請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51775完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 徐麗芬(Lie-Fen Shyur) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jia-En Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王加恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:49:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-18 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Payne CM, Knott BC, Mayes HB, Hansson H, Himmel ME, Sandgren M, Ståhlberg J, Beckham GT: Fungal cellulases. Chemical Reviews 2015, 115(3):1308-1448. Lübeck M: Cellulases. Methods in Molecular Biology 2018, 1796. Tonozuka T, Yoshida M, Takeuchi M: Chapter 9 - Enzymes for cellulosic biomass conversion. In: Research Approaches to Sustainable Biomass Systems. Boston: Academic Press; 2014: 225-242. Davies G, Henrissat B: Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure 1995, 3(9):853-859. Couturier M, Bennati-Granier C, Urio MB, Ramos LP, Berrin J-G: Fungal enzymatic degradation of cellulose. In: Green Fuels Technology: Biofuels. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016: 133-146. Kracher D, Forsberg Z, Bissaro B, Gangl S, Preims M, Sygmund C, Eijsink VGH, Ludwig R: Polysaccharide oxidation by lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase is enhanced by engineered cellobiose dehydrogenase. The FEBS Journal 2020, 287(5):897-908. Kracher D, Ludwig R: Cellobiose dehydrogenase: An essential enzyme for lignocellulose degradation in nature – A review. Die Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment 2016, 67(3):145-163. Quinlan RJ, Teter S, Xu F: 7 - Development of cellulases to improve enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Bioalcohol Production. Woodhead Publishing; 2010: 178-201. Rosgaard L, Pedersen S, Langston J, Akerhielm D, Cherry JR, Meyer AS: Evaluation of minimal Trichoderma reesei cellulase mixtures on differently pretreated barley straw substrates. Biotechnology Progress 2007, 23(6):1270-1276. Znameroski EA, Coradetti ST, Roche CM, Tsai JC, Iavarone AT, Cate JH, Glass NL: Induction of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in Neurospora crassa by cellodextrins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012, 109(16):6012-6017. Kuraain M, Väljamäe P: Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2010, 286:169 - 177. Fox JM, Levine SE, Clark DS, Blanch HW: Initial- and processive-cut products reveal cellobiohydrolase rate limitations and the role of companion enzymes. Biochemistry 2012, 51(1):442-452. Bommarius AS, Katona A, Cheben SE, Patel AS, Ragauskas AJ, Knudson K, Pu Y: Cellulase kinetics as a function of cellulose pretreatment. Metabolic Engineering 2008, 10(6):370-381. Jalak J, Kurašin M, Teugjas H, Väljamäe P: Endo-exo synergism in cellulose hydrolysis revisited. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2012, 287(34):28802-28815. Eriksson T, Karlsson J, Tjerneld F: A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) and endoglucanase I (Cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2002, 101(1):41-60. Cruys-Bagger N, Tatsumi H, Ren GR, Borch K, Westh P: Transient kinetics and rate-Limiting steps for the processive cellobiohydrolase Cel7A: effects of substrate structure and carbohydrate binding domain. Biochemistry 2013, 52(49):8938-8948. Cruys-Bagger N, Elmerdahl J, Praestgaard E, Tatsumi H, Spodsberg N, Borch K, Westh P: Pre-steady-state kinetics for hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose by cellobiohydrolase Cel7A. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2012, 287(22):18451-18458. Christensen SJ, Kari J, Badino SF, Borch K, Westh P: Rate-limiting step and substrate accessibility of cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Trichoderma reesei. The FEBS Journal 2018, 285(23):4482-4493. Taylor LE, Knott BC, Baker JO, Alahuhta PM, Hobdey SE, Linger JG, Lunin VV, Amore A, Subramanian V, Podkaminer K: Engineering enhanced cellobiohydrolase activity. Nature Communications 2018, 9(1):1-10. Sørensen TH, Windahl MS, McBrayer B, Kari J, Olsen JP, Borch K, Westh P: Loop variants of the thermophile Rasamsonia emersonii Cel7A with improved activity against cellulose. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2017, 114(1):53-62. Zong Z, Li Q, Hong Z, Fu H, Cai W, Chipot C, Jiang H, Zhang D, Chen S, Shao X: Lysine mutation of the claw-arm-like loop accelerates aatalysis by cellobiohydrolases. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141(36):14451-14459. Kurašin M, Väljamäe P: Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2011, 286(1):169-177. Zhang Y-HP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR: Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnology Advances 2006, 24(5):452-481. Velleste R, Teugjas H, Väljamäe P: Reducing end-specific fluorescence labeled celluloses for cellulase mode of action. Cellulose 2010, 17(1):125-138. Horn SJ, Sørlie M, Vårum KM, Väljamäe P, Eijsink VGH: Chapter five - Measuring processivity. In: Methods in Enzymology. vol. 510: Academic Press; 2012: 69-95. Kuhad RC, Deswal D, Sharma S, Bhattacharya A, Jain KK, Kaur A, Pletschke BI, Singh A, Karp M: Revisiting cellulase production and redefining current strategies based on major challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016, 55:249-272. Christensen SJ, Krogh KBRM, Spodsberg N, Borch K, Westh P: A biochemical comparison of fungal GH6 cellobiohydrolases. Biochemical Journal 2019, 476(15):2157-2172. Zhou J, Wang Y-H, Chu J, Luo L-Z, Zhuang Y-P, Zhang S-L: Optimization of cellulase mixture for efficient hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by statistically designed experiments. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100(2):819-825. Inoue H, Decker SR, Taylor LE, Yano S, Sawayama S: Identification and characterization of core cellulolytic enzymes from Talaromyces cellulolyticus (formerly Acremonium cellulolyticus) critical for hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2014, 7(1):1-13. Gao D, Chundawat SPS, Krishnan C, Balan V, Dale BE: Mixture optimization of six core glycosyl hydrolases for maximizing saccharification of ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreated corn stover. Bioresource Technology 2010, 101(8):2770-2781. Abdel-Hamid AM, Solbiati JO, Cann IKO: Chapter one - Insights into lignin degradation and its potential industrial applications. In: Advances in Applied Microbiology. vol. 82: Academic Press; 2013: 1-28. Rodríguez-Couto S: Industrial and environmental applications of white-rot fungi. Mycosphere 2017, 8(3):456-466. Bentil JA, Thygesen A, Mensah M, Lange L, Meyer AS: Cellulase production by white-rot basidiomycetous fungi: solid-state versus submerged cultivation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018, 102(14):5827-5839. Busk PK, Lange M, Pilgaard B, Lange L: Several genes encoding enzymes with the same activity are necessary for aerobic fungal degradation of cellulose in nature. PLOS ONE 2014, 9(12):e114138. Martinez D, Challacombe J, Morgenstern I, Hibbett D, Schmoll M, Kubicek CP, Ferreira P, Ruiz-Duenas FJ, Martinez AT, Kersten P et al: Genome, transcriptome, and secretome analysis of wood decay fungus Postia placenta supports unique mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106(6):1954-1959. Floudas D, Binder M, Riley R, Barry K, Blanchette RA, Henrissat B, Martínez AT, Otillar R, Spatafora JW, Yadav JS et al: The paleozoic origin of enzymatic lignin decomposition reconstructed from 31 fungal genomes. Science 2012, 336(6089):1715-1719. Manavalan A, Adav SS, Sze SK: iTRAQ-based quantitative secretome analysis of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Journal of Proteomics 2011, 75(2):642-654. Machado AS, Valadares F, Silva TF, Milagres AMF, Segato F, Ferraz A: The secretome of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trametes versicolor grown in microcrystalline cellulose and use of the enzymes for hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2020, 8:826. Metreveli E, Kachlishvili E, Singer SW, Elisashvili V: Alteration of white-rot basidiomycetes cellulase and xylanase activities in the submerged co-cultivation and optimization of enzyme production by Irpex lacteus and Schizophyllum commune. Bioresource Technology 2017, 241:652-660. Zhou S, Herpoël‐Gimbert I, Grisel S, Sigoillot JC, Sergent M, Raouche S: Biological wheat straw valorization: Multicriteria optimization of Polyporus brumalis pretreatment in packed bed bioreactor. MicrobiologyOpen 2018, 7(1):e00530. Yoon LW, Ang TN, Ngoh GC, Chua ASM: Fungal solid-state fermentation and various methods of enhancement in cellulase production. Biomass and Bioenergy 2014, 67:319-338. Philippoussis A, Diamantopoulou P, Papadopoulou K, Lakhtar H, Roussos S, Parissopoulos G, Papanikolaou S: Biomass, laccase and endoglucanase production by Lentinula edodes during solid state fermentation of reed grass, bean stalks and wheat straw residues. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2011, 27(2):285-297. Dong XQ, Yang JS, Zhu N, Wang ET, Yuan HL: Sugarcane bagasse degradation and characterization of three white-rot fungi. Bioresource Technology 2013, 131:443-451. Elisashvili V, Penninckx M, Kachlishvili E, Tsiklauri N, Metreveli E, Kharziani T, Kvesitadze G: Lentinus edodes and Pleurotus species lignocellulolytic enzymes activity in submerged and solid-state fermentation of lignocellulosic wastes of different composition. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99(3):457-462. Regina M, Broetto F, Giovannozzi-Sermanni G, Marabotini R, Peranni C: Influence of stationary and bioreactor cultivation on Lentinula edodes (berk) pegler lignocellulolitic activity. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 2008, 51:223-233. Elisashvili V, Kachlishvili E, Penninckx M: Effect of growth substrate, method of fermentation, and nitrogen source on lignocellulose-degrading enzymes production by white-rot basidiomycetes. Journal of Industrial Microbiology Biotechnology 2008, 35(11):1531-1538. Jensen MS, Fredriksen L, MacKenzie AK, Pope PB, Leiros I, Chylenski P, Williamson AK, Christopeit T, Østby H, Vaaje-Kolstad G: Discovery and characterization of a thermostable two-domain GH6 endoglucanase from a compost metagenome. PLOS ONE 2018, 13(5):e0197862. Kraulis J, Clore GM, Nilges M, Jones TA, Pettersson G, Knowles J, Gronenborn AM: Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. A study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry 1989, 28(18):7241-7257. Christensen SJ, Badino SF, Cavaleiro AM, Borch K, Westh P: Functional analysis of chimeric TrCel6A enzymes with different carbohydrate binding modules. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection 2020, 32(9):401-409. Sammond DW, Payne CM, Brunecky R, Himmel ME, Crowley MF, Beckham GT: Cellulase linkers are optimized based on domain type and function: insights from sequence analysis, biophysical measurements, and molecular simulation. PLOS ONE 2012, 7(11):e48615-e48615. Payne CM, Resch MG, Chen L, Crowley MF, Himmel ME, Taylor LE, Sandgren M, Ståhlberg J, Stals I, Tan Z et al: Glycosylated linkers in multimodular lignocellulose-degrading enzymes dynamically bind to cellulose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013, 110(36):14646-14651. Rouvinen J, Bergfors T, Teeri T, Knowles JK, Jones TA: Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei. Science 1990, 249(4967):380-386. Thompson AJ, Heu T, Shaghasi T, Benyamino R, Jones A, Friis EP, Wilson KS, Davies GJ: Structure of the catalytic core module of the Chaetomium thermophilum family GH6 cellobiohydrolase Cel6A. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Structural Biology 2012, 68(8):875-882. Claeyssens M, Tomme P, Brewer CF, Hehre EJ: Stereochemical course of hydrolysis and hydration reactions catalysed by cellobiohydrolases I and II from Trichoderma reesei. FEBS Letters 1990, 263(1):89-92. Teeri TT: Crystalline cellulose degradation: new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends in Biotechnology 1997, 15(5):160-167. Beckham GT, Ståhlberg J, Knott BC, Himmel ME, Crowley MF, Sandgren M, Sørlie M, Payne CM: Towards a molecular-level theory of carbohydrate processivity in glycoside hydrolases. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 27:96-106. Koivula A, Ruohonen L, Wohlfahrt G, Reinikainen T, Teeri TT, Piens K, Claeyssens M, Weber M, Vasella A, Becker D et al: The active site of cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Trichoderma reesei: the roles of aspartic acids D221 and D175. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2002, 124(34):10015-10024. Yamaguchi S, Sunagawa N, Tachioka M, Igarashi K, Samejima M: Thermostable mutants of glycoside hydrolase family 6 cellobiohydrolase from the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Journal of Applied Glycoscience 2020, 67(3):79-86. Wang X-J, Peng Y-J, Zhang L-Q, Li A-N, Li D-C: Directed evolution and structural prediction of cellobiohydrolase II from the thermophilic fungus Chaetomium thermophilum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2012, 95(6):1469-1478. Zhou Q, Ji P, Zhang J, Li X, Han C: Characterization of a novel thermostable GH45 endoglucanase from Chaetomium thermophilum and its biodegradation of pectin. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 2017, 124(3):271-276. Voutilainen SP, Puranen T, Siika-Aho M, Lappalainen A, Alapuranen M, Kallio J, Hooman S, Viikari L, Vehmaanperä J, Koivula A: Cloning, expression, and characterization of novel thermostable family 7 cellobiohydrolases. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2008, 101(3):515-528. Xu R, Teng F, Zhang C, Li D: Cloning of a gene encoding β-glucosidase from Chaetomium thermophilum CT2 and Its expression in Pichia pastoris. Microbial Physiology 2011, 20(1):16-23. Han C, Li W, Hua C, Sun F, Bi P, Wang Q: Enhancement of catalytic activity and thermostability of a thermostable cellobiohydrolase from Chaetomium thermophilum by site-directed mutagenesis. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2018, 116:691-697. Heinzelman P, Komor R, Kanaan A, Romero P, Yu X, Mohler S, Snow C, Arnold F: Efficient screening of fungal cellobiohydrolase class I enzymes for thermostabilizing sequence blocks by SCHEMA structure-guided recombination. Protein Engineering, Design Selection 2010, 23(11):871-880. Wu I, Arnold FH: Engineered thermostable fungal Cel6A and Cel7A cellobiohydrolases hydrolyze cellulose efficiently at elevated temperatures. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2013, 110(7):1874-1883. Marie B, Luquet G, Pais De Barros JP, Guichard N, Morel S, Alcaraz G, Bollache L, Marin F: The shell matrix of the freshwater mussel Unio pictorum (Paleoheterodonta, Unionoida) Involvement of acidic polysaccharides from glycoproteins in nacre mineralization. The FEBS Journal 2007, 274(11):2933-2945. Rahman MS, Fernando S, Ross B, Wu J, Qin W: Endoglucanase (EG) activity assays. In: Cellulases. Springer; 2018: 169-183. Sharma HK, Qin W, Xu CC: Cellobiohydrolase (CBH) activity assays. In: Cellulases. Springer; 2018: 185-199. Edelheit O, Hanukoglu A, Hanukoglu I: Simple and efficient site-directed mutagenesis using two single-primer reactions in parallel to generate mutants for protein structure-function studies. BMC Biotechnology 2009, 9(1):1-8. Almagro Armenteros JJ, Tsirigos KD, Sønderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H: SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nature Biotechnology 2019, 37(4):420-423. Gupta R, Jung E, Brunak S: Prediction of N-glycosylation sites in human proteins. NetNGlyc 1.0 Server. In.: DTU Bioinformatics; 2004. Steentoft C, Vakhrushev SY, Joshi HJ, Kong Y, Vester-Christensen MB, Schjoldager KT, Lavrsen K, Dabelsteen S, Pedersen NB, Marcos-Silva L et al: Precision mapping of the human O-GalNAc glycoproteome through SimpleCell technology. The EMBO Journal 2013, 32(10):1478-1488. Letunic I, Bork P: 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Research 2017, 46(D1):D493-D496. Teeri TT, Lehtovaara P, Kauppinen S, Salovuori I, Knowles J: Homologous domains in Trichoderma reesei cellulolytic enzymes: gene sequence and expression of cellobiohydrolase II. Gene 1987, 51(1):43-52. Yoshida M, Sato K, Kaneko S, Fukuda K: Cloning and transcript analysis of multiple genes encoding the glycoside hydrolase family 6 enzyme from Coprinopsis cinerea. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 2009, 73(1):67-73. Li Y-L, Li H, Li A-N, Li D-C: Cloning of a gene encoding thermostable cellobiohydrolase from the thermophilic fungus Chaetomium thermophilum and its expression in Pichia pastoris. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2009, 106(6):1867-1875. Nierman WC, Pain A, Anderson MJ, Wortman JR, Kim HS, Arroyo J, Berriman M, Abe K, Archer DB, Bermejo C et al: Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 2005, 438(7071):1151-1156. Sahasrabudhe NA, Ranjekar PK: Cloning of the cellulase gene from Penicillium funiculosum and its expression in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiology Letters 1990, 54(1-3):291-293. Tempelaars CA, Birch PR, Sims PF, Broda P: Isolation, characterization, and analysis of the expression of the cbhII gene of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1994, 60(12):4387-4393. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K: MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2018, 35(6):1547-1549. Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, Heer FT, de Beer TA P, Rempfer C, Bordoli L et al: SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Research 2018, 46(W1):W296-W303. Tachioka M, Nakamura A, Ishida T, Igarashi K, Samejima M: Crystal structure of a family 6 cellobiohydrolase from the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology Communications 2017, 73(7):398-403. Hui JPM, White TC, Thibault P: Identification of glycan structure and glycosylation sites in cellobiohydrolase II and endoglucanases I and II from Trichoderma reesei. Glycobiology 2002, 12(12):837-849. Gusakov AV, Dotsenko AS, Rozhkova AM, Sinitsyn AP: N-Linked glycans are an important component of the processive machinery of cellobiohydrolases. Biochimie 2017, 132:102-108. Kołaczkowski BM, Schaller KS, Sørensen TH, Peters GHJ, Jensen K, Krogh KBRM, Westh P: Removal of N-linked glycans in cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei reveals higher activity and binding affinity on crystalline cellulose. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2020, 13(1):1-13. Amore A, Knott BC, Supekar NT, Shajahan A, Azadi P, Zhao P, Wells L, Linger JG, Hobdey SE, Vander Wall TA et al: Distinct roles of N- and O-glycans in cellulase activity and stability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2017, 114(52):13667-13672. Adney WS, Jeoh T, Beckham GT, Chou Y-C, Baker JO, Michener W, Brunecky R, Himmel ME: Probing the role of N-linked glycans in the stability and activity of fungal cellobiohydrolases by mutational analysis. Cellulose 2009, 16(4):699-709. Nakamura A, Tasaki T, Ishiwata D, Yamamoto M, Okuni Y, Visootsat A, Maximilien M, Noji H, Uchiyama T, Samejima M et al: Single-molecule imaging analysis of binding, processive movement, and dissociation of cellobiohydrolase Trichoderma reesei Cel6A and its domains on crystalline cellulose. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2016, 291(43):22404-22413. Vuong TV, Wilson DB: Processivity, synergism, and substrate specificity of Thermobifida fusca Cel6B. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2009, 75(21):6655-6661. Gu Y, Zheng F, Wang Y, Su X, Bai Y, Yao B, Huang H, Luo H: Characterization of two thermophilic cellulases from Talaromyces leycettanus JCM12802 and their synergistic action on cellulose hydrolysis. PLOS ONE 2019, 14(11):e0224803. Wang H-C, Chen Y-C, Huang C-T, Hseu R-S: Cloning and characterization of a thermostable and pH-stable cellobiohydrolase from Neocallimastix patriciarum J11. Protein Expression and Purification 2013, 90(2):153-159. Gao L, Wang F, Gao F, Wang L, Zhao J, Qu Y: Purification and characterization of a novel cellobiohydrolase (PdCel6A) from Penicillium decumbens JU-A10 for bioethanol production. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102(17):8339-8342. Boonvitthya N, Bozonnet S, Burapatana V, O’Donohue MJ, Chulalaksananukul W: Comparison of the heterologous expression of Trichoderma reesei endoglucanase II and cellobiohydrolase II in the yeasts Pichia pastoris and Yarrowia lipolytica. Molecular Biotechnology 2013, 54(2):158-169. Limam F, Chaabouni SE, Ghrir R, Marzouki N: Two cellobiohydrolases of Penicillium occitanis mutant Pol 6: Purification and properties. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 1995, 17(4):340-346. Zhou Q, Jia J, Ji P, Han C: A novel application potential of GH6 cellobiohydrolase CtCel6 from thermophilic Chaetomium thermophilum for gene cloning, heterologous expression and biological characterization. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2017, 19(2). Huang H-C, Qi L-H, Chen Y-C, Tsai L-C: Crystal structures of the GH6 Orpinomyces sp. Y102 CelC7 enzyme with exo and endo activity and its complex with cellobiose. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Structural Biology 2019, 75(12). Poidevin L, Feliu J, Doan A, Berrin J-G, Bey M, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Record E, Heiss-Blanquet S: Insights into exo- and endoglucanase activities of family 6 glycoside hydrolases from Podospora anserina. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2013, 79(14):4220-4229. Bernardi AV, Gerolamo LE, de Gouvêa PF, Yonamine DK, Pereira LMS, de Oliveira AHC, Uyemura SA, Dinamarco TM: LPMO AfAA9_B and cellobiohydrolase AfCel6A from A. fumigatus boost enzymatic saccharification activity of cellulase cocktail. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021, 22(1):276. Tomme P, Van Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, Van Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, Knowles J, Teeri T, Claeyssens M: Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. European Journal of Biochemistry 1988, 170(3):575-581. Kari J, Andersen M, Borch K, Westh P: An inverse michaelis–menten approach for interfacial enzyme kinetics. ACS Catalysis 2017, 7(7):4904-4914. Baramee S, Teeravivattanakit T, Phitsuwan P, Waeonukul R, Pason P, Tachaapaikoon C, Kosugi A, Sakka K, Ratanakhanokchai K: A novel GH6 cellobiohydrolase from Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus B-6 and its synergistic action on cellulose degradation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2017, 101(3):1175-1188. Bommarius AS, Sohn M, Kang Y, Lee JH, Realff MJ: Protein engineering of cellulases. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 29:139-145. Contreras F, Pramanik S, Rozhkova AM, Zorov IN, Korotkova O, Sinitsyn AP, Schwaneberg U, Davari MD: Engineering robust cellulases for tailored lignocellulosic degradation cocktails. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21(5):1589. Payne CM, Bomble YJ, Taylor CB, McCabe C, Himmel ME, Crowley MF, Beckham GT: Multiple functions of aromatic-carbohydrate interactions in a processive cellulase examined with molecular simulation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2011, 286(47):41028-41035. Lavigne JA, Hill CM, Tremblay A, St-Pierre P, Tomashek JJ: Cellulase variants with reduced inhibition by glucose. In: US8012734B2. U.S.; 2011. Scott BR, St-Pierre P, Lavigne JA, Masri N, White TC, Tomashek JJ: Cellulase enzymes having a modified linker and reduced lignin binding. In: US9279112B2. U.S.; 2010. Zhang S, Irwin DC, Wilson DB: Site‐directed mutation of noncatalytic residues of Thermobifida fusca exocellulase Cel6B. European Journal of Biochemistry 2000, 267(11):3101-3115. Ai Y-C, Wilson DB: Mutation and expression of N233C-D506C of cellulase Cel6B from Thermobifida fusca in Escherichia coli. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2002, 30(6):804-808. Ito Y, Ikeuchi A, Imamura C: Advanced evolutionary molecular engineering to produce thermostable cellulase by using a small but efficient library. Protein Engineering, Design Selection 2013, 26(1):73-79. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51775 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 白腐真菌是一種已知能有效降解植物木質纖維素的微生物。白腐真菌會外泌許多種類的酵素,可應用於生物能源,生物修復,生物製漿等領域。在先前的研究中,我們從福山植物園中鑑定出一株Lentinus sp.真菌,並在其培養液中發現其具有分泌(半)纖維素水解酶之能力。利用轉錄體分析和PCR技術,一種預測為外切型纖維素水解酶的基因(命名為LsCBHII),被全長選殖出來。這個論文研究的目的是鑑定此LsCBHII 酵素的生化與催化功能。重組之LsCBHII蛋白藉由Ni-NTA親和性樹脂和Q Sepharose陰離子交換樹脂管柱層析純化。純化之重組LsCBHII蛋白之分子量估計為64.6 kDa,並藉由SDS-PAGE與LC-MS/MS分析驗證具醣基化。酵素動力學研究顯示,重組LsCBHII之最適溫度與pH值分別為50°C和pH 4.5(以Avicel為受質)或60°C和pH 5.0(以RAC為受質)。重組LsCBHII在酸性環境(pH 4.0至5.0)中顯示出較高的穩定性,其t1 / 2在70°C為6.8分鐘,60°C為22.7分鐘,55°C為35.4分鐘,在50°C則為144分鐘。重組LsCBHII對水不溶解之1,4-β-D-葡聚醣(Avicel和RAC)和水溶性之1,3-1,4-β-D-葡聚醣(lichenan)表現出高催化活性,但對修飾過的1,4-β-D-葡聚醣基質(CMC)表現出低催化活性。以Avicel(RAC)為受質之kcat, Km和kcat/Km分別為2.20 s-1 (7.32 s-1)、23.80±1.36 mg / mL(6.83 ± 0.69 mg / mL)和0.092 mL/mg/s(1.072 mL/mg/s)。我們利用來自Phanerochaete chrysosporium的外切型纖維素水解酶II Cel6A(PDBID:5XCY,相似性78.8%)為模板預測LsCBHII可能之3D蛋白質結構。推測LsCBHII具有2個域結構:碳水化合物結合模塊(CBM)與扭曲的β/α桶狀催化區域,兩區域結構由高靈活性的多肽連接。此外,本研究建構且鑑定了LsCBHII的三個突變體(N102A,K167A和T416K),但僅觀測到具醣基化修飾的Asn102上的突變會影響LsCBHII的熱穩定性和對Avicel的親和力。綜合以上所述,這篇研究首次鑑定出一種新型的真菌外切型纖維素水解酶II,它較大多數已發表的真菌CBHII在水解不溶性纖維素時表現出更高的活性,顯示出此酵素極具在工業應用上的潛力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | White-rot fungi are a group of microorganisms known to effectively degrade plant lignocelluloses. White-rot fungi produce a wide-spectrum of enzymes, which can be used in bioenergy, bioremediation, biopulping, among other industrial applications. In our previous study, a fungus Lentinus sp. identified from Fushan botanical garden was detected with (hemi-)cellulose-like activity in its culture broth. We then used transcriptomics analysis and PCR technique to isolate a full-length cellobiohydrolase II gene designated LsCBHII. This thesis study aimed to characterize the biochemical and catalytic function of LsCBHII encoded protein. The full-length LsCBHII gene was subcloned and overexpressed in the Pichia pastoris host cell system. The pure recombinant LsCBHII protein was obtained by Ni-NTA affinity column chromatography and Q Sepharose anion exchange column chromatography. The recombinant LsCBHII protein was shown glycosylated, with an estimated molecular mass 64.6 kDa, verified by SDS-PAGE and LC-MS/MS analyses. Recombinant LsCBHII exhibited optimal temperature and optimal pH at 50°C and pH 4.5 with Avicel, and 60°C and pH 5.0 with RAC as the substrate. Recombinant LsCBHII displayed higher stability in the acidic environment (pH 4.0 to 5.0), and its t1/2 was determined at 70°C for 6.8 min, at 60°C for 22.7 min, at 55°C for 35.4 min, and at 50°C for 144 min. Recombinant LsCBHII displayed high catalytic activity on the insoluble form of 1,4-β-D-glucan (Avicel and RAC) and 1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan (lichenan) but low activity on modified 1,4-β-D-glucan (CMC). The kcat, Km and kcat/Km were 2.20 ± 0.04 (7.32 ± 0.45) s-1, 23.80 ± 1.36 (6.83 ± 0.69) mg/mL and 0.092 (1.072) mL/mg/s with Avicel (RAC) as substrate. The hypothetical 3D structure of LsCBHII was predicted using a protein template of cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Phanerochaete chrysosporium (PDBID: 5XCY, sequence identity 78.8%). LsCBHII is predicted to contain 2 domains in its protein structure, i.e., a carbohydrate binding module (CBM) and a distorted β/α barrel catalytic domain connected by a flexible linker. Three mutants (N102A, K167A, and T416K) of LsCBHII were constructed and characterized. Only mutation on the predicted glycosylated residue Asn102 affected thermostability and cellulose (Avicel) binding affinity of LsCBHII. Taken together, this study is the first to identify a novel fungal cellobiohydrolase II exhibited higher hydrolytic activity towards insoluble cellulose than most of the published fungal CBHII, which shows a great potential in industrial application. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:49:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0502202114482800.pdf: 3904913 bytes, checksum: 01ced4e94f93f25c96e647865d1d44cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I 謝誌 II 摘要 III Abstract IV Abbreviations IX Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1. Cellulose degrading enzymes 1 2. Highlights of current cellobiohydrolases (CBHs) research 2 3. Cellulosic degradation enzyme from white-rot fungi 3 4. Structural features of fungal cellobiohydrolase II 4 5. Current research on protein engineering of cellobiohydrolase II 5 6. Objectives and significance of this study 6 Chapter 2 Materials and Methods 7 1. Chemicals and enzymes 7 2. LsCBHII gene subcloning in Escherichia coli 7 2.1 Transformation of full-length LsCBHII gene in E coli DH5α 7 2.2 Plasmid amplification and purification 7 3. Protein expression in Pichia pastoris X33 host cell system 8 3.1 Conformation of pPICZαB-LsCBHII plasmid 8 3.2 Transformation of pPICZαB-LsCBHII plasmid DNA into P pastoris X33 cells 8 3.3 Overexpression of recombinant LsCBHII 9 4. Recombinant protein purification 10 5. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis 10 6. Protein deglycosylation 11 7. Cellulase activity assay 12 7.1 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method 12 7.2 4-Hydroxybenzhydrazide (PAHBAH) method 12 7.3 Endoglucanase activity assay using carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) as the substrate 13 7.4 Cellobiohydrolase activity assay using Avicel as the substrate 13 7.5 Cellobiohydrolase activity assay using regenerated amorphous cellulose (RAC) as the substrate 14 7.6 Kinetics study of LsCBHII 15 8. Site-directed mutagenesis 16 9. Primary protein sequence analysis 16 10. Secondary structure measurement with circular dichroism (CD) 17 11. Homologous modeling analysis 17 Chapter 3 Results 18 1. Sequence comparison of CBHII from Lentinus sp (LsCBHII) and characterized cellobiohydrolase IIs 18 2. Overexpression of recombinant LsCBHII in P pastoris X33 host cell system 19 3. Purification of recombinant LsCBHII protein using Ni-NTA affinity column chromatography and protein deglycosylation analysis 20 4. Purification of recombinant LsCBHII protein using Q Sepharose anion exchange column chromatography 21 5. Kinetics study of recombinant LsCBHII 22 5.1 Optimal temperature and optimal pH for the enzymatic activity of recombinant LsCBHII 22 5.2 Thermostability and pH stability of recombinant LsCBHII 23 5.3 Substrate specificities and cation effect on the enzymatic activity of LsCBHII 23 5.4 Kinetic properties of recombinant LsCBHII 24 6. Predicted 3D structure of LsCBHII by homology modeling 25 7. Site-directed mutagenesis of LsCBHII 25 8. Kinetics analysis of LsCBHII mutants 26 9. Specific activity and thermostability of LsCBHII mutants 27 Chapter 4 Discussion 29 Chapter 5 Conclusions and future works 34 References 35 Figures Fig 1 DNA and primary protein sequences of LsCBHII 47 Fig 2 Sequence alignment and phylogenetic relationship of LsCBHII and other cellobiohydrolase IIs from different fungal origins 49 Fig 3 Overexpression of recombinant LsCBHII in P pastoris X33 host cell system 50 Fig 4 Purification of recombinant LsCBHII protein using Ni-NTA affinity column chromatography 51 Fig 5 Purification of recombinant LsCBHII protein using Q Sepharose anion exchange column chromatography 52 Fig 6 Optimal temperature and optimal pH for the enzymatic activity of recombinant LsCBHII using Avicel or RAC as the substrate at optimal temperature and pH 53 Fig 7 Thermostability and pH stability of recombinant LsCBHII 54 Fig 8 Substrate saturation curve of LsCBHII using Avicel or RAC as the substrate at optimal temperature and pH 55 Fig 9 Substrate saturation curve of LsCBHII using Avicel or RAC cellulose as the substrate at room temperature 56 Fig 10 Predicted 3D structure of LsCBHII by homology 57 Fig 11 Site-directed mutagenesis of LsCBHII 58 Fig 12 Biochemical characterization of LsCBHII mutants 59 Fig 13 Substrate saturation curve of LsCBHII mutants 60 Tables Table 1. Protein engineering research on cellobiohydrolase II enzymes 61 Table 2. Protein sequence identity in various cellobiohydrolase IIs 62 Table 3. Purification table of recombinant LsCBHII 64 Table 4. Substrate specificities of recombinant LsCBHII 65 Table 5. Mono- and divalent cation effect on recombinant LsCBHII activity 65 Table 6. Kinetic parameters of LsCBHII at optimal pH and temperature 66 Table 7. Kinetic parameters of LsCBHII at room temperature 66 Table 8. Comparison of kinetic properties of LsCBHII with other GH6 CBHIIs 67 Table 9. Comparison of biochemical and kinetic properties of fungal cellobiohydrolase IIs 68 Table 10. PCR primers for site-directed mutagenesis 69 Table 11. Comparison of the kinetic parameters of recombinant wild-type and mutant forms of LsCBHII 69 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | Lentinus sp. | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 纖維素酶 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 纖維素降解 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 外切葡聚糖酶 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 外切型纖維素水解酵素II | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 白腐真菌 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Lentinus sp. | en |
| dc.subject | exoglucanase | en |
| dc.subject | cellulose degradation | en |
| dc.subject | white-rot fungus | en |
| dc.subject | cellobiohydrolase II | en |
| dc.subject | cellulase | en |
| dc.title | 白腐真菌Lentinus sp.之新型外切型纖維素水解酵素II之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Elucidation of a novel cellobiohydrolase II from a white-rot fungus Lentinus sp. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 孟孟孝(Meng-Hsiao Meng),梁博煌(Po-Huang Liang),黃慶璨(Ching-Tsan Huang),蔡麗珠(Li-Chu Tsai) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee-orcid | ,梁博煌(0000-0003-1207-5256) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Lentinus sp.,白腐真菌,外切型纖維素水解酵素II,外切葡聚糖酶,纖維素降解,纖維素酶, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Lentinus sp.,white-rot fungus,cellobiohydrolase II,exoglucanase,cellulose degradation,cellulase, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 69 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100589 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生化科技學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 生化科技學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0502202114482800.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.81 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
