請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5027
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 藍文欽(Wen-Chin Lan) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Lin Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李依霖 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-15T17:51:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-25 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-15T17:51:04Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 于第(2005)。技專校院圖書館實施編目委外作業之決定性因素及其現況研究。教育資料與圖書館學,43(1),29-47。
元智大學圖書館(2013)。元智大學圖書館。檢自:http://www.yzu.edu.tw/library/index.php/component/lang,tw/ 尹耀全(2010)。返回目錄:談香港大學圖書館幾種數位資源。在臺灣大學圖書館、中華民國圖書館學會主辦,2010年學術圖書館與數位資源研討會,臺北市。 牛惠曼、簡秀娟(2014)。各國因應 RDA 相關措施之探討。圖書與資訊學刊,(84),51-76。 王仕圖、吳慧敏(2005)。深度訪談與案例演練。在齊力、林本炫編,質性研究方法與資料分析(頁97-115)。高雄市:高雄復文總經銷。 王梅玲(2012)。數位時代公共圖書館電子資源館藏發展與管理。臺北市立圖書館館訊,29(4),18-32。 王麗香(2009,9月)。元智大學校務資訊系統簡介。在教育部主辦,大專校院校務資訊系統經驗交流研討會,臺北市。 史特勞斯、寇賓(Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.)(1997)。質性硏究概論(Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques)(徐宗國譯)。臺北市:巨流。(原作1970年出版)。 江慧娟(2004)。大學圖書館圖書編目委外作業書目品質管控及績效評估調查。未出版之碩士論文,世新大學資訊傳播學研究所,臺北市。 吳瑠璃(1995)。書目紀錄。在圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典(中冊,頁1211)。臺北市:漢美。 李芳菁(2001)。Web介面之線上公用目錄使用研究:以政治大學和清華大學圖書館為例。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學資訊與圖書館學研究所,臺北市。 冼麗環、陳啓仙、譚文力(2000)。中文圖書目次表與資訊檢索。在國家圖書館漢學研究中心編,華文書目資料庫合作發展硏討會論文集(頁273-296)。臺北市:國家圖書館。 東吳大學圖書館(2014)。東吳大學圖書館。檢自:http://www.library.scu.edu.tw/ 林靜莉(2001)。中文圖書編目委外機制之研究。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學資訊與圖書館學研究所,臺北市。 法務部(2014)。著作權法。檢自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=J0070017 芭比(Babbie, E.)(1998)。社會科學硏究方法(The practice of social research)(李美華等譯)。臺北市:時英。(原作1979年出版)。 長庚大學圖書館(2014)。長庚大學圖書館。檢自:http://library.cgu.edu.tw/bin/home.php 姚雨辰(2011)。臺灣學術圖書館館藏書目紀錄加值研究-以臺中地區為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺中市。 柯皓仁、陳亞寧(2013,11月)。鏈結資料在圖書館的應用。在全國學術電子資訊資源共享聯盟,海量資料:學術研究新境界研討會,臺北市。 飛資得系統科技(2011a年1月15日)。圖書館自動化系統ALEPH開放性簡介。飛資得ExLibris服務電子報。檢自:http://flytechnews.blogspot.tw/2010/11/aleph.html 飛資得系統科技(2011b年9月15日)。基於Primo系統的讀者調查與分析。飛資得ExLibris服務電子報。檢自:http://flytechnews.blogspot.tw/2011/09/primo.html 香港大學圖書館(2011)。香港大學圖書館。檢自:http://www.lib.hku.hk/ 香港嶺南大學圖書館(2013)。香港嶺南大學鄺森活圖書館。檢自:http://www.library.ln.edu.hk/ 庫麥(Kumar, R.)(2010)。研究方法:步驟化學習指南(Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners)(潘中道、胡龍騰譯)。臺北市:學富文化。(原作2005年出版)。 徐蕙芬(2012)。編目轉型下公共圖書館與合作編目的新契機。臺北市立圖書館管訊,29(4),33-46。 國立中興大學圖書館(2010)。國立中興大學圖書館。檢自:http://www.lib.nchu.edu.tw/ 國立中興大學圖書館(2011)。E世代的館藏查詢系統──資源探索系統(DDS)。圖書館館訊。檢自:http://www1.lib.nchu.edu.tw/lib_newsletter/news_201105_2.html 國立清華大學圖書館(2013)。國立清華大學圖書館。檢自:http://www.lib.nthu.edu.tw/ 國立雲林科技大學圖書館(2004a年9月14日)。雲科大網路書店結盟服務。圖書館電子報。檢自:http://www.lib.yuntech.edu.tw/~dev/paper/001spe1.htm 國立雲林科技大學圖書館(2004b年9月14日)。詳細書目內容介紹服務。圖書館電子報。檢自:http://www.lib.yuntech.edu.tw/~dev/paper/001spe2.htm 國立雲林科技大學圖書館(無年代)。國立雲林科技大學圖書館。檢自:http://www.lib.yuntech.edu.tw/ 國立雲林科技大學圖書館採編組(無年代)。書目加值。檢自:http://www.lib.yuntech.edu.tw/~acq/acdnl/004_3.htm#04 國立臺北藝術大學圖書館(2014)。國立臺北藝術大學圖書館。檢自:http://library.tnua.edu.tw/ 國立臺灣大學圖書館(2010a年6月15日)。初夏換新裝:館藏目錄TULIPS外觀及附加功能說明。國立臺灣大學圖書館館訊,新122。檢自:http://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/General/publication/Newsletter/newsletter122.htm#2_1 國立臺灣大學圖書館(2010b)。國立臺灣大學圖書館。檢自:http://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/ 國立臺灣大學圖書館(2011)。ezTULIPS 找書更 easy-新一代館藏目錄查詢系統使用說明。檢自:http://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/CI/services/ezTULIPS_manual.pdf 國家圖書館(2012)。中華民國101年圖書館年鑑。臺北市:國家圖書館。 國家圖書館(2014)。中華民國102年圖書館年鑑。臺北市:國家圖書館。 張天立(2004)。網路時代的契機與挑戰:網路書店的經驗分享。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,13,1-6。 張慧銖(2003)。圖書館目錄發展研究。臺北市:文華圖書館管理。 張慧銖(2010)。書目紀錄加值對目錄使用者辨識與選擇行爲影響之研究。圖書資訊學研究,5(1),1-22。 張慧銖(2011)。圖書館電子資源組織-從書架到網路。新北市:Airiti Press Inc。 張慧銖(2012,11月)。各類型圖書館使用MARC21與RDA現況調查。在國家圖書館主辦,MARC21及RDA論壇,臺北市。 張慧銖(2014)。從使用者觀點探討書目紀錄以MARC、DC、MODS描述與加值之比較研究。教育資料與圖書館學,51(3),365-389。 張慧銖、姚雨辰、林美妙(2008,7月)。圖書館館藏目錄加值問題初探。在中華圖書資訊學教育學會、武漢大學信息管理學院主辦,2008年海峽兩岸圖書資訊學學術研討會,湖北省。 教育部統計處(2012)。101學年度各級學校數分布概況。檢自:http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1729&Page=15300&Index=7&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf 教育部統計處(2013)。大專校院圖書館統計。檢自:http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=3752&Page=17284&Index=8&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf 許靜芬(2012)。中文網路書目資源轉換為圖書館書目格式的可行性初探。國家圖書館刊,2,65-85。 陳介英(2005)。深度訪談在經驗研究地位的反思。在齊力、林本炫編,質性研究方法與資料分析(頁117-127)。高雄市:高雄復文總經銷。 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。 陳和琴(2012)。新世代圖書館技術服務淺探。臺北市立圖書館館訊,29(4),1-17 陳和琴、歐陽慧(2003)。圖書線上資訊交換標準(ONIX for Books)之研究。教育資料與圖書館學,41(2),219-235。 陳明燁(2009)。Web2.0 @ NTHU Library。國立清華大學圖書館館訊,58,23-25。 陳昭珍(2014)。由供應鏈提供的電子書書目紀錄品質與維護問題之探討:以臺灣學術電子書暨資料庫聯盟的運作為例。教育資料與圖書館學,51(3),391-410。 陳素美(2010)。採編館員專業知能表現於技術服務歷程之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺中市。 陳淑燕(2002)。圖書目次分析與加值服務:從Ohio LINK書目轉錄談起。國家圖書館館訊,1,29-33。 陳惠瑜(2002)。公共圖書館網路版線上公用目錄使用研究。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學資訊與圖書館學研究所,臺北市。 陳微麗(2005)。網路書店書目資訊使用研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。 博客來數位科技股份有限公司(2011)。破壞性情緒管理:達賴喇嘛與西方科學大師的智慧。檢自:http://www.books.com.tw/exep/prod/booksfile.php?item=0010223141#intro 黃鴻珠、石秋霞(2006,12月)。線上目錄的新面貌。在淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館、淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系、飛資得資訊有限公司,Web 2.0與圖書館研討會,新北市。 溫達茂、鄭麗敏(2006)。從圖書館與資訊服務的角度看 Web 2.0 的應用。在淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館、淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系、飛資得資訊有限公司主辦,Web 2.0與圖書館研討會,新北市。 葉乃靜(2008)。探索Web2.0環境下圖書館的異質知識服務。圖書與資訊學刊,64,61-67。 葉至誠、葉立誠(2002)。研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市:商鼎文化。 詹麗萍(2003)。圖書館數位化館藏組織整理與OPAC的新角色。國家圖書館館刊,1,95-109。 鄧英蘭(2001)。圖書書目著錄加值分析之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。 賴文智(2014)。部落格常見錯誤著作權概念及常見授權方式。檢自:http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=206773&ctNode=6988&mp=1 簡秀娟(2012)。加拿大CIP機制之探討。大學圖書館,16(2),105-124。 藍文欽(2004)。讀者如何使用線上目錄中的著錄項目。(行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告,NSC93-2413-H002-026)。臺北市:臺灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。 羅思嘉(2010)。圖書館營運成效分析。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,19,8-16。 Arlene, G. T. & Daniel, N. J. (2009). Cataloging. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3th ed., pp.798-807). New York: Taylor & Francis. Atchley, E. (2004). Full-time equivalent (fte). In M. Stahl (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health care management.(p. 221). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412950602.n320 Baker & Taylor (2009). Baker & Taylor acquires Blackwell North America and James Bennett. Retrieved from http://www.ybp.com/newsarchive/1209_blackwell.html Baker & Taylor (2012a). Build the power of your catalog with the YBP MARC enrichment service. Retrieved from http://www.ybp.com/pdf/MARC.pdf Baker & Taylor (2012b). Content cafe 2. Retrieved from http://www.ybp.com/communitycollege/news/1110_contentcafe.html Baker & Taylor (2012c). Information services. Retrieved from http://www.btol.com/ps_details.cfm?id=222 Baker & Taylor (2012d). YBP's MARC enrichment service. Retrieved from http://www.ybp.com/MARCenrichmentservice.html Barre, K. L. (2012). Introduction. Library Trends, 61(1), 1-6. Belkin, N. J., Chang, S., Downs, T., Saracevic, T., & Zhao, S. (1990). Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs. In D. Henderson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 53rd ASIS Annual Meeting (pp. 69-79). Medford, NJ: Learned Information Inc. Blackwell (2011). Academic, educational and business books: Blackwell's bookshop online. Retrieved from http://bookshop.blackwell.co.uk/jsp/welcome.jsp Bowker (2012). Catalog enrichment. Retrieved from http://www.bowker.co.uk/en-UK/products/servlib_cat_enrich.shtml Breeding, M. (2007). Introduction. Library Technology Reports, 43(4), 5-14. Breeding, M. (2014). Discovery Product Functionality. Library Technology Reports, 50(1), 5-32. Byrne, A. & Micco M. (1988). Improving OPAC subject access: The ADFA experiment. College & Research Libraries, 49(5), 432-441. Byrum, J. D. & Williamson, D. W. (2006). Enriching traditional cataloging for improved access to information: Library of Congress tables of contents projects. Information Technology and Libraries, 3, 4-11. Byrum, J. D., Jr. (2006). Recommendations for urgently needed improvement of OPAC and the role of the national bibliographic agency in achieving it. International Cataloging & Bibliographic Control, 35(4), 75-81. Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools: Final report. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf Calhoun, K., Cantrell, J., Gallagher, P., & Hawk, J. (2009). Online catalogs: What users and librarians want. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Chapman, A. & Danskin, A. (2003). A new direction for bibliographic records: The development of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Catalogue and Index, 148, 8-11. Claremont University Consortium's libraries (2005). Claremont Colleges Library. Retrieved from http://libraries.claremont.edu/ Cochrane, P. A. (1978). Books are for use: Final report of the subject access project to the Council on Library Resources. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Information Studies. Coffman, S. (1999). Building earth's LARGEST library: Driving into the future. Searcher, 7(3), 34. Cooper, W. S. (1970). The potential usefulness of catalog access points other than author, title, and subject. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21(2), 112-127. Coyle, K. (2012). Introduction. Library Technology Reports, 48(4), 6-9. Debruin, V. (1977). Sometimes dirty things are seen on the screen: A mini-evaluation of the COM microcatalogue at the University of Toronto Library. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 3(5), 256-266. Dempsey, L. (2013). Thirteen ways of looking at libraries, discovery and the catalogue: scale, workflow, attention. In C. Sally (Eds.), Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue (pp. 179-202). London: Facet Publishing. Dillon, M. & Wenzel, P. (1990). Retrieval effectiveness of enhanced bibliographic records. Library Hi Tech, 8(3), 43-46. Dinkins, D., & Kirkland, L. N. (2006). It's what's inside that counts: Adding contents notes to bibliographic records and its impact on circulation. College and Undergraduate Libraries, 13(1), 59-71. Dorman, D. C. (1996). TOC about enhancements. American Libraries, 27(5), 82-84. Dwyer, J. (1992). Bibliographic records enhancement. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 13(3-4), 29-51. EBSCO (2012). Providing an enhanced library catalog experience. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/public/content-cafe Faiks, A., Radermacher, A., & Sheehan, A. (2007). What about the book? Google-izing the catalog with tables of contents. Library Philosophy & Practice, 9(3), 1-12. Garza, A. (2009). From OPAC to CMS: Drupal as an extensible library platform. Library Hi Tech, 27(2), 252-267. Gorman, M. (1998). The five laws of library science: Then and now. School Library Journal, 44(7), 20-23. Hane, P. J. (2004). Innovative interfaces offers enhanced data from Content cafe. Weekly News Digest. Retrieved from http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/Digest/Innovative-Interfaces-Offers-Enhanced-Data-from-Content-Caf-16304.asp Hofmann, M. A. & Yang, S. Q. (2012). “Discovering” what's changed: A revisit of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 253-274. Houser, J. (2009). The VuFind implementation at Villanova University. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 93-105. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2009). IFLA cataloguing principles: The statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) and its glossary: In 20 languages. Munchen: K.G. Saur. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf Jane, G. (2009). Metadata and digital information. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3th ed., pp.3610-3623). New York: Taylor & Francis. Jia, M., & Cathy, W. (2008). Revitalizing the library OPAC: Interlace, searching, and display challenges. Information Technology & Libraries, 27(1), 5-22. Katz, D. (2013). New & improved searching in VuFind, the library catalog. Retrieved from http://blog.library.villanova.edu/news/2013/01/14/new-improved-searching-in-vufind/ Kemp, R. (2007). Catalog/cataloging changes and web 2.0 functionality: New directions for serials. The Serials Librarian Serials Librarian, 53(4), 91-112. Knutson, G. S. (1991). Subject enhancement: Report on an experiment. College and Research Libraries, 52(1), 65-79. Kontrovitz, E. (2012). Content cafe. Retrieved from http://www.btol.com/pdfs/content_cafe.pdf Large, A., & Beheshti, J. (1997). OPACs: A research review. Library & Information Science Research, 19(2), 111-133. Li, H., Deng, S., & Deyoe, N. (2007). Dynamic map display in web OPAC: An experiment at Wichita State University Libraries. Chinese Librarianship, (24), 1-1. Libby, K. A. & Caudle, D. M. (1997). A survey on the Outsourcing of Cataloging in Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 58(6), 550-561. LISWiki (2011). PALINET. Retrieved from http://liswiki.org/wiki/PALINET Lo, P. & Chow, J. (2003). Enhancing bibliographical records by adding amazon URL links-Lingnan university library’s experience. Journal of East Asian Libraries, 129, 61-76. LYRASIS (n.d.). LYRASIS. Retrieved from https://www.lyrasis.org/Pages/Main.aspx Madarash-Hill, C., & Hill, J. B. (2004). Enhancing access to IEEE conference proceedings. Science & Technology Libraries, 24(3-4), 389-399. Madarash-Hill, C., & Hill, J. B. (2005). Electronically enriched enhancements in catalog records: A use study of books described on records with URL enhancements versus those sithout. Technical Services Quarterly, 23(2), 19-31. Maltby, A. & Duxbury, A. (1972). Description and annotation in catalogues: Reader requirements. New Library World, 73(10), 260-273. Marcus, R. S., Kugel, P., & Benenfeld, A. R. (1978). Catalog information and text as indicators of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(1), 15-30. Markey, K. & Calhoun, K. S. (1987). Unique words contributed by MARC records with summary and/or contents notes. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=karen_calhoun Markey, K. (1983). Online catalog use: Results of surveys and focus group interviews in several libraries. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Office of Research. Michalak, T. J. (1990). An experiment in enhancing catalog records at Carnegie Mellon University. Library Hi Tech, 8(3), 33-41. Moeller, P. (2007). Enhancing access to rare journals: Cover images and contents in the online catalog. Serials Review, 33(4), 231-237. Morris, R. C. (2001). Online tables of contents for books: Effect on usage. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 89(1), 29-36. Munchen, K.G. S. (1998). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final report (UBCIM publications, vol.19). Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr.pdf Naun, C.C. (2010). Next generation OPACs: A cataloging viewpoint. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48, 330-342. Online Computer Library Center. (2009). Online catalogs what users and librarians want. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf Open Metadata Registry (2010). About The Registry. Retrieved from http://metadataregistry.org/about.html Orden, R. V. (1990). Content-enriched access to electronic information: Summaries of selected research. Library Hi Tech, 8(3), 27-32. O'Reilly, T. (2005, September 30). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html Orna, L. (1992). Information design and information services: What information professionals should know about design, in order to deliver value-added information products. Aslib Proceedings, 44(9), pp.305-308. Pappas, E., & Herendeen, A. (2000). Enhancing bibliographic records with tables of contents derived from OCR technologies at the American Museum of Natural History Library. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(4), 61-72. Pattern, D. (2007). Are you happy with your OPAC? Library Information Update, 6(10), 32-34. Penn Library.(2006). About PennTags. Retrieved from http://www.library.upenn.edu/sitedocs/prototypes/about.html Rush, J. E. (1997). Monograph tables of contents in support of acquistions and online catalog access. Information Service & Use, 17(4), 242-247. Šauperl, A. (2002). Subject determination during the cataloging process. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, Inc. Strader, C. R. (2009). Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress subject headings. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(4), 243-250. The Australian Defence Force Academy Library (2013). Academy library, UNSW Canberra. Retrieved from http://lib.unsw.adfa.edu.au/ The Library of Congress (2002). Library of Congress table of contents survey results. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/tocsurveyresults.html The Library of Congress (2008). The Bibliographic Enrichment Advisory Team. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/beat/ The Library of Congress (n.d.). Bibliographic Framework Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/ The Library of Congress. (2008). On the record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the future of bibliographic control. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf The North Carolina State University Library (n.d.). The North Carolina State University Library. Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/ The Ohio State University Library (2012). The Ohio State University Libraries. Retrieved from http://library.osu.edu/ Thomas, S. E. (2000). The catalog as portal to the Internet. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/thomas_paper.html Tyckoson, D. A. (1992). Enhancing access to information. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 13(3-4), 1-28. University of Colorado at Boulder Library (n.d.). University Libraries CU-Boulder. Retrieved from http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/ University of Oxford Bodleian Library (2013). Bodleian Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/home University of Toronto Library (2009). University of Toronto Libraries. Retrieved from http://onesearch.library.utoronto.ca/ Villanova University Falvey Memorial Library (2009). Falvey Memorial Library: Villanova University. Retrieved from http://library.villanova.edu/ Wakimoto, J. C. (2009). Scope of the library catalog in times of transition. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(5), 409-426. Westcott, J., Chappell, A., & Lebel, C. (2009). LibraryThing for libraries at Claremont. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), 78-81. Wheeler, W. J. (2000). Scanning book tables of contents: A preliminary report on costs and procedures. The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 13(1), 21-25. Wichita State University Libraries (2012). Welcome to WSU Libraries. Retrieved from http://libraries.wichita.edu/ablah/ Worldcat users can now add content to records. (2006). Advanced Technology Libraries, 35(5), 1-11. Yang, S., & Hofmann, M. (2011). Next generation or current generation? A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada. Library Hi Tech, 29(2), 266-300. Zhang, Y., & Salaba, A. (2012). What Do Users Tell Us about FRBR-Based Catalogs. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 705-723. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5027 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目錄乃圖書館服務的基礎,也是使用者取得圖書館館藏的主要入口之一。提升目錄的功能與查詢效益,是圖書資訊界長期以來關注的議題。書目加值是改善目錄的途徑之一,即在圖書館目錄提供的制式書目資訊之外,增加額外的相關訊息,如:目次、摘要、封面等,協助使用者辨識與選擇所需資源。不少研究顯示使用者有書目加值的需求,然而編目館員為書目加值的實際執行者,卻鮮少研究探討編目館員對書目加值的看法,及圖書館對書目加值的了解與重視程度。爰此,本研究調查國內大學圖書館實施書目加值的情況,也探索編目館員對於書目加值的認識與看法,包括從事書目加值的經驗、遭遇困難與影響因素等。
本研究分兩階段進行,第一階段透過問卷調查法,調查國內162所大學圖書館進行書目加值工作的實際情況及各圖書館對於書目加值的看法;第二階段訪談14位大學圖書館編目館員,深入探索其對於書目加值的認知與建議,並了解他們在實施書目加值的經驗、遭遇的困難與影響因素。 問卷研究結果顯示,124份有效問卷中有56所大學圖書館實施書目加值,加值館藏類型以「中文紙本圖書」、「西文紙本圖書」及「視聽資料」為主,加值項目以「封面」、「摘要」與「其他網站」居多。書目加值多以「提供外部資訊的超連結」呈現,書目加值資訊的來源以編目館員提供的比例較高。此外,由訪談的結果可知,館員多認同書目加值的價值,也相信使用者有書目加值的需求,對未來提供書目加值服務持贊同態度。館員認為書目加值的未來,與鏈結開放資料、大數據、資源探索服務及WebPAC的呈現介面相關。在從事書目加值的過程中,加值來源包含由館員提供、由廠商或系統提供及由使用者提供,當圖書館的加值來源不同,實施書目加值的過程會遭遇不同的困難。影響書目加值實施的因素,包括館員、主管、使用者、組織氛圍、圖書館規模、經費、系統、時間、加值品質與業務量等面向,若欲實施須衡量諸多條件。從事書目加值的人才需具備能力、經驗與人格特質三方條件,未來可朝這三方面培養所需人才。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The library catalog is the main finding tool for items owned or made available by a library. How to enhance and enrich the library catalog to improve its functionality and efficiency has become one of the major concerns of the library and information science field. Studies have revealed that enriched and enhanced bibliographic records are welcomed by catalog users. However, what do catalogers, who are the actual doers of the cataloging task, think about the bibliographic record enhancements? So far, we do not know much. The aim of this study is to explore the question from the perspective of library catalogers. The purpose is twofold: (1) to survey and investigate the status quo of the OPAC enhancements services provided by university and college libraries in Taiwan, and (2) to acquire knowledge about the catalogers’ understanding, opinions, and experiences of bibliographic record enhancements.
This study includes two stages. First, the researcher carried out a questionnaire survey of 162 university and college libraries in Taiwan to investigate the state of their bibliographic enhancements. 124 institutions (76.5%) responded. Second, 14 library catalogers were subsequently invited to participate in an in-depth interview about their opinions and experiences of the bibliographic enhancements services they provided. The results of the questionnaire survey indicate that 56 of the 124 responding university libraries have provided enhanced bibliographic records. The top three collection types chosen for enhancement are Chinese books, foreign language books and audio-visual materials. The three most common added items are table of contents, abstracts and other websites. The most common way for presenting enhanced bibliographic records is through providing hyperlinks to external information. The library catalogers are the major source for generating the enhanced information. In addition, most librarians tend to agree on the value and utility of bibliographic record enhancements. They also believe that users need enhanced bibliographic records. Their opinion on keeping or planning to serve bibliographic enhancements is generally positive. For the future development of bibliographic enhancements, the interviewees suggest that we should pay attention to the progress of linked open data, big data, web-scale discovery service, and the WebPAC interface. During the process of enhancing bibliographic records, different approaches may encounter different problems and difficulties. The factors that affect the implementation of bibliographic enhancements include librarians, library directors, users, organization environment, the library scale, budget and funds, ILS systems, time pressure, the quality of enhanced bibliographic records, and workloads. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-15T17:51:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R99126001-1.pdf: 4910605 bytes, checksum: b76d35fdd593e70e6dfdf5bf434f5d47 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘 要 I
ABSTRACT III 目 次 V 表 次 VII 圖 次 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題陳述 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 5 第四節 名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻分析 9 第一節 書目加值的內涵 9 第二節 書目加值實證研究 34 第三節 書目加值實施現況 40 第三章 研究設計與實施 53 第一節 研究方法 53 第二節 研究對象 55 第三節 研究設計與實施 56 第四節 資料處理與分析 58 第五節 研究步驟 59 第四章 問卷調查結果分析 63 第一節 圖書館基本資料分析 64 第二節 圖書館書目加值現況分析 70 第三節 圖書館對書目加值的看法 83 第五章 訪談結果分析 99 第一節 受訪者背景資料分析 99 第二節 書目加值的認知與經驗 102 第三節 從事書目加值的經驗 115 第四節 對大學圖書館實施書目加值的看法 132 第六章 綜合討論 171 第一節 大學圖書館實施書目加值的情形 171 第二節 館員對書目加值的看法與建議 176 第三節 從事書目加值的經驗與影響因素 182 第七章 結論與建議 185 第一節 結論 185 第二節 建議 189 第三節 進一步研究之建議 192 第四節 研究方法的省思 193 參考文獻 195 附錄一「國內大學圖書館書目加值之實施現況調查」問卷 209 附錄二 訪談同意書 216 附錄三 訪談大綱 217 附錄四 訪談內容分類編碼表 219 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 大學圖書館書目加值之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of Bibliographic Record Enhancement
at University Libraries in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張慧銖(Huei-Chu Chang),張郁蔚(Yu-Wei Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 書目加值,編目館員,大學圖書館,線上目錄, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Bibliographic record enhancement,Enriched bibliographic record,Library cataloger,Online public library catalog,OPAC enhancements,University library, | en |
dc.relation.page | 232 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf | 4.8 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。