請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48546完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李顯峰(Hsien-Feng Lee) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yu Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳亭宇 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T07:01:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-01-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-01-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-01-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 95年工商及服務業普查總報告，行政院主計處，民國97年12月。
吳慧瑛（1998），「家庭人口規模與所得分配，1976-1995」，《經濟論文》，26（1），19-50。 李秀雲、何嫈嫈（1999），「人力資本與內生成長-亞洲四小龍和日本的時間序列分析」，經濟論文叢刊，27（3），311-335。 林延霖（2006），「人力資本與金融發展對經濟成長之影響」，國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文。 林俊宏、王淳玄（2004），「教育不均度、所得分配與經濟成長-臺灣之實證分析」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。 林秋發、黃美玲（1994），「臺灣所得收入者所得分配之研究」，國立屏東商專學報，第2期（1994年2月），19-58。 邱忠榮（1999），「臺灣省各縣市所得不均度分析」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃，9，39-63。 俞哲民（2008），「人口老化對於所得分配之影響－以臺灣二十三個縣市為例」，國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。 晏儀華（1998），「台灣工資所得不均度的實證研究」，暨南國際大學經濟學系碩士論文。 康琪珮（2006），「臺灣各縣市地方社會福利支出對人口遷移之影響」，國立政治大學碩士論文。 莊奕琦、趙振瑛（1999），「人力資本與經濟成長外生性檢定與因果分析-以臺灣實證為例」，中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書，46，79-107。 曹添旺（1996），「台灣家庭所得不均度的分解與變化試析, 1980-1993」，人文社會科學集刊， 8（2），181-219。 許振明、劉完淳(2002)，「金融發展在經濟成長中的角色-臺灣與韓國的實證研究」，國家政策研究基金會，2002年11月13日。 陳明郎、周麗娟（1993），「由人力資源探討臺灣各縣市所得成長差異：理論與實證」，中國經濟學會年會論文集，143-165。 陳鍵職與吳慧瑛（2007），「台灣地區製造業與服務業技術人力升級之研究」，台灣經濟論衡，5（3），1-22。 廖鈺郡（2008），「所得分配衡量方式之比較」，主計月刊97年11月第635期。 趙文衡（2003），「從反全球化浪潮看全球化分配問題」，臺灣日報，2003年9月23日。 趙振瑛（1998），「人力資本與經濟成長關係之研究」，國立政治大學經濟研究所博士論文。 劉鶯釧（1983），「臺灣地區家庭所得分配之多因素分析」，中山社會科學研究所叢刊，12，109-136。 戴安蕙（2003），「臺灣北部區域空間經濟變遷之研究（1970-1999）」，中國文化大學地學研究所博士論文。 謝德宗（1993），「總體所得分配理論」，總體經濟理論與政策，華泰書局，413-422。 鐘俊文（2004），「人口結構轉變之趨勢與對策」，行政院經濟建設委員會出版。 饒志堅、蔡鈺泰、連子惠、莊文寬、葉芳珠、黃麗妃（2008），「全球化對所得分配影響之研究」，行政院主計處統計專題研究報告，97年3月。 Arora, Vivek and Vamvakidis, Athanasios（2005）,“How Much Do Trading Partners Matter for Economic Growth?” IMF Staff Papers, 52（1）, pp.24-40. Barro, Robert J.（1997）, Determinants of Economic Growth：A Cross-Country Empirical Study, Cambridge, MA：MIT Press. Barro, Robert J.（2000）,“Inequality and Growth in A Panel of Countries,” Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), pp.5-32. Barro, R. J. and Lee, J.-W.（2001）“International Data on Eeucational Attainment Updates and Implications,” Oxford Economic Papers, 3, pp.541-563. Bassanini, Andrea and Scarpetta, Stefano（2002）,“Does Human Capital Matter for Growth in OECD Countries? A Pooled Mean-Group Approach,” Economics Letters, 74（3）, pp. 399-405. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and Levine, R.（2007）,“Finance, Inequality, and the Poor,” Journal of Economic Growth, 12（1）, pp.27-49. Beck, T., Levine, R. and Loayza, N.（1999）,“Finance and the Sources of Growth,” Journal of Financial Economics, 58（2000）, pp.261-300. Ben Bernanke's Class Day Speech at Harvard University Commencement, 2008. Bhalla, S.（2002）, Imagine There is No Country：Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in the Era of Globalization, Washington, D.C.:Institute for International Economics. Bils, Mark and Klenow, Peter J.（2000）,“Does Schooling Cause Growth?”The American Economic Review, 90（5）, pp. 1160-1183. Bjorklund, A.（1991）,“Unemployment and Income Distribution ： Time-Series Evidence from Sweden,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93（3）, pp.457-465. Bloom, D. E. and Finlay, J. E. （2009）,“Demographic Change and Economic Growth in Asia,” Asian Economic Policy Review, 4, pp.45-64. Bloom, David E. and Williamson,Jeffrey G.（1998）,“Demographic Transitions and Economic Miracles in Emerging Asia,” World Bank Econ Rev, 12(3), pp.419-455. Bloom, David E., Canning,David and Malaney, Pia N.（1999）,“Demographic Change and Economic Growth in Asia,” Center for Information Development Working Paper no. 15, Havard University, Cambridge, MA. Brander,James A. and Dowrick, Steve（1994）,“The role of fertility and population in economic growth,” Journal of Population Economics, 7, pp.1-25. Cornia, Giovanni Andrea and Kiiski, Sampsa （2001）,“Trends in income distribution in the post World War II Period: Evidence and Interpretation,” WIDER Discussion paper 2001/89. Danziger, S., Gottschalk, P. and Smolensky, E.（1989）,“American Income Inequality：How the Rich Have Fared, 1973-87,” AEA Paper and Proceedings, 79（2）, pp.310-314. Deaton, Angus S. and Paxson, Christina H.（1994）,“Intertemporal Choice and Inequality,”' Journal of Political Economy, 102(3), pp.437-67. Deaton, Angus S. and Paxson, Christina H. （1995）,“Saving, Inequality and Aging: an East Asian Perspective,” Asia-Pacific Economic Review, 1(1), pp.7-19. Deininger, Klaus and Squire, Lyn（1998）,“New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: inequality and growth,” Journal of Development Economics, 57（2）, pp.259-287. Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and Levine, R.（2007）,“Finance and Opportunity: Financial System and Intergenerational Persistence of Relative Income,” Mimeo., Brown University. Dollar, David and Kraay, Aart （2002）,“Growth is Good for the Poor,” Journal of Economic Growth, 7, pp.195-225. Domar, E.（1946）,“Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment,” Econometrica, 14, pp.137-147. Dowrick, S. and Akmal, M.（2005）,“Contradictory Trends in Global Income Inequality: A Tale of Two Biases,” Review of Income and Wealth, 51, pp.201-229. Dowrick, Steve and Golley, Jane（2004）,“Trade openness and growth: Who benefits,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20（1）, pp.38-56. Duleep, H. O. and Regets, C. M.（1999）,“Immigrants and Human-Capital Investment,” American Economic Review Paper and Proceedings, 89(2), pp.186-91. Garrett, Geoffrey (2001),“The Distributive Consequences of Globalization,” Mimeo. Yale University. Gini, C.（1912）, Variabilita e mutabilita, Bologna. Harrod, R.F.（1939）,“An Essay in Dynamic Theory,” Economic Journal, 49, pp.14-33. Hausman, J.A.（1978）,“Specification Test in Econometrics,” Econometrica, 46（6）, pp.1251-1271. Hu, Sheng-cheng（1995）,“Demographics, Productivity Growth and the Macroeconomics Equilibrium,” Economic Inquiry, 33（4）, PP.592-610. International Monetary Fund（2007）,“Globalization and Inequality,” World Economic Outlook, October 2007 issue, pp.31-65. Jao, C. C.（2000）,“The Impact of Tax Revenue and Social Welfare Expenditure on Income Distribution in Taiwan,” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 5(1), pp.73-90. Jaumotte, F., Lall, S. and Papgeorgiou, C.（2008）,“Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization?” IMF Working Paper WP/08/185. Johnson, George, E.（1997）,“Change in Earnings Inequality：The Role of Demand Shifts,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11（2）, pp.41-54. Katz, L. F. and Murphy, K. M.（1992）,“Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), pp.35-78. Krugman, Paul（1994）,“Then Myth of Asia's Miracle,” Foreign Affairs, 73（6）, pp.62. Kuznets, Simon（1955）,“Economoc Growth and Income Inequality,” The American Economic Review, 45（1）, pp.1-28. Levine, R., Loayza, N. and Beck, T.（1999）,“Financial Intermediation and Growth:Causality and Causes,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 46-1, pp.31-77. Lucas, Robert E. Jr.（1988）,“On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 21（1）, pp.3-42. Klein, Michael W. and Olivei, Giovanni P.（2008）,“Capital account liberalization, financial depth, and economic growth,”Journal of International Money and Finance, 27 (6), pp. 861-875. Milanovic, Branko（2005）,“Can We Discern the Effect of Globalization on Income Distribution? Evidence from Household Budget Surveys,” World Bank Economic Review, April（1）, pp.21-44. Ramsey, Frank（1928）,“A Mathematical Theory of Saving,” Economic Journal, 38, pp.543-559. Ricardo, D.（1817）, The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 1817. Romer, P. M.（1986）,“Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 6, pp.18-31. Rosen, Sherwin（1976）,“A Theory of Life Earnings,” Journal of Political Economy, 84, pp.545-567. Schive, C.（2002）,“Economic Efficiency and the Taiwan Economy: 1986-96,” Productivity and Economic Performance in the Asia-Pacific Region, Tsu-Tan Fu, Cliff J. Huang, C. A. Knox Lovell , pp.139-160. Sen, A.（1973）, On Economic Inequality, Clarendon, Oxford. Shaw, Edward S.（1973）, Financial Deepening in Economic Development, New York:Oxford University Press. Shorrocks, Anthony F.（1980）,“The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures,” Econometrica., 48（3）, pp.613-625. Solow, Robert M.（1956）,“A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70（1）, pp.65-94. Stolper, Wolfgang F. and Samuelson, Paul A.（1941）,“Protection and Real Wages,” Review of Economic Studies, 9 (November), pp.58-73. Sutcliffe, Bob（2003）,“A more or less unequal world? World income distribution in the 20th century,” University of Massachusetts Amherst, Political Economy Research Institute, Working Paper Series, No. 54. Published as 'World Inequality and Globalization', Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20（1）, pp.15-37. Tallman, E. and Wang, P.（1994）,“Human Capital and Endogeous Growth: Evidence Frome Taiwan,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, pp.101-124. Theil, H.（1967）, Economics and Information Theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Topalova, Petia（2007）,“Trade Liberalization, Poverty, and Inequality: Evidence from Indian Districts,”in Globalization and Poverty, pp.291-335. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) Trow, Martin（1973）, Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education, Berkeley, CA：Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. Uzawa, Hirofumi（1965）,“Optimum Technical Change in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth,” International Economic Reviews, 6, pp.18-31. White, Howard and Anderson, Edward（2001）,“Growth versus Distribution: Does the Pattern of Growth Matter?” Development Policy Review, 19(3), pp.267-89. Wiles, P.（1974）, Distribution of Income: East and West, Amsterdam: North Holland. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48546 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文旨在研究臺灣地區的所得分配不均與經濟成長，應用1998年至2008年財政部財稅中心資料並結合各縣市與全國性因素形成之追蹤資料（Panel data），探討人力狀況與全球化潮流等因素對臺灣各縣市所得分配與經濟成長之影響。
本文實證結果發現各教育程度變數均與所得分配不均呈負相關，就業者教育程度提升有助於各縣市所得總額與五等份位法下各所得等份組所得之提升；人口增加會促進地方所得總額，擴大所得分配差距；人口老化對地方所得總額或是各所得組家戶所得均是正面的，且擴大所得分配差距但不顯著；實質資本的增加與金融深化對所得總額成長及各所得等份位組家戶所得成長均有正面貢獻，有助縮小所得分配差距；貿易對各縣市所得總額增加有正向效果但不顯著，且對低所得組家戶所得的提升有顯著正面影響，但對高所得組之家戶所得則有顯著負面影響，有利縮小所得分配差距並具顯著性；外人對台投資增加有助於各縣市所得總額增加，對各所得組家戶所得之影響亦為顯著的正向關係，有助縮小所得分配差距但不顯著；國人對外投資增加對於所得分配與各縣市所得總額增加在本文實證不具顯著效果，而對最低所得組與最高所得組有負面影響。另外，各職業別人口比率對所得分配之影響皆不具顯著性，其中工業就業人口增加有利於所得總額及各所得等份位組之家戶所得增加，而農業與服務業就業人口增加對所得總額及各所得等份位組之家戶所得變動之影響大致為負向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the influencing factors of the income inequality and economic growth in Taiwan cities and counties with the sample period from 1998 to 2008. The sample data are taken from the Finance Data Center in the Ministry of Finance, and five quintiles of household income are selected in the study.
Our major findings are as follows. It shows that the relationship between each education level of employees and the income inequality is negative. The increase in the education level of employees is also contributive to increase the total income of the cities and counties and the average real household income of all quintiles. Increasing population promotes the local total income and enlarges the inequality of income distribution. Aging population brings a positive impact on local total income and the household income of all quintiles, it enlarges the income inequality but statistically insignificant. Increasing real capital and the financial deepening are positively related to the growth of local total income and the household income of all income quintiles that contributes to reduce the income inequality. Furthermore, international trade is positively related to the total income of cities and counties although it is not significant, and it has positive impact on the increase of low income quintiles, but has a significantly negative impact on the highest income quintile, that helps shorten the inequality gap. The increase of FDI inward helps increase the local total income, it also results in a positive impact on all income quintiles, that helps to reduce the inequality gap but insignificant. The increase of FDI outward is insignificant to the income inequality and total income of cities and counties. And it also has no impact on the middle income group, but has a negative impact on the lowest and the highest income quintiles. In addition, the population ratio of each occupation does not have a significant impact on the income distribution – raising in the industry employees ratio is in favor of increasing the local total income and the household income of all income quintiles, but raising in the agriculture and service employees ratio has negative impacts on the local total income and the household income of al income quintiles. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T07:01:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-P96323011-1.pdf: 777335 bytes, checksum: 55e4c72e4080be362ad7d8bccf69a021 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………… i
誌謝………………………………………………………………. ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………… iii 英文摘要……………………………………………..…………. iv 第一章 緒論……………………………………… ……….. 1 第一節 研究動機與背景……………………………………… 1 第二節 臺灣地區經濟發展概況……………………………… 5 第三節 臺灣地區所得分配現況……………………………… 7 第四節 研究目的與架構……………………………………… 10 第二章 文獻回顧…………………………………………….. 11 第一節 所得分配文獻………………………………………… 11 第二節 經濟成長文獻……………………………..…………… 16 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………….. 22 第一節 所得分配與經濟成長理論基礎………………………… 22 第二節 模型之建立……………………………….…………… 29 第三節樣本選取與變數資料來源………………….………… 34 第四章 實證分析結果…………………………………………… 42 第一節 臺灣各縣市所得分配狀況…………….……………… 42 第二節 各被解釋變數橫斷面與縱斷面之比較…….………… 44 第三節 實證結果分析………….……………………………… 49 第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………… 64 第一節 結論…………………………………….……………… 64 第二節 研究限制與建議…………………………….………… 67 參考文獻…………………………………………………………… 68 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 家戶所得五等份組 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 所得分配不均 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經濟成長 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | household income quintiles | en |
| dc.subject | economic growth | en |
| dc.subject | income inequality | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣地區所得分配與成長影響因素之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Influencing Factors of Income Distribution and Growth in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝德宗,黃淑惠 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 所得分配不均,經濟成長,家戶所得五等份組, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | income inequality,economic growth,household income quintiles, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 78 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-01-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 759.12 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。