請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50855完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李吉仁 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ying Du | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 杜瀛 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:02:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-07-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
陳莉雯譯,2015, B型企業,現在最需要的好公司,台北:城邦文化。 Ryan Honeyman,2014,The B corp Handbook: How To Use Business as A Force for Good, San Francisco, CA: Barrett-Koehler. 袁方編,2002,社會研究方法,台北,五南. 黃光玉、 劉念夏、陳清文譯. 2004,媒介與傳播研究方法:質化與量話研究途徑,台北:風雲論壇. A. Berger,2000,Media and Communication Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 英文部分 Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes & salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 507-525. Bosse, D.A., Phillips, R.A., & Harrison, J.S. 2009. Stakeholders, reciprocity & firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (4): 447-456. Choi, J., & Wang, H. 2009. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 895-907. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 92-117. Clement, R.W. 2005. The lessons from stakeholder theory for U.S. business leaders. Business Horizons, 48: 255-264. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Collier, D., Hidalgo, F. D., & Maciuceanu, A. O. 2006. Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications. Journal of Political Ideologies, 7 (3): 211-246. de Luque, S., Washburn, M.F., Waldman, D.A., & House, R.J. 2008. Unrequited profits: The relationship of economic and stakeholder values to leadership and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 626-654. Denzin, Norman K. 1970. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago, IL: Aldine Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65-91. Dunham, L., Freeman, R., & Liedtka, J. 2006. Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16 (1): 23-42. Evan, W., & Freeman, R.E. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business: 102-103. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Freeman, R.E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4 (4): 409-421. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. 2007. Managing for stakeholders: Business in the 21st century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24: 191-205. Gaborone, B. 2006. The Use of Documentary Research Methods in Social Research. African Sociological Review, 10 (1): 221-230. Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4 (1): 75-91. Gioia, D. A. 1999. 'Practicability, Paradigms, and Problems in Stakeholder Theorizing.' Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 228-232. Harrison, J.S., Bosse, D.A., & Phillips, R.A. 2010. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (1): 58-74. Jensen, Michael C. 2000. 'Value Maximization and the Corporate Objective Function,' in M. Beer and N. Nohria, Breaking the Code of Change (Boston: Harvard Business School Press), pp. 37-58. Reprinted (2002) as 'Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,' Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (2): 235-256. Jones, T.M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404-437. Lee, D., and H. Newby. 1983. The Problem of Sociology: An Introduction to the Discipline. London, UK: Hutchinson. Marcoux, Alexei M. 2000. Balancing Act in Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics (4th ed.), edited by J. R. DesJardins and J. J. McCall (Wadsworth): 92-100. Melanie Wallendorf and Russell W. Belk 1989. Assessing Trustworthiness in Naturalistic Consumer Research, in SV - Interpretive Consumer Research, eds. Elizabeth C. Hirschman, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research: 69-84. Miles, S. 2011. Stakeholder definitions: Profusion and confusion. Paper presented at the EIASM 1st Interdisciplinary conference on stakeholders, resources and value creation, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Barcelona, Spain. Miles, S. 2012. Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused? Journal of Business Ethics, 108 (3): 285-298. Mitchell, R., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principles of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853-886. Phillips, R. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7 (1): 51-66. Phillips, R. 2003. Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Phillips, R., Freeman, R.E., & Wicks, A.C. 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13 (4): 479-502. Post, J., Preston, L.E., & Sachs, S. 2002a. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45 (1): 6-28. Post, J., Preston, L.E., & Sachs, S. 2002b. Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Ragin, C. C. 2005. Core versus tangential assumptions in comparative research. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40 (1): 33-38. Waddock, S., Charles Bodwell, & Graves, S. 2002. Responsibility: The New Business Imperative. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 16 (2), 132-148. Webber, M. 1963. Order in Diversity: Community without Propinquity. In Cities and Space, ed. L. Wingo. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press. Walker, D.H.T., Bourne, L.M., & Shelley, A. 2008. Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization. Construction Management & Economics, 26, 645-658. Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods, (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 網站部分 中華徵信所企業股份有限公司. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 28 日取自http://www.credit.com.tw/CreditOnline/ 台灣經濟部中小企業處. (2016). 103年中小企業重要統計表. 2016 年 5 月 23 日取自http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=12788&ctNode=689&mp=1 台灣經濟部中小企業處. (2016). 2015年中小企業白皮書. 2016 年 5 月 29 日取自http://book.moeasmea.gov.tw/book/doc_detail.jsp?pub_SerialNo=2015A01237&click=2015A01237 社會網絡股份有限公司. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 28 日取自http://www.npochannel.net/ 亞太B型企業協會. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 25 日取自 http://www.bcorptaiwan.com/ 捷順企業有限公司自有品牌-茶籽堂. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 28 日取自http://www.chatzutang.com/#index 嘉威聯合會計師事務所. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 28 日取自http://www.jwcpas.com.tw/index.php?type=web 葉乃靜. (2012年10月). 質性研究. 2016 年 5 月 23 日取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678706/?index=2 瑞德感知科技股份有限公司. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 28 日取自http://www.hexsave.com/ 綠然能源股份有限公司. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 28 日取自 http://www.domiearth.com/ 綠藤生物科技股份有限公司. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 28 日取自https://www.greenvines.com.tw/ 銘宇興業有限公司. (無日期). 2016 年 5 月 28 日取自http://www.mingyung.com/index.php B corps. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2016, from https://www.bcorporation.net/ B corps. (n.d.). B Lab. Retrieved May 15, 2016, from https://www.bcorporation.net/what-are-b-corps/about-b-lab B corps. (n.d.). B Impact Assessment. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2016, from http://bimpactassessment.net/ B corps. (n.d.). 2011 B corp Annual Report. Retrieved May 15, 2016, from https://www.bcorporation.net/sites/all/themes/adaptivetheme/bcorp/pdfs/B%20Corp_2011-Annual-Report.pdf B corps. (n.d.). Find Bcorps. Retrieved May 26, 2016, from https://www.bcorporation.net/community/find-a-b-corp GEN. (n.d.). 2014 GEN Annual Report. Retrieved Jun 17, 2016, from: http://www.flipsnack.com/FA69B9F569B/gen-annual-report-2014-downloadable.html | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50855 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 企業在市場經濟體系中扮演維繫體系運作的重要角色,但近年來,從金融海嘯到黑心食品,全球都為企業失控的逐利心態付出沈重代價。細究成因,即是企業在實現獲利目標的過程裡,常忽視受其影響的利害關係人。在此一反思檢討聲中,B型企業的倡議與立法擴散備受矚目,也開始受到部分國內企業的青睞;然而,目前卻還缺乏相關學理的研究。因此,本研究擬以B型企業的認證內涵為基礎,探討其與利害關係人理論之異同,並對於台灣現階段B型企業的發展經驗,提出初步的實踐反思,以利未來B型企業的有利擴散,驅動企業在價值創造過程中,發揮正向的社會影響力。
承上述研究目的, 本研究採用深度訪談法與文獻回顧法,對研究議題進行探索。首先,利用與臺灣九位B型企業主進行的深度訪談,本研究歸納臺灣企業在申請過程間所面臨的機會與挑戰。接著透過文獻回顧,本研究整理B型企業認證自利害關係人理論演進以來的發展,歸納實務應用與學術理論的異同。最後,綜合上述方法與資料,進一步分析B型企業在國際成功脈絡與臺灣產業經濟特色,提出未來在臺灣推廣B型企業的三階段策略。 總結而言,本研究發現利害關係人理論及B型企業認證,對於利害關係人概念有兩個相同點:「核心價值」與「革新對象」;三點相異之處:「利害關係人分類」、「平等意識」與「比較能力」。另一方面,從訪談得知臺灣在推廣B型企業上,具備「中小企業多」的機會與「B型企業概念難以理解」、「有限推廣資源的配置」、「語言與文化落差」及「效益評估與平衡」的困難。故本研究建議採取三階段推廣策略,短期策略為聚焦B2B服務與製造的中小企業、中期策略為爭取B型實驗室成立在地據點、長期策略則是鎖定大型企業以提高整體影響力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Firm plays a significant role in the capitalism system. However, during recent years, from the financial tsunami to adulterated food, the whole society had paid tremendous costs resulted from profit-maximization goals and mangers’ greediness. More fundamentally, most of the enterprises tend to ignore the undesired effect they may create on stakeholders during their profit-seeking processes. Within such context of development, the initiative and law-making movement of B-corporation, which aims at balancing stakeholders’ interests while creating value has received great attention during recent years. Yet, systematic research on the theoretical foundation and practical obstacles of B-corporation is still lacking, which motives the present research. We therefore undertake a qualitative research approach to explore B-Corporation and its reflection and realization of the concept of stakeholder management. In addition, we explore how the certification of B-corporation has been diffused and what obstacles been faced in Taiwan during the past few years. By so doing, our research could contribute to the emerging movement of stakeholder management in general, B-corporation in particular.
The present study basically applies two research methods, namely in-depth interviews and literature review. Based on in-depth interviews with nine chief executives from certified B-Corp in Taiwan, we are able to summarize both positive and negative experiences and understand the opportunities and challenges faced by Taiwanese companies in applying for certification. Next, based on literature review, we are able to sketch theoretical development of the stakeholder management theory and compared it with the institutional framework of B-Corp in order to conclude their similarities and differences on the core concept of stakeholder. Finally, combining the above-mentioned methods and collected data, we further analyzed the institutional context of successful international companies and the economic attributes of Taiwan and suggest a three-stage strategy to promote B-Corp in Taiwan. To sum up, we found that the stakeholder theory and B-Corp framework are similar in core values and reformed targets while they are different in the extent of stakeholders, sense of equality and ability to compare. In addition, we also found that abundant numbers of small-and-medium sized firms constitute as favorable opportunities to promote B-Corp. while several obstacles exist, including understanding of B-Corp concept, constraints on promotion resources, language and culture gaps and benefit assessment and balance, among others. Therefore, we recommend a three-stage strategy for the movement of B-Corp. In the short term, one shall focus on SMEs in B2B services and manufacturing while make efforts to establish the B lab in Taiwan in the middle term. Finally, in the long run, one shall concentrate upon MNEs to maximize overall impact on the society. Practical implications and suggestions for future research are also discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:02:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03724003-1.pdf: 1469064 bytes, checksum: f8c3634cb4fced787428fb49a51c1ac3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
誌謝 II 中文摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目錄 VI 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究問題與目的 2 1.3 論文章節說明 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 B型企業 5 2.2 利害關係人理論 (Stakeholder Theory) 10 第三章 研究方法 15 3.1 資料來源 15 3.2 研究方法 15 3.3 研究限制 21 第四章 B型企業認證在臺現況 22 4.1 申請前動心起念(Why) 22 4.2 申請間經歷(How) 29 4.3 申請後改變(What) 39 第五章 利害關係人理論與B型企業認證 46 5.1 利害關係人理論與B型企業認證的對照項目 46 5.2 B型企業認證承襲利害關係人理論之處 46 5.3 B型企業認證轉化利害關係人理論之處 47 第六章 B型企業認證在臺推廣策略與限制 52 6.1 在臺推動B型企業的機會與困難 52 6.2 未來臺灣B型企業的推廣策略 56 第七章 結論與建議 61 7.1 研究結論 61 7.2 研究建議 63 參考文獻 64 附錄 69 附錄一 訪談大綱 69 附錄二 全球B型企業與臺灣行業對照表 70 表目錄 表4-1:臺灣B型企業申請前起心動念比較表 28 表4-2:臺灣B型企業申請間經歷比較表 33 表4-3:臺灣B型企業申請後改變比較表 45 表6-1:全球B型企業轉換中華民國行業別佔比 57 表6-2:B型企業在海外合作夥伴國家的成長狀況 58 圖目錄 圖1-1:研究流程圖 4 圖1-2:利害關係人地圖 11 圖4-1:A01企業的公司章程截圖 37 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 利害關係人理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利害關係人管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | B型企業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | B型企業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利害關係人管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 利害關係人理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Stakeholder Management | en |
| dc.subject | Stakeholder Theory | en |
| dc.subject | B-Corporation | en |
| dc.subject | Stakeholder Management | en |
| dc.subject | Stakeholder Theory | en |
| dc.subject | B-Corporation | en |
| dc.title | 利害關係人理論與B型企業認證之探索性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Exploratory Study on the Stakeholder Theory and the Certification of B-Corporation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳俊忠,吳相勳 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 利害關係人理論,B型企業,利害關係人管理, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Stakeholder Theory,B-Corporation,Stakeholder Management, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 72 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600781 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.43 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
