Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52229
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor洪茂蔚(Mao-Wei Hung)
dc.contributor.authorBi-Juan Changen
dc.contributor.author張碧娟zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T16:09:55Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-01
dc.date.copyright2015-08-21
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-08-18
dc.identifier.citationReferences
1. Alkebäck, P. and N. Hagelin (2004). Expiration Day Effects of Index Futures and Options: Evidence from a Market with a Long Settlement Period, Applied Financial Economics, 14(6), 385-396.
2. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, Journal of Finance 23, 589-609.
3. Bessembinder, H., J. F. Coughenour , P. J. Seguin, and M. M. Smoller (Winter 1996). Is There a Term Structure of Futures Volatilities? Reevaluating the Samuelson Hypothesis. Journal of Derivatives, 4(2), 45-58.
4. Bharath, S., and Shumway, T. (2008). Forecasting Default with the Merton Distance to Default Model, Review of Financial Studies 21(3), 1339-1369.
5. Bhatt, S. and N. Cakici (1990). Premiums on Stock Index Futures‐Some Evidence. Journal of Futures Markets, 10(4), 367-375.
6. Bhattacharya, U., and Marshall, C. D. (2012). Do They Do It for the Money, Journal of Corporate Finance 18, 92-104.
7. Bollen, N. P. B., and Krepely, V. (2008). Conditional Return Smoothing in the Hedge Fund Industry, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43(2), 267-298.
8. Bühler, W. and A. Kempf (1995). DAX Index Futures: Mispricing and Arbitrage in German Markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 15(7), 833-859.
9. Campbell, J. Y., Hilscher, J., and Szilagyi, J. (2008). In Search of Distress Risk, Journal of Finance 63(6), 2899-2939.
10. Carchano, O. and A. Pardo (2009). Rolling over Stock Index Futures Contracts. Journal of Futures Markets, 29,684-694.
11. Chatrath, A. and R. Cristie-David (Fall 2004). Futures Expiration, Contract Switching, and Price Discovery. Journal of Derivatives, 12(1), 58-72.
12. Chava, S., and Jarrow, R. (2004). Bankruptcy Prediction with Industry Effects, Review of Finance 8(4), 537-569.
13. Chou, H., Li, H., and Yin, X. (2010). The Effects of Financial Distress and Capital Structure on the Work Effort of Outside Directors. Working Paper.
14. Clatworthy, M. A., and Peel, M. J. (2013). The Impact of Voluntary Audit and Governance Characteristics on Accounting Errors in Private Companies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. Forthcoming.
15. Cole, R. A., and Wu, Q. (2010). Is Hazard or Probit more Accurate in Predicting Financial Distress? Evidence from U.S. Bank Failures. Working Paper.
16. Cornell, B. and K. R. French (1983). The Pricing of Stock Index Futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 3(1), 1-14.
17. Cornew, R. W., D. E. Town, and L. D. Crowson (1984). Stable Distributions, Futures Prices, and the Measurement of Trading Performance. Journal of Futures Markets, 4, 531-557.
18. Das, S. R., Duffie, D., Kapadia, N., and Saita, L. (2007). Common Failings: How Corporate Defaults Are Correlated, Journal of Finance 62(1), 93-117.
19. Das, S. R., Freed, L., Geng, G., and Kapadia, N. (2006). Correlated Default Risk, Journal of Fixed Income Fall, 7-32.
20. Debasish, S. S (Dec. 2010). Investigating Expiration Day Effects in Stock Index Futures in India. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 1(1), 9-19.
21. Dyl, E. A. and E. D. Maberly (1986). The Daily Distribution of Changes in the Price of Stock Index Futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 6, 513-521.
22. Dzhabarov, C. and W. T. Ziemba (Spring 2010). Do Seasonal Anomalies Still Work? Journal of Portfolio Management, 36(3), 93-104.
23. Fabozzi, F. J., Chen, R., Hu, S., and Pan, G. (2010). Tests of the Performance of Structural Models in Bankruptcy Prediction, Journal of Credit Risk 6(2), 37-78.
24. Geiss, G. (1995). Distortion-Free Futures Price Series. Journal of Futures Markets, 15, 805-831.
25. Grammatilos, T. and A. Saunders (1986). Futures Price Variability: A Test of Maturity and Volume Effects. Journal of Business, 59, 319-330.
26. Hassan, T., M. Shamsher, M. Ariff and A. Md Nassir (2007). Stock Index Futures Prices and the Asian Financial Crisis. International Review of Finance, 7(3-4), 119-141.
27. Hensel, C. and W. Ziemba (Spring 1996). Investment Results from Exploiting Turn-of-the-Month Effects. Journal of Portfolio Management, 22(3), 17–23.
28. Herbst, A. F., D. D. Kare, and S. C. Caples (1989). Hedging Effectiveness and Minimum Risk Hedge Ratios in the Presence of Auto Correlation: Foreign Currency Futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 9, 185-197.
29. Hill, J. M. Alpha as a Net Zero-Sum Game (Summer 2006). Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(4), 24-32.
30. Hilscher, J., and Wilson, M. (2011). Credit Ratings and Credit Risk. Working Paper.
31. Jacobs, B. I. and K. N. Levy (May 1999). Alpha Transport with Derivatives. Journal of Portfolio Management, 25(5), 55-60.
32. Jorion, P. and L. Roisenberg (Winter 1993). Synthetic International Diversification. Journal of Portfolio Management, 19(2), 65–74.
33. Junkus, J. C. (1986). Weekend and Day of the Week Effects in Returns on Stock Index Futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 4, 397-407.
34. Karolyi, K. (Winter 1996). Stock Market Volatility around Expiration Days in Japan. Journal of Derivatives, 4(2), 23-43.
35. Karpoff, J. M. (Fall 1988). Costly Short Sales and the Correlation of Returns with Volume. Journal of Financial Research, 11, 173-188.
36. Kealhofer, S. (1999). Credit Risk and Risk Management, AIMR conference proceedings, 80-94.
37. Kealhofer, S. (2003). Quantifying Credit Risk I: Default Prediction, Financial Analysis Journal 59(1), 30-44.
38. Keenan, S. C., and Sobehart, J. R. (1999). Performance Measures for Credit Risk Models, Moody’s Investors Service, Moody's Risk Management Services, Research Report # 1-10-10-99.
39. Keenan, S. C., Hamilton, D. T., and Berthault, A. (2000). Historical Default Rates of Corporate Bond Issuers, 1920-1999, Moody’s Investors Service.
40. King, G., and Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data, Political Analysis 9, 137-163.
41. Kotter, J., and Lel, U. (2010). Friends or Foes? Target Selection Decisions of Sovereign Wealth Funds. Working Paper.
42. Kung, E. and L. Pohlman (Spring 2004). Portable Alpha. Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(3), 78-87.
43. Lafuente, J., and A. Novales (2003). Optimal Hedging under Departures from the Cost-of-carry Valuation: Evidence from the Spanish Stock Index Futures Market. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 1053-1078.
44. Lein, D., T. K. Tse, and A. K. C. Tsui (2002). Evaluating the Hedging Performance of the Constant-Correlation GARCH Model. Applied Financial Economics, 12(11), 791-798.
45. Lennox, C. (1999). Identifying Failing Companies: A Reevaluation of the Logit, Probit and DA Approaches, Journal of Economics and Business 51, 347-364.
46. Lucia, J. and A. Pardo (2010). On Measuring Hedging and Speculative Activities in Futures Markets from Volume and Open Interest Data. Applied Economics, 42, 1549- 1557.
47. Ma, K., M. Mercer, and M. Walker (1992). Rolling over Futures Contracts: A Note. Journal of Futures Markets, 12(2), 203-217.
48. Merrick, J. J. (1989). Early Unwinding and Rollovers of Stock Index Futures Arbitrage Programs: Analysis and Implications for Predicting Expiration Day Effects. Journal of Futures Markets, 9(2), 101-111.
49. Merton, R. C. (1974). On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, Journal of Finance 29(2), 449-470.
50. Milonas, N. and T. Henker (2001). Price Spread and Convenience Yield Behaviour in the International Oil Market. Applied Financial Economics, 11, 23-36.
51. Modest, D. M. and M. Sundaresan (1983). The Relationship between Spot and Futures Prices in Stock Index Futures Markets: Some Preliminary Evidence. Journal of Futures Markets, 3(1), 15-41.
52. Rendleman, R. J. (1993). A Reconciliation of Potentially Conflicting Approaches to Hedging with Futures. Advances in Futures and Options Research, 6, 81-92.
53. Samuelson, P (Spring 1965). Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly. Industrial Management Review, 6, 41-49.
54. Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting Bankruptcy More Accurately: A Simple Hazard Model, Journal of Business 74(1), 101-124.
55. Sobehart, J. R., Keenan, S. C., and Stein, R. M. (2000). Benchmarking Quantitative Default Risk Models: A Validation Methodology, Moody's Risk Management Services.
56. Sobehart, J. R., Stein, R. M., Mikityanskaya, V., and Li, L. (2000). Moody's Public Firm Risk Model: A Hybrid Approach to Modeling Short Term Default Risk, Moody's Investors Service.
57. Sohn, S. Y., and Kim, H. S. (2007). Random Effects Logistic Regression Model for Default Prediction of Technology Credit Guarantee Fund, European Journal of Operational Research 183, 472-478.
58. Tang, Z. (2009). The Empirical Study on the Credit Risk Discrimination of Listed SMEs Based on the Distance to Default, IEEE Xplore, 799-803.
59. Vassalou, M., and Xing, Y. (2004). Default Risk in Equity Returns, Journal of Finance 59, 831–868.
60. Vazza, D., and Kraemer, N. (2010). Default, Transition, and Recovery: 2009 U.S. Corporate Default Study and Rating Transitions, Retrieved September 07, 2010, from http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245218127257.
61. Vazza, D., Aurora, D., and Kraemer, N. (2010). Default, Transition, and Recovery: 2009 Annual Global Corporate Default Study and Rating Transitions, Retrieved September 07, 2010, from http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/articles/en/us/?assetID=1245207201119.
62. Westgaard, S., and Wijst, N. (2001). Default Probabilities in a Corporate Bank Portfolio: A Logistic Model Approach, European Journal of Operational Research 135, 338-349.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52229-
dc.description.abstract本論文以兩個財務實證研究為主。第一個主題為股票指數期貨合約的轉倉效果分析,第二個主題是資本市場中的地雷股分析。
  針對股票指數期貨合約的轉倉效果分析,本文提出一個新方法來衡量股票指數期貨合約的轉倉報酬,並分析轉倉效果。由於期貨合約到期時若轉倉進入下一個合約,使用傳統的轉倉報酬衡量方法,並未考慮價格跳動、及合約不一致的問題,有必要加以修正。本文所提出的新的衡量方式,是在轉倉日計算報酬時,以將轉入的合約價,取代目前將到期的合約價,並將總報酬拆解為轉倉效果與資本利得兩部份來分析。在轉倉日的選擇上,本文也比較了最後交割日、到期日前七個交易日、及到期當月第一個交易日的轉倉效果,同時也考慮了理論與實際價格的差異,及觀察便利殖利率的變化。本文所觀測的市場為美國 S&P500、德國 DAX、及台灣 TAIEX 股票指數期貨合約,發現在最後交割日轉倉的收益最大,並由價格到期收斂的路徑,也發現這三個市場有很顯著的到期日效果。
  而本文第二個主題為財務危機公司之研究。資本市場中,財務陷入危機的公司,猶如戰場上的地雷一般,不容易預測,但會造成極大傷害,所以有必要針對資本市場中的地雷股進行更進一步的分析與預測。本文以違約距離模型(distance-to-default model)與稀有性羅吉斯模型(rare event logit models)來預測公開之市場資料,並以cumulative accuracy profiles 及 receiver operating characteristic 兩個指標衡量預估結果,發現稀有性羅吉斯模型表現均優於違約距離模型。本文所觀察的樣本為美國 S&P 500 有信用評等紀錄的上市公司資料,總計由 1986 年 01 月到 2012 年 12 月,共包含 2,138 家公司,或 271,912 個公司月份,其中 444 家為財務危機公司。在預估上,本文設定各時點違約機率最高的 6% 的公司為可能有問題的公司,並以貝氏定理的後驗機率(Bayesian posterior probability)來評估,結果發現此計算方式能更早一步捕捉到 40-60% 的準確度,甚至有時可高達 70%。因此,本文認為稀有性羅吉斯模型是個可用來預估財務危機公司的好方法,且此項預估至少可提早三年就能有效觀測使用。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is mainly focus on two empirical finance studies: the rollover effects in stock index futures contracts, and searching for the distressed firms in equity markets.
For research of the rollover effects in stock index futures contracts, this dissertation proposes a new method for evaluating stock index futures contracts rolling returns with the rollover effect analysis. Due to the limited lifespan of futures contract, traditional return series construction may be distorted by the price jump and contract inconsistency problems. We amend it by replacing the rollover price of the nearest-to-maturity to the next-to-maturity price at the rollover day, and decomposing the total return to the rollover effect and the capital gain or loss. Three rolling points, the delivery day, the seventh day, and the first day of the expiration month, are considered. Differences between the actual and theoretical futures prices are also discussed. Convenience yields for the near close and next-to-maturity futures are also explored. We investigate S&P500, DAX, and TAIEX stock index futures, and find that with the risk-return and rollover effect analysis, rolling into the next contract on the delivery day is often a better choice. By the convergent paths of the convenience yields we observe that expiration day effects are very apparent in all three markets.
The second topic is on the distressed firms research and prediction. Distressed firms in equity markets are like landmines in the battlefields due to their undetectability and devastating effects. This dissertation is concerned with distressed firms forecasting by the distance to default and rare event logit models via public available data. Comparing these two models by Cumulative Accuracy Profiles and Receiver Operating Characteristic curves, we conclude that the rare event logit model performs better than the distance to default model. The data contains U.S.-listed firms on the S&P 500 for the period January 1986 to December 2012, including 2,138 companies and 271,912 firm months, with 444 distressed firms. We set the dynamic thresholds as the last 6% of firms based on the historical cross-section distress rates. Upon Bayesian posterior probability examination, the rare event logit model shows about 40% to 60% affinity with S&P Domestic Long Term Issuer Credit Rating records on average, and the rate increases to 70% in some situations. We conclude that the rare event logit model can be a good warning indicator of distress in firms at least three years ahead.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:09:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-D95724014-1.pdf: 1029304 bytes, checksum: 87d0e90c8928d5e696aef7e0a42eb323 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents<Contents>:
1. Introduction 1
2. Rollover Effects in Stock Index Futures Contracts 4
2.1 Abstract 4
2.2 Introduction 4
2.3 Calculating Rollover Returns 9
2.4 Data and Empirical Results 17
2.5 Conclusion 41
3. Searching for Landmines in Equity Markets 43
3.1 Abstract 43
3.2 Introduction 43
3.3 Methodology 48
3.4 Data and Empirical Results 60
3.5 Conclusion 76
4. Conclusions 78
References 80
<Tables>:
Table 2.1 Delivery time and data time period for stock index futures contracts 18
Table 2.2 Actual and theoretical quarterly returns on the del, 7th, 1st day 19
Table 2.3 Actual and theoretical quarterly returns on the del, 7th, 1st day on TAIEX SIF for two different periods 27
Table 2.4 Paired-sample t-test for actual and theoretical values 29
Table 2.5 Paired-sample t-test p-value for the equality on the del, 7th, 1st day 30
Table 2.6 Regression of quarterly mispricing on risk-free rates and dividend yields 31
Table 2.7 Rollover effect and convenience yields on the del, 7th, 1st day 34
Table 2.8 Regression of rollover effects on risk-free rates and dividend yields 37
Table 2.9 Quarterly dividends time effect on TAIEX SIF 40
Table 2.10 Dividend effect with separate times on TAIEX SIF 40
Table 3.1 Classification table of model predicted probabilities 59
Table 3.2 Descriptive statistics 63
Table 3.3 Variables descriptive statistics 65
Table 3.4 Average CAP AR, ROC AR, 1-α, β, likelihood ratio, posterior probability 68
Table 3.5 Average of rare event logit (REL) regression results 77
<Figures>:
Figure 2.1 Roll yield of rolling a futures contract with a spot equity 13
Figure 2.2 Actual quarterly returns on the del, 7th, 1st day 21
Figure 2.3 Theoretical quarterly returns on the del, 7th, 1st day 22
Figure 2.4 Mispricing, interest rate, and dividend yield on the del, 7th, 1st day 32
Figure 2.5 Convenience yields on the del, 7th, 1st day 35
Figure 2.6 Rollover effect, interest rate, and dividend yield on the del, 7th, 1st day 38
Figure 3.1 Histogram of monthly distress probability 55
Figure 3.2 Cumulative Accuracy Profiles (CAP) curves 57
Figure 3.3 Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves 58
Figure 3.4 In-sample yearly average distress probability and recession periods 67
Figure 3.5 Average Cumulative Accuracy Profiles curve accuracy rate 69
Figure 3.6 Average Receiver Operating Characteristic curve accuracy rate 70
Figure 3.7 Average (1-alpha) and beta 71
Figure 3.8 Average posterior probability 72
Figure 3.9 Posterior probability 74
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject稀有性羅吉斯模型zh_TW
dc.subject股票指數期貨zh_TW
dc.subject轉倉效果zh_TW
dc.subject到期日效果zh_TW
dc.subject違約距離模型zh_TW
dc.subjectdistance to default model (DTD)en
dc.subjectrare event logit model (REL)en
dc.subjectstock index futures (SIF)en
dc.subjectrollover effecten
dc.subjectexpiration day effecten
dc.title財務金融研究zh_TW
dc.titleEssays in Financeen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張森林,莊文議,岳夢蘭,張傳章,徐之強
dc.subject.keyword股票指數期貨,轉倉效果,到期日效果,違約距離模型,稀有性羅吉斯模型,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordstock index futures (SIF),rollover effect,expiration day effect,distance to default model (DTD),rare event logit model (REL),en
dc.relation.page86
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-08-19
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.01 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved