請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49674
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 童國倫(Kuo-Lun Tung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jia-Ying Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳佳穎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:41:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] P. Vandezande, L. E. Gevers, and I. F. Vankelecom, “Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level,” Chemical Society Reviews, 37. 365-405, 2008.
[2] X. Q. Cheng, Y. L. Zhang, Z. X. Wang, Z. H. Guo, Y. P. Bai, and L. Shao, “Recent Advances in Polymeric Solvent‐Resistant Nanofiltration Membranes,” Advances in Polymer Technology, 33, 2014. [3] Y. Liu, J. Wang, H. Zhang, C. Ma, J. Liu, S. Cao, and X. Zhang, “Enhancement of proton conductivity of chitosan membrane enabled by sulfonated graphene oxide under both hydrated and anhydrous conditions,” Journal of Power Sources, 269. 898-911, 2014. [4] R. Ding, H. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Wang, B. Shi, H. Mao, J. Dang, and J. Liu, “Graphene oxide-embedded nanocomposite membrane for solvent resistant nanofiltration with enhanced rejection ability,” Chemical Engineering Science, 138. 227-238, 2015. [5] K. Vanherck, A. Aerts, J. Martens, and I. Vankelecom, “Hollow filler based mixed matrix membranes,” Chem. Commun., 46. 2492-2494, 2010. [6] G. Szekely, M. F. Jimenez-Solomon, P. Marchetti, J. F. Kim, and A. G. Livingston, “Sustainability assessment of organic solvent nanofiltration: from fabrication to application,” Green Chemistry, 16. 4440-4473, 2014. [7] P. Marchetti, M. F. Jimenez Solomon, G. Szekely, and A. G. Livingston, “Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: a critical review,” Chem Rev, 114. 10735-806, Nov 12, 2014. [8] J. Mulder, Basic principles of membrane technology: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. [9] W. Koros, Y. Ma, and T. Shimidzu, “Terminology for membranes and membrane processes (IUPAC Recommendations 1996),” Pure and Applied Chemistry, 68. 1479-1489, 1996. [10] R. W. Baker, Membrane technology: Wiley Online Library, 2000. [11] A. I. Schäfer, A. G. Fane, and T. D. Waite, Nanofiltration: principles and applications: Elsevier, 2005. [12] S. Sourirajan, Separation of hydrocarbon liquids by flow under pressure through porous membranes, DTIC Document, 1964. [13] J. G. Bitter, J. P. Haan, and H. C. Rijkens, 'Process for the separation of solvents from hydrocarbons dissolved in the solvents,' Google Patents, 1988. [14] H. F. Shuey, and W. Wan, 'Asymmetric polyimide reverse osmosis membrane, method for preparation of same and use thereof for organic liquid separations,' Google Patents, 1985. [15] J. F. Miller, D. R. Bryant, K. L. Hoy, N. E. Kinkade, and R. H. Zanapalidou, 'Membrane separation process,' Google Patents, 1997. [16] L. Peeva, M. Sairam, A. Livingston, D. Enrico, and G. Lidietta, “Nanofiltration operations in nonaqueous systems,” Comprehensive Membrane Science and Engineering, 1, 2010. [17] L. S. White, I.-F. Wang, and B. S. Minhas, 'Polyimide membrane for separation of solvents from lube oil,' Google Patents, 1993. [18] C. Linder, M. Nemas, M. Perry, and R. Katraro, 'Silicon-derived solvent stable membranes,' Google Patents, 1993. [19] W. R. Bowen, and J. S. Welfoot, “Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration—critical assessment and model development,” Chemical Engineering Science, 57. 1121-1137, 2002. [20] L. S. White, “Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane,” Journal of Membrane Science, 205. 191-202, 2002. [21] D. Bhanushali, S. Kloos, and D. Bhattacharyya, “Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental results and the role of solute–solvent coupling,” Journal of Membrane Science, 208. 343-359, 2002. [22] D. Bhanushali, S. Kloos, C. Kurth, and D. Bhattacharyya, “Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling,” Journal of membrane science, 189. 1-21, 2001. [23] P. Vandezande, L. E. Gevers, J. S. Paul, I. F. Vankelecom, and P. A. Jacobs, “High throughput screening for rapid development of membranes and membrane processes,” Journal of membrane science, 250. 305-310, 2005. [24] L. E. Gevers, I. F. Vankelecom, and P. A. Jacobs, “Solvent-resistant nanofiltration with filled polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membranes,” Journal of membrane science, 278. 199-204, 2006. [25] D. Fritsch, P. Merten, K. Heinrich, M. Lazar, and M. Priske, “High performance organic solvent nanofiltration membranes: Development and thorough testing of thin film composite membranes made of polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs),” Journal of Membrane Science, 401. 222-231, 2012. [26] J. Kwiatkowski, and M. Cheryan, “Performance of nanofiltration membranes in ethanol,” Separation science and technology, 40. 2651-2662, 2005. [27] T. Tsuru, T. Sudoh, T. Yoshioka, and M. Asaeda, “Nanofiltration in non-aqueous solutions by porous silica–zirconia membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, 185. 253-261, 2001. [28] R. Rohani, M. Hyland, and D. Patterson, “A refined one-filtration method for aqueous based nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membrane molecular weight cut-off determination using polyethylene glycols,” Journal of Membrane Science, 382. 278-290, 2011. [29] N. Stafie, D. Stamatialis, and M. Wessling, “Effect of PDMS cross-linking degree on the permeation performance of PAN/PDMS composite nanofiltration membranes,” Separation and purification technology, 45. 220-231, 2005. [30] B. Van der Bruggen, J. Schaep, D. Wilms, and C. Vandecasteele, “Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration,” Journal of Membrane Science, 156. 29-41, 1999. [31] Y. S. Toh, X. Loh, K. Li, A. Bismarck, and A. Livingston, “In search of a standard method for the characterisation of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes,” Journal of membrane science, 291. 120-125, 2007. [32] S. Dutczak, M. Luiten-Olieman, H. Zwijnenberg, L. Bolhuis-Versteeg, L. Winnubst, M. Hempenius, N. Benes, M. Wessling, and D. Stamatialis, “Composite capillary membrane for solvent resistant nanofiltration,” Journal of Membrane Science, 372. 182-190, 2011. [33] M. Sairam, X. Loh, Y. Bhole, I. Sereewatthanawut, K. Li, A. Bismarck, J. Steinke, and A. Livingston, “Spiral-wound polyaniline membrane modules for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN),” Journal of Membrane Science, 349. 123-129, 2010. [34] A. G. Livingston, and Y. S. Bhole, 'Asymmetric membranes for use in nanofiltration,' Google Patents, 2013. [35] X. Li, S. De Feyter, D. Chen, S. Aldea, P. Vandezande, F. Du Prez, and I. F. Vankelecom, “Solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes based on multilayered polyelectrolyte complexes,” Chemistry of Materials, 20. 3876-3883, 2008. [36] J. E. Cadotte, and R. J. Petersen, 'Thin-film composite reverse-osmosis membranes, origin, development, and recent advances [Water purification].' [37] M. F. J. Solomon, Y. Bhole, and A. G. Livingston, “High flux membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)—Interfacial polymerization with solvent activation,” Journal of Membrane Science, 423. 371-382, 2012. [38] S. Verissimo, K.-V. Peinemann, and J. Bordado, “Thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes: an optimized manufacturing method,” Journal of membrane science, 264. 48-55, 2005. [39] M. F. J. Solomon, Y. Bhole, and A. G. Livingston, “High flux hydrophobic membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)—Interfacial polymerization, surface modification and solvent activation,” Journal of Membrane Science, 434. 193-203, 2013. [40] X. Li, P. Vandezande, and I. F. Vankelecom, “Polypyrrole modified solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, 320. 143-150, 2008. [41] A. V. Volkov, V. V. Parashchuk, D. F. Stamatialis, V. S. Khotimsky, V. V. Volkov, and M. Wessling, “High permeable PTMSP/PAN composite membranes for solvent nanofiltration,” Journal of Membrane Science, 333. 88-93, 2009. [42] L. E. Gevers, I. F. Vankelecom, and P. A. Jacobs, “Zeolite filled polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as an improved membrane for solvent-resistant nanofiltration (SRNF),” Chemical communications. 2500-2502, 2005. [43] S. Sorribas, P. Gorgojo, C. Téllez, J. Coronas, and A. G. Livingston, “High flux thin film nanocomposite membranes based on metal–organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135. 15201-15208, 2013. [44] M. Peyravi, M. Jahanshahi, A. Rahimpour, A. Javadi, and S. Hajavi, “Novel thin film nanocomposite membranes incorporated with functionalized TiO 2 nanoparticles for organic solvent nanofiltration,” Chemical Engineering Journal, 241. 155-166, 2014. [45] S. Roy, S. A. Ntim, S. Mitra, and K. K. Sirkar, “Facile fabrication of superior nanofiltration membranes from interfacially polymerized CNT-polymer composites,” Journal of Membrane Science, 375. 81-87, 2011. [46] M. Namvar-Mahboub, M. Pakizeh, and S. Davari, “Preparation and characterization of UZM-5/polyamide thin film nanocomposite membrane for dewaxing solvent recovery,” Journal of Membrane Science, 459. 22-32, 2014. [47] H. Zhang, H. Mao, J. Wang, R. Ding, Z. Du, J. Liu, and S. Cao, “Mineralization-inspired preparation of composite membranes with polyethyleneimine–nanoparticle hybrid active layer for solvent resistant nanofiltration,” Journal of Membrane Science, 470. 70-79, 2014. [48] H. Siddique, L. G. Peeva, K. Stoikos, G. Pasparakis, M. Vamvakaki, and A. G. Livingston, “Membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration based on preassembled nanoparticles,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52. 1109-1121, 2012. [49] Y. Li, G. He, S. Wang, S. Yu, F. Pan, H. Wu, and Z. Jiang, “Recent advances in the fabrication of advanced composite membranes,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 1. 10058-10077, 2013. [50] L. Shao, X. Cheng, Z. Wang, J. Ma, and Z. Guo, “Tuning the performance of polypyrrole-based solvent-resistant composite nanofiltration membranes by optimizing polymerization conditions and incorporating graphene oxide,” Journal of Membrane Science, 452. 82-89, 2014. [51] K. Huang, G. Liu, Y. Lou, Z. Dong, J. Shen, and W. Jin, “A graphene oxide membrane with highly selective molecular separation of aqueous organic solution,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 53. 6929-6932, 2014. [52] Y. Han, Z. Xu, and C. Gao, “Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification,” Advanced Functional Materials, 23. 3693-3700, 2013. [53] B. Mi, “Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving,” Science, 343. 740-742, 2014. [54] N. Wang, S. Ji, G. Zhang, J. Li, and L. Wang, “Self-assembly of graphene oxide and polyelectrolyte complex nanohybrid membranes for nanofiltration and pervaporation,” Chemical engineering journal, 213. 318-329, 2012. [55] G. Z. Ramon, M. C. Wong, and E. M. Hoek, “Transport through composite membrane, part 1: Is there an optimal support membrane?,” Journal of Membrane Science, 415. 298-305, 2012. [56] A. K. Ghosh, and E. M. Hoek, “Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide–polysulfone interfacial composite membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science, 336. 140-148, 2009. [57] J.-H. Kim, and K.-H. Lee, “Effect of PEG additive on membrane formation by phase inversion,” Journal of membrane science, 138. 153-163, 1998. [58] E. Saljoughi, M. Amirilargani, and T. Mohammadi, “Effect of poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) concentration and coagulation bath temperature on the morphology, permeability, and thermal stability of asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 111. 2537-2544, 2009. [59] N. Ochoa, P. Pradanos, L. Palacio, C. Pagliero, J. Marchese, and A. Hernandez, “Pore size distributions based on AFM imaging and retention of multidisperse polymer solutes: characterisation of polyethersulfone UF membranes with dopes containing different PVP,” Journal of Membrane Science, 187. 227-237, 2001. [60] S. H. Yoo, J. H. Kim, J. Y. Jho, J. Won, and Y. S. Kang, “Influence of the addition of PVP on the morphology of asymmetric polyimide phase inversion membranes: effect of PVP molecular weight,” Journal of membrane science, 236. 203-207, 2004. [61] S. Kaur, S. Sundarrajan, D. Rana, T. Matsuura, and S. Ramakrishna, “Influence of electrospun fiber size on the separation efficiency of thin film nanofiltration composite membrane,” Journal of membrane science, 392. 101-111, 2012. [62] K. Yoon, B. S. Hsiao, and B. Chu, “High flux nanofiltration membranes based on interfacially polymerized polyamide barrier layer on polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous scaffolds,” Journal of Membrane Science, 326. 484-492, 2009. [63] B. Vatsha, J. C. Ngila, and R. M. Moutloali, “Preparation of antifouling polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP 40K) modified polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for water purification,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 67. 125-131, 2014. [64] M. Peyravi, A. Rahimpour, and M. Jahanshahi, “Thin film composite membranes with modified polysulfone supports for organic solvent nanofiltration,” Journal of membrane science, 423. 225-237, 2012. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49674 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 有機溶劑奈米過濾(Organic Solvent nanofiltation, OSN)利用薄膜技術,可以去除分子量200-1000 Da的有機物,只讓分子小的溶劑通過薄膜。相較於傳統分離程序如蒸餾、吸收、層析來的更節能、操作上更安全。複合膜(Thin film composite membrane, TFC)常用來製備有機溶劑奈米過濾薄膜,由於其含有超薄的選擇層,選擇層下方為多孔支撐層,提供薄膜機械強度。相較於傳統的非對稱膜(integrally skinned asymmetric, ISA),TFC膜的選擇層來的更薄,因此通量上來得更高。
本研究利用相轉換法及靜電紡絲法在不織布上製備耐溶劑的聚酰亞胺(PI)多孔層,之後利用介面聚合技術,製備緻密聚酰胺(Polyamide)選擇層,形成TFC薄膜,分析其表面微觀結構、表面官能基、接觸角等薄膜性質,應用到OSN上,結果發現其薄膜在具有穩定的溶劑通量與良好的溶質阻擋率,其分子截流量約為520 g/mol,在六小時長時間的操作下也不會被乙醇膨潤(swell),是相當良好的有機溶劑奈米過濾材料。 此外研究不同基材(靜電紡絲與PVP添加劑)對多孔基材內部構造與表面的影響,以及其形成的TFC膜對OSN通量與阻擋率的影響。另外,添加二維片狀氧化石墨烯(graphene oxide, GO)到緻密聚酰胺層,形成奈米複合薄膜(Thin film nanocomposite membrane, TFN),結果發現其氧化石墨烯層狀排列結構能在選擇層中形成特殊的通道障礙,阻擋溶質通過並提升溶質之阻擋率。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) is a novel technique, which can separate molecular (between 200 and 1000 Da) in solvents. Compared to conventional technique, such as distillation, extraction, chromatography, OSN is much more energy efficient, environmentally friendly and safe. Because of their specific characteristics (very thin top layers), the thin film composite (TFC) membrane have good value for OSN application. TFC membrane consists of a very thin, selective layer on top of a porous ultrafiltration (UF) support.
In this study, the thin film composite membranes were prepared via interfacial polymerization on PI supports. The supports were prepared via phase inversion and electrospinning. From SEM image, the support via phase inversion showed finger-like structure and pore around 10 nm. After interfacial polymerization, dense defect free polyamide layer can be observed on top of support. The membranes were characterized by SEM, FTIR and contact angle. The OSN performances were evaluated using ethanol as solvent and four dyes as solutes. The flux of ethanol is 0.3 L/m2h bar. The MWCO of TFC membranes was around 520 g/mol, proving its OSN ability. Besides, the operation stability of TFC membranes were evaluated. Despite a slight drop of flux, the membrane exhibited potential long-term stability for OSN application. The support via electrospinning and support with PVP were also compared with original support by their morphology comparison and flux and rejection ability after interfacial polymerization. Besides, the GO sheets were incorporated into thin film of TFC membranes in this study. The GO sheets acted as good filler in polymer matrix and acted as molecular barriers and thereby suppressed the transport of solutes. The solute rejection was increased by GO incorporation | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:41:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03524036-1.pdf: 4899135 bytes, checksum: b0afa5efa9f43126fbf99e36d4ae2f59 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES x Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 General overview 1 1.2 Aims of this study 4 Chapter 2 Literature review 6 2.1 The need and development of OSN technology 6 2.2 Material aspects of OSM membranes 11 2.2.1 Membrane functional characterization 11 2.2.2 Membrane types and polymeric materials 14 2.2.3 Mix matrix membrane (MMM) 19 2.2.4 GO incorporation 22 2.2.5 Supports of TFC membrane 23 Chapter 3 Experimental 29 3.1 Materials and chemicals 29 3.2 Equipment 29 3.3 Preparation of PI support 30 3.4 Preparation of TFC membranes 31 3.5 Characterization of membranes 32 3.6 Stability test 33 3.7 Membrane performance 34 Chapter 4 Results and discussion 36 4.1 Fabrication of TFC membranes 36 4.1.1 Effects of pore former PVP 36 4.1.2 Effects of support layer fabrication methods 38 4.1.3 Effects of GO incorporation 40 4.2 Characterization of membranes 42 4.2.1 SEM 42 4.2.2 FTIR 43 4.2.3 Contact angle 44 4.3 Stability test 45 4.4 Membrane performance 45 4.4.1 Effects of pore former PVP 45 4.4.2 Effects of GO incorporation 47 4.4.3 Solvent flux and dye rejection studies of TFC membrane 49 4.5 OSN operation stability 52 Chapter 5 Conclusions 54 REFERENCE 57 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 65 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 以聚酰亞胺為基材之界面聚合複合膜製備及其於有機溶劑奈米過濾之應用 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Interfacial polymerized ODPA-TFMB polyimide-based thin film composite membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林俊德(Chun-Te Lin) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃國楨(Kuo-Jen Hwang),莊清榮(Ching-Jung Chuang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 有機溶劑奈米過濾,界面聚合法,氧化石墨烯,相轉換法,複合膜, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Organic solvent nanofiltration,thin film composite membrane,graphene oxide incorporation,polyimide, | en |
dc.relation.page | 66 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602287 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 化學工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 化學工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.78 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。