Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50280
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng)
dc.contributor.authorHsuan-Hsuan Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃宣瑄zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T12:34:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-24
dc.date.copyright2016-08-24
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-08-01
dc.identifier.citation中華民國內政部營建署,(2007),國家公園設施規劃設計規範及案例彙編(第二版),下載日期:2015/07/20,取自:http://www.cpami.gov.tw/chinese/index. php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1033&Itemid=53
中華民國教育部國語辭典簡編本,(2009),http://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/jbdic/index. html
臺北市都市更新處,(2016),臺北都市色彩_色彩策略於都市再生之行動,下載日期:2016/05/26,取自:http://www.cityyeast.com/passion3_list.php?passion3type_id2=64
臺灣國家公園網站,(2015),公共設施管理系統,下載日期:2015/07/20,取自:http://nppw.cpami.gov.tw/
陳鴻興、陳詩涵譯,大田登著,(2007),色彩工程學:理論與應用,台北:全華圖書。
陳耀茂編譯,內田治著,(2009),意見調查的對應分析SPSS使用手冊,台北:鼎茂圖書。
王稚絜、林晏州,(2015),風景區中建築物之視覺衝擊與其對視覺偏好之影響,戶外遊憩研究,28(2),75-98。
何耀宗,(1984),色彩基礎,台北:東大圖書。
李盈婕,(2012),地點意義對景觀設施色彩適合度之影響探討,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學,台北。
林晏州、王珮琪,(1998),景觀規劃中色彩計畫流程之探討,造園學報,5(2),1-19。
施淑文,(1994),建築環境色彩設計,台北:淑馨出版社。
許媁鈞,(2014), 環境色彩組成與調和對情緒體驗與景觀偏好之影響,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學,台北。
梁亞甄,(2015),戶外色外貌,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學,台北。
彭依琳,(2013),品牌個性契合度對於超高大樓指標性建築與城市間關係之影響-以台北 101 為例,碩士論文,國立政治大學,台北。
鄭佳昆、李盈婕、沈立,(2013),地點意義對設施色彩環境適合度之影響,造園景觀學報,19(4),1-28。
賴瓊琦,(1997),設計的色彩心理-色彩的意象與色彩文化,台北:視傳文化。
戴孟宗,(2013), 現代色彩學: 色彩理論, 感知與應用,台北:全華圖書。
Anderson, L. M. (1981). Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forest landscapes. Forest Science, 27(2), 392-400.
Beerli, A., Meneses, G. D., & Gil, S. M. (2007). Self-congruity and destination choice. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(3), 571-587.
Boulding, K. E. (1961). The image: Knowledge in life and society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Boyatzis, C. J., & Varghese, R. (1994). Children's emotional associations with colors. The Journal of genetic psychology, 155(1), 77-85.
Cheng, C. K., Lee, Y. C., & Shen, L. (2016). Exploring compatible facility colors and associated colors for outdoor recreational spaces. Color Research & Application, 41(4), 424-432.
Chon, K.-S. (1992). Self-image/destination image congruity. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(2), 360-363.
Clausen, S. E. (1998 ). Applied correspondence analysis: An introduction (Vol. 121). London: SAGE Publications.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cresswell, T. (1996). In place-out of place: geography, ideology, and transgression. Charlottesville: University of Minnesota Press.
Crowley, A. E., & Hasty, R. W. (1983). The effects of color in store design. Joumal 01 Retailing, 59(1), 21-45.
Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method (Vol. RM-RP-167.): USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Range and Experiment Station.
de Destefani, L. R. G., & Whitfield, T. W. (2008). Esthetic decision‐making: How do people select colours for real settings? Color Research & Application, 33(1), 55-60.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.
Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (2003). The meaning and measurement of destination image. Journal of Tourism Studies, 14(1), 37-48.
Ekinci, Y., & Hosany, S. (2006). Destination personality: An application of brand personality to tourism destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 45(2), 127-139.
Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2014). Color psychology: Effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annual review of psychology, 65, 95-120.
Gobster, P. H. (1983). Judged appropriateness of residential structures in natural and developed shoreland settings. Paper presented at the Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Environ. Des. Res. Assoc, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, ME.
Gould, P. (1973). On mental maps. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Dpatial Behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
Groat, L. N. (1988). Contextual compatibility in architecture: An issue of personal taste. In J.L.Nasar (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 228-253). Camgridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanss, D., Böhm, G., & Pfister, H. R. (2012). Active red sports car and relaxed purple–blue van: affective qualities predict color appropriateness for car types. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(5), 368-380.
Heise, D. R. (1970). The semantic differential and attitude research. In G. F. Summers. (Ed.), Attitude measurement (pp. 235-253). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Hemphill, M. (1996). A note on adults' color–emotion associations. The Journal of genetic psychology, 157(3), 275-280.
Herzog, T. R., & Flynn-Smith, J. A. (2001). Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length, and width of urban alleys. Environment and behavior, 33(5), 653-666.
Herzog, T. R. L., O. L. (2003). Searching for legibility. Environment and behavior, 35(4), 459-477.
Herzog, T. R., & Stark, J. L. (2004). Typicality and preference for positively and negatively valued environmental settings. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(1), 85-92.
Herzog, T. R. B., A. G. (2007). Mystery and preference in within-forest settings. Environment and behavior, 39(6), 779-796.
Hodgson, R. W., & Thayer, R. L. (1980). Implied human influence reduces landscape beauty. Landscape Planning, 7(2), 171-179.
Hull, R. B. (1992). Image congruity, place attachment and community design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 9(3), 181-192.
Ishihara, S. (1917 ). Test for Coiour-Blindness. Tokyo: Hongo Harukicho.
Jacquot, L., Berthaud, L., Sghaïr, A., Diep, C., & Brand, G. (2013). The influence of “tastiness” and “healthiness” labels in cheese flavor perception. Chemosensory Perception, 6(2), 53-59.
Jamal, A., & Goode, M. M. H. (2001). Consumers and brands: a study of the impact of self‐image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(7), 482-492.
Janssens, J. (2001). Facade colours, not just a matter of personal taste-a psychological account of preferences for exterior building colours. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 14(2), 17-21.
Kaya, N., & Crosby, M. (2006). Color associations with different building types: An experimental study on American college students. Color Research & Application, 31(1), 67-71.
Kaya, N., & Epps, H. H. (2004). Relationship between color and emotion: A study of college students. College Student Journal, 38(3), 396-405.
Kim, H., & Richardson, S. L. (2003). Motion picture impacts on destination images. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 216-237.
Kobayashi, S. (1981). The aim and method of the color image scale. Color Research & Application, 6(2), 93-107.
Kotler, P. (1973). Atmospherics as a marketing tool. Journal of retailing, 49(4), 48-64.
Kurt, S., & Osueke, K. K. (2014). The Effects of Color on the Moods of College Students. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1-12.
Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design (pp. 60-61). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
Li, X. R., Pan, B., Zhang, L. G., & Smith, W. W. (2009). The effect of online information search on image development: insights from a mixed-methods study. Journal of Travel Research, 48(1), 45-57.
Linton, H., & Linton, R. (1999). Color in architecture: design methods for buildings, interiors, and urban spaces. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lowenthal, D., & Riel, M. (1972). The nature of perceived and imagined environments. Environment and behavior, 4(2), 189.
Mahnke, F. (1996). Color, Environment, and Human Response. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Manav, B. (2007). Color-emotion associations and color preferences: A case study for residences. Color Research & Application, 32(2), 144-150.
Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(1), 67-86.
McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M., & Montague, P. R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, 44(2), 379-387.
Nasar, J. L. (1989). Symbolic meanings of house styles. Environment and behavior, 21(3), 235-257.
Nasar, J. L., & Julian, D. (1985). Effects of labelled meaning on the affective quality of housing scenes. Journal of environmental psychology, 5(4), 335-344.
O'Connor, Z. (2011a). Colour psychology and colour therapy: Caveat emptor. Color Research & Application, 36(3), 229-234.
O'Connor, Z. (2011b). Façade colour and judgements about building size and congruity. Journal of Urban Design, 16(03), 397-404.
Ong, B. S., & Horbunluekit, S. (1997). The impact of a Thai cultural show on Thailand’s destination image. American Business Review, 15(2), 97-103.
Osgood, E. C. S., G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Oxford Learners Dictionaries. (2016), Retrieved from: http://www.oxfordlearnersdictio naries.com/
Phillips, D. (1995). Correspondence analysis. Social research update, 7, 1-8.
Polakowski, K., Zube, E., Brush, R., & Fabos, J. (1975). Landscape assessment. In R. O. B. E. N. Zube & J. G. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources. Stroudsberg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
Rabinowitz, C. B., & Coughlin, R. E. (1970). Analysis of landscape characteristics relevant to preference (Vol. 38). Philadelphia. Pa.: Regional Science Research Institute.
Reynolds, W. H. (1965). The role of the consumer in image building. California management review, 7(3), 69-76.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178.
Sörqvist, P., Hedblom, D., Holmgren, M., Haga, A., Langeborg, L., Nöstl, A., & Kågström, J. (2013). Who needs cream and sugar when there is eco-labeling? Taste and willingness to pay for “eco-friendly” coffee. PloS one, 8(12), 1-9.
Saito, M. (1996). Comparative studies on color preference in Japan and other Asian regions, with special emphasis on the preference for white. Color Research & Application, 21(1), 35-49.
Schloss, K. B., Strauss, E. D., & Palmer, S. E. (2013). Object color preferences. Color Research & Application, 38(6), 393-411.
Sivik, L. (1974). Colour Meaning and Perceptual Colour Dimensions : A Study of Exterior Colours. Goteborg Psychological Reports, 4(11).
Slatter, P. E., & Whitfield, T. W. (1977). Room function and appropriateness judgements of color. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 1068-1070.
Smith, D. (2008). Color-person-environment relationships. Color Research & Application, 33(4), 312-319.
Smith, K. D., & Daniel Wilson, D. I. T. (2014). Visual Display Calibration: An ANalysis of efficacy in Color Management. Visual Communications Journal, 50(1), 13-18.
Taft, C. (1997). Color meaning and context: Comparisons of semantic ratings of colors on samples and objects. Color Research & Application, 22(1), 40-50.
Ünver, R., & Dokuzer Öztürk, L. (2002). An example of facade colour design of mass housing. Color Research & Application, 27(4), 291-299.
Urland, A. (1997). Attempt at finding the objective factors underlying subjective aesthetical evaluations of exterior architectural colour schemes-an experimental research study. Colour Report: Colour and Psychology F, 50, 240-244.
Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. PA: Venture Publishing State College.
Whitfield, T. W. A., & Slatter, P. E. (1978a). Aesthetic aspects of colour in buildings: recent empirical developments. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 21(1), 31-34.
Whitfield, T. W. A., & Slatter, P. E. (1978b). The evaluation of architectural interior colour as a function of style of furnishings: Categorization effects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 251-255.
Whitfield, T. W. A., & Slatter, P. E. (1979). The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 65-75.
Whitfield, T. W. A., & Whiltshire, T. J. (1990). Color psychology: a critical review. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 116(4), 385-411.
Whitfield, T. W. A., & Wiltshire, T. J. (1980). The aesthetic function of colour in buildings: a critique. Lighting Research and Technology, 12(3), 129-134.
Wohlwill, J. F. (1978). What belongs where: research on the fittingness of man‐made structures in natural settings. Landscape research, 3(3), 3-5.
Wohlwill, J. F., & Harris, G. (1980). Response to congruity or contrast for man‐made features in natural‐recreation settings. Leisure Sciences, 3(4), 349-365.
Yatmo, Y. A. (2009). Perception of street vendors as ‘out of place’urban elements at day time and night time. Journal of environmental psychology, 29(4), 467-476.
Yildirim, K., Akalin-Baskaya, A., & Hidayetoglu, M. L. (2007). Effects of indoor color on mood and cognitive performance. Building and Environment, 42(9), 3233-3240.
Yim, C. K., Chan, K. W., & Hung, K. (2007). Multiple reference effects in service evaluations: Roles of alternative attractiveness and self-image congruity. Journal of retailing, 83(1), 147-157.
Yoon, S. Y., Tofle, R., Schwarz, B., Oprean, D., & Cho, J. Y. (2009). Understanding the meaning of color environments: a virtual environment exploratory study 2009 Annual conference of IDEC (pp. 924-934). St. Louis, MO: IDEC.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50280-
dc.description.abstract色彩是我們生活中十分重要的元素,在設計上也扮演十分重要的角色。根據過去相關研究指出,不同環境、物件皆有其意義,且當意義不同時,其適合色彩也會不同,由此可知,地點與設施之意義會影響其適合色彩,然而,過去景觀適合相關研究中,大多只探討視覺上之協調,並且都只針對單一地點或物件探討適合色彩,但是在景觀環境中,設施位於某環境時,其適合色彩應會受到設施本身意義以及其所在地點意義之影響,因此,本研究將以三個不同的角度切入,探討景觀地點、設施意義對於適合色彩之影響,了解適合色彩並不僅止於視覺上的協調,並進一步探討適合色彩是否受到物件意義或其所處環境脈絡影響。
首先,研究一將延續Cheng, Lee, and Shen (2016)的研究,並利用意象代替意義來測量意義對於適合色之影響,使用意象一致性的概念,說明當地點意象與色彩意象相符時,該色彩會為該地點之適合色彩。研究一將使用問卷方式調查人們對地點與色彩的意象,再使用Cheng et al. (2016)調查人們認為地點適合色之數據進行分析,而研究結果顯示,當地點意象與色彩意象越相符時,該色彩越會是該地點之適合色。
接著,本研究便會透過意義方面進行探討,研究二會使用歸納的方法,來測量人們對於不同地點與不同設施之適合色彩的看法,並進一步探討設施適合色彩是否會受到其所處地點意義之影響。研究二也將使用問卷方式調查人們對不同地點之不同設施適合色之想法,並使用對應分析了解地點、設施與色彩之間的對應關係。而研究結果顯示,不同意義的地點及設施之適合色彩會不同,例如,主題樂園之適合色彩會偏向彩度、明度高之色彩,而住宿設施則偏向彩度高、明度低之色彩;此外,研究結果也發現,同一設施位於不同地點時,其適合色彩也會有所不同,並且推測地點意義之影響會大於設施本身意義影響。
而研究三也會從意義的方面探討,但將會使用演繹的方法來測量,研究三會透過問卷調查方式,使用相同景觀背景但設施色彩不同之照片,並改變其地點標籤與設施標籤,詢問受測者其認為之色彩適合程度。而研究三結果顯示,改變地點標籤會讓色彩的適合程度不同,此結果與研究二結果相同,當設施位於某地點時,其所處之地點意義會比其設施本身意義對適合色彩之影響還大;此外,研究三結果也證實,色彩之彩度、明度、色相皆為影響適合色彩之因素。
透過此三個研究,本研究可以知道,意義的確為影響適合色彩之原因之一,從初步使用意象代替意義方式探討時便可知道,當地點與色彩意象相符時,該地點與該色彩之適合程度便會越高,由此可知意義對於適合色之影響;並且進一步使用意義探討時也可發現,不同意義之地點與設施之適合色彩會不同,且同一設施位於不同地點時其適合色彩亦會不同,而在相同景觀環境下,當地點標籤改變時,色彩適合程度也會改變,由此可以證實,適合色彩會受到意義影響,並且本研究根據結果推測,設施之適合色彩主要會受到地點意義之影響。
因此,本研究可以證實,景觀之適合色彩其實並不僅止於視覺上之協調,更會受到物件、環境意義影響,並且,當物件位於某環境時,其環境脈絡會較容易影響其適合色彩,且色彩之色相、彩度、明度皆亦為影響適合色彩的因素。希望透過本研究之研究結果,可以提供未來研究不同的探討方向,並且也能提供景觀環境設計時的應用準則,讓設計能更貼近使用者需求,創造更完善、舒適的環境以供人們使用,並讓設施也能成為美化環境之元素之一。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractColor is one of the main factors for environmental design, and also plays an important role in our everyday life. Many studies have indicated that different environments, buildings or objects all have different functions and meanings, and also have different compatible colors as well. Researchers have further suggested that the meaning of the objects might influence their compatible color. However, many studies which about environmental compatibility usually focus on aspect of vision and compatible colors of single place or single object. While buildings or facilities have their own meanings, the environments where the facilities were placed has their own meanings as well. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to discuss the effects of place and facility meanings on compatible colors. It is hoped that we can explore that compatible color not only affected by vision but also affected by facility meaning and place meaning.
The current study tried to explore the aforementioned issues from three different perspectives. First of all, the first study will extend the study of Cheng et al. (2016), and use image instead of meaning to explore the effects of the meanings on compatible color. Using the concept of self-congruity, the study suggested that when the place and the color images are congruent, the color would be considered the compatible color of the place. An online survey was conducted to understand how did people think about the images of places and the colors. And then analyzed with the data of compatible colors from the study of Cheng et al. (2016). The results indicated that color/place compatibility is positively related to their image congruity.
The second study used inductive method to understand that how do people think about compatible color of different place and facility, and further explore that weather the context of the place affects compatible color of facility. Through the corresponded analysis, second study explored the colors associated with the different facilities in different outdoor recreational places. The results showed different places and different facilities indeed have different compatible colors. For example, the colors with higher brightness and saturation were more likely to associate with theme park; the colors with high brightness and low saturation were more associated with accommodation facilities. In addition, the results also showed that the compatible colors for certain facility would be different when it was located in different places, and the effect of place meaning would be stronger than facility meaning.
From the deductive perspective, a web-based photo survey was conducted in the third study. Respondents were asked to rate the color compatibility of a landscape facility with 37 different colors, while the meanings of the facility and landscape were randomly assigned.Results showed that changing place label would make the compatibility of color be different, which was similar to the results of the second study. The facility in the place, the place meaning would all affect the compatible colors of the facility. Furthermore, the results also indicated that chroma, value, and hue all have different effects on compatibility of color.
Through these three studies, we may conclude that meaning would affect the compatible color. According the results of the first study let us know that congruent meanings are one of the reason for color to be compatible. Further, the results of second study and third study suggested that different places and facilities will have different compatible color, and the compatible colors for certain facility would be different when it was located in certain places. The results suggested that compatible color would be affected by meaning, and the place meaning could be one of the main reasons on compatible color of facility than facility meaning.
As the conclusion, results of this study suggested that compatible color of landscape not only affected by vision but also by the meaning as well. In addition, when objects are located in the environment, the environment context will also influence the compatible color. The present study suggested a new approach to color compatibility assessments, and supplies an appropriate planning policy of environmental design to create the environment that can make people feel comfortable. The results can also help to make facility to become one of elements to enhance environment.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:34:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-105-R03628302-1.pdf: 5860748 bytes, checksum: 15b51d51af27718ca408afc0dba82b3c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 III
摘要 V
ABSTRACT VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究緣起 1
第二節 研究目的 3
一、 研究一研究目的 3
二、 研究二研究目的 3
三、 研究三研究目的 4
第三節 研究內容與流程 4
第二章 文獻回顧 7
第一節 色彩與環境 7
一、 色彩相關理論 7
第二節 意象與意義 13
一、 色彩與意義 14
二、 地點與意義 15
三、 設施與意義 16
第三節 適合色 17
一、 設施適合色 19
二、 地點適合色 20
三、 意義對適合色影響 22
第四節 小結 24
第三章 地點-色彩意象相符程度對適合色之影響 27
第一節 研究目的與假設 27
第二節 研究設計與工具 28
一、 地點挑選 28
二、 色彩挑選 28
三、 研究工具 30
四、 語意差異法 31
第三節 調查流程 31
第四節 資料處理 32
第五節 分析結果 33
一、 受測者基本背景 33
二、 色彩抽樣 34
三、 結果分析 35
第六節 小結 37
第四章 不同地點與設施適合色之探討 39
第一節 研究目的與問題 39
第二節 研究設計與工具 40
一、 地點挑選 40
二、 色彩挑選 40
三、 設施挑選 41
第三節 調查流程 42
第四節 資料處理 43
第五節 分析結果 44
一、 受測者基本背景 44
二、 結果分析 46
第六節 小結 61
第五章 地點與設施標籤對色彩適合程度之影響 65
第一節 研究目的與問題 65
第二節 研究設計與工具 66
一、 地點標籤挑選 66
二、 設施標籤挑選 67
三、 色彩挑選 67
四、 照片處理 67
第三節 調查流程 72
第四節 資料處理 73
第五節 分析結果 74
一、 受測者基本背景 74
二、 結果分析 77
第六節 小結 89
第六章 結論與建議 93
第一節 研究結論與討論 93
第二節 研究限制與建議 97
一、 研究限制與建議 97
二、 研究應用 97
參考文獻 99
附錄 109
附錄一 研究一:各意象之色彩-地點差值平均 109
附錄二 研究三篩選照片範例 115
附錄三 研究一問卷內容 116
附錄四 研究二問卷內容 120
附錄五 研究三問卷內容 122
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject設施標籤zh_TW
dc.subject地點意義zh_TW
dc.subject設施意義zh_TW
dc.subject地點標籤zh_TW
dc.subject適合色zh_TW
dc.subject意象一致性zh_TW
dc.subject地點意義zh_TW
dc.subject設施意義zh_TW
dc.subject地點標籤zh_TW
dc.subject設施標籤zh_TW
dc.subject適合色zh_TW
dc.subject意象一致性zh_TW
dc.subjectSelf-Congruityen
dc.subjectPlace meaningen
dc.subjectSelf-Congruityen
dc.subjectCompatible coloren
dc.subjectFacility labelen
dc.subjectPlace labelen
dc.subjectFacility meaningen
dc.subjectPlace meaningen
dc.subjectFacility meaningen
dc.subjectPlace labelen
dc.subjectFacility labelen
dc.subjectCompatible coloren
dc.title地點與設施意義對景觀適合色之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effects of Place Meaning and Facility Meaning on the Compatible Color for Landscapeen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear104-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張俊彥,林晏州,歐聖榮,謝宗恒
dc.subject.keyword地點意義,設施意義,地點標籤,設施標籤,適合色,意象一致性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordPlace meaning,Facility meaning,Place label,Facility label,Compatible color,Self-Congruity,en
dc.relation.page124
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201601707
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2016-08-01
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝暨景觀學系zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-105-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
5.72 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved