請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49585完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江俊毅 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Yu Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 何佳瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:36:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ampatzoglou, A., & Stamelos, I. 2010. Software Engineering Research for Computer Games: A Systematic Review. Information and Software Technology, 52(9): 888-901.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance. Organization Science, 3(3): 321-341. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411. Aoyama, Y., & Izushi, H. 2003. Hardware Gimmick or Cultural Innovation? Technological, Cultural, and Social Foundations of the Japanese Video Game Industry. Research Policy, 32(3): 423-444. Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & Walle, D. V. 2003. Reflections on the Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 29(6): 773-799. Baba, Y., & Tschang, F. T. 2001. Product Development in Japanese TV Game Software: The Case of an Innovative Game. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(04): 487-515. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. 1991. The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2): 213-238. Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. 1989. Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement. MIS Quarterly, 13(1): 53-63. Beck, K. 2000. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change: Addison-Wesley Professional. Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., & Jeffries, R. 2001. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Bethke, E. 2003. Game Development and Production: Wordware Pub. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. 1998. Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1): 7-74. Boehm, B. W. 1988. A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. Computer, 21(5): 61-72. Chin, W. W. 1998. The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2): 295-336. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. 2003. A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results From a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and An Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 14(2): 189-217. Chow, T., & Cao, D.-B. 2008. A Survey Study of Critical Success Factors in Agile Software Projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 81(6): 961-971. Clariana, R. B. 1999. Differential Memory Effects for Immediate and Delayed Feedback: A Delta Rule Explanation of Feedback Timing Effects, Association of Educational Communications and Technology Annual Convention. Houston, TX. Cockburn, A. 2004. Crystal Clear: A Human-Powered Methodology for Small Teams: Pearson Education. Cockburn, A., & Williams, L. 2003. Agile Software Development: It's About Feedback and Change. Computer, 36(6): 0039-0043. Cohendet, P., & Simon, L. 2007. Playing Across the Playground: Paradoxes of Knowledge Creation in the Videogame Firm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(5): 587-605. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. 2001. Locus of Feedback Control in Computer-Based Tutoring: Impact on Learning Rate, Achievement and Attitudes. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Crosby, O. 2000. Working So Others Can Play: Jobs in Video Game Development. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 44(2): 2-13. DCMS. 1998. Creative Industries Mapping Document 1998: Department of Culture, Media and Sports of the United Kingdom. Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., & Toth, J. A. 2004. Using Heuristics to Evaluate the Playability of Games. Paper presented at the CHI'04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Eladhari, M. P., & Ollila, E. M. I. 2012. Design for Research Results: Experimental Prototyping and Play Testing. Simulation & Gaming, 43(3): 391-412. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research: 39-50. Garthwaite, P. H. 1994. An Interpretation of Partial Least Squares. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425): 122-127. Goodman, J. S., & Wood, R. E. 2004. Feedback Specificity, Learning Opportunities, and Learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5): 809. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. 2013. Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education, Limited. Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. 2006. When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work. Organization Science, 17(4): 484-500. Harris, M. L., Collins, R. W., & Hevner, A. R. 2009. Control of Flexible Software Development Under Uncertainty. Information Systems Research, 20(3): 400-419. He, J., & King, W. R. 2008. The Role of User Participation in Information Systems Development: Implications from a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(1): 301. Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. 1979. Consequences of Individual Feedback on Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4): 349. Jalote, P., & Agrawal, N. 2005. Using Defect Analysis Feedback for Improving Quality and Productivity in Iterative Software Development. Paper presented at the Information and Communications Technology, 2005. Enabling Technologies for the New Knowledge Society: ITI 3rd International Conference. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. 2003. A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2): 199-218. Keith, C. 2010. Agile Game Development with Scrum: Pearson Education. Kerr, A. 2002. Representing Users in the Design of Digital Games. Paper presented at the Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference Proceedings. Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling: Guilford Press. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. 1996. The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: a Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2): 254. Koutonen, J., & Leppanen, M. 2013. How Are Agile Methods and Practices Deployed in Video Game Development? A Survey into Finnish Game Studios: Springer. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. 1988. Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1): 79-97. Maruping, L. M., Venkatesh, V., & Agarwal, R. 2009. A Control Theory Perspective on Agile Methodology Use and Changing User Requirements. Information Systems Research, 20(3): 377-399. Meso, P., & Jain, R. 2006. Agile Software Development: Adaptive Systems Principles and Best Practices. Information Systems Management, 23(3): 19-30. Mulder, R. H., Ellinger, A. D., Govaerts, M. J., van de Wiel, M. W., & van der Vleuten, C. P. 2013. Quality of Feedback Following Performance Assessments: Does Assessor Expertise Matter? European Journal of Training and Development, 37(1): 105-125. Musil, J., Schweda, A., Winkler, D., & Biffl, S. 2010. A Survey on the State of the Practice in Video Game Software Development: Technical report, QSE-IFS-10/04, TU Wien. Nandhakumar, J., Panourgias, N. S., & Scarbrough, H. 2013. From Knowing It to “Getting It”: Envisioning Practices in Computer Games Development. Information Systems Research, 24(4): 933-955. Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Mangalaraj, G. 2005. Challenges of Migrating to Agile Methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 48(5): 72-78. Northcraft, G. B., Schmidt, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. 2011. Feedback and the Rationing of Time and Effort Among Competing Tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5): 1076. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. 1994. Psychometric Theory: McGraw-Hill. Petrillo, F., & Pimenta, M. 2010. Is Agility Out There?: Agile Practices in Game Development. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. Petrillo, F., Pimenta, M., Trindade, F., & Dietrich, C. 2009. What Went Wrong? A Survey of Problems in Game Development. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 7(1): 1-22. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879. Poppendieck, M., & Poppendieck, T. 2003. Lean Software Development: An Agile Toolkit: Addison-Wesley Professional. Ramaprasad, A. 1983. On the Definition of Feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1): 4-13. Readman, J., & Grantham, A. 2006. Shopping for Buyers of Product Development Expertise: How Video Games Developers Stay Ahead. European Management Journal, 24(4): 256-269. Royce, W. W. 1987. Managing the Development of Large Software Systems: Concepts and Techniques, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering: 328-338. Monterey, California, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press. Sanchez, J. L. G., Vela, F. L. G., Simarro, F. M., & Padilla-Zea, N. 2012. Playability: Analysing User Experience in Video Games. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(10): 1033-1054. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. 2004. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals: MIT press. Schwaber, K. 1997. Scrum Development Process, Business Object Design and Implementation: 117-134: Springer. Schwaber, K. 2004. Agile Project Management with Scrum: Microsoft Press. Sethi, R. 2000. New Product Quality and Product Development Teams. Journal of Marketing, 64(2): 1-14. Shankar, V., & Bayus, B. L. 2003. Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4): 375-384. Shute, V. J. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1): 153-189. Stacey, P., & Nandhakumar, J. 2008. Opening up to agile games development. Communications of the ACM, 51(12): 143-146. Stacey, P., & Nandhakumar, J. 2009. A Temporal Perspective of the Computer Game Development Process. Information Systems Journal, 19(5): 479-497. Straub, D. W. 1989. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS quarterly: 147-169. Tschang, F. T. 2005. Videogames as Interactive Experiential Products and Their Manner of Development. International Journal of Innovation Management, 09(01): 103-131. Tschang, F. T. 2007. Balancing the Tensions Between Rationalization and Creativity in the Video Games Industry. Organization Science, 18(6): 989-1005. Tschang, F. T., & Szczypula, J. 2006. Idea Creation, Constructivism and Evolution as Key Characteristics in the Videogame Artifact Design Process. European Management Journal, 24(4): 270-287. Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Joreskog, K. G. 1974. Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1): 25-33. Zackariasson, P., Styhre, A., & Wilson, T. L. 2006a. Phronesis and Creativity: Knowledge Work in Video Game Development. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(4): 419-429. Zackariasson, P., Walfisz, M., & Wilson, T. L. 2006b. Management of Creativity in Video Game Development. Services Marketing Quarterly, 27(4): 73-97. Zhang, Q., & Doll, W. J. 2001. The Fuzzy Front End and Success of New Product Development: A Causal Model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(2): 95-112. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49585 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 遊戲開發專案採用敏捷開發方式，以保持足夠的彈性來面對遊戲設計和玩家喜好的不確定性。然而，敏捷開發方式強調使用者參與，遊戲團隊卻很難讓使用者參與開發過程。因此，開發團隊必須透過遊戲測試員的回饋來了解遊戲是否滿足玩家喜好。測試員需針對科技和美感給予回饋，這些面向將決定遊戲專案品質，包括穩定性、操作性和可玩性。本研究提出明確且及時的回饋，可以讓敏捷開發團隊所面對的不確定性降低，並且更能捕捉市場上不斷變化的玩家喜好，進而提昇遊戲專案品質。本研究採用實證方法驗證研究模式，透過成對樣本收集，由47組同一專案內的遊戲製作人與遊戲開發人員共同填寫問卷。結果顯示回饋及時性和回饋準確性皆對敏捷開發方式產生交互效果，其中，回饋及時性為正向效果，回饋準確性為負向效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Game development projects adopt agile methodology to leverage its flexibility when final design and consumer’s tastes are highly uncertain and unpredictable. Although close customer collaboration is an important success factor for agile methodology, agile development teams in game industry have difficulties in working closely with their end-users. As a result, team members tend to take advantage of game testers’ feedback to see whether the features meet the player’s tastes. Feedback from testers contains technical and aesthetic aspects that contribute to the quality of a game, that is, stability, functionality and playability. This study argues that specific and immediate feedback from testers can best facilitate the agile methodology use to achieve the game project quality. We conducted a field study with a paired-match questionnaire. 47 pairs of game producers and developers in different game development projects participated in the study. The results indicated that both feedback specificity and feedback timing strongly moderate the agile methodology use on the game project quality. More specifically, feedback specificity has negative moderating effect whereas feedback timing has positive moderating effect. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:36:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02741045-1.pdf: 697849 bytes, checksum: bacd1e6ee30a710281d654aa894fc2f9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgments -- i
Abstract -- ii Table of Contents -- iv List of Tables -- vi Table of Figures -- vii Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review -- 5 2.1 Methodologies Used in Game Development Process -- 5 2.2 Limited User Participation -- 8 2.2.1 Reasons for Limited User Participation -- 9 2.2.2 Actions Responding to Limited User Participation -- 11 2.3 Feedback in Game Development Projects -- 13 2.3.1 Feedback Specificity -- 14 2.3.2 Feedback Timing -- 16 Chapter 3 Research Model and Hypotheses -- 18 3.1 Agile Methodology Use and Game Project Quality -- 18 3.2 Feedback Specificity as Moderator -- 20 3.3 Feedback Timing as Moderator -- 21 Chapter 4 Research Methodology -- 23 4.1 Items Development -- 23 4.1.1 Agile Methodology Use -- 23 4.1.2 Feedback Specificity -- 24 4.1.3 Feedback Timing -- 25 4.1.4 Game Project Quality -- 25 4.1.5 Control Variables -- 26 4.1.6 Translation and Expert Review -- 26 4.2 Data Collection -- 27 Chapter 5 Results -- 30 5.1 Measurement Validation -- 30 5.1.1 Measurement Reliability -- 30 5.1.2 Measurement Validity -- 32 5.2 Hypotheses Testing -- 34 Chapter 6 Discussion and Conclusion -- 40 6.1 Discussion of the Results -- 40 6.2 Practical Implications -- 43 6.3 Theoretical Implications -- 45 6.4 Limitations and Recommendations for Future Research -- 46 6.5 Conclusion -- 47 Appendix A -- 48 References -- 50 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 探討敏捷開發方式與回饋特性對遊戲專案品質之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Role of Agile Methodology Use and Feedback Attributes in Game Development Projects: Implications for Game Project Quality | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉經緯,張伊婷,蔡家安 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 遊戲開發,敏捷開發方式,回饋明確性,回饋及時性,遊戲測試員, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | game development,agile methodology,feedback specificity,feedback timing,game tester, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 54 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602464 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 681.49 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。