Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 職業醫學與工業衛生研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52423
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳焜裕(Kuen-Yuh Wu)
dc.contributor.authorI-Ting Shihen
dc.contributor.author施沂廷zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T16:14:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-14
dc.date.copyright2015-09-14
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-08-18
dc.identifier.citation1. Andersen, F.A., Final report on the safety assessment of maleic acid. International Journal of Toxicology, 2007. 26: p. 125-130.
2. Reassessment of the one exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for maleic anhydride(CAS#108-31-6) and maleic acid (CAS#110-16-7), U.S.EPA., Editor. 2006: Washington, D.C. p. 16.
3. National Occupational Exposure Survey NIOSH, Editor. 1985.
4. Grant, W.M., Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. 1986, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
5. Reboucas, N.A., et al., Proximal tubular HCO3-, H+ and fluid transport during maleate-induced acidification defect. Pflugers Arch, 1984. 401(3): p. 266-71.
6. Clayton, G.D.a.F.E.C., Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 3rd ed. Toxicology. Vol. 2A, 2B, 2C. 1981-1982., New York: John Wiley Sons.
7. Shimomura, M., Effects of maleic acid administration on urinary excretion of DCEC, and on tissue protein, in the rat. Physiol Chem Phys, 1977. 9(6): p. 539-42.
8. Chen, H.-C., C. Wu, and K.-Y. Wu, Determination of the maleic acid in rat urine and serum samples by isotope dilution–liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry with on-line solid phase extraction. Talanta, 2015. 136(0): p. 9-14.
9. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists TLVs and BEIs. 2008: Cincinnati, OH. p. 37.
10. Titiova NN, Z.R., Kazan Med Zh, 1977. 58(1): p. 36-7.
11. Short, R.D., et al., Teratology and multigeneration reproduction studies with maleic anhydride in rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol, 1986. 7(3): p. 359-66.
12. High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) on Fumaric Acid (110178), E.O.o.P.P.a. Toxics, Editor. 2009.
13. Hohenegger, M., et al., Nephrotoxicity of fumaric acid monoethylester. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1989. 252: p. 265-72.
14. Fitzhugh, O.G. and A.A. Nelson, The comparative chronic toxicities of fumaric, tartaric, oxalic, and maleic acids. J Am Pharm Assoc Am Pharm Assoc, 1947. 36(7): p. 217-9.
15. Dalhoff, K., et al., Acute kidney failure during psoriasis therapy with fumaric acid derivatives. Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 1990. 115(26): p. 1014-7.
16. Roodnat, J.I., et al., Acute kidney insufficiency in the treatment of psoriasis using fumaric esters. Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 1989. 119(23): p. 826-30.
17. Raschka, C. and H.J. Koch, Longterm treatment of psoriasis using fumaric acid preparations can be associated with severe proximal tubular damage. Hum Exp Toxicol, 1999. 18(12): p. 738-9.
18. Rowe, R.C., Sheskey, P.J., Quinn, M.E., Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients 6th edition. 2009, London, England: Pharmaceutical Press.
19. Burdock, G.A., Fenaroli's Handbook of Flavor Ingredients. 6th ed. 2010, Boca Raton, FL.
20. 食品安全衛生管理法第十八條第1項 中華民國法務部
21. Lian, H.Z., et al., Simultaneous determination of oxalic, fumaric, maleic and succinic acids in tartaric and malic acids for pharmaceutical use by ion-suppression reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 1999. 19(3–4): p. 621-625.
22. Suarez-Luque, S., et al., Solid-phase extraction procedure to remove organic acids from honey. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2002. 770(1-2): p. 77-82.
23. Suárez-Luque, S., et al., Different forms of maleic and fumaric acids (cis and trans of 2-butenedioic acid) in honey. Food Chemistry, 2003. 80(2): p. 215-219.
24. Suarez-Luque, S., et al., Rapid determination of minority organic acids in honey by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A, 2002. 955(2): p. 207-14.
25. Käkölä, J. and R. Alén, A fast method for determining low-molecular-mass aliphatic carboxylic acids by high-performance liquid chromatography–atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of Separation Science, 2006. 29(13): p. 1996-2003.
26. Bylund, D., et al., Analysis of low molecular mass organic acids in natural waters by ion exclusion chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 2007. 1176(1–2): p. 89-93.
27. Chen, Z., et al., Confirmation and determination of carboxylic acids in root exudates using LC–ESI-MS. Journal of Separation Science, 2007. 30(15): p. 2440-2446.
28. He, J.-F., et al., Determination of fumaric and maleic acids with stacking analytes by transient moving chemical reaction boundary method in capillary electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatography A, 2011. 1218(24): p. 3816-3821.
29. Fanny Fu and A. Schreiber, LC-(DMS)-MS/MS Analysis of Emerging Food Contaminants. 2013.
30. Xu, D., et al., Determination of the total amount of maleic acid and maleic anhydride in starch and its products by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Se Pu, 2013. 31(12): p. 1224-7.
31. Chen, Y., et al., Determination of total maleic acid, fumaric acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and benzoic acid in food by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Methods, 2014. 6(13): p. 4803-4809.
32. Method of Test for Total Amount of Maleic Acid and Maleic Anhydride in Foods 2013, Taiwan Food and Drug Administration.
33. Lin, X., et al., Determination of organic acids in rice wine by ion-exclusion chromatography. Se Pu, 2014. 32(3): p. 304-8.
34. Kitanovski, Z., I. Grgic, and M. Veber, Characterization of carboxylic acids in atmospheric aerosols using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A, 2011. 1218(28): p. 4417-25.
35. Grant, W.M., Toxicology of the Eye. 3rd ed. 1986: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
36. Diogo, J.S., et al., Risk assessment of additives through soft drinks and nectars consumption on Portuguese population: a 2010 survey. Food Chem Toxicol, 2013. 62: p. 548-53.
37. 白芳瑜, 食品中全氟碳化合物濃度調查,環境衛生研究所. 2011, 臺灣大學
38. 張瓊文, 以免疫親和管柱與極致液相層析/串聯式質譜儀搭配同位素稀釋技術分析市售咖啡飲品中赭麴毒素a,環境衛生研究所. 2011, 臺灣大學
39. Matuszewski, B.K., M.L. Constanzer, and C.M. Chavez-Eng, Strategies for the Assessment of Matrix Effect in Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Based on HPLC−MS/MS. Analytical Chemistry, 2003. 75(13): p. 3019-3030.
40. Paulo, M.J., et al., Risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticides using a Bayesian method. Pest Management Science, 2005. 61(8): p. 759-766.
41. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans., IARC, Editor. 1991: Lyon. p. 61-89.
42. Feldman, R.S., W.S. Ryder, and J.T. Kung, Importance of nonvolatile compounds to the flavor of coffee. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1969. 17(4): p. 733-739.
43. Maier, H.G., The acids of coffee. 1987, Montreux: Assoiation Scientifique Internationale du Café.
44. Jham, G.N., et al., Comparison of GC and HPLC for the quantification of organic acids in coffee. Phytochem Anal, 2002. 13(2): p. 99-104.
45. Harrison, H.E. and H.C. Harrison, Experimental production of renal glycosuria, phosphaturia, and aminoaciduria by injection of maleic acid. Science, 1954. 120(3120): p. 606-8.
46. Kramer, H.J. and H.C. Gonick, Effect of maleic acid on sodium-linked tubular transport in experimental Fanconi syndrome. Nephron, 1973. 10(5): p. 306-19.
47. Woods, L.L. and E.W. Young, Impaired renal hemodynamic response to protein feeding in dogs with experimental Fanconi syndrome. Am J Physiol, 1991. 261(1 Pt 2): p. F14-21.
48. Everett, R.M., et al., Nephrotoxicity of pravadoline maleate (WIN 48098-6) in dogs: evidence of maleic acid-induced acute tubular necrosis. Fundam Appl Toxicol, 1993. 21(1): p. 59-65.
49. Eiamong, S., et al., Insights into the biochemical-mechanism of maleic acid-induse fanconi syndrome. Kidney International, 1995. 48(5): p. 1542-1548.
50. IUCLID Dataset. 2005, European Chemicals Bureau.
51. Sheftel, V.O., Indirect Food Additives and Polymers. Migration and Toxicology. 2000, Boca Raton, FL.: Lewis Publishers.
52. Documentation of Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices for 2001, A.C.o.G.I. Hygienists, Editor. 2001: Cincinnati. p. 2.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52423-
dc.description.abstract順丁烯二酸酐(Maleic anhydride),工業上常用於製造船隻、汽車、水管和家電之聚酯樹酯的原料。2013年,台灣爆發「順丁烯二酸酐化製澱粉」事件,為非法添加順丁烯二酸酐化製澱粉於澱粉製品中,以增加澱粉製品的Q彈口感並降低產品成本,其製品包括粉圓、肉圓、粄條、黑輪和米粉等等。順丁烯二酸酐在水中極易形成順丁烯二酸(Maleic acid),而順丁烯二酸在大鼠和狗身上會出現類似人類范可尼氏症候群(Fanconi syndrome)的症狀,包括糖尿(Glucosuria)、胺基酸尿(Aminoaciduria)、磷酸鹽尿(Phosphaturia),並且會影響腎臟的酸鹼平衡和近端腎小管的再吸收功能,推測其原因是由於順丁烯二酸的暴露導致刷狀緣上柱狀細胞離子傳輸的功能受損所致,特別是在腎臟皮質的髓射線以及腎臟髓質的外條紋部分,但其在人體中的影響機制仍有待確認。美國國家環境保護局(United Sates Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. EPA)以兩年毒理試驗的數據定訂順丁烯二酸酐的參考劑量(Reference dose, RfD)為0.1 mg/kg/day。
反丁烯二酸(Fumaric acid)為順丁烯二酸的幾何異構物,早在1946年便開始作為食品添加物,美國藥物食品管理局(U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. FDA)和台灣衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(Taiwan Food and Drug Administration, TFDA)亦將其歸類為食品添加物,可適量添加在食品和食品包裝材中。世界衛生組織食品添加劑專家聯合委員會(The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, JECFA)定訂反丁烯二酸的每日容許攝取量(Acceptable daily intake, ADI)為6 mg/kg bw。因此,本研究的研究目的在於建立以液相串聯式質譜儀搭配同素稀釋法分析食品中順丁烯二酸和反丁烯二酸的分析方法,並對台灣19到65歲的成人進行暴露劑量的估算。
食品樣本是自2015年4月開始收集,購買自台北市傳統市場、手搖杯飲料店和量販通路,樣本種類包含米粉、冬粉、肉圓、黑輪、太白粉、木薯粉、在來米粉、果凍、年糕、粉圓以及咖啡等十一個品項,樣本均質後經萃取、鹼水解、除油、離心、取上清液、過濾等過程後再上機進行分析。分析管柱是使用C18管柱,並以同位素內標準品定量,有良好的線性(r2>0.995),同日(Intra-day)和異日(Inter-day)的精密度(Precision)和準確度(Accuracy)之變異皆落在15 %的誤差範圍之內。順丁烯二酸的LOD(Limit of detection)和LOQ(Limit of quantitation)分別為0.5 ng/g和1 ng/g,而反丁烯二酸的LOD和LOQ分別為10 ng/g和25 ng/g。在66個樣本中,有60個樣本測到的順丁烯二酸是可以定量的,有39個樣本測到的反丁烯二酸是可以定量的。
暴露評估的部分是使用貝氏統計馬可夫鏈蒙地卡羅(Bayesian Statistic Markov chain Monte Carlo, BSMCMC)的抽樣方法進行模擬,並利用國家攝食資料庫之攝食量數據估算終生平均每日暴露劑量(Life average daily dose, LADD)和危害商數(Hazard index, HI),結果顯示目前台灣19至65歲成人對於順丁烯二酸和反丁烯二酸的暴露劑量並不會對人體造成不良效應。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMaleic anhydride, mainly used in the manufacture of polyester resins for boats, autos, piping, and electrical goods. However, in 2013, maleic anhydride was found to be illegally adulterated into starch in Taiwanese traditional delicacies such as tapioca balls, Taiwanese meatballs and rice noodles. Once consumed, maleic anhydride will form maleic acid which may cause tubular injury and necrosis in the proximal tubules, primarily in the medullary rays, outer strip of the medulla. In dogs and rats, maleic acid produces a condition analogous to the human Fanconi syndrome, characterized by increasing urinary elimination of glucose, amino acids and other biochemical, resulting from impaired tubular reabsorption of these materials. On the other hand, fumaric acid, which is an isomer of maleic acid, has been used as a food acidulent since 1946. In this case, the aim of this study is to develop an analytical method to determine the total amount of maleic acid and fumaric acid in foods with liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and assess the exposure in adults in Taiwan.
Food samples were collected from supermarkets, chain supermarkets and custom-made beverages stores. Including instant coffee, tapioca starch, rice cake, fish cake, Taiwanese meatballs, tapioca balls, potato starch, chai lai rice flour, jelly bean, vermicelli and rice noodles. Samples were analyzed with C18 column after homogenization, addition of internal standards, base hydrolysis, absorption of lipid and filtration. This method provide good accuracy, precision and linearity. In 66 samples, 60 samples were found quantifiable residue of maleic acid and 39 samples were found quantifiable residue of fumaric acid.
By using the residues and the intake rates collected from National food consumption database, life average daily dose (LADD) and hazard index (HI) were simulated by Bayesian Statistic Markov chain Monte Carlo (BSMCMC). As the result, we can suggest that the exposures to Maleic acid and fumaric acid through food consumption is unlikely to cause adverse health effect for 19-65 years-old adults in Taiwan.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:14:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-R00841012-1.pdf: 2841009 bytes, checksum: 9af6cb430c7bdf2ebeafb97c2c304886 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書
致謝
中文摘要 i
Abstract iii
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 簡介 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 順丁烯二酸 1
1.3 順丁烯二酸酐 4
1.4 反丁烯二酸 6
1.5 分析方法回顧 7
1.5.1 樣本前處理 8
1.5.2 儀器分析 9
1.6 暴露評估 9
1.6.1 暴露劑量推估 10
1.6.2 貝氏統計馬可夫鏈蒙地卡羅模擬法 11
1.6.3 攝食資料庫 11
第二章 研究目的 13
第三章 材料與方法 14
3.1 化學標準品與溶劑 14
3.2 儀器設備及耗材 14
3.3 樣本收集及前處理方法 15
3.4 儀器分析 16
3.4.1 標準溶液配製 16
3.4.2 分析方法開發 17
3.5 質譜條件最佳化 17
3.6 分析方法確效 18
3.6.1 校正曲線的配製及結果 18
3.6.2 偵測極限與定量極限 18
3.6.3 同日及異日之精密度與準確度 19
3.6.4 基質效應、回收率、過程效率 19
3.7 QC樣本,定量與資料分析 20
3.8 暴露評估 20
3.8.1 暴露劑量推估 20
3.8.2 危害商數估算 21
3.8.3 攝食資料庫 21
3.8.4 BSMCMC模式建立 21
3.9 應用軟體 22
第四章 結果與討論 23
4.1 LOD、LOQ、校正曲線、基質效應、回收率、過程效率 23
4.2 同日及異日之精密度與準確度 23
4.3 食品樣本分析結果 23
4.4 LADD和HI 25
第五章 結論與建議 27
參考文獻 61
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title國人順丁烯二酸及反丁烯二酸暴露之初探zh_TW
dc.titleA Pilot Assessment of Maleic Acid and Fumaric Acid
Exposures through Foods
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鄭尊仁(Tsun-Jen Cheng),顏宗海(Tzung-Hai Yen),施偉仲(Wei-Chung Shih)
dc.subject.keyword順丁烯二酸,反丁烯二酸,液相層析串聯式質譜儀,貝氏統計馬可夫鏈蒙地卡羅,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMaleic acid,Fumaric acid,LC-MS/MS,BSMCMC,en
dc.relation.page67
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-08-18
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept職業醫學與工業衛生研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:職業醫學與工業衛生研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
2.77 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved