請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49429
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭素芳(Suh-Fang Jeng) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsi-Wen Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃希文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:28:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.Aarnoudse-Moens, C. S., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Weisglas-Kuperus, N., Van Goudoever, J. B. & Oosterlaan, J. (2012). The profile of executive function in very preterm children at 4 to 12 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 54, 247-53.
2.Altemeier, L., Jones, J., Abbott, R. D. & Berninger, V. W. (2006). Executive functions in becoming writing readers and reading writers: note taking and report writing in third and fifth graders. Dev Neuropsychol 29, 161-73. 3.Anderson, P. J. & Doyle, L. W. (2004). Executive functioning in school-aged children who were born very preterm or with extremely low birth weight in the 1990s. Pediatrics 114, 50-7. 4.Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 13, 214-28. 5.Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders : the nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. Guilford Press: New York. 6.Beck, L. H., Bransome, E. D., Jr., Mirsky, A. F., Rosvold, H. E. & Sarason, I. (1956). A continuous performance test of brain damage. J Consult Psychol 20, 343-50. 7.Best, J. R., Miller, P. H. & Jones, L. L. (2009). Executive Functions after Age 5: Changes and Correlates. Dev Rev 29, 180-200. 8.Bohm, B., Smedler, A. C. & Forssberg, H. (2004). Impulse control, working memory and other executive functions in preterm children when starting school. Acta Paediatr 93, 1363-71. 9.Brydges, C. R., Fox, A. M., Reid, C. L. & Anderson, M. (2014). Predictive validity of the N2 and P3 ERP components to executive functioning in children: a latent-variable analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 8, 80. 10.Bull, R. & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: inhibition, switching, and working memory. Dev Neuropsychol 19, 273-93. 11.Buss, K. A., Dennis, T. A., Brooker, R. J. & Sippel, L. M. (2011). An ERP study of conflict monitoring in 4-8-year old children: associations with temperament. Dev Cogn Neurosci 1, 131-40. 12.Chen, L. C., Wu, Y. C., Hsieh, W. S., Hsu, C. H., Leng, C. H., Chen, W. J., Chiu, N. C., Lee, W. T., Yang, M. C., Fang, L. J., Hsu, H. C. & Jeng, S. F. (2013). The effect of in-hospital developmental care on neonatal morbidity, growth and development of preterm Taiwanese infants: a randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev 89, 301-6. 13.Ciesielski, K. T., Harris, R. J. & Cofer, L. F. (2004). Posterior brain ERP patterns related to the go/no-go task in children. Psychophysiology 41, 882-92. 14.Collins, A. & Koechlin, E. (2012). Reasoning, learning, and creativity: frontal lobe function and human decision-making. PLoS Biol 10, e1001293. 15.Conners, C. K. (2000). Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CPT-2) computer program for windows, technical guide, and software manual. Multi Health Systems Inc: Toronto, ON. 16.Conners, C. K., Epstein, J. N., Angold, A. & Klaric, J. (2003). Continuous performance test performance in a normative epidemiological sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol 31, 555-62. 17.Cornblatt, B. A., Risch, N. J., Faris, G., Friedman, D. & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1988). The Continuous Performance Test, identical pairs version (CPT-IP): I. New findings about sustained attention in normal families. Psychiatry Res 26, 223-38. 18.Cragg, L., Fox, A., Nation, K., Reid, C. & Anderson, M. (2009). Neural correlates of successful and partial inhibitions in children: an ERP study. Dev Psychobiol 51, 533-43. 19.de Kieviet, J. F., van Elburg, R. M., Lafeber, H. N. & Oosterlaan, J. (2012). Attention problems of very preterm children compared with age-matched term controls at school-age. J Pediatr 161, 824-9. 20.Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64, 135-68. 21.Dillon, D. G. & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2007). Inhibition of Action, Thought, and Emotion: A Selective Neurobiological Review. Appl Prev Psychol 12, 99-114. 22.Eriksen, B. & Eriksen, C. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 143-149. 23.Folstein, J. R. & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45, 152-70. 24.Ford, R. M., Neulinger, K., O'Callaghan, M., Mohay, H., Gray, P. & Shum, D. (2011). Executive function in 7-9-year-old children born extremely preterm or with extremely low birth weight: effects of biomedical history, age at assessment, and socioeconomic status. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 26, 632-44. 25.Garon, N., Bryson, S. E. & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative framework. Psychol Bull 134, 31-60. 26.Halperin, J. M., Wolf, L. E., Pascualvaca, D. M., Newcorn, J. H., Healey, J. M., O'Brien, J. D., Morganstein, A. & Young, J. G. (1988). Differential assessment of attention and impulsivity in children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27, 326-9. 27.Hammerer, D., Li, S. C., Muller, V. & Lindenberger, U. (2010). An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression. Neuropsychologia 48, 3305-16. 28.Harvey, J. M., O'Callaghan, M. J. & Mohay, H. (1999). Executive function of children with extremely low birthweight: a case control study. Dev Med Child Neurol 41, 292-7. 29.Howson, C. P., Kinney, M. V., McDougall, L. & Lawn, J. E. (2013). Born too soon: preterm birth matters. Reprod Health 10 Suppl 1, S1. 30.Hutchinson, E. A., De Luca, C. R., Doyle, L. W., Roberts, G. & Anderson, P. J. (2013). School-age outcomes of extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children. Pediatrics 131, e1053-61. 31.Iannaccone, R., Hauser, T. U., Staempfli, P., Walitza, S., Brandeis, D. & Brem, S. (2015). Conflict monitoring and error processing: new insights from simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Neuroimage 105, 395-407. 32.Johnstone, S. J., Barry, R. J., Anderson, J. W. & Coyle, S. F. (1996). Age-related changes in child and adolescent event-related potential component morphology, amplitude and latency to standard and target stimuli in an auditory oddball task. Int J Psychophysiol 24, 223-38. 33.Johnstone, S. J., Dimoska, A., Smith, J. L., Barry, R. J., Pleffer, C. B., Chiswick, D. & Clarke, A. R. (2007). The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices. Int J Psychophysiol 63, 25-38. 34.Johnstone, S. J., Pleffer, C. B., Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R. & Smith, J. L. (2005). Development of Inhibitory Processing During the Go/NoGo Task: A Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Study of Children and Adults. Journal of Psychophysiology 19, 11-23. 35.Jones, A. D., Cho, R. Y., Nystrom, L. E., Cohen, J. D. & Braver, T. S. (2002). A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2, 300-17. 36.Jonkman, L. M. (2006). The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study. Brain Res 1097, 181-93. 37.Lamm, C., Zelazo, P. D. & Lewis, M. D. (2006). Neural correlates of cognitive control in childhood and adolescence: disentangling the contributions of age and executive function. Neuropsychologia 44, 2139-48. 38.Lehto, J. E., Juujärvi, P., Kooistra, L. & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 21, 59-80. 39.Lin, C. C., Hsiao, C. K. & Chen, W. J. (1999). Development of sustained attention assessed using the continuous performance test among children 6-15 years of age. J Abnorm Child Psychol 27, 403-12. 40.Liu, T., Xiao, T., Shi, J., Zhao, D. & Liu, J. (2011). Conflict control of children with different intellectual levels: an ERP study. Neurosci Lett 490, 101-6. 41.Lodygensky, G. A., Vasung, L., Sizonenko, S. V. & Huppi, P. S. (2010). Neuroimaging of cortical development and brain connectivity in human newborns and animal models. J Anat 217, 418-28. 42.Lohaugen, G. C., Gramstad, A., Evensen, K. A., Martinussen, M., Lindqvist, S., Indredavik, M., Vik, T., Brubakk, A. M. & Skranes, J. (2010). Cognitive profile in young adults born preterm at very low birthweight. Dev Med Child Neurol 52, 1133-8. 43.Lorsbach, T. C., Wilson, S. & Reimer, J. F. (1996). Memory for Relevant and Irrelevant Information: Evidence for Deficient Inhibitory Processes in Language/ Learning Disabled Children. Contemp Educ Psychol 21, 447-66. 44.Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass. 45.MacLeod, C. M. (2007). The concept of inhibition in cognition. In Inhibition in cognition (ed. D. S. G. C. M. MacLeod), pp. 3-23. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, US. 46.Marlow, N., Hennessy, E. M., Bracewell, M. A. & Wolke, D. (2007). Motor and executive function at 6 years of age after extremely preterm birth. Pediatrics 120, 793-804. 47.Mikkola, K., Kushnerenko, E., Partanen, E., Serenius-Sirve, S., Leipala, J., Huotilainen, M. & Fellman, V. (2007). Auditory event-related potentials and cognitive function of preterm children at five years of age. Clin Neurophysiol 118, 1494-502. 48.Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A. & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex 'Frontal Lobe' tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41, 49-100. 49.Msall, M. E. (2012). Academic achievement after extreme prematurity: optimizing outcomes for vulnerable children in times of uncertainty. Acta Paediatr 101, 1196-7. 50.Olsen, P., Vainionpaa, L., Paakko, E., Korkman, M., Pyhtinen, J. & Jarvelin, M. R. (1998). Psychological findings in preterm children related to neurologic status and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatrics 102, 329-36. 51.Ortinau, C. & Neil, J. (2015). The neuroanatomy of prematurity: normal brain development and the impact of preterm birth. Clin Anat 28, 168-83. 52.Osterman, M. J., Kochanek, K. D., MacDorman, M. F., Strobino, D. M. & Guyer, B. (2015). Annual summary of vital statistics: 2012-2013. Pediatrics 135, 1115-25. 53.Ostgard, H. F., Solsnes, A. E., Bjuland, K. J., Rimol, L. M., Martinussen, M., Brubakk, A. M., Haberg, A. K., Skranes, J. & Lohaugen, G. C. (2016). Executive function relates to surface area of frontal and temporal cortex in very-low-birth-weight late teenagers. Early Hum Dev 95, 47-53. 54.Overtoom, C. C., Verbaten, M. N., Kemner, C., Kenemans, J. L., van Engeland, H., Buitelaar, J. K., Camfferman, G. & Koelega, H. S. (1998). Associations between event-related potentials and measures of attention and inhibition in the Continuous Performance Task in children with ADHD and normal controls. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 37, 977-85. 55.Protopapas, A., Archonti, A. & Skaloumbakas, C. (2007). Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference. Cogn Psychol 54, 251-82. 56.Ritter, B. C., Nelle, M., Perrig, W., Steinlin, M. & Everts, R. (2013). Executive functions of children born very preterm--deficit or delay? Eur J Pediatr 172, 473-83. 57.Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F. & Jankowski, J. J. (2002). Processing speed in the 1st year of life: a longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Dev Psychol 38, 895-902. 58.Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., Rothbart, M. K. & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2004). Development of the time course for processing conflict: an event-related potentials study with 4 year olds and adults. BMC Neurosci 5, 39. 59.Short, E. J., Klein, N. K., Lewis, B. A., Fulton, S., Eisengart, S., Kercsmar, C., Baley, J. & Singer, L. T. (2003). Cognitive and academic consequences of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and very low birth weight: 8-year-old outcomes. Pediatrics 112, e359. 60.Smith, E. E. & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science 283, 1657-61. 61.Soreni, N., Crosbie, J., Ickowicz, A. & Schachar, R. (2009). Stop signal and Conners' continuous performance tasks: test--retest reliability of two inhibition measures in ADHD children. J Atten Disord 13, 137-43. 62.St Clair-Thompson, H. L. & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 59, 745-59. 63.Taylor, H. G., Klein, N., Drotar, D., Schluchter, M. & Hack, M. (2006). Consequences and risks of <1000-g birth weight for neuropsychological skills, achievement, and adaptive functioning. J Dev Behav Pediatr 27, 459-69. 64.van der Meere, J., Stemerdink, N. & Gunning, B. (1995). Effects of presentation rate of stimuli on response inhibition in ADHD children with and without tics. Percept Mot Skills 81, 259-62. 65.van Meel, C. S., Heslenfeld, D. J., Rommelse, N. N., Oosterlaan, J. & Sergeant, J. A. (2012). Developmental trajectories of neural mechanisms supporting conflict and error processing in middle childhood. Dev Neuropsychol 37, 358-78. 66.van Veen, V. & Carter, C. S. (2002a). The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiol Behav 77, 477-82. 67.Van Veen, V. & Carter, C. S. (2002b). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 14, 593-602. 68.Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Version (WISC-IV): Manual. The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio,TX. 69.Wechsler, D. (2007). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition administration manual (Taiwan version). Chinese Behavioral Science Corporation: Taipei city, Taiwan,ROC. 70.Wostmann, N. M., Aichert, D. S., Costa, A., Rubia, K., Moller, H. J. & Ettinger, U. (2013). Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control. Brain Cogn 81, 82-94. 71.Wu, Y. Y., Huang, Y. S., Chen, Y. Y., Chen, C. K., Chang, T. C. & Chao, C. C. (2007). Psychometric study of the test of variables of attention: preliminary findings on Taiwanese children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 61, 211-8. 72.Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M. & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 111, 931-59. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49429 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 前言與目的:抑制功能是執行功能中的核心功能之一。雖然過去文獻顯示正常發展兒童的抑制功能與其日後適應能力及學業表現有關,但有關學齡期極低出生體重早產兒童(出生體重低於1500克)之抑制功能以及與認知功能和學校表現關聯的研究則相當有限。因此本研究將使用相關電位事件分析比較極低出生體重早產兒童與足月兒童在學齡期的抑制功能,並探討抑制功能與認知功能以及學校表現的相關性。方法:本實驗共徵召19位極低出生體重早產兒童與34位足月兒童,測量其7歲時之抑制功能、認知功能與學校表現。本研究使用腦波/事件相關電位分析進行旁側抑制作業與按鍵反應作業,以及使用連續操作試驗測量其抑制功能;使用魏氏兒童智力量表第四版評估其認知功能,學校表現則使用在校學期成績。結果:學齡期極低出生體重早產兒在旁側抑制作業(783.4±143.8毫秒相較688.1±73.8毫秒, p=0.01)與按鍵反應作業的反應時間均顯著較足月兒為長(575.4±81.6毫秒相較524.4±65.8 毫秒, p=0.02);早產兒在旁側抑制作業中的腦部N2最大振幅的差異較足月兒明顯為大(Cz:-2.02±3.99微伏特相較0.16±3.47微伏特, p=0.04; Pz:-2.37±5.61微伏特相較1.61±5.91微伏特, p=0.02)。同時早產兒的全量表智商(97.1±10.5相較108.2±14.5, p<0.01)及學業表現則明顯較足月兒為差(優等比例47%相較97% , p<0.01)。抑制功能參數中只有按鍵反應作業的反應時間與學業表現呈現顯著負相關(β[95%CI]= -0.03[-0.05至-0.01], p=0.02)。結論:學齡期極低出生體重早產兒童比足月兒童呈現較差的抑制功能、認知功能以及學業表現,而抑制功能中較長反應時間似乎是影響學業表現的因子之一。臨床應用:本研究的結果將提供重要訊息幫助了解極低出生體重學齡期早產兒童的抑制功能之神經電生理變化,以及未來提升在校學習及學業測驗的可能改善方向。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Purpose: Inhibitory control is the core ability of executive function that has been found to predict subsequent adaptive function and academic performance in school-aged children with normal development. Preterm children with very low birth weight (VLBW, birth weight <1,500 g) are at risk of cognitive impairment and poor academic performance at school age, however, the information concerning their inhibitory control and relation to cognition and academic performance has been limited. The aims of this study were therefore to examine the inhibitory control with electroencephalogram/event-related potential (EEG/ERP) and to assess its relation to cognition and academic performance in school-aged term children and VLBW preterm children. Methods: Nineteen seven-year-old VLBW preterm children and 35 age-matched term children were prospectively assessed for their inhibitory control using the flanker, go-nogo, and continuous performance tasks, cognitive function using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-4th edition, and school performance using the academic test performance among classmates. Results: VLBW preterm children exhibited significantly longer reaction time in the flanker (783.4±143.8 ms vs. 688.1±73.8 ms, p=0.01) and go-nogo tasks (575.4±81.6 ms vs. 524.4±65.8 ms, p=0.02), larger difference of N2 peak amplitude between congruent and incongruent trials in the flanker task (Cz: -2.02±3.99 μV vs. 0.16±3.47 μV, p=0.04; Pz: -2.37±5.61 μV vs. 1.61±5.91 μV, p=0.02), lower full-scale IQ score (97.1±10.5 vs. 108.0±14.5, p<0.01) and lower percent of excellent academic test performance than term children (47% vs. 97%, p<0.01). Furthermore, the reaction time of go-nogo task was the only factor significantly associated with the academic test performance in both preterm and term children (β[95%CI]= -0.03[-0.05 to -0.01], p=0.048). Conclusion: School-aged VLBW preterm children showed poorer inhibitory control ability, cognitive function and school performance than their term counterparts. The reaction time of inhibitory control partly contributed to the school performance in both preterm and term children. Implications: The results provide insightful information for understanding the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying inhibitory control and for planning academic learning and testing in school-aged VLBW preterm children. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:28:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R01428003-1.pdf: 1682428 bytes, checksum: bbcdd83c732ff50e82e9dd6ef38991dc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
口試委員審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii English Abstract iv Chapter I. Introduction 1 Chapter II. Method 5 2.1 Participants 5 2.2 Testing Procedure 6 2.3 Measurements 6 2.4. Statistical Analysis 10 Chapter III. Results 11 3.1 Participants 11 3.2. Executive Function Tests: Behavioral Data 11 3.3 Executive Function Tests: EEG/ERP Data 12 3.4 Cognitive assessment 12 3.5 School performance assessment 13 3.6 Associations between school performance, cognition and inhibitory control 13 Chapter IV. Discussion 14 Chapter V. Conclusion 20 Chapter VI. Acknowledgment 20 Chapter VII. References 21 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 學齡期足月與早產兒童的抑制功能與學業表現 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Inhibitory Control of Executive Function and School Performance in School-Aged Preterm and Term Children | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝武勳(Wu-Shiun Hsieh),謝淑蘭(Shu-Lan Hsieh),謝明憲(Ming-Hsien Hsieh),李佳霖(Chia-Lin Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 早產,抑制功能,學業表現,學齡期, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | prematurity,inhibitory control,school performance,school age, | en |
dc.relation.page | 38 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602979 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.64 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。