請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/53979
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭伯壎 | |
dc.contributor.author | Jung-Hsuan Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林容璿 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:35:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 任金剛、樊景立、鄭伯壎、周麗芳(2003)。「高階主管之家長式領導與組織效能:一項個人與組織層次的分析」。教育部華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究報告(編號:89-H-FA01-2-4-4)。台北:教育部。
吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2002)。怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲:華人企業主管威權領導與部屬憤怒反應。「本土心理學研究」,18,3-49。 周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝(2014)。威權領導:概念源起、現況檢討及未來方向。「中華心理學刊」,56(2),165-189。 莊璦嘉、蘇弘文(2005)。主觀適配的特質環境前因與工作態度後果之探討。「人力資源管理學報」,5(1),1-27。 樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。「本土心理學研究」,13,127-180。 Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Allred, K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F., & Raia, C. P. (1997). The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(3), 175-187. Averill, J. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression. Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145-1160. Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 614-636. Baron, I. L., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Barger, P. B., & Grandey, A. A. (2006). Service with a smile and encounter satisfaction: Emotional contagion and appraisal mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1229-1238. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations: New York: Free Press. Bono, J. E., & Ilies, R. (2006). Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 317-334. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (Vol. 2, pp.389-444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713-715. Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884. Chi, N. W., & Ho, T. R. (2014). Understanding when leader negative emotional expression enhances follower performance: The moderating roles of follower personality traits and perceived leader power. Human Relations, 67(9), 1051-1072. Chiu, C., & Yang, C. F. (1987). Chinese subjects' dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 18, 39-50. Choi, M., & Yoo, T. (2005). The effects of person–organization, person–job, and person–supervisor fit on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intention: The focus on interaction effects among three types of fit. Korean Journal Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18, 139-162. Colbert A. E. (2004). Understanding the effects of transformational leadership: The mediating role of leader-follower value congruence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa. Connelly, S., & Ruark, G. (2010). Leadership style and activating potential moderators of the relationships among leader emotional displays and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 745-764. Damen, F., Van Knippenberg, B., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Affective Match in Leadership: Leader Emotional Displays, Follower Positive Affect, and Follower Performance1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(4), 868-902. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78. Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2002). Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader–member relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 615-634. Dawson, J., & Richter, A. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 917-926. Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192. Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735-744. Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384-392. Elfenbein, H. A., Polzer, J. T., & Ambady, N. (2007). Team emotion recognition accuracy and team performance. Research on Emotions in Organizations, 3, 87-119. Fischer, A. H., & Roseman, I. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: the characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 103-115. Forgays, D. G., Forgays, D. K., & Spielberger, C. D. (1997). Factor structure of the state-trait anger expression inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69(3), 497-507. Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The Emotions: Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Paris: Maison de Sciences de l'Homme. George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53(8), 1027-1055. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach, in J.G. Hunt & L.L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership Frontiers (pp.143-165), Ohio: Kent State University Press. Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. Graen, G. B., Wakabayashi, M., Graen, M. R., & Graen, M. G. (1990). International generalizability of American hypotheses about Japanese management progress: A strong inference investigation. Leadership Quarterly, 1(1), 1-24. Graves, L. M., Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., & Weber, T. J. (2012). Driven to work and enjoyment of work effects on managers’ outcomes. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1655-1680. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A. (2008). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35-59. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional Contagion. New York, NY: Cambridge University press. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage. James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229. Johnson, G., & Connelly, S. (2014). Negative emotions in informal feedback: The benefits of disappointment and drawbacks of anger. Human Relations, 67(10), 1265-1290. Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: a meta‐analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: 'Seizing' and 'freezing.'. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263-283. Lam, S. S., Schaubroeck, J., & Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: A cross-national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 1-18. Lewis, K. M. (2000). When leaders display emotion: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 221-234. Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72. Lindebaum, D., & Fielden, S. (2011). ‘It’s good to be angry’: Enacting anger in construction project management to achieve perceived leader effectiveness. Human Relations, 64(3), 437-458. Manstead, A. S., & Fischer, A. H. (2001). Social and cultural dimensions of appraisal. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research (pp. 221-232). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2005). Subordinate–manager gender combination and perceived leadership style influence on emotions, self-esteem and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 115-125. Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 424-432. Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1991). Value congruence and satisfaction with a leader: An examination of the role of interaction. Human Relations, 44(5), 481-495. Mignonac, K., & Herrbach, O. (2004). Linking work events, affective states, and attitudes: An empirical study of managers' emotions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(2), 221-240. Miron-Spektor, E., Efrat-Treister, D., Rafaeli, A., & Schwarz-Cohen, O. (2011). Others' anger makes people work harder not smarter: The effect of observing anger and sarcasm on creative and analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1065-1075. Miron-Spektor, E., & Rafaeli, A. (2009). The effects of anger in the workplace: When, where, and why observing anger enhances or hinders performance. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 28, 153-178. Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2000). How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 1-50. Newcombe, M. J., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2002). The role of affect and affective congruence in perceptions of leaders: An experimental study. Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 601-614. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142. Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1989). The expression of emotion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 1-42. Rusting, C. L., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models. Personality and Individual Differences, 22(5), 607-612. Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (2000). Affective states in job characteristics theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 131-146. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513-523. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594. Staw, B. W. (1975). Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(3), 414-432. Stock, W. A., Winston, K. S., Behrens, J. T., & Harper-Marinick, M. (1989). The effects of performance expectation and question difficulty on text study time, response certitude, and correct responding. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(6), 567-569. Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295-305. Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: the effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 86-94. Umstot, D. D., Bell, C. H., & Mitchell, T. R. (1976). Effects of job enrichment and task goals on satisfaction and productivity: Implications for job design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(4), 379-394. Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184-188. Van Kleef, G. A. (2014). Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it. Human Relations, 67(9), 1145-1164. Van Kleef, G. A., Anastasopoulou, C., & Nijstad, B. A. (2010). Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1042-1048. Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Manstead, A. S. (2004). The Interpersonal Effects of Anger and Happiness in Negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 57-76. Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010). On Angry Leaders and Agreeable Followers How Leaders’ Emotions and Followers’ Personalities Shape Motivation and Team Performance. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1827-1834. Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 562-580. Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Cheshin, A. (2012). Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(4), 311-339. Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., Van Der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1315-1322. Visser, V. A., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & Wisse, B. (2013). How leader displays of happiness and sadness influence follower performance: Emotional contagion and creative versus analytical performance. Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 172-188. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219-235. Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. Witt, L. (1998). Enhancing organizational goal congruence: A solution to organizational politics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 666-674. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/53979 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在實際組織中,主管的情緒展現對部屬具有重要的影響力,尤其是主管的憤怒情緒展現。過去研究大多認為主管憤怒情緒展現會減損部屬工作績效,然而部份研究卻發現主管憤怒情緒展現帶來的正向效果,顯示瞭解主管展現憤怒情緒當下之情境脈絡的重要性。本研究根據「情緒作為社會資訊模式」的觀點,探討主管績效期待與社會關係因子(主管─部屬交換關係品質與主管─部屬價值適配)、工作情境因子(工作豐富化)的共同作用下,主管憤怒情緒展現與部屬工作績效之間的關係。本研究採用問卷調查法,以階層線性模式分析286位全職工作者之樣本資料。結果顯示主管績效期待分別與交換關係品質、價值適配及工作豐富化的共同作用,會調節主管憤怒情緒展現與部屬工作績效之間的關係,即具有三階交互作用效果。進一步瞭解主管績效期待高、低狀況下的交互作用,發現在主管績效期待高的狀況下,交換關係品質、價值適配及工作豐富化可緩衝主管憤怒情緒展現對部屬工作績效的負向效果;在主管績效期待低的狀況下,交換關係品質、價值適配及工作豐富化反而強化主管憤怒情緒展現對部屬工作績效的負向效果。最後,針對研究發現進行結果討論,並對理論貢獻、實務意涵、研究限制及未來研究方向加以闡述。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Supervisors’ emotional expressions have a profound impact on subordinates’ performance, especially supervisors’ anger expressions. While some previous studies found that supervisor’s anger expressions may be detrimental to subordinates, others suggested that they could enhance subordinates’ performance. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the importance of understanding the contextual effect of supervisors’ anger expressions. To further explore this issue, the current study, based on EASI theory, investigates the relationship between supervisors’ anger expressions and subordinates’ job performance under the interaction effects of supervisors’ high performance expectations (HPE), social-relational factors (supervisor-subordinate exchange quality, LMX , and value fit, VFIT), and job related factors (job enrichment, JE). Survey data sampling from 286 subordinates were collected and analyzed using the hierarchical linear model. The results indicated that the interaction effects of HPE & LMX, HPE & VFIT, and HPE & JE respectively moderate the relationship between supervisors’ anger expressions and subordinates’ performance, which signifies a three-way interaction. Further analyses of interaction plots show that when HPE is high, LMX, VFIT, and JE buffer the negative effects of supervisors’ anger expressions on subordinates’ performance, while this effect is reversed when HPE is low. Finally, the contributions of the present findings and their implications, limitations, and future directions were discussed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:35:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02227103-1.pdf: 1045838 bytes, checksum: 0ea4065b0f8228f5e85479facb3fef8d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 情緒展現 5 第二節 主管憤怒情緒展現與部屬工作績效 12 第三節 主管憤怒情緒展現與部屬工作績效:主管績效期待與交換關係品質的共同調節作用 14 第四節 主管憤怒情緒展現與部屬工作績效:主管績效期待與價值適配的共同調節作用 18 第五節 主管憤怒情緒展現與部屬工作績效:主管績效期待與工作豐富化的共同調節作用 21 第六節 研究架構 26 第三章 研究方法 28 第一節 研究樣本 28 第二節 研究工具 30 第三節 研究程序 35 第四節 資料分析 36 第四章 研究結果 39 第一節 測量模式的比較 39 第二節 各研究變項之相關 42 第三節 三階交互作用之驗證 43 第五章 討論與建議 52 第一節 結果討論 52 第二節 研究貢獻 55 第三節 研究限制 58 第四節 未來研究方向 60 參考文獻 65 附錄一 部屬自評問卷 75 附錄二 主管他評問卷 79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 主管發怒有用嗎?主管績效期待、主管─部屬社會關係因子及工作豐富化的角色 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Is Supervisors' Anger Expression Useful? The Roles of High Performance Expectations, Social-Relational Factors, and Job Enrichment | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳宗祐,林姿葶,胡昌亞 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 情緒作為社會資訊模式,主管憤怒情緒展現,主管績效期待,主管─部屬交換關係品質,主管─部屬價值適配,工作豐富化,工作績效, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | EASI Model,supervisor’s anger expression,high performance expectations,supervisor-subordinate exchange quality,supervisor-subordinate value fit,job enrichment,job performance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 83 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。