請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5066完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊鏡堂(Jing-Tang Yang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jing-Wei Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳靖瑋 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-15T17:51:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-02-25 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-15T17:51:30Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-02-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-01-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alden, M., Bood, J., Li, Z., and Richter, M. 2011. Visualization and understanding of combustion processes using spatially and temporally resolved laser diagnostic techniques. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33, 69.
Anselmo-Filho, P., Hochgreb, S., Barlow, R. S., and Cant, R. S. 2009. Experimental measurements of geometric properties of turbulent stratified flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32, 1763. Ayoolan, B. O., Balachandran, R., Frank, J. H., Mastorakos, E., and Kaminski, C. F. 2006. Spatially resolved heat release rate measurements in turbulent premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 144, 1. Azzoni, R., Ratti, S., Aggarwal, S. K., and Puri, I. K. 1999. The structure of triple flames stabilized on a slot burner. Combustion and Flame, 119, 23. Bohm, B., Frank, J. H., and Dreizler, A. 2011. Temperature and mixing field measurements in stratified lean premixed turbulent flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33, 1583. Balachandran, R., Ayoola, B. O., Kaminski, C. F., Dowling, A. P., and Mastorakos, E. 2005. Experimental investigation of the nonlinear response of turbulent premixed flames to imposed inlet velocity oscillations. Combustion and Flame, 143, 37. Ballester, J., and Garcia-Armingol, T. 2010. Diagnostic techniques for the monitoring and control of practical flames. Progressin Energy and Combustion Science, 36, 375. Barlow, R. S. 2007. Laser diagnostics and their interplay with computations to understand turbulent combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 31, 49. Barlow, R. S., Wang, G. H., Anselmo-Filho, P., Sweeney, M. S., and Hochgreb, S. 2009. Application of Raman/Rayleigh/LIF diagnostics in turbulent stratified flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32, 945. Boushaski, T., and Sautet, J. C. 2010. Characteristics of flow from an oxy-fuel burner with separatedjets: Influence of jet injection angle. Experiments in Fluids, 48, 1095. BeeAr, J. M. and Chigier, N. A. 1983. Combustion Aerodynamics. FL, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company. Berkooz, G., Homls, P., and Lumley, J. L. 1993. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 25, 539. Bernero, S., and Fiedler, H. E. 2000. Application of particle image velocimetry and proper orthogonal decomposition to the study of a jet in a counterflow. Experiments in Fluids, 29, S274. Bizon, K., Continillo, G., Leistner, K. C., Mancaruso, E., and Vaglieco, B. M. 2009. POD-based analysis of cycle-to-cycle variations in an optically accessible diesel engine. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32, 2809. Bizon, K., Continillo, G., Mancaruso, E., Merola, S. S., and Vaglieco, B. M. 2010. POD-based analysis of combustion images in optically accessible engines. Combustion and Flame, 157, 632. Bonaldo, A., and Kelman, J. B. 2009. Experimental annular stratified flames characterisation stabilised by weak swirl. Combustion and Flame, 156, 750. Bouvet, N., Chauveau, C., Gokalp, I., Lee, S. Y., and Santoro, R. J. 2011. Characterization of syngas laminar flames using the Bunsen burner configuration. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 992. Boxx, I., Arndt, C., Carter, C., and Meier, W. 2012. High-speed laser diagnostics for the study of flame dynamics in a lean premixed gas turbine model combustor. Experiments in Fluids, 52, 555. Bradley, D., Gaskell, P. H., Gu, X. J., Lawes, M., and Scott, M. J. 1998. Premixed turbulent flame instability and NO formation in a lean-burn swirl burner. Combustion and Flame, 115, 515. Burbano, H. J., Amell, A. A., and Garcia, J. M. 2008. Effects of hydrogen addition to methane onthe flame structure and CO emissions in atmospheric burners. Interna-tional Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 3, 3410. Casleton, K. H., Breault, R. W., and Richards, G. A. 2008. System issues and tradeoffs associated with syngas production and combustion. Combustion Science and Technology, 180, 1013. Chang, T. W., and Chao, Y. C. 2011. The stabilization characteristics of turbulent lifted diffusion flames of CH4/CO blended fuels. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33, 1655. Chaparro, A. A., and Cetegen, B. M. 2006. Blowoff characteristics of bluff-body stabilized conical premixed flames under upstream velocity modulation. Combustion and Flame, 144, 318. Chatterjee, A. 2000. An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition. Current Science, 78, 808. Choudhuri, A. R., and Gollahalli, S. R. 2004. Intermediate radical concentrations in hydrogen–natural gas blended fuel jet flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 1293. Chaudhuri, S., and Cetegen, B. M. 2009. Response dynamics of bluff-body stabilized conical premixed turbulent flames with spatial mixture gradients. Combustion and Flame, 156, 706. Chaudhuri, S., Kostka, S., Renfro, M. W., and Cetegen, B. M. 2010. Blowoff dynamics of bluff body stabilized turbulent premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 157, 790. Cheng, R. K., and Shepherd, I. G. 1991. The influence of burner geometry on premixed turbulent flame propagation. Combustion and Flame, 85, 7. Chen, H., Reuss, D. L., and Sick, V. 2011. Analysis of misfire in a direct injection engine using proper orthogonal decomposition. Experiments in Fluids, 51, 1139. Chen, H., Reuss, D. L., Hung, D. LS., and Sick, V. 2013. A practical guide for using proper orthogonal decomposition in engine research. International Journal of Engine Research, 14, 307. Coats, C. M. 1996. Coherent structures in combustion. Progress in Energy and Combusion Sciience, 22, 427. Dally, B. B., Masri, A. R., Barlow, R. S., and Fiechtner, G. J. 1998. Instantaneous and mean compositional structure of bluff-body stabilized nonpremixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 114, 119. Dam, B., Corona, G., Hayder, M., and Choudhuri, A. 2011. Effects of syngas composition on combustion induced vortex breakdown (CIVB) flashback in a swirl stabilized combustor. Fuel, 90, 3274. Das, A. K., Kumar, K., and Sung, C. J. 2011. Laminar flame speeds of moist syngas mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 158, 345. Davis, S. G., Joshi, A. V., Wang, H., and Egolfopoulos, F. 2005. An optimized ki-netic model of H2/CO combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 30, 1283. Dawson, J. R., Gordon, R. L., Kariuki, J., Mastorakos, E., Masri, A. R., and Juddoo, M. 2011. Visualization of blow-off events in bluff-body stabilized turbulent premixed flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33, 1559. De Leo, M., Saveliev, A., Kennedy, L. A., and Zelepouga, S. A. 2007. OH and CH luminescence in opposed flow methane oxy-flames. Combustion and Flame, 149, 435. Ding, N., Arora, R., Norconk, M., and Lee, S. Y. 2011. Numerical investigation of diluent influence on flame extinction limits and emission characteristic of lean-premixed H2–CO (syngas) flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 3222. Disimile, P. J., Savory, E., and Toy, N. 1995. Mixing characteristics of twin impinging circular jets. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 11, 1118. Dong, C., Zhou, Q. L., Zhao, Q. X., Zhang, Y. Q., Xu, T. M., and Hui, S. 2009. Experimental study on the laminar flame speed of hydrogen/carbon monoxide/air mixtures. Fuel, 88, 1858. Druault, P., Guibert, P., and Alizont, F. 2005. Use of proper orthogonal decomposition for time interpolation from PIV data, Experiments in Fluids, 39, 1009. Driscoll, J. F. 2008. Turbulent premixed combustion: Flamelet structure and its effect on turbulent burning velocities. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34, 91. Duwig, C., and Fuchs, L. 2007. Large eddy simulation of vortex breakdown/flame interaction. Physics of Fluids, 19,075103. Duwig, C., and Iudiciani, P. 2010. Extended proper orthogonal decomposition for analysis of unsteady flames. Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 84, 25. Egolfopoulos, F. N., Cho, P., and Law, C. K. 1989. Laminar flame speeds of me-thane-air mixturesunder reduced and elevated pressures. Combustion and Flame, 76, 375. El-Sherif, S. A. 2000. Control of emissions by gaseous additives in methane–air and carbonmonoxide–air flames. Fuel, 79, 567. Emiris, I., and Whitelaw, J. H. 2003. Control of combustion oscillations. Combustion Science and Technology, 175, 157. Esquiva-Dano, I., Nguyen, H. T., and Escudie, D. 2001. Influence of a bluff-body's shape on the stabilization regime of non-premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 127, 2167. Filatyev, S. A., Driscoll, J. F., Carter, C. D., and Donbar, J. M. 2005. Measured properties of turbulent premixed flames for model assessment, including burning velocities, stretch rates, and surface densities. Combustion and Flame, 141, 1. Fu, J., Tang, C., Jin, W., Thi, L. D., Huang, Z., and Zhang, Y. 2013. Study on la-minar flame speedand flame structure of syngas with varied compositions using OH-PLIF and spectrograph. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38, 1636. Galizzi, C., and Escudie, D. 2006. Experimental analysis of an oblique laminar flame front propagating in a stratified flow. Combustion and Flame, 145, 621. Gauducheau, J. L., Denet, B., and Searby, G. 1998. A numerical study of lean CH4/H2/Air premixed flames at high pressure. Combustion Science and Technology, 137, 81. Gaydon, A. G. 1974. The Spectroscopy of Flames. London UK, Chapman and Hall. Gil, Y. S., Jung, H. S., and Chung, S. H. 1998. Premixed flame stabilization in an axisymmetric curved-wall jet. Combustion and Flame, 113, 348. Higgins, B., Mcquay, M. Q., Lacas, F., and Candel, S. 2001. An experimental study on the effect of pressure and strain rate on CH chemiluminescence of premixed fuel-lean methane/air flames. Fuel, 80, 1583. Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L., and Berkooz, G. 1998. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry, Cambridge University Press. Huang, Y., Sung, C. J., and Eng, J. A. 2004. Laminar flame speeds of primary ref-erence fuels and reformer gas mixtures. Combustion and Flame,139, 239. Huang, R. F., and Yen, S. C. 2008. Aerodynamic characteristics and thermal structure of nonpremixed reacting swirling wakes at low Reynolds numbers. Combustion and Flame, 155, 539. Ikeda, Y., Kojima, J., Nakajima, T., Akamatsu, F., and Katsuki, M. 2000. Measurement of the local flamefront structure of turbulent premixed flames by local chemiluminescence. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 28, 343. Jackson, G. S., Sai, R., Plaia, J. M., Boggs, C. M., and Kiger, K. T. 2003. Influence of H2 on the response of lean premixed CH4 flames to high strained flows. Combustion and Flame, 132, 503. Jeong, Y. K., Jeon, C. H., and Chang, Y. J. 2006. Evaluation of the equivalence ratio of the reacting mixture using intensity ratio of chemiluminescence in laminar partially premixed CH4-air flames. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 30, 663. Kaskan, W. E. 1987. The dependence of flame temperature on mass burning velocity. Sympothium (International) on Combustion, 6, 134. Kiefer, J., Li, Z. S., Zetterberg, J., Bai, X. S., and Alden, M. 2008. Investigation of local flame structures and statistics in partially premixed turbulent jet flames using simultaneous single-shot CH and OH planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging. Combustion and Flame, 154, 802. Kim, H. S., Arghode, V. K., and Gupta, A. K. 2009. Flame characteristics of hy-drogen-enriched methane–air premixed swirling flames. International Journal of Hy-drogen Energy, 34, 1063. Kim, K. T., Lee, J. G., Quay, B. D., and Santavicca, D. A. 2010. Reconstruction of heat release response of partially premixed flames. Combustion Science and Technology, 183, 122. Kim, W., Do, H., and Mungal, M. 2011. The improvement of blowout limit in partially/fully premixed flames with geometrically modified bluffbody bases. Experiments in Fluids, 51, 1315. Kojima, J., Ikeda, Y., and Nakajima, T. 2000. Spatially resolved measurement of OH*, CH*, and C2* chemiluminescence in the reaction zone of laminar methane/air premixed flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 28, 1757. Kojima, J., Ikeda, Y., and Nakajima, T. 2005. Basic aspects of OH(A), CH(A), and C2(d) chemiluminescence in the reaction zone of laminar methane–air premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 140, 34. Kostas, J., Soria, J., and Chong, M. S. 2005. A comparison between snapshot POD analysis of PIV velocity and vorticity data. Experiments in Fluids, 38, 146. Kostka, S., Lynch, A. C., Huelskamp, B. C., Kiel, B. V., Gord, J. R., and Roy, S. 2012. Characterization of flame-shedding behavior behind a bluff-body using proper orthogonal decomposition. Combustion and Flame, 159, 2872. Kourentis, L., and Konstantinidis, E. 2012. Uncovering large-scale coherent structures in natural and forced turbulent wakes by combining PIV, POD, and FTLE. Experiments in Fluids, 52, 749. Law, C. K. 1988. Dynamics of stretched flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 22, 1381. Law, C. K. 2006. Combustion Physics. New York, Cambridge University Press. Law, C. K., and Kwon, O.C. 2004. Effects of hydrocarbon substitution on atmospheric hydrogen–air flame propagation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 867. Lawn, C. J. 2009. Lifted flames on fuel jets in co-flowing air. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 35, 1. Lee, T. W., North, G. L., and Santavicca, D. A. 1993. Surface-properties of turbulent premixed propane air flames at various Lewis numbers. Combustion and Flame, 93, 445. Legrand, M., Nogueira, J., Lecuona, A., Nauri, S., and Rodriguez, P. A. 2010. Atmospheric low swirl burner flow characterization with stereo PIV. Experiments in Fluids, 48, 901. Li, K., and Tankin, R. S. 1987. A study of cold and combusting flow around bluff-body combustors. Combustion Science and Technology, 52, 173. Lieuwen, T., Mcdonell, V., Santavicca, D., and Sattelmayer, T. 2008. Burner development and operability issues associated with steady flowing syngas fired combustors. Combustion Science and Technology, 180, 1169. Lieuwen, T. C., Yetter, R. A., and Yang, V. 2010. Synthesis Gas Combustion: Fundamentals and Applications, CRC Press. Lin, H. C., Cheng, T. S., Chen, B. C., Ho, C. C., and Chao, Y. C. 2009. A comprehensive study of two interactive parallel premixed methane flames on lean combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32, 995. Liu, F., Guo, H., and Smallwood, G. J. 2003. The chemical effect of CO2 replacement of N2 in air on the burning velocity of CH4 and H2 premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 133, 495. Lumley, J. L. 1967. The Structure of Inhomogeneous Turbulence. Moscow: Nauka. Lyons, K. M. 2007. Toward an understanding of the stabilization mechanisms of lifted turbulent jet flames: Experiments. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 33, 211. Mansour, M. S. 2003. Stability characteristics of lifted turbulent partially premixed jet flames. Combustion and Flame, 133, 263. Masri, A. R., and Bilger, R. W. 1985. Turbulent diffusion flames of hydrocarbon fuels stabilized on a bluff body. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 20, 319. Meyer, K. E. E., Pedersen, J. M., and Ozcan, O. 2007. A turbulent jet in crossflow analysed with proper orthogonal decomposition. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 583, 199. Meyer, T. R., Fiechtner, G. J., Gogineni, S. P., Rolon, J. C., Carter, C. D., and Gord, J. R. 2004. Simultaneous PLIF/PIV investigation of vortex-induced annular extinction in H2-air counterflow diffusion flames. Experiments in Fluids, 36, 259. Mira Martinez, D., Jiang, X., Moulinec, C.,and Emerson, D. R. 2013. Numerical investigation ofthe effects of fuel variability on the dynamics of syngas impinging jet flames. Fuel, 103, 646. Montgomery, C. J., Kaplan, C. R., and Oran, E. S. 1998. The effect of coflow velocity on a lifted methane-air jet diffusion flame. AIAA-98-0805. Moreno, D., Krothapalli, A., Alkislar, M. B., and Lourenco, L. M. 2004. Low-dimentional model of a supersonic rectangular jet. Physical Review E, 69, 026304. Muniz, L., and Mungal, M. G. 1997. Instantaneous flame-stabilization velocities in lifted-jet diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame, 111, 16. Mueller, C. J., and Schefer, R. W. 1998. Coupling of diffusion flame structure to an unsteady vortical flow-field. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 27, 1105. Mueller, M. A., Yetter, R. A., and Dryer, F. L. 1999. Flow reactor studies and ki-netic modeling ofthe H2/O2/NOX and CO/H2O/O2/NOX reactions. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 31, 705. Nair, S., and Lieuwen, T. 2005. Acoustic detection of blowout in premixed flames. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 21, 32. Nair, S., and Lieuwen, T. 2007. Near-blowoff dynamics of a bluff-body stabilized flame. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 23, 421. Nishimura, T., Kaga, T., Shirotani, K., and Kadowaki, J. 1999. Vortex structures and temperature fluctuations in a bluff-body burner. Journal of Visualization, 1, 271. Nogenmyr, K. J., Kiefer, J., Li, Z. S., Bai, X. S., and Alden, M. 2010. Numerical computations and optical diagnostics of unsteady partially premixed methane/air flames. Combustion and Flame, 157, 915. Nottin, C., Knikker, R., Boger, M., and Veynante, D. 2000. Large eddy simulations of an acoustically excited turbulent premixed flame. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 28, 67. Pan, K. L., Li, C. C., Juan, W. C., and Yang, J. T. 2009. Low-frequency oscillation of a non-premixed flame on a bluff-body burner. Combustion Science and Technology, 181, 1217. Peters, N. 2000. Turbulent Combustion. New York, Cambridge University Press. Petersson, P., Olofsson, J., Brackman, C., Seyfried, H., Zetterberg, J., Richter, M., Alden, M., Linne, M. A., Cheng, R. K., Nauert, A., Geyer, D., and Dreizler, A. 2007. Simultaneous PIV/PH-PLIF, Rayleigh thermometry/OH-PLIF and stereo PIV measurements in a low-swirl-flame. Applied Optics, 46, 3928. Piero, I., Christophe, D., Seyed, H., Robert, S., Laszlo, F., Ephraim, G., Andreas, L., Robert, C., and Marcus, A. 2010. Proper orthogonal decomposition for experimental investigation of swirling flame instabilities. 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 584 Pitts, W. M. 1989. Assessment of theories for the behavior and blowout of lifted turbulent jet diffusion flames. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 22, 809. Phillips, J. N., and Roby, R. J. 1999. Enhanced gas turbine combustor performance using H2-enrichednatural gas. ASME Paper 99-GT-115. Plee, S. L., and Mellor, A. M. 1979. Characteristic time correlation for lean blowoff of bluff-body-stabilized flames. Combustion and Flame, 35, 61. Poinsot, T. V. D. 2012. Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, R.T. Edwards. Poludnenko, A. Y., and Oran, E. S. 2010. The interaction of high-speed turbulence with flames: Global properties and internal flame structure. Combustion and Flame, 157, 995. Prathap, C., Ray, A., and Ravi, M. R. 2012. Effects of dilution with carbon dioxide on the laminar burning velocity and flame stability of H2–CO mixtures at atmospheric condition. Combustion and Flame, 159, 482. Radhakrishnan, K., and Heywood, J. B. 1981. Premixed turbulent flame blowoff velocity correlation based on coherent structures in turbulent flows. Combustion and Flame, 42, 19. Raffel, M., Willert, C. E., Wereley, S. T., and Kompenhans, J. 2007. Particle Image Velocimetry: a Practical Guide. Berlin, Springer. Ragland, K. W., and Bryden, K. M. 2011. Combustion Engineering. Boca Raton, CRC Press. Rankin, D. D. 2008. Lean Combustion Technology and Control. London, Academic Press. Ratna Kishore, V., Ravi, M. R., and Ray, A. 2011. Adiabatic burning velocity and cellular flame characteristics of H2–CO–CO2–air mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 158, 2149. Renard, P. H., Thevenin, D., Rolon, J. C., and Candel, S. 2000. Dynamics of flame/vortex interactions. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26, 225. Rightley, M. L., and Williams, F. A. 1997. Burning velocities of CO flames. Combustion and Flame, 110, 285. Sahu, K. B., Kundu, A., Ganguly, R., and Datta, A. 2009. Effects of fuel type and equivalence ratios on the flickering of triple flames. Combustion and Flame, 156, 484. Sazonov, V. A., Ismagilov, Z. R., and Prokudina, N. A. 1999. Catalytic combustion of lean methane–air mixtures. Catalysis Today, 47, 149. Schefer, R. W., Wicksall, D. M., and Agrawal, A. K. 2002. Combustion of hydro-gen-enriched methane in a lean premixed swirl-stabilized burner. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 29, 843. Schmidt, J., Kostka, S., Lynch, A., and Ganguly, B. 2011. Simultaneous particle image velocimetry and chemiluminescence visualization of millisecond-pulsed current–voltage-induced perturbations of a premixed propane/air flame. Experiments in Fluids, 51, 657. Seffrin, F., Fuest, F., Geyer, D., and Dreizler, A. 2010. Flow field studies of a new series of turbulent premixed stratified flames. Combustion and Flame, 157, 384. Shanbhogue, S. J., Husain, S., and Lieuwen, T. 2009. Lean blowoff of bluff body stabilized flames: Scaling and dynamics. Progressin Energy and Combustion Science, 35, 98. Shih, H. Y., and Hsu, J. R. 2011. A computational study of combustion and extinc-tion of opposed-jet syngas diffusion flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 15868. Shopoff, S. W., Wang, P., and Pitz, R. W. 2011. Experimental study of cellular instability and extinction of non-premixed opposed-flow tubular flames. Combustion and Flame, 158, 2165. Shoshin Y., Bastiaans, R. J. M., and de Goey, L. P. H. 2013. Anomalous blow-off behavior of laminar inverted flames of ultra-lean hydrogen–methane–air mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 160, 565. Sirovich, L. 1987. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures .1. Coherent structures. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 45, 561. Steinberg, A., Driscoll, J. F., and Ceccio, S. 2008. Measurements of turbulent premixed flame dynamics using cinema stereoscopic PIV. Experiments in Fluids, 44, 985. Stwalley, R. M., and Lefebvre, A. H. 1988. Flame stabilization using large flameholders of irregular shape. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 4, 4. Sun, C. J., Sung, C. J., He, L., and Law, C. K. 1999. Dynamics of weakly stretched flames: quantitative description and extraction of global flame parameters. Combustion and Flame, 118, 108. Sundaram, S. S., Babu, V., Obulesu, C., and Sivakumar, R. 2012. Three-dimensional numerical simulations of turbulent, bluff-body stabilized, lean, premixed combustion. Combustion Science and Technology, 184, 351. Sweeney, M. S., Hochgreb, S., and Barlow, R. S. 2011. The structure of premixed and stratified low turbulence flames. Combustion and Flame, 158, 935. Tang, C. L., Huang, Z. H., Jin, C., He, J. J., Wang, J. H., Wang, X. B., and Miao, H. Y. 2008. Laminar burning velocities and combustion characteristics of propane-hydrogen-air premixed flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33, 4906. Tang, C. L., Huang, Z., Wang, J. H., and Zheng, J. 2009. Effects of hydrogen addition on cellular instabilities of the spherically expanding propane flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 2483. Troe, J. Modeling the temperature and pressure dependence of the reaction HO+CO ix HOCO ixH+CO2. 1998. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 27, 167. Turns, R. S. 2000. An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications (2nd Ed.), McGraw Hill. Weinberg, F. J. 1986. Advanced Combustion Methods, Academic Press. Williams, T. C., Shaddix, C. R., and Schefer, R. W. 2007. Effect of syngas composition and CO2-diluted oxygen on performance of a premixed swirl-stabilized combustor. Combustion Science and Technology, 180, 64. Wilson, D. A., and Lyons, K. M. 2008. Effects of dilution and co-flow on the stability of lifted non-premixed biogas-like flames. Fuel, 87, 405. Worth, N. A., and Dawson, J. R. 2012. Cinematographic OH-PLIF measurements of two interacting turbulent premixed flames with and without acoustic forcing. Combustion and Flame, 159, 1109. Wright, F. H. 1959. Bluff-body flame stabilization: Blockage effects. Combustion and Flame, 3, 319. Wu, C. Y., Chao, Y. C., Cheng, T. S., Chen, C. P., and Ho, C. T. 2009. Effects of CO addition on the characteristics of laminar premixed CH4/air opposed-jet flames. Combustion and Flame, 156, 362. Xiouris, C. Z., and Koutmos, P. 2012. Fluid dynamics modeling of a stratified disk burner in swirl co-flow. Applied Thermal Engineering, 35, 60. Yamaguchi, S., Ohiwa, N., and Hasegawa, T. 1985. Structure and blow-off mechanism of rod-stabilized premixed flame. Combustion and Flame, 62, 31. Yamamoto, K., Kato, S., Isobe, Y., Hayashi, N., and Yamashita, H. 2011. Lifted flame structure of coannular jet flames in a triple port burner. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33, 1195. Yang, J. T., Chang, C. C., and Pan, K. L. 2002. Flow structures and mixing mechanisms behind a disc stabilizer with a central fuel jet. Combustion Science and Technology, 174, 93. Yetter, R. A., and Dryer, F. L. 1992. Inhibition of moist carbon monoxide oxida-tion by trace amounts of hydrocarbons. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 24, 757. Yokomori, T., and Mizomoto, M. 2002. Interaction of adjacent flame surfaces on the formation of wrinkling laminar premixed flame. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 29, 1511. Yokomori, T., and Mizomoto, M. 2003. Flame temperatures along a laminar premixed flame with a non-uniform stretch rate. Combustion and Flame, 135, 489. Yu, G., Law, C. K., and Wu, C. K. 1986. Laminar flame speeds of hydrocarbon + air mixtures with hydrogen addition. Combustion and Flame, 63, 339. Zhen, H. S., Cheung, C. S., Leung, C. W., and Choy, Y. S. 2012. Effects of hydro-gen concentration on the emission and heat transfer of a premixed LPG-hydrogen flame. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 6097. Zhen, H. S., Leung, C. W., and Cheung, C. S. 2014. A comparison of the heat transfer behaviors of biogas–H2 diffusion and premixed flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 1137. Zhen, H. S., Leung, C. W., Cheung, C. S., and Huang, Z. H. 2014. Characterization of biogas-hydrogen premixed flames using Bunsen burner. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 13292. 大塚哲二,1995,濃淡燃燒裝置,日本國特許廳公開特許公報,特開平7-253204。 黃木丈俊,藤生昭,1995,燃燒裝置,日本國特許廳公開特許公報,特開平7-151319。 楊鏡堂,高智勇,1999,對流衝擊型燃燒器,中華民國新型專利第149086號(專利權期間:1999/7/21~2010/6/28,發證日期: 88/12/06; 國科會專題研究計畫編號:NSC-87-2212-E-007-034)。 孫泊寧,1997,高負荷燃燒器之設計實作與火焰結構分析,國立清華大學動力機械工程學系碩士論文。 蔣淑卿,2002,複合進氣道燃燒器之火焰結構研究中,國立清華大學動力機械工程學系碩士論文。 藍斌豪,2004,多向斜衝燃燒器之衝擊效應數值分析,國立清華大學動力機械工程學系碩士論文。 羅允成,2007,多環燃燒器中火焰交互作用及最佳性能設計,國立清華大學動力機械工程學系碩士論文。 李志杰,2009,運用高速粒子影像測速技術探討火焰與流場動態交互作用,國立清華大學動力機械工程學系博士論文。 阮文祺,2009,三環燃燒器搭配非單一當量比之貧油燃燒研究,國立清華大學動力機械工程學系碩士論文。 林泓瑋,2010,環形貧油火焰特性與注入空氣共伴流之影響,國立台灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文。 陳靖瑋,2011,三環丙烷火焰暫態反應強度與流場之交互作用研究,國立台灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5066 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以層狀化燃燒器(stratified burner)為載具,建立包含化學螢光(chemiliminescence)和粒子影像測速儀(particle image velocimetry, PIV)之光學量測技術量測燃燒流場之火焰和流場暫態連續影像,並利用本征正交分解(proper orthogonal decomposition, POD)處理,進行燃燒流場結構重組和時空動態特性分析。主題依序分別為進流數效應和其穩焰操控方法,以及應用生質合成氣(氫氣及一氧化碳)於衝擊燃燒流場之燃燒特性,探討包含火焰型態、平均燃燒流場特性、同調結構(coherent structure)、模態頻譜分析,最終歸納出不同層狀燃燒流場之結構特性和提出穩焰機制及應用方法。
進流數效應依據進流數分為單股、雙股和三股預混甲烷火焰探討,由平均燃燒流場分佈發現隨進流數增加會增強燃燒流場中紊流強度峰值,同時也會增加高紊流強度的分佈機率,證明剪流層區主導改變進流數時之燃燒流場結構。透過POD處理發現燃燒流場的第一模態均為主導模態,隨進流數增加低模態能量會分散至高模態的結構。在空間分佈方面,水平及垂直方向上擺動振盪隨增加進流數而加劇;在時間變化特性方面,進流數增加和細碎結構增加且生成、消散的轉變快速造成高階模態週期減小和反轉處不規則抖動的間歇特性。在進流數效應操控穩焰方法部分,首先是加入空氣共伴流(air co-flow)之單股貧油甲烷火焰,其燃燒流場的火焰型態可分為四類:錐焰、飄焰、近吹熄和熄滅。在飄焰內側加入空氣共伴流並無明顯的影響,然而當外側加入之共伴流超過特定流速閾值時,則會改變火焰結構至較穩定之類錐焰型態,其與POD分析所出現之分層結構相似,形成衝擊反轉流場結構減少垂直方向速度分量,並使高溫燃氣蓄集在共伴迴流區當中,因此火焰能向上游傳播而形成類錐焰結構,顯示共伴流效應強化火焰結構並使反應強度提升。第二,在三股預混丙烷燃氣進流具速度梯度差之層狀化燃燒時,由於迴流區改變尾流流場結構造成的混合及各股火焰間的預熱效果,壓縮渦對(compressive vortex pair)的形成可擴展操作區間至phi = 0.5。壓縮渦對形成一股加速射流加強熱量和質量傳遞效應,具有提升火焰強度,達到幫助燃燒穩焰的功能。第三,三股預混丙烷燃氣在不同當量比(phi = 0.6-1.6)可將火焰型態分為融合火焰、穩定中環火焰和焰尖開口火焰等三種類型。在貧油燃燒時火焰強度與紊流強度呈現正相關之趨勢;反之,在富油燃燒時則呈現負相關之趨勢,透過POD處理後,在第一模態中,phi = 0.6時由低頻大尺度結構主導,但在phi = 1.6則由出口處高頻小層流化結構主導。顯示在貧油和富油燃燒不同情況下,熱擴散不穩定性效應具有主導影響化學螢光強度和速度場分佈的特性。 V型燃燒器具兩股45°燃氣進流,在迴流區的衝擊流場中具有增強混合、預熱與蓄熱等特性,藉由強烈的火焰與流場交互作用顯著強化富油丙烷火焰操作區間及其穩定性。在含生質合成氣之貧油燃燒部分,固定丙烷流率的情況下添加不同比例之氫氣與一氧化碳之火焰可燃下限可分別拓展至0.38和0.50,具有M型及丘型兩種火焰型態。在當量比0.6時,M型的H2/C3H8/air火焰溫度(1435 ℃)約為1.37倍丘型的CO/C3H8/air火焰(1050 ℃),而此時C3H8/air火焰已經熄滅,廢氣排放量(一氧化碳)也隨之改變。結果闡明在衝擊燃燒流場中預混火焰添加氫氣及一氧化碳下,火焰和流場交互作用機制,包含火焰結構轉變、迴流低速流場特性及化學動力學影響。本研究建立PIV和化學螢光法結合POD之光學量測分析技術,探討層狀化燃燒器之平均燃燒流場特性、重組及動態特徵,並歸納出操控方法及其交互作用機制。本研究核心及貢獻在於:發展有效實用之燃燒流場光學量測實驗及分析方法、研究層狀化燃燒之交互作用機制、建立燃燒流場重組及動態特徵分析方法、分析層狀燃氣進流數效應並提出共伴流、壓縮渦對及熱擴散不穩定性對火焰和流場交互作用之穩焰效應,以及添加生質合成氣之衝擊燃燒流場穩焰機制。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | An experimental method of PIV and chemiluminescence coupled with POD was constructed to capture transient images for both flames and flows with procession of the reconstruction, and temporal/spatial dynamic characteristics on a stratified burner. The issues in this study include the effects of inflows on the combustion characteristics with its mechanisms of flame stabilization, and application of syngas combustion on V-shaped burner.
The effects of inflows categorized with single, double and triple inflow mode were investigated for premixed methane flames, respectively. The increase of inflow number was found to enhance the peak value and broaden the higher level probability distribution function (PDF) for turbulence intensity, demonstrating that the presence of shear layer structure is the dominating factor. The mode 1 was found to be the dominant mode for all cases, but the energy-contained of low-rank mode was diverged to the high-rank mode. Both the horizontal and vertical oscillation was intensified with increase of inflow number; the presence of augmented oscillation and irregular vibration in turning point for high-rank mode was responsible for the fractalized structure. The effect of air co-flow on the single lean methane flame was investigated firstly. A variation of the position of co-flow injection shows that the inner one has no impact, whereas the outer one surpassing effective velocity ratios has a definite impact with flame configuration altered from a lift-off flame to a cone-like flame. This characteristic is similar with the presence of turning point the vertical oscillation because of a reversed flow with accumulated hot combustion products in the co-recirculation zone. It results in a lift-off flame propagating nearer the burner exit and demonstrats enhanced flame stabilization. Second, for stratified combustion of three premixed propane mixtures with velocity gradient, the operation region was expanded to phi = 0.5 with compressive vortex pair because of the enhanced preheating and mixing effects in the wake region. The compressive vortex pair structure effectively induces greater turbulent intensity to enhance the flame intensity, and thus achieves a salient performance of stabilization. Third, the flame intensity of the triple premixed propane flames with phi = 0.6-1.6 were found to correspond well with turbulence intensity in lean flames, but inversely in rich flames. With the mode 1 in POD analysis, the large scale vortex structures dominated in lean flames with low frequency, whereas the small stratified structures dominated in rich flames with high frequency. It indicates that the combustion characteristics influenced by the lean and rich flames were dominated by the change of diffusion-thermal instability. For the V-shaped burner the impinging region is capable of enhancing stabilization of rich propane flames due to benifits from the intense interaction between flame and recirculation. For the combustion characteristics with syngas addition the lean flammability of H2/C3H8/air is expanded to 0.38 and that of CO/C3H8/air is expanded to 0.50 with M type and hill type flame configurations. At phi = 0.6, the flame temperature of H2/C3H8/air with M-type flame is 1.37 times that of CO/C3H8/air with hill type flame, while the C3H8/air flame is extinguished; the CO emissions also change. The mechanisms of flame/flow interaction including alternation of flame structures, characteristics of recirculating flow, and chemical kinetics for impinging flames with H2 and CO addition were revealed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-15T17:51:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-D00522026-1.pdf: 11980622 bytes, checksum: 3fbc02cff54c5d3776a6d4cc1216b363 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖表目錄 xi 符號說明 xvi 第一章 前言 1 1-1 研究背景 1 1-2 研究動機與願景 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2-1燃燒強度變化性 4 2-1-1貧油燃燒及低熱值燃料之燃燒特性 6 2-1-2可燃極限 9 2-1-3化學動力學 12 2-2火焰/流場交互作用 13 2-2-1燃燒量測技術 13 2-2-2 火焰與渦旋交互作用 14 2-2-3應變率與曲率 15 2-2-4火焰面和熱釋放率特性 16 2-3 燃燒不穩定性 20 2-3-1熱量與質量擴散效應 20 2-3-2燃燒模態與振盪特性 21 2-3-3層狀化燃燒 25 第三章 研究方法 29 3-1 火焰型態 29 3-1-1 燃燒模式 29 3-1-2 燃料特性 30 3-1-3 當量比 31 3-1-4 實驗設備配置 32 3-1-5 燃燒器構造 32 3-1-6 流量控制系統 33 3-1-7 火焰影像擷取系統 34 3-1-7 火焰溫度擷取設備 36 3-2 PIV流場 36 3-2-1 PIV原理簡介 36 3-2-2 PIV實驗設備系統 37 3-2-2-1 追蹤粒子 38 3-2-2-2 雷射系統 40 3-2-2-3 透鏡組 41 3-2-2-4 高速攝影機與鏡頭 41 3-2-3 PIV影像流場處理 43 3-3 化學螢光 44 3-3-1光學窄頻濾鏡 45 3-3-2影像訊號放大系統 45 3-4 訊號處理方法 47 第四章 層狀化燃燒:進流數效應 48 4-1火焰型態 48 4-2平均流場及燃燒場特性 49 4-3燃燒流場之POD分析處理 61 4-3-1 層狀化燃燒流場觀測分析之困難點 61 4-3-2 POD原理及應用概念 64 4-3-3 POD之模態能量及重組 68 4-3-4基於POD處理之燃燒流場分析 74 第五章 層狀化燃燒之穩焰機制 84 5-1 空氣共伴流穩焰效應 84 5-1-1 單股進流 84 5-1-2 雙股進流 86 5-2壓縮渦對效應 94 5-2-1 穩定操作區間 95 5-2-2 貧、富油穩焰機制 96 5-2-3 火焰/流場之交互作用 98 5-3 熱擴散不穩定效應 105 5-3-1火焰型態 105 5-3-2平均燃燒流場特性 106 5-3-3基於POD處理之燃燒流場分析 113 第六章 添加生質合成氣之衝擊燃燒流場 117 6-1 衝擊燃燒流場特性 117 6-2 添加生質合成氣之影響 119 第七章 結論和未來展望 129 7-1 結論 129 7-2 貢獻與未來展望 131 參考文獻 133 作者簡歷 145 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 時空動態特性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 本征正交分解 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 化學螢光 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 粒子影像測速 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 層狀化燃燒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共伴流 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 壓縮渦對 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 熱擴散不穩定性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 衝擊火焰 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 穩焰 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | POD | en |
| dc.subject | Stratified combustion | en |
| dc.subject | PIV | en |
| dc.subject | chemiluminescence | en |
| dc.subject | temporal/spatial dynamics | en |
| dc.subject | co-flow | en |
| dc.subject | compressive vortex pair | en |
| dc.subject | diffusion-thermal instability | en |
| dc.subject | impinging flames | en |
| dc.subject | flame stabilization | en |
| dc.title | 層狀化燃燒流場之時空動態特性及穩焰機制研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigation on temperol-spatial dynamics and flame
stabilization of stratified combustion | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾培元(Pei-Yuan Tzeng),苗君易(Jiun-Jih Miau),王興華(Ching-Hua Wang),潘國隆(Kuo-Long Pan) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 層狀化燃燒,粒子影像測速,化學螢光,本征正交分解,時空動態特性,共伴流,壓縮渦對,熱擴散不穩定性,衝擊火焰,穩焰, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Stratified combustion,PIV,chemiluminescence,POD,temporal/spatial dynamics,co-flow,compressive vortex pair,diffusion-thermal instability,impinging flames,flame stabilization, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 148 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-01-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 機械工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf | 11.7 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
