請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49321
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李佳霖(Chia-Lin Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Min-Hsin Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳旻昕 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:23:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aboitiz, F., López, J., & Montiel, J. (2003). Long distance communication in the human brain: timing constraints for inter-hemispheric synchrony and the origin of brain lateralization. Biological research, 36(1), 89-99.
Ahrens, K. (1994). Classifier production in normals and aphasics. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 22(2), 202-247. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun classification devices Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ansaldo, A. I., Arguin, M., & Lecours, A. R. (2002). The contribution of the right cerebral hemisphere to the recovery from aphasia: a single longitudinal case study. Brain and Language, 82, 206-222. Arambel, S. R., & Chiarello, C. (2006). Priming nouns and vrebs: Differential influences of semantic and grammatical cues in the two cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 97, 12-24. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.003 Banich, M. T., & Karol, D. L. (1992). The sum of the parts does not equal the whole: Evidence from bihemispheric processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance, 18, 763-784. Bourne, V. J. (2006). The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations. LATERALITY, 11(4), 373-393. Brennan, C., Cao, F., Pedroarena‐Leal, N., McNorgan, C., & Booth, J. R. (2013). Reading acquisition reorganizes the phonological awareness network only in alphabetic writing systems. Human Brain Mapping, 34(12), 3354-3368. Brown, J. W., & Hécaen, H. (1976). Lateralization and language representation: Observations on aphasia in children, lefthanders, and 'anomalous' dextrals. Neurology, 26, 183-189. doi:10.1212/WNL.26.2.183 Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Bihrle, A. M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference Deficits in Right Brain-Damaged Patients. Brain and Language, 27, 310-321. Chen, H. C., & Juola, J. F. (1982). Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English. Memory & Cognition, 10(3), 216-224. Chen, Y., Fu, S., Iversen, S. D., Smith, S., & Matthews, P. M. (2002). Testing for dual brain processing routes in reading: a direct contrast of Chinese character and pinyin reading using fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), 1088-1098. Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic inquiry, 30(4), 509-542. Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (2005). Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 259-292). Chiarello, C., & Maxfield, L. (1996). Varieties of Interhemispheric Inhibition, or How to Keep a Good Hemisphere Down. Brain and Cognition, 30, 81-108. Chou, C. J., Huang, H. W., Lee, C. L., & Lee, C. Y. (2014). Effects of semantic constraint and cloze probability on Chinese classifier-noun agreement. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 31, 42-54. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.06.003 CKIP. (n.d.). Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese. Retrieved from http://asbc.iis.sinica.edu.tw/ Clarke, J. M., Lufkin, R. B., & Zaidel, E. (1993). Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performance: individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition? Neuropsychologia, 31(6), 547-557. Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2007). A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Research, 1146, 128-145. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.008 Coulson, S., & Wu, Y. C. (2005). Right Hemisphere Activation of Joke-related Information: An Event-related Brain Potential Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 494-506. Davis, S. W., Kragel, J. E., Madden, D. J., & Cabeza, R. (2012). The Architecture of Cross-Hemispheric Communication in the Aging Brain: Linking Behavior to Functional and Structural Connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 22(1), 232-242. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr123 De Vreese, L. P., Neri, M., Rubichi, S., & Salviolo, G. (1996). Grammatical ambiguity resolution in right hemisphere-damaged patients: Evidence from an insertion task. Aphasiology, 10, 801-814. doi:10.1080/02687039608248451 Delis, C. D., Wapner, W., Gardner, H., & Moses, J. A. J. (1983). The Contrubution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of Paragraphs. Cortex, 19, 43-50. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149. Ettinger-Veenstra, H. V., Ragnehed, M., McAllister, A., & Lundberg, P. (2012). Right-hemisphere Cortical Contributions to Language Ability in Healthy Adults. Brain & Language, 120, 395-400. Federmeier, K. D., Mai, H., & Kutas, M. (2005). Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 871-886. Federmeier, K. D., Segal, J. B., Lombrozo, T., & Kutas, M. (2000). Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. Brain, 123(12), 2552-2566. Fu, S., Chen, Y., Smith, S., Iversen, S. D., & Matthews, P. M. (2002). Effects of word form on brain processing of written Chinese. NeuroImage, 17(3), 1538-1548. Gazzaniga, M. S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1971). Language and Speech Capacity of the Right Hemisphere. Neuropsychologia, 9, 273-280. Hamilton, R. H., Chrysikou, E. G., & Coslett, B. (2011). Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation. Brain and Language, 118(1), 40-50. Hécaen, H., De Agostini, M., & Monzon-Montes, A. (1981). Cerebral organization in left-handers. Brain & Language, 12, 261-284. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(81)90018-3 Humphries, C., Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., & Liebenthal, E. (2006). Syntactic and Semantic Modulation of Neural Activity during Auditory Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(4), 665-679. Hutner, N., & Liederman, J. (1991). Right hemisphere participation in reading. Brain and Language, 41(475-495). Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1996). Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension. Science, 274, 114-116. Karbe, H., Thiel, A., Weber-Luxenburger, G., Herholz, K., Kessler, J., & Heiss, W. D. (1998). Brain Plasticity in Poststroke Aphasia: What Is the Contribution of the Right Hemisphere? Brain and Language, 64, 215-230. Kee, D. W., & Bathurst, K. (1983). Lateralized interference of repetitive finger tapping: Influence of familial handedness, cognitive load and verbal production. Neuropsychologia, 21(6), 617-624. Kemmer, L., Coulson, S., & Marta, K. (2014). Grammatical number agreement processing using the visual half-field paradigm: Am event-related potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91, 88-103. Kuo, W. J., Yeh, T. C., Duann, J. R., Wu, Y. T., Ho, L. T., Hung, D., . . . Hsieh, J. C. (2001). A left-lateralized network for reading Chinese words: a 3 T fMRI study. Neuroreport, 12(18), 3997-4001. Lamb, M. R., Robertson, L. C., & Knight, R. T. (1990). Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 471-483. Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). It's All in the Family: Brain Asymmetry and Syntactic Processing of Word Class. Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0956797615575743 Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar: University of California Press. Lin, S. E., Chen, H. C., Zhao, J., Li, S., He, S., & Weng, X. C. (2011). Left-lateralized N170 response to unpronounceable pseudo but not false Chinese characters—the key role of orthography. Neuroscience, 190, 200-206. Liu, S. R. A., Chiarello, C., & Quan, N. (1999). Hemispheric Sensitivity to Grammatical Cues: Evidence for Bilateral Processing of Number Agreement in Noun Phrases. Brain and Language, 70, 483-503. Luck, S. J. (2014). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique: MIT press. Luo, H., Ni, J. T., Li, Z. H., Li, X. O., Zhang, D. R., Zeng, F. G., & Chen, L. (2006). Opposite patterns of hemisphere dominance for early auditory processing of lexical tones and consonants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(51), 19558-19563. Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia: Its syndromes, psychology and treatment. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. Moscovitch, M. (1976). On the representation of language in the right hemisphere of right-handed people. Brain and Language, 3, 47-71. Oldfield, R. C. (1970). The Assessment and Analysis of Handedness: THE Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113. Ringo, J. L., Doty, R. W., Demeter, S., & Simard, P. Y. (1994). Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cerebral Cortex, 4(4), 331-343. Schneiderman, E. I., & Murasugi, K. (2003). Does right hemisphere damaged patients' impaired performance on a sentence insertion task indicate a syntactic or a lexical level deficit? Brain and Language, 85, 377-384. doi:10.1016/S0093934X(03)00058-0 Schneiderman, E. I., & Saddy, J. D. (1988). A Linguistic Deficit Resulting from Right-Hemisphere Damage. Brain and Language, 34, 38-53. Service, E., Helenius, P., Maury, S., & Salmelin, R. (2007). Localization of Syntactic and Semantic Brain Responses using Magnetoencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(7), 1193-1205. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1193. Spencer, K. M., & Banich, M. T. (2005). Hemispheric biases and the control of visiospatial attention: an ERP study. BMC Neuroscience, 6(51). doi:10.1186/1471-2202-6-51 Subirana, A. (1958). The prognosis in aphasia in relation to cerebral dominance and handedness. Brain, 81, 415-425. doi:10.1093/brain/81.3.415 Townsend, D. J., Carrithers, C., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Familial Handedness and Access to Words, Meaning, and Syntax during Sentence Comprehension. Brain and Language, 78, 308-331. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2469 Tyler, L. K., Shafto, M. A., Randall, B., Wright, P., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2010). Preserving Syntactic Processing across the Adult Life Span: The Modulation of the Frontotemporal Language System in the Cortext of Age-Related Atrophy. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 352-364. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp105 Valaki, C. E., Maestu, F., Simons, P. G., Zhang, W., Fernandez, A., Amo, C. M., . . . Papanicolaou, A. C. (2004). Cortical organization for receptive language functions in Chinese, English, and Spanish: a cross-linguistic MEG study. Neuropsychologia, 42(7), 967-979. Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P. Y., Jobard, G., Petit, L., Crivello, F., . . . Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2010). What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing?: Insights from a meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 54(1), 577-593. Wang, W. S. Y. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228, 50-56-. Zaidel, E. (1983). On multiple representations of the lexicon in the brain-The case of two hemispheres Psychology of language (pp. 105-125). Zaidel, E. (1990). Language Functions in the Two Hemispheres Following Complete Cerebral Commissurotomy and Hemispherectomy. In R. D. Nebes & S. Corkin (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vol. 4, pp. 115-150). New York: Elsevier Science. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49321 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去研究普遍認為人類處理句法的能力側化到左腦,近期研究則指出,右腦某些程度上也擁有同樣的能力。但對於句法資訊在同樣的句法單位但語意程度不同的語言中,右腦處理句法訊息的方式尚未有定論。因此,本篇論文以中文為媒介探討 (1)中文詞類訊息處理的歷程是否和英文的腦側化現象一致 (2)不同處理方式反應兩腦間何種合作和抑制關係。
本篇研究使用事件相關電位(Event-Related Potential, ERP)技術,收集28位慣用右手且擁有右利家族史(FS-)的年輕人之腦波。研究包含四個實驗,實驗一至二為腦波實驗,試圖回答研究問題一;實驗三至四則是針對研究問題二設計的行為實驗。實驗一探討中文詞類訊息處理的語言歷程,通順或不通順的中文詞組會呈現在螢幕正中央供參與者閱讀。實驗結果成功複製文獻中句法合理性的效果(grammaticality effect),包括300-600毫秒的語意衝突效果(N400 effect)和600-1100毫秒的句法衝突效果(P600 effect)。實驗二使用分視野實驗方法(divided-visual field paradigm),記錄目標詞呈現在左視野或右視野時,左腦和右腦優勢處理句法的歷程,結果顯示中文詞類訊息的處理歷程和英文一樣側化到左腦。 過去研究在解釋語言腦側化背後的神經機制時,指出機制下兩腦間的溝通關係可能為單側抑制關係(左腦對右腦的抑制)或者雙邊合作關係。實驗三和四,分別為雙向旁側抑制作業(bilateral flanker task) 和語意配對測驗(word-matching task),測試參與者兩腦間的單側抑制和合作整合能力。在雙向旁側抑制作業中,螢幕上的左右視野會分別出現指向相同或不同的兩個箭頭。參與者必須注意被指示的其中一側,回答該側箭頭的指向,同時抑制對異側箭頭的反應。在語意配對測驗中,參與者在螢幕上閱讀呈現在單側或對側的兩個中文單字,並判斷兩者的語意匹配程度。結果發現語言腦側化的程度和兩腦間的合作關係(以語意配對測驗上的表現為指標)呈現顯著負相關,而和兩腦間的抑制關係(以雙向旁側抑制作業的表現為指標)較無相關,表示腦側化程度越高者,在雙邊合作的作業上越容易受到干擾。 綜觀腦電波和行為實驗的結果,本篇研究不但確立中文詞類訊息處理的腦側化現象,也顯示在語言腦側化程度較高的年輕人當中,兩腦合作關係和腦側化程度相關,並反映出大腦雙邊合作和訊息整合的緊密關係。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | While recent evidence suggests that the right hemisphere (RH) is not as insensitive to syntactic information as previously thought, the extent to which the RH can engage combinatorial syntactic processes like the left-hemisphere (LH) does across languages that are lexically coded to different degrees is still poorly understood. The present study targeted Chinese native speaker to investigate (1) whether similar qualitative difference between two hemispheres during syntactic processing of word class information previously found in English can also be found in Chinese and (2) what kind(s) of the underlying mechanisms or inter-hemispheric communication are implied for such functional asymmetry of language.
We conducted four experiments collecting data from 28 right-handed young adults without familial sinistrality background (FS-) to research on these topics, the first two being ERP experiments seeking answer for question (1) and the last two behavioral tasks attempting to answer question (2). Experiment 1 investigated word class violation with central presentation, in which participants read either match or mismatch word pairs presented at the center of the computer screen. The results successfully replicated previous findings by showing grammaticality effects indexed by N400 (300-600 ms) and P600 (600-1100 ms). Experiment 2 then investigated word class violation with divided-visual field presentation, in which the targets were presented either in left-visual field or right-visual field, assessing the LH- and RH-biased responses respectively. The results showed a left-lateralized P600 effect, similar to what was reported in the English literature. As suggested by past studies that interhemispehric communication of coordination between two hemispheres or unilateral inhibition (from LH on RH) to be the most possible mechanisms underlying the functional asymmetry of language, we designed experiment 3 and 4, bilateral flanker task and word-matching task, to assess the ability of interhemispheric inhibition and coordination for each participant. In the bilateral flanker task participants saw pairs of arrows presented across left and right visual fields. The arrows were either congruent or incongruent in direction. They were asked to attend to one of the visual fields and judge for the direction of the target arrow while ignoring the distractor from the other visual field. In the word-matching task, participants were shown two Chinese one-syllable words either bilaterally shown to each visual field or unilaterally within a same visual field. Participants were asked to make semantic relatedness judgment. The results revealed a negative correlation between the degree of language lateralization and the inerhemispheric coordination ability (assessed using the word-matching task), but not interhemispheric inhibition ability (assessed using the bilateral flanker task), suggesting that larger degree of language lateralization reflects greater interference between hemispheres during tasks requiring bilateral integration and thus results in worse interhemispheric coordination. Combining the results from both ERP experiments and behavioral tasks, the present findings established the functional lateralization patterns of brain responses during word class processing in Chinese. In addition, the present findings demonstrated that among young adults with stronger lateralization pattern in language processing, the degree of lateralization is related to interhemispheric coordination, pointing out the close relationship between parallel processing and bilateral integration. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:23:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02142003-1.pdf: 1608511 bytes, checksum: 7f2e243f6eb88b84594d1e943e0fbf43 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝詞 i
Abstract ii 中文摘要 iv List of Figures vii List of Tables ix Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 The role of right hemisphere in semantic processing 1 1.2 The role of right hemisphere in syntactic processing 3 1.3 Familial sinistrality and brain lateralization 8 1.4 Brain asymmetry as a consequence of better or worse inter-hemispheric interaction 9 1.5 The present study 10 1.5.1 Hemispheric differences in word-class processing in Chinese 11 1.5.2 Inter-hemispheric communication 14 Chapter 2. Event-Related Potential Studies 17 2.1 Experiment 1: Word class violation experiment with central presentation 17 2.1.1 Participants 17 2.1.2 Materials 18 2.1.3 Procedure 22 2.1.4 EEG recording parameters and data analysis 23 2.1.5 Results 25 2.1.6 Interim summary 28 2.2 Experiment 2(a): Word class violation experiment with divided-visual field presentation 28 2.2.1 Participants 29 2.2.2 Materials 29 2.2.3 Procedure 31 2.2.4 EEG recording parameters and data analysis 32 2.2.5 Results 32 2.2.6 Interim summary 39 2.3 Experiment 2(b): Split-visual field number task for measurement of horizontal eye movement 39 2.3.1 Materials 39 2.3.2 Procedure 40 2.3.3 Results 41 Chapter 3. Behavioral Experiments 43 3.1 Experiment 3: Bilateral Flanker Task 43 3.1.1 Materials 44 3.1.2 Procedure 45 3.1.3 Results 46 3.1.4 Interim summary 50 3.2 Experiment 4: Word-matching Task 52 3.2.1 Materials 52 3.2.2 Procedure 54 3.2.3 Results 55 3.2.4 Interim summary 60 Chapter 4. Discussion 61 4.1 Word class violation experiment with central presentation 62 4.2 Word class violation experiment with divided-visual field presentation 63 4.2.1 Similar functional brain asymmetry for word class processing in Chinese and English 63 4.2.2 Zaidel’s hierarchy of RH syntactic processing 65 4.2.3 RH sensitivity to word class information 70 4.3 Relationship between lateralization and interhemispheric inhibition 72 4.4 Correlation between lateralization and inter-hemispheric coordination 74 4.5 Concluding remarks 77 References 78 Appendix A. 87 Appendix B. 89 Appendix C. 91 Appendix D. 92 Appendix E. 93 Appendix F. 94 Appendix G. 95 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 中文詞類訊息處理的腦側化現象:事件相關電位研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Brain Asymmetry in Syntactic Processing of Word Class in Chinese: An ERP study | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蘇以文(I-Wen Su),謝舒凱(Shu-Kai Hsieh),李佳穎(Chia-Ying Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 句法處理,中文詞類訊息,分視野實驗,語言腦側化現象,兩腦間抑制關係,兩腦間合作關係, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | syntactic processing,word class information,split-visual field paradigm,hemispheric differences,language lateralization,interhemispheric inhibition,interhemispheric coordination, | en |
dc.relation.page | 96 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603053 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 語言學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.57 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。