請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52691
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許添本(Tien-Pen Hsu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hung Kuo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭于鴻 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:23:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 國內文獻:
[1] 王義川,號誌化交叉口分流式號誌設計方法之研究,國立臺灣大學土木工程所,碩士論文,1995年。 [2] 交通部,交通運輸研究所,臺灣地區公路容量手冊,79-27-160, 1991年5月。 [3] 交通部,交通運輸研究所,2001臺灣地區公路容量手冊,2001年6月。 [4] 交通部,內政部,「道路交通標誌線號誌設置規則」,2006年。 [5] 交通部,交通運輸研究所,改進亞太地區道路交通安全對策之調查研究, 92-42-3242-MOTC-IOT-S-A-89_006,2003年。 [6] 何志宏,獨立路口號誌時制分析與設計,92 年度交通工程人才培訓課程,2003年。 [7] 林貴璽,號誌設計與時制概論,國立交通大學運輸工程與管理系,交通工程學。 [8] 法務部,道路交通標誌標線號誌設置規則,2013年2月。 [9] 翁燕芬,獨立路口行人專用時相之研究,國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,2003年。 [10] 許添本,號誌化交叉口容量分析及應用之研究:臨界流動方法之發展,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文,1982年。 [11] 許添本,廿一世紀交通工程發展趨勢:回歸人本的交通工程,跨世紀的台灣土木:回顧與展望論述集,詹氏出版社,2000年。 [12] 許添本,建立法治交通制度-我國設計規範體系的建立,中華民國運輸學會運輸人通訊,第57期:交通主管機關應對行人專用時相設計規範進行規劃設計與管理維護,2006年。 [13] 許添本,交通工程學,基本交通工程,2013年。 [14] 許凱翔,考量自行車流特性路口號誌化最佳模式,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文,2014年。 [15] 符人懿,號誌化路口行人早開時相與控制策略之研究,淡江大學運輸管理學系運輸科學碩士班,碩士論文,2011年。 [16] 黃厚淳,設置行人專用時相對車輛與行人延滯影響之研究,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文,2004年。 [17] 詹善斌,號誌倒數計時器對駕駛行為影響之研究,國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系碩士,碩士論文,2003年。 [18] 溫日宏,新市鎮行人步道系統規劃與設計之研究-以高雄新市鎮綜合示範社區為例,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文,1995年。 [19] 劉信宏,混合車流等候結構之號誌分流最佳化模式. 臺灣大學土木工程學研究所,碩士論文,2013年。 [20] 陳俊堯,行人專用時相設置準則之研究,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文,2006年。 [21] 蔣靜宜,機車專用道飽和流率探討與模擬參數校估之應用,台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文,2003年。 [22] 蔡輝昇,交通控制理論與實務,生合成出版社,1990年 4 月。 [23] 顏上堯,混合車流狀況下市區號誌交叉口車流疏解特性及容量參數之研究,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文,1987年。 國外文獻: [24] Allsop, R. E. (1971). “Delay-minimizing settings for fixed-time traffic signals at a single road junction”, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 8(2), 164-185. [25] Allsop, R. E. (1972). “Estimating the traffic capacity of a signalized road junction”, Transportation Research, 6(3), 245-255. [26] Bechtel, A.K., MacLeod, K.E., Ragland, D.R. (2004). “Pedestrian scramble signal in chinatown neighborhood of Oakland, California: an evaluation”, Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1878, 19–26. [27] Cantarella, G. E., & Improta, G. (1988). “Capacity factor or cycle time optimization for signalized junctions: a graph theory approach”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 22(1), 1-23. [28] Clayton, A. J. H. (1941). “ROAD TRAFFIC CALCULATIONS”, Journal of the ICE, 16(7), 247-264. [29] Eunho Lee, Sunghoon Jang, Dong-Ik Ha, Chungwon Lee (2013). “A Pedestrian Speed Analysis at Signalized Crosswalk”, Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.9, 2013. [30] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2000). “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways”, Washington, D.C. [31] Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2009). “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2009 Edition”, Washington, D.C. [32] Gallivan, S., Heydecker, B. (1988). “Optimising the control performance of traffic signals at a single junction”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1988; 22(5):357–370. [33] HCM2000 (2000). “Highway Capacity Manual”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [34] HCM2010 (2010). “Highway Capacity Manual”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. [35] Heydecker B.G., Dudgeon I. W. (1987). “Calculation of Signal Settings to Minimise Delay at a Junction, Transportation and Traffic Theory, MIT”, Elsevier: New York. July 1987; 159–178. [36] Improta, G., & Cantarella, G. E. (1984). “Control system design for an individual signalized junction”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 18(2), 147-167. [37] John LaPlante, Thomas P. Kaeser (2007). “A History of Pedestrian Signal Walking Speed Assumptions”, 3rd Urban Street Symposium June 24-27, 2007 Seattle, Washington. [38] Kotkar Kishor Laxman, Rajat Rastogi and Satish Chandra (2010).” Pedestrian Flow Characteristics in Mixed Traffic Conditions”, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 136, No. 1, pp.23-33. [39] Miho Iryo-Asano, Wael K. M. Alhajyaseen (2014). “Analysis of Pedestrian Clearance Time at Signalized Crosswalks in Japan”, 5th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT-2014) [40] M. R. Virkler (1998). “Scramble and Crosswalk Signal Timing”, TRR1636, pp.83-87. [41] Pignataro, L.J. (1973). “Traffic Engineering Theory and Practice”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. [42] R. L. Knoblauch, M. T. Pietrucha, M. Nizburg (1996). “Fields studies of Pedestrian Walking Speed and Start-Up time”, TRR1538, pp.27-38 [43] R. L. Pretty (1979). ”The Delay to Vehicles and Pedestrian at Signalized Intersections”, ITE Journal pp.20~23,May 1979 [44] Tanaboriboon, Y., Hwa, S. S., Chor, C. H. (1986). “Pedestrian Characteristics Study in Singapore”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 112:229-235. [45] Tran Vu Tu and Kazushi Sano (2014). “Simulation Based Analysis of Scramble Crossings at Signalized Intersections”, International Journal of Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.1-14 [46] Virkler, M. R., Guell, D. L. (1984). “Pedestrian Crossing-Time Requirements at Intersections”, (No. HS-038 231). [47] Wanjing Ma, Yue Liu and K. Larry Head (2013). “Optimization of pedestrian phase patterns at signalized intersections: a multi-objective approach”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 48(8), 1138-1152. [48] Wanjing Ma, Dabin Liao,Yue Liu and Hong Kam Lo (2014).“Optimization of pedestrian phase patterns and signal timings for isolated intersection”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. [49] Webster, F. V. (1958). “Traffic signal settings” (No. 39). [50] Young-in Kwon, Shigeru Morichi, Tetsuo Yai (1997). “Analysis of Behaviors and Intersections of Pedestrians, Bicycles and Cars In Narrow Urban Streets”, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, Autumn, 1997 [51] Zegeer, C., Opiela, K.S., Cynecki, M.J. (1982). “Effect of pedestrian signals and signal timing on pedestrian accidents”, Transportation Research Board 847, 62–72. [52] Z. Yang and R. F. Benekohal (2011). “Pedestrian crossing phase optimization based on minimizing vehicle and pedestrian delays by genetic algorithm”, Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., January 22-26. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52691 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來「人本交通」之理念逐漸盛行,除強調提供人性化之運輸環境,而非過去以車為本體之交通設計方式,也須重視用路者之安全,像是提供一個對行人、自行車等慢行運具的友善交通環境,以達到路權平實。若路口之交通轉向量和行人量會有過多人車衝突,可利用號誌完全分離人車動線,以維持路口安全性,行人可利用獨立時相進行任何方向之穿越,此號誌控制策略即為行人專用時相。過去處理行人專用時相之設計上,為避免此控制策略對行車車輛影響太大,行人通行秒數時間是以行人最小穿越綠燈所計算,意即僅考慮原先就在路口處等候穿越的行人,並無考慮到行人流動和行人績效,更無達到路權平等之實。
因此,本研究在行人專用時相的環境下,進行行人流相關參數之蒐集與分析,使用複迴歸分析建立行人穿越時間關係式,確認行人啟動延滯秒數和行人緩衝區間等模式參數值,並將行人流參數納入路口號誌最佳化模式進行求解,以建立一套以車輛及行人之整體總延滯為目標函數之數學規劃模式。最佳化模式之設計原理採用群組基礎,將路口動線打散為車輛流動和行人流動,建立流動衝突矩陣,並導入流動時點和有效綠燈時間、損失時間之關係式後,分別進行兩種路型之模式求解流程,輸出結果為各流動起止時點、週期長度、行人平均延滯秒數和車輛平均延滯秒數。 本研究以正交路口進行共同開設左轉保護時相和行人專用時相之可能性評估,於幹道和支道交通量、行人量等情境設定下,以週期長度作為可行判斷之依據,建構出可行之交通量組合。最後結論,本研究以臺北市實施行人專用時相之兩種路型作為案例分析對象,將現行時制與本研究推導之時制計畫作績效比較與探討,結果顯示本研究模式之績效結果較原時制較佳。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | As humanity-oriented transportation becoming a main stream in recent years, instead of considering only motorized transport modes, it emphasizes on humanized transport environment. We shall attach importance on the safety of road users, including providing a friendly-used environment for pedestrian and bicycles in order to achieve equally right-of-way environment. If there are too many conflicts between turning vehicles and pedestrian, we could use signal control to separate entirely movements between vehicles and pedestrian to maintain the safety. As a consequence, pedestrian can cross the intersection in all directions with exclusive phase which means exclusive pedestrian phase.
To avoid the impact of exclusive pedestrian phase, pedestrian crossing time is calculated by minimum green time, which means it only allows pedestrians who stand on the sidewalks and wait for crossing without considering pedestrian flow and pedestrian performance, failing to achieve equally right-of-way as well. Our research collects and analyzes pedestrian flow data under intersections with exclusive pedestrian phase in order to establish pedestrian crossing time with multiple regression model, and estimate pedestrian start-delay value and buffer interval. Developing a signal timing optimization model which is based on minimizing vehicle and pedestrian delays is applied to exclusive pedestrian phase with considering the pedestrian flow that collected by field observation. The optimization model is adopted group-based method, breaking the phases into vehicular movements and pedestrian movement, building a conflict matrix of the junction, and considering the relationship among point of time, effective green time and lost time. Four-legged intersection and T intersection are designed and solved by the model. The outputs would be starting point and ending point of every movement, cycle length, average pedestrian delay and average vehicle delay. Our research also assesses the possibility of implementing both protected left-turn phasing and exclusive pedestrian phase under four-legged intersection. Based on the cycle length solved by optimization model, construct the feasible sets of traffic flow of major road and minor road. Finally, our research selects two types of intersections with exclusive pedestrian phase in Taipei City as case studies to compare and analyze the performance of signal timing between the original one and optimization model. Our research developed signal timing for optimization model with lower delay time for both vehicles and pedestrians, which performance is better than those of the previous signal timing plan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:23:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02521501-1.pdf: 7040353 bytes, checksum: 141f6cf486ba18b26d7e5083f2c3b082 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究範圍與限制 5 1.4 研究方法 5 1.5 研究流程 6 第二章 文獻回顧 8 2.1 行人特性 8 2.1.1 行人基本特性 8 2.1.2 行人步行速率 9 2.1.3 行人延滯 12 2.2 行人號誌及相關設置 15 2.2.1 行人號誌設計 16 2.2.2 行人專用時相 21 2.2.3 行人穿越道服務水準 25 2.3 飽和流率與車輛延滯 29 2.3.1 飽和流率與損失時間 30 2.3.2 車輛延滯 33 2.4 號誌最佳化模式設計 36 2.4.1 號誌設計流程 36 2.4.2 求解目標式 39 2.4.3 號誌設計方式 40 第三章 研究方法 43 3.1 研究構想 43 3.1.1 研究架構 43 3.2 號誌最佳化模式構建 47 3.2.1 號誌最佳化目標式 48 3.2.2 號制限制式 49 3.2.3 流動決策限制式 52 3.2.4 模式參數 61 第四章 行人流特性調查與分析 64 4.1 調查作業內容 64 4.1.1 調查方法 64 4.1.2 調查地點 65 4.2 行人參數分析與校估 67 4.2.1 行人啟動延滯 68 4.2.2 行人穿越時間 72 4.2.3 行人緩衝區間 73 第五章 模式求解與應用 76 5.1 模式求解 76 5.1.1 模式求解工具 76 5.1.2 正交路口情境 77 5.1.3 丁字路口情境 83 5.1.4 左轉保護時相 87 5.2 模式確認 90 5.2.1 交通量變化情境 90 5.2.2 行人穿越需求變化情境 92 5.3 模式驗證 94 5.3.1 模式驗證程序 94 5.3.2 模式驗證結果 95 5.4 案例分析 96 5.4.1 正交路口-松壽路/松智路 97 5.4.2 丁字路口-松高路/松智路 100 第六章 結論與建議 103 6.1 結論 103 6.2 建議 105 參考文獻 107 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 最小化人車延滯行人專用時相路口號誌最佳化之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Optimization Based on Minimizing Vehicle and Pedestrian Delays | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 胡守任(Shou-Ren Hu),吳昆峰(Kun-Feng Wu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 行人專用時相,行人號誌,號誌最佳化模式,流動衝突矩陣, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Exclusive pedestrian phase,Pedestrian Signal,Signal timing optimization,Stream-Conflict Matrix, | en |
dc.relation.page | 111 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.88 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。