Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 農業經濟學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5130
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陸怡蕙(Yir-Hueih Luh)
dc.contributor.authorMin Han Tsaien
dc.contributor.author蔡旻翰zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-15T17:52:20Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-17
dc.date.available2021-05-15T17:52:20Z-
dc.date.copyright2014-08-17
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014-08-12
dc.identifier.citation一、中文部分
王明妤、林玠恒、方治文、凃安蓉、張甄育、林倩如,2011。「農民持續採用有
機耕種行為意圖之研究:以計畫行為理論為基礎」,『台灣農學會報』。12
卷,1 期,68-88。
吳明峰,2011。「影響農民投入有機農業行為意象之研究」。博士論文,國立中
山大學公共事務管理研究所。
花蓮區農業改良場,1996。花蓮區農情資訊,52 期。花蓮:花蓮區農業改良場。
花蓮區農業改良場,1995。花蓮區農情資訊,51 期。花蓮:花蓮區農業改良場。
花蓮區農業改良場,1995。花蓮區農情資訊,50 期。花蓮:花蓮區農業改良場。
花蓮區農業改良場,1995。花蓮區農情資訊,43 期。花蓮:花蓮區農業改良場。
花蓮區農業改良場,1995。花蓮區農情資訊,40 期。花蓮:花蓮區農業改良場。
耕耘臺灣•農業大世紀:農業紀實。耕耘臺灣•農業大世紀編輯委員會,2011。
臺北:行政院農業委員會。
許世宏、劉惠國、柳婉郁,2010。「台南縣後壁鄉稻農對有機稻米看法之分析」,
『作物、環境與生物資訊』。7 卷,1 期,21–36。
許禎元,2004。「社會科學信度與效度的檢定及其關聯性」,『醒吾學報』。27 卷,
1-23。
郭華仁,2012。「有機農業的必然與實現-典範移轉與立法」,『台灣國際法季刊』。
9 卷,4 期,81–111。
陸怡蕙、黃芳玫、張竣翔、簡毓寧,2010。「創新技術採用之影響因素研究-以
香蕉生產者之知識累積與資訊取得為例」。『農業經濟叢刊』,16 卷,1 期,
33-77。
103陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵,2005。多變量分析方法-統計軟體應用。
臺北:五南。
陳志綸,2007。「有機農業生產空間形構過程之研究:以花蓮縣富里鄉銀川米為
例」。碩士論文,國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所。
陳玠廷,2007。「臺灣有機農業之鄉村性論述-以富里鄉羅山村為例」。碩士論
文,國立臺灣大學農業推廣學研究所。
陳源俊、劉興榮、沈聰明、謝依霖,2010。「認知、情感與行為因素影響有機產
業群聚發展之研究-以富里鄉居民為例」。花蓮區農業改良場研究彙報。28
期,61–76。
黃翠瑛,2009。「影響農民採用有機農產品標章因素之研究」。碩士論文,國立
嘉義大學生物事業管理學系。
黃俊英、林震岩,1994。SAS 精析與實例。臺北:華泰文化。
顏月珠,2006。無母數統計方法。臺北:三民書局。
劉建煌,2011。「苗栗縣苑裡鎮慣行、有機稻農的生產行為、農業典範及有機產
銷態度之比較」。碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。
二、英文部分
Abadie, A., Imbens, G. W., 2005. Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators
for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), pp. 235-267.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., 1970. The Prediction of Behavior from Attitudinal and
Normative Variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6(4), pp.
466-487.
Ajzen, I., 1971. Attitudinal vs. Normative Messages: An Investigation of the
Differential Effects of Persuasive Communications on Behavior. Sociometry,
34(2), pp. 263-280.
104Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., 1980. Understanding Attitues and Predicting Social Behavior.
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., 1985. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Kuhl,
J., Beckmann, J., eds., Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, pp. 11-39.
Heiderberg: Springer.
Ajzen, I., Madden, T. J., 1986. Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes,
Intentions, and Perceived Behavior Control. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 22(5), pp.453-474.
Ajzen, I., 1988. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Milton Keynes: Open
Univerity Press.
Ajzen, I., 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organization Bahavior and
Human Decision Processes, 50(2), pp. 179-211.
Ajzen, I., 2012. The Theory of Planned Behavior. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski,
A. W., Higgins, E. T., eds., Theories of Social Psychology. London: SAGE.
Allison, P. D., 2008. Convergence Failures in Logistic Regression. Paper presented at
SAS Global Forum 2008. San Antonio, Texas. March 16-19.
Argiles, J. M., Brown, N. D., 2010. A Comparison of the Economic and
Environmental Performances of Conventional and Organic Farming: Evidence
from Financial Statements. Agricultural Economics Review, 11(1), pp. 69-86.
Austin, P., C., 2011. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the
Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behavioral
Research, 46(3), pp. 399-424.
Baerenklau, K. A., 2005. Toward an Understanding of Technology Adoption: Risk,
Learning, and Neighborhood Effects. Land Economics, 81(1), pp. 1-19.
Beedell, J., Rehman, T., 2000. Using Social-Psychology Models to Understand
105Farmers’ Conservation Behavior. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(1), pp. 117-127.
Best, H., 2008. Organic Agriculture and the Conventionalization Hypothesis: A Case
Study from West Germany. Agriculture and Human Values, 25(1), pp. 95-106.
Blackman, A., Naranjo, M. A., 2012. Does Eco-Certification Have Environmental
Benefits? Organic Coffee in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 83(1), pp.
58-66.
Bolwig, S., Gibbon, P., Jones, S., 2009. The Economics of Smallholder Organic
Contract Farming in Tropical Africa. World Development, 37(6), pp. 1094-1104.
Boyd Jr, H. W., Westfall, R., Stasch, S. F., 1989. Marketing Research: Text and Cases.
Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin Inc.
Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T., 1999. Analysis of the Determinants of Adoption of
Organic Hortucultural Techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics,
50(1), pp. 47-63.
Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T., 2003. Modelling the Adoption of Organic
Horticultural Technology in the UK Using Duration Analysis. The Australian
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(1), pp. 29-54.
Cochrane, W. W., 1958. Farms Prices: Myth and Reality. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Darnhofer, I., Schneeberger, W., Freyer, B., 2005. Converting or Not Converting to
Organic Farming in Austria: Farming Types and Their Rationale. Agriculture
and Human Values, 22(1), pp. 39-52.
Dehejia, R. H., Wahba, S., 2002. Propensity Score-Matching Methods for
Nonexperimental Causal Studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1),
pp. 151-161.
De Cock, L., 2005. Determinants of Organic Farming Conversion. Paper presented at
1066th International Congress of the EAAE. Copenhagan, Denmark, August 24-27.
Dimera, E., Skuras, D., 2003. Adoption of Agricultural Innovations as a Two-Stage
Partial Observability Process. Agricultural Economics, 28(3), pp. 187-196.
Dixit, A. K., Robert, S., P., 1994. Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Falcon, W. P., 1970. The Green Revolution: Generations of Problems. American
Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52(5), pp. 698-710.
Feder, G., 1980. Farm Size, Risk Aversion and the Adoption of New Technology
under Uncertainty. Oxford Economic Papers, 32(2), pp. 263-282.
Feder, G., O’Mara, G. T., 1982. On Information and Innovation Diffusion: A
Bayesian Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(1), pp.
141-145.
Feder, G., Just, R. E., Zilberman, D., 1985. Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in
Developing Countries: A Survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change,
33(2). pp. 255-298.
Feder, G., Umali, D. L., 1993. The Adoption of Agricultural Innovations: A Review,
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 43(3-4), pp. 215-239
Finger, R., Lehmann, B., 2012. Adoption of Agri-Environmental Programmes in
Swiss Crop Production. EuroChoices, 11(1), pp. 28-33. The Agricultural
Economics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An
Introductory to Theory and Research. Massachusate: Addison-Wesley.
Flaten, O., Lien, G., Ebbesvik, M.M Koesling, M., Valle, P., 2006. Do the New
Organic Producers Differ from the ‘Old-Guard’? Empirical Results from
Norwegian Dairy Farming. Renewable Agriculture and Food System, 21(3), pp.
107174-182.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), World Health
Organization (WHO), 2011. Guidelines for the Production, Processing,
Labelling and Marketing of Organically Produced Foods. CAC/GL
32-1999-Rev.1-2001. FAO and WHO Codex, Alimentarius Commission, Rome,
Italy.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2011.
Socio-Economic Analysis of Conservation Agriculture in Southern Africa.
Network Paper 2. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Frondel, M., Schmidt, C. M., 2005. Evaluating Environmental Programs: The
Perspective of Modern Evaluation Research. Ecological Economics, 55(4), pp.
515-526.
Gardebroek, C., 2006. Comparing Risk Attitudes of Organic and Non-Organic
Farmers with a Bayesian Random Coefficient Model. European Review of
Agricultural Economics, 33(4), pp. 485–510.
Genius, M., Pantzios, C. J., Tzouvelekas, V., 2006. Information Acquisition and
Adoption of Organic Farming Practices. Journal of Agricultural and Resource
Economics, 31(1), pp. 93-113.
Greenstone, M., Gayer, T., 2009. Quasi-experiment and Experimental Approaches to
Environmental Economics. Ecological Economics, 57(1), pp. 21-44.
Gujarati, D. N., Porter, D. C., 2009. Basic Econometrics, 5e. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Guo, S. Y., Fraser, M. W., 2010. Propensity Score Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE
Publications.
Hayami, Y., Ruttan, V. W., 1985. Agricultural Development: An International
Perspective. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
108Heckman, J. J., 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica,
47(1), pp. 153-161.
Heckman, J. J., Smith, J., 1996. Experimental and Non-experimental Evaluations. In
Schmid, G., eds., International Handbook of Labor Market Policy and
Evaluation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Heckman, J. J., Ichmura, H., Smith, J., Todd, P., 1996. Source of Selection Bias in
Evaluating Programs: An Interpretation of Conventional Measures and Evidence
on the Effectiveness of Matching as a Program Evaluation Method. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences.
Heckman, J. J., 1997. Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral
Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations. Journal of Human
Resources, 32(3), pp. 441-462.
Heckman, J. J., 2005. The Scientific Model of Causality. Sociological Methodology,
35(1), pp. 1-97.
Henson, R. K., 2001. Understanding Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: A
Conceptual Primer on Coefficient Alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in
Counseling and Development, 34(3), pp. 177-189.
Hiebert, D., 1974. Risk, Learning and the Adoption of Fertilizer Responsive Seed
Varieties. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(4), pp. 764-768.
Hogg, R. V., Tanis, E. A., 2010. Probability and Statistical Inference, 8e. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Howard, A., 1940. An Agricultural Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Imbens, G. W., 2004. Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects under
Exogeneity: A Review. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 86(1), pp.4-29.
Just, R. E., Zilberman, D., 1983. Stochastic Structure, Farm Size and Technology
109Adoption in Developing Agriculture. Oxford Economic Papers. 35(2), pp.
307-328.
Kallas, Z., Serra, T., Gil, J. M, 2010. Farmers’ Objectives as Determinants of Organic
Farming Adoption: The Case of Catalonian vineyard production. Agricultural
Economics, 41(5), pp. 409-423.
Khaledi, M., Weseen, S., Sawyer, E., Ferguson, S., Gray, R., 2010. Factors
Influencing Partial and Complete Adoption of Organic Farming Practices in
Saskatchewan, Canada. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(1), pp.
37-56.
Kislev, Y., Shchori-Bachrach, N., 1973. The Process of an Innovation Cycle.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(1), pp. 28-37.
Kuminoff, N. V., Wossink, A., 2005. Valuing the Option to Convert from
Conventional to Organic Farming. Paper presented at the American Agricultural
Economics Association Annual Meeting. Providence, Rhode Island, Jul. 27-27,
2005.
Kleemann, L., Abdulai, A., 2013. Organic Certification, Agro-Ecological Practices
and Return on Investment: Evidence from Pineapple Producers in Ghana.
Ecological Economics, 93, pp. 330-341.
Latruffe, L., Nauges, C., 2014. Technical Efficiency and Conversion to Organic
Farming: The Case of France. European Review of Agricultural Economics,
41(2), pp. 227-253.
Lapple, D., 2010. Adoption and Abandonment of Organic Farming: An Empirical
Investigation of the Irish Drystock Sector, Journal of Agricultural Economics.
61(3), pp. 697-714.
Lapple, D., Rensburg, T. V., 2011. Adoption of Organic Farming: Are There
110Differences between Early and Late Adoption?, Ecological Economics, 70(7),
pp. 1406-1414.
Lapple, D., Kelley, H., 2013. Understanding the Uptake of Organic Farming:
Accounting for Heterogeneities among Irish Farmers. Ecological Economics,
88(1), pp. 11-19.
Lewis, D. J., Barham, B. L., Robinson, B., 2011. Are There Spatial Spillovers in the
Adoption of Clean Technology? The Case of Organic Dairy Farming. Land
Economics, 87(2), pp.250-267.
Lindner, R. K., Fischer, A. J., Pardey, P., 1979. The Time to Adoption. Economic
Letters, 2(2), pp. 187-190.
Lipson, M., 1999. The Scientific Congress on Organic Agricultural Research:
Building a National Research Agenda. In Lipson, M., Hammer, T., eds., Organic
Farming and Marketing Research - New Partnerships and Priorities.
Proceedings of the Workshop. Santa Cruz: Organic Farming Research
Foundation.
Lockeretz, W., 1995. Organic Farming in Massachusetts: An Alternative Approach to
Agriculture in an Unbanised State. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,
50(6), pp. 663-667.
Lynne, G. D., 1995. Modifying the Neo-Classical Approach to Technology Adoption
with Behavioural Science Models. Journal of Agricultural and Applied
Economics, 27(1), pp. 67-80.
Lynne, G. D., Casey, C. F., Hodges, A., Rahmani, M., 1995. Convervation
Technology Adoption Decisions and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of
Economics Psychology, 16(4), pp. 581-598.
Mansfield, E., 1961. Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation. Econometrica,
11129(4), pp. 741-765.
Marra, M., Pannell, D., J., Ghadim, A. A., 2003. The Economics of Risk, Uncertainty
and Learning in the Adoption of New Agricultural Technologies: Where Are We
on the Learning Curve. Agricultural Systems, 75(3), pp. 215-234.
Mayen, C. D., Balagtas, J. V., Alexander, C. E., 2010. Technology Adoption and
Technical Efficiency: Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms in the United
States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(1), pp. 181-195.
Mzoughi, N., 2011. Farmers Adoption of Integrated Crop Protection and Organic
Farming: Do Moral and Social Concerns Matter?. Ecological Economics, 70(8),
pp. 1536-1545.
Oelofse, M., Hogh-Jensen, H., Abreu, L. S., Almeida, G. F., Qiao, Y. H., Sultan, T.,
Neergaard, A., 2010. Certified Organic Agriculture in China and Brazil: Market
Accessibility and Outcomes Following Adoption. Ecological Economics, 69(9),
pp. 1785-1793.
Offermann, F., Nieberg, H., 2000. Economic Performance of Organic Farms in
Europe. In Dabbert, S., Lampkin, N., Michelsen, J., Nieberg, H., Zanoli, R., eds.,
Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy, vol. 5. Stuttgart: University
of Hohenheim. pp. 1-198.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2008a.
Household Behaviour and the Environment Reviewing the Evidence. Paris: The
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2008b.
OECD Household Survey on Environmental Attitudes and Behaviour: Data
Corroboration Paris: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development.
112Padel, S., 1994. Adoption of Organic Farming as an Example of the Diffusion of an
Innovation. Working paper, Center for Organic Husbandry and Agroecology,
University of Wales. Cited in Rigby, D., Young, T., Burton, M., 2001. The
Development of and Prospects for Organic Farming in the UK. Food Policy,
26(6), pp. 599-613.
Padel, S., Lampkin, N., 1994. Farm-Level Performance of Organic Farming Systems:
An Overview. In Lampkin, N., Padel, S., eds., The Economics of Organic
Farming – An International Perspective. Wallingford: CAB International. pp.
201-219.
Padel, S., 2001. Conversion to Organic Farming: A Typical Example of the Diffusion
of an Innovation? Sociologia Ruralis, 41(1), pp. 60-61.
Pannell, D., Vanclay, F., eds., 2011. Changing Land Management: Adoption of New
Practices by Rural Landholders. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
Pietola, K. S., Oude Lansink, A., 2001. Farmer Response to Policies Promoting
Organic Farming Technologies in Finland. European Review of Agricultural
Economics, 28(1), pp. 1-15.
Rigby, D., Young, T., Burton, M., 2001. The Development of and Prospects for
Organic Farming in the UK. Food Policy, 26(6), pp. 599--613.
Rigby, D., Caceres, D., 2001. Organic Farming and the Sustainability of Agricultural
Systems. Agricultural Systems, 68(1), pp. 21-40.
Rogers, E., 1962. Diffusion of Innovations: The Impact of Communications. N.Y.:
Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Rogers, E., 1969. Modernization among Peasants: The Inpact of Communications.
N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Schultz, T. W., 1975. The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibrium. Journal
113of Economic Literature, 13(3), pp. 827-846.
Serra, T., Zilberman, D., Gil, J. M., 2008. Differential Uncertainties and Risk
Attitudes between Conventional and Organic Producers: The Case of Spanish
Arable Crop Farmers. Agricultural Economics, 39(2), pp. 219-229.
Sipilainen, T., Huhtala, A., 2013. Opportunity Costs of Providing Crop Diversity in
Organic and Conventional Farming: Would Targeted Environmental Policies
Make Economic Sense?. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40(3), pp.
441-462.
Smetana, J. G., Adler, N. E., 1980. Fishbein’s Value x Expectancy Model: An
Examination of Some Assumptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
6, pp.89-96.
Tiffin, R., Balcombe, K., 2011. The Determinants of Technology Adoption by UK
Farmers Using Bayesian Model Averaging: the Cases of Organic Production and
Computer Usage. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource
Economics, 55(4), pp. 579-598.
Tung, S. J., Shih, C. C., Wei, S., Chen, Y. H., Attitudinal Inconsistency toward
Organic Food in Relation to Purchasing Intention and Behavior: An Illustration
of Taiwan Consumers. British Food Journal, 114(7), pp. 997-1015.
Uematsu, H., Mishra, A. K., 2012. Organic Farmers or Conventional Farmers:
Where’s the Money? Ecological Economics, 78, pp. 55-62.
Welch, F., 1970. Education in Production. Journal of Political Economy, 78(1), pp.
35-59.
Wooldridge, J. M., 2009. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 4e.
Mason, OH: South-Western CENGAGE Learning.
Zingg, E., Mann, S., Ferjani, A., 2011. How Green are Communities? Explaining
114Difference between Swiss Municipalities in Environmental Stewardship on
Farmland. Regional Studies, 45(9), pp. 1245-1251.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5130-
dc.description.abstract農業不僅提供穩定與優質的糧食供給來源,同時也可維持生態環境並保留鄉村純樸的農家生活。近年來,隨著社會大眾對於食物安全的要求逐漸升高及都市居民休閒方式的改變,再加上環境保育比過去更受重視,有機農法已成為最為風行的農業生產方式。臺灣的有機農業於近十餘年間蓬勃發展,其中,東部的花蓮縣玉里鎮、富里鄉以及臺東縣池上鄉、關山鎮等地區,一直都是臺灣稻米的重要產區,又由於臺灣東部所受到的環境汙染較其他地區為少,因此在有機產業的發展上也相當穩定而快速。在學界,有機農業也是近年來被廣為討論的議題,而農業經濟領域相關文獻多著重於有機農法採用影響因素的檢視,少部分研究則探討有機農民與慣行農民在生產效率或生產力上之差異。本文的主要目的是結合近期技術採用文獻在方法論上的發展,以臺灣有機發展早,且成長穩定快速的花蓮縣富里鄉羅山有機村及周圍村鎮的有機稻農與慣行稻農為研究母體,分三方面探討有機農法採用的態度形成、影響因素以及經濟效果。
  首先,利用 Ajzen(1985)及 Ajzen and Madden(1986)提出的計畫行為理論,本文討論該理論各構面間之關聯性,亦即將重點放在態度、社會規範與行為控制間的關係,以了解農民有機農法之態度形成,並進一步比較有機農民與慣行農民在態度形成上之差異。其次,考量農民對於有機農法經濟影響的看法可能與一般態度構面的影響有所不同,同樣在計畫行為理論的架構下,本文檢視經濟考量及計畫行為理論各構面對於農民有機農法採用所造成之影響。本文的第三個主要目的在於探討有機農法採用所為農民帶來的經濟效果。本文利用Rosenbaum and Rubin(1983)提出的傾向分數法以處理技術採用經濟效果評估不可避免的自我選擇問題,在 Neyman-Rubin 虛擬事實因果推論的架構下,估算採用有機農法的農民在採用與不採用時之收入、成本與利潤等之差距,即所謂的受試者平均試驗效果(average treatment effect for the treated,ATT)。
  在實證分析部分,本文依據主要研究目的區分為三個相互連貫的子題。第一子題的實證結果發現,對環境與健康的態度不同,會對有機農民與慣行農民的正向有機態度形成造成不同的影響。對慣行農民而言,對環境與健康的態度i越正向,其持正向有機態度的機率越高;然而,對有機農民而言,此正向影響之程度則相當小。若進一步將有機農民依採用時點區分為早採用與晚採用之農民,本文發現,相對於慣行農民,對環境與健康的態度對早採用農民形成正向有機態度會產生負向影響,但晚採用農民與慣行農民之間則並未呈現顯著差異,這樣的結果說明有機產業在早期所面臨的發展問題。第二子題的結果顯示,在計畫行為理論的架構下,富里鄉稻農對資訊的態度會對其採用有機農法的機率產生正向影響,而環境與健康態度與採用機率之間並無顯著關係,主觀社會規範則呈現顯著的負向影響。本文亦發現與多數文獻的結果一致,經濟考量是影響農民採用有機農法的主要因素之一;再將有機農民依採用時點加以區分,則可發現早採用農民與晚採用農民最明顯的區別在於,影響早採用農民採用決策的因素主要來自態度構面,而經濟考量則是影響晚採用農民的主要因素。本文在第三子題應用共變數調整與傾向分數配對兩種方法估算有機農法採用的經濟效果;結果發現,有機農法採用平均而言造成富里鄉稻農單位面積收入減少約24,000 元,而單位面積利潤則減少約 2,500 元。
  本文依據主要研究結果提出具體建議。首先,營造對有機農法友善的社會氛圍或舉辦活動以促使農民與消費者之間產生更緊密的連結,將會有助於有機農法的推廣。其次,本文發現經濟因素是影響農民採用有機農法的主要因素,而採用有機農法會降低農民之收入與利潤,因此,就誘因設計而言,農政單位可以透過提高有機稻穀收購價格,以增強農民採用有機農法之意願。最後,相關單位應該再加強有機農產品的監管機制,以避免不肖農民或業者的投機行為造成農民對有機農法信心的喪失。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAs a stable source of quality food, agriculture also has the function of maintaining ecological environment and preserving the pristine lifestyle of rural residents. In recent years, in addition to fastening their eyes on environmental issues, the public are attaching more importance to food safety; organic farming has thus become a new mainstream of farming methods. As well, organic farming in Taiwan has experienced fast growth during past decades since the government put efforts in promoting the adoption of this “ecological production management system”, as defined by USDA National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) in April 1995.
Eastern areas, especially Yuli and Fuli in Hualien County as well as Chihshang and Guanshan in Taitung County, are the major rice production areas in Taiwan. Because the problem of environmental pollution has been less severe in those areas, organic farming keeps growing steadily in eastern Taiwan. Based on the survey data of Fuli Township in Hualian County, this thesis attempts to provide a synthesis of recent methodological developments in the literature to examine the attitude formation, adoption determinants as well as economic impacts of organic farming.
The major objectives of this thesis are three-folded. First of all, making use of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) developed by Ajzen (1985) and Ajzen and Madden (1986), this study aims at finding out the association between the elements of TPB, that is, the relationships between attitudes, perceived social norm and perceived behavioral control. Secondly, taking into account the different effects of TPB constructs and economic concerns, this study assesses the separate influences of these two determinants on the adoption of organic farming. The third objective of this study is to evaluate the economic impacts of adopting organic farming. Applying the propensity score methods proposed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), this study solves the self-selection problem encountered in effect evaluation of technology adoption. Within the context of Neyman-Rubin counterfactual causal inference framework, the so-called average treatment effect for the treated (ATT) is calculated by measuring the differences in income, cost and profit resulting from organic farming.
The empirical results are summarized as the following according to the three major objectives. First is that attitude toward environment and health has differential effects on organic and conventional farmers in terms of forming positive attitude toward organic farming. For the conventional farmers, the positive attitude toward environment and health increases the probability of holding positive attitude toward organic farming. However, for the organic farmers, this positive effect is quite small. Dividing the organic farmers into early and late adopters indicate that, relative to the conventional farmers, early adopters’ attitude toward environment and health has negative effect on forming positive attitude toward organic farming, while no significant effect is observed for the late adopters. This result reveals some problem in the development of organic industry at the early stage. The empirical results in the second part of this thesis suggest that, within the context of TPB, Fuli rice farmers’ positive attitude toward information will increase their probability of organic farming adoption. Moreover, while attitude toward environment and health has no significant influence on the adoption decision, perceived social norm exhibits negative effect. The results also indicate economic concern is the major determinant of rice farmers’ adoption of organic farming. A further division of the organic farmers reveals considerable differences between early and late adopters.
The results suggest the main motivation of early adopters comes from the attitudinal factors, while economic concern is the major determinant of late adopters’ adoption decision. In the third part, this study applies both covariate adjustment and propensity score matching methods to investigate the economic effects of organic farming. As a result of adopting organic farming, Fuli rice farmers’ income per hectare decrease, on average, by $24,000 NT, and profit per hectare decrease by $2,500 NT as well.
Based on the findings of this thesis, some policy implications for the promotion of organic farming can be inferred. First of all, creating a pleasant atmosphere of
organic farming or holding some events and festivals to bridge a close connection between the farmers and consumers will help promoting organic farming. Secondly, the empirical results reveal that economic concern is one of the main factors driving farmers’ adoption decision, and organic farming will reduce both income and profit significantly. Raising the purchasing price of organic-certified rice will therein create a stronger incentive for farmers to adopt organic farming. Last, but not the least, the governmental authorities should reinforce the monitoring and traceability
system of organic products to prevent the cheating or misconduct of a small number of organic rice farmers.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-15T17:52:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-103-R01627006-1.pdf: 6400883 bytes, checksum: 3c7b9b2698c6a3c0361f2e34c6a5df33 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要……………………………………………….………………….……….. i
第一章 緒論……………………………………………….……….……….. 1
第一節 研究動機與目的……………………….……………….……….. 1
第二節 有機農業的起源、定義及在臺灣的發展...………….……….... 4
第三節 研究地區簡介…………………………………...…….……….... 7
第二章 文獻回顧………….....…………………..……………….………… 15
第一節 技術採用相關文獻………………………………….……...…… 15
第二節 有機農法採用之相關討論………………………….……...…… 17
第三節 技術採用文獻常用的研究方法…………………….……...…… 27
第三章 模型設定……………..……………………………….……...…...... 30
第一節 理論模型…………………………………….……………........... 30
第二節 實證設計……………….…………..…………………….……… 44
第四章 資料概述與變數說明……………………...………………………. 54
第一節 資料來源與說明……….............................. 54
第二節 變數定義說明與基本統計特性……………………………........ 58
第五章 實證結果…………..…………………….………….……………… 73
第一節 稻農有機態度之形成與其影響因素…………..……………….. 73
第二節 採用有機農法之經濟考量與計畫行為………………………… 80
第三節 採用有機農法的平均試驗效果………………………….….….. 85
第六章 結論……………………………….………………………….….…. 100
參考文獻………………………………………………………………….…... 103
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title有機農法採用之影響因素與經濟效果-以花蓮縣富里鄉稻農為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Determinants and Economic Effects of the Adoption of Organic Farming: An Example of Fuli Rice Farmers in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee方珍玲(Chen-Ling Fang),謝銘逢(Ming-Feng Hsieh)
dc.subject.keyword有機農法,計畫行為理論,傾向分數法,Neyman-Rubin 虛擬事實架構,平均試驗效果,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordOrganic farming,Theory of planned behavior,Propensity score method,Neyman-Rubin counterfactual framework,average treatment effect,en
dc.relation.page115
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2014-08-12
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept農業經濟學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:農業經濟學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-103-1.pdf6.25 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved