Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物產業傳播暨發展學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48910
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor許詩嫺(Shih-Hsien Hsu)
dc.contributor.authorYu-Huay Hsuen
dc.contributor.author徐如慧zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T11:11:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-28
dc.date.copyright2020-10-08
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-08-14
dc.identifier.citationAaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name: New York: The Free Press.
Alam, M. S., Khan, B. M. (2015). Impact of social media on brand equity: A literature analysis. AIMA Journal of Management Research, 9(4), 1-12.
Alhabash, S., Ma, M. Y. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media + Society, 3(1). doi:10.1177/2056305117691544
Asghar, H. M. (2015). Measuring information seeking through Facebook: Scale development and initial evidence of Information Seeking in Facebook Scale (ISFS). Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 259-270.
Bisschoff, C., Moolla, A. (2014). A simplified model to measure brand loyalty. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues (ICCMI), Athens, Greece. June.
Boczkowski, P. J., Matassi, M., Mitchelstein, E. (2018). How young users deal with multiple platforms: The role of meaning-making in social media repertoires. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 245-259. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmy012
Chan, T. K., Cheung, C. M., Shi, N., Lee, M. K. (2015). Gender differences in satisfaction with Facebook users. Industrial Management Data Systems.
Chaudhuri, A., Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
Chu, S.-C., Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.
Cronin Jr, J. J., Brady, M. K., Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.
Davis, J. L., Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology Society, 36(4), 241-248. doi:10.1177/0270467617714944
DeVito, M. A., Birnholtz, J., Hancock, J. T. (2017). Platforms, people, and perception: Using affordances to understand self-presentation on social media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing.
Ellison, N. B., Gibbs, J. L., Weber, M. S. (2015). The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(1), 103-123. doi:10.1177/0002764214540510
Ellison, N. B., Gray, R., Lampe, C., Fiore, A. T. (2014). Social capital and resource requests on Facebook. New Media Society, 16(7), 1104-1121. doi:10.1177/1461444814543998
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (pp. 203-227).
Erdoğmuş, İ., Ergun, S. (2016). Understanding university brand loyalty: The mediating role of attitudes towards the department and university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 141-150.
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., Treem, J. W. (2016). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35-52.
Faraj, S., Azad, B. (2013). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In (pp. 237-258).
Fox, J., McEwan, B. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298-318. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
Frison, E., Eggermont, S. (2016). Gender and Facebook motives as predictors of specific types of Facebook use: A latent growth curve analysis in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 52, 182-190.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception: Psychology Press.
Gommans, M., Krishman, K. S., Scheffold, K. B. (2001). From brand loyalty to e-loyalty: A conceptual framework. Journal of Economic Social Research, 3(1).
Guynn, J. (2018). Bye Facebook, hello Instagram: Users make beeline for Facebook-owned social network. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2018/03/22/bye-facebook-hello-instagram-users-make-beeline-facebook-owned-social-network/433361002/
Halpern, D., Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159-1168. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
Hartman, K. B., Spiro, R. L. (2005). Recapturing store image in customer-based store equity: a construct conceptualization. Journal of Business Research, 58(8), 1112-1120.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford publications.
Hong, S., Na, J. (2018). How Facebook is perceived and used by people across cultures: The implications of cultural differences in the use of Facebook. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 435-443. doi:10.1177/1948550617711227
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts, and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. doi:10.1177/S0038038501000219
Jacoby, J., Chestnut, R. W. (1978). Brand loyalty measurement and management.
Jaidka, K., Zhou, A., Lelkes, Y. (2019). Brevity is the soul of Twitter: The constraint affordance and political discussion. Journal of Communication, 69(4), 345-372. doi:10.1093/joc/jqz023
Kaspar, K., Müller-Jensen, M. (2019). Information seeking behavior on Facebook: The role of censorship endorsement and personality. Current Psychology, 1-12.
Kim, J., Morris, J. D., Swait, J. (2008). Antecedents of true brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 99-117.
Laroche, M., Habibi, M. R., Richard, M.-O., Sankaranarayanan, R. (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1755-1767. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.016
Lau, G. T., Lee, S. H. (1999). Consumers' trust in a brand and the link to brand loyalty. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4(4), 341-370.
Lin, K.-Y., Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009
Litt, E., Hargittai, E. (2016). The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media + Society, 2(1), 2056305116633482. doi:10.1177/2056305116633482
Mashable. (2019). U.S. users are leaving Facebook, new study claims. Retrieved from https://mashable.com/article/facebook-losing-users-us/
Nagy, P., Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media+ Society, 1(2), 2056305115603385.
Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. doi:10.2307/259373
Nikhashemi, S. R., Tarofder, A. K., Gaur, S. S., Haque, A. (2016). The effect of customers’ perceived value of retail store on relationship between store attribute and customer brand loyalty: Some insights from Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 432-438.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things: Basic books.
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33-44.
Paananen, A., Seppänen, M. (2013). Reviewing customer value literature: Comparing and contrasting customer values perspectives. Intangible Capital, 9(3), 708-729.
Parchoma, G. (2014). The contested ontology of affordances: Implications for researching technological affordances for collaborative knowledge production. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 360-368. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.028
Perrin, A. (2015, October 2015). Social media usage: 2005-2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015/
Pew Research Center. (2018). Teens, social media technology 2018. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., Kim, J. (2017). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effects of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 412-424. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004
Punniyamoorthy, M., Prasanna Mohan Raj, M. (2007). An empirical model for brand loyalty measurement. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 15(4), 222-233. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jt.5750044
Quan-Haase, A., Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology Society, 30(5), 350-361. doi:10.1177/0270467610380009
Salomon, D. (2013). Moving on from Facebook: Using Instagram to connect with undergraduates and engage in teaching and learning. College Research Libraries News, 74(8), 408-412.
Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276-288. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041
Sheldon, P., Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89-97.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., Gross, B. L. (1991). Consumption values and market choices: Theory and applications: South-Western Pub. Cinicinnati, OH.
Statista. (2019). Most popular social networks worldwide as of October 2019, ranked by number of active users (in millions). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
Tucker, W. T. (1964). The development of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(3), 32-35.
Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683.
Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M. (2018). Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media Society, 20(5), 1813-1831.
Whiting, A., Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal.
Woodall, T. (2003). Conceptualising ‘value for the customer’: an attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 12(1), 1-42.
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 587-613.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. doi:10.2307/1251446
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48910-
dc.description.abstract本研究探討了社群媒體能供性、感知價值與使用忠誠度,並以多層面:「象徵型」、「功能型」、「互動型」切入推論。為了深入了解使用者對 Facebook 與 Instagram 的認知知覺以及參與互動,本研究以能供性作為探究方向,並蒐集了 305 份網路與紙本問卷。研究結果發現社群媒體能供性對感知價值與使用忠誠度含有影響作用;而信任度是透過感知價值之能供性與使用忠誠度調節的中介模型中(moderated mediation)的關鍵調節變數。分析結果發現,若使用者在乎社群媒體平台所提供的性質與功能,他們便會產生評估與構成價值感知,且影響往後對於該社群媒體平台的使用行為與互動。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the relationship between affordance, perceived value, and usage loyalty with multi-dimensional aspects—symbolic, functional, and interactive. Online and paper surveys are collected (N = 305) to explore the participants’ cognitive perceptions and engagement toward Facebook and Instagram based upon an affordance approach. Findings indicated that site affordances contribute to perceived value and usage loyalty. Moreover, trust is a significant moderator through the mediated model of affordance and usage loyalty via perceived value. Results show that as participants care about the offering of social media platforms, they will evaluate and form value perceptions; thus, influencing their posterior behavior of commitment toward the corresponding social networking sites (SNSs).en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:11:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-1308202008434100.pdf: 1781360 bytes, checksum: b290d1586ff1c3fb8f3d8a547ce2de46 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2020
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsABSTRACT III
LIST OF FIGURES VII
LIST OF TABLES VIII
INTRODUCTION 1
LITERATURE REVIEW 4
AN OVERVIEW OF AFFORDANCE 4
SOCIAL MEDIA AFFORDANCES AND PERCEPTION 8
Value perception 8
Value perceptions on SNSs 9
USAGE LOYALTY 12
METHOD 16
SAMPLE AND PROCEDURE 16
MEASURES 17
Usage loyalty 17
Affordance 17
Perceived value of social media affordances 18
Trust 19
Demographic characteristics 20
DATA ANALYSIS 20
RESULTS 24
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS AND PAIRED T-TEST 24
Usage loyalty 24
Affordance 24
Perceived value 25
Trust 26
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AFFORDANCE AND PERCEIVED VALUE 28
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AFFORDANCE AND USAGE LOYALTY 28
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED VALUE AND USAGE LOYALTY 30
PERCEIVED VALUE AS THE MEDIATOR BETWEEN AFFORDANCE AND USAGE LOYALTY 32
TRUST AS THE MODERATOR FOR THE MEDIATION MODEL OF AFFORDANCE AND USAGE LOYALTY VIA PERCEIVED VALUE 34
DISCUSSIONS 39
REFERENCES 47
APPENDIX 51
APPENDIX A: ONLINE SURVEY CONSTRUCTS (ENGLISH VERSION) 51
APPENDIX B: ONLINE SURVEY CONSTRUCTS (CHINESE VERSION) 55
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectFacebookzh_TW
dc.subject使用忠誠度zh_TW
dc.subject感知價值zh_TW
dc.subject能供性zh_TW
dc.subject信任度zh_TW
dc.subjectInstagramzh_TW
dc.subject社群媒體zh_TW
dc.subjectsocial networking sitesen
dc.subjectaffordanceen
dc.subjectperceived valueen
dc.subjectusage loyaltyen
dc.subjecttrusten
dc.subjectFacebooken
dc.subjectInstagramen
dc.title由能供性觀點探討社群媒體感知價值對使用者忠誠度的影響
zh_TW
dc.titleThe influence of perceived value of social media affordances on SNS usage loyaltyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee韓義興(Yi-Hsing Han),劉好迪(Adrian Rauchfleisch)
dc.subject.keyword能供性,感知價值,使用忠誠度,信任度,Facebook,Instagram,社群媒體,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordaffordance,perceived value,usage loyalty,trust,Facebook,Instagram,social networking sites,en
dc.relation.page58
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202003197
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2020-08-17
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:生物產業傳播暨發展學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-1308202008434100.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.74 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved