請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48954完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周繼祥教授(Jih-shine Chou),姜皇池教授(Huang-chih Chiang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsi-hu Lai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賴璽互 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:12:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻： 一、中文文獻 （一）專書： 1. 孔恩著，程樹德等譯（1989）。《科學革命的結構（The Structure of Scientific Revolution）》，二版。臺北：遠流出版社。 2. 姜皇池（2018）。《國際海洋法，上冊》，二版。臺北：新學林出版社。 3. 姜皇池（2018）。《國際海洋法，下冊》，二版。臺北：新學林出版社。 4. 格勞秀斯（Grotius）、何勤華等譯（2005），《戰爭與和平》，初版。上海：上海人民出版社。 5. 盛紅生、楊澤偉、秦小軒（2003）。《武力的邊界-21世紀前期武裝衝突中的國際法問題研究》，初版。北京：時事出版社。 （二）期刊與專書論文： 1. 李廷康（2019），〈安理會授權使用武力:中國的政策和策略研究〉，《國際政治研究》，2期，頁115-142。 2. 林天杰（2015），〈海上軍事行動武力使用的法律問題〉，《西安政治學報》，28卷2期，頁77-82。 3. 易平（2008），〈國際法視野下的預防性自衛〉，《廈門大學法律評析》，15輯，頁92-156。 4. 郁瑞麟（2019），〈從國際法及兩岸關係面向思考我國臺灣海峽的航行制度規範〉，《國立中正大學法學集刊》，62期，頁1-41。 5. 姜皇池（1999），〈由國際海峽制度論臺灣海峽與澎湖水道法律定位問題—基線劃定之可能與影響，兼論《領海法》相關條文〉，《臺灣大學法學論叢》，28 卷3期，89-177。 6. 姜皇池（2019），〈從國際法檢視中國大陸軍艦與軍事航空器繞臺行為之部分法律議題〉，《軍法專刊》，65卷2期，頁30-74。 7. 姜皇池（2019），〈論克赤海峽事件所涉部分國際法議題〉，《軍法專刊》，65卷4期，頁45-51。 8. 陳貞如（2020），〈論海上軍事活動之國際法規範〉，《政大法學評論》160期，頁1-52。 9. 曹成程（2013），〈全球視域下交戰規則的起源與發展〉，《西安政治學院學報》，26卷6期，頁94-100。 10. 楊永明（1996），〈國際法與禁止武力使用和威脅〉，《美歐月刊》，11卷2期，頁92-108。 11. 趙國材（2006），〈論美國測量船「鮑迪奇號」（USNS Bowditch）擅闖中國專屬經濟區事件〉，《律師雜誌》，327期，頁40-51。 12. 謝丹、胡文巧（2012），〈交戰規則相關問題研究〉，《法學雜誌》，7期，頁28-33。 13. 魏靜芬（1997），〈論軍事演習在國際法上的地位〉，《軍法專刊》，43卷6期，頁20-30。 二、英文文獻 （一）專書： 1. ANTHONY CLARK AREND ROBERT J. BECK (1993), INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE USE OF FORCE (New York: Routledge). 2. ANTHONY P.V. ROGERS PAUL MALHERBE (1999), FIGHT IN RIGHT: MODEL MANUAL ON THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT FOR ARMED FORCES (Switzerland: International Committee of the Red Cross Press). 3. BRADD C.HAYES (1989), NAVAL RULES OF ENGAGEMENT : MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR CRISIS, HTTPS://APPS.DTIC.MIL/DTIC/TR/FULLTEXT/U2/A228098.PDF 4. BOUCHARD, JOSEPH FREDERICK (1989), USE OF NAVAL FORCE IN CRISES: A THEORY OF STRATIFIED CRISIS INTERACTION VOLUME 2 (CALIFORNIA: STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS). 5. COMMANDER ALAN COLE UNITED KINGDOM ROYAL NAVY EDS. (2009), RULES OF ENGAGEMENT HANDBOOK, HTTP://IIHL.ORG/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/2017/11/ROE-HANDBOOK-ENGLISH.PDF 6. CANADIAN THE CHIEF THE DEFENCE STAFF (2008), CANADIAN FORCES (CF) PUB B-GJ-005-501/FP-001, CFJP-5.1 USE OF FORCE FOR CF OPERATIONS. 7. CORN, G.S. VANLANDINGHAM, R.E. REEVES, S.R. (2015), U.S. MILITARY OPERATIONS: LAW, POLICY, AND PRACTICE (OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS). 8. DIRECTOR LTC PAMELA STAHL ET. AL. (2004), LEGAL LESSONS LEARNED FROM AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ VOLUME I (VIRGINIA: UNITED STATES ARMY CHARLOTTESVILLE). 9. INTERNATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL LAW DEPARTMENT(2017), OPERATIONAL LAW HANDBOOK, https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/operational-law-handbook_2017.pdf 10. J.F.R.BODDENS HOSANG(2017), RULES OF ENGAGEMENT:RULES ON THE USE OF FORCE AS LINCHPIN FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF MILITARY OPERATIONS, https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/7940990/Boddens_Hosang_Thesis_complete.pdf 11. MICHAEL HOWARD PETER PARET eds. trans. (1976), KARL VON CLAUSETZ ON WAR (Princeton University Press). 12. MR SHERROD LEWIS BUMGARDNER ed. (2010), NATO LEGAL DESKBOOK 2nd ed., https://info.publicintelligence.net/NATO-LegalDeskbook.pdf 13. O'CONNELL DANIEL PATRICK (1975), THE INFLUENCE OF LAW ON SEA POWER (Maryland：Naval Institute Press). 14. PEACEKEEPING BEST PRACTICES UNIT DPKO (2003), HANDBOOK ON MULTIDIMENSIONAL PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS (New York: United Nations), https://peacekeeping.un.org/sites/default/files/peacekeeping-handbook_un_dec2003_0.pdf 15.THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES(1987), REPORT ON THE STAFF INVESTIGATION INTO THE IRAQI ATTACK ON THE USS STARK, https://www.jag.navy.mil/library/investigations/USS%20STARK%20BASIC.pdf 16.TERRY D. GILL DIETER FLECK eds. (2015), THE HANDBOOK OF THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF MILITARY OPERATIONS 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press). 17. UNITED STATES NAVY DEPT. (1948), UNITED STATES NAVY REGULATIONS 1948(Washington U. S. Govt. Print. Off). 18. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (1955), LAW OF NAVY WARFARE NWIP10-2 (Washington U.S. Navy Dept.). https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/l/law-naval-warfare-nwip-10-2-1955/law-naval-warfare-chapters-1-6.html. 19. U.S. DOD COMMISSION(1983), REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON BEIRUT INTERNATIONAL AIR RORT TERRORIST ACT OF 23 OCTOBER 1983, https://fas.org/irp/threat/beirut-1983.pdf. 20. U.S.DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY(1987), FORMAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE ATTACK ON THE USS STARK (FFG 31) ON 17 MAY 1987, https://www.jag.navy.mil/library/investigations /USS%20STARK %20BASIC.pdf 21. U.S. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (2016), THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LAW OF WAR MANUAL, https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190 22. UNITED STATES CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF (2016), JOINT PUBLICATION 1-02 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DICTIONARY OF MILITARY AND ASSOCIATED TERMS, https://fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp1_02.pdf 23. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT US NAVY (2017), THE COMMANDER’S HANDBOOK ON THE LAW OF NAVAL OPERATIONS NWP 1-14M, https://www.hsdl.org/?view did=806860 24. U.S. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (2019), ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENT INVOLVING THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, https://media.defense.gov/2019/May/02/2002127082/1/1/1/2019_CHINA _MILITARY _POWER_REPORT.pdf 25. WESTERN PACIFIC NAVAL SYMPOSIUM(2014),CODE FOR UNPLANNED ENCOUNTERS AT SEA , https://www.jag.navy.mil/distrib/instructions/CUES_2014.pdf （二）期刊與專書論文： 1. Anh Duc, Ton (2017), Code for unplanned encounters at sea and its practical limitations in the East and South China Seas, 9(4) AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MARITIME OCEAN AFFAIRS 227-239. 2. Cooper, C. (2014), Rules of Engagement Demystified: A Study of the History, Development, and Use of ROEs, 53(2) MILITARY LAW AND LAW OF WAR REVIEW, 189-246. 3. Drake, Ricky J.(1992), The Rules of Defeat: The Impact of Aerial Rules of Engagement on USAF Operations in North Vietnam 1965-1968, AIR UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ADVANCED AIR POWER STUDIES, https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/nat-sec/Vietnam/Rolling-Thunder-and-the-Law-of-War.html 4. Dale Stephens (1998), Rules of Engagement and the Concept of Unit Self Defense, 45 NAVAL LAW REVIEW 126-151. 5. Faix, M. (2010), Rules of Engagement–Some Basic Questions and Current Issues. CZECH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 133-145. 6. George Bunn (1986), International Law and the Use of Force in Peacetime: Do U.S. Ships Have to Take the First Hit? 39(3) NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW 69-80. 7. Hall, D.B. (1997), United States Marine Corps, Rules of Engagement and Non-Lethal Weapons: A Deadly Combination? at GlobalSecurity.org. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1997/Hall.htm. 8. J.F.R. BODDENS HOSANG (2008), Self-Defense in Military Operations: The Interaction between the Legal Bases for Military Self-Defense and Rules of Engagement, 47(1) MILITARY LAW AND LAW OF WAR REVIEW 25-96. 9. Martins, M. S.(1994), Rules of engagement for land forces: a matter of training, not lawyering, 143(1)MILITARY LAW REVIEW, 1-160. 10. Morris, S. R. (1994), Rules of Engagement: Origin, Practical Use, Doctrinal Integration, and Theoretical Concept. (unpublished article on file with the US Army Center for Law and Military Operations). 11. Maxwell, M. D. (2002), Individual Self-Defense and the Rules of Engagement: Are the two Mutually Exclusive, 41 MILITARY LAW AND LAW OF WAR REVIEW, 39-54. 12. Major William R. Hittinger (2002), Rules Of Engagement As A Force Multiplier, CSC2000 1-50, https://smallwarsjournal.com/documents/hittinger.pdf 13. Murswiek, D. (2003), The American Strategy of Preemptive War and International Law, UNIVERSITÄT FREIBURG INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC LAW PAPERS 1-15. 14. Major Winston S. Williams (2012), Training the Rules of Engagement for the Counterinsurgency Fight, DA PAM 27-50-464 THE ARMY LAWYER, 42-49. 15. O'Donnell, B.T. Kraska, J. C.(2002), International Law of Armed Conflict and Computer Network Attack: Developing the Rules of Engagement, 76 INTERNATIONAL LAW STUDIES SERIES.US NAVAL WAR COLLEGE 395-419. 16. O’Connell, M.E. (2002), The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW TASK FORCE ON TERRORISM PAPERS, 1-21. 17. Parks, W.Hays (1982), Rolling Thunder and the Laws of War, in Air University Review, AIR UNIVERSITY REVIEW, https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/nat-sec/Vietnam/Rolling-Thunder-and-the-Law-of-War.html 18. Parks, W. Hays (1989), Righting the Rules of Engagement 115(5) U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS 83-93, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1989/may/righting-rules-engagement 19. Parks, W. Hays (2001), Deadly Force is Authorized 127(1) U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2001/january/deadly-force-authorized 20. Phillips, G. R. (1993), Rules of Engagement: A Primer, 7 ARMY LAW, 4-27. 21. Roach, J. A. (1983), Rules of engagement, 36(1) NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW 46-55. 22. Ronald O'Rourke (1989), Gulf Ops VOL. 115(5) U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1989/may/gulf-ops 23.Richard J. Grunawalt (1997), The JCS Standing Rules of Engagement: A Judge Advocate's Primer, 42 AIR FORCE LAW REVIEW, 245-258. 24. Sagan, S. D. (1991), Rules of engagement, in AVOIDING WAR-PROBLEMS OF CRISIS MANAGEMENT (Alexander L. George ed.); Sagan, S. D. (1991), Rules of engagement, 1(1) SERCURTY SRUDIES, 78-108. 25. Stephen A. Myrow (1996-1997), Waging War on the Advice of Counsel: The Role of Operational Law in the Gulf War, 7 U.S. A.F. ACAD. J. LEGAL STUD., 131-158. 26.Zwanenburg, M., Hosang, H. B., Wijngaards, N. J (2005), Humans, Agents and International Humanitarian Law: Dilemmas in Target Discrimination, NETHERLANDS MINISTRY OF DEFENSE, DIRECTORATE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/38cb/e3fad6284295fcfc0e6e58bd6c4fa97c9ed7.pdf?_ga=2.46260775.1485594977.1590331684-68531838.1590331684 三、網路資源 1.《執行1982年12月10日「聯合國海洋法公約」有關養護與管理跨界魚類種群和高度洄游魚類種群的規定的協定》, https://www.ofdc.org.tw:8181/web/comp onents/Editor/webs/files/UNConvention 1982.pdf。 2. Charter of the United Nations, CHAPTER VII: ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION Article 42 available at https://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/chapter-vii/index.html 3. Charter of the United Nations, CHAPTER VII: ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION Article 51 available at https://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/chapter-vii/index.html 4. Cambridge Dictionary, 'dormant,' https://dictionary.cambridge.org/zht/%E8%A 9%9E%E5%85%B8/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E-%E6%BC%A2%E8%AA%9E-%E7%B9%81%E9%AB%94/dormant 5. Centre for International Law National University of Singapore, J. Ashley Roach profile, available at https://cil.nus.edu.sg/profile/?user=ash.roach 6. Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, ' Rules of Engagement,' Encyclopædia Britannica, available at https://www.britannica.com/topic/rules-of-engagement-military-directives. 7. FRANCE-UNITED STATES 1928, ' Kellogg-Briand Pact' Encyclopaedia Britannica available at https://www.britannica.com/event/Kellogg-Briand-Pact. 8. Joint Chiefs of Staff-Joint Doctrine Library(2020), DOD DICTIONARY OF MILITARY AND ASSOCIATED TERMS, available at https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf?ver=2020-01-24-100230-123 9. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), The North Atlantic Treaty, available at https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm 10. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (February 07, 2006), Afghanistan: NATO Troops Apply Robust New Rules Of Engagement, available at http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1065518.html 11. The New York Times (May 21, 1987), CAPTAIN OF STARK SAYS SHIP FAILED TO DETECT MISSILES, available at https://www.nytimes.com/1987/05/21/world/captain-of-stark-says-ship-failed-to-detect-missiles.html. 12. The Washington Free Beacon (Oct. 12, 2018), Bolton Warns Chinese Military to Halt Dangerous Naval Encounters, available at https://freebeacon.com/national-security/bolton-warns-chinese-military-halt-dangerous-naval-encounters/ 13. The Maritime Executive (April 30, 2019), Fact Sheet: The People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia (PAFMM), available at https://www.maritimeexecutive.com/editorials/ fact-sheet-the-people-s-armed-forces-maritime-militia-pafmm 14. The GUYANA and SURINAME Case(September 17, 2007), Award of the Arbitral Tribunal Constituted pursuant to Article 287 and in accordance with Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, available at https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/902 15. UN Security Council, RESOLUTION 940 (1994), available at http://unscr.com/en/ resolutions/940 16.UN Security Council, RESOLUTION 1031 (1995), available at http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/1031. 17. UN Security Council, RESOLUTION 1973 (2011), available at https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/s/res/1973-%282011%29 18. UN Security Council Resolution 1814,1816, 1844, 1846, 1851, 1897 The situation in Somalia , available at http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/1838 四、新聞資料 （一）中文新聞： 1. 自由評論網（04/20/2020），〈是漁民？還是海上民兵？〉，https://talk.ltn.com.tw/ article/paper/ 1367096。 2. 中華民國國防部網站（04/23/2020），〈國防部發布新聞稿說明「中共遼寧號航空母艦編隊結束南海航訓，再次航經巴士海峽續向東航行」乙情〉，https://www.mnd.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?p=76977 title=%e5%9c%8b%e9%98%b2%e6%b6%88%e6%81%af SelectStyle=%e6%96%b0%e8%81%9e%e7%a8%bf。 3. 中國大陸國防部官方網站，《中華人民共和國民兵工作條例》第2條，http://www.mod.gov.cn/big5/regulatory/2016-02/12/content_4618055.htm。 4. 海洋委員會海巡新聞（03/19/2020），〈金門海巡護漁遭大陸快艇集體攻擊案說明〉，https://www.cga.gov.tw/GipOpen/wSite/ct?xItem=140919 ctNode= 650 mp= 999。 （二）外文新聞： 1. CNN (May 1, 2013), Bin Laden's death: How the story unfolded, available at https://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/01/world/bin-laden-recap/index.html 2. The Washington post (July 4, 1988), GULF RULES OF ENGAGEMENT A DILEMMA FOR U.S. First Press Release 04071988, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1988/07/04/gulf-rules-of-engagement-a-dilemma-for-us/510b784b-a018-41dc-902f-554e5dd83653/ 3. The National Interest (May 1, 2019), The Ultimate Way to Deter China: Why Island-Chain Defense Can Work, available at https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/ultimate-way-deter-china-why-island-chain-defense-can-work-61942. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48954 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 交戰規則（ROE）為現今國家執行軍事性行動的武力管控機制，從國際實踐中可發現交戰規則的運用涵蓋於和平時期與戰爭時期（或可視為發生武裝衝突的狀態），分界線就是決定武力使用的那一時刻。換言之，和平時期交戰規則針對軍事性行動做出規範限制外，也包括對於武力使用的限制，在非武裝衝突情況下，係對「敵對行為」或「敵對意圖」做出防禦性且必要的對應，以自衛權為前提，並提供相關行使該權利的規範。 而交戰規則中所承載的《武裝衝突法》係國家之間於發生武裝衝突時，規定國家可以武力使用的情況與方式，它並不關心武力使用的合法性。故一旦發生武裝衝突時，《武裝衝突法》就適用，亦必須符合軍事必要、區分、比例與人道原則。其目的在於儘量降低戰爭所造成的苦難、損失與破壞。職是之故，以海上軍事性行動為例，在未進入武裝衝突前，交戰規則的制訂，除考量《武裝衝突法》外，亦應體現《聯合國憲章》、《國際人道法》、《海洋法公約》等相關國際法規。 本論文爬梳了交戰規則的歷史脈絡與發展過程、國際間交戰規則的基本原則與形式，與探討交戰規則所應具備的法律地位與內涵，整理出關於和平時期交戰規則的行使要件與運用時機，藉以瞭解國際間交戰規則的具體實踐與可能樣貌，並進一步探討出我臺灣周邊海域的可能運用方式。時逢我國交戰規則政策發展之際，期能提供較有系統性的研究與整理，拋磚引玉讓國內學界或國防政策單位對於交戰規則的議題有更深入的瞭解與探討。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The “Rules of Engagement(ROE)” is the control mechanism of using the force when countries execute military operations nowadays. From international practice and experience, The ROE covers the utilization in two different phases: peacetime and wartime (or can be regarded as a state of armed conflict). The dividing line is depended on the moment of using the force. In other words, the peacetime ROE limits military operations, including the use of force, to execute defensive and necessary responses to hostile acts or hostile intent in the situations of nonarmed conflict. They are premised on the right of self-defense and provided rules for the execution. The 'Law of Armed Conflict' contained in the Rules of Engagement stipulates the circumstances and ways in which a country can use force when an armed conflict occurs between countries. It does not care about the legality of the use of force. Therefore, once an armed conflict occurs, the 'Armed Conflict Law' is applicable and must also comply with the principles of military necessity, distinction, proportionality, and humanity. Its purpose is to minimize the suffering, loss, and destruction caused by war. Taking maritime military operations as an example, the formulation of the rules of engagement should not only consider the 'Law of Armed Conflict', but also reflect the 'United Nations Charter', 'International Humanitarian Law' and ' United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea' and other relevant international laws and regulations. This thesis reviews the history and development process, the basic principles and forms, the legal status and connotation, and the requirements and application timing of the ROE in peacetime. By understanding the specific practice and the possible appearance of the international ROE, and possible uses of ROE in the waters surrounding Taiwan is discussed. During the time that our country is developing ROE policy now, we hope to provide more systematic research and analysis to attract domestic academic circles or national defense policy units to have a deeper understanding and discussion on the issue of ROE. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:12:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1308202005041600.pdf: 4453786 bytes, checksum: d75072a2caef4bca928bb340d8c683a8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 口試委員會審定書 i 謝誌 iii 中文摘要 v Abstract vii 目錄 ix 圖目錄 xiii 表目錄 xiv 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究緣起 1 第二節 研究動機與研究目的 3 壹、 研究動機 3 貳、 研究目的 5 第三節 研究途徑及研究方法 6 壹、 研究途徑 6 貳、 研究方法 7 第四節 研究範圍與研究限制 7 壹、 研究範圍 7 貳、 研究限制 8 第五節 研究架構與章節安排 9 壹、 研究架構 9 貳、 章節安排 9 第六節 文獻探討與概念界定 10 壹、 文獻探討 10 貳、 概念界定 15 第二章 交戰規則的發展歷程 17 第一節 二次世界大戰之前的概念 17 第二節 二次世界大戰後至越戰時期的發展 21 第三節 越戰後迄今的發展 26 第三章 和平時期交戰規則的內涵 33 第一節 交戰規則基本原則 33 壹、 交戰規則的定義與概念 33 貳、 交戰規則的目的 37 參、 交戰規則的形式 43 第二節 交戰規則的法律地位問題 52 壹、 交戰規則承載之法源 52 貳、 與國內法、國際法的關係 54 參、 交戰規則與自衛權的關係 58 第三節 行使要件與運用時機的探討 62 壹、 非武力使用之範疇 64 貳、 武力使用之範疇 72 參、 衍生之爭議問題 78 第四章 和平時期交戰規則於臺灣海域周邊之運用 85 第一節 我海上交戰規則之擬定與考量因素 85 壹、 交戰規則擬定程序 85 貳、 綜合考量因素 91 第二節 與中國大陸軍艦接觸之交戰規則 96 壹、 案例狀況 96 貳、 擬定交戰規則 96 參、 應具備之交戰規則 100 第三節 與中國大陸海上民兵船接觸的交戰規則 103 壹、 中共大陸海上民兵概略介紹 103 貳、 案例狀況 104 參、 擬定交戰規則 105 肆、 應具備之交戰規則 109 第四節 小結 111 第五章 結 論 115 第一節 研究發現 115 壹、 歷史發展部分 115 貳、 實質內涵部分 117 參、 制定交戰規則部分 119 第二節 建 議 121 壹、 對後續研究之建議 121 貳、 政策建議 122 參考文獻： 125 附錄：聖雷莫交戰手冊系列清單 133 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 自衛權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 海上軍事行動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 武力使用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 和平時期交戰規則 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Right of self-defense | en |
| dc.subject | Maritime military operations | en |
| dc.subject | Rules of engagement in peacetime | en |
| dc.subject | Use of force | en |
| dc.title | 和平時期「交戰規則(Rules of Engagement)」之研究：以海上軍事行動為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A study of “Rules of Engagement” in peacetime: take the maritime military operations for example. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡季廷教授(Chi-Ting Tsai),郁瑞麟教授(Ruei-Lin Yu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 和平時期交戰規則,自衛權,武力使用,海上軍事行動, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Rules of engagement in peacetime,Right of self-defense,Use of force,Maritime military operations, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 158 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003191 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國家發展研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1308202005041600.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。