Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物環境系統工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/53969
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林裕彬
dc.contributor.authorChun-Wei Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃浚瑋zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T02:35:02Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-28
dc.date.copyright2015-07-28
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-07-28
dc.identifier.citation1 Ball, I., Possingham, H., 2000. MARXAN (V1. 8.2), Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing, a Manual.
2 Bekessy, S.A., White, M., Gordon, A., Moilanen, A., Mccarthy, M.A., Wintle, B.A., 2012. Transparent planning for biodiversity and development in the urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning 108(2) 140-149.
3 Blair, R.B., 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6(2) 506-519.
4 Blair, R.B., 1999. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecological Applications 9(1) 164-170.
5 Brookes, C.J., 2001. A genetic algorithm for designing optimal patch configurations in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(6) 539-559.
6 Brudvig, L.A., 2011. The restoration of biodiversity: Where has research been and where does it need to go? American Journal of Botany 98(3) 549-558.
7 Crossman, N.D., Bryan, B.A., 2006. Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming. Biological Conservation 128(3) 369-383.
8 Dorning, M.A., Koch, J., Shoemaker, D.A., Meentemeyer, R.K., 2015. Simulating urbanization scenarios reveals tradeoffs between conservation planning strategies. Landscape and Urban Planning 136 28-39.
9 Freeman, E.A., Moisen, G., 2008. PresenceAbsence: An R package for presence absence analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 23(11) 1-31.
10 Gagné, S.A., Fahrig, L., 2010. The trade-off between housing density and sprawl area: minimising impacts to forest breeding birds. Basic and Applied Ecology 11(8) 723-733.
11 Garson, J., Aggarwal, A., Sarkar, S., 2002. Birds as surrogates for biodiversity: an analysis of a data set from southern Quebec. Journal of biosciences 27(4) 347-360.
12 Gordon, A., Simondson, D., White, M., Moilanen, A., Bekessy, S.A., 2009. Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 91(4) 183-194.
13 Graham, L.L., Page, S.E., 2012. Artificial bird perches for the regeneration of degraded tropical peat swamp forest: a restoration tool with limited potential. Restoration Ecology 20(5) 631-637.
14 Grainger, M.J., van Aarde, R.J., Wassenaar, T.D., 2011. Landscape composition influences the restoration of subtropical coastal dune forest. Restoration Ecology 19(101) 111-120.
15 Haenke, S., Kovács‐Hostyánszki, A., Fründ, J., Batáry, P., Jauker, B., Tscharntke, T., Holzschuh, A., 2014. Landscape configuration of crops and hedgerows drives local syrphid fly abundance. Journal of Applied Ecology 51(2) 505-513.
16 Hanna, K.S., Webber, S.M., Slocombe, D.S., 2007. Integrated ecological and regional planning in a rapid-growth setting. Environmental management 40(3) 339-348.
17 Hess, G.R., Bartel, R.A., Leidner, A.K., Rosenfeld, K.M., Rubino, M.J., Snider, S.B., Ricketts, T.H., 2006. Effectiveness of biodiversity indicators varies with extent, grain, and region. Biological Conservation 132(4) 448-457.
18 Hirsch, P.D., Adams, W.M., Brosius, J.P., Zia, A., Bariola, N., Dammert, J.L., 2011. Acknowledging conservation trade‐offs and embracing complexity. Conservation Biology 25(2) 259-264.
19 Hof, J.G., Bevers, M., 1998. Spatial optimization for managed ecosystems. Columbia University Press.
20 Holzkämper, A., Lausch, A., Seppelt, R., 2006. Optimizing landscape configuration to enhance habitat suitability for species with contrasting habitat requirements. ecological modelling 198(3) 277-292.
21 Holzkämper, A., Seppelt, R., 2007. Evaluating cost-effectiveness of conservation management actions in an agricultural landscape on a regional scale. Biological Conservation 136(1) 117-127.
22 Horikawa, M., Tsuyama, I., Matsui, T., Kominami, Y., Tanaka, N., 2009. Assessing the potential impacts of climate change on the alpine habitat suitability of Japanese stone pine (Pinus pumila). Landscape ecology 24(1) 115-128.
23 Huang, C.-W., Lin, Y.-P., Ding, T.-S., Anthony, J., 2014. Developing a Cell-Based Spatial Optimization Model for Land-Use Patterns Planning. Sustainability 6(12) 9139-9158.
24 Huber, P.R., Thorne, J.H., Roth, N.E., McCoy, M.M., 2011. Assessing ecological condition, vulnerability, and restorability of a conservation network under alternative urban growth policies. Natural Areas Journal 31(3) 234-245.
25 Jantz, C.A., Goetz, S.J., 2005. Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land‐use‐change model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19(2) 217-241.
26 Ko, C.-J., Fan, M.-W., Jiang, Y.-X., Yo, W.-J., Lo, Y.-Y., Huang, K.-W., Lin, R.-S., Lin, S.-C., Lee, P.-F., 2014. 2013 Taiwan breeding bird survey annual report. Council of Agriculture, Endemic Species Research Institute: Nantou, Taiwan.
27 Kok, K., Farrow, A., Veldkamp, A., Verburg, P.H., 2001. A method and application of multi-scale validation in spatial land use models. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 85(1) 223-238.
28 Larsen, F.W., Bladt, J., Balmford, A., Rahbek, C., 2012. Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness? Journal of Applied Ecology 49(2) 349-356.
29 Lethbridge, M.R., Westphal, M.I., Possingham, H.P., Harper, M.L., Souter, N.J., Anderson, N., 2010. Optimal restoration of altered habitats. Environmental Modelling & Software 25(6) 737-746.
30 Ligmann‐Zielinska, A., Church, R.L., Jankowski, P., 2008. Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land‐use allocation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 22(6) 601-622.
31 Lin, C.-W., Hsu, F.-H., Ding, T.-S., 2011. Applying a Territory Mapping Method to Census the Breeding Bird Community Composition in a Montane Forest of Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science. 26(3) 267-285.
32 Lin, Y.-P., Huang, C.-W., Ding, T.-S., Wang, Y.-C., Hsiao, W.-T., Crossman, N.D., Lengyel, S., Lin, W.-C., Schmeller, D.S., 2014. Conservation planning to zone protected areas under optimal landscape management for bird conservation. Environmental Modelling & Software 60 121-133.
33 Lin, Y.-P., Verburg, P.H., Chang, C.-R., Chen, H.-Y., Chen, M.-H., 2009. Developing and comparing optimal and empirical land-use models for the development of an urbanized watershed forest in Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning 92(3) 242-254.
34 Lindenmayer, D., Knight, E., Crane, M., Montague-Drake, R., Michael, D., MacGregor, C., 2010. What makes an effective restoration planting for woodland birds? Biological Conservation 143(2) 289-301.
35 Liu, Y., Tang, W., He, J., Liu, Y., Ai, T., Liu, D., 2015. A land-use spatial optimization model based on genetic optimization and game theory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 49 1-14.
36 Loman, J., 2003. Small habitat islands are inferior breeding habitats but are used by some great tits–competition or ignorance? Biodiversity & Conservation 12(7) 1467-1479.
37 Loman, J., Schantz, T., 1991. Birds in a farmland—more species in small than in large habitat island. Conservation Biology 5(2) 176-188.
38 Margules, C.R., Pressey, R.L., 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405(6783) 243-253.
39 Mateo Sánchez, M.C., Cushman, S.A., Saura, S., 2013. Scale dependence in habitat selection: the case of the endangered brown bear (Ursus arctos) in the Cantabrian Range (NW Spain). International Journal of Geographical Information Science(ahead-of-print) 1-16.
40 McDonald, R.I., Kareiva, P., Forman, R.T., 2008. The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 141(6) 1695-1703.
41 McShane, T.O., Hirsch, P.D., Trung, T.C., Songorwa, A.N., Kinzig, A., Monteferri, B., Mutekanga, D., Thang, H.V., Dammert, J.L., Pulgar-Vidal, M., 2011. Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation 144(3) 966-972.
42 Meentemeyer, R.K., Tang, W., Dorning, M.A., Vogler, J.B., Cunniffe, N.J., Shoemaker, D.A., 2013. FUTURES: multilevel simulations of emerging urban–rural landscape structure using a stochastic patch-growing algorithm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(4) 785-807.
43 Moilanen, A., 2007. Landscape zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: unifying reserve selection strategies. Biological Conservation 134(4) 571-579.
44 Moilanen, A., Possingham, H.P., Polasky, S., 2009. A mathematical classification of conservation prioritization problems, In: Moilanen, A., Wilson, K.A., Possingham, H.P. (Eds.), Spatial conservation prioritization. Quantitative methods & Computational tools. Oxford University Press: United Kingdom, pp. 28-42.
45 Murray, A.T., Tong, D., Grubesic, T.H., 2012. Spatial optimization: expanding emergency services to address regional growth and development. Studies in Applied Geography and Spatial Analysis: Addressing Real World Issues 109.
46 Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K.M., Daily, G.C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1) 4-11.
47 Noss, R., Nielsen, S., Vance-Borland, K., 2009. Prioritizing ecosystems, species, and sites for restoration. Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools, Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK 158-171.
48 Palik, B.J., Goebel, P.C., Kirkman, L.K., West, L., 2000. Using landscape hierarchies to guide restoration of disturbed ecosystems. Ecological Applications 10(1) 189-202.
49 Pauchard, A., Aguayo, M., Peña, E., Urrutia, R., 2006. Multiple effects of urbanization on the biodiversity of developing countries: the case of a fast-growing metropolitan area (Concepción, Chile). Biological Conservation 127(3) 272-281.
50 Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P., Liu, C., 2004. Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land‐cover data. Ecography 27(3) 285-298.
51 Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Camm, J., Csuti, B., Fackler, P., Lonsdorf, E., Montgomery, C., White, D., Arthur, J., Garber-Yonts, B., 2008. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biological Conservation 141(6) 1505-1524.
52 Razgour, O., Hanmer, J., Jones, G., 2011. Using multi-scale modelling to predict habitat suitability for species of conservation concern: the grey long-eared bat as a case study. Biological Conservation 144(12) 2922-2930.
53 Reid, J.L., Mendenhall, C.D., Rosales, J.A., Zahawi, R.A., Holl, K.D., 2014. Landscape Context Mediates Avian Habitat Choice in Tropical Forest Restoration. PloS one 9(3) e90573.
54 Šímová, P., Gdulová, K., 2012. Landscape indices behavior: a review of scale effects. Applied Geography 34 385-394.
55 Seppelt, R., Lautenbach, S., Volk, M., 2013. Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5(5) 458-463.
56 Seppelt, R., Voinov, A., 2002. Optimization methodology for land use patterns using spatially explicit landscape models. ecological modelling 151(2) 125-142.
57 Stagoll, K., Manning, A.D., Knight, E., Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D.B., 2010. Using bird–habitat relationships to inform urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 98(1) 13-25.
58 Stewart, T.J., Janssen, R., van Herwijnen, M., 2004. A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning. Computers & Operations Research 31(14) 2293-2313.
59 Stimson, R., Bell, M., Corcoran, J., Pullar, D., 2012. Using a large scale urban model to test planning scenarios in the Brisbane‐South East Queensland region*. Regional Science Policy & Practice 4(4) 373-392.
60 Svoray, T., Bannet, T., 2005. Urban land-use allocation in a Mediterranean ecotone: Habitat Heterogeneity Model incorporated in a GIS using a multi-criteria mechanism. Landscape and Urban Planning 72(4) 337-351.
61 Thapa, R.B., Murayama, Y., 2012. Scenario based urban growth allocation in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Landscape and Urban Planning 105(1) 140-148.
62 Tolson, B.A., Shoemaker, C.A., 2007. Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration. Water Resources Research 43(1).
63 Tscharntke, T., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Kruess, A., Thies, C., 2002. CONTRIBUTION OF SMALL HABITAT FRAGMENTS TO CONSERVATION OF INSECT COMMUNITIES OF GRASSLAND-CROPLAND LANDSCAPES*. Ecological Applications 12(2) 354-363.
64 Turner, M.G., O'Neill, R.V., Gardner, R.H., Milne, B.T., 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape ecology 3(3-4) 153-162.
65 Villard, M.A., Metzger, J.P., 2014. REVIEW: Beyond the fragmentation debate: a conceptual model to predict when habitat configuration really matters. Journal of Applied Ecology 51(2) 309-318.
66 Wagner, H.H., Fortin, M.-J., 2005. Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology 86(8) 1975-1987.
67 Wang, S.-H., Huang, S.-L., Budd, W.W., 2012. Integrated ecosystem model for simulating land use allocation. ecological modelling 227 46-55.
68 Westphal, M.I., Field, S.A., Possingham, H.P., 2007. Optimizing landscape configuration: a case study of woodland birds in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 81(1) 56-66.
69 Westphal, M.I., Pickett, M., Getz, W.M., Possingham, H.P., 2003. The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations. Ecological Applications 13(2) 543-555.
70 Wiens, J.A., 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional ecology 3(4) 385-397.
71 Wortley, L., Hero, J.M., Howes, M., 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21(5) 537-543.
72 Xiang, W.-N., 2013. Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: Awareness, acceptance, and adaptation. Landscape and Urban Planning 110(Complete) 1-4.
73 Zakaria, M., Rajpar, M.N., Moradi, H.V., Rosli, Z., 2014. Comparison of understorey bird species in relation to edge–interior gradient in an isolated tropical rainforest of Malaysia. Environment, development and sustainability 16(2) 375-392.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/53969-
dc.description.abstract隨著生態意識抬頭,生物保育常常成為受到關注的焦點。至2030年,都市擴張預計會造成全球1.8%生態熱點損失;另一方面,保育區的劃設則會限制都市發展。然而,過去所發展的土地利用分派模型卻少有同時考量都市發展與生物保育之土地使用分派方法。本研究發展一網格式空間優化模式,動態維度搜尋地景規劃最佳化模式(Dynamically Dimensioned Search Landscape Optimization Planning Model),立基於此模式下建立多目標規劃方法以分析考量都市發展與生物保育之土地利用規劃競合問題。透過競合分析結果,不同權重組合之土地利用管理方案可評估規劃單元之可復育性(Restorability)與開發壓力,並做為擬定區域分區計畫及地方尺度細部地景規劃設計之參考。運用此競合分析方法,本研究評估大台北-桃園之都市計畫區域,提出同時考量建物與台灣擬啄木(五色鳥)棲地適宜性之土地利用規劃方案,以評估規劃單元再分區做為保育之可能性及適合發展與保育共生之地景結構。研究結果顯示,部分農地因周遭的高度開發而無法透過地景結構規劃來進行棲地復育,其高都市發展適宜性與低棲地可復育性之特徵,可考量做為都市發展使用。另一方面,具有較高可復育性場址具有適合再分區為保育區之地景格局,透過大量的種植森林可使具生態考量之綠地可以深入都市區域。此外,為探討不同解析度對空間優化過程之影響,本研究更進一步比較解析度為網格與嵌塊體層級空間優化模式,結果顯示考量地景結構對物種適合度的影響,擁有較精細解析度的網格層級空間優化分析可提供較佳的土地利用規劃方案。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractUrbanization significantly drives land conversion and therefore may take up additional 1.8% of all biological hotspot areas by 2030. On the other hand, the establishment of protected areas for biological conservation often limits urban development. However, previous land use allocation models rarely take into account synergistic balance between urban development and biological conservation. This study develops a multi-objective spatial optimization model based on the cell-based Dynamically Dimensioned Search Landscape Optimization Planning Model for maximizing the consequential urban development suitability and habitat quality of resultant land-use patterns. As such, the trade-off between urban development and biological conservation can be revealed for assessing restorability and urbanization potential of planning areas in developing regional planning strategies. The model was applied to the Taipei-Taoyuan area for evaluating the conservation-development initiatives which maximize different weighted sums of suitabilities in accordance with the preferred landscape structures for buildings and the Taiwan Barbet. The results identified a number of cropland areas which had high urbanization potential and low habitat restorability for the target species, therefore these areas were suggested to be converted to urban land use. On the other hand, urban planning areas determined as a marginal habitat (i.e. high restorability) can be rezoned to fit the conservation needs as long as massive reforestation efforts were undertaken. The results showed that high restorability urban planning areas can be rezoned to fit the conservation needs. In doing so, green space can penetrate into the urban area from an ecological perspective. Furthermore, the study also revealed that spatial optimization at a cellular level can enhance habitat structures at a finer resolution compared to patch-level landscape optimization. The findings provide insights into the applications of optimal landscape patterns for not only regional rezoning but also built environment design.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:35:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-D99622006-1.pdf: 15443504 bytes, checksum: 5cba084a8fdcc5b849fe2da985b653aa (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書............................................................................................................I
誌謝...................................................................................................................................II
中文摘要.........................................................................................................................III
Abstract.............................................................................................................................V
Table of Contents...........................................................................................................VII
List of Tables....................................................................................................................X
List of Figures.................................................................................................................XI
I. Introduction..........................................................................................................1
1. Motivations and Objectives.................................................................................3
2. Chapter Description.............................................................................................4
II. Literature Review....................................................................................................7
1. Spatial Optimization Methods.............................................................................7
1.1 Definition of Spatial Optimization................................................................7
1.2 Applications of Spatial Optimization Method..............................................8
2. Scale Effects on Landscape Planning................................................................12
2.1 Definition of the Scale Effect......................................................................12
2.2 Scale Effects on Spatial Optimization.........................................................15
3. Integrating Wildlife Conservation into Urban Planning....................................19
III. Methods and Model Development........................................................................23
1. An Trade-off Analysis between Development and Conservation......................23
1.1 The Framework of Integrative Urban and Conservation Planning..............23
1.2 Categorization of the Ecological Restorability............................................26
2. A Multi-objective Spatial Optimization Model based on Dynamically Dimensioned Search Landscape Optimization Planning Model .......................31
2.1 The Concept of the DDSLOP Model...........................................................31
2.2 The Multi-objective Spatial Optimization Model........................................32
2.3 The Steps of the Multi-objective Spatial Optimization Model...................35
3. The Land-Use Pattern Optimization-Library (LUPOlib)..................................38
IV. Model Applications................................................................................................41
1. Regional Study Case - Trade-off Analysis between Urban Development and Conservation in Taipei-Taoyuan area................................................................41
1.1 Site Description and Data Collection...........................................................41
1.2 Site Evaluation - Zones with Different Restorability of Current Landscape....................................................................................................44
1.3 The Trade-off in Landscape Structure Management between Development and Conservation.........................................................................................47
1.4 Site Evaluation - Restorability before/after Optimal Landscape Structure Management.................................................................................................52
1.5 Landscape Structure Management - Strategies of Constructing Landscape Patterns for the Land-use Allocation Process..............................................54
1.6 Performance of Suitability Models..............................................................59
2. Local Case Study - Conservation Planning at National Taiwan University Experimental Farm...........................................................................................61
2.1 Site Description and Data Collection...........................................................61
2.2 Constraints and Parameters Settings..........................................................63
2.3 Performance of the DDSLOP and LUPOlib model.........................64
2.4 Landscape Patterns Optimized at a patch and cellular level........................65
2.5 Performance of Suitability Models............................................................69
V. Discussion.............................................................................................................71
1. A Trade-off Analysis for Integrative Urban and Conservation Planning..........71
2. Scale Effects on Landscape Planning Using Spatial Optimization Methods....72
3. Spatial Patterns Resulted from the DDSLOP Model.........................................73
4. Conservation Actions for Landscape Management Using the DDSLOP Model.................................................................................................................74
5. Evaluation of the DDSLOP Model....................................................................75
VI. Conclusion and Suggests....................................................................77
VII. References.............................................................................................................79
VIII. Appendix S1.......................................................................................................S1
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject空間優化模式zh_TW
dc.subject生物保育zh_TW
dc.subject土地利用分派模式zh_TW
dc.subject競合分析zh_TW
dc.subject尺度效應zh_TW
dc.subject棲地適宜性zh_TW
dc.subjectTrade-off analysisen
dc.subjectScale effect.en
dc.subjectHabitat suitabilityen
dc.subjectSpatial optimization modelen
dc.subjectBiological conservationen
dc.subjectLand-use allocation modelen
dc.title建立網格式空間優化模式於都市發展與生物保育之競合研究zh_TW
dc.titleDeveloping a Cell-based Spatial Optimization Model for Analyzing the Trade-off between Urban Development and Biological Conservationen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃書禮,張康聰,張良正,童慶斌,丁宗蘇
dc.subject.keyword競合分析,土地利用分派模式,生物保育,空間優化模式,棲地適宜性,尺度效應,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTrade-off analysis,Land-use allocation model,Biological conservation,Spatial optimization model,Habitat suitability,Scale effect.,en
dc.relation.page96
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-07-28
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept生物環境系統工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:生物環境系統工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
15.08 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved