請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52677完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 闕河嘉 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Ting Chu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 朱亭亭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:22:55Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Berry, B.J.L. (1976). Urbanization and Counterurbanization. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital (R. Nice, Trans.). In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education , Richardson, L. C. (eds). New York: Greenwood Press, 241-258. Brunori, G. (2011). Alternative trade or market fragmentation? Food circuits and social movements. Quaderni Sismondi 13. Working paper. Laboratorio di studi rurali Sismondi. Brunori, G., Rossi, A., & Malandrin, V. (2011). Co-producing transition: innovation processes in farms adhering to Solidarity-based Purchase Groups (GAS) in Tuscany, Italy. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture, 18 (1), 28-53. Bull, A. , & Corner, P. (1993). From Peasant to Entrepreneur: The Survival of the Family Economy in Italy. Oxford: Berg. Champion, A.G. (1992). Urban and regional demographic trends in the developed world. Urban Studies, 29, 461-482. Champion, A.G. (1998). Studying counterurbanisation and the rural population turnaround. In Migration into Rural Areas, Theories and Issues, Boyle, P., & Halfacree, K. (eds). Wiley: Chichester, 21-40. Craze, R. (2004). Out of your townie mind . Devon: White Ladder Press. Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: mobility in the modern western world. Taylor & Francis. Dupuis, M., & Goodman, D. (2005). Should we go “home” to eat? : toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(3), 359-371. Edensor, T.(2006). Performing rurality. In Handbook of rural studies, Cloke, P., Marsden, T., & Mooney, P. (eds). London: SAGE, 484-495. Escribano, M. J. R. (2007). Migration to rural Navarre: Questioning the experience of counterurbanisation. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 98(1), 32-41. Fairlie, S. (1996). Low Impact Development. Charlbury, Oxfordshire: Jon Carpenter. Fairlie, S. (2001). The dowry: A left wing defence of rural England. South Petherton, Somerset: Chapter 7 Publications. Feagan, R. (2007). The place of food: mapping out the local in local food systems. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 23-42. Garvey, P. (2008). The Norwegian country cabin and functionalism: a tale of two modernities. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 16(2), 203-220. Gkartzios, M.(2013). ‘Leaving Athens’: Narratives of counterurbanisation in times of crisis. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 158-167. Gray, J. (1998). Family farms in the Scottish Borders: a practical definition by hill sheep farmers. Journal of Rural Studies, 14(3), 341-356. Gordon, P. (1979). Deconcentration without a ‘clean break’, Environment and Planning A, 11, 281-289. Halfacree, K. (1994). The importance of ‘the rural’ in the constitution of counterurbanization: evidence from England in the 1980s. Sociologis Ruralis, 34, 164-189. Halfacree, K. (1997). Contrasting roles for the post-productivist countryside. In Contested Countryside Cultures, Cloke, P., & Little, J. (eds). London: Routledge, 67-91. Halfacree, K. (2001). Constructing the object: taxonomic practices, ‘counterurbanisation’ and positioning marginal rural settlement. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 395-411. Halfacree, K. (2006). From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 309-336. Halfacree, K. (2007). Back-to-the-land in the twenty-first century-making connections with rurality. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 98(1), 3-8. Halfacree, K. (2008). To Revitalise Counterurbanisation Research? Recognising an International and Fuller Picture. Population, Space Place, 14, 479-495. Halfacree, K. (2012). Heterolocal Identities? Counter-urbanisation, second Homes, and rural consumption in the era of mobilities. Population, Space and Place, 18, 209-224. Halfacree, K., & Rivera, M. J. (2012). Moving to the Countryside ... and Staying: Lives beyond Representations. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 92-114. Hall, C., & Müller, D. (2004). Introduction: second homes, curse or blessing? Revisited. In Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes, Hall, C., & Müller, D. (eds). Channel View Publications: Clevedon, 3-14. Holloway L. (2002) Smallholding, hobby-farming, and commercial farming: ethical identities and the production of farming spaces. Environment and Planning A, 34, 2055-2070. Holloway, L., & Halfacree, K. (2005). Rooting ourselves in the rural: seeking a back-to-the-land lifestyle in Britain today. Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers' Annual Conference, Denver, USA, March. Holloway L., & Halfacree, K. (2006). Rooted in the rural: seeking a back-to-the-land lifestyle in Britain. Paper presented at the Anglo-French Rural Geography Conference, Vichy, France, May. Jacob, J. (1997). New pioneers: the back-to-the-land movement and the search for a sustainable future. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Jobes, P. (2000). Moving nearer to heaven: the illusions and disillusions of migrants to scenic rural places. Westport: Praeger. Kneafsey, M., Cox, R., Holloway, L., Dowler, E., Venn, L., & Tuomainen, H. (2008). Reconnecting consumers, producers and food: exploring alternatives. Berg. Mackenzie, F. (2006). ‘S Leinn Fhein am Fearann’ (The land is ours): re-claiming land, re-creating community, North Harris, Outer Hebrides, Scotland. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 577-598. Maffesoli, M. (1992). The time of tribes. London: Sage. Mailfert, K. (2007). New farmers and networks: how beginning farmers build social connections in France. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 98(1), 21-31. Marsden, T., & Sonnino, R. (2006). Beyond the divide: rethinking relationships between conventional and alternative food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 6,181-199. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. Routledge: London. McKay, G. (1996). Senseless acts of beauty: cultures of resistance since the sixties. London: Verso. McKay, G. (1998). DiY culture. Party and protest in nineties Britain. London: Verso. McIntyre, N., Williams, D., & McHugh, K. (2006). Multiple dwelling: prospect and retrospect. In Multiple Dwelling and Tourism. Negotiating Place, Home and Identity, McIntyre, N., Williams, D., & McHugh, K. (eds). CABI: Wallingford, 313-322. McVeigh, R. (1997) Theorising sedentarism: the roots of anti-nomadism, In Gypsy politics and traveller identity, Acton, T. (eds). Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 7-25. Mitchell, C. J. A. (2004). Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 15-34. Murdoch, J., Marsden, T., & Banks, J. (2000). Quality, nature and embeddedness: some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography 76(2), 312-328. Perkins, H., &Thorns, D. (2006). Home away from home: the primary/secondary home relationship. In Multiple Dwelling and Tourism. Negotiating Place, Home and Identity, McIntyre, N., Williams, D., & McHugh, K. (eds). CABI: Wallingford; 67-81. Quinn, B. (2004). Dwelling through multiple places: a case study of second home ownership in Ireland. In Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes, Hall, C, & Müller, D. (eds). Channel View Publications: Clevedon; 113-129. Rose, G. (1993). Feminism and Geography. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Roszak, T. (1970). The making of a counter culture. London: Faber. Sheller M, & Urry J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207-226. Schwarz, W., & Schwarz, D. (1998). Living lightly. Travels in post-consumer society. Charlbury, OxfordWire: Jon Carpenter. Spencer, D. (1992). Towards a Firmer Understanding of Counterurbanization, Part 1, Department of Geography, Discussion Paper, University of Reading, 43-46. Thrift, N. (2004) Summoning life, In Envisioning human geographies, Cloke, P., Crang P., & Goodwin, M. (eds). London: Arnold, 81-103. Trauger, A. K. (2005). Social, economic and environmental justice: a network analysis of sustainable agriculture in Pennsylvania. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University. Tuulentie, S. (2007). Settled tourists: second homes as a part of tourist life stories. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 7, 282-301. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity: Cambridge. Vining, D., & Strauss. A. (1997). A demonstration that the current deconcentration of population in the United States is a clean break with the past, Environment and Planning A, 9(1977), 751-758. Wilbur, A. (2012). Seeding alternatives: back-to-the-land migration and alternative agro-food networks in Northern Italy. Unpublished PhD thesis. Wilbur, A. (2014). Cultivating back-to-the-landers: networks of knowledge in rural northern Italy. Sociologia Ruralis, 54(2), 167-185. Williams, R. (1985). The country and the city, London: Hotargh. Winterton, R., & Warburton, J. (2012). Ageing in the bush: The role of rural places in maintaining identity for long term rural residents and retirement migrants in north-east Victoria, Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 28, 329-337. Woods, M. (2011). Rural. New York: Routledge. Young, J.(1973). The hippie solution: an essay in the politics of leisure. In Politics and deviance, Taylor, I., & Taylor, L. (eds). Harmondsworth: Penguin, 182-208. 方怡茹與李承嘉（2007）。科技園區對近鄰鄉村結構影響之研究─新竹寶山鄉仕紳化的觀察。第五屆土地學術研討會。臺北大學等聯合主辦，臺北。 呂愛麗（2009）。知識當鋤頭，青年農夫冒出頭。遠見雜誌，281期。 李承嘉、陳詩薇、林余真、林柏青、歐陽榆（2005）。鄉村仕紳化之研究─以宜蘭縣三星鄉三個村落發展為例。第三屆土地學術研討會。逢甲大學等聯合主辦，臺中。 畢恆達（2000）。家的意義。應用心理研究，第8期，頁55-56。 翁藝珊（2008）。實現心中那畝田？！－以動機歷程模式探討民眾追求田園夢之動機、歷程與回饋（碩士論文）。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/24626344685477254389 張詞詠（2014）。生活風格遷移研究：苗栗「三義藝術村」居民自我認同與地方感（未出版碩士論文）。 許瑋（2014）。半農半Ｘ在花蓮：鄉村移民之社會網絡與社會支持（碩士論文）。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/58328824201199325208 陳文祥（2007）。遷移農村動機與永續生活型態之研究－以台東縣為例（碩士論文）。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/78306419853708666973 陳信煜（2012）。小眾農耕的生存之道－以臺東縣實施秀明自然農法農夫為例（碩士論文）。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/77508879541187982443 黃如珍（2008）。苑裡「回農」的逃離與追尋（碩士論文）。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/39881975299368200337 蔡佩芳（2009）。志願務農者的歸農之行（碩士論文）。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/71522093214538174207 鄭心怡（2014）。鄉村青年移民的半農半X追尋：社會化與自我概念觀點（碩士論文）。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/67044852120367745633 鄭宇婷（2014）。農村的召喚：半農半X農村移居經驗之綠自然照顧探究（碩士論文）。 取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/75948516587368038881 鄭鈺琳（2007）。種出綠色生活圈：志願務農者的生活方式選擇與農耕生活風格社群之形成（碩士論文）。取自http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/48624791149163447555 闕河嘉、呂宜華（2012）。鄉村生活風格移民。發表於2012年第四屆發展研究年會，台北。經濟發展研討會論文集。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52677 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以臺灣「返土歸田」（back-to-the-land）農夫為研究對象，即「原本生長或長期居住於城市，並從非務農者到選擇移居鄉村，並以友善土地的方式耕作」的臺灣新農夫。研究旨趣在於：探討臺灣返土歸田農夫的另類理想、生計與生活面貌，並藉由他們的歸田經驗對當代城市與鄉村關係進行新的詮釋。本研究的研究問題有三：（1）理解這群返土歸田農夫的遷移過程以及他們的遷移理念，並詮釋都市與鄉村對於他們的意義。（2）探究這群返土歸田農夫的生計網絡是如何形成與維繫，並探討生計維繫與實踐理想之間的關係。（3）藉由本研究的案例來討論「移動年代」（an era of mobilities）下返土歸田的意義。本研究主要採取質性訪談的方法蒐集資料，訪問26位返土歸田農夫，並以參與式觀察法協助資料搜尋。在研究結果上，本研究（1）指出臺灣返土歸田「偶發式」的特徵以及其他特色。（2）提出返土歸田農夫社會資本的重要性，在歸田初始階段往往是以親戚、朋友為核心的生計網絡；社群支持乃是返土歸田農夫可以成為一個農夫的關鍵。（3）提出在移動年代下返土歸田農夫所面臨的定居課題、對於家認同的多重來源，以及返土歸田行動的反都市化意義。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research explores Taiwan's “back-to-the-land” phenomenon. Keith Halfacree’s definition of ‘back-to-the-land’ farmers designate those who had no farming background decide to move to rural areas and become full-time farmers. Three research questions are investigated including: 1) why and how these back-to-the-land farmers move to rural areas and become farmers; 2) what their livelihood networks are like, how they form these networks, wherein ideal lifestyle and practical living demands are balanced; 3) what ‘back-to-the-land’ means given ‘the era of mobilities’ that characterizes Taiwan society as a whole. Through interviewing 26 back-to-the-land farmers, the research argues: 1) Taiwan’s back-to-the-landers shows a “contingent” experience for the farmers; 2) famers’ urban social capitals are important to form livelihood network during initial stage of their farming trade; 3) given the era of mobilities, new identity of home is found to explain new meanings of ‘back-to-the-land’ and counterurbanization. The research contributes to literatures of ‘back-to-the-land’ in both Taiwan’s and western rural studies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:22:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02630001-1.pdf: 2417583 bytes, checksum: d0b834a1bc2a6d1b4f3bcdd3a7ee7241 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口委審定書 i 致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景 1 1.2研究目的與重要性 5 1.3研究架構 7 第二章 文獻探討 8 2.1 返土歸田與反主流文化 8 2.2 返土歸田農夫的生計網絡維繫 13 2.3 「移動年代」中的返土歸田意義 17 第三章 研究方法 22 第四章 「偶發式」返土歸田 30 4.1 從都市白領到鄉野農夫的遷移歷程 32 4.1.1 都市，不適合我，不是我要的！ 33 4.1.2 透過「機緣」創造歸田契機 38 4.1.3 務實作農，找出生計與理想間的平衡 45 4.2 臺灣的返土歸田特色 48 4.2.1 與土地的共質性：被土地「綁住」了？ 48 4.2.2 生計型態的多元性 54 4.2.3 「不為反而反」的反主流文化 59 4.2.4 農耕與性別 73 4.3 結論與討論 76 第五章 成為一個以農為生的農夫 79 5.1 以親屬、朋友關係為中心的銷售網絡 82 5.1.1 社會資本乃是創業根基 82 5.1.2 親友網絡的特色 84 5.1.3 志同道合：由「理念」而結合的消費社群？ 89 5.1.4 在地社會資本的助力 93 5.2 打造個人品牌的重要性 96 5.2.1 信任成就生計 96 5.2.2 象徵資本有助於生計 97 5.3 農業文化資本的形成與養成 99 5.3.1 從體驗與試驗中學習 99 5.3.2 做中學，找到解決方法 102 5.3.3 由關係網絡中養成農業文化資本 104 5.4 他們的鄉村生活 107 5.4.1 自己的日常生活 107 5.4.2 參與鄉村的日常生活 111 5.5 結論與討論 114 第六章 移動年代中返土歸田的遷移 117 6.1 移動年代對定居主義的挑戰 117 6.2 我的家在鄉村，但也在都市 122 6.2.1「暫停」於鄉村 122 6.2.2 多元地方的家認同 132 6.2.3 生活空間與工作空間之分離 136 6.2.4 地區差異？ 137 6.3 歸田生活的反都市化故事 143 6.3.1 返土歸田並未與都市產生斷裂 144 6.3.2 返土歸田獨特的反都市化遷移動機 146 6.3.3 移動年代下返土歸田的反都市化 149 6.4 結論與討論 152 第七章 總結 155 7.1 研究結論 155 7.2 研究貢獻與研究建議 158 7.3 研究未來方向 159 參考文獻 160 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 移動年代 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 返土歸田 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 反主流文化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生計 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共質性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 鄉村遷移 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | back-to-the-land | en |
| dc.subject | rural migration | en |
| dc.subject | livelihoods | en |
| dc.subject | era of mobilities | en |
| dc.subject | urban and rural | en |
| dc.title | 離開都市，融入鄉村？──從臺灣返土歸田農夫的生計與生活探討當代城鄉關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Leaving from urban, integrating into rural? Examining urban-rural dialectical relationships through livelihoods and everyday life of the back-to-the-land farmers in Taiwan. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡建福,譚鴻仁 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 返土歸田,反主流文化,生計,共質性,鄉村遷移,移動年代, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | back-to-the-land,rural migration,livelihoods,era of mobilities,urban and rural, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 167 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.36 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。