請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50182
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周家蓓 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Chun Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林奕君 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:31:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 路平專案調查報告, 監察院, Editor. 2008.
2. Arudi, R., B. Pickering, and J. Flading, Planning and implementation of a management system for utility cuts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000(1699): p. 42-48. 3. Wilde, W., C. Grant, and G. White. Controlling and reducing the frequency of pavement utility cuts. in Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences. 2003. 4. Guthrie, W.S., et al. Quantifying the Effect of Utility Cuts on the Remaining Service Life of Flexible Pavements in Northern Utah. in Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting. 2015. 5. Lakkavalli, V., B. Poon, and S. Dhanoa. Challenges in Utility Coordination and Implementation of Pavement Degradation Fees. in TAC 2015: Getting You There Safely-2015 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada//ATC: Destination sé curité routiÃぴ re-2015 CongrÃぴ s et Exposition de l'Association des transports du Canada. 2015. 6. 廖吳章, 挖掘道路維護管理方法之研究, in 土木工程學系碩士班. 2000, 中華大學. 7. 陳逢源 and 陳仙州, 論道路挖埋管線稽查制度. 台灣公路工程, 2004. 31(6): p. 2-19. 8. 陳逢源 and 陳仙州, 淺談挖掘道路管理辦法. 台灣公路工程, 2005. 31(8): p. 20-37. 9. 許自儀, 市區道路挖掘對服務品質影響之研究, in 土木工程學研究所. 2005, 國立臺灣大學. 10. 魏光譽, 縣市政府提升道路挖掘埋設維生管線管理成效之研究-以桃園縣為例, in 土木工程學系碩士在職專班. 2008, 國立中央大學. 11. Chow, C. and V. Troyan, Quantifying damage from utility cuts in asphalt Pavement by using San Francisco's Pavement Management data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999(1655): p. 1-7. 12. 高健洋, 分析道路管溝底層回填料之沉陷, in 土木工程學系專班. 2010, 成功大學. 13. 王聰田, DCP工法應用於道路開挖管溝回填壓實度測定之研究, in 材料科學與工程學系. 2004, 義守大學. 14. Jensen, K.A., et al. Characterization of utility cut pavement settlement and repair techniques. in Proceedings of the 2005 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, August. 2005. 15. 徐瑞宏, 道路管線埋設對鋪面強度衰減之影響研究, in 土木工程學系研究所. 2010, 國立中央大學. 16. 推動道路平整方案, 行政院, Editor. 2008. 17. 鐘偉逞, 應用落錘撓度儀觀測路面結構強度之研究, in 土木工程研究所. 2000, 國立中央大學. 18. 道路成效評估利器工程永續發展契機, 內政部營建署專題報導, Editor. 2009. 19. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/CB74428A-C577-4A44-87D3-AFD16328C276/0/P0002962.JPG. 20. 廖啟州, 輕便型落錘式撓度儀量測鋪面回彈模數之研究, in 土木工程與防災科技研究所. 2004, 國立高雄應用科技大學. 21. Steinert, B.C., D.N. Humphrey, and M.A. Kestler. Portable falling weight deflectometers for tracking seasonal stiffness variations in asphalt surfaced roads. in Transportation Research Board Meeting, National Research Council, CD-ROM, Washington DC. 2006. 22. Wei, J.G. and B. Wang. PFWD's Application in the Evaluation of Structural Strength of Field Hot Regeneration Asphalt Pavement. in Advanced Materials Research. 2013. Trans Tech Publ. 23. Akbariyeh, N., et al. Estimation of Elastic Moduli of Flexible Pavement Layers from Deflections Measured by Lightweight Deflectometer. in Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting. 2016. 24. 黃博仁, 以LWD 及DCP 評估路基土壤強度之研究. 臺灣公路工程, 2012. 38(4-5): p. 35-57. 25. Nagato, A., The History and Application Examples of Portable FWD in Japan, in 6thEuropean FWD User Group Meeting 2010, Belgian Road Research Centre. 26. 市區道路鋪面養護管理績效檢測與道路考評作業整合測試-期末報告, 內政部營建署, Editor. 2015. 27. Asli, C., et al., Back-calculation of elastic modulus of soil and subgrade from portable falling weight deflectometer measurements. Engineering Structures, 2012. 34: p. 1-7. 28. Alshibli, K.A., M. Abu-Farsakh, and E. Seyman, Laboratory evaluation of the geogauge and light falling weight deflectometer as construction control tools. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2005. 17(5): p. 560-569. 29. Baltzer, S., et al. Practical use of light weight deflectometer for pavement design. in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields (BCR2A-09). 2009. 30. Icenogle, P. and M.S. Kabir, Evaluation of Non-Destructive Technologies for Construction Quality Control of HMA and PCC Pavements in Louisiana. 2013, Report. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Department of Transportation. 31. Kaakkurivaara, T., et al., Applicability of portable tools in assessing the bearing capacity of forest roads. SILVA FENNICA, 2015. 49(2). 32. 林恒丞, 應用輕便型落重撓度儀評估柔性鋪面強度之研究, in 防災科技研究所. 2009, 東南技術學院. 33. International, A., ASTM E2583-07(2011),Standard Test Method for Measuring Deflections with a Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD). 2011: West Conshohocken, PA, 2011. 34. Lin, D.-F., C.-C. Liau, and J.-D. Lin, Factors affecting portable falling weight deflectometer measurements. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2006. 132(6): p. 804-808. 35. Steinert, B.C., D.N. Humphrey, and M.A. Kestler, Portable falling weight deflectometer study. 2005. 36. Lukanen, E.O., R. Stubstad, and R. Briggs, Temperature predictions and adjustment factors for asphalt pavement. 2000. 37. Chen, D.-H., et al., Temperature correction on falling weight deflectometer measurements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000(1716): p. 30-39. 38. Mun Park, H., Y. Richard Kim, and S. Park, Temperature correction of multiload-level falling weight deflectometer deflections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002(1806): p. 3-8. 39. Kim, Y.R., B.O. Hibbs, and Y.-C. Lee, Temperature correction of deflections and backcalculated asphalt concrete moduli. Transportation Research Record, 1995(1473). 40. Straube, E. and D. Jansen. Temperature Correction of Falling-Weight-Deflectometer Measurements. in Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Two Volume Set: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference (BCR2A'09), June 29-July 2 2009, Unversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA. 2009. CRC Press. 41. Dawson, T., et al. Global Procedure for Temperature Adjustment of Measured Pavement Deflection Data Based on the LTPP Seasonal Monitoring Program. in Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting. 2016. 42. Park, D.-Y., N. Buch, and K. Chatti, Effective layer temperature prediction model and temperature correction via falling weight deflectometer deflections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001(1764): p. 97-111. 43. 市區道路鋪面損壞檢測系統與平坦度驗收機制之修正, 內政部營建署, Editor. 2010. 44. Nazarian, S. and G. Alvarado, Impact of temperature gradient on modulus of asphaltic concrete layers. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2006. 18(4): p. 492-499. 45. 鐘美娟, 衝擊式撓度指標評估路面強度之研究, in 土木工程學系. 1997, 國立臺灣大學. 46. Picoux, B., A. El Ayadi, and C. Petit, Dynamic response of a flexible pavement submitted by impulsive loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009. 29(5): p. 845-854. 47. El Ayadi, A., et al., An improved dynamic model for the study of a flexible pavement. Advances in Engineering Software, 2012. 44(1): p. 44-53. 48. Shah, H., Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) produced from limestone fines and other byproducts. 2012. 49. Huang, L.-J., Y.-N. Sheen, and D.-H. Le, Numerical Analysis of Excavation Backfilled with Soil-based Controlled Low-Strength Materials: Part II-Steady State Elastodynamic Analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2014(ijetae). 50. AASHTO, G., ‘Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 1993. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50182 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 為維護既有管線或新設管線,管線挖埋回填工程不可避免,然由於目前多數管線皆埋設於道路鋪面下方,反覆開挖回填嚴重影響道路鋪面服務績效,也造成鋪面維護管理的困難,因此,了解管線對管線挖埋工程對鋪面品質之影響為一重要課題。
行政院已於路平方案中推動相關措施改善,各縣市亦訂定道路挖掘管理條例,建立管線挖掘回填之施工標準程序,例如訂定管線深度下限、要求管溝回填材料強度、並規定於期限內完成路面修復工程等。但道路上仍常見與管線相關之破壞,推測除管線單位未依規範施作之外,可能為此三項目無法完整反應鋪面結構整體績效,故本研究建立一個評估鋪面整體結構強度之簡易檢驗方式,來瞭解管線挖埋對鋪面結構強度造成之影響。 本研究選擇使用輕型落重撓度儀建立一套於管線挖埋回填區域之結構強度檢驗方法,訂定針對管線挖埋回填區域鋪面強度檢測之合適之落重組合、施測點位及檢測程序,分別於管挖施作前,管挖完成假修復以及路面修復銑鋪完成等三階段對同一區域之多點位進行結構強度檢測,並發展檢測結果之溫度校估式,將檢測結果校估至同一基準上以利分析比較。研究於臺北市、新北市市區6個實際管線挖埋工程進行管挖前、中、及後三階段檢測及於其完工後持續維持約半年的檢測,由檢測結果得知,原鋪面整體結構強度E_LWD多為400至800 MPa,管線挖埋工程完工後管線挖埋回填區域之鋪面整體結構強度E_LWD因為填CLSM填充料而明顯提升至1200至1800 MPa。本研究另建立有限元素模型,模擬以輕型落重撓度儀檢測管線挖埋前後鋪面結構強度之變化,其模擬結果與實測結果具有相同趨勢且數值合理。故本研究建立之檢驗方法確實可反映管挖前後針對管挖區域檢驗鋪面結構之相對變化以及管線挖埋回填區域與未開挖區域之差異,並探討以其評估管線挖埋回填品質之可行性,有其應用價值。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Utility pipelines are essential facilities and most of them are separately placed underneath the urban roads in Taiwan. To install and maintain, pavement is repeatedly cut and excavated. In the consequence, the pavement service performance is impacted seriously and the pavement management becomes a challenge. To overcome this problem, Taiwan Executive Yuan promoted the Road Smoothing Project and requested each city/county municipal government must set the standards for requiring the minimum depth of pipeline, the quality of refill material, and the construction process. However, the results were not very effective. The pavement distresses related to utility cuts, such as the reflection cracking in the cut interface and the alligator cracking in the repair area, still appear frequently. This paper presents a study of using Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD) to establish an inspection method to evaluate the influence of utility cuts in pavement structural capacity. The appropriate combination of drop height and load plate size of LWD, the templates of testing points, and inspection procedure were studied and recommended. Temperature adjustment model of the LWD test result was also developed by field tests in this research. In this study, seven in situ utility cuts constructions were conducted the LWD test in three stages, i.e. before utility cuts, after temporary repair, and after formal milling and overlay repair. In addition, four of them did the extra LWD test every two months after formal milling and overlay repair for about half year. According to the test results, the original structure capacity E_LWD were about 400 to 800 MPa, and the structure capacity E_LWD after utility cuts construction became 1200 to 1800 MPa due to using the Controlled Low Strength Materials (CLSM) as refilling materials. Moreover, the Finite Element (FEM) model of this inspection method were created to simulate the LWD tests. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:31:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03521515-1.pdf: 6026896 bytes, checksum: 3a842b497eb4c47fb5d78504503bd546 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員審定書 I
致謝 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究範圍及目的 1 1.3 研究方法及流程 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2.1 管線挖埋工程對鋪面品質影響之相關研究 3 2.1.1 管理層面 3 2.1.2 鋪面整體服務指標 6 2.1.3 道路平整度 7 2.1.4 結構強度 8 2.2 管線挖埋回填相關施工規範 11 2.3 鋪面結構強度檢測儀器選取及介紹 19 2.3.1 鋪面強度檢測儀器 19 2.3.2 輕型落重撓度儀 23 2.4 文獻回顧小結 28 第三章 管線挖埋回填區域鋪面強度檢驗程序建立 29 3.1 輕型落重撓度儀操作之標準程序 29 3.2 鋪面強度檢測之落重組合選取 34 3.2.1 落重高度選取 34 3.2.2 落重盤選取 36 3.3 鋪面強度檢測點位佈設 38 3.4 小結 40 第四章 鋪面強度檢測結果之溫度校估 41 4.1 鋪面強度檢測結果受溫度之影響 41 4.2 溫度校估實驗 47 4.2.1 實驗地點及時間 47 4.2.2 實驗結果 48 4.3 溫度校估式發展 51 第五章 管線挖埋回填區域鋪面強度檢測實例 58 5.1 鋪面強度檢測工程選擇 58 5.2 鋪面強度檢測工程實測 59 5.3 鋪面強度檢測結果與分析 62 第六章 有限元素分析 76 6.1 有限元素分析模型 76 6.1.1 鋪面結構幾何與各層參數 76 6.1.2 施加外力型式 79 6.1.3 有限元素模型元素模型幾何 79 6.2 模擬管線挖埋前後狀況 86 6.3 模擬輕型落重撓度儀使用不同落重盤之檢驗結果 88 6.4 各層強度敏感度測試 89 6.5 有限元素分析小結 92 第七章 結論與建議 93 7.1 結論 93 7.2 建議 94 參考文獻 96 附錄一、管線挖埋回填區域鋪面強度檢驗程序 100 附錄二、鋪面強度檢測結果 102 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 管線挖埋回填區域鋪面強度檢驗之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Structure Capacity Evaluation for Utility Cuts | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭振銘,陳怡先 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 管線挖埋工程,鋪面整體結構強度,輕型落重撓度儀(LWD),溫度校估,鋪面維護管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Utility Cuts Construction,Structural Capacity,Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD),Temperature Adjusted model,Pavement Maintenance Management, | en |
dc.relation.page | 127 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601889 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-04 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.89 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。