請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52498完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃麗君(Li-Chun Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chien-Shen Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉建伸 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:16:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.世界自然基金會香港分會(2014)。海鮮選擇指南。取自http://awsassets.wwfhk.panda.org/downloads/wwf_2014booklet_chi_part1_2_0223_2.pdf。 2.王玟苓(2012)。數位匯流下新聞閱讀行為之探究–以網路新聞為例。國立臺北大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。 3.王姿惠、刁儷雅、林豐瑞(2012),產品屬性、品牌形象、消費情境影響滿意度之研究-以具認驗證標章之生鮮農產品為例。農業推廣文彙,57,39-58。 4.左繡藺(2012)。台北市消費者對水產養殖產品消費偏好與產銷履歷驗證制度認知及接受度之研究。國立臺灣海洋大學水產養殖學研究碩士論文。 5.自由時報(2018)。虱目魚也能做成鑫鑫腸 彌陀推出多項水產伴手禮。自由時報,日期:2018-08-07。取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2512213。 6.行政院農業委員會(2017)。中華民國台閩地區漁業統計年報(中華民國106年)。行政院農業委員會漁業署。 7.朱鴻鈞(2010)。全球漁業發展現況及未來趨勢分析--兼論臺灣漁業發展現況。農業生技產業季刊,22,6-10。 8.朱鴻鈞、陳葦芋、陳政忻(2009)。台灣鯛產業概況及趨勢。農業生技產業季刊,19,21-23。 9.杜宇(2017)。永續水產養殖產品為未來消費趨勢。蘋果即時,網路數位新聞,日期:2017-03-05。取自http://php.trying.com.tw/kunedu/upload/03-03-03-a003.pdf。 10.吳美錚(2016)。2015年全球水產養殖產品的生産、消費與貿易。水產試驗所電子報,第118期 2016年02月26日。取自http://www.tfrin.gov.tw/friweb/frienews/enews0118/p4.html。 11.李金泉(1997)。如何精通SPSS for Windows統計分析。台北市:松崗。 12.呂麗容(2009)。水產養殖產品在學童營養午餐中之比例與學童喜好之研究-以基隆市東信國小為例。國立臺灣海洋大學環境生物與漁業科學所碩士論文。 13.邱文彥(2017)。海洋與海岸管理。台北市:五南圖書。 14.周文賢(2004)。多變量統計分析。台北市:智勝文化。 15.周文賢、李宏達(1992)。市場調查與行銷策略研擬-理論基礎與實務應用。台北市:華泰書局。 16.林雨欣、李季樺、林家驊、顏薏貞、莊曜陽、陳冠文(2017)。水產食品中超高壓加工技術的應用與發展現況。海大漁推,47,17-32。 17.林彥宏、林志遠(2016)。全球智慧養殖漁業產業代表性案例研究。農業生技產業季刊,48,35-42。 18.林彥宏、徐祁暐(2014)。台灣冷凍水產養殖產品產業發展利基、挑戰與趨勢報導。水產養殖生技,38,39-43。 19.林國棟、黃顯龍、劉宗賢(2010)。生鮮漁產品消費行為與購買重視因素之研究—以大高雄地區消費者為例。國立高雄海洋科技大學運籌管理系 2010 運籌實習成果發表會。 20.洪柏懿(2012)。農業100年精華-臺灣漁業百年風華。農政與農情237期,取自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2445337。 21.胡興華(2006)。台灣漁業的歷史與文化。海洋文化學刊,2,25-48。 22.徐承堉(2018)。失落十年的水產養殖王國如何再起?台灣養殖漁業的永續之路。上下游電子報,漁業養殖畜牧。取自https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/104163/。 23.張佳惠(2014)。創新產品屬性及知覺價值對採用意願之影響―以LINE為例。大葉大學管理學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。 24.張景盛、藍宜亭、陳卜橋、黃俊英(2011)。產品屬性、知覺風險與知覺利益之關係:以網路通路為例。行銷評論,8(1),125-148。 25.張蓓琪、沈秀玲(2010)。消費者採用創新產品之影響因素分析-以電子書閱讀器為例。國立高雄海洋科技大學學報,24,191-220。 26.張曉芬(2004)。台灣地區家庭漁產品消費行爲分析與其願付價格之估算。國立臺灣海洋大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文。 27.郭巧琳(2011)。臺灣養殖漁業政策指標系統建構之研究。臺灣海洋大學漁業生産與管理研究所碩士論文。 28.郭仁杰、葉信利(2007)。推動養殖水產養殖產品產銷履歷制度的展望。水試專訊,17,35-39。 29.陳君如(2000)。台灣養殖漁業發展沿革。中國水產月刊,569,13-30。 30.陳宗志(2003)。消費者對創新產品購賣意願因素之探討-以無線網路產品(WLAN)為例。國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士論文。 31.陳思瑋(2011)。消費者對農產品新食用方式之採用行為研究。臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所碩士論文。 32.陳柏璇(2018)。專題演講紀要—傳統與新穎之水產加工品及冷鏈系統介紹。水試所電子報。取自http://www.tfrin.gov.tw。 33.陳家勇(2016)。推動水產養殖經營與友善環境調適策略。農政與農情294期,取自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2505840。 34.陳潔瑩(1994)。隱喻與換喻於產品設計之應用研究。成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。 35.黃鈺茹、蕭泉源(2011)。不同水生生物來源所得之膠原蛋白物理與生物化學相關特性。海大漁推,41,17-52。 36.黃麗君(2010)。國產金棗行銷策略之研究。行政院農委會農糧署99年度科技計畫研究。1-57。 37.楊名豪(2017)。「水產養殖產品之透明性與永續性」國際研討會概況(下)。農政與農情301期,取自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2506573。 38.農業科技專案計畫服務網(2016)。高附加價值水產加工食品之創新研發-宏益冷凍食品股份有限公司。行政院農業委員會農業科技專案計畫服務網,日期:2016-12-28。取自https://agtech.coa.gov.tw/Topic/topic_more?id=f35bcf689c834e458f606096cc767b6f 39.榮泰生(2006)。SPSS與研究方法。台北市:五南圖書。 40.漁業署(2007)。各消費層水產養殖產品偏好調查分析。行政院農業委員會漁業署研究報告。取自https://www.fa.gov.tw/cht/GovReport/content.aspx?id=217 chk=A3C2AA28-EF52-4D5B-BB15-84A00B881F20 param。 41.漁業署(2018)。漁業統計年報,統計與出版品。檢自https://www.fa.gov.tw/cht/PublicationsFishYear/index.aspx。 42.劉宏祺(1995)。台北市家庭生鮮水產養殖產品消費需求之研究。國立海洋大學漁業經濟所碩士論文。 43.劉依蓁、楊玉婷、李雅琳(2015)。機能性農產品開發及發展策略。農業生技產業季刊,42,21-31。 44.劉祥熹、莊慶達、邱信達(2001)。漁村社區發展與建設績效之模糊多準則評估。農業經濟叢刊,7(1),63-99。 45.劉富光(2002)。台灣加入WTO養殖漁業之出路。農政與農情117期,取自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=4076。 46.賴世堃(2008)。消費者對有機米的認知及購買意願分析。中興大學行銷學系所碩士論文。 47.繆自昌(2001)。陸上魚塭養殖漁業登記及管理規則。農政與農情105期,取自https://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2562。 48.蔡馨儀(2016)。消費者創新性與認知創新產品屬性對新產品接受意願之影響-以iPad為例。國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 49.蕭泉源(2005)。水產加工。實用食品加工學,第七章,pp.7-1- 7-56。台中市:華格那出版社。 50.蕭泉源(2008)。水產養殖產品品質安全管控。海大漁推 ,38,1-32。 51.羅傳進(1998)。臺灣漁業發展史。台北市:作者自行出版。 52.聯合國糧食及農業組織(2018)。世界漁業和水產養殖狀況。世界回顧(頁2-83)。取自http://www.fao.org/3/I9540ZH/i9540zh.pdf。 53.謝安田(1983)。企業研究方法。台北市:作者自行出版。 54.謝佩吟(2006)。產品屬性對創新採用之影響-以網路通路為干擾變項。國立中正大學企業管理所碩士論文。 55.韓玉山(2016)。台灣鰻魚養殖史。臺大漁推,27,5-18。 56.韓興勇、鄭星宇(2016)。沿海城市居民海產品消費特徵研究。海洋开发与管理,4,8-13。 57.蘇偉成、劉富光(2005)。台灣水產養殖的永續經營。科學發展,385,42-49。 58.Abe, H. (1995). Histidine-related dipeptides: distribution, metabolism, and physiological function. In “Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes” (P. W. Hochachka and T. P. Mommsen, eds.) Vol. 4, pp.309-333. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 59.American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1974). Standards for educational psychological tests. American Psychological Association. 60.Akbar, A., Ali, S., Ahmad, M. A., Akbar, M. Danish, M. (2019). Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Consumption in Pakistan: Moderating Role of Food Neophobia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 4043-4062. 61.Arvola, A., LÄhteenmäki, l., Tuorila, H. (1999). Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familiar cheeses: The effects of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia. Appetite, 32(1), 113-126. 62.Boyd, T. C., Mason, C. H. (1999). The link between attractiveness of “Extrabrand” attributes and the adoption of innovations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 306-319. 63.Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devituiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F., Nardone, G. (2015). Consumer purchasing behavior towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. Appetite, 84, 212-227 64.Diker, A., Walters, L. M., Cunningham-Sabo, L. Baker, S. S. (2011). Factors influencing adoption and implementation of cooking with kids: An experiential school-based nutrition education curriculum, Journal of Extension, 49(1), 1-13. 65.Eertmans, A., Victoira, A., Vansant, G. Bergh, O. V. (2005). Food-related personality traits, food choice motives and food intake: Mediator and moderator relationships, Food Quality and Preference, 16(8), 714-726. 66.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO] (2000). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture-2000. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-x8002e.pdf 67.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. E., Black, W. C. (1997). Multivariate data analysis: With readings, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 68.Henriques, S. A., King, S. C. Meiselmana, H. L. (2009). Consumer segmentation based on food neophobia and its application to product development, Food Quality and Preference, 20(2), 83-91. 69.Heri, S., Mosler, H. J. (2008). Factors affecting the diffusion of solar water disinfection: A field study in Bolivia. Health Education Behavior, 35(4), 541-560. 70.Holak, S. L. (1988). Determinants of innovative durables adoption an empirical study with implications for early product screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 59(1), 50-69. 71.Holak, S. L. and Lehmann, D. R. (1990). Purchase intentions and the dimensions of innovation: An exploratory model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(1), 59-73. 72.Horvátha, C., Adıgüzel, F. (2018). Shopping enjoyment to the extreme: Hedonic shopping motivations and compulsive buying in developed and emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 86, 300-310. 73.Jaeger, R. S., Rossiter, L. K. Lau, K. (2005). Consumer perceptions of novel fruit and familiar fruit: A repertory grid application, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85(3), 480-488. 74.Johnson E. J., Meyer, R. J., Hardie, B. G. S., Anderson, P. (1997). Watching customers decide: Process measures add insights to choice modeling. Marketing Research Forum, 9(4), p.32-37. 75.Johnson, P., Hammer, J. L. (1989). Effects of L-1-methyl-Lhistidine and the muscle dipeptides carnosine and anserine on the activities of muscle calpains. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 94B, 45- 48. 76.Johnson, P, K., Lennon, J. S., Jasper, C., Damhorst, M. L. Lakner, H. B. (2003). An application Rogers’s innovation model: Use of the internet to purchase apparel, food, and home furnishing products by small community consumers, Clothing and Textiles, 28(4): 185-196. 77.Kaiser, H. (1970). A second generation little jiffy, Psychomertrika, 35(4), 401-405. 78.Korn, A., Janssen, M. (2014). Thinking aloud about sustainable aquaculture products: Consumer perceptions and barriers to communication. In: Rahmann, G. Aksoy, U. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 4th ISOFAR Scientific Conference. Building Organic Bridges, at the Organic World Congress 2014, 13-15 Oct., Istanbul, Turkey. 79.Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. 9th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 80.Kotler, P., Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson. 81.Liu J., Cui, Y., Li, L., Wu, L., Hanlon, A., Pinto-Martin, J., Raine, A., Hibbeln, J. R. (2017). The mediating role of sleep in the fish consumption- cognitive functioning relationship: a cohort study. Scientific Reports,7, 17961. 82.Margolis, F. L., Grillo, M. (1984). Carnosine, homocarnosine and anserine in vertebrate retinas. Neurochem. Intl. 6: 207-209. 83.McGuirk, A., Droscoll, P., Alwang, J., Huang, H. (1995). System misspecification testing and structural change in the demand for meats. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 20(1), 1-21. 84.Meiselman, H. L., King, S. C., Gillette, M. (2010). The demographics of neophobia in a large commercial US sample. Food Quality and Preference, 21(7), 893-897. 85.Mesnildrey, L., Lesueur, M., Gouin, S. (2010). Motivations and needs of consumers of fresh seafood products in france: New opportunities and marketing strategies. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics Trade (IIFET 2010), Montpellier, France. 86.Mintel (2019). Global Food and Drink Trends 2019. Retrieved from http://www.mintel.com/global-food-and-drink-trends/. 87.Moon, M.A., Khalid, M. J., Awanc, H. M., Attiq, S., Rasool, H., Kiran, M. (2017). Consumer's perceptions of website's utilitarian and hedonic attributes and online purchase intentions: A cognitive–affective attitude approach. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 21(3), 73-88. 88.Nielsen (2015). The Sustainability Imperative. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/co/docs/Reports/2015/global-sustainability-report.pdf 89.Pitkow, J. E., Recker, M. M. (1995). Using the web as a survey tool: Results from the second www user survey. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 27(6), 809–822. 90.Pliner, P., Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19(2), 155-120. 91.Quinn, P., Boldyrev, A., Formazuyk, V. (1992). Carnosine: Its properties, functions and potential therapeutic applications. Molec. Aspects Med. 13: 379-444. 92.Raudenbush, B., Frank, R. A. (1999). Assessing food neophobia: The role of stimulus familiarity. Appetite, 32(2), 261-271. 93.Redmond, H. P., Stapleton, P. P., Neary, P., Bouchier-Hayes, D. J. (1998). Immunonutrition: The role of taurine. Nutr. 14: 599-604. 94.Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovation, 1st ed. New York: Free Press. 95.Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation, 3rd ed. New York :Free Press. 96.Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed. New York: Free Press. 97.Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation, 5th ed. New York: Free Press. 98.Rozin, P., Vollmecke, T. A. (1986). Food likes and dislikes. Annual Review of Nutrition, 6(1), 433-456. 99.Sturman, J.A. (1993). Taurine in development. Physiol. Rev. 73: 119- 147. 100.Swanson, K. K., Horridge, P. E. (2004). A structural model for souvenir consumption, travel activities, and tourist demographics. Journal of Travel Research, 42(4), 372-380. 101.Szűcs I., Tikász I. E., Fehér M., Stündl L. (2018). Testing for consumer preferences of smoked asian sea bass (Barramundi) filet products in Hungary. Cogent Business Management, 5, 1432158. 102.Taylor, S. and Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effect in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 239-260. 103.Tse, A. (1998). Comparing the response rate, response speed and response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: E-mail vs. mail. Journal of Market Research Society, 40: 353-361. 104.Tuorila, H., Andersson, A., Martikainen, A. Salovaara, H. (1998). Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Quality and Preference, 9(5), 313-320. 105.Tuorila, H., Lähteenmäki, L., Pohjalainen L., Lotti, L. (2001). Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference, 12(1), 29-37. 106.Tuorila, H., Meiselman, H. L., Bell, R., Cardello, A.V., Johnson, W. (1994). Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and linking for novel and familiar foods. Appetite, 23(3), 231-46. 107.Tuorila, H., Meiselman, H. L., Cardello, V. A., Lesher, L. L. (1998). Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on the acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference, 9(6), 421-430. 108.Wang, E. S. T. (2017). Different effects of utilitarian and hedonic benefits of retail food packaging on perceived product quality and purchase intention. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23(3), 239-250. 109.Wood, L. (2007). Functional and symbolic attributes of product selection. British Food Journal, 109(2), 108-118. 110.Zaltman, G., Burger, P. C. (1975). Marketing Research: fundamentals and dynamics. USA Ill: Dryden Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52498 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 水產養殖產品是全球交易量最大的食用商品之一,其發展策略須考慮市場喜好,也需針對消費者接受度進行綜合評估,以利對消費者的需求進行創新性的產品開發。未來的飲食趨勢為永續發展、健康老化及便利飲食,水產養殖產品亦應朝這三種趨勢進行創新發展,包括利用新的加工技術或包裝行銷方式所發展出的符合安全、健康、永續的水產養殖產品、利用加工廠完成基本處理與分切包裝凍藏的水產養殖產品、初步完成食物調理及開發成加熱即食的水產養殖產品、開發出新樣貌或新吃法等持續求新求變的水產養殖產品…等,以吸引消費者的青睞。本研究依產品種類特性,分別以魚丸、魚排、鮮魚高湯和魚肉水餃四種創新水產養殖產品為例,以不具名方式透過網路平臺、網頁等群組宣傳發放問卷開放消費者填寫,進行問卷調查,研究對象以購買過峰漁水產養殖產品之會員為主,為達足夠問卷調查數量,也開放峰漁Facebook粉絲團專頁平台愛用者填寫。研究中探討消費者對創新水產養殖產品屬性認知與創新水產養殖產品種類接受度的關係,以及消費者新食品恐懼症的程度對屬性認知和接受度之關係的干擾作用,希望可為創新水產養殖產品推廣前針對消費者消費習慣擬定策略,並使推廣販售創新水產養殖產品時讓消費者認同,以減少不必要的行銷成本開支。研究中分別觀察相對優勢、一致性、複雜性、可試用性和可觀察性等五個認知屬性因素對創新水產養殖產品接受度的影響,結果發現五個因素中歸類出美觀性、飲食習慣符合性、便利性和可試用性等四個因素對創新水產養殖產品的接受度有顯著性的正相關,即對屬性的認同度越高,對產品的接受度就越高,顯示消費者所認知的創新水產養殖產品屬性對創新水產養殖產品種類接受度具顯著影響。利用層級迴歸檢驗新食品恐懼症對屬性認知與產品接受度之關係的影響,結果發現消費者的新食品恐懼症程度與產品接受度呈現顯著的負相關,即對新食品恐懼程度越高者,對產品的接受度就越低,研究中也發現新食品恐懼症與創新水產養殖產品接受度的關係不具干擾作用。利用集群分析區隔出三類消費者群體,其中對創新水產養殖產品接受度較高的集群對產品的四種屬性的認同度都較高,為創新水產養殖產品高認知者的主要族群;人數較多的創新水產養殖產品中認知者集群對四種屬性認同度的平均值都在小部分同意到大部分同意之間,且對便利性屬性的認同度較高,所以須強調創新水產養殖產品的食用和烹調的便利性,為產品宣傳的重要族群;對創新水產養殖產品接受度較低的為創新水產養殖產品低認知者集群,對可試用性屬性的認同度較低,需增加產品銷售通路或媒體傳播的體驗機會,讓產品增加曝光度提升對創新水產養殖產品之接受度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Aquaculture products are one of the foodstuffs for the most transaction volume in the world.Its development strategy must consider market preferences and proceed the overall assessment of consumer acceptance, and must develop the exploitation targets on the global market demand. In the future, the trend of diet will be sustainable development, healthy aging and convenient diet. Aquatic products should also be innovatively developed based on these three types of tendency, such as the use of new processing technology or packaging methods to produce the safe, healthy and sustainable aquaculture products, the utilization of the processing plants to complete the basic processing, cutting, packaging and frozen aquatic products, the aquatic products that have preliminary seasoning of food and develop into a ready-to-eat products, or the developing of new aquatic products with new appearance or new way of eating, all these holds continuously innovation and change to attract consumers’ purchase intentions. This study is divided into four innovative aquatic product questionnaires of fish balls, fish steaks, fresh fish soup and fish dumplings based on the characteristics of product types. Questionnaires are opened for consumers to answer through an anonymous way from online platforms, webpages, etc. The research targets are mainly members who have purchased Fongyu's aquaculture products. In order to reach a sufficient number of samples, the questionnaires are also open to the members of the Fongyu Facebook fan page to fill in. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between consumers’ cognition of the attributes of innovative aquatic products and the acceptance of innovative aquatic products, and the interference of consumers’ degree of food neophobia on the relationship between attribute cognition and acceptance. Expect strategy can be formulated for consumer consumption habits before the promotion of innovative aquatic products, and can be recognized while promoting and selling innovative aquaculture products by consumers so as to reduce unnecessary marketing costs. In the study, five major cognitive attributed factors such as relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability were observed for the effect on acceptance of innovative aquaculture products. The results we can categorize into four factors that aesthetics, conformity to eating habits, convenience and trialability have a significantly positive correlation with the acceptance of innovative aquatic products. It indicates that the higher recognition of the attribute, also the higher acceptance of the product, it shows that the attributes of innovative aquaculture products recognized by consumers have a significant effect on the acceptance of innovative aquaculture products. To test the influence of new food phobia on the relationship between attribute perception and product acceptance by hierarchical regression principle, the results found that consumers’ new food phobia and product acceptance are both significantly negatively correlated. It means that the higher the fear of new food, the lower the acceptance of the product. The study also discovers that the relationship between new food phobia and the acceptance of innovative aquaculture products does not interfere mutually. This study also utilizes cluster analysis to distinguish samples into three types of consumers. Among them, the clusters with higher product acceptance have higher cognition of the four factors of the product. They are the main group of the higher recognition for the innovative aquaculture products. In the innovative aquaculture products with group of a large number of people, the average value of the recognition of the four attributes by the cognizant cluster is between a small part of the agreement and the majority of the agreement. And have a higher of recognition for convenience attributes. Therefore, it is necessary to emphasize the convenience of eating and cooking of the innovative aquatic products, and it is an important group for product promotion. Those with lower acceptance of innovative aquaculture products are clusters of people with lower recognition of innovative aquaculture products, also lower recognition of the attribute of trialability. It is necessary to increase products sales channels or experience opportunities of media spread, increasing products exposure and increasing acceptance of innovative aquaculture products. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:16:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0608202017123400.pdf: 1942612 bytes, checksum: 05521e704053aeb97af28d3653d92b6e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I 謝誌 II 摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 圖目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節 台灣養殖漁業發展概況 3 第二節 台灣養殖產業與水產養殖產品發展面臨的困境及問題 5 第三節 台灣水產養殖產品消費的必要性 9 第四節 全球性水產養殖產品發展創新趨勢分析 12 第五節 水產養殖產品消費行為研究結果回顧 14 第六節 產品屬性 16 第七節 新食品恐懼症 18 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 研究變數定義與衡量 21 一. 創新產品屬性 21 二. 創新水產養殖產品種類接受度 22 三. 新食品恐懼症 22 第二節 研究架構 22 第三節 問卷設計 24 第四節 調查研究方法 26 第五節 資料分析方法 26 一. 敘述性統計分析 27 二. 信度分析 27 三. 效度分析 27 四. 因素分析 28 五. 多元廻歸分析 29 六. 干擾作用檢驗 29 七. 集群分析 29 第四章 資料分析與結果 30 第一節 樣本結構分析 30 第二節 因素分析與信、效度分析 33 一. 因素分析 33 二. 信度分析 37 三. 效度分析 38 第三節 迴歸分析 41 第四節 新食品恐懼症干擾作用檢測 44 第五節 集群分析 45 第五章 結論與建議 50 第一節 研究結果與討論 50 第二節 管理意涵 52 第三節 研究限制與未來建議 58 參考文獻 61 附錄1-問卷 72 附錄2-因素分析原始負荷量表 88 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 新食品恐懼症 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 消費者接受度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Consumer acceptance | en |
| dc.subject | Food neophobia | en |
| dc.subject | Innovatio | en |
| dc.title | 消費者對創新水產養殖產品接受度之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A study on consumer acceptance toward innovative aquaculture products | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 孫岩章(En-Jhang Sun),朱家賢(Chia-Hsien Chu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 創新,消費者接受度,新食品恐懼症, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Innovatio,Consumer acceptance,Food neophobia, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 89 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202002563 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0608202017123400.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.9 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
