500.pdf: 4874822 bytes, checksum: de3a7368f80b43e3d3d4c60c13f60ba0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 認知評估的重要性 1 第二節 目前成套認知測驗 1 第三節 平板認知功能測驗工具 2 第二章 平板認知功能測驗工具開發 3 第一節 理論 3 第二節 平板認知功能測驗架構 5 第三節 平板認知功能測驗設計 6 第三章 驗證 23 第一節 平板認知測驗驗證分析 23 第四章 討論 34 第一節 平板測驗構念關係效度驗證 34 第二節 紙本版測驗與平板認知測驗之驗證 38 第五章 限制與未來方向 39 第一節 作業設計的差異 39 第二節 資料處理 39 第三節 常模建立 40 第四節 測驗種類完整性 40 參考文獻 42 附錄ㄧ 物體刺激 47 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 平板認知功能測驗工具:開發與驗證 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Tablet-Based Cognitive Assessment Battery (T-CAB): Development and Validation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉怡玉(Yei-Yu Yeh),郭郡羽(Chun-Yu Kuo) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 平板,認知測驗,處理速度,工作記憶,抑制功能,轉換功能, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Tablet,Cognitive Battery,processing speed,working memory,inhibition,switching, | en |
dc.relation.page | 48 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202002353 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0408202011403500.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.76 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。