請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48836完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊鏡堂(Jing-Tang Yang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Chieh Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王彥傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:10:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-08 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-02-08 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-10-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Azuma, A. (2012). The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming. Springer Science & Business Media.
Banala, S. K., & Agrawal, S. K. (2005). Design and optimization of a mechanism for out-of-plane insect winglike motion with twist. Journal of Mechanical Design, 127(4), 841-844. Combes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2003). Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(17), 2979-2987. Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F. O., & Sane, S. P. (1999). Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 284(5422), 1954-1960. Dickinson, M. H., (1996). Unsteady mechanisms of force generation in aquatic and aerial locomotion. American Zoologist, 36(6), 537–554. Drucker, E. G. and G. V. Lauder (1999). Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: Three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202(18), 2393-2412. Dudley, R. (2002). The biomechanics of insect flight: form, function, evolution. Princeton University Press, New Jersey. Ellington, C. P., Van Den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P., & Thomas, A. L. (1996). Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 384(6610), 626-630. Fei, Y. H. J., & Yang, J. T. (2015). Enhanced thrust and speed revealed in the forward flight of a butterfly with transient body translation. Physical Review E, 92(3), 033004. Fei, Y. H. J., & Yang, J. T. (2016). Importance of body rotation during the flight of a butterfly. Physical Review E, 93(3), 033124. Heathcote, S., Wang, Z., & Gursul, I. (2008). Effect of spanwise flexibility on flapping wing propulsion. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 24(2), 183-199. Hedrick, T. L., & Daniel, T. L. (2006). Flight control in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: the inverse problem of hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209(16), 3114-3130. Lehmann, F. O., Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. (2005). The aerodynamic effects of wing–wing interaction in flapping insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208(16), 3075-3092. Madangopal, R., Khan, Z. A., & Agrawal, S. K. (2006). Energetics-based design of small flapping-wing micro air vehicles. Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions on, 11(4), 433-438. McIntosh, S. H., Agrawal, S. K., & Khan, Z. (2006). Design of a mechanism for biaxial rotation of a wing for a hovering vehicle. Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions on, 11(2), 145-153. Mountcastle, A. M., & Daniel, T. L. (2009). Aerodynamic and functional consequences of wing compliance. Experiments in Fluids, 46(5), 873-882. Pines, D. J., & Bohorquez, F. (2006). Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development. Journal of Aircraft, 43(2), 290-305. Roll, J., Cheng, B., & Deng, X. (2015). An electromagnetic actuator for high-frequency flapping-wing micro air vehicles. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, 31(2), 400-414. Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2002). The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205(8), 1087-1096. Sane, S. P. (2003). The aerodynamics of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(23), 4191-4208. Shyy, W., Lian, Y., Tang, J., Viieru, D., & Liu, H. (2007). Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers (Vol. 22). Cambridge University Press, New York. Sunada, S., Kawachi, K., Watanabe, I., & Azuma, A. (1993). Performance of a butterfly in take-off flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 183(1), 249-277. Tanaka, H., & Shimoyama, I. (2010). Forward flight of swallowtail butterfly with simple flapping motion. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 5(2), 026003. Wood, R. J. (2008). The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, 24(2), 341-347. Wu, J. H., Zhang, Y. L., & Sun, M. (2009). Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier–Stokes equations. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212(20), 3313-3329. Yokoyama, N., Senda, K., Iima, M., & Hirai, N. (2013). Aerodynamic forces and vortical structures in flapping butterfly's forward flight. Physics of Fluids, 25 (2), 021902. Young, J., Walker, S. M., Bomphrey, R. J., Taylor, G. K., & Thomas, A. L. (2009). Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency. Science, 325(5947), 1549-1552. Yin, B., & Luo, H. (2010). Effect of wing inertia on hovering performance of flexible flapping wings. Physics of Fluids, 22(11), 111902. 章聿珩 (2010) 運動學參數對鳥類拍撲翼之升力影響. 台灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文. 王相博 (2013) 蝴蝶撲翼姿態對飛行影響之研究. 台灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48836 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文透過機構蝴蝶的設計,探討腹部及翅膀動態對其胸部旋轉動作之影響,並進一步改變流體作用力的方向。實驗觀察蝴蝶拍撲飛行時,腹部呈現規律的上下擺動及翅膀拍撲造成其胸部的旋轉動作(body rotation),而胸部的旋轉動作被認為與飛行控制有關。
為了解腹部及翅膀動態對胸部旋轉動作之影響,以實驗室枯葉蝶實驗參數與文獻中的動作參數做為機構設計依據,製作出腹部擺動與拍撲動作可以同步的機構蝴蝶。透過機構分別探討腹部動態和拍撲動作對胸部旋轉的影響,發現增加腹部擺動頻率對胸部角度振幅變化不顯著,而增加腹部佔身體重量的比例可以明顯的增加胸部角度振幅。翅膀的後掠使拍撲時能夠額外提供一個改變身體角度的力矩,提高拍翅頻率也能增加此力矩,造成更大的胸部角度振幅。而腹部動態與拍撲動作的交互作用下,身體可以產生與拍撲角度有相位差的俯仰動作,而此具有相位差的俯仰動作進一步能增加升力與推力,在流場中也看到,加上腹部動態確實改變射流的方向。本研究以機構模擬蝴蝶腹部動態,了解腹部動態如何影響胸部角度,改變流體作用力的方向,進而達到控制飛行方向與軌跡。為微型飛行器的控制提供嶄新的觀點。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this work, a robotic butterfly with new control method is created inspired by the flight dynamics of butterflies; the dynamic of the robot and the flow field generated are also scrutinized. The butterflies fly with significant body motion in nature. Their abdomen rotates periodically during flight, and lead to the body angle and wing kinematics change concurrently. Previous studies also suggest that the body motion and flight trajectories are closely integrated. These evidences show that it is highly possible that butterfly able to control their flight modes via abdomen movements, which motivates us to create a butterfly robot with controllable abdominal motion.
The body of our robot contains two parts - thorax and abdomen. The joint between them can fold as the real butterfly. The wing span and the weight of the robot are around 50 cm and 330 g, respectively. Two four–linker mechanisms were adopted to achieve flapping and abdominal motion, and were driven by a motor operated at 67 rpm. The mechanism allows the wing and abdomen to move synchronized. We recorded the motion of this robot with a camera by hinging it at the thorax, and then analyzed the interaction among the motions of thorax, wings and abdomen. The flow field generated by the robot were also analyzed with particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique. The results indicate that the abdominal motion largely affects the phase of thorax angle. For the test of the robot without the abdominal motion, the thorax and wing motion are in phase. The robot generates neither lift nor thrust with this motion since the down- and up-stroke jet are generated oppositely. In contrast, when the robot with abdominal motion, the phase of thorax angle is delayed, which is similar to that observed from the real butterflies. The flow field indicates that the directions of jet-flow generated in down- and up- stroke significantly twisted downward and backward, respectively, and are beneficial for robot to generate lift and thrust forces. Our current robot cannot generate enough lift to stay aloft, however, this work reveals the importance of the abdominal motion in the flight control of butterfly, which might be an alternative strategy to control MAVs in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:10:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03522109-1.pdf: 4597996 bytes, checksum: 093e61bcb7f10191ce57379c8dacb3f6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 vi 圖表目錄 ix 符號說明 xiii 第一章 前言 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2-1飛行之背景知識 4 2-1.1名詞介紹 4 2-1.2升力與阻力 5 2-1.3失速 5 2-1.4 Kutta-Joukowski 6 2-1.5 Wagner effect 6 2-2昆蟲飛行之空氣動力學 7 2-2.1名詞介紹 8 2-2.2翼前緣渦漩(leading edge vortex) 9 2-2.3翼尖渦漩(tip vortex) 10 2-2.4尾流捕獲效應(wake capture) 11 2-2.5夾翼與拋翼(clap and fling) 11 2-2.6翅膀旋轉(wing rotation) 12 2-2.7翅膀撓性(flexibility) 13 2-3拍撲微型飛行器 14 2-3.1連桿式機構 15 2-3.2其他機構 16 2-4蝴蝶之相關研究 17 2-4.1蝴蝶之構造 17 2-4.2身體慣性與流體之交互作用 19 2-4.3機構 21 第三章 研究方法 23 3-1 實驗對象 24 3-2 實驗參數與因次分析 25 3-3 機構設計 28 3-3.1 機構原型 28 3-3.2 機構成品 29 3-3.3 機構成品內部結構 31 3-4 動作分析 35 3-4.1 實驗設備與架設 35 3-4.2 動作分析後處理 39 3-5 流場分析 40 3-5.1 粒子影像測速儀實驗設備與架設 40 3-5.2 粒子影像測速儀原理 42 第四章 結果與討論 44 4-1 腹部主動動態之探討 45 4-1.1 擺動頻率 47 4-1.2 腹部重量 47 4-2 翅膀流體作用力之探討 49 4-3 腹部擺動與翅膀之交互作用 52 4-4 流場分析 55 第五章 結論與未來展望 61 5-1 結論 61 5-2未來工作 62 5-3 甘梯圖 63 參考文獻 64 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 微型飛行器控制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 仿生蝴蝶飛行器 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 腹部動態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 胸部旋轉動作 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | abdominal motion | en |
| dc.subject | control of MAVs | en |
| dc.subject | body rotation | en |
| dc.subject | butterfly-inspired MAV | en |
| dc.title | 腹部及翅膀動態對蝴蝶仿生飛行器控制之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Control of the Robotic Butterfly by Abdominal and Wings Motions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭振華(Zhen-Hua Guo),紀凱容(Kai-Jung Chi),趙怡欽(Yi-Chin Chao),楊瑞珍(Ruei-Jhen Yang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 仿生蝴蝶飛行器,腹部動態,胸部旋轉動作,微型飛行器控制, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | butterfly-inspired MAV,abdominal motion,body rotation,control of MAVs, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 66 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603646 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-10-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 機械工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.49 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
