請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49588
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 谷玲玲(Lin-Lin Ku) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Yu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳信佑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:36:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王叢桂(2000)。〈促進參與父職因素的探討〉,《應用心理研究》,6: 131-171。
2. 王郁琇(2006)。《單親父親之親職實踐》。世新大學性別研究所碩士論文。 3. 內政部統計處(2015年1月10日)。〈104年第2週內政統計通報(103年人口遷徙及社會增加概況)〉(一月十日新聞稿)【公告】。台北市:內政部統計處。取自:http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=9137 4. 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2013)。《50歲以上民眾數位機會調查報告》。台北:研究發展考核委員會。 5. 行政院主計處(2007)。《95年社會發展趨勢調查報告:家庭生活》。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=17856&ctNode=4948 6. 行政院主計處(2012)。《99年人口及住宅普查總報告統計結果提要分析》。台北:主計處。 7. 行政院主計處(2013)。〈101年國內遷徙調查統計結果綜合分析〉。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/342917374571.pdf 8. 行政院國家發展委員會(2015a)。《104年個人�家戶數位機會調查報告》。台北:國家發展委員會。 9. 行政院國家發展委員會(2015b)。《104年持有手機民眾數位機會調查報告》。台北:國家發展委員會。 10. 吳筱玫(2003)。《網路傳播概論》。台北:智勝文化。 11. 吳嘉瑜、蔡素妙(2006)。〈父親派外對家庭的影響─從成年前期學生的回溯經驗中探討〉,《中華輔導學報》,19: 137-173。 12. 呂玉瑕、伊慶春(2005)。〈社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工:台灣70年代與90年代社會文化脈絡的比較〉,《台灣社會學》,10: 41-94。 13. 沙儷伶(2006)。《轉變的家-兩岸分偶家庭之初探》。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文。 14. 李芸珮(2013)。《媽在看我臉書?初探Facebook上的親子互動》。政治大學傳播學院在職專班碩士論文。 15. 沈秀華(2009)。《情境單身-全球經濟下彈性親密關係的文化邏輯》。(國科會補助專題研究計畫期末成果報告,NSC 98-2410-H-007-056-MY2)。新竹市:清華大學社會學系。 16. 杜宜展、吳青蓉(2009)。〈父職角色信念與母職守門關係之研究〉,《育達學院學報》,18: 165-192。 17. 林群穎(2013)。《跨國分偶家庭之親子關係:以台商台幹家庭為例》。清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 18. 徐麗賢(2004)。《大陸台商父職實踐程度與實踐需求之研究》。嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。 19. 財團法人海峽交流基金會(2013)。〈102年大陸台商子女學校教職員聯誼活動〉林董事長致詞內容。 http://www.sef.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=613447&ctNode=4327&mp=1(檢索日期:2015年1月6日) 20. 翁康容、陳雅琪(2013)。〈移工家庭與工作之生存策略分析:在臺菲律賓女性移工的故事〉,《社會科學學報》,20: 29-60。 21. 張晉芬、李奕慧(2007)。〈「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,19(2): 203-229。 22. 許芷浩(2013)。《智慧型手機、智慧型戀愛?-探討智慧型手機應用程式在親密關係溝通中扮演之角色》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。 23. 許峯源(2015)。《跨國做家庭-傳播科技的性別政治》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 24. 教育部國際及兩岸教育(2015年5月25日)。103年度世界各主要國家之我留學生人數統計表。上網日期:2015年6月8日,取自http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20150525103732/103%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E5%90%84%E4%B8%BB%E8%A6%81%E5%9C%8B%E5%AE%B6%E4%B9%8B%E6%88%91%E7%95%99%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E4%BA%BA%E6%95%B8%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E8%A1%A8.pdf 25. 陳怡蒨(2004)。《行動電話溝通的人際接觸:探討不同性別的使用行為對人際接觸的影響》。政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 26. 陳富美、利翠珊(2004)。〈夫妻的育兒經驗:親職分工與共親職的探討〉,《中華心理衛生學刊》,17(4): 1-28。 27. 陳昭希(2014年6月)。〈貼圖中的情境線索:對行動通訊軟體用戶之態度與黏著度的影響〉,「2014年中華傳播學會年會研討會」,台北。 28. 陳信佑(2014年10月)。〈手機使用與家庭關係維繫:以台灣分居式家庭為例〉,「第五屆STS研究生論文研討會」,台北。 29. 郭馨棻(2011年7月)。〈當手機成為傳遞親密的工具:親密與手機溝通研究〉,「2011年中華傳播學會年會研討會」,新竹。 30. 郭馨棻(2013)。《結合行動與社交─從智慧型手機看年輕世代社交溝通的轉變》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 31. 郭美娟、陳若琳(2012)。〈雙薪家庭幼兒父親的親職效能,母親的教養鼓勵與父職參與之相關研究〉,《家庭教育與諮商學刊》,13: 57-79。 32. 黃思齊(2011)。《永恆聯繫,輕連結,強控制:手機愛情故事》。台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 33. 黃厚銘、曹家榮(2015)。〈「流動的」手機:液態現代性的時空架構與群己關係〉,《新聞學研究》,124: 39-81。 34. 彭大俊(2014)。《非語言溝通在行動通訊軟體之應用-以LINE貼圖為例》。台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 35. 彭采薇(2014)。《一張貼圖勝過千言萬語?初探即時通訊應用程式 LINE 之貼圖的親密效果》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。 36. 葉玫君(2004)。〈年輕族群行動文字簡訊使用研究初探〉,《資訊社會研究》,6: 235-282。 37. 楊美雪、蔡雯婷(2014)。〈智慧型手機通訊軟體使用者之社會臨場感與愉悅感研究─以LINE即時通訊軟體為例〉,《國立虎尾科技大學學報》,32(1): 35-50。 38. 蔡綿綿(2010)。《遠距母職:旅台菲籍勞工使用網路溝通履行母職的分析》。政治大學國際傳播英語碩士學位學程論文。 39. 蔡旻軒(2015)。《資通訊科技應用服務對親子關係之影響─以南部某大學為例》。成功大學電信管理研究所碩士論文。 40. 蕭英玲(2005)。〈臺灣的家務分工:經濟依賴及性別的影響〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,34: 115-145。 41. 藍佩嘉(2007)。〈性別與跨國遷移〉,黃淑玲、游美惠(編),《性別向度與台灣社會》,頁225-248。台北:巨流。 42. 簡立欣(2014年11月15日)。〈頂尖陸校磁吸 近萬台生出走〉,《旺報》。 43. Benítez, J. L. (2012). Salvadoran transnational families: ICT and communication practices in the network society. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1439-1449. 44. Block, J. H. (1983). Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures. Child Development, 54, 1335-1354. 45. Braun, M., Lewin‐Epstein, N., Stier, H., & Baumgärtner, M. K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(5), 1145-1156. 46. Cabanes, J. V. A., & Acedera, K. A. F. (2012). Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: Calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media & Society, 14(6), 916-930. 47. Cardoso, G., Gomes, M. d. C., Espanha, R., & Araújo, V. (2007), Mobile Portugal. Lisbon, Portugal: Obercom. 48. Chayko, M. (2008). Portable communities: The social dynamics of online and mobile connectedness. New York, NY: SUNY Press. 49. Choi, A. W. K. (2012). The relationship between family cohesion and intimacy in dating relationship: A study based on attachment and exchange theories. Discovery-SS Student E-Journal, 1, 91-109. 50. Christensen, T. H. (2009). 'Connected presence' in distributed family life. New Media & Society, 11(3), 433-451. 51. Church, K., & de Oliveira, R. (2013, August). What's up with WhatsApp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. Paper presented at the 15th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, Munich, Germany. 52. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zúñiga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253. 53. Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Fellows, K., & Day, R. D. (2014). “Media time= Family time” Positive media use in families with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29(5), 663-688. 54. Crosswhite, J. M., Rice, D., & Asay, S. M. (2014). Texting among United States young adults: An exploratory study on texting and its use within families. The Social Science Journal, 51(1), 70-78. 55. Cummings, J., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103-108. 56. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. 57. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355-366. 58. Delmonico, D. L., & Griffin, E. J. (2008). Cybersex and the E-teen: What marriage and family therapists should know. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(4), 431-444. 59. Devitt, K., & Roker, D. (2009). The role of mobile phones in family communication. Children & Society, 23(3), 189-202. 60. Fahey, T., Keilthy, P., & Polek, E. (2012). Family relationships and family well-being: A study of the families of nine year-olds in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin and the Family Support Agency. 61. Fischer, C. S. (1988). Gender and the residential telephone, 1890-1940: Technologies of sociability. Sociological Forum, 3(2), 211-233. 62. Fokkema, T., Bekke, S. T., & Dykstra, P. A. (2008). Solidarity between parents and their adult children in Europe. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. 63. Forste, R., & Fox, K. (2012). Household labor, gender roles, and family satisfaction: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 613-631. 64. Francisco, V. (2013). 'The Internet is Magic': Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 0(0), 1-18. 65. Friemel, T. N. (2014). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 1-19. doi: 10.1177/1461444814538648 66. Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552. 67. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Ryu, D. (1995). Cognitive elements in the social construction of communication technology. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(3), 259-288. 68. Ganito, C. (2010). Women on the move: the mobile phone as a gender technology. Comunicação & Cultura, 9, 77-88. 69. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400. 70. Gentzler, A. L., Oberhauser, A. M., Westerman, D., & Nadorff, D. K. (2011). College students' use of electronic communication with parents: Links to loneliness, attachment, and relationship quality. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1-2), 71-74. 71. Gorospe, A. E. (2007). Case-study: Overseas Filipino workers. Evangelical Review of Theology, 31(4), 369-375. 72. Haddon, L. (2004). Information and communication technologies in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Berg. 73. Hawkins, A. J., Christiansen, S. L., Sargent, K. P., & Hill, E. J. (1993). Rethinking fathers' involvement in child care: A developmental perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 14(4), 531-549. 74. Herring, S. C. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal, 18(1). Retrieved from http://cpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring/ 75. Hjorth, L. (2009). Mobile media in the Asia-Pacific: Gender and the art of being mobile. New York, NY: Routledge. 76. Horst, H. A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, 6(2), 143-159. 77. Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 10(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/hu.html 78. Huyer, S., & Sikoska, T. (2003). Overcoming the gender digital divide: Understanding ICTs and their potential for the empowerment of women. Instraw Research Paper Series, 1. Retrieved April 25, 2015, from http://nirapad.org.bd/admin/soft_archive/1308633754_Overcoming%20the%20Gender%20Digital%20Divide.pdf 79. Igarashi, T., Takai, J., & Yoshida, T. (2005). Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 691-713. 80. Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon II, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35-51. 81. Joinson, A. N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of Internet behavior: Virtual worlds, real lives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 82. Kahana, B., & Kahana, E. (1982). Clinical issues of middle age and later life. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 464(1), 140-161. 83. Kamal, F. M., Noor, N. L. M., & Baharin, H. (2014, June). “Presence in Absence”: Distributed family communication practices for familial bonding via mobile communication technology. Paper presented at the 16th international conference on human-computer interaction, Crete, Greece. 84. Kang, T. (2012). Gendered media, changing intimacy: Internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 34(2), 146-161. 85. Kanter, M., Afifi, T., & Robbins, S. (2012). The impact of parents “friending” their young adult child on Facebook on perceptions of parental privacy invasions and parent–child relationship quality. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 900-917. 86. Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 87. Keijsers, L., & Poulin, F. (2013). Developmental changes in parent–child communication throughout adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 49(12), 2301-2308. 88. Kilkey, M., Plomien, A., & Perrons, D. (2014). Migrant men's fathering narratives, practices and projects in national and transnational spaces: Recent polish male migrants to London. International Migration, 52(1), 178-191. 89. Kim, J., & Haridakis, P. M. (2009). The role of Internet user characteristics and motives in explaining three dimensions of Internet addiction. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(4), 988-1015. 90. Kweon, S. H., Hwang, K. H., & Jo, D. H. (2011). Time and space perception on media platforms. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, 12, 25-48. 91. Lee, A. S. (1994). Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 143-157. 92. Lemish, D., & Cohen, A. (2005). On the gendered nature of mobile phone culture in Israel. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 52(7-8), 511-521. 93. Licoppe, C. (2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology (pp. 171-186). New Brunswick, CA: Transaction Publishers. 94. Ling, R. (2008). The mediation of ritual interaction via the mobile telephone. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies (pp. 165‐176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 95. Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile communication. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. 96. Ling, R., & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper‐coordination via mobiles phones in Norway. In J. E. Katz & M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139‐169). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 97. Livholts, M., & Bryant, L. (2013). Gender and the telephone: Voice and emotions shaping and gendering space. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 9(2), 157-170. 98. Madianou, M. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: The role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 12(3), 277-295. 99. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. New York, NY: Routledge. 100. Malik, S., & Kadir, S. Z. (2011, December). The use of mobile phone and Internet in transnational mothering among migrant domestic workers in Singapore. Paper presented at the Communication Policy Research South, Bangkok, Thailand. 101. Matsuda, M. (2005). Discourses of Keitai in Japan. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 19-40). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 102. Maximo, S. I., Tayaban, H. S., Cacdac, G. B., Cacanindin, M. J. A., Pugat, R. J. S., Rivera, M. F., & Lingbawan, M. C. (2011). Parents’ communication styles and their influence on the adolescents’ attachment, intimacy and achievement motivation. International Journal of Behavioral Science, 6(1), 59-72. 103. Mazzucato, V., & Schans, D. (2011). Transnational families and the well‐being of children: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4), 704-712. 104. McBride, B. A., Brown, G. L., Bost, K. K., Shin, N., Vaughn, B. & Korth, B. (2005). Paternal identity, maternal gatekeeping, and father involvement. Family Relations, 54(3), 360-372. 105. McNaughton, J. (2000). Gender differences in parent-child communication patterns. Journal of Undergraduate Research, 3, 25-32. 106. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 107. Mickus, M. A., & Luz, C. C. (2002). Televisits: Sustaining long distance family relationships among institutionalized elders through technology. Aging & Mental Health, 6(4), 387-396. 108. Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107-112. 109. O'Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 403-431. 110. Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies, 27(2), 361-390. 111. Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 112. Parreñas, R. S. (2008). Transnational fathering: Gendered conflicts, distant disciplining, and emotional gaps. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(7), 1057-1072. 113. Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2010). The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children & Society, 24(1), 63-74. 114. Polce-Lynch, M., Myers, B. J., Kilmartin, C. T., Forssmann-Falck, R., & Kliewer, W. (1998). Gender and age patterns in emotional expression, body image, and self-esteem: A qualitative analysis. Sex Roles, 38(11-12), 1025-1048. 115. Rakow, L., & Navarro, V. (1993). Remote mothering and the parallel shift: Women meet the cellular telephone. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 20(3), 144-157. 116. Raup, J. L., & Myers, J. E. (1989). The empty nest syndrome: Myth or reality? Journal of Counseling & Development, 68(2), 180-183. 117. Rice, R.E., & Hagen, I. (2010). Young adults’ perpetual contact, social connection, and social control through the Internet and mobile phones. In C.T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 34 (pp. 2-39). London, UK: Routledge. 118. Roy, K. M., & Dyson, O. L. (2005). Gatekeeping in context: Babymama drama and the involvement of incarcerated fathers. Fathering, 3(3), 289-310. 119. Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18(4), 487-523. 120. Schon, J. (2014). “Dad doesn’t text” examining how parents’ use of information communication technologies influences satisfaction among emerging adult children. Emerging Adulthood, 2(4), 304-312. 121. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 122. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyckx, K., & Goossens, L. (2006). Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: An integrated model with adolescent self-disclosure and perceived parental knowledge as intervening variables. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 305-318 123. Sproull, L. S., & Kiesler, S. B. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512. 124. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. 125. Tan Teck Loon, V. (2006). The use of ICTs in long distance family communication: A Singaporean perspective. Unpublished master’s dissertation, National University of Singapore. 126. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company. 127. Thomas, M., & Lim, S. S. (2010). Migrant workers' use of ICTs for interpersonal communication - The experience of female domestic workers in Singapore. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://media-anthropology.net/thomas_lim_migrant_workers_ICT.pdf 128. Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. London, UK: Sage Publications. 129. Timmers, M., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. (1998). Gender differences in motives for regulating emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 974-985. 130. TNS. (2015). The new social frontier: Instant messaging usage jumps 12% globally as more people opt for closed platforms. Retrieved from TNS web site: http://www.tnsglobal.com/asia-pacific/press-release/rise-of-im 131. Vancea, M., & Olivera, N. (2013). E-migrant women in Catalonia: Mobile phone use and maintenance of family relationships. Gender, Technology and Development, 17(2), 179-203. 132. Vandeleur, C. L., Jeanpretre, N., Perrez, M., & Schoebi, D. (2009). Cohesion, satisfaction with family bonds, and emotional well-being in families with adolescents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1205-1219. 133. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90. 134. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43. 135. Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443-479). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 136. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 137. Wilding, R. (2006). ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6(2), 125-142. 138. Williams, A. L., & Merten, M. J. (2011). iFamily: Internet and social media technology in the family context. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(2), 150-170. 139. Yang, K. (2008). A preliminary study on the use of mobile phones amongst migrant workers in Beijing. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 21(2), 65-72. 140. Youniss, J., & Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescent relations with mothers, fathers, and friends. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 141. Zabriskie, R., & McCormick, B. (2001). The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 50(3), 66-74. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49588 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 親子分隔異地是常見的遠距家庭型態,隨著行動媒體及無線網路普及,行動即時通訊漸成為維繫親子關係的重要管道。
本研究採取深度訪談法訪問22戶遠距家庭,探討當行動即時通訊滲入遠距家庭後,親子溝通與親子關係出現何種轉變。研究發現,父母的性別差異扮演關鍵性的因素:一方面,親職的性別分工深刻影響親子溝通行為;另一方面,行動即時通訊的媒介特質與社會情境因素,也對溝通行為及親密關係產生影響。整體來說,本研究認為行動即時通訊對遠距親子關係而言是利多於弊,與過去文獻不同的是,本研究發現在傳統家庭中,行動即時通訊有助於父親與子女進行親子溝通;比起母親,父親與子女間更能感受到親密關係的改善。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Long-distance families, where parents and children live apart, are very common. With the growing popularity of smart phones and wireless networks, mobile instant messaging (MIM) has gradually become an important platform for maintaining parent-child relationships.
Conducting in-depth interviews with 22 long-distance families, this thesis explores how parents communicate with their children after the introduction of MIM into long-distance families. The research results that gender differences between father and mother plays a crucial role in parent-child communication. One the one hand, gendered division of parenting deeply affects the parent-child communication behavior. On the other hand, the characteristics of MIM and social factors also affect the communication behavior and intimacy between parents and children. Generally speaking, this paper concludes that MIM does more good than harm to long-distance parent-child relationships. In contrast to the past literature, this thesis finds that MIM help fathers to communicate with their children better in traditional families. Furthermore, the enhancement of relationships between fathers and children is better than that between mothers and children. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:36:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02342024-1.pdf: 6331927 bytes, checksum: 43c9ea43145a7ce84dad5f5d50bebb8d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
中文摘要 III 英文摘要 IV 目錄 V 圖.表目錄 VII 第一章、緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究背景 2 第三節 研究重要性與目的 6 第二章、文獻回顧 9 第一節 親職分工與親子溝通 9 第二節 行動即時通訊 13 第三節 遠距親子溝通與行動科技 29 第四節 本章小結與研究問題 37 第三章、研究方法 39 第一節 前導個案研究 39 第二節 研究方法說明 41 第三節 受訪家庭基本資料 44 第四章、資料分析 47 第一節 遠距親子關係與親子溝通 47 第二節 遠距親子使用行動科技的型態 55 第三節 行動即時通訊中的遠距親子溝通樣貌 64 第四節 轉變中的遠距親子關係 96 第五章、研究結論與建議 106 第一節 研究發現 107 第二節 研究限制與建議 113 參考文獻 115 附錄 127 附錄一:訪談問卷 127 附錄二:子女版訪談大綱 131 附錄三:父母版訪談大綱 133 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 行動即時通訊與親子關係維繫:以臺灣遠距家庭為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Mobile Instant Messaging and the Maintenance of Parent-Child Relationships: A Case Study of Taiwan’s Long-Distance Families | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 方念萱(Nien-Hsuan Fang),賴盈如(Ying-Ju Lai) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 行動即時通訊,遠距家庭,親子溝通,親子關係,親職分工,性別差異, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | mobile instant messaging,long-distance family,parent-child communication,parent-child relationship,division of parenting,gender difference, | en |
dc.relation.page | 134 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601904 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。