請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49122完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張登及(Teng-Chi Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-An Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡舒安 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:16:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
一、專書與期刊論文 王祖寧、劉寅龍譯，2013，《最寒冷的冬天：韓戰真相解密》，台北：八旗文化。譯自David Halberstam, The Coldest Winter: America and the Korean War, California: Pan Books. 任平，《韓國親美外交沿革史研究》(吉林：延邊大學世界史研究所碩士學位論文，2003年)。 任平、吳振剛，2006，〈二戰後韓國採取親美外交的歷史原因分析〉，《佳木斯大學社會科學學報》，24(3)：78-80。 朱立熙，2013，《韓國史：悲劇的循環與宿命》，台北：三民出版社。 朱柏松，2004，《南北韓的關係與統一》，臺北：臺灣商務印書館。 宋學文，2004，〈從層次分析探討霸權穩定理論：一個國際關係理論演化的研究方法〉，《問題與研究》，43(2)：171-196。 李沅烈，《從韓國外交政策看韓美同盟的演變及未來》(北京：外交學院碩士生論文，2009年)，頁8。 李智恒，2009，《國內政治與冷戰後美韓同盟再定義》，上海：上海辭書出版社。 沈定昌，2008，《韓國外交與美國》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。 林添貴譯，2013，《朝鮮戰爭─你以為已經遺忘，其實不曾瞭解的一段歷史》，台北，左岸文化出版社。譯自Bruce Cumings, the Korean War : a History, New York: Modern Library. 河凡植，2012，〈ECFA與韓國的因應措施〉，《問題與研究》，51(2)：133-156。 河凡植，2012，〈中國對朝鮮半島地緣經濟戰略與其對中國與南北韓關係之影響〉，《中國大陸研究》，55(1)：41-70。 祁建華、王慶東，2009年，《東亞安全與駐韓美軍》，北京：世界知識出版社。 胡菀如譯，2013，《韓國：撼動世界的嗆泡菜》，台北：聯經出版社。譯自Daniel Tudor, Korea: The impossible country, Vermont: Tuttle Publishing. 董向榮，2003，〈戰後美國對韓援助的政策演變及其政治影響：1945-1961〉，《當代韓國》，4： 54-59。 劉會清，2007，〈韓國工業化對中國現代化的啟示—以美國外援的視角解讀韓國工業化進程〉，《內蒙古民族大學學報(社會科學版)》， 33(3)：13-17。 劉德海，2005，《南韓自由貿易協定策略之研究》，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫，(計畫編號：93-2414-H004-025)，未出版。 蔡東杰，2005，〈當前東亞霸權結構的變遷發展分析〉，《全球政治評論》，9：101-122。 鄭端耀，2004，〈國際關係新古典現實主義理論〉，《問題與研究》，44 (1): 115-140。 蘇長何、信強譯，2005，《霸權之後：世界政治經濟中的合作與紛爭》，上海：上海世紀出版集團。譯自Robert Kohen, After Hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 蘭新，2015，〈韓國電影中美國形象的呈現和嬗變(1945-1979)〉，《當代文壇》，3：101-104。 二、報紙新聞與網路資料 星島網，2006，中國北韓關係跌至低點，2016.10.10。〈http://std.stheadline.com/archive/fullstory.asp?andor=or&year1=2006&month1=1&day1=7&year2=2006&month2=12&day2=7&category=a&id=20061010a03&keyword1=&keyword2=〉 貳、韓文部分 一、專書與期刊論文 강병규，2000，〈반미감정과 주한미군 : 반미운동은 반한운동과 같다 - 월남의 교훈을 잊지 말아야 한다〉[反美情節和駐韓美軍：反美運動和反韓運動相似—不要忘記越南的教訓]，《한국논단》 132: 34-46。 글 오연호，2013，《노무현, 마지막 인터뷰》[盧武鉉，最後的訪問]，어마이뉴스，서울:천일문화사。 김동수，2014，〈한.미동맹 강화하되 중국과 다양한 소통체계 만들어야〉[強化韓美同盟前必須先和中國製造多元溝通管道]，《통일한국》，9: 24-25。 김우상，2004， 〈한.미 동맹의 이론적 재고〉[韓美同盟的理論回顧]， 《한국과 국제정지》， 20(1): 1-28。 김종영，2015，지배받는 지배자: 미국 유학과 한국 엘리트의 탄생 [被支配的支配者：美國留學和韓國菁英的誕生]，경기도 파주시: 돌베개。 손경호，2013，〈한미동맹의 역사 – 동맹이론을 통해 본 한미동맹의 역할을 중심으로—〉[韓美同盟的歷史—透過同盟理論看韓美同盟的角色為中心]，《통일연구》，17(2): 39-64。 이철순，2012，〈이승만의 대미외교를 통한 국가생존 전략(1895-1953)〉[以李承晚的對美外交看國家生存戰略(1895-1953)]，《한국정치연구》，21(3): 179-206。 장영민，2014，〈한국전쟁기’미국의 소리(Voice of America) 한국어방송’에 관한 연구〉[韓國戰爭期間「美國之音(Voice of America)韓語版廣播」的相關研究] ，《역사와 경계》，90: 257-308。 정기웅，2009，〈동맹이론을 중심으로 본 한.미동맹에 있어서의 전시작전통제권 환수의 의미〉[以同盟理論為中心看韓美同盟戰時作戰指揮權易手的意義]，《 사회과연구》，48(1): 1-29。 정일준，2007，〈한국 민주주의와 미국 -박정희 정권시기 한국 정치변동에 대한 미국의 공개 개입과 불개입을 통한 개입을 중심으로-〉[韓國民主主義和美國—朴正熙政權時期和韓國政治變動相關的美國的公開介入以及藉由不介入的介入為中心],《기억과 전망》，17: 202-238。 류상영，2011，〈박정희시대 한일 경제관계와 포항제철—단절의 계기에 대한 정치경제학적 재해석—〉[朴正熙時代韓日經濟關係以及浦項製鐵—和斷絕契機相關的政治經濟學再詮釋]，《日本研究論叢》，33: 255-285。 具永壽，1987，〈韓國民族主義運動에 關한 展開過程의 特性 研究 –衛正斥邪、開化運動、東學運動 및3.1運動을 中心으로–〉， 《東義法政》，3: 175-195。 二、報紙新聞與網路資料 대한민국 정부 국방부，2015，나라사랑으로 지켜낸 서해，〈http://www.korea.go.kr/pictrPolicySvc/413〉，2016/06/18。 조선닷컴，2015，제2연평해전 [第二延坪海戰]，〈http://focus.chosun.com/sajun/keyword/keyword.jsp?id=7740〉，2016/06/20 조선닷컴，2015，천안함 침몰 사건 [天安爆沈沒事件]，〈http://focus.chosun.com/sajun/keyword/keyword.jsp?id=15931〉，2016/06/20 參、英文部分 一、官方文件 Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State , Letter From the Ambassador to Korea (Brown) to the Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs (Bundy), 1964.09.03. Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State , Letter From the Ambassador to Korea (Brown) to the Assistant Secretary of State for Far Eastern Affairs (Bundy), 1964.09.21. Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State , Memorandum of Conversation1,1964.12.19.. Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea; October 1, 1953，2015/12/15。 二、專書及期刊論文 Armacost, Michael H. and Okimoto, Daniel L. 2004. The Future of America’s Alliances in Northeast Asia. Stanford: Asia Pacific Research Center. Beeson, Mark, “American Hegemony and Regionalism: The Rise of East Asia and the End of the Asian-Pacific,” Geopolitics 11(4): 541-560. Brands, Jr., Henry W. 1987. “The Dwight D. Eisenhower Administration Syngman Rhee, and the “Other” Geneva Conference of 1954,” Pacific Historical Review 56(1): 59-85. Cha, Victor D. 2009. “Powerplay: origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia.” International Security 34(3): 158-196. Cha, Victor D. 2011. “Rhee-Straint: The Origins of the U.S.-ROK Alliance. ” International Journal of Korean Studies 15(1): 1-15. Chae, Hae-sook. 2010. “South Korean Attitudes toward the ROK-U.S. Alliance: Group Analysis.” Political Science & Politics 43(3): 493-501. Cheng, Chai-Lin. 1983. America of the 1970’s Reconsidered: the American Economy in the 1970s – A Backward Look –. 미국학논집15: 163-175. Choi, Inbom and Schott, Jeffrey J. 2001. Free Trade between Korea and the United States?. Washington D.C.: Person Institution for International Economic. Christensen, Thomas J.. 2011.Worse Than a Monolith: Alliance Politics and Problems of Coercive Diplomacy in Asia. U.K.: Princeton University Press. Chung, Jae-Ho. 2007. Between Ally and Partner: Korea-China Relations and the United States. New York: Columbia University Press. Clark, Donald N. 1995. “Growth and Limitations of Minjung Christianity in South Korea”.in Kenneth M. Wells edit, South Korea’s Minjung Movement: the Culture and Politics of Dissidence. Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i press. Clark, Ian. 2009. “Bringing Hegemony back in: the United States and International Order,” International Affairs 85(1): 23-36. Cooper, Scott. 2010. “State-Centric Balance-of-Threat Theory,” Security Studies 13(2): 306-349. Cossa, Ralph A., Alan Oxley. 2000.CH4: The U.S.-Korea Alliance, in Robert D. Blackwill and Paul Dibbs edit, America’s Asian Alliances. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Cumings, Bruce. 2005. Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton. Doyle, Michael W., “Three Pillars of Liberal Peace,” American Political Science Review 99(3): 463-466. Eberstadt, Nicholas. 2010. Policy and Economic Performance in Divided Korea during the Cold War Era: 1945-91. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Frank Jr., Charles R., and Kim, Suk- Kwang, “Economic Growth in South Korea since World War II,” in Charles R. Frank Jr., and Kim, Suk- Kwang, ed., Foreign Trade Regimes and Economics Development: South Korea, (U.S.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1975). Hahm, Chaibong. 2008. ”South Korea’s Miraculous Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 19(3): 128-142. Han, Sung-joo. 1980. “South Korea and the United States: the Alliance Survives.” Asian Survey 20(11): 1075-1086. Han, Sung-joo. 2001. “South Korea and the United States: Past, Present and Future,” in Lee Jung-hoon, ed., Korean Politics and Foreign Affairs. Gyeonggi-do : The academy of Korean Studies Press. Harris, Richard L. and Seid, Melinda J.. 2000. Critical Perspectives on Globalization and Neoliberalism in the Developing Countries. Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden. Holsti, Ole R. 1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates.” International Studies Quarterly 36(4): 439-466. Hong, Yong-Pyo. 2000. State Security and Regime Security: President Syngman Rhee and the Insecurity Dilemma in South Korea 1953-60. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Howard, Peter. 2004. “Why not invade North Korea? Threats, Language Games, and U.S. Foreign Policy,” International Studies Quarterly 48: 805-828. Hundt, David, 2009. Korea’s Developmental Alliance: State, capital and the politics of rapid development. New York: Routledge. Hurrell, Andrew. 2006. ”Hegemony liberalism and global order,” International Affairs 82(1): 1-19. Ikenberry, G. John. 2009. “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order,” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 71-87. Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: the Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Izumikawa, Yasuhiro. 2009. “The Rise of China, US-China Relations, and the Future of East Asia: A Social Exchange Network Analysis,” in Taik-young Hamm and Kun Young Park, eds., Sino-US Relations and the Korea Peninsula. Seoul: the KAIS International Conference Series. Kalinowski, Thomas, Chu, Hyekyung, ”the Political Economy of Financial Liberalization in South Korea: State, Big Business and Foreign Investor,” ASIAN SURVEY, Vol. XLIX, No. 2, March/April 2009. Kim, Byung-Kook and Vogel, Ezra F.. 2011. the Park Chung Hee Era: the transformation of South Korea. US: Harvard University Press. Kim, Sung- Han. 2003. “Anti- American Sentiment and the ROK-US Alliance.” the Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 59(2): 105-130. Kim, Sung-han. 2010. “From blood alliance to strategic alliance: Korea’s evolving strategic thought toward the United States.” The Korea Journal of Defense Analysis. 22(3): 265-281. Kiyota, Kozo and Stern, Robert M.. 2007. Economic Effects of a Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. Washington D.C.: Korea Economic Institution. Kwak, Tae- Hwan, Wayne Patterson. 1999. “Chapter 6: the security relationship between Korea and the United States, 1960-1982.” Korean- American relations1866-1997, New York: State university of New York. Kyung, Hoon Leem. 2001. “Back to feature: The Politics of Economic Reform under the Kim Dae-Jung Presidency.” Journal of East Asian Studies 1(1): 53-90. Lee, Chae-Jin. 2006. A Trouble Peace: U.S. Policy and the Two Koreas, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Lee, Choon-Kun. 2009. North Korea’s Policy toward the United States and the Coordination between the United States and South Korea- A Korean Perspective, in Bae Jung-Ho and Abraham Denmark edit, The U.S.-ROK Alliance in the 21st Century. Seoul: The Korea Institute for National Unification. Lee, Jong-Sup and Uk Heo. 2001. “The U.S.-South Korea Alliance: Free riding and bargaining,” Asian Survey 41(5): 822-845. Lee, Jong-Sup and Uk Heo. 2002. The U.S.-South Korea Alliance1961-1988: Free riding and bargaining. N.Y. : Edwin Mellen Press. Lee, Sook-Jong. 2002. “Sources of Anti-Americanism in Korea Society: Implication for Korea-U.S. Relations,” in Baek Jong-Chun, Lee Sang-Hyun, eds., Korea-U.S. Relations in Transition: Korea-U.S. Alliance in Retrospect and Prospects for a New Strategic Partnership. Seongnam: Sejong Institute. Levin, Norman D. and Han, Yong-Sup, Sunshine in Korea: the South Korean Debate over Policies Toward North Korea, RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy, Pittsburgh, 2002,. Lion, To-Hai,. 2008. South Korea’s FTA Strategy under Roh Moo-hyun. Taiwanese Journal of WTO Studies 9: 177-212. Mo, Jongryn and Weingast, Barry R.. 2013. Korean Political and Economic Development: Crisis, Security and Institutional Rebalance. US: the President and Fellow of Harvard College. Mo, Jongryn, and Weingast, Barry R., 2013.Korea Political and Economic Development: Crisis, Security and Institutional Rebalancing, N.Y.: Harvard University Press. Moon, Katharine. 2004. “South Korea –U.S. Relation.” Asian Perspective 28(4): 39-61. Moran, Jonathan. 1998. “Corruption and NIC development: A case study of South Korea.” Crime, Law and Social Change 29: 161-177. Myers, Robert J.. 2001. Korea in the Cross Currents: A Century of Struggle and the Crisis of Reunification. New York: Palgrave. Nam, Chang-hee. 2006. “Relocating the U.S. Forces in South Korea: Strained Alliance, emerging Partnership in the Chang Defense Posture.” Asian Survey, 46(4): 615-631. Niksch, Larry A.. 2005. The Six-Party Statement: Is It a Viable Roadmap or a Road to Nowhere, in Larry A. Niksch et al., Implementing the Six- Party Joint Statement and the Korean Peninsula. Seoul: The Korea Institute for National Unification. Park, Glenn Baek. 2013. “Chung-hee’s Vietnam Odyssey: A Study in Management of the U.S.-ROK Alliance.” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 25(2): 147-170. Park, Jae-Jeo. 2011. “A Comparative Case Study of the U.S.-Philippines Alliance in the 1990s and the U.S.- South Korea Alliance Between 1998 and 2008.” Asian Survey 51(2): 268-289. Park, Sang Hoon. 1994. “North Korea and the challenge to the US-South Korean Alliance,” Survival: Global Politics and strategy 36(2): 80-95. Park, Tae Gyun. 2012. An Ally and Empire: Two Myths of South Korea-United States Relations, 1945-1980. Gyeonggi-do: The academy of Korean Studies press. Park, Tong Whan. 1991. “The Future of U.S.-South Korea Security Relations,” in Michael J. Mazarr, John Q. Blodgett, Cha Youmg-koo and William J. Taylor,Jr. eds., Korea 1991: The Road to Peace. Washington: Westview Press. Pedersen, Thomas. 2002. “cooperative hegemony: power, ideas and institutions in regional integration.” Review of International Studies 28(4): 667-696. Peet, Richard. 2002. “Ideology, Discourse, and the Geography of Hegemony: From Socialist to Neoliberal Development in Postapartheid South Africa,” Antipode 34(1): 54-84. Pirie, Iain. 2008. The Korea Developmental State: From dirigisme to neo-liberalism. New York: Routledge. Priess, David. 2007. “Balance-of-Threat theory and the genesis of the gulf cooperation council: An interpretative case study.” Security Studies,5(4): 143-171. Roehrig, Terence. 2005. From Deterrence to Engagement: The U.S. Defense Commitment to South Korea. Oxford: Lexington Books. Schott, Jeffery J., Bradford, Scott C. and Moll, Thomas. 2006. “Negotiating the Korea- United States Free Trade Agreement,” Policy Briefs: in International Economics, Number PB06-4, pp. 3. Shaw, Carole Cameron. 2007. The Foreign Destruction of Korean Independence. Seoul: Seoul National University. Sim, Chi- Kyu, A comparison of the Economic Development of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines since Independence, (Gangwon-Do: Korean Minjok Leadership Academy, Winter 2007.2008), pp. 16,〈http://www.zum.de/whkmla/sp/0708/chikyu/chikyu2.html〉 Snyder, Scott. 2009. Pursuing a Comprehensive Vision for the US-South Korea Alliance. Washington, DC.: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Suh, Jae- Jung. 2007. Power, Interest, and Identity in Military Alliances. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Suk, Chin-Ha and James L. Morrison. 1987. “South Korea’s Participation in the Vietnam War: A Historiographical Essay,” Korea Observer 18(3): 270-316. Walt, Stephen M. 1987. the Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. William, Brock R., Manyin, Mark E., Jurenas, Remy, and Platzer, Michales D. 2014. “The U.S.-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA): Provision and Implementation,” CRS Report: prepare for Members and Committees of Congress, Congressional Research Service, pp.7. Young, Deborah De. 2002. “U.S. Congress and Korea Policy,” in Baek Jong-Chun, Lee Sang-Hyun, eds., Korea-U.S. Relations in Transition: Korea-U.S. Alliance in Retrospect and Prospects for a New Strategic Partnership. Seongnam: the Sejong Institute. 三、報紙新聞與網路資料 The National Interest, 2016, The Hard Truth About THAAD,〈http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-hard-truth-about-thaad-south-korea-china-15295〉, 2016/06/19. The National Interest, 2016, Ignore China and Deploy THAAD to South Korea, 〈http://nationalinterest.org/feature/ignore-china-deploy-thaad-south-korea-15810〉, 2016/06/19.1 The National Interest, 2016, THAAD More Useful as Stick Against China Than North Korean Missiles, 〈http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/thaad-more-useful-stick-against-china-north-korean-missiles-15243〉, 2016/06/19. Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, 〈https://history.state.gov/〉. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49122 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本篇論文的研究是目的是試圖以「霸權穩定理論」以及「聯盟理論」檢視韓美同盟的變遷，並透過軍事、經濟以及政治三個面向的分析，歸結韓美同盟歷年來的變化，以及南韓在1950年之後和美國互動過程中的權力狀況，並結論哪個理論更適合用於分析韓美同盟。
本篇論文首先系統性的整理「霸權穩定理論」以及「聯盟理論」的系譜脈絡，歸納出兩理論的獨特以及重疊之處，並試圖以指標檢視在兩理論重疊的狀況下該如何分析案例。而本篇論文的案例則分別為三個不同時期下的韓美同盟。第一個時期為南韓甫建政時的李承晚時期，第二個為朴正熙時期，第三個則為金大中—盧武鉉時期。此三個時期都是全球秩序及區域秩序改變的當口：在第一個時期中，南韓剛脫離被殖民狀態國力極弱，而全球秩序屬於兩極體系，南韓歸屬於自由主義陣營而美國則是自由主義陣營之首；到朴正熙時期，則是全球體系從緊密兩極過渡到鬆散兩極的過程，隨著美國在越南過度用兵、日本的經濟復甦，韓美同盟的互動模式也同時受到影響；最後，在金大中盧武鉉時期，2001年的911恐攻以及2004年韓國貿易夥伴的變化，都改變了韓美的互動方式。 由於此三個時期的變動狀況，讓韓美兩方為了守護自身國家利益必須相互角力，權力施展的狀況更為明顯，也讓理論在分析案例時更具有施展的空間。透過霸權穩定理的分析，不僅展現了霸權權力在全球、區域以及內政層次上的起伏；而聯盟理論則也透析了在不同權力消長的時期，雙方對於彼此同盟形態的認知以及互動狀況。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis discusses the transition of the ROK–U.S. alliance and the alliance as such using the following two theories: the theory of hegemonic stability and the Alliance Theory.
Chapter 1 outlines the purpose, the structure, and the literature review of the research. Chapter 2 discusses the two theories underlying this research. It attempts to re-conceptualize the theories while analyzing the unique and overlapping areas of the two theories. Furthermore, this chapter sets up the standards by which to inspect the appropriation of these theories. Chapter 3 deals with the first period under examination: the ROK under Syngman Rhee. This chapter will compare the different strategies and attitudes Syngman Rhee adopted in dealing with the United States and the tactics used by the United States to control the ROK and interfere with the interior political issues of the ROK. Chapter 4 examines the Park Chung-Hee era, during which the ROK gradually gained its economic independence. Consequently, the ROK developed greater bargaining power in dealing with the United States and the government of the ROK also demonstrated its intention to develop its own defense policies. Chapter 5 covers the Kim Dae-Jung and Roh Moo-Hyun era, during which the interaction of these two nations shifted fundamentally. The reason for this shift can be attributed to the economic strength that the ROK has gained from the 1970s onwards, especially after 2004, the year when China officially became the first economic partner of the ROK followed by the United States. This astonishing change in the economic partnerships caught the attention of the United States officials and forced them to rethink their economic strategies in the ROK. The citizens of ROK also started to consider the war crimes committed by the United States army and the appropriateness of the interference of the United States. Furthermore, the criminal behaviors of the USFK soldiers also triggered anti-American sentiments among ROK citizens, resulting in an eventual disruption of the two nations’ civil connections and a decrease in the effectiveness of the United States. The final chapter provides a conclusion to the thesis and analyzes the transition of the ROK–U.S. alliance. It also lays the standards to conduct further studies for fellow researchers. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:16:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R01322035-1.pdf: 2914553 bytes, checksum: 10f48c0cc0bb419b7aab86b84064b5d5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
口試委員審定書 I 謝 辭 II 中文摘要 VII 英文摘要 VIII 目 錄 X 圖表目錄 XII 表目錄 XII 圖目錄 XIII 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究問題與目的 4 第三節、文獻回顧 5 第四節、研究方法與研究限制 26 第五節、研究範圍與分析框架 28 第六節、章節安排 34 第貳章 霸權穩定理論與聯盟理論的對話 37 第一節、霸權穩定理論的討論 37 第二節、聯盟理論的討論 44 第三節、霸權穩定理論及聯盟理論的討論 52 第參章 李承晚時期—美國扶植政權 55 第一節 軍事關係： 威脅來源與安全需求 55 第二節 經濟關係： 完全的互賴 62 第三節 政治關係： 體制、價值偏好與民意支持 67 第四節 小結 72 第肆章 朴正熙時期─經濟部份自主 81 第一節 軍事關係：威脅來源與安全需求 81 第二節 經濟關係：不對稱互賴 87 第三節 政治關係：體制、價值偏好與民意支持 94 第四節 小結 100 第伍章 金大中盧武鉉時期─軍事的霸權 105 第一節 軍事關係：威脅來源與安全需求 105 第二節 經濟關係：經濟自由化後的南韓 113 第三節 政治關係：體制、價值偏好與民意支持 122 第四節 小結 126 第陸章 結論 133 第一節、研究發現 133 第二節、研究限制與展望 142 參考文獻 145 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 美國 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 霸權穩定理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 聯盟理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 韓美同盟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 南韓 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 李承晚 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 朴正熙 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 金大中 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 盧武鉉 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | the Hegemonic Stability Theory | en |
| dc.subject | ROK—U.S. Alliance | en |
| dc.subject | Roh Moo-Hyun | en |
| dc.subject | Park Chung-Hee | en |
| dc.subject | Kim Dae-Jung | en |
| dc.subject | the United States | en |
| dc.subject | Syngman Rhee | en |
| dc.subject | Republic of Korea | en |
| dc.subject | the Theory of Alliance | en |
| dc.title | 韓美同盟的演變：霸權穩定理論與聯盟理論的對話 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | ROK – U.S. Alliance: The Colloquy of the Theory of Hegemonic Theory and the Alliance Theory | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 邱坤玄(Kun-Shuan Chiu),盧業中(Yeh-Chung Lu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 韓美同盟,霸權穩定理論,聯盟理論,南韓,美國,李承晚,朴正熙,金大中,盧武鉉, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | ROK—U.S. Alliance,the Hegemonic Stability Theory,the Theory of Alliance,Republic of Korea,the United States,Syngman Rhee,Park Chung-Hee,Kim Dae-Jung,Roh Moo-Hyun, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 158 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603256 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.85 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。