請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50204完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 方煒 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Chi Yu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 游舒淇 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:32:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 方煒。2011。完全控制型植物工廠。初版。臺北：財團法人豐年社。
2. 方煒。2012a。台灣植物工廠發展現況與展望。出自〝精密設施工程與植物工場實用化技術研討會專輯〞。台南：行政院農業委員會台南區農改場。 3. 方煒。2012b。人工光型植物工廠。初版。臺北：財團法人豐年社。 4. 方煒。2014。泛用型水耕栽培床架。中華民國專利第 M489475 號。 5. 主婦聯盟環境保護基金會。網址：www.huf.org.tw/。上網日期：2015-08-15。 6. 行政院衛生福利部國民健康署。2012。衛福部國民健康署_每日飲食指南手冊。台北：行政院衛生福利部國民健康署。網址：www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/Books/manual_content25.asp。上網日期：2015-08-15。 7. 行政院衛生福利部國民健康署。2013。國民營養健康狀況變遷調查。台北：行政院衛生福利部國民健康署。網址：www.hpa.gov.tw/Bhpnet/Web/News/News.aspx?No=201402280001。上網日期：2015-08-15。 8. 行政院財政部關務署進出口資料統計。2015。台北：行政院財政部關務署。網址：web.customs.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=63008&ctNode=13176。上網日期：2015-09-01。 9. 周晚來、劉文科、楊其長。2011。光對蔬菜硝酸鹽累積的影響及其機理。華北農學報 26(S2): 125-130。 10. 周晚來、劉文科、聞婧、楊其長。2011。短連續光照下水培生菜品質指標變化及其關聯性分析。中國生態農業學報。19(6)：1319-1323。 11. 邱輝龍、範明仁。1998)。花青素與花色之表現。中國園藝 44(2)： 102-115。 12. 吳靜美。2015。最新營養素，吃出抗癌力。常春月刊 385。 13. 高德錚。2012。蔬菜植物工廠發展現況。台中區農業改良場 102 年度專題討論專集。 14. 許莉、劉世琦、李連東、梁慶玲、于文艷。2007。不同光質對葉用萵苣光合作用及葉綠素螢光的影響。中國農學通報。23(1)：96-100。 15. 張福嫚。2001。初版。設施園藝學。北京：中國農業大學出版。 16. 游舒淇、張明毅、鄔家琪、鍾興穎、方煒。2013。不同光量對紫甘藍芽生長與抗氧化能力之影響。2013 年生物機電與農機科技論文發表會論文集。 17. 游舒淇、鍾伯承、吳明憲、阮鈺琳。2013。促進根部活性的潮汐灌溉立體栽培層架之研製。2013 產業先進設備專題實作競賽作品輯。 18. 楊其長、魏靈玲、劉文科、程瑞鋒。2012。植物工廠系統與實踐。初版。北京：化學工業出版社。 19. 楊書瑋。2016。降低潮汐式淹灌系統之養液溫度允許於較高氣溫環境下栽培波士頓萵苣。碩士論文。台北：台灣大學生物產業機電工程學研究所。 20. 鄭志榮。2002。園藝設施學。初版。北京：中國農業出版社。 21. 劉冠伶、方煒。2011。植物工廠量產低硝酸鹽萵苣之研究。2011 年生物機電與農機科技論文發表會論文集。 22. 劉曉英、徐志剛、焦學磊、陳衛平。2012。可調 LED 光源系統設計及其對菠菜生長的影響。農業工程學報 28(1): 208-212。 23. 鄭曉蕾、丸尾達、朱月林。2011。植物工廠條件下光質對散葉萵苣生長和葉燒邊發生的影響。江蘇農業科學 (6): 270-272。 24. 鍾興穎、張明毅、鄔家琪、方煒。2012。不同光質對紅橡萵苣生長與品質之影響。2012 年生物機電與農機科技論文發表會論文集。 25. 松本恵子、多田雄一、清水浩、澁澤栄。2009。ロユ③яФユヵ⑦ (Raphanus sativus L.‘Kaiwaredaikon’) ソ生育れプヂ抗酸化活性ズ与りペ光強度ソ影響。植物環境工学 21(3): 117-122。 26. Bahorun, T., A. Luximon‐Ramma, A. Crozier and O. I. Aruoma. 2004. Total phenol, flavonoid, proanthocyanidin and vitamin C levels and antioxidant activities of Mauritian vegetables. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84(12), 1553-1561. 27. Both, A. J., Albright, L. D. and Langhans, R. W. 1997. Coordinated management of daily PAR integral and carbon dioxide for hydroponic lettuce production. II Modelling Plant Growth, Environmental Control and Farm Management in Protected Cultivation 456, 45-52. 28. Bunning, M. L., P. A. Kendall, M. B. Stone, F. H. Stonaker and C. Stushnoff. 2010. Effects of seasonal variation on sensory properties and total phenolic content of 5 lettuce cultivars. Journal of food science 75(3): S156-S161. 29. Caldwell, C. R. 2003. Alkylperoxyl radical scavenging activity of red leaf lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L.) phenolics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51(16): 4589-4595. 30. Cao, G., E. Sofic., and R. L. Prior. 1996. Antioxidant capacity of tea and common vegetables. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 44(11): 3426-3431. 31. Chalker-Scott, L. 1999. Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochemistry and photobiology 70: 1-9. 32. Chu, Y. F., J. I. Sun, X. E. Wu, and R. H. Liu. 2002. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of common vegetables. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 50(23): 6910-6916. 33. Collier, G. F. and Tibbitts, T. W. 1984. Effects of Relative Humidity and Root Temperature on Calcium Concentration and Tipburn. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci, 109(2), 128-131. 34. Engelmann, T. W. 1883. Bacterium photometricum. Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 30(1), 95-124. 35. FAO 2014. Food and Nutrition in Numbers. Available at: www.fao.org/3/a-i4175e.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2015. 36. Feskanich, D., R. G. Ziegler, D. S. Michaud, E. L. Giovannucci, F. E. Speizer, W. C. Willett and G. A. Colditz. 2000. Prospective study of fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of lung cancer among men and women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 92(22): 1812-1823. 37. Fu, W., Li, P., Wu, Y. and Tang, J. 2012. Effects of different light intensities on anti-oxidative enzyme activity, quality and biomass in lettuce. Hort. Sci, 39, 129-134. 38. Gent, M. P.N. 2014. Effect of daily light integral on composition of hydroponic lettuce. hortScience, 49(2), 173-179. 39. Horbowicz, M., R. Kosson, A. Grzesiuk and H. Dębski. 2008. Anthocyanins of fruits and vegetables-their occurrence, analysis and role in human nutrition. Vegetable crops research bulletin 68: 5-22. 40. Johkan, M., K. Shoji, F. Goto, S. N. Hashida and T. Yoshihara. 2010. Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. HortScience 45(12): 1809-1814. 41. Khanam, U. K. S., S. Oba, E. Yanase and Y. Murakami. 2012. Phenolic acids, flavonoids and total antioxidant capacity of selected leafy vegetables. Journal of Functional Foods 4(4): 979-987. 42. Kim, H. H., R. M. Wheeler, J. C.Sager and G. D. Goins. 2004. A comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of lettuce grown under red and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with and without supplemental green LEDs. Acta Hort 659: 467-475. 43. Kimmins, J. P,. 1997. Forest ecology. 2rd ed., pp.153-179.Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey. 44. Kong, S. W., H. Y. Chung, M. Y. Chang and W. Fang. 2015. The contribution of different spectral sections to increase fresh weight of boston lettuce. HortScience 50(7): 1006-1010. 45. Kozai, T., C. Kubota, C. Chun, F. Afreen and K. Ohyama. 2000. Necessity and concept of the closed transplant production system. In “Transplant production in the 21st century”. 3-19. Springer Netherlands. 46. Kozai, T., K. Ohyama and C. Chun. 2005. Commercialized closed systems with artificial lighting for plant production. In “V International Symposium on Artificial Lighting in Horticulture 711”. 61-70. 47. Liu, R. H. 2003. Health benefits of fruit and vegetables are from additive and synergistic combinations of phytochemicals. The American journal of clinical nutrition 78(3): 517S-520S. 48. Liu, X., S. Ardo, M. Bunning, J. Parry, K. Zhou, C. Stushnoff and P. Kendall. 2007. Total phenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in Colorado. LWT-Food Science and Technology 40(3), 552-557. 49. Llorach, R., A. Martínez-Sánchez, F. A. Tomás-Barberán, M. I. Gil and F. Ferreres. 2008. Characterisation of polyphenols and antioxidant properties of five lettuce varieties and escarole. Food Chemistry 108(3): 1028-1038. 50. Machlin, L. J. and A. Bendich. 1987. Free radical tissue damage: protective role of antioxidant nutrients. The FASEB Journal 1(6): 441-445. 51. Mancinelli, A. L. 1990. Interaction between light quality and light quantity in the photoregulation of anthocyanin production. Plant Physiology, 92(4): 1191-1195. 52. Mulabagal, V., M. Ngouajio, A. Nair, Y. Zhang, A. L. Gottumukkala and M. G. Nair. 2010. In vitro evaluation of red and green lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) for functional food properties. Food chemistry 118(2): 300-306. 53. Nicolle, C., N. Cardinault, E. Gueux, L. Jaffrelo, E. Rock, A. Mazur and C. Rémésy. 2004. Health effect of vegetable-based diet: lettuce consumption improves cholesterol metabolism and antioxidant status in the rat. Clinical Nutrition 23(4): 605-614. 54. Nutrilite. 2015. America's phytonutrient report. Available at: www.pwrnewmedia.com/2009/nutrilite90921nmr/downloads/AmerciasPhytonutrientReport.pdf. Accessed 17 August 2015. 55. Oh, M.-M., E. E. Carey and C. Rajashekar. 2010. Regulated water deficits improve phytochemical concentration in lettuce. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 135(3): 223-229. 56. Okamoto, K., T. Yanagi and S. Kondo. 1996. Growth and morphogenesis of lettuce seedlings raised under different combinations of red and blue light. In “II Workshop on Environmental Regulation of Plant Morphogenesis 435”. 149-158. 57. Ragazzi, E. and G. Veronese. 1973. Quantitative analysis of phenolics compounds after thin-layer chromatographic separation. Journal of Chromatography A 77: 369-375. 58. Rice-Evans, C., N. Miller and G. Paganga. 1997. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends in plant science 2(4): 152-159. 59. Son, K. H. and M. M. Oh. 2013. Leaf shape, growth, and antioxidant phenolic compounds of two lettuce cultivars grown under various combinations of blue and red light-emitting diodes. HortScience 48(8): 988-995. 60. Stutte, G. W., S. Edney, and G. Newsham. 2010. Effects of UV light on anthocyanin content of red leaf lettuce under narrow and broad band light sources. In “Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Plant Growth Regulation Society of America”. 104-109. Plant Growth Regulation Society of America. 61. Tsuda, T., F. Horio, K. Uchida, H. Aoki, and T. Osawa. 2003. Dietary cyanidin 3-O-β-D-glucoside-rich purple corn color prevents obesity and ameliorates hyperglycemia in mice. The Journal of nutrition 133(7): 2125-2130. 62. Tsuda, T. 2008. Regulation of adipocyte function by anthocyanins; possibility of preventing the metabolic syndrome. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 56(3): 642-646. 63. Tsuda, T. 2012. Dietary anthocyanin‐rich plants: biochemical basis and recent progress in health benefits studies. Molecular nutrition and food research 56(1): 159-170. 64. USDA. 2014. Basic Report: 11257, Lettuce, red leaf, raw: 1980-2014. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 27. Washington, D.C.: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Available at: ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/listSon. Accessed 11 September 2015. Accessed 28 August 2015. 65. USDA. 2015. Yearbook Tables. Supply and Utilization: Fresh Market. Available at: www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/vegetables-and-pulses-data/yearbook-tables.aspx. Accessed 13 August 2015. 66. Vlahos, J. C., E. Heuvelink and G. F. P. Martakis. 1991. A growth analysis study of three achimenes cultivars grown under three light regimes. Scientia horticulturae 46(3): 275-282. 67. Wang, J., Yang, Q., Tong, Y. and Lu, W. 2016. Leaf morphology, photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) exposed to different ratios of red light to blue light. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 250. 68. WHO. www.who.int/en/. Accessed 14 August 2015. 69. Wikipedia. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%8A%B1%E9%9D%92%E7%B4%A0. Accessed 06 June. 2016. 70. Wintermans, J. F. G. M. and A. De Mots. 1965. Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their phenophytins in ethanol. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biophysics including Photosynthesis 109(2): 448-453. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50204 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 全人工光型植物工廠可精確地控制栽培環境參數，有計畫地全年穩態量產高品質且高營養的蔬菜，但電能消耗占將近 2.5 ~ 3 成的作業成本。在降低電費與電力能耗的考量上常見做法為利用離峰電力、透過人工光源光譜與光量的調整並施以較高濃度二氧化碳來促進植物光合作用的進行進而增加產量或縮短產期，但較少對植物地下部生長環境進行探討及改善。植物工廠內常見的栽培系統包括薄膜養液法 (NFT) 與湛水式栽培系統 (DFT)。
本研究有兩個研究方向，首先探討虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統 (siphonic type ebb and flood system) 應用於三種紅葉、兩種綠葉萵苣 (Lactuca sativa L.) 與歐洲芝麻菜 (Eruca sativa Mill.) 量產之可行性。以 DFT 系統為對照，探討虹吸式淹灌系統的不同淹灌週期對植物生長與二次代謝物累積之影響，並比較兩系統的耗電、用水量等。 由紅葉、綠葉萵苣與芝麻菜在由播種到採收的過程中的總耗電狀況的比較可知，生產相同鮮重的耗電比例約為 3: 1: 2，此比例可作為產品定價的參考。虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統中 5/60 淹灌週期可比 DFT 系統節省 93.8% 泵浦能耗，節省近七成的營養液使用量。紅葉萵苣成長較慢，除非售價較高，在商業上的獲利度比起綠葉萵苣少了許多。但紅葉萵苣中具抗氧化能力的二次代謝物如總酚與花青素等之含量比綠葉萵苣高出許多，此濃度亦受人工光源光質的影響，本研究第二個研究方向即針對光質對萵苣生長與二次代謝物含量之影響進行探討，進而探尋各品系作物不同生長階段的較佳光源與光量。 本研究亦針對各栽培條件下的電力產能 (Power Yield, PY) 與光子產能 (Quantum Yield, QY) 進行計算，由此些量化數據的比較有助於建立地上部最佳的光質組合與搭配的地下部最佳的潮汐淹灌週期與包括其他環境參數的栽培標準作業程序，評估各項栽培條件、環境參數與使用的硬體等的綜合優劣程度，更有利於與前人栽培相同作物的比較、不同批次不同參數設定條件下的比較、不同栽培系統的比較，亦有利於各不同作物間的比較。期望此些成果可提供發展中的植物工廠產業界參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Plant factory using artificial light (PFAL) can precisely control aero and root-zone environment of plants, enabling the steady annual production of high quality and nutrient-rich vegetables. However, the electricity cost is nearly 25 to 30% of the operating cost. In all attempts of reducing electricity fee and consumptions, off-peak operation, selective spectra and light intensity with carbon-dioxide enrichment are common practices. Few research has focusing on the adjustment of root-zone environment. Most common culturing systems in PFAL are nutrient film technique (NFT) and deep flow technique (DFT). The purposes of this study has two folds. The first is to investigate on the feasibility of the siphonic type ebb and flood system in producing 3 cultivars of red leaf lettuce, 2 cultivars of green leaf lettuce and rucola. Use DFT system as the check. Compare not only the growth, the secondary metabolites, but also the electricity and water consumptions of two culturing systems.
The study on power consumption from sowing to harvesting same fresh weight of red leaf, green leaf lettuce and rucola shown that the ratio is about 3: 1: 2. This ratio can be the guideline on pricing. Siphonic type ebb and flood system at 5/60 interval can saved 93.8% of pumping energy and saved almost 70% on nutrient solution consumption. Red leaf lettuce grows much slowly but with high anti-oxidizing capability, should have higher price. The concentration of secondary metabolites are highly influenced by the spectra of artificial light. The second purpose of this study is to investigate on the effects of the lighting spectra and intensity on the fresh weight accumulation and secondary metabolites concentration and to find the proper light source for particular cultivar of red/green lettuce and rucola. Power yield (PY, in gFW per degree of electric energy consumed) and quantum yield (QY, in gFW per mole of quanta) of all cultivars produced in this study were calculated. These quantitative measures can be very helpful in evaluating the proper light source with proper period-settings of ebb and flood system, evaluating various growth conditions, comparing with other researcher’s outcomes and compare among crops, among various culturing system. Hopefully, all these comparisons can be helpful to the emerging plant factory industry. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:32:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03631008-1.pdf: 4246236 bytes, checksum: 0c79921e25a3ab2072f98b302984ff0f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝……………………………………………………………………...i
摘要………………………………………………………………….….ii 目錄…………………………………………………………………….vi 圖目錄………………………………………………………………..…x 表目錄………………………………………………………………...xiv 第一章 前言與研究目的 1 1.1 前言 1 1.2 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 2.1 蔬菜食用現況 5 2.1.1 臺灣與美國蔬菜食用現況 5 2.1.2 蔬菜的營養價值 9 2.2 植物工廠 13 2.2.1 植物工廠發展沿革及其發展意義 13 2.2.2 植物工廠定義及分類 16 2.2.3 水耕栽培系統 19 2.3 影響植物生長之因素 25 2.3.1 缺水逆境 25 2.3.2 光 26 2.3.3 光譜對植物生長之影響 26 2.3.4 光量對植物生長之影響 28 2.4 植物體的光合色素及二次代謝物 30 2.4.1 葉綠素 30 2.4.2 花青素 30 2.4.3 總酚 31 第三章 材料與方法 33 3.1 試驗環境 33 3.1.1 環境控制 (台大植物工廠) 34 3.1.2 栽培層架類型 (台大植物工廠) 35 3.1.3 試驗設備與儀器 38 3.2 栽培作物 40 3.3 試驗養液成分 40 3.4 分析藥品與試劑 41 3.5 量測方法 42 3.5.1 生長性狀量測 42 3.5.2 總葉綠素分析 42 3.5.3 花青素測定 43 3.5.4 單株花青素含量 43 3.5.5 總酚含量分析方法 44 3.5.6 單株總酚含量計算 44 3.5.7 硝酸鹽含量分析方法 44 3.5.8 統計分析方法 45 3.6 研究方法 46 3.6.1 以不同淹灌週期之虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培紅葉萵苣 46 3.6.2 以不同淹灌週期之虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培綠葉萵苣 50 3.6.3 不同光質及搭配虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培紅葉萵苣 52 3.6.4 不同光質及搭配虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培綠葉萵苣 57 3.6.5 不同光質與虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培綠葉萵苣之再探討 59 3.6.6 以不同淹灌週期之虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培芝麻菜 61 3.6.7 不同光質及搭配虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培芝麻菜 63 3.6.8 電力產能、光子產能、花青素電力產能與花青素光子產能 65 第四章 結果與討論 69 4.1 以不同淹灌週期之虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培紅葉萵苣 69 4.2 以不同淹灌週期之虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培綠葉萵苣 78 4.3 不同光質及搭配虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培紅葉萵苣 86 4.4 不同光質及搭配虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培綠葉萵苣 96 4.5 不同光質與虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培綠葉萵苣之再探 106 4.6 以不同淹灌週期之虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培芝麻菜 113 4.7 不同光質及搭配虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統栽培芝麻菜 117 4.8 電力產能與光子產能 121 4.8.1 不同淹灌週期與不同光質栽培下之紅葉萵苣電力產能與光子產 能計算 122 4.8.2 不同淹灌週期與不同光質栽培下之綠葉萵苣電力產能與光子產 能計算 127 4.8.3 不同淹灌週期與不同光質栽培下之芝麻菜電力產能與光子產能 計算 133 4.9 花青素電力產能與花青素光子產能 137 4.9.1 不同淹灌週期與不同光質栽培下之紅葉萵苣花青素電力成本與 花青素光子產能計算 138 4.10 虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統與湛水式系統用水量與泵浦能耗比較 141 4.10.1 虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統與湛水式循環系統用水量比較 142 4.10.2 虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統與湛水式循環系統泵浦能耗比較 144 第五章 結論 147 第六章 建議 153 6.1 虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統週期之設定 153 6.2 栽培光量與光週期之設定 155 參考文獻 157 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 萵苣 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 植物工廠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 潮汐淹灌系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 芝麻菜 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 二次代謝物 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 植物工廠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 潮汐淹灌系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 萵苣 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 芝麻菜 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 二次代謝物 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Rucola | en |
| dc.subject | Plant Factory | en |
| dc.subject | Ebb and Flood | en |
| dc.subject | Lettuce | en |
| dc.subject | Secondary metabolites | en |
| dc.subject | Rucola | en |
| dc.subject | Lettuce | en |
| dc.subject | Ebb and Flood | en |
| dc.subject | Secondary metabolites | en |
| dc.subject | Plant Factory | en |
| dc.title | 虹吸式潮汐淹灌系統應用於植物工廠內萵苣與芝麻菜栽培之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Applying Siphonic Type Ebb and Flood System in Plant Factory for Producing Lettuce and Rucola | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡致榮,羅筱鳳 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 植物工廠,潮汐淹灌系統,萵苣,芝麻菜,二次代謝物, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Plant Factory,Ebb and Flood,Lettuce,Rucola,Secondary metabolites, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 164 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601836 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業機電工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物機電工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.15 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。