請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52785
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳聖賢 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Chin Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 徐文瑾 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:27:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Adedeji, A., 1998, Does the pecking order hypothesis explain the dividend payout ratios of firms in the UK? Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 25(9&10), 1127−1155.
2. Aggarwal, R., & Kyaw, N. A. (2010). Capital structure, dividend policy, and multinationality: Theory versus empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 19, 140–150. 3. Alan A. Bevan & Jo Danbolt (2002) Capital structure and its determinants in the UK – a decompositional analysis, Applied Financial Economics, 12:3, 159-170 4. Brav, A., Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., Michaely, R., 2005. Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics 77, 483–527. 5. Chae, J., Kim, S., Lee, E.J., 2009. How corporate governance affects payout policy under agency problems and external financing constraints. Journal of Banking and Finance 33, 2093–2101. 6. De Angelo, H., De Angelo, L., Skinner, D.J., 2004. Are dividends disappearing? Dividend concentration and the consolidation of earnings. Journal of Financial Economics 72, 425–456. 7. Dittmar, A. K. 2000. Why do firms repurchase stock?. Journal of Business 73 (3):331-356. 8. Easterbrook, F.H., 1984. Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review 74, 650–659. 9. Fama, E.F., French, K.R., 2001. Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics 60, 3–43. 10. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French, 2002, Testing Trade-off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt, The Review of Financial Studies, 15(1): 1–33. 11. Grullon, G., Michaely, R., 2002. Dividends, share repurchases, and the substitution hypothesis. Journal of Finance 57, 1649–1684. 12. Jagannathan, M., C. P. Stephens, and M. S. Weisbach, (2000). “Financial flexibility and the choice between dividends and stock repurchases”, Journal of Financial Economics, 355-384 13. Miller, M.H., Rock, K., 1985. Dividend policy under asymmetric information. J. Financ. 40, 1031–1051. 14. Michaelas, N., F. Chittenden, and P. Poutziouris. 1999, Financial Policy and Capital Structure Choice in U.K. SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Company Panel Data. Small Business Economics, 12 (1999), 113–130. 15. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S., 1984, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187−221. 16. Oswald, D., and S. Young, 2008, Share reacquisitions, surplus cash, and agency problems, Journal of Banking and Finance 32, 795–806. 17. Renneboog, L. and Trojanowski, G. (2011) Patterns in payout policy and payout channel choice. Journal of Banking and Finance 35, 1477-1490. 18. Rozeff, M., 1982, Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios, Journal of Financial Research, 249-259. 19. Skinner, D., 2008. The evolving relation between earnings, dividends, and stock repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics 87, 582–609. 20. Van der Wijst, N. and R. Thurik, 1993, ‘Determinants of Small Firm Debt Ratios: An Analysis of Retail Panel Data’, Small Business Economics 5, 55–65. 21. 王象康,2005,「台灣上市公司現金股利與庫藏股政策之探討」,國立交通大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 22. 王瑪如、許雅婷、何怡滿,2011,「公司支付政策之趨勢、選擇與影響因素之研究」,國立屏東商業技術學院學報,第16期,309-333。 23. 王錦瑩、陳隆麒、劉玉珍,2006,「股票購回對股利政策變動宣告效果之影響」,管理評論,第25 卷第3 期,93-117。 24. 巫鈞聖,2013,「企業盈餘、負債與股利政策:生命週期觀點」,健行科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 25. 林至冠,2011,「股票購回對現金股利替代性之研究─以台灣上市公司為例」,國立政治大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 26. 吳佩芬,2006,「上市公司宣告買回庫藏股之宣告效果與買回動機研究」,國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。 27. 陳韻茹,2007,「台灣上市公司庫藏股及現金股利替代性之探討」,嶺東科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 28. 鄭世仁,2005,「股利初次發放之長期影響與負債和股權關聯之探討」,國立中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 29. 鄭桂蕙,2005,「庫藏股買回對股利發放之影響」,會計評論,第四十一期,頁 77-101。 30. 鄭硯霆,2007,「公司股利政策與現金增資次序之實證研究」,國立臺灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 31. 張舒婷,2006,「公司是否利用宣告現金股利以操縱股價」,國立台灣大學財務金融系碩士論文。 32. 蔡純真,2011,「探討資本結構、股利政策對公司價值之影響-訊號理論暨代理成本觀點」,逢甲大學會計研究所碩士論文。 33. 廖容岑,2004,「家族企業負債代理成本及股利政策之研究-以台灣上市公司為例」,私立淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 34. 劉玟,2007,「舉債後股利增發宣告之資訊內涵-由營運績效及內部人持股比率角度探討之」,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 35. 蕭樹芬,2009,「現金股利與庫藏股間的決策關係」,國立台灣大學財務金融系碩士論文。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52785 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究欲以支付政策的型態分析企業如何進行融資決策,利用Skinner(2008)的支付政策型態分析與Aggarwal & Kyaw(2010)的股利支付與資本結構聯立方程組模型,以台灣上市公司為研究標的,實證結果顯示企業的融資政策會因支付政策型態而異。
主要結論為:(1)負債比率與總和支付率呈現負相關,儘管與購回支付率呈現正相關,負向關係主要來自與股利支付率的顯著負相關,結果亦顯示股票購回屬於長期的財務決策。(2)支付率相對高低取決於股利支付,股利相對不穩定的企業即便有購回的輔助,支付率也不足以超越穩定股利支付的企業。此外,購回支付穩定的企業傾向選擇以長債來維持購回支付的穩定性,而購回支付不穩定的企業則傾向使用較具有彈性的短債融通暫時性的股票購回。(3)分析股利與購回皆使用下,結果顯示短債與整體支付穩定性為負向關係,而長債則與支付方式有關,且兩種支付方式交互使用下更需要彈性的資金做融通。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This paper targets to discuss how firms choose their financing policy from patterns of payout policy. By payout patterns analysis of Skinner (2008) as well as capital structure and dividend payout simultaneous equations of Aggarwal & Kyaw (2010), empirical evidences support the hypothesis that there are differences in financing policy between different patterns of payout policy.
Conclusions: (1) Debt ratio is negatively related to payout ratio mainly contributing to dividend payout with positive relationship of repurchase ratio. Empirical result also shows that share repurchase is long-term financial decision. (2) Level of payout ratio depends on dividend payout. Firms with unstable dividends use repurchase as complementary still have lower payout ratio than those with stable dividends. In addition, firms with stable repurchase tend to choose long-term debt to maintain stability of repurchase, while those with unstable repurchase tend to use more flexible short-term debt to finance it temporary needs of funds. (3) For the firm using both dividends and repurchases, empirical result shows short-term debt ratio is negatively related to overall stability of payout, while long-term debt is related to types of payout. To use both of dividend and repurchase, there is more demand to flexible funds. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:27:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02723043-1.pdf: 1643138 bytes, checksum: 4964c5bf67b57a84a819e0f20794657d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 1
中文摘要 2 英文摘要 3 第一章 緒論 7 1.1 研究動機 7 1.2 研究目的與問題 7 1.3研究範圍 8 1.4 研究流程 9 第二章 文獻回顧與假說建立 10 2.1 支付政策文獻 10 2.2 支付政策與融資政策關聯性文獻 11 2.3 建立假說 13 2.4 研究貢獻 13 第三章 研究方法 14 3.1 研究架構 14 3.2 研究變數與衡量 15 3.3 支付政策研究方法 17 3.4 支付政策與融資政策研究方法 17 第四章 資料分析結果 20 4.1 支付政策型態分析 20 4.2支付政策型態之融資政策差異性分析 20 4.3 支付政策與融資政策之相關性分析 22 第五章 結論與建議 26 5.1研究結論 26 5.2研究限制 27 5.3後續研究建議 27 參考文獻 71 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以盈餘支付政策分析企業融資工具之選擇 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Payout Policy Analysis in Financing Tools of Firm’s Choices | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周冠男,張紹基 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 現金股利,股票購回,支付政策,融資政策, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | cash dividends,share repurchase,payout policy,financing policy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 73 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.6 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。