請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52405完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周楚洋(Chu-Yang Chou) | |
| dc.contributor.author | An-Chi Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉安琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:13:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 林希軒。1987。紫蘇醃漬液利用膜分離技術去鹽之研究。碩士論文。台北:國立台灣大學食品科技研究所。
2. 林冠宏、周楚洋。2010。以海水養殖池厭氧污泥處理含鹽廢水。農業機械學刊 19(4): 75-94。 3. 林軍耀。2011。以厭氧耐鹽菌處理酸菜廢水。碩士論文。台北:國立台灣大學農業機械工程學研究所。 4. 陳麗加。1995。利用金柑醃漬鹽液生產單細胞蛋白質。碩士論文。台北:國立台灣大學園藝學研究所。 5. 張秀霞,張劍杰,單寶來。2011。耐鹽活性污泥馴化及其動力學實驗研究。環境工程學報5(10): 2283-2286。 6. 蔣世安,林高州。2012。工業廢水除氮處理方式探討及經驗分享。中華技術 96: 56-67。 7. 劉安琪。1996。應用固定化細胞技術處理豬糞尿廢水。碩士論文。台北:國立台灣大學農業機械工程學研究所。 8. 劉安琪、周楚洋。2010a。應用固定化細胞於猪糞尿水之厭氧消化。農業機械學刊 19(2): 33-46。 9. 劉安琪、周楚洋。2010b。應用好氣性固定化細胞處理猪糞尿廢水。農業機械學刊 19(3): 47-59。 10. 劉安琪、周楚洋。2014。鹽度對厭氧固定化細胞處理酸菜廢水之影響。農業機械學刊 23(3) (印刷中)。 11. 潘萬德。1986。梅醃漬液利用電透析膜法去鹽之研究。碩士論文。台北:國立台灣大學食品科技研究所。 12. 謝博全。2008。和尚蟹幾丁質皮膜於生物感測的應用。博士論文。台北:國立臺灣大學生農學院生物產業機電工程學系研究所。 13. Al-Sahali, M., and H. Ettouney. 2007. Developments in thermal desalination processes: Design, energy, and costing aspects. Desalination 214: 227-240. 14. Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410. 15. Antileo, C., E. Aspe, C. Zaror, H. urrutia, M. C. Marti, and M. Roeckel. 1997. Differential bacterial growth kinetic and nitrification of fisheries wastewaters containing high ammonium and organic matter concentration by using pure oxygen. Biotechnol. Lett. 19(3): 241-244. 16. APHA/WEF/AWWA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed., eds. L. S. Clesceri, A. E. Greenberg, and A. D. Eaton. Joint Publishers: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. 17. Apte, S. K., and J. Thomas. 1997. Possible amelioration of coastal soil salinity using halotolerant nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria. Plant and Soil 189: 205-211. 18. Aspe´, E., M. C. Martı´, and M. Roeckel. 1997. Anaerobic treatment of fishery wastewater using a marine sediment inoculum. Water. Res. 31(9): 2147-2160. 19. Aspe´, E., M. C. Martı´, A. Jara, and M. Roeckel. 2001. Ammonia inhibition in the anaerobic treatment of fishery effluents. Water Environ. Res. 73(2): 154-164. 20. Benson, D. A., I. Karsch-Mizrachi, K. Clark, D. J. Lipman, J. Ostell, and E. W. Sayers. 2012. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 40(D1): D48-D53. 21. Bult, C. J., O. White, G. J. Olsen, L. Zhou, R. D. Fleischmann, G. G. Sutton, J. A. Blake, L. M. FitzGerald, R. A. Clayton, J. D. Gocayne, A. R. Kerlavage, B. A. Dougherty, J. F. Tomb, M. D. Adams, C. I. Reich, R. Overbeek, E. F. Kirkness, K. G. Weinstock, J. M. Merrick, A. Glodek, J. L. Scott, N. S. Geoghagen, and J. C. Venter. 1996. Complete genome sequence of the methanogenic archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii. Science 273(5278): 1058-1073. 22. Camacho, C., G. Coulouris, V. Avagyan, N. Ma, J. Papadopoulos, K. Bealer, and T. L. Madden. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10: 421. 23. Cayol J. -L., B. Ollivier, B. K. C. Patel, E. Ageron, P. A. D. Grimont, J. Prensier, and J. -L. Garcia. 1995. Haloanaerobium lacusroseus sp. nov., an extremely halophilic fermentative bacterium from the sediments of a hypersaline lake. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45: 790-797. 24. Chen, L. F., and C. S. Gong. 1986. Continuous ethanol production using induced yeast aggregates. Appl. Microbiol. 25: 207-212. 25. Chibata, I., T. Tosa, and T. Sato. 1986. Method of cell immobilization. Manual of industrial microbiology and biotechnology, eds., A. L. Demain. and N. A. Solomon, American Society of Microbiology, Washington, D. C. 26. Choi, M. H., and Y. H. Park. 1999. Growth of Pichia guilliermondii A9, an osmo- tolerant yeast, in waste brine generated from kimchi production. Bioresour. Technol. 70: 231-236. 27. Chou, H. H., and M. H. Holmes. 2001. DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics 17: 1093-1104. 28. Cole, J. R., Q. Wang, E. Cardenas, J. Fish, B. Chai, R. J. Farris, A. S. Kulam-Syed-Mohideen, D. M. McGarrell, T. Marsh, G. M. Garrity, and J. M. Tiedje. 2009. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: D141-D145. 29. Edgar, R. C., B. J. Haas, J. C. Clemente, C. Quince, and R. Knight. 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27: 2194-2200. 30. Engelbrektson, A., V. Kunin, K. C. Wrighton, N. Zvenigorodsky, F. Chen, H. Ochman, and P. Hugenholtz. 2010. Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. The ISME J. 4: 642-647. 31. Gao, W., Z. Cui, Q. Li, G. Xu, X. Jia, and L. Zheng. 2013. Marinobacter nanhaiticus sp. nov., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from the sediment of the South China Sea. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 103(3): 485-491. Doi: 10.1007/s10482-012-9830-z. 32. Guerrero, L., F. Omil, R. Mthdez, and J. M. Lema. 1997. Treatment of saline wastewaters from fish meal factories in an anaerobic filter under extreme ammonia concentrations. Bioresour. Technol. 61: 69-78. 33. Hamady, M., C. Lozupone, and R. Knight. 2010. Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J. 4: 17-27. 34. Hang, Y. D., and N. Jacek. 2003. The rapid degradation of sauerkraut brine by free and immobilized yeast cells. Electronic J. of Polish Agricultural Universities. 6(2) No.13. 35. Huse, S. M., L. Dethlefsen, J. A. Huber, W. D. Mark, D. A. Relman, and L. S. Mitchell. 2008. Exploring microbial diversity and taxonomy using SSU rRNA hypervariable tag sequencing. PLoS Genet 4(12): 10.1371/annotation/3d8a6578- ce56-45aa-bc71- 05078355b851. 36. Ike, A., T. Murakawa, H. Kawaguchi, K. Hirata, and K. Miyamoto. 1999. Photoproduction of hydrogen from raw starch using a halophilic bacterial community. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 88: 72-77. 37. Kugelman, I. J., and P. L. McCarty. 1965. Cation toxicity and stimulation in anaerobic waste treatment. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 37: 97-116. 38. Lai, M. -C., K. R. Sowers, D. E. Robertson, M. F. Roberts, and R. P. Gunsalus. 1991. Distribution of compatible solutes in the halophilic methanogenic archaebacteria. J. Bacteriol. 173(17): 5352-5328. 39. Liaw H. J., and R. A. Mah. 1992. Isolation and characterization of Haloanaerobacter chitinovorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a halophilic, anaerobic, chitinolytic bacterium from a solar saltern. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 260-266. 40. Liu A. C., C. Y. Chou, L. L. Chen, and C. H. Kuo. 2015. Bacterial community dynamics in a swine wastewater anaerobicreactor revealed by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. J. Biotechnol. 194: 124-131. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.11.026. 41. Lefebvre, O., N. Vasudevan, M. Torrijos, K. Thanasekaran, and R. Moletta. 2005. Halophilic biological treatment of tannery soak liquor in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 39: 1471-1480. 42. Lefebvre, O., and R. Moletta. 2006. Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: A literature review. Water Res. 40: 3671-3682. 43. Lefebvre, O., N. Vasudevan, M. Torrijos, K. Thanasekaran, and R. Moletta. 2006. Anaerobic digestion of tannery soak liquor with an aerobic post-treatment. Water Res. 40: 1492-1500. 44. McCarty, P. L. 1964. Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals-part one: chemistry and microbiology. Public Works 95(9): 107-112. 45. McGhee, T. J. 1991. Water Supply and Sewerage. 6th Ed., pp.258-259. NJ:McGraw-Hill, Inc. 46. Ochman, H., M. Worobey, C. -H. Kuo, J. -B. N. Ndjango, M. Peeters, B. H. Hahn, and P. Hugenholtz. 2010. Evolutionary relationships of wild hominids recapitulated by gut microbial communities. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000546. 47. Omil F., R. J. Me´ndez, and J. M. Lema. 1995a. Characterization of biomass from a pilot plant digester treating saline wastewater. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 63: 384-392. 48. Omil F., R. J. Me´ndez, and J. M. Lema. 1995b. Anaerobic treatment of saline wastewaters under high sulphide and ammonia content. Bioresour. Technol. 54: 269-278. 49. Patrick H. D., and H. Ochman. 2012. Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity. The ISME J. 6: 183-194. 50. Price, M. N., P. S. Dehal, and A. P. Arkin. 2010. FastTree 2 - approximately maximumlikelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5(3), e9490. 51. Ravot G., M. Magot, B. Ollivier, B. K. C. Patel, E. Ageron, P.A.D. Grimont, P. Thomas, and J. -L. Garcia. 1997. Haloanaerobium congolense sp. nov., an anaerobic, moderately halophilic, thiosulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacterium from an African oil field. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 147(1): 81-88. 52. Röling, W. F. M., and H. W. Verseveld. 1996. Characterization of Tetragenococcus halophila populations in Indonesian soy mash (kecap) fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 1203-1207. 53. Sanger, F., and A. R. 1975. Coulson. A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 94(3):441-448. 54. Shelomi, M., W. -S. Lo, L. S. Kimsey, and C. -H. Kuo. 2013. Analysis of the gut microbiota of walking sticks (Phasmatodea). BMC Res. Notes 6: 368. 55. Tanemura, K., K. Kida, Ikbal, J. Matsumoto, and Y. Sonoda. 1994. Anaerobic treatment of wastewater with high salt content from a pickled-plum manufacturing process. Ferment. Bioeng. 77(2): 188-193. 56. Tsai C. -R., J. -L. Garcia, B. K. C. Patel, J. -L. Cayol, L. Baresi, and R. A. Mah. 1995. Haloanaerobium alcaliphilum sp. nov., an anaerobic moderate halophile from the sediments of Great Salt Lake, Utah. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. l45: 301-307. 57. Wang, Q., G. M. Garrity, J. M. Tiedje, and J. R. Cole. 2007. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 5261-5267. 58. Woese, C., and G. Fox. 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74(11): 5088-5090. 59. Woese, C., O. Kandler, and M. Wheelis. 1990. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87(12): 4576-4579. 60. Woolard, C. R., and R. L. Irvine. 1994. Biological treatment of hypersaline wastewater by a biofilm of halophilic bacteria. Water Environ. Res. 66: 230-235. 61. Yang P. Y., T. Ma, T. S. See, and N. Nitisoravut. 1994. Applying entrapped mixed microbial cell techniques for biological wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 29(10-11): 487-495. 62. Yoon, J. H., D. Y. Shin, I. G. Kim, K. H. Kang, and Y. H. Park. 2003. Marinobacter litoralis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from sea water from the East Sea in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53: 563-568. Doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02363-0. 63. Youssef, N., C. S. Sheik, L. R. Krumholz, F. Z. Najar, B. A. Roe, and M. S. Elshahed. 2009. Comparison of species richness estimates obtained using nearly complete fragments and simulated pyrosequencing-generated fragments in 16S rRNA gene-based environmental surveys. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75(16): 5227-5236. 64. Yu Z. T., R. García-González, F. L. Schanbacher, and M. Morrison. 2008. Evaluations of different hypervariable regions of archaeal 16S rRNA genes in profiling of methanogens by archaea-specific PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74(3): 889-893. 65. Zeikus J. G., P. W. Hegge, T. E. Thompson, T. J. Phelps, and T. A. Langworthy. 1983. Isolation and description of Haloanaerobium praevalens gen. nov. and sp. nov., an obligately anaerobic halophile common to Great Salt Lake sediments. Curr. Microbiol. 9: 225-234. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52405 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究為探討厭氧處理高鹽分的酸菜加工廢水生產甲烷的鹽耐受度,結合固定化技術與厭氧消化程序,設置包埋式混合厭氧反應槽(Anaerobically entrapped mixed microbial cells reactor, AnEMMCR);同時運用多源基因體序列分析方法(次世代及Sanger定序),以瞭解不同處理時槽中菌相的變化情形。實驗時使用河口底泥馴養的菌種,酸菜廢水則來自大埤的酸菜專業區。本研究共進行兩階段的實驗,第一階段 S1-S6 的 6 個試驗由原廢水的 26% 鹽度逐步降低,測試可明顯產甲烷的鹽耐受度;第二階段則進行較長時間的操作測試,S7-S10 的 4 個試驗是以第一階段所得的鹽耐受度操作在不同的有機負荷時觀察反應槽的表現;S11 則是以 10% 的鹽度及 HRT 10 天進行比較試驗。實驗結果顯示,可明顯產氣的最大鹽耐受度為 15%,有 63% 的 COD 去除率以及 0.013-0.032 L CH4/L/d 的甲烷產率;而鹽度 15% S7-S10 的長時間操作測試,COD 去除率介於 57.9-63.3%,甲烷含量平均為 39%,最高可達 41%;而在鹽度降至 10%、HRT 10 天及有機負荷為 1.0 g COD/L/d的 S11 比較試驗則有最佳的表現,可達到所有試驗中最大的 COD 去除率、氣體產率、甲烷產率及甲烷含量,分別為 68.52%、0.122 L/L/d、0.067 L CH4/L/d 及 54.88%。菌相分析結果則顯示在 S7-S11 試驗穩態時,細菌類占絕大部分,Chromohalobacter 及Halanaerobium 為主要優勢菌群,而在甲烷產率最大的 S10 及 S11 試程,發現存在甲烷古生菌Methanosarcina 及嗜鹽古生菌Halobacterium,其相對比例分別為 2.75% 及 2.25%。又Halanaerobium 比例在53-55% 時,可明顯產氣,而當其大於 75% 時(S9 試驗), pH、產氣量、甲烷比例及甲烷產率皆明顯下降。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | An anaerobically entrapped mixed microbial cells reactor (AnEMMCR) which integrated the technology of immobilization and anaerobic digestion was installed to investigate the tolerable salinity for methane production in anaerobic treatment of saline pickled mustard wastewater. Metagenomic analysis (including next generation and Sanger sequencing) was also adopted to study the dynamic microbial community in the reactor for various tests. Inoculums used were acclimated using the estuary sludge and the pickled mustard wastewater was obtained from a specialized manufacturing center in Da-pi Township, Taiwan. Experiment was classified as two phases in this study. The first phase including 6 tests, S1-S6, was designed to find the tolerable salinity by gradually decreasing the influent salinity from the highest value of 26% of raw pickled mustard wastewater till no apparent methane production. The seconde phase was mainly designed for conducting long term operation experiment. Using the tolerable salanity found in the first phase, S7-S10 tests were conducted to evaluate the reactor performance for different organic loadings. Another test, S11, using 10% salinity influent and an HRT of 10 days, was conducted for comparison with previous tests. Experimental results showed the tolerable salinity for methane production was 15% and 63% of COD removal efficiency and 0.013-0.032 L CH4/L/d were achieved under this condition. For tests S7-S10, the long term operation, COD removal efficiency of
v 57.9-63.3% and an average 39% of methane content with the maximum of 41% were achieved. The comparison test of S11, using 10% salinity influent, 10 days HRT and 1.0 g COD/L/d organic loading rate, possessed the best performance among all tests, with the highest COD removal efficiency, gas production rate, methane production rate, methane content of 68.52%, 0.122 L/L/d, 0.067 L CH4/L/d and 54.88%, respectively. The results of bacterial community analysis showed Chromohalobacter and Halanaerobium were the dominant bacteria in the steady states of S7-S11. In other aspects, archaea were found in the highest two MPR tests, S10 and S11. The relative abundance of Methanosarcina and Halobacterium were 2.75 and 2.25%, respectively. Besides, significant methane production was observed when relative abundance of Halanaerobium was within the range of 53-55%, but dramatically decrease in pH, gas production, methane content and methane production rate were found when it was larger than 75% (in test S9). | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:13:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-D00631001-1.pdf: 2308992 bytes, checksum: b8958f64ff9898f8567c783bb16ffa22 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書
誌謝 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 ix 第一章 前言及研究目的 1 第二章 文獻探討 3 2.1 含鹽廢水之處理 3 2.1.1 熱處理 3 2.1.2 離子交換法(Ion exchange process) 3 2.1.3 膜處理法(Membrane process) 4 2.1.4 生物處理 4 2.2 固定化細胞之探討 9 2.2.1 固定化原理 9 2.2.2 固定化材質 10 2.2.3 固定化細胞之優點 11 2.3 菌相分析 11 2.3.1 簡介 11 2.3.2 生物分類學 12 2.3.3 多源基因體序列分析(Metagenomics Analysis) 13 2.3.4 定序(Sequencing) 14 第三章 研究方法 16 3.1 實驗設計 16 3.2 實驗材料 17 3.2.1 厭氧污泥菌種 17 3.2.2 酸菜廢液 17 3.2.3 固定化細胞 17 3.2.4 菌相分析用 primer 18 3.3 厭氧反應槽設備 18 3.3.1 反應槽主體 18 3.3.2 進出流設備 18 3.3.3 氣體收集與量測裝置 19 3.3.4 恆溫控制系統 19 3.3.5 固定化細胞 20 3.4 菌相分析設備 20 3.5 分析方法 20 3.5.1 水質分析 20 3.5.2 甲烷含量測定 21 3.5.3 樣品前處理與DNA萃取 21 3.5.4 16S rDNA 之 PCR 放大及 454 pyrosequencing 22 3.5.5 次世代定序分析(NGS analysis) 23 3.5.6 傳統Sanger Sequencing方法分析 24 第四章 結果與討論 25 4.1 厭氧污泥特性 26 4.2 S1-S6階段鹽度對pH值、COD、COD去除率、GPR及MPR之影響 26 4.2.1 pH值 26 4.2.2 COD 值 30 4.2.3 COD 去除率 30 4.2.4 氣體產率、甲烷含量及甲烷產率 32 4.3 S7-S11階段鹽度對pH值、COD、COD去除率、GPR及MPR之影響 33 4.3.1 pH值 33 4.3.2 COD值 34 4.3.3 COD去除率 35 4.3.4 氣體產率、甲烷含量及甲烷產率 38 4.4 與其他處理結果之比較 38 4.5 菌相分析結果 41 4.5.1 次世代定序(NGS)結果 41 4.5.2 Sanger Sequencing結果 45 4.6 AnEMMC 反應槽菌相組成與反應槽效能表現之關係 46 第五章 結論與建議 50 參考文獻 52 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 包埋式固定化細胞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 厭氧消化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 次世代定序 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多源基因體方法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 酸菜 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高鹽廢水 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | next generation sequencing | en |
| dc.subject | entrapped mixed microbial cells (EMMC) | en |
| dc.subject | high salinity wastewater | en |
| dc.subject | pickled mustard | en |
| dc.subject | metagenomics | en |
| dc.subject | anaerobic digestion | en |
| dc.title | 高鹽廢水中有機物之厭氧處理-化學及微生物分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Anaerobic Removal of Organics for Hypersaline Wastewater - Chemical and Microbiological Analyses | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 沈韶儀(Shao-Yi Sheen),姜延年(Yan-Nian Jiang),方煒(Wei Fang),李允中(Yeun-Chung Lee) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 厭氧消化,包埋式固定化細胞,高鹽廢水,酸菜,多源基因體方法,次世代定序, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | anaerobic digestion,entrapped mixed microbial cells (EMMC),high salinity wastewater,pickled mustard,metagenomics,next generation sequencing, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 59 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業機電工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生物機電工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.25 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
