請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50849完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡克銓(Keh-Chyuan) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chung-Che Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳忠哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:02:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-12-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. AISC (2005), “Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings,” American Institute of Steel Construction.
2. AISC (2005), “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings,” American Institute of Steel Construction. 3. American Welding Society (1992), D1.1-1992, Structural Welding Code. 4. A.M. Kanvinde, and G.G. Deierlein (2006), “Void Growth Model and Stress Modified Critical Strain Model to Predict Ductile Fracture in Structural Steels.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE/June 2006/1907. 5. A.M. Kanvinde, and G.G. Deierlein (2007), “Cyclic Void Growth Model to Assess Ductile Fracture Initiation in Structural Steels due to Ultra Low Cycle Fatigue.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE/June 2007/701. 6. A.M. Kanvinde, and G.G. Deierlein (2004), “Micromechanical Simulation of Earthquake-Induced Fracture in Steel Structures.” Report No. BLUME-145, Stanford, California: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, July. 7. A.T. Myers, G.G. Deierlein, and A.M. Kanvinde (2009), “Testing and Probabilistic Simulation of Ductile Fracture Initiation in Structural Steel Components and Weldments.” Report No. BLUME-170, Stanford, California: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, May. 8. B.W. Schafer, R.P. Ojdrovic, M.S. Zarghamee (2000), “Triaxiality and Fracture of Steel Moment Connections.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE/October 2000/1131. 9. C.C. Chen, C.L. Lai, and K.C. Lin (2009), “Finite Element Analysis of Electro-Slag Welding for Diaphragms in Steel Box Column.” Proceedings, The Eleventh Taiwan-Korea-Japan Joint Seminar on Earthquake Engineering for Building Structures SEEBUS 2009, Kyoto, Japan, December 3-5, 2009. 10. FEMA (2000), “Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings,” FEMA 350, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. 11. J.R. Rice and D.M. Tracey (1969), “On the Ductile Enlargement of Voids in Triaxial Stress Fields” J Mechanics Physics Solids, 17(3), 201-217. 12. J.W. Hancock and D.K. Brown (1983), ”On the Role of Strain and Stress State in Ductile Failure.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids Vol. 31, No. 1,pp. 1-24, 1983 13. Kapil Khandelwal and Sherif El-Tawil (2007), “Collapse Behavior of Steel Special Moment Resisting Frame Connections.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE/May 2007/646. 14. K.C. Tsai, K.C. Lin, S.J. Juang, C.H. Li, and C.H. Lin (2015), “Research and Practice on Seismic Design of Welded Steel Beam-to-Box Column Moment Connections in Taiwan.” Proceedings, The Third Announcement of Symposium on Future of Development of Seismic Design, Hong Kong, February 13, 2015. 15. Victoria R. Wigle and Larry A.Fahnestock (2010), “Buckling-restrained brace frame connection performance.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 66 (2010), 65-74. 16. Y.H. Song, Takumi Ishii, Yukihiro Harada, and Koji Morita (2011), “Study on fracture behavior of electro-slag welded joints in beam-to-built-up box column connection.” Proceedings, The 6th International Symposium on Steel Structures, November 3-5, 2011, Seoul, Korea. 17. Yongjiu Shi, Jun Xiong, Yuanqing Wang, “Experimental Study on Damage Behavior of the Beam-to-Column Connection.” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. 18. 張智星 (2004),「MATLAB 程式設計入門篇」,清蔚科技與鈦思科技共同出版。 19. 吳家慶 (2005),「削切蓋板鋼骨梁柱接頭之耐震行為研究」,國立交通大學土木工程學系,碩士論文,周中哲教授指導。 20. 林克強、莊勝智、張福全、張柏彥 (2008),「台灣典型鋼梁與箱型柱採梁翼切削或梁翼加蓋板抗彎接頭之破壞模式」,鋼結構耐震設計與分析研討會論文集,國家地震工程研究中心,研究報告NCREE-08-037,台南。 21. 鄭元良、李台光、蔡克銓、汪家銘、林克強、莊勝智 (2011),「鋼骨梁柱接頭橫隔板耐震性能研究」,國家地震工程研究中心,內政部建築研究所委託研究報告。 22. 謝欣倫 (2012),「鋼梁與箱型柱接合內橫隔板耐震設計研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學系,碩士論文,蔡克銓教授指導。 23. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. (2013),「最新Abaqus實務入門」,第一版,全華圖書股份有限公司,台北。 24. 楊巽閎 (2015), 「新建含挫屈束制支撐之實尺寸兩層樓鋼筋混凝土構架耐震設計與實驗研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程學系,碩士論文,蔡克銓教授指導。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50849 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 因鋼箱型斷面柱構件雙強軸的特性,所以在國內鋼建築結構中應用非常普遍。為傳遞梁端彎矩至柱構件,箱型柱內與梁翼同高處須配置與梁翼同厚的橫隔板。內橫隔板與柱板間之銲接常使用電熱熔渣焊(Electro Slag Welding, ESW)之工法,此種焊道施作便利及效率高,目前已大量使用於國內鋼結構製造廠。然而,ESW在施做時的高入熱量恐導致其焊道結晶過大與抗衝擊性質較差,此現象亦常導致梁柱發生非預期的脆性破壞。林克強等人(2008)針對此銲接細節進行22組之梁柱接頭試驗,試驗結果發現,當接頭尚未發展明顯非線性變形前,常在ESW銲道之熱影響區(HAZ)附近發生脆性破壞,其破壞機率約為18%。鄭元良(2011)承接林克強(2008)之試驗結果進行ESW元件試驗,實驗結果顯示ESW偏心與梁翼板高程偏心對於整體反應影響甚大。本研究為避免ESW發生脆性破壞及量化ESW破壞之機制,引用Kanvinde (2004)建議之鋼材斷裂預測模型,利用有限元素模型對試體進行斷裂預測分析。
本研究延續鄭元良(2011)之梁柱接頭試驗,另外進行兩組試驗,藉由變化試驗之載重歷時與ESW之施工儲倉口截面形狀,探討試體之破壞時機並驗證鋼材斷裂預測模型之可行性。實驗結果顯示,標準型載重歷時與增加型載重歷時之破壞時機分別在目標位移角為3%弧度之第2迴圈及第1迴圈,證實累積塑性應變大小確實影響其破壞時機;ESW儲倉口截面由矩形變為與喇叭口形時,破壞時機在目標位移角為3%弧度之第2迴圈位置在ESW之熱影響區,轉變為破壞在4%弧度第1迴圈位置在梁翼焊接之熱影響區,顯示若增加ESW之熔透範圍可增加接頭試驗耐震性能。 為應用斷裂預測模型,本研究藉圓周刻痕拉伸(CNT)試驗與有限元素模型分析,將所得之材料參數對ESW元件試驗與梁柱接頭試驗進行斷裂預測分析。分析結果顯示, ESW之幾何形狀及相對位置對於破壞時機影響甚大,精確之分析模型可有效預測破壞之位置與時間,因此顯示破壞預測分析與CNT試驗之可行性,以及銲道超音波檢測(UT)之重要性。經由實驗與分析所得之結果,本研究進行ESW相關幾何位置之參數分析,藉由ESW銲道之垂直偏心與水平偏心對應不同梁翼板之偏心情況,共建立45組有限元素模型,並預測破壞之時機。分析結果顯示ESW關鍵區域之大小確實為影響破壞時機之主要原因,且當梁翼板與ESW成垂直反向偏心時,破壞時機最早發生,因此擴大ESW關鍵區域可有效的降低ESW破壞之發生,也證實儲倉口截面為喇叭口形可增加其耐震性能。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Steel box columns are widely used in steel building structures in Taiwan because of the strong axes in two directions. In order to transfer the beam end moment to the column, diaphragm plates of the same thickness and elevations as the beam flanges are usually welded inside the box column. The electro-slag welding (ESW) process is usually used in attaching the diaphragms to the column flanges. This ESW process has been widely used in steel beam-to-box column joints in Taiwan because of its’ convenience and efficiency. However, the ESW may increase the hardness of the welds and heat affected zones (HAZs), while reduce the Charpy-V Notch (CVN) strength in the HAZ. This situation could cause the diaphragm to column flange weld to suffer premature fracture before a large plastic rotation is developed in beam-to-box column joints. Results of 22 full scale steel beam-to-box column connection tests conducted in 2008 by Lin et al. show that the probability of ESW fracture at the HAZs adjacent to the ESW is about 18%. Cheng et al. continued the study in 2011 with new tests on full scale beam-to-box column subassembly and ESW components. Test results show that the fractures of the diaphragm-to-column flange welds are sensitive to the eccentricity between the elevations of the ESW and the beam flange. In order to quantify the critical eccentricity and the effectiveness of predicting the fractures, this study adopts the fracture prediction model proposed by Kanvinde in 2004 and utilizes finite element model (FEM) analysis to correlate the test results.
In this study, two additional beam-to-box column connection subassembly tests have been conducted with a different loading protocol or the shape of ESW chamber. It is found that the fractures of the aforementioned HAZs can be reasonably well predicted using the proposed procedures on applying the fracture model. Test results show that under the standard and increasing loading protocols, the instances of the HAZ fractures in the specimens correspond to the total beam end deformations of the 2nd and 1st cycles of 0.03 radian, respectively. It is confirmed that the fracture instances can be predicted based on the cumulative plastic deformation in the HAZs. Under the two same standard loading protocol, the flared ESW chamber alter the fracture location from the HAZ in the diaphragm weld to the beam flange weld, and delay the fracture at the 2nd cycle of 0.03 radian to the 1st cycle of 0.04 radian. Tests confirm that the possible fracture of the diaphragm to column flange welds can be mitigated by enlarging the chamber of the ESW. When the fracture prediction model is applied, the material parameters were firstly established from the Circumferential Notched Tensile (CNT) tests and FEM analysis. Subsequently, these parameters were used to predict the fractures observed in the ESW component tests and beam-to-box column connection subassembly tests. The fracture locations and instances can be reasonably well predicted by a suitable FEM model analysis. Thus, the effectiveness of CNT and the fracture model are confirmed. Analytical results also show fracture instances and locations are sensitive to the relative locations of the ESW and the beam flange. Thus, the importance of ultrasonic test in assuring the quality of the ESW is evident. Finally, a parametric study on the eccentricity between the ESW and beam flange locations is conducted using 45 models with various vertical and horizontal eccentricities of ESW with respect to the beam flange. The parametric study results show that the size of critical zone of ESW is indeed the most important factor affecting the fracture instance. When the relative vertical eccentricity between ESW and beam flange is increased, the fracture instances is accelerated. Enlarging the critical zone of ESW effectively reduces the possibility of fracture as evidenced by using a flared shape ESW chamber in the aforementioned test specimen. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:02:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03521216-1.pdf: 16512830 bytes, checksum: 35244387852e3260836b218b5646a6f0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目錄 v 表目錄 vii 圖目錄 viii 照片目錄 xii 第一章 介紹 1 1.1 緣起與研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的與方法 2 1.3 論文架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 電熱熔渣銲道(ESW)力學性質之相關文獻記載 4 2.2 鋼結構韌性斷裂預測理論與技術 5 2.2.1 Void Growth Model (VGM) 6 2.2.2 Stress Modified Critical Strain Model (SMCS) 7 2.2.3 Cyclic Void Growth Model (CVGM) 8 2.2.4 Degraded Significant Plastic Strain (DSPS) 10 第三章 鋼材斷裂試驗與預測模型之參數分析 12 3.1 材料試驗 12 3.1.1 材料來源與命名規則 12 3.1.2 金屬巨觀浸蝕試驗 14 3.1.3 圓周刻痕拉伸(CNT)試驗 14 3.2 斷裂預測模型之應用 16 3.2.1 VGM與SMCS 16 3.2.2 CVGM與DSPS 18 第四章 實尺寸鋼梁與箱型柱接頭試驗計畫 22 4.1 2011年實尺寸梁柱接頭試驗計畫 22 4.2 2016年試體設計與製造 22 4.3 試驗方法 24 4.4 試驗過程與結果 25 4.4.1 梁柱接頭試驗過程 25 4.4.2 綜合討論 27 4.5 金屬材料拉伸試驗 28 第五章 鋼材斷裂預測模型之應用與 有限元素模型分析 30 5.1 2011年橫隔板與箱型柱電熱熔渣銲接合試驗分析 30 5.1.1 試驗計畫與試體介紹 30 5.1.2 有限元素分析模型介紹與方法 30 5.1.3 模擬分析與試驗結果比較及討論 32 5.2 2016與2011年實尺寸鋼梁接箱型柱之試驗分析 33 5.2.1 有限元素分析模型介紹與方法 33 5.2.2 模擬分析與試驗結果比較及討論 36 5.3 電熱熔渣銲道(ESW)位置偏心對於破壞預測反應之分析 37 5.3.1 橫隔板與箱型柱電熱熔渣銲接合試驗分析 37 5.3.2 鋼梁接箱型柱接頭試驗分析 38 第六章 結論與建議 39 6.1 研究結論 39 6.2 電熱熔渣銲(ESW)施工方法與建議 41 參考文獻 42 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | circumferential notched tensile test | en |
| dc.subject | ultrasonic test | en |
| dc.subject | circumferential notched tensile test | en |
| dc.subject | finite element model anslysis | en |
| dc.subject | steel beam-to-box column joint | en |
| dc.subject | fracture prediction model | en |
| dc.subject | heat affected zone | en |
| dc.subject | electro-slag welding | en |
| dc.subject | steel box column | en |
| dc.subject | ultrasonic test | en |
| dc.subject | steel box column | en |
| dc.subject | finite element model anslysis | en |
| dc.subject | steel beam-to-box column joint | en |
| dc.subject | fracture prediction model | en |
| dc.subject | heat affected zone | en |
| dc.subject | electro-slag welding | en |
| dc.title | 鋼梁接箱型柱之內橫隔斷裂試驗與有限元素模型分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Fracture Tests and Finite Element Analysis of Diaphragm Connection in Steel Beam-to-Box Column Joints | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周中哲(Chung-Che Chou),林克強(Ker-Chun Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 鋼箱型柱,電熱熔渣銲,鋼材斷裂預測模型,鋼梁柱接頭,有限元素分析,圓周刻痕拉伸試驗,電熱熔渣銲儲倉口, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | steel box column,electro-slag welding,heat affected zone,fracture prediction model,steel beam-to-box column joint,finite element model anslysis,circumferential notched tensile test,ultrasonic test, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 130 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600760 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 16.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
