請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5144
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林以正(Yi-Cheng Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jennifer Weng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 翁若珊 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-15T17:52:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-17 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-15T17:52:32Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adler, N. E., & Snibbe, A. C. (2003). The Role of Psychosocial Processes in Explaining the Gradient Between Socioeconomic Status and Health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 119-123.
Caprara, G. V, Alessandri, G., & Eisenberg, N. (2012). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1289-1303. Caruso, E. M., Vohs, K. D., Baxter, B., & Waytz, A. (2013). Mere Exposure to Money Increases Endorsement of Free-Market Systems and Social Inequality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 301-306. Chan, W., McCrae, Robert R., Rogers, D. L., Weimer, A. A., Greenberg, D. M., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Rater Wealth Predicts Perceptions of Outgroup Competence. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(6), 597-603. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61-149. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J., . . . Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 1-33. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will Money Increase Subjective Well-Being?: A Literature Review and Guide to Needed Research. Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119-169. Dijksterhuis, A., Chartrand, T. L., & Aarts, H. (2007). Effects of priming and perception on social behavior and goal pursuit. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Dwairy, M., & Achoui, M. (2010). Adolescents-Family Connectedness: A First Cross-Cultural Research on Parenting and Psychological Adjustment of Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(1), 8-15. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77-83. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. Gino, F., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Time, money, and morality. Psychological Science, 25(2), 414-421. Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 142-155. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410-422. Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social Class, Contextualism, and Empathic Accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716-1723. Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social Class, Solipsism, and Contextualism: How the Rich Are Different From the Poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572. Kusserow, A. S. (1999). De-Homogenizing American Individualism: Socializing Hard and Soft Individualism in Manhattan and Queens. Ethos, 27(2), 210-234. Lareau, A. (2003) Unequal childhoods. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Lea, S. E. G., & Webley, P. (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 161-+. Mogilner, C. (2010). The Pursuit of Happiness: Time, Money, and Social Connection. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1348-1354. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771-784. Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Cote, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(11), 4086-4091. Price, R. H., Choi, J. N., & Vinokur, A. D. (2002). Links in the chain of adversity following job loss: How financial strain and loss of personal control lead to depression, impaired functioning, and poor health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(4), 302-312. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106(4), 835-845. Tang, T. L. P. (1995). The Development of a Short Money Ethic Scale - Attitudes Toward Money and Pay Satisfaction Revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(6), 809-816. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154-1156. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 208-212. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect - The Panas Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. Wiley, A. R., Rose, A. J., Burger, L. K., & Miller, P. J. (1998). Constructing Autonomous Selves Through Narrative Practices: A Comparative Study of Working-Class and Middle-Class Families. Child Development, 69(3), 833-847. Zaleskiewicz, T., Gasiorowska, A., Kesebir, P., Luszczynska, A., & Pyszczynski, T. (2013). Money and the fear of death: The symbolic power of money as an existential anxiety buffer. Journal of Economic Psychology, 36(0), 55-67. Zhou, X., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The Symbolic Power of Money: Reminders of Money Alter Social Distress and Physical Pain. Psychological Science, 20(6), 700-706. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5144 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自我充足假設(Self-sufficiency hypothesis)指出金錢概念的觸發會造成個體的獨立以及與他人拉開距離的傾向(Vohs, Mead, & Goode, 2006)。儘管過去很多研究探討引發金錢概念的行為後果,卻沒有研究探討到金錢概念對社會知覺的影響,特別是金錢是如何影響人如何知覺他人。刻板內容模型(stereotype content model; Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002)指出有兩個基本的社會知覺向度—溫暖與能力—或許可以作為金錢概念如何引發行為後果的解釋機制。此外,本研究也檢驗以不同方法觸發金錢概念是否會影響金錢對社會知覺影響的效果。在接下來的三個研究中,我們會將觸發金錢概念的操弄方法由外顯到內隱做程度上的改變。受試者將被隨機分派到金錢觸發組或是控制組,在操弄之後會評估對不同目標(有錢人、窮人、老人、中產階級)的溫暖和能力知覺。結果顯示,與控制組相比,金錢觸發組傾向知覺這四個知覺目標是比較沒有能力的,但在溫暖知覺向度上沒有差異。結果也顯示,越內隱的金錢觸發方式,得到的效果越穩定。最後,我們也看到能力知覺能夠中介金錢觸發到利社會行為的效果。根據BIAS map(Cuddy, Fiske, Glick., 2008), 低能力知覺會引發被動傷害行為,而這也能解釋為什麼金錢觸發後的個體傾向忽略他人。金錢觸發只對能力知覺產生影響而非溫暖知覺的結果意涵將在最後進行討論。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Self-sufficiency hypotheses suggest that the priming with money induces independence and distance from others (Vohs et al., 2006). Although there has been a great deal of research on the behavioral consequences of money, there is no research about the effect of money on social perception, especially how money may shape the ways people perceive others. The stereotype content model (Fiske et al., 2002), which distinguishes two basic dimensions of social perception -- warmth and competence--provides an explanatory mechanism for the money priming effect on behavioral consequences. In addition, we test whether different ways to activate the concept of money changes its effect on social perception. In three studies, we change the ways to prime money from explicit to implicit. Participants were assigned to either the money-primed or the control group, and rate their perceptions of different targets (the rich, poor, elderly, and middle class) as competent and warm. First, results showed that compared to the control group, the money primed group tended to perceive all the four targets as less competent, but there was no difference on warmth dimension. Second, results showed that the more implicit money priming is, the more stable its effect. Third, there is an indirect effect of money on prosociality through perceived competence. According to BIAS map model (Cuddy et al., 2008) low competence judgment elicits passive-harming behaviors, which might explain why people primed with money tend to neglect others. Implications of the dissociation of money priming effect on competence dimension but not warmth dimension are discussed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-15T17:52:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01227112-1.pdf: 2454312 bytes, checksum: 037b84a43d9d8d18a972f520a8996ad8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Money Priming and Behavioral Consequences 1 1.2 Stereotype Content Model and BIAS map 4 1.3 Money Priming and Social Perception 5 1.4 Money Priming and Perceived Competence 7 1.5 Money Priming and Perceived Warmth 9 1.6 From Explicit to Implicit 9 1.7 Overview of the Studies 12 2 Experiment 1 12 2.1 Method 13 2.2 Results and Discussion 15 3 Experiment 2 17 3.1 Method 18 3.2 Results and Discussion 19 4 Experiment 3 21 4.1 Method 22 4.2 Results and Discussion 23 5 General Discussion 28 References 32 Appendix 37 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 金錢預示效果對能力知覺的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of Money Priming on Perceived Competence | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 朱瑞玲(Ruey-Lin Chu),李怡真(Yi-Chen Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 金錢預示,社會知覺,利社會行為, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Money priming,social perception,prosociality, | en |
dc.relation.page | 39 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf | 2.4 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。