Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4871
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陸洛(Luo Lu)
dc.contributor.authorKuang-Yu Yehen
dc.contributor.author葉光裕zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T17:49:15Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-13
dc.date.available2021-05-14T17:49:15Z-
dc.date.copyright2015-03-13
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-01-20
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
張妤玥、陸洛、陸昌勤、周君倚(2013)。<大中華地區主管領導風格與員工工作後果之關聯:以自我觀為調節變項>。《職業教育》,2卷,1-15。
黃家齊(譯)(2011)。組織行為學(十三版)(原作者:S. P. Robbins&T. A. Judge)。台北市:華泰文化。
R. B. Kennedy and D. A. Kennedy, 'Using the MyersBriggs Type Indicator in Career Counseling,' Journal of Employment Counseling, March 2004, pp. 3865-44.
T.A. Judge, J.E. Bono, R. Ilies, and M. Werner, “Personality and Leadership: A Review,” paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans,2000; and T.A. Judge, J.E. Bono, R. Ilies, and M. W. Gerhardt, “Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review,” Journal of Applied Psychology, August 2002, pp. 765-780.
J. Champy, “The Hidden Qualities of Great Leaders,” Fast Company 76(November 2003), p. 135.
R. J. Foti and M.A. Hauenstein, 'Pattern and Variable Approaches in Leadership Emergence and Effectiveness,' Journal of Applied Psychology, March 2007, pp. 347-355.
J. A. LePine, J. A. Colquitt, and A. Erez, 'Adaptability to Changing Task Contexts: Effects of General Cognitive Ability, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience,' Personnel Psychology 53 (2000), pp. 563-595.
T. Bogg and B. W. Roberts, 'Conscientiousness and Health-Related Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis of the Leading Behavioral Contributors to Mortality,' Psychological Bulletin 130, no. 6 (2004), pp. 887-919.
S. Lee and H.J. Klein, 'Relationships Between Conscientiousness, Self-Efficacy, Self-Deception, and Learning over Time,' Journal of Applied Psychology 87, no. 6 (2002), pp. 1175-1l82; G. J. Feist, 'A Meta-analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity,' Personality and Social Psychology Review 2, no. 4 ( 1998), pp. 290-309.
M. Weber, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons (trans.) (New York: The Free Press, 1947).
J. A. Conger and R. N. Kanungo, 'Behavioral Dimensions of Charismatic Leadership,' in J. A. Conger, R. N. Kanungo and Associates (eds.), Charismatic Leadership (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988), p. 79.
R.J. House and J. M. Howell,”Personality and Charismatic Leadership,” Leadership Quarterly 3(1992), pp.81-108; D. N. Den Hartog and P. L., “Leadership in Organizations,” in N. Anderson and D. S. Ones(eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, vol.2(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002), pp.166-187.
R.J. Richard and S.K. Thayer, The Charisma Factor: How to Develop Your Natural Leadership Ability(Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall, 1993).
B. Shamir, R. J. House, and M. B. Arthur, 'The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A SelfConcept Theory,' Organization Science, November 1993, pp. 577-594.
P. C. Nutt and R. W. Backoff, 'Crafting Vision,' Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1997, p. 309.
P. C. Nutt and R. W. Backoff, 'Crafting Vision,' Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1997, p. 312-314.
B.M.Bass,”Leadership: Good, Better, Best,” Organizational Dynamics, Winter 1985, pp. 26-40; and J. Seltzer and B. M. Bass,”Transformational Leadership: Beyond Initiation and Consideration,” Journal of Management, December 1990, pp. 693-703.
Burns, J. M. (1978), Leadership, New York:Harper and Row.
R. T. Keller, 'Transformational Leadership, Initialing Structure, and Substitutes for Leadership: A Longitudinal Study of Research and Development Project Team Performance,' Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 1 (2006), pp. 202-210.
Judge and Piccolo, 'Transformational and Transactional Leadership.'
H. Hetland, G. M. Sandal, and T. B. Johnsen, 'Burnout in the Information Technology Sector: Does Leadership matter?' European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 16, no. 1 (2007), pp. 58-75; and K. B. Lowe, K. G. Kroeck, and N. Sivasubramaniam, 'Effectiveness Correlates of Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of the MLQ Literature,' Leadership Quarterly. Fall 1996, pp. 385-425.
T. R. Mitchell, 'Matching Motivational Strategies with Organizational Contexts,' in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 19 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1997), pp. 60-62.
A. Maslow, Motivation and Personality (New York: Harper & Row, 1954).
F. Herzberg, B. Mausner, and B. Snyderman, Tire Motivation to Work (New York: Wiley, 1959).
D. C. McClelland, The Achieving Society (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1961); J. W. Atkinson and J. O. Raynor, Motivation and Achievement (Washington, DC: Winston, 1974); D. C. McClelland, Power: The Inner Experience (New York: Irvington, 1975); and M. J. Stahl, Managerial and Technical Motivation: Assessing Needs for Achievement, Power; and Affiliation (New York: Praeger, 1986).
D. C. McClelland and D. G. Winter, Motivating Economic Achievement (New York: The Free Press, 1969); and J.B. Miner, N. R. Smith, and J. S. Bracker, 'Role of Entrepreneurial Task Motivation in the Growth of Technologically Innovative Finns: Interpretations from Follow-up Data,' Journal of Applied Psychology, October 1994, pp. 627-630.
D. C. McClelland, Power; D. C. McClelland and D. H. Burnham, 'Power Is the Great Motivator,' Harvard Business Review, March-April 1976, pp. 100-1 JO; and R. E. Boyatzis, 'The Need for Close Relationships and the Manager's Job,' in D. A. Kolb, I. M. Rubin, and J. M. Mcintyre, Organizational Psychology: Readings on H11ma11 Behavior in Organizations, 4th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984), pp. 81-86.
D. G. Winter, 'The Motivational Dimensions of Leadership: Power, Achievement, and Affiliation,' in R. E. Riggio, S. E. Murphy, and F. J. Pirozzolo (eds.), Multiple Intelligences and Leadership (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbanrn, 2002), pp. 119-138.
R. de Charms, Personal Causation; The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior (New York: Academic Press, l 968).
Deci, Koestner, and Ryan, 'A Meta-analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation,' pp. 627-668.
K. M. Sheldon, A. J. Elliot, and R. M. Ryan, 'SelfConcordance and Subjective Well-being in Four Cultures,' Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 35, no. 2 (2004), pp. 209-223.
J. E. Bono and T. A. Judge, 'Self-Concordance at Work; Toward Understanding the Motivational Effects of Transformational Leaders,' Academy of Management Journal 46, no. 5 (2003), pp. 554-571.
J.P. Meyer, T. E. Becker, and C. Vandenberghe, 'Employee Commitment and Motivation: Analysis and Integrative Model,' Journal of Applied Psychology 89, no. 6 (2004), pp. 991-1007.
E. A. Locke, 'Toward a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives,' Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, May 1968, pp. 157-189.
P. C. Earley, P. Wojnaroski, and W. Prest, 'Task Planning and Energy Expended; Exploration of How Goals Influence Performance,' Journal of Applied Psychology, February 1987, pp. 107-114.
M. E. Tubbs, 'Goal Setting; A Meta-analytic Examination of the Empirical Evidence,' Journal of Applied Psychology, August 1986, pp. 474-483; E. A. Locke and G. P. Latham, 'Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation,' American Psychologist, September 2002, pp. 705-717; and E. A. Locke and G. P. Latham, 'New Directions in GoalSetting Theory,' Current Directions in Psychological Science 15, no. 5 (2006), pp. 265-268.
E. A. Locke and G. P. Latham, 'Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey,' American Psychologist 57, no. 9 (2002), pp. 705-717.
E. A. Locke, 'The Motivation to Work: What We Know,' Advances in Motivation and Achievement IO (1997), pp. 375~412; and Latham, Erez, and Locke, 'Resolving Scientific Disputes by the Joint Design of Crucial Experiments by the Antagonists,' pp. 753-772.
V. H. Vroom, Work and Motivation (New York: Wiley, 1964).
R. J. House, H. J. Shapiro, and M. A. Wahba, 'Expectancy Theory as a Predictor of Work Behavior and Attitudes: A Re-evaluation of Empirical Evidence,' Decision Sciences, January 1974, pp. 481-506.
H.J. Klein, “An Integrated Control Theory Model of Work Motivation,”Academy of Management Review, April 1989, pp. 150-172; E.A. Locke, “The Motivation Sequence, the Motivation Hub,and the Motivation Core,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, December 1991, pp. 288-299; and T.R. Mitchell, “Matching Motivational Strategies with Organizational Contexts,” pp.60-62.
J. R. Hackman and G. R. Oldham, 'Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory,' Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, August 1976, pp. 250-279; and J. R. Hackman and G. R. Oldham, Work Redesign (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980).
J. R. Hackman, 'Work Design,' in J. R. Hackman and J. L. Suttle (eds.), Improving life at Work (Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear, 1977), p. 129.
J. B. Miner, Theories of Organizational Behavior (Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press, 1980), pp. 231-266; B. T. Lober, R. A. Noe, N. L. Moeller, and M. P. Fitzgerald, 'A Meta-analysis of the Relation of Job Characteristics to Job Satisfaction;' Journal of Applied Psychology, May 1985, pp. 280-289; W. H. Glick, G.D. Jenkins, Jr., and N. Gupta, 'Method Versus Substance: How Strong Are Underlying Relationships Between Job characteristics and Attitudinal Outcomes?' Academy of Management Journal, September 1986, pp. 441-464; Y. Fried and G. R. Ferris, 'The Validity of the Job Characteristics Model: A Review and Meta-analysis,' Personnel Psychology, Summer 1987, pp. 287-322; S. J. Zaccaro and E. F. Stone, Incremental Validity of an Empirically Based Measure of Job characteristics,' Journal of Applied Psychology, May 1988, pp. 245-252; J. R. Rentsch and R. P. Steel, 'Testing the Durability of Job Characteristics as Predictors of Absenteeism over a SixYear Period,' Personnel Psychology, Spring 1998, pp. 165-190; S. J. Behson, E. R. Eddy, and S. J. Lorenzet, 'The Importance of the Critical Psychological States in the Job Characteristics Model: A Meta-analytic and Structural Equations Modeling Examination,' Current Research in Social Psychology, May 2000, pp. J 70- 189; and T. A. Judge, 'Promote Job satisfaction Through Mental Challenge,' in E. A Locke (ed.), Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior, pp. 75-89.
Hackman and Oldham, Work Redesign; Miner, Theories of Organizational Behavior; pp. 231-266; R. W. Griffin, 'Effects of Work Redesign on Employee Perceptions, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Long-Term Investigation,' Academy of Management Journal 34, no. 2 (1991), pp. 425-435; and J. L. Cotton, Employee Involvement (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993), pp. 141-172.
F. P. Margeson, M. D. Johnson, M.A. Campion, G. J. Medsker, and T. V. Mumford, 'Understanding Reactions to Job Redesign; A Quasi-Experimental Investigation of the Moderating Effects of Organizational Contact on Perceptions of Performance Behavior.”Personnel Psychology 39(2006),pp. 333-363
W. A. Randolph, 'Re-Thinking Empowerment: Why ls It So Hard to Achieve?' Organizational Dynamics, 29, no. 2 (2000), pp. 94-107; K. Blanchard, J. P. Carlos, and W. A Randolph, Empowerment Takes More Than a Minute, 2nd ed. (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2001); D. P. Ashmos, D. Duchon, R.R. McDaniel, Jr., and J. W. Huonker, 'What a Mess! Participation as a Simple Managerial Rule to ' Complexity' Organizations,' Journal of Management Studies,March 2002, pp. 189-206; and S. E.Seibert, S. R. Silver, and W. A Randolph, 'Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction' Academy of Management Journal 47, no. 3 (2004), pp. 332-349.
F. Heller, E. Pusic, G. Strauss, and B. Wilpert, Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998).
E. White, 'Opportunity Knocks, and It Pays a Lot Better,' Wall Street Journal, November 13, 2006, p. B3.
J. R. Schuster and P. K. Zingheim, 'The New Variable Pay: Key Design Issues,' Compensation & Benefits Review, March-April 1993, p. 28; K. S. Abosch, 'Variable Pay: Do We Have the Basics in Place?' Compensation & Benefits Review, July-August 1998, pp. 12-22; and K. M. Kuhn and M. D. Yockey, 'Variable Pay as a Risky Choice: Determinants of the Relative Attractiveness of Incentive Plans,' Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, March 2003, pp. 323-341.
M. Fein, 'Work Measurement and Wage Incentives,' Industrial Engineering, September 1973, pp. 49-51. For updated reviews of the effect of pay on performance, see G. D. Jenkins, Jr., N. Gupta, A. Mitra, and J. O. Shaw, 'Are Financial Incentives Related to Performance? A Metaanalytic Review of Empirical Research,' Journal of Applied Psychology, October 1998, pp. 777-787; and S. L. Rynes, B. Gerhart, and L. Parks, 'Personnel Psychology: Performance Evaluation and Pay for Performance,' Annual Review of Psychology 56, no. 1 (2005), pp. 571-600.
E. White, 'Employers Increasingly Favor Bonuses to Raises,' Wall Street Journal, August 28, 2006, p. B3; and J. S. Lublin, 'Boards Tie CEO Pay More Tightly to Performance,' Wall Street Journal, February 21, 2006, pp. A1,A14.
A. A. Buchko, 'The Effects of Employee Ownership on Employee Attitudes: A Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives,”Work and Occupation 19,no. 1 (1992), 59-78.
J. L. Pierce and C. A. Furo, 'Employee Ownership: Implications for Management,' Organizational Dynamics 18 no. 3 (I990), pp. 32-43.
D. Stamps, 'A Piece of the Action,' Training, March 1996, p. 66.
M. W. Barringer and G. T. Milkovich, 'A Theoretical Exploration of the Adoption and Design of Flexible Benefit Plans: A Case of Human Resource Innovation,' Academy of Management Review, April 1998, pp. 305-324; D. Brown, 'Everybody Loves Flex,' Canadian HRReporter, November 18, 2002, p. 1; J. Taggart, 'Putting Flex Benefits Through Their Paces,' Canadian HR Reporter, December 2, 2002, p. G3; and N. D. Cole and D. H. Flint, 'Perceptions of Distributive and Procedural Justice in Employee Benefits: Flexible Versus Traditional Benefit Plans,' Journal of Managerial Psychology 19,no. 1 (2004), pp. 19-40.
D. A. Decenzo and S. P. Robbins, Human Resource Management, 7th ed. (New York: Wiley, 2002), pp. 346-348.
S. E. Markham, K. D. Scott, and G. H. McKee, 'Recognizing Good Attendance: A Longitudinal, QuasiExperimental Field Study,' Personnel Psychology, Autumn 2002, p. 641; and S. J. Peterson and F. Luthans, 'The Impact of Financial and Non-financial Incentives on Business Unit Outcomes over Time,' Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 1 (2006), pp. 156-165.
S. Caudron, 'The Top 20 Ways to Motivate Employees,' Industry week, April 3, 1995, pp. 15- 16. See also B. Nelson, 'Try Praise,' INC., September 1996, p. 115.
S. Caudron, 'The Top 20 Ways to Motivate Employees,' Industry week, April 3, 1995, pp. 15- 16. See also B. Nelson, 'Try Praise,' INC., September 1996, p. 115.
E. Sunstrom, K. DeMeuse, and D. Futrell, 'Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness,' American Psychologist, February 1990, pp. 120- 133.
J. H. Shonk, Team-Based Organizations (Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin, 1992); and M.A. Verespej, 'When Workers Get New Roles,' Industry Week, February 3, 1992, p. 11.
S. G. Cohen, G. E. Ledford, Jr., and G. M. Spreitzer, 'A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness:' Human Relations, May 1996, pp. 643-676; C. E. Nicholls, H. W. Lane, and M. Brehm Brechu, 'Taking Self- Managed Teams to Mexico;' Academy of Management Executive, August 1999, pp. 15-27; and A. Erez, J. A. LePine, and H. Elms, 'Effects of Rotated Leadership and Peer Evaluation on the Functioning and Effectiveness of Self-Managed Teams: A Quasi-experiment,' Personnel Psychology, Winter 2002, pp. 929-948.
J. Lipnack and J. Stamps, Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries and Tech· nology, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 2000); C. B. Gibson and S. G. Cohen (eds.), Virtual Teams That Work (San Francisco: Jessey-Bass, 2003); and L. L. Martins, L. L. Gilson, and M. T. Maynard, 'Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here?' Journal of Management, November 2004, pp. 805-835.
J. R. Hackman, 'The Design of Work Teams,' in J. W. Lorsch (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987), pp. 315-342; and M. A. Campion, G. J. Medsker, and C. A. Higgs, 'Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups,' Personnel Psychology, Winter 1993, pp. 823-850.
D. E. Hyatt and T. M. Ruddy, 'An Examination of the Relationship Between Work Group and Performance: Once More into the Breech,' Personnel Psychology, Autumn 1997, p. 555.
Hyatt and Ruddy, 'An Examination of the Relationship Between Work Group Characteristics and Performance,' p. 577.
P. Balkundi and D. A. Harrison, 'Ties, Leaders, and Time in Teams: Strong Inference About Network Structure's Effects on Team Viability and Performance,' Academy of Management Journal 49, no. l (2006), pp. 49-68; G. Chen, B. L. Kirkman, R. Kanfer, D. Allen, and B. Rosen, 'A Multilevel Study of Leadership, Empowerment, and Performance in Teams,' Journal of Applied Psychology 92, no. 2 (2007), pp. 331- 346; L. A. DeChurch and M. A. Marks, 'Leadership in Multi-team Systems,' Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 2 (2006), pp. 311-329; A. Srivastava, K. M. Bartol, and E. A. Locke, 'Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, and Performance,' Academy of Management Journal 49, no. 6 (2006), pp. 1239-1251; and J. E. Mathieu, K. K. Gilson, and T. M. Ruddy, 'Empowerment and Team Effectiveness: An Empirical Test of an Integrated Model,' Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 1 (2006), pp. 97-108.
K. T. Dirks, 'Trust in Leadership and Team Performance: Evidence from NCAA Basketball,' Journal of Applied Psychology, December 2000, pp. 1004-1012; and M. Williams, 'In Whom We Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development,' Academy of Management Review, July 2001, pp. 377- 396.
S. T. Johnson, 'Work Teams: What's Ahead in Work Design and Rewards Management,' Compensation & Benefits Review, March-April 1993, pp. 35-41; and L. N. McClurg, 'Team Rewards: How Far Have We Come?' Human Resource Management, Spring 2001, pp. 73-86.
R. R. Hirschfeld, M. H. Jordan, H. S. Feild, W. F. Giles, and A. A. Annenakis, 'Becoming Team Players: Team Members' Mastery of Teamwork Knowledge as a Predictor of Team Task Proficiency and Observed Teamwork Effectiveness,' Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 1 (2006), pp. 467-474.
M. J. Stevens and M.A. Campion, ”The knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management,” Journal of Management, Summer 1994,pp. 503-530.
H. Moon, J. R. Hollenbeck, and S. E. Humphrey, 'Asymmetric Adaptability: Dynamic Team Structures as One· Way Streets,' Academy of Management Journal 47, no. 5 (October 2004), pp. 681-695; A. P. J. Ellis, J. R. Hollenbeck, and D. R. Ilgen, 'Team Leaning: Collectively Connecting the Dots,' Journal of Applied Psychology 88, no. 5 (October 2003), pp. 821-835; C. L. Jackson and J. A. LePine, 'Peer Responses to a Team's Weakest Link: A Test and Extension of LePine and Van Dyne's Model,' Journal of Applied Psychology 88, no. 3 (June 2003), pp. 459-475; and J. A. LePine, 'Team Adaptation and Post-change Performance: Effects of Team Composition in Terms of Members' . Cognitive Ability and Personality,' Journal of Applied -Psychology 88, no. I (February 2003), pp. 27-39.
Ellis, Hollenbeck, and Ilgen, 'Team Learning'; C. O. L. H. Porter, J. R. Hollenbeck, and D. R. Ilgen, 'Backing Up Behaviors in Teams: The Role of Personality and Legitimacy of Need,' Journal of Applied Psychology 88, no. 3 (June 2003), pp. 391403; A. Colquitt, J. R. Hollenbeck, and D. R. Ilgen, 'Computer-Assisted Communication and Team Decision-Making Performance: The Moderating Effect of Openness to Experience,' Journal of Applied Psychology 87, no. 2 (April 2002), pp. 402410; J. A. LePine, J. R. Hollenbeck, D. R. Ilgen, and J. Hedlund, 'The Effects of Individual Differences on the Performance of Hierarchical Decision Making Teams: Much More Than G,' Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1997), pp. 803-811; Jackson and LePine, 'Peer Responses to a Team's Weakest Link'; and LePine, 'Team Adaptation and Post-change Performance.'
C. Margerison and D. McCann, Team Management: Practical New Approaches (London: Mercury Books, 1990).
G. S. Van Der Vegt, J. S. Bunderson, and A. Oosterhof, 'Expertness Diversity and Interpersonal Helping in Teams: Why Those Who Need the Most Help End Up Getting the Least,' Academy of Management Journal 49, no. 5 (2006), pp. 877-893.
J. Katzenbach, 'What Makes Teams Work?' Fast Company, November 2000, p. 110.
L. A. Curral, R. H. Forrester, and J. F. Dawson, 'It's What You Do and the Way That You Do It: Team Task, Team Size, and Innovation-Related Group Processes,' European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 10, no. 2 (June 2001), pp. 187-204; R. C. Liden, S. J. Wayne, and R. A. Jaworski, 'Social Loafing: A Field Investigation;' Journal of Management 30, no. 2 (2004), pp. 285-304; and J. A. Wagner, 'Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in Groups,' Academy of Management Journal 38, no. 1 (February 1995), pp. 152-172.
Hyatt and Ruddy, 'An Examination of the Relationship Between Work Group Characteristics and Performance'; J. D. Shaw, M. K. Duffy, and E. M. Stark, 'Interdependence and Preference for Group Work: Main and Congruence Effects on the Satisfaction and Performance of Group Members,' Journal of 'Management 26, no. 2 (2000), pp. 259-279; and S. A. Kiffin- Peterson and J. L. Cordery, 'Trust, Individualism, and Job Characteristics of Employee Preference for Teamwork;' International Journal of Human Resource Management, February 2003, pp. 93-116.
I. D. Steiner, Group Processes and Productivity (New York: Academic Press, 1972).
K. Hess, Creating the High-Performance Team (New York: Wiley, 1987); Katzenbach and Smith, The Wisdom of Teams, pp. 43-64; K. D. Scott and A. Townsend, 'Teams: Why Some Succeed and Others Fail,' HRMagazine, August 1994, pp. 62-67; and K. Blanchard, D. Carew, and E. Parisi-Carew, 'How to Get Your Group to Perform Like a Team,' Training and Development, September 1996, pp. 34-37.
A. Gurtner. F. Tschan, N. K.. Semmer, and C. Nagele, 'Getting Groups to Develop Good Strategies: Effects of Reflexivity Interventions Team Process, Team Performance, and Shared Mental Models,' Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102 (2007), pp. l27-142; M. C. Schippers, D. N. Den Hartog, and P. L. Koopman, 'Reflexivity in Teams: A Measure and Correlates,' Applied Psychology: All International Review 56, no. 2 (2007), pp. 189-211; and C. S. Burke, K. C. Stagl, E. Salas, L. Pierce, and D. Kendall, 'Understanding Team Adaptation: A Conceptual Analysis and Model:' Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 6 (2006), pp. 1189-1207.
E. Weldon and L. R. Weingart, 'Group Goals and Group Performance,' British Journal of Social Psychology, Spring 1993, pp. 307-334. See also R. P. DeShon, S. W. J. Kozlowski. A. M. Schmidt, K. R. Milner, and D. Wiechmann, 'A Multiple- Goal, Multilevel Model of Feedback Effects on the Regulation of Individual and Team Performance,' Journal of Applied Psychology, December2004, pp. 1035-1056.
K. Tasa, S. Taggar, and G. H. Seijts, 'The Development of Collective Efficacy in Teams: A Multilevel and Longitudinal Perspective,' Journal of Applied Psychology 92, no. 1 (2007), pp. 17-27; C. B. Gibson, 'The Efficacy Advantage: Factors Related to the Formation of Group Efficacy,' Journal of Applied Social Psychology, October 2003, pp. 2153-2086; and D. I. Jung and J. J. Sosik, 'Group Potency and Collective Efficacy: Examining Their Predictive Validity, Level of Analysis, and Effects of Performance Feedback on Future Group Performance,' Group & Organization Management, September 2003, pp. 366-391.
A. P. J. Ellis, 'System Breakdown: The Role of Mental Models and Trans-active Memory the Relationships Between Acute Stress and Team Performance,' Academy of Management Journal 49, no. 3 (2006), pp. 576-589.
S. W. J. Kozlowski and D. R. Ilgen, 'Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams,' Psychological Science i11 the Public Interest, December 2006, pp. 77- 124; and B. D. Edwards, E. A. Day, W. Arthur, Jr., and S. T. Bell, 'Relationships Among Team Ability Composition, Team Mental Models, and Team Performance,' Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 3 (2006), pp. 727-736.
K. A. Jehn, 'A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups;' Administrative Science Quarterly, September 1997, pp. 530- 557. See also R. S. Peterson and K. J. Behfar, 'The Dynamic Relationship Between Performance Feedback, Trust, and Conflict in Groups: A Longitudinal Study;' Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, September-November 2003, pp. 102-112.
K. H. Price, D. A. Harrison, and J. H. Gavin, 'Withholding Inputs in Team Contexts: Member Composition, Interaction Processes, Evaluation Structure, and Social Loafing,' Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 6 (2006), pp. 1375-1384.
Daft, R. and Macintosh, N.B.,” A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.26(1981), 207-224.
Gladstein, D.L.,” Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.29(1984), 499-517.
Perrow, C., “ A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations” American Sociological Review, Vol.32(1967), 197-208
Bryman, A. (1992).Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage.
G. Yukl, D. D. Van Fleet. Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough, Eds., Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd edition, Vol. 3). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992: 147-197.
Thompson, J. D. (1967), Organization in Action, New York:McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Van Der Vegt,G. S.,Emans Ben J. M. and Van De Vliert, E.(2001)“Patterns of Interdependence in Work Teams: A Two-Level Investigation of the Relations with Job and Team Satisfaction”, Personnel Psychology, 54(1):51-69.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4871-
dc.description.abstract都市更新是一個具有高不確定、高複雜、高耗時與低成功率卻又不得不進行的土 地開發整合事業。願意加入都市更新整合工作的成員通常有比較高的成就需求, 在都市更新團隊這樣的任務特性之下,只有交易式領導是不夠的,只有轉換型領 導又不切實際。研究顯示,當資質平庸的成員與其任務奮戰時,聰明的領導者總 是能適時幫忙。相反地,資質平庸的領導者則會抵銷高能力團隊的效能。因此, 找出合適領導都市更新團隊者的人格特質,調整出有效的領導型態,使用正確的 激勵方式,才能增強都市更新團隊的整體效能。 轉換型領導本質上與魅力領導、願景領導是相同的。領導者企圖在轉換的過程中 影響跟隨者的價值觀或動機,使跟隨者提升到較高的層次。魅力領導透過對願景 的提出、溝通與激勵以引發跟隨者的熱情、不再侷限於關注自我利益,轉而為團 隊或組織的利益而努力等步驟來發揮領導效能,這個過程就是一種轉換過程。而 交易型領導是轉換型領導的基礎,同一領導者若能同時展現出轉換型與交易型兩 種領導風格,其所能產生的部屬努力與團隊績效會超過僅用交易型領導時所產生 的。一項評論87個有關轉換型領導的研究顯示,轉換型領導更能激勵與滿足跟隨 者,而且能讓他們有更高績效,更知覺到領導者效能。和交易型領導相比,轉換 型領導和較低的離職率、較高的生產力、較低的員工壓力與疲憊,及較高的員工 滿意度之間呈現更強的相關。 本研究受訪公司以權宜獎賞的方式為基礎,提供適當報酬,促其員工達成目標。 除此之外,領導者有方向、有熱情、有挑戰、有關懷,用這四個轉換的手段來帶 領團隊,試圖讓部屬更認同這個公司,不那麼計較短期內都市更新案是不是能夠 成案,而願意持續不斷地投入。財務誘因在短期內較具激勵效果,長期而言,非 財務誘因更能激勵人心。具有高成長需求的員工,對於工作中包含豐富核心構面 的感受性會比低成長需求的員工更強。證據顯示,工作豐富化雖然未必能提高關 鍵生產力,但能降低曠職與離職成本,提高工作滿足感。當任務特性有工作績效 的回饋及酬償系統不佳的情況時,引進工作豐富化最能發揮效益。受訪公司透過 四個途徑,對其團隊成員發揮內在激勵的效果,分別是建立雇主品牌,強化團隊 凝聚力、扁平化組織設計,鼓勵同仁自我發揮、累積小成功,增強集體信念及掃 除工作障礙,提高團隊功效。 都市更新是城市發展必然的過程,也是改善市民居住環境與生活品質的重要手段。 台北市的都市更新事業發展正處於成長期,但政府、地主與實施者三方的關係依 然還在磨合階段。過程中,居民意見整合效能尤其有很大的改善空間。本研究希 望對更新團隊的效能有提升的效用,能為復甦都市機能,改善居住環境,增進公 共利益做出貢獻。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractUrban renewal is a land developing and integrating enterprise with characteristics of high uncertainty, complexity and time consuming but low success rates, and yet it is an inevitable process of Taipei city.
Members who are willing to join an urban renewal-integrating team usually have a higher need for achievement. Under the task characteristics of the urban renewal team, transactional leadership alone is not enough, transformational leadership alone is also unrealistic.
Studies have shown that when mediocre members struggle with its mandate, experienced leaders always provide timely help. Conversely, mediocre leaders may offset the superior team’s performance.
Therefore, finding a suitable personality for urban renewal team leaders, adjusting it to an effective leadership style, using adequate incentives are crucial to enhance the overall effectiveness of an urban renewal team.
Transformational leadership is essentially the same as charismatic leadership and vision leadership. Leaders attempt to influence followers’ values and motives in the process of conversion to take the followers to a higher level.
Charismatic leadership is through vision, communication and incentives to induce raising followers’ enthusiasm in order to make efforts for the benefit of the team or organization, and not just focusing on self-interest. This process is a kind of transformation.
Transformational leadership builds on top of transactional leadership. If one leader who can display the combined two leadership styles at the same time, he will produce higher levels of subordinates’ effort and team performance than that of transactional leadership alone.
A review of 87 case studies on transformational leadership reveals that transformational leadership can inspire and satisfy the followers even more, and raises their performance and perceptivity about the leader’s effectiveness.
Compared to transactional leadership, transformational leadership has much stronger correlation with lower staff turnover, higher productivity, lower employee stress and fatigue, and higher employee satisfaction.
In this study the surveyed companies are based on the method of contingency reward to provide adequate remuneration, and to promote employees achievement of their goals. In addition, the leaders with the four conversion means, i.e. idealized influence (direction), inspirational motivation (passion), intellectual stimulation (challenge) and individual consideration (care), to lead the team to make employees feel more affiliated with the company, therefore continuing to focus on the ultimate success of the project over the long term.
Financial incentives may be motivating more effectively in the short term, but in the long run, non-financial incentives inspire people even more. Employees with high growth needs are more likely to experience the psychological states when their jobs are enriched, and respond to them more positively than their counterparts with low growth need. Although the evidence on job enrichment does not necessarily indicate the improvement on critical productivity, however it does reduce absenteeism and turnover costs and increase satisfaction levels. When the circumstances encounter poor feedback and a bad reward system, introducing job enrichment into the task works most effectively. The surveyed companies have taken four steps to stimulate their team members’ intrinsic motivation, which are: building up employer’s brand name to enhance team cohesion; flattening the organization to encourage self-achievement; accumulating small successes to enhance collective confidence, and removing any obstacles to improve effective team performance.
Urban renewal is an inevitable process of urban development and also an important means to improve city residents living environment and quality. Taipei's urban renewal development is in a growth period, but the relationship among government, landowners and implementers still remains at the phase of trying to reach common goals.
In the process, private land assembly efficiency particularly has room for improvement. This study hopes to enhance work team effectiveness by leadership and motivation to restore urban functions, improve living environments and to make a contribution to the industry and the public.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-14T17:49:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-P01748005-1.pdf: 1521380 bytes, checksum: 4f45cb63da28ed569ba09039adf49e9a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
口試委員會審定書………………………………………… i
誌謝 ………………………………………… ii
中文摘要 ………………………………………… iii
英文摘要 ………………………………………… iv
第一章 、 緒論
第一節 、 研究動機 …………………………………………1
第二節 、 研究目的 ………………………………………… 3
第三節 、 研究對象與範圍 ………………………………………… 4
第四節 、 研究方法與流程 ………………………………………… 5
第二章 、 文獻探討
第一節 、 領導理論
1 、 領導理論的演進 ………………………………………… 7
2 、 人格特質 ………………………………………… 8
3 、 領導風格 …………………………………………10
第二節 、 激勵理論
1 、 激勵理論的演進 ………………………………………… 14
2 、 近代的激勵理論 ………………………………………… 15
3 、 激勵的應用方式 ………………………………………… 16
第三節 、 都市更新團隊
1 、 工作團隊 …………………………………………21
2 、 團隊類型 ………………………………………… 22
3 、 團隊效能 …………………………………………23
4 、 任務特性 ………………………………………… 25
5 、 都市更新的介紹 …………………………………………26
6 、 都市更新的程序 ………………………………………… 28
7 、 都市更新的運作 ………………………………………… 30
8 、 都市更新的困境 ………………………………………… 31
9 、 都市更新團隊的任務特 …………………………………… 32
第三章 、 問題研究與分析
第一節 、 背景因素
1 、 領導型態 ………………………………………… 35
2 、 組織結構 ………………………………………… 38
3 、 組織氣氛 ………………………………………… 39
4 、 目標設定與考核 ………………………………………… 40
5 、 激勵方式 ………………………………………… 41
第二節 、團隊的組成
1 、 人格特質 ……………………………………………………… 44
2 、 角色分派 ……………………………………………………… 45
3 、 人口統計屬性 ……………………………………………… 45
第三節 、 團隊的程序
1 、 共同的目的 …………………………………………………… 46
2 、 團隊信心 ……………………………………………………… 47
3 、 衝突管理 ……………………………………………………… 48
4 、 團隊功效 ……………………………………………………… 49
第四章 、個案應用
第一節 、 個案公司背景說明
1 、 風雨飄搖,另創新局 ………………………………………… 50
2 、 多點佈局,投入都更 ………………………………………… 50
3 、 功能部門的組織設計 ………………………………………… 51
4 、 推案未如預期,組織陷入困頓 …………………………… 52
第二節 、 領導型態
1 、 個案公司的決策結構 ………………………………………… 52
2 、 個案公司的領導風格 ………………………………………… 52
3 、 兩家公司領導風格比較 ……………………………………… 54
第三節 、 激勵方式
1 、 個案公司的激勵方式 ………………………………………… 56
2 、 理論面的輝映 ………………………………………………… 57
3 、 實務面的印證 ………………………………………………… 59
第四節 、 領導型態與激勵方式的調整
1 、 適合領導都更團隊的人格特質 ……………………………… 62
2 、 適合都更團隊特性的領導風格 ……………………………… 62
3 、 適合都更團隊特性的激勵方式 ……………………………… 64
第五章 、結論
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………………… 68
附錄 ……………………………………………………………………………… 82

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程 …………………………………………………………… 6
圖2-1 大五特質對OB的影響 …………………………………………………… 9
圖2-2 全範圍的領導模式 …………………………………………………………13
圖2-3 工作特性模式 …………………………………………………………… 18
圖2-4 工作豐富化的指導方針…………………………………………………… 20
圖2-5 團體運作過程的結果……………………………………………………… 24
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject團隊效能zh_TW
dc.subject領導zh_TW
dc.subject激勵zh_TW
dc.subject都市更新zh_TW
dc.subjectleadershipen
dc.subjectteam effectivenessen
dc.subjectmotivationen
dc.subjecturban renewalen
dc.title領導與激勵在都市更新團隊的應用研究zh_TW
dc.titleApplied Research of Leadership and Motivation in Urban Renewal Industry - A Case Study of a Private Land Assembly Teamen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee廖咸興,張婷婷
dc.subject.keyword領導,激勵,團隊效能,都市更新,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordleadership,motivation,team effectiveness,urban renewal,en
dc.relation.page105
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2015-01-21
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學組zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf1.49 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved