跨出社會污名——愛滋病新聞的說服效果研究

Mi-Chi Chiu; 邱宓祺

請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件： http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52886

完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位	值	語言
dc.contributor.advisor	王泰俐(Tai-Li Wang)
dc.contributor.author	Mi-Chi Chiu	en
dc.contributor.author	邱宓祺	zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-15T16:32:23Z	-
dc.date.available	2021-02-22
dc.date.copyright	2021-02-22
dc.date.issued	2021
dc.date.submitted	2021-02-07
dc.identifier.citation	王保進（2006）。《英文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究》。臺北：心理。林芳玫（1996）。《女性與媒體再現》。臺北：巨流。林東泰（1999）。《大眾傳播理論》。臺北：師大書苑。吳明隆、涂金堂（2014）。《SPSS與統計應用分析》。臺北：五南。施美玲譯（1997）《大眾傳播研究方法》。臺北：五南。（原書Singletary, M. [1994]. Mass communication research: Contemporary methods and applications. New York: Longman.）徐美苓（2001）。《愛滋病與媒體》。臺北：巨流。翁秀琪（2016）。《大眾傳播理論與實證》。臺北：三民。陳凌（2004）。《說服傳播：過程和實踐》，臺北：五南。陳國明、彭文正、葉銀嬌、安然（2010）。《傳播研究方法》。臺北：威仕曼。張錦華（1994）。《媒介文化、意識型態與女性——理論與實例》。臺北：正中。張錦華（2010）。《傳播批判理論：從解構到主體》。臺北：黎明。榮泰生（2006）。《SPSS與研究方法》。臺北：五南。程巍譯（2012）。《疾病的隱喻》。臺北：麥田。（原書Sontag, S. [1978; 1989]. Illness as metaphor and AIDS and its metaphors. New York: Picador.）蔡幸佑、彭敏慧譯（1996）。《說服傳播》。臺北：五南。（原書Stiff ,J.B. [1993]. Persuasive Communication. New York: The Guilford Press.）羅世宏譯（2000）。《傳播理論－起源、方法與應用》。臺北：五南。（原書Severin, W.J. Tankard Jr., J.W. [1997]. Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media. New York: Longman）王泰俐（2011）。〈政府訊息置入電視新聞性節目的文本分析與閱聽人研究〉。《中華傳播學刊》，20：25-43。李惠宗（1999）。〈論新聞自由與隱私權的衝突——愛滋病學童案〉。《臺灣本土法學雜誌》，3：162-166。吳淑鶯、魏寶蓮、陳瑞和（2009）。〈超媒體電腦媒介環境下網路廣告效果之因果結構模式〉。《中華管理評論國際學報》，12（4）：1-31。林素真、翁淳宏（2008）。〈廣播廣告說服效果研究以推敲可能性模式分析〉。《中國廣告學刊》，13：59-75。周榮、周倩（1997）。〈網路上癮現象、網路使用行為與傳播快感經驜之相關性初探〉。《中華傳播學會1997年會學刊》，2-12，臺北市。徐美苓（1999）。〈愛滋病、媒體與民意：影響對愛滋病患權益與相關態度的因素探討〉。《民意研究季刊》，206：45-88。徐美苓（1998a）。〈愛滋病報導的議題與消息來源設定〉。《新聞學研究》， 58：171-199。徐美苓（1998b）。《健康宣導訊息設計對閥聽人接受度之研究：以愛滋病公益廣告為例》。（行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告，編號：NSC-87-2412-H-004-017），未出版。徐美苓、黃淑貞（1997）。〈愛滋病新聞報導內容之分析〉。《新聞學研究》，56：237-268。徐美苓、吳翠松、林文琪（2003）。〈愛滋陰影下的情慾規範：新聞論述中的他／她者建構〉。《臺灣社會研究季刊》，50：81-143。徐美苓、陳瑞芸、張皓傑、賴奕帆、林佳韻（2006）。〈愛滋新聞閱讀與對感染者與病患的態度：以針對年輕族群的訊息設計實驗為例〉。《新聞學研究》，87：1-49。陳宏梅、史曉寧（2010）。〈愛滋的污名烙印〉。《新臺北護理期刊》，12（2）：51-57。陳佳蓓（2001）。〈幽默廣告類別與廣告效果〉。「中華傳播學會2001年會」，未出版，臺北市。唐日新、葉耀仁（2011）。〈應用推敲可能性模型探討部落格行銷效果：以旅遊部落格為例〉。《中山管理評論》，19（3）：517-555。蔡琰、臧國仁（1999）。〈新聞敘事結構：再現故事的理論分析〉。《新聞學研究》，58：1-28。蔡宜蓁、呂佩珍、梁蕙芳（2013）。〈愛滋病污名之概念分析〉。《長庚護理》，24（3）：272-282。蔡承志、林禎舜、蔡麗瓊（2000），〈電子郵件調查穩定度的探討〉。《新世紀調查研究的課題──方法、對象與倫理，第三屆「調查研究方法與應用」學術研討會論文集》，51-55，臺北市。潘家鑫（2007）。〈網路健康資訊處理：價值涉入感與來源訊效果〉。「政治大學公企中心等主辦數位創世紀：數位傳播與文化行銷學術與實務國際研討會」，臺北市。尤昱婷（2001）。《新聞報導中的愛滋人權分析─權利與權力》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，臺北市。江宜珊（2005）。《電視新聞主播播報風格對觀眾接收新聞內容之影響》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文，臺北市。吳鳳雪（1994）。《解讀媒介中的同性戀意涵－以1983～1993年的報紙為例》。銘傳管理學院大眾傳播學系學士論文，臺北市。吳翠松（1998）。《報紙中的同志——十五年來同性戀議題報導的解析》。文化大學新聞學系碩士論文，臺北市。吳志怡（2002）。《女性政治人物媒體形象之建構以總統府緋聞案為例》。南華大學傳播管理學系碩士論文，嘉義縣。林文琪（1996）。《新聞論述建構之愛滋病語藝視野─以中國時報、聯合報為分析對象》。輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文，臺北縣。陳雅伶（2007）。《大學生性別角色刻板印象與同性戀態度之相關研究》。臺南大學諮商與輔導研究所碩士論文，臺南市。黃登榆（1997）。《網路色情現象初探：從閱聽人的角度談起》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，臺北市。蕭佳華（1996）。《疾病與烙印初探：兼論AIDS防治政策》。臺灣大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文，臺北市。顧玉珍（1991）。《解讀電視廣告中的女性意涵》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，臺北市。 Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London, UK: New Left Books. Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol.1), 3-56. Reading, Mass.: Addison‐Wesley. Atkin, C., Arkin, E. B. (1990). Issues and initiatives in communicating health information. In Atkin, C. Wallack, L. (Eds.), Mass communication and public health,13-40. London, UK: Sage. Bartlett, M. S. (1951). A further note on tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 4, 1-2. Boshier, R. (1992). Popular discourse concerning AIDS: its implications for adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 125-135. Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. Glencoe, Il: Free Press. Campbell, R. G., Babrow, A. S. (2004). The role of empathy in responses to persuasive risk communication: Overcoming resistance to HIV prevention messages. Health Communication, 16, 159-182. Cialdini, R. B., Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitude and attitude change. In Rosenzweig, M. Porter, L. (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol.32). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Crandall, S. C., Glor, J. (1997). AIDS-related stigmatization: Instrumental and symbolic attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 27(2), 95-123. Cuieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Harrison, K. (1999). The problem of ‘‘us’’ versus ‘‘them’’ and AIDS stigma. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(7), 1212-1228. D’Angelo, R. J., McGuire, J. M., Abbott, D. W., Sheridan, K. (1998). Homophobia and perceptions of people with AIDS. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(2), 157-170. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. Francis, A.M., Mialon, H.M. (2010). Tolerance and HIV. J Health Econ. 29(2), 250-267. Freud, S. (1953). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume VII (1901-1905): A case of hysteria, three essays on sexuality and other works,123-246. Gamson, W. A., Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37. Goffman, Erving, (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York, NY: Touchstone. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hays, J. N. (1998). The burdens of disease: Epidemic and human response in western history. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Herzlich, C Pierret, J (1987). Illness and self in society, trans. Elborg Forster. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Herek, G. Glunt E. (1988). An epidemic of stigma: Public reaction to AIDS. American Psychologist, 43, 886-891. Herek, G. M. (1988) Heterosexuals' attitudes towards lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451-477. Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(1), 19-22. Hovland, C., Jannis, I.L., Kelly, H.H. (1953), Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Johnson, D., Flora, J. A., Rimal, R. N. (1997). HIV/AIDS public service announcements around the world: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Health Communication, 2, 223-234. Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrica, 39,31-36. Keller, K. L., Staelin, R. (1987). Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 200–213. Lasswell, H. D. (1927). The theory of political propaganda. American Political Science Review, 21, 627-631. Lee, A. M. C., Lee, E. B. (1939). The fine art of propaganda: A study of Father Coughlin's speeches. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and Co. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York, NY: Macmillan. Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363-385. Lovell, T. (1980). The social relations of cultural production: Absent center of a new discourse. One-dimensional Marxism: Althusser and the politics of culture. London, UK: Allison and Busby. MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the Ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130-143. MacKenzie, S. B., Spreng, R. A. (1992). How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions? Journal of Consumer research, 18(4), 519-529. Madden, T. J., Allen, C. T., Twible, J. L. (1988). Attitude toward the ad: An assessment of diverse measurement indices under different processing “sets”. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(3), 242-252. McGuire, W. J. (1976). Some internal psychological factors influencing consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 302-319. McGuire W. J. (1984). Public communication as a strategy for inducing health-promoting behavioral change. Preventive Medicine, 13(3), 299-319. McGuire, W. J. (1989). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In Rice, R. E. Atkin, C. K. (Eds.), Public Communication Campaigns, 43- 65. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Murphy, E. J., Morgan, S.O. (1937). The dielectric properties of insulating material. The Bell System Technical Journal (Vol.16),4, 493-512. Miller, G. R. (1980). On being persuaded：Some basic distinctions. In Roloff, M. E. Miller, G. R. (Eds.), Persuasions: New directions in theory and research, 11-28. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Miniard, P. W., Bhatla, S., Lord, K. R., Dickson, P. R., Unnava, H. R. (1991). Picture-based persuasion processes and the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 92-107. Norris, C. E., Colman, A. M. (1992). Context Effects on Recall and Recognition of Magazine Advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 21, 37-46. Olson, J.M., Zanna, M.P. (1993). Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology ,44(1), 117-154. O’Keefe, D. J. (2016). Persuasion: Theory and research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Perloff, R. M. (1993). Communication textbook series. General communication theory and methodology. The dynamics of persuasion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D. (1993). Collective and individual representations of HIV/AIDS stigma (Eds.), The Social Psychology of HIV Infection, 263-286. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Issue Involvement as a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context. Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (U.S.), 8(1): 20-24. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer. Poiesz, T. B. C. Robben, H. S. J. (1996). Advertising effects under different combinations of motivation, capacity, and opportunity. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 231-236. Parker, R., Aggleton, P. (2003). HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: A conceptual framework and implications for action. Social Science and Medicine, 57(1), 13-24. Rogers, E. M., Dearing, J. W., Chang, S. (1991). AIDS in the 1980s: The agenda-setting process for a public issue. Columbia, SC: Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Rogers, E. M. (1994). The field of health communication today. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(2), 208-214. Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I. (1960). Attitude organization and change, 1-14. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Rozin, P., Markwith, M., Nemeroff, C. (1992). Magical Contagion Beliefs and Fear of AIDS. Journal of Applied Social Psychology (Vol.29), 531-551. Sabatier, R. (1988). Blaming others：Prejudice, race and worldwide AIDS. Washington, D.C.: New Society Publishers. Smith, M.A., Leigh, B. (1997). Virtual subjects: Using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, Computers,29, 496-505. Stiff, J., McCormack, M., Zook, E., Stein, T., Henry, R. (1990). Learning about AIDS and HIV transmission in college－age students. Communication Research, 17(6), 743-758. Stipp, H., Kerr, D. (1989). Determinants of public opinion about AIDS. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 98-106. Triplet, R. G., Sugarman, D. B. (1987). Reactions to AIDS victims: Ambiguity breeds contempt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 265-74. Wallack, L., Dorfman, L., Jernigan, D., Themba-Nixon, M. (1993). Media advocacy and public health: Power for prevention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Weaver, D (1977). Political issues and voter need for orientation. In D.L. Shaw and M.E. McCombs (Eds.), the Emergence of American Public Issues,107-120. Weiner, B. (1993a). AIDS from an attributional perspective. In Pryor, J. B. Reeder, G. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of HIV infection,287-302. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Weiner, B. (1993b). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957-965. Weiner, B., Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.
dc.identifier.uri	http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52886	-
dc.description.abstract	在醫療技術發達的現今，愛滋病已不再無藥可治，但長久以來的烙印讓民眾對愛滋病仍帶有恐懼，導致社會對愛滋病的誤解尚無法消除。若能透過大眾傳播媒體，以有效的說服方式讓民眾了解正確的愛滋病知識，或許有望改善整體社會對愛滋病的負面印象。本研究以「思辨可能性模式」為主要理論，透過訊息設計方式，設計兩則不同說服路徑的新聞，並觀察對同性戀持不同立場的民眾，是否會對不同說服路徑的愛滋病資訊，產生不同的說服效果。研究方法採用3（同性戀態度）× 2（新聞說服路徑）的多因子實驗設計，自網際網路招募90位受試者參與線上實驗，透過多變量變異數分析進行量化統計分析。研究結果顯示，中央路徑愛滋病新聞對挺同態度民眾具有較好的說服效果，而周邊路徑愛滋病新聞則對反同態度民眾具有較好的說服效果。此外，民眾對周邊路徑愛滋病新聞的認知程度較中央路徑愛滋病新聞高、男性對愛滋病資訊的接受程度則比女性高。在實務上，本研究認為新聞媒體應在符合新聞專業倫理的規範內，運用資訊性豐富且具吸引力的周邊線索，傳播更多中立、不受負面烙印的愛滋病防治觀念，以增加社會大眾接收愛滋病防治資訊的意願。	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract	Nowadays, by progressive medical technology, AIDS is no longer an incurable disease. But the long-standing HIV/AIDS-related stigma and the connection between homosexuality and the disease are still predominant in the society, and people’s misunderstanding of HIV/AIDS is still widespread. If mass media could be deployed to persuade the public to accept the correct knowledge of HIV/AIDS, it can be expected that the overall negative social impression of HIV/AIDS can be improved. This study used the Elaboration Likelihood Model as a theoretical framework by designing two HIV/AIDS news articles with different persuasion routes to examine whether they have persuasive effects on the recipients with different stances on homosexuality. To evaluate the expected effects, this study employed a 3×2 full factorial experimental design with two independent variables (attitudes toward homosexuality and routes to persuasion). A multivariate analysis of variance was performed to analyze data collected from 90 subjects recruited from the Internet to participate in the online experiment. The results of the study indicate that the HIV/AIDS news via the central route has a better persuasive effect on recipients with a favorable attitude toward homosexuality, while the HIV/AIDS news via the peripheral route has a better persuasive effect on those with an unfavorable attitude. In addition, the public’s perception of HIV/AIDS news is higher via the peripheral route than via the central route, and males’ acceptance of HIV/AIDS information is higher than that of females. For future studies and the journalism industry, this study suggests that within the norms of journalistic professional ethics, the news media should provide informative and attractive peripheral cues to spread more neutral and non-discriminatory messages on HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment to increase the public’s willingness to receive HIV/AIDS prevention information.	en
dc.description.provenance	Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:32:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0502202112293200.pdf: 3745069 bytes, checksum: 667a08f17fed3359c1c812101e09c83f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021	en
dc.description.tableofcontents	口試委員會審定書..........i 誌謝..........ii 中文摘要..........iii 英文摘要..........iv 圖目錄..........viii 表目錄..........viii 第一章緒論..........1 第一節研究動機..........1 第二節研究目的..........4 第三節研究程序..........5 第二章文獻探討..........6 第一節愛滋病的疾病污名化..........6 第二節媒體再現愛滋病議題..........12 第三節思辨可能性模式..........20 第四節小結..........29 第三章研究問題與研究架構..........31 第一節研究問題..........31 第二節研究架構..........32 第三節研究對象..........33 第四章研究方法與研究設計..........34 第一節線上實驗法..........34 第二節實驗設計與步驟..........36 第三節實驗與操作型定義..........38 第四節資料分析方法..........45 第五節前測..........47 第六節正式實驗..........52 第五章結論與未來建議..........70 第一節研究發現與解釋..........70 第二節實務檢討與建議..........74 第三節未來研究建議..........76 參考文獻..........78 附錄一：中央說服路徑新聞實驗文本..........91 附錄二：周邊說服路徑新聞實驗文本..........93 附錄三：正式問卷..........96
dc.language.iso	zh-TW
dc.title	跨出社會污名——愛滋病新聞的說服效果研究	zh_TW
dc.title	Overcoming Social Stigmas: Study on the Persuasive Effects of HIV/AIDS News	en
dc.type	Thesis
dc.date.schoolyear	109-1
dc.description.degree	碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee	林維國(Wei-Kuo Lin),何旭初(Hsu-Chu Ho)
dc.subject.keyword	說服效果,思辨可能性模式,同性戀態度,愛滋病,新聞,實驗法,	zh_TW
dc.subject.keyword	persuasive effect,Elaboration Likelihood Model,homosexual attitude,HIV/AIDS,news,experimental method,	en
dc.relation.page	103
dc.identifier.doi	10.6342/NTU202100575
dc.rights.note	有償授權
dc.date.accepted	2021-02-07
dc.contributor.author-college	社會科學院	zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept	新聞研究所	zh_TW
顯示於系所單位：	新聞研究所

文件中的檔案：

檔案	大小	格式
U0001-0502202112293200.pdf 目前未授權公開取用	3.66 MB	Adobe PDF

顯示文件簡單紀錄

系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。