請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49690完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林寶秀(Bau-Show Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Yu Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉靖瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:42:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王詩雅，（2013），綠屋頂生命週期與成本效益評估，國立交通大學環境工程研究所，碩士論文，新竹。
2. 余文元，（2013），室內植栽對室內溫熱環境及空調節能效益之研究，國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所，碩士論文，臺北。 3. 林憲德，（2012），綠建築評估手冊-基本型，臺北：內政部建築研究所。 4. 林寶秀，（2014），立面綠化系統關鍵決策因素與微氣候調節效益，景觀領域國科會專題研究計畫研討會，p.44。 5. 林容安，（2013），國內薄層綠屋頂成本效益分析，國立臺北科技大學土木防災研究所，碩士論文，臺北。 6. 周炳宏，（2012），成本效益分析，2012教育部輔助技專校院建立特色典範計畫，太陽光電技術人才培育與產業管理分項計畫5-PV產業發展策略規劃與風險控管種子教材。p.1-16。 7. 周曉柔，（2013），建築工地圍籬垂直綠化之景觀效益評估，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所，碩士論文，臺北。 8. 郭昱瑩、余致力、蕭乃沂、林靜美，（2001），成本效益分析於公共政策的應用：以台北市設置大樓共用天然瓦斯自動遮斷閥為例，理論與政策，15(2)，1-24。 9. 張莉欣、陳裕星、嚴新富，（2004），台灣原生藤蔓類景觀植物之種苗繁殖與生育特性研究，行政院農業委員會農糧署九十三年度科技研究計畫研究報告13，1-9。 10. 陳祥，（2009），牆面綠化技術發展狀況及其應用，黑龍江農業科學，1，91-92。 11. 凌德麟，（1994），台北市立面景觀綠化之研究，臺北：臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。 12. 葉彥宏，（2012），城市綠屋頂成本效益分析，國立交通大學環境工程研究所，碩士論文，新竹。 13. 鄭維祐，（2012），綠屋頂生命週期與節能效益評估，國立交通大學環境工程研究所，碩士論文，新竹。 14. 鄭蘊欣，（2014），垂直綠化上植栽構圖對降溫效果之影響，國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀研究所，碩士論文，臺北。 15. 潘競恒，（2008），電子化政府計畫成本效益評估方法之研究，行政院研究發展考核委員會。 16. 蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪，（2002），環境保護之成本效益分析：理論、方法與應用，臺北：俊傑書局股份有限公司出版。 17. Azkorra, Z., Perez, G., Coma, J., Cabeza, L.F., Bures, S., Alvaro, J.E., Erkoreka, A. & Urrestarazu, M. (2015). Evaluation of green walls as a passive acoustic insulation system for buildings. Applied Acoustics, 89, 46-56. 18. Brunekreef, B. & Holgate, S. T. (2002). Air pollution and health. Lancet, 360, 1233-1242. 19. Berndtsson, J. C. (2010). Green roof performance towards management of runoff water quantity and quality: a review. Ecological Engineering, 36(4), 351-360. 20. Bartolucci, A. A., (2009). Describing and interpreting methodological and statistical techniques in meta-analyses. Biochemia Medica, 19(2), 127-136. 21. Carter, T. & Keeler, A. (2007). Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(3), 350-363. 22. Currie, B. A. & Bass, B. (2008). Estimate of air pollution mitigation with green plants and green roofs using the UFORE model. Urban Ecosyst, 11, 409-422. 23. Chiquet, C., Dover, J. W. & Mitchell, P. (2013). Birds and the urban environment: the value of green walls. Urban Ecosyst, 16, 453-462. 24. Chen, Q., Li, B. & Liu, X. (2013). An experimental evaluation of the living wall system in hot and humid climate. Energy Build, 61, 298-307. 25. Crawley, D. B., Pedersen, C. O., Lawrie, L. K. & Winkelmann, F. C. (2000). Energyplus: Energy simulation program. ASHRAE Journal, 42, 49-56. 26. Cameron, R. W.F., Taylor, J. E. & Emmett, M. R. (2014). What’s ‘cool’ in the world of green façades? How plant choice influences the cooling properties of green walls. Building and Environment, 73, 198-207. 27. Croeser, T. (2016). Biological potential in cities: An estimate from Melbourne. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16, 84-94. 28. Des Rosiers, F., Thériault, M., Kestens, Y. & Villeneuve, P. (2002). Landscaping and house values: An empirical investigation. J. Real Estate Res, 23, 139-161. 29. Djedjiga, R., Bozonneta, E. & Belarbia, R. (2015). Analysis of thermal effects of vegetated envelopes: Integration of a validated model in a building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 86, 93-103. 30. Fioretti, R., Palla, A., Lanza, L.G. & Principi, P. (2010). Green roof energy and water related performance in the Mediterranean climate. Building and Environment, 45, 1890-1904. 31. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A. & Öhrström, E. (2007). Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 8(2-3), 115-26. 32. Gao, X. & Asami, Y. (2007). Effect of urban landscape on land price in two Japanese cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 155-166. 33. Gregoire B. G. & Clausen J. C. (2011). Effect of a modular extensive green roof on stormwater runoff and water quality. Ecological Engineering, 37(6), 963-969. 34. Hunt, H. D. (2008). Green house values. Tierra Grande 2008, 15, 2. 35. Hanssen, S. V. & Viles, H. A., (2014). Can plants keep ruins dry? A quantitative assessment of the effect of soft capping on rainwater flows over ruined walls. Ecological Engineering, 71, 173-179. 36. Ichihara, K. & Cohen, J. P. (2011). New York City property values: What is the impact of green roofs on rental pricing? Lett. Spatial Resour. Sci., 4, 21-30. 37. Jaafar, B., Said, I., Md Reba, M. N. & Rasidi, M. H. (2013). Impact of Vertical Greenery System on Internal Building Corridors in the Tropic. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 558-568. 38. Joshi, S. V. & Ghosh, S. (2014). On the air cleansing efficiency of an extended green wall: A CFD analysis of mechanistic details of transport processes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 361, 101-110. 39. Jang, H. S., Kim, H. J. & Jeon, J. Y. (2015). Scale-model method for measuring noise reduction in residential buildings by vegetation. Building and Environment, 86, 81-88. 40. Köhler, M. (1993). Fassaden und Dachbergrunung. Stuttgart: Ulmer Fachbuch Landschaftsund Grunplanung. 41. Kontoleon, K. J. & Eumorfopoulou, E. A. (2010). The effect of the orientation and proportion of a plant-covered wall layer on the thermal performance of a building zone. Building and Environment, 45, 1287-1303. 42. Koyama, T., Yoshinaga, M., Maeda, K. & Yamauchi, A. (2015). Transpiration cooling effect of climber greenwall with an air gap on indoor thermal environment. Ecological Engineering, 83, 343-353. 43. Kim, J., Hong, T., Jeong, J., Koo, C. & Jeong, K. (2016). An optimization model for selecting the optimal green systems by considering the thermal comfort and energy consumption. Applied Energy, 169, 682-695. 44. Lin, S. L. & Lin, K. H. (2007). The Valuation of Health Effects Caused by Stationary Sources–Related SO2 Emissions: The Adaptation of Impact Pathway Approach in Taiwan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 131(1), 163-176. 45. Larsen, S. F., Filippín, C. & Lesino, G. (2014). Thermal simulation of a double skin façade with plants. Energy Procedia, 57, 1763-1772. 46. Larsen, S. F., Filippín, C. & Lesino, G. (2015). Modeling double skin green facades with traditional thermal simulation software.Solar Energy, 121, 56-67. 47. McPherson, E. G., Herrington, L. P. & Heisler, G. M. (1988). Impacts of Vegetation on Residential Heating and Cooling. Energy and Buildings, 12, 41-51. 48. Marchi M., Pulselli R. M., Marchettini, N., Pulselli, F. M., & Bastianoni, S. (2015). Carbon dioxide sequestration model of a vertical greenery system. Ecological Modelling, 306, 46-56. 49. Manso, M. & Castro-Gomes, J. (2015). Green wall systems: A review of their characteristics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 863-871. 50. Niu, H., Clark, C., Zhou, J. & Adriaens, P. (2010). Scaling of Economic Benefits from Green Roof Implementation in Washington, DC. Environment Science Technology, 44, 4302-4308. 51. Norton, B. A., Coutts, A. M., Livesley, S. J., Harris, R. J., Hunter, A. M. & Williams, N. S. G. (2015). Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 127-138. 52. Ottelé, M., Van Bohemen, H. D. & Fraaij, A. L. A. (2010). Quantifying the deposition of particulate matter on climber vegetation on living walls. Ecological Engineering, 36 (2), 154-162. 53. Perussia, F. (1990). Immagini di natura. Milano: ED Guerini Studio. 54. Peck, S. W., Callaghan, C., Kuhn, M. E. & Bass, B. (1999). Greenbacks from Green Roofs: Forging a New Industry in Canada. Status Report on Benefits, Barriers and Opportunities for Green Roof and Vertical Garden Technology Diffusion. Peck & Associates (P&A): Toronto, ON, Canada, p.78. 55. Palla, A., Gnecco, I. & Lanza, L. G. (2010). Hydrologic Restoration in the Urban Environment Using Green Roofs. Water, 2(2), 140-154. 56. Perini, K., Ottele, M., Fraaij,A.L. A., Haas,E. M. & Raiteri, R. (2011).Vertical greening systems and the effect on air flow and temperature on the building envelope. Building and Environment, 46, 2287-2294. 57. Perini, K. & Magliocco, A. (2012). The Integration of Vegetation in Architecture, Vertical and Horizontal Greened Surfaces. International Journal of Biology, 76, 80-91. 58. Perini, K. & Rosasco, P. (2013). Cost-benefit analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Building and Environment, 70, 110-121. 59. Price, A., Jones, E. C. & Jefferson, F. (2015). Vertical Greenery Systems as a Strategy in Urban Heat Island Mitigation. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 226(8), 247. 60. Roehr, D. & Laurenz J. (2008). Living skins: environmental benefits of green envelopes in the city context. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 113, 149-158. 61. Stec, W. J., van Paassen, A. H. C. & Maziarz, A. (2005). Modelling the double skin facade with plants. Energy and Buildings, 37, 419-427. 62. Susorova, I., Angulo, M., Bahrami, P. & Stephens, B. (2013). A model of vegetated exterior facades for evaluation of wall thermal performance. Building and Environment, 67, 1-13. 63. Sunakorn, P. & Yimprayoon, C. (2011). Thermal performance of biofacade with natural ventilation in the tropical climate. Procedia Eng, 21, 34-41. 64. Tomalty, R. & Komorowski, B. (2010). Curb appeal. Living Architect Monitor, 12, 26-27. 65. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influences recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421. 66. United Nations. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects, (pp.7). New York, NY: United Nations. 67. Van Woert, N. D., Rowe, D. B., Andresen, J. A., Rugh, C. L., Fernandez, R. T. & Xiao, L. (2005). Green roof stormwater retention: effects of roof surface, slope and media depth. J. Environ. Qual. 34 (3), 1036-1044. 68. Veisten, K., Smyrnova, Y., Klæboe, R., Hornikx, M., Mosslemi, M. & Kang J. (2012). Valuation of Green Walls and Green Roofs as Soundscape Measures: Including Monetised Amenity Values Together with Noise-attenuation Values in a Cost-benefit Analysis of a Green Wall Affecting Courtyards. Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 3770-3788. 69. Van Renterghem, T., Hornikx, M., Forssen, J. & Botteldooren, D. (2013). The potential of building envelope greening to achieve quietness. Building and Environment, 61, 34-44. 70. Willmott, C. J. (1982). Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 63, 1309-1313. 71. Wong, N. H., Tan, A. Y. K., Tan, P. Y. & Wong, N. C. (2009). Energy simulation of vertical greenery systems. Energy and Buildings, 41, 1401-1408. 72. Wong, N. H., Tan, A. Y. K., Tan, P.Y., Sia, A. & Wong, N. C. (2010a). Perception studies of vertical greenery systems in Singapore. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136, 330-338. 73. Wong, N. H., Tan, A. Y. K., Chen, Y., Sekar, K., Tan, P. Y., Chan, D., Chiang, K. & Wong, N. C. (2010b). Thermal evaluation of vertical greenery systems for building walls. Building and Environment, 45, 663-672. 74. Wong, N. H., Tan, A. Y. K., Tan, P. Y., Chiang, K. & Wong, N. C. (2010c). Acoustics evaluation of vertical greenery systems for building walls. Building and Environment, 45, 411-420. 75. Yoshimi, J. & Altan, H. (2011). Thermal simulations on the effects of vegetated walls on indoor building environments. Proceedings of Building Simulation 2011:12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Sydney, 1438-1443. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49690 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 相關研究證實立面綠化對環境具有許多效益，但是立面綠化系統在經濟上是否是可持續發展，則仍有待更多的檢視。本研究透過成本效益分析評估臺灣立面綠化系統，是否值得長期投資，並提供相關資訊作為未來立面綠化系統開發、推廣策略擬定之參考。
本研究主要以文獻資料蒐集分析法、訪談法、成本效益分析進行研究。首先以施工工法作為立面綠化產品系統分類的基準，將蒐集到的現行的立面綠化產品分為五大系統。在成本效益分析方面，蒐集現有立面綠化各項效益的實證研究，據此分別就個人、社會兩層面進行效益估算。在成本方面，估算項目包括：安裝、維護與更新成本。在個人效益方面，估算項目包括：節能、延長牆面壽命；社會效益方面，估算項目包括：空汙淨化、減碳與固碳。計算淨現值（NPV）、效益成本比（BCR）和還本期（PBP）三個指標，來評估立面綠化系統的經濟性。 研究結果顯示，目前大部分的立面綠化系統效益尚不足以回收成本，僅有直接綠化系統可產生正值，還本期為8年。以本研究結果來說，立面綠化的個人效益較大，而社會效益相對較小；此外目前立面綠化效益的實證研究尚集中在節能減碳，對於提升環境美學等效益面向尚未有廣泛而深入的研究結果可供採計，是故，在立面綠化系統高安裝與維護成下本，立面綠化在經濟上的投資效益相當低。未來為使立面綠化得以永續發展、廣泛建置，建議應針對立面綠化的其他效益進行研究加以評估其經濟效益，以擴增立面綠化的效益值，此外在政策與獎勵制度上提供減稅、補助等方式，有助於提升建置效益，針對高安裝與維護成本方面，建議未來開發新產品時，將降低建造與維護成本納入考量。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Related studies have confirmed that there are many benefits of vertical greening to the environment. However, whether the vertical greening system (VGS) is under sustainable development economically is yet to be further reviewed. In this study, we evaluated the worthiness of long-term investment in VGS through Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) to provide information for reference in future green vertical systems development and promotion.
This study conducted a literature review and analysis, provider interview, and CBA. First, based on the widely accepted VGS types, the existing vertical green products in Taiwan were divided into 5 systems according to their construction methods. Respect to the items evaluated in CBA, this study reviewed the studies that aimed to quantify the benefits of VGS and related CBA study for VGS. In terms of cost estimation, this calculated installation, maintenance and updating costs. The VGS benefits demonstrated by the studies were further divided into personal and social aspects. For personal aspect, the benefits terms calculated included building energy saving and wall life extension. For social aspect, the benefits terms calculated included air pollution purification, carbon reduction, and carbon sequestration. We evaluated the economy of the VGSs through three indicators: the net present value (NPV), the benefit-cost ratio (BCR), and the payback period (PBP). The study results showed that most of the 5 VGSs were not profitable. Only direct vertical greening system can produce positive profits, with a payback period of 8 years. For the 5 VGSs, the produced benefits for personal aspect were larger than that for the social aspect. Since most of the demonstrated benefits of VGS concentrated in energy saving and carbon reduction, the benefits of VGSs toward environmental aesthetics, real estate value, etc. were still rare and could not be adopted in this study. Compared to the high costs, the profits of VGS were quite low in this situation. In order to cover more comprehensive benefits of VGS and derive a more reasonable CBA value, the future studies are suggested to address other benefits of VGS. In addition, providing a tax deduction, incentive and reward might stimulate the construction willingness and increase the benefit value of VGS. Respect to the high cost of VGS, this study suggested considering how to cost down while developing a new product. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:42:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03628310-1.pdf: 3256943 bytes, checksum: 830ff75a4c2c6e2ae153596afb30c26c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究內容與流程 3 一、緒論 3 二、文獻回顧 3 三、研究方法 3 四、立面綠化省能效益模擬 4 五、立面綠化系統成本效益分析 4 六、結論與建議 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 立面綠化定義與分類 6 一、立面綠化的定義 6 二、立面綠化分類 6 第二節 立面綠化效益 9 一、節能效益 9 二、截水效益 11 三、空汙淨化效益 12 四、減碳與固碳效益 12 五、減噪效益 13 六、保護建築物 14 七、增加房地產價值 14 八、提升生物多樣性 14 九、美學效益 15 第三節 成本效益分析 16 一、成本效益分析法 16 二、立面綠化成本效益分析相關研究 25 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 研究範疇 27 一、成本採計與估算 27 二、效益採計與估算 28 第二節 立面綠化系統分類方法 29 第三節 立面綠化效益蒐集分析方法 29 一、文獻蒐集與判斷方法 29 二、效益類型與轉換方法 30 第四節 立面綠化成本蒐集分析方法 33 一、研究地點選擇方式 33 二、研究地點簡介 34 三、立面綠化建置成本問卷調查 36 第五節 立面綠化成本效益分析方法 38 第四章 立面綠化省能效益模擬 39 第一節 立面綠化系統分類結果 39 一、直接綠化系統 39 二、間接綠化系統 40 三、單體式綠化系統 41 四、植生毯綠化系統 42 五、區塊格框式綠化系統 42 第二節 模擬參數設定 45 一、Energyplus參數選項 45 二、Energyplus模型驗證 45 三、立面綠化系統模擬參數 51 四、建立建築物模型模擬 53 五、模型參數設定 53 第三節 五大類系統溫度表現 55 一、內牆表面溫度 55 二、室內溫度 56 第四節 五大類系統省能表現 57 一、全年空調用電度數 57 二、暖氣用電度數 59 三、冷氣用電度數 59 四、全年節能電費 61 第五章 立面綠化系統成本效益分析 62 第一節 立面綠化系統建置廠商基本資料 62 一、廠商基本資料 62 二、系統資料 64 第二節 立面綠化成本 65 一、立面綠化成本訪談結果 65 二、補助措施 69 三、個人成本總計 71 第三節 個人效益 72 一、延長牆面壽命 72 二、節能效益 74 三、個人效益總計 75 第四節 社會效益量化結果 76 一、減碳效益 76 二、固碳效益 78 三、空汙淨化效益 80 四、社會效益總計 81 第五節 立面綠化成本效益分析結果 82 一、淨現值 82 二、效益成本比 89 三、還本期 89 第六章 結論與建議 91 第一節 結論與討論 91 一、個人成本 91 二、個人效益 92 三、社會效益 94 四、成本效益分析 95 第二節 建議 98 參考文獻 99 附件一、立面綠化效益文獻整理表 106 附件二、立面綠化建置與維護管理成本調查問卷 113 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | EnergyPlus | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 植生牆 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 節能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 淨現值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 效益成本比 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 還本期 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Benefit-Cost Ratio | en |
| dc.subject | Payback period | en |
| dc.subject | Living walls | en |
| dc.subject | EnergyPlus | en |
| dc.subject | Energy Saving | en |
| dc.subject | Net present value | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣立面綠化系統之成本效益分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The cost-benefit analysis for vertical greening systems in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin),張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang),鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng),沈立(Li Shen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 植生牆,EnergyPlus,節能,淨現值,效益成本比,還本期, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Living walls,EnergyPlus,Energy Saving,Net present value,Benefit-Cost Ratio,Payback period, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 117 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602563 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。